Evaluation of the self-administered indicator plaster neuropad for the diagnosis of neuropathy in diabetes

Screening tools for diabetic foot ulcers: a narrative review

The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is 4 to 10% among people with diabetes mellitus. DFUs are associated with increased morbidity and mortality as well as reduced quality of life and have a significant impact on overall healthcare expenditure. The main predisposing factors for DFU are diabetic neuropathy, peripheral arterial disease, and trauma. The fact that a range of tests can be used to identify patients at risk for DFU often causes confusion among practitioners regarding which screening tests should be implemented in clinical practice. Herein we sought to determine whether tests of somatic nerve function, such as pinprick sensation, thermal (cold/hot) test, ankle reflexes, vibration perception, 10-g monofilament, Ipswich touch test, neuropathy disability score, and nerve conduction studies, predict the development of DFUs. In addition, we examined whether sudomotor function screening tests, such as Neuropad, sympathetic skin response, and other tests, such as elevated plantar pressure or temperature measurements, can be used for DFU screening. If not treated properly, DFUs can have serious consequences, including amputation, early detection and treatment are vital for patient outcomes.

Sudomotor dysfunction in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) and its testing modalities: A literature review

Long term consequences of diabetes mellitus (DM) may include multi-organ complications such as retinopathy, cardiovascular disease, neuronal, and kidney damage. One of the most prevalent complication is diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), occurring in half of all diabetics, and is the main cause of disability globally with profound impact on a patient's quality of life. Small fiber neuropathy (SFN) can develop in the pre-diabetes stage preceding large fiber damage in DPN. Asymptomatic SFN is difficult to diagnose in early stages, with sudomotor dysfunction considered one of the earliest manifestations of autonomic neuropathy. Early detection is crucial as it can prevent potential cardiovascular events. Although punch skin biopsy is the gold-standard method for SFN diagnosis, implementation as routine screening is hindered due to its invasive, impractical, and time-consuming nature. Other sudomotor testing modalities, most of which evaluate the postganglionic cholinergic sympathetic nervous system, have been developed with varying sensitivity and specificity for SFN diagnosis. Here, we provide an overview on the general mechanism of DPN, the importance of sudomotor assessment for early detection of autonomic dysfunction in DPN, the benefits and disadvantages of current testing modalities, factors that may affect testing, and the importance of future discoveries on sudomotor testing for successful DPN diagnosis.

Concordance between sudomotor disorder and the clinical diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, according to various clinical guidelines

AIM

To assess the concordance between variations in Neuropad® results and the those in different diagnostic criteria of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, according to various clinical guidelines.

METHODS

A descriptive observational study was conducted of 111 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. The criteria for inclusion in the study were that patients should be aged 18 years or more and have at least 10 years' history of diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

73 (65.8%) were male and 38 (34.2%) were female. Their mean age was 57.92 ± 13.24 years (95% CI 55.45-60.38). Healthy Neuropad® findings were obtained for 35 right feet (31.5%) and 31 left feet (27.9%).

CONCLUSION

Neuropad® is an effective instrument for detecting macro and microvascular complications such as early-stage neuropathy, although its use should always be accompanied by a clinical examination of the foot.

Early Detection of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Focus on Small Nerve Fibres

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most common complication of both type 1 and 2 diabetes. As a result, neuropathic pain, diabetic foot ulcers and lower-limb amputations impact drastically on quality of life, contributing to the individual, societal, financial and healthcare burden of diabetes. DPN is diagnosed at a late, often pre-ulcerative stage due to a lack of early systematic screening and the endorsement of monofilament testing which identifies advanced neuropathy only. Compared to the success of the diabetic eye and kidney screening programmes there is clearly an unmet need for an objective reliable biomarker for the detection of early DPN. This article critically appraises research and clinical methods for the diagnosis or screening of early DPN. In brief, functional measures are subjective and are difficult to implement due to technical complexity. Moreover, skin biopsy is invasive, expensive and lacks diagnostic laboratory capacity. Indeed, point-of-care nerve conduction tests are convenient and easy to implement however questions are raised regarding their suitability for use in screening due to the lack of small nerve fibre evaluation. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a rapid, non-invasive, and reproducible technique to quantify small nerve fibre damage and repair which can be conducted alongside retinopathy screening. CCM identifies early sub-clinical DPN, predicts the development and allows staging of DPN severity. Automated quantification of CCM with AI has enabled enhanced unbiased quantification of small nerve fibres and potentially early diagnosis of DPN. Improved screening tools will prevent and reduce the burden of foot ulceration and amputations with the primary aim of reducing the prevalence of this common microvascular complication.

Advances in Screening, Early Diagnosis and Accurate Staging of Diabetic Neuropathy

The incidence of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes is increasing worldwide. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is among the most distressing and costly of all the chronic complications of diabetes and is a cause of significant disability and poor quality of life. This incurs a significant burden on health care costs and society, especially as these young people enter their peak working and earning capacity at the time when diabetes-related complications most often first occur. DPN is often asymptomatic during the early stages; however, once symptoms and overt deficits have developed, it cannot be reversed. Therefore, early diagnosis and timely intervention are essential to prevent the development and progression of diabetic neuropathy. The diagnosis of DPN, the determination of the global prevalence, and incidence rates of DPN remain challenging. The opinions vary about the effectiveness of the expansion of screenings to enable early diagnosis and treatment initiation before disease onset and progression. Although research has evolved over the years, DPN still represents an enormous burden for clinicians and health systems worldwide due to its difficult diagnosis, high costs related to treatment, and the multidisciplinary approach required for effective management. Therefore, there is an unmet need for reliable surrogate biomarkers to monitor the onset and progression of early neuropathic changes in DPN and facilitate drug discovery. In this review paper, the aim was to assess the currently available tests for DPN's sensitivity and performance.

Validation of Neuropad in the Assessment of Peripheral Diabetic Neuropathy in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Versus the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument, 10g Monofilament Application and Biothesiometer Measurement

Objective:

Sudomotor dysfunction is a feature of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN). The indicator plaster Neuropad can provide an easy and accurate way to diagnose DPN. The aim of the present study was to evaluate Neuropad’s specificity, sensitivity and accuracy in detecting DPN in patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM).

Methods:

A total of 174 patients with DM (79 with type 1 DM, 88 women), mean age 49.8 ± 16.1 years and mean DM duration 17.3 ± 7.7 years were included in the present study. The following methods were used to diagnose DPN: the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument Questionnaire and Examination (MNSIQ and MNSIE, respectively), application of 10 g monofilament (MONO) and measurement of vibration perception threshold with biothesiometer (BIO). Neuropad was applied to both feet in all patients and according to the presence or absence of color change of the sticker, patients were divided in two groups: group A (n = 82, complete change in color from blue to pink, depicting normal perspiration) and group B (n = 92, incomplete or no change, depicting abnormal perspiration).

Results:

MNSIQ and MNSIE were positive for DPN in 111 and 119 patients, respectively. BIO was abnormal in 109 and MONO in 59 patients. Sensitivity of Neuropad testing was 95% vs. MONO, 73% vs. BIO, 73% vs. MNSIE and 75% vs. ΜNSIQ. Specificity was 69, 81, 90 and 92%, respectively and accuracy of the test was 78, 76, 78 and 83%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Neuropad has a high sensitivity and specificity in detecting DPN vs. MNSIQ, MNSIE and BIO. Neuropad has a high sensitivity but moderate specificity vs. MONO. The accuracy of the test was high in all measurements.

Dryness of Foot Skin Assessed by the Visual Indicator Test and Risk of Diabetic Foot Ulceration: A Prospective Observational Study

Research Question: Previous cross-sectional studies have shown an association between sudomotor dysfunction and diabetic foot ulceration (DFU). The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to determine the role of dryness of foot skin and of established neurological modalities in the prediction of risk for foot ulceration in a cohort of individuals with diabetes mellitus (DM). Design: The study was conducted from 2012 to 2017. A total of 308 subjects with DM without history of DFU or critical limb ischemia completed the study. Diabetic neuropathy was assessed using the neuropathy symptom score (NSS) and neuropathy disability score (NDS). In a subset of participants, vibration perception threshold (VPT) was evaluated. Dryness of foot skin was assessed by the visual indicator plaster method (IPM). The diagnostic performance of the above neurological modalities for prediction of DFU was tested by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis. Results: During the 6-year follow-up, 55 patients (annual ulceration incidence 2.97%) developed DFU. Multivariate Cox-regression analysis after controlling for the effect of age, gender, and DM duration demonstrated that the risk (hazard ratio, 95% confidence intervals) of DFU increased significantly with either abnormal IPM (3.319, 1.460-7.545, p = 0.004) or high (≥6) NDS (2.782, 1.546-5.007, p = 0.001) or high (≥25 volts) VPT (2.587, 1.277-5.242, p = 0.008). ROC analysis showed that all neurological modalities could discriminate participants who developed DFU (p < 0.001). IPM testing showed high sensitivity (0.86) and low specificity (0.49), while high vs. low NDS and VPT showed low sensitivity (0.40 and 0.39, respectively) and high specificity (0.87 and 0.89, respectively) for identification of patients at risk for DFU. Conclusion: Dryness of foot skin assessed by the IPM predicts the development of DFU. IPM testing has high sensitivity, whereas high NDS and VPT have high specificity in identifying subjects at risk for DFU. The IPM can be included in the screening methods for identification of the foot at risk.

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: advances in diagnosis and strategies for screening and early intervention

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of both type 1 and 2 diabetes. It is a leading cause of lower-limb amputation and disabling neuropathic pain. Amputations in patients with diabetes have a devastating effect on quality of life and are associated with an alarmingly low life expectancy (on average only 2 years from the amputation). Amputation also places a substantial financial burden on health-care systems and society in general. With the introduction of national diabetes eye screening programmes, the prevalence of blindness in working-age adults is falling. This is not the case, however, with diabetes related amputations. In this Review, we appraise innovative point-of-care devices that enable the early diagnosis of DPN and assess the evidence for early risk factor-based management strategies to reduce the incidence and slow the progression of DPN. We also propose a framework for screening and early multifactorial interventions as the best prospect for preventing or halting DPN and its devastating sequelae.

Normative Values for Electrochemical Skin Conductances and Impact of Ethnicity on Quantitative Assessment of Sudomotor Function

BACKGROUND

Sudomotor dysfunction is one of the earliest pathophysiologic abnormalities in diabetes. Sudoscan™ (Impeto Medical, Paris, France) was developed as a noninvasive, rapid, and quantitative assessment of sudomotor function and has been shown to be sensitive in the detection of neuropathy. This global collaborative analysis aimed to establish reference values in healthy subjects of different ethnic groups, age, and gender, to define factors potentially affecting results, and to provide standardization of the methodology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 1,350 generally healthy study participants who underwent sudomotor function testing were collected and analyzed. The relationship between age, height, weight, gender, glycemic and lipid profiles, ethnicity, and hand and foot electrochemical skin conductance (ESC) was assessed among subgroups of participants.

RESULTS

Lower mean hands and feet ESC values were observed in African American, Indian, and Chinese subjects (P < 0.0001). No participant discomfort or safety concern was reported in 1,376 tests. No significant difference in ESC was observed between women and men at the hands (75 [57-87] vs. 76 [56-89] μS; P = 0.35) or feet (83.5 [71-90] vs. 82.5 [70-91] μS; P = 0.12). The coefficient of correlation between right and left side ESC was r = 0.96, P < 0.0001 for hands and r = 0.97, P < 0.0001 for feet. A significant but weak correlation was observed between ESC and age: for hands, r = -0.17, P < 0.0001; for feet, r = -0.19, P < 0.0001.

CONCLUSIONS

A normative reference range was established in whites showing that there was no effect of sex or body mass index and a slight decrease in ESC with age. Ethnicity influenced ESC scores, but additional studies are necessary to validate this effect and determine its mechanism and impact on nerve function.

Small-Fiber Neuropathy: A Diabetic Microvascular Complication of Special Clinical, Diagnostic, and Prognostic Importance

Damage of small nerve fibers may lead to a large variety of clinical symptoms. Small-fiber neuropathy underlies the symptoms of painful diabetic neuropathy, which may decrease quality of life. It also contributes to the poor prognosis of diabetic neuropathy because it plays a key role in the pathogenesis of foot ulceration and autonomic neuropathy. Impairment of small nerve fibers is considered the earliest alteration in the course of diabetic neuropathy. Therefore, assessment of functional and morphological abnormalities of small nerve fibers may enable timely diagnosis. The definition, symptoms, and clinical significance of small-fiber neuropathy are considered in the present review. An apparently more complex interaction between small-fiber impairment and microcirculation is extensively discussed. Diagnostic modalities include morphometric and functional methods. Corneal confocal microscopy and punch skin biopsy are considered gold standards, but noninvasive functional tests are also diagnostically useful. However, in routine clinical practice, small-fiber neuropathy is diagnosed by its typical clinical presentation. Finally, prompt treatment should be initiated following diagnosis.

New vistas in the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy

New modalities are now available to improve the diagnosis of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN). The present review discusses the progress achieved in this area. First, the minimal diagnostic criteria have been better clarified. Moreover, there are now new bedside tests available, such as the indicator test Neuropad, NeuroQuick, Ipswich Touch Test (IpTT), Vibratip, NC-stat(®)/DPNCheck™ for automated nerve conduction study (NCS), tactile circumferential discriminator, steel ball-bearing, and SUDOSCAN(®), while more sophisticated modalities include skin biopsy and corneal confocal microscopy (CCM). Some tests can be used as screening tools, including primary care setting (Neuropad, IpTT, Vibratip, automated NCS), while others are more suitable for research, including evaluation of DPN in prospective studies (CCM, skin biopsy). Importantly, there is some evidence of earlier DPN diagnosis with the aid of some tests (Neuropad, skin biopsy, CCM). Further advantages provided by different tests are educational value and self-examination. Thus far, the potential of these tests has not been fully utilised. In particular, they have not been validated against standardised clinical examination scores in terms of predicting foot ulcers and amputations. Hence, it now remains to investigate the potential benefits from the widespread use of these tests for earlier and easier diagnosis of DPN in the everyday clinic.

A simple plaster for screening for diabetic neuropathy: a diagnostic test accuracy systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Neuropad is an adhesive indicator test applied at the plantar surface of the foot that detects sweating through color change. We examined the diagnostic accuracy of this simple plaster as triage test for screening for clinically relevant diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy in adult outpatients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

MATERIALS/METHODS

Systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies. We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Biosis Previews, Web of Science, Scopus and gray literature without date or language restrictions. We pooled estimates of sensitivity and specificity, and fitted hierarchical models to produce summary receiver operating characteristic curves. We assessed methodological quality of included studies utilizing the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool.

RESULTS

Eighteen studies with 3470 participants met the inclusion criteria. Average sensitivity and specificity were 86% (95% CI 79 to 91) and 65% (95% CI 51 to 76) respectively. Likelihood ratios (LRs) were LR+=2.44 and LR-=0.22. Subgroup analyses per reference standard utilized provided similar estimates. Most studies were at risk of bias for patient selection and use of index or reference test, and had concerns regarding applicability due to patient selection.

CONCLUSION

The adhesive indicator test has reasonable sensitivity and could be used for triage of diabetic neuropathy to rule out foot at risk. Patients who tested positive should be referred to specialized care to establish a definite diagnosis. There is insufficient evidence for effectiveness on patient-important outcomes and cost-effectiveness of implementation in the diagnostic pathway compared with the standard clinical examination.

Influence of peripheral arterial occlusive disease on the Neuropad(®) test performance in patients with diabetes

AIMS

The specificity of the Neuropad(®) test to screen for peripheral neuropathy is moderate, but this test has several advantages, such as self-use, educative value and good sensitivity. Use of the Neuropad is usually contra-indicated in the presence of peripheral arterial occlusive disease, a condition associated with skin dryness. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of peripheral arterial occlusive disease on the performance of the Neuropad for screening peripheral neuropathy, and to compare it with the monofilament test.

METHODS

We included 200 patients with diabetes. Peripheral neuropathy was defined by a neuropathy disability score ≥ 6. The Neuropad was determined as normal or abnormal at 10 and 20 min, respectively, and its performance was compared in patients with and without peripheral arterial occlusive disease diagnosed by colour duplex ultrasonography. The performances of the Neuropad and of the monofilament test were compared.

RESULTS

Prevalences of peripheral neuropathy and of peripheral arterial occlusive disease were 15.8 and 44%, respectively. At 10 min, sensitivity and negative predictive value were high (93.8 and 95.1%), while specificity and positive predictive value were poor (23.2 and 18.9%). The Neuropad performance was not significantly different between patients with and without arteriopathy. Between 10 and 20 min, there was significant loss of sensitivity and gain in specificity. The Neuropad at 10 min was more sensitive but less specific than the monofilament test.

CONCLUSIONS

The reliability of the Neuropad is not significantly different in the presence or absence of peripheral arterial occlusive disease.

A simple new non-invasive sweat indicator test for the diagnosis of diabetic neuropathy

A simple non-invasive indicator test (Neuropad(®)) has been developed for the assessment of sweating and, hence, cholinergic innervation in the diabetic foot. The present review summarizes current knowledge on this diagnostic test. The diagnostic ability of this test is based on a colour change from blue to pink at 10 min, with excellent reproducibility, which lends itself to patient self-examination. It has a high sensitivity (65.1-100%) and negative predictive value (63-100%), with moderate specificity (32-78.5%) and positive predictive value (23.3-93.2%) for the diagnosis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. It also has moderate to high sensitivity (59.1-89%) and negative predictive value (64.7-91%), but low to moderate specificity (27-78%) and positive predictive value (24-48.6%) for the diagnosis of diabetic cardiac autonomic neuropathy. There are some data to suggest that Neuropad can detect early diabetic neuropathy, but this needs further evaluation. It remains to be established whether this test can predict foot ulceration and amputation, thereby contributing to the identification of high-risk patients.

Useful application of the Neuropad test for assessment of diabetic polyneuropathy

OBJECTIVE

Examination of sudomotor function is now recommended to assess peripheral autonomic dysfunction. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical usefulness of Neuropad, a simple visual indicator test, for assessment of diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN).

METHODS

This study examined 87 diabetic patients with a mean age of 61.1±8.8 years, a mean diabetes duration of 13.0±7.5 years and a mean HbA1c of 8.8±1.7%. Diagnosis of DPN was based on clinical examinations using modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS). The patients also underwent 4-g monofilament test and heart rate variability by coefficient of variation of R-R intervals (CV(R-R)) was determined with the patients at rest. The Neuropad test was applied on the plantar aspect of the great toe and removed after 10 minutes to evaluate the color change as normal (blue to completely pink), patchy (patches of blue and pink) and abnormal (remained blue).

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients showed a normal, 45 patchy and 14 abnormal response to the Neuropad test. Patients with an abnormal response had significantly longer diabetes duration than those with a normal or a patchy response, but HbA1c levels were similar among the three groups. The C(R-R) at rest was significantly lower in patients with an abnormal response than those of normal and patchy response, respectively. Abnormal responders showed significantly higher mTCNS and lower monofilament results as well as higher prevalence of orthostatic hypotension, retinopathy or nephropathy than normal responders.

CONCLUSION

The Neuropad test is a useful screening test for detecting DPN.

Screening for the high-risk foot of ulceration: tests of somatic and autonomic nerve function

Diabetic foot ulcers affect almost 5% of the patients with diabetes and carry a huge physical, emotional, and financial burden. Almost 80% of amputations in patients with diabetes are preceded by a foot ulcer. The need for simple screening methods for prevention of foot ulcers and amputations is indisputable. Simple tests such as monofilament, tuning fork, vibration perception threshold determination, ankle reflexes, and pinprick sensation alone or in combination have been studied prospectively and can be used for identification of patients at risk. Newer tests examining sudomotor dysfunction and skin dryness have been introduced in recent years. In cross-sectional studies sudomotor dysfunction assessed by either sympathetic skin response or NEUROPAD™ (Miro Verbandstoffe GmbH, Wiehl-Drabenderhöhe, Germany) testing has been consistently associated with foot ulceration. In addition, NEUROPAD™ testing is simple, reproducible, and widely available and has a high sensitivity for the diagnosis of clinical or subclinical diabetic polyneuropathy. Prospective studies are required to establish whether sudomotor dysfunction can predict foot ulcers and if simple methods assessing sudomotor dysfunction (eg, NEUROPAD™ testing) can be included in the screening tests for the prevention of this complication.

Accuracy of the Neuropad test for the diagnosis of distal symmetric polyneuropathy in type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the accuracy of Neuropad for the diagnosis and staging of distal symmetric polyneuropathy (DPN) across different stages of neuropathy, using multiple-level likelihood ratios (LRs) to interpret the time necessary to complete the color change of the test.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional, cohort-type diagnostic accuracy study in 251 consecutive adult type 2 diabetic patients with no peripheral arterial disease or other potential causes of neuropathy, who were recruited between January 2005 and December 2008 from the diabetes outpatient clinics in Alexandroupolis Hospital, Greece. Patients were tested for DPN by means of the neuropathy disability score (NDS) and Neuropad. Multiple-level LRs for time to complete color change were calculated across different stages of neuropathy.

RESULTS

The areas under the curve for the diagnosis of any (NDS of ≥3), at least moderate (NDS of ≥6), or severe (NDS of ≥9) DPN were 0.91, 0.96, and 0.97, respectively. The calculation of multiple-level LRs showed that time to complete color change <360 s suggested the absence of neuropathy. Values between 360 and 1,000 s were indicative of mild neuropathy. Finally, values between 1,000 and 1,200 or >1,200 s were strongly suggestive of moderate or severe DPN, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Neuropad could be used as a triage test for the diagnosis and staging of DPN in patients with type 2 diabetes, prompting referral to specialized care setting.

The ECG vertigo in diabetes and cardiac autonomic neuropathy

The importance of diabetes in the epidemiology of cardiovascular diseases cannot be overemphasized. About one third of acute myocardial infarction patients have diabetes, and its prevalence is steadily increasing. The decrease in cardiac mortality in people with diabetes is lagging behind that of the general population. Cardiovascular disease is a broad term which includes any condition causing pathological changes in blood vessels, cardiac muscle or valves, and cardiac rhythm. The ECG offers a quick, noninvasive clinical and research screen for the early detection of cardiovascular disease in diabetes. In this paper, the clinical and research value of the ECG is readdressed in diabetes and in the presence of cardiac autonomic neuropathy.

New diagnostic tests for diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy

Neuropathy needs to be diagnosed early to prevent complications, such as neuropathic pain or the diabetic foot. It is obvious that diagnosis of neuropathy needs to be improved. New peripheral nerve function tests that appear to facilitate diagnosis are now emerging. This review outlines the new tests that have been proposed for the diagnosis of diabetic distal symmetric polyneuropathy, the commonest form of neuropathy in diabetes. New tests are classified into those mainly assessing large-fiber function (tactile circumferential discriminator, steel ball-bearing, and automated nerve conduction study) and those mainly assessing small-fiber function (NeuroQuick and Neuropad). Emerging tests are promising but must be evaluated in prospective studies. Moreover, their cost-effectiveness needs more careful appraisal. The clinician should, therefore, still rely on established modalities to diagnose neuropathy, but wider use of the new tests is expected in the near future.

Association between foot temperature and sudomotor dysfunction in type 2 diabetes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Increased foot skin temperature has been described as a feature of diabetic neuropathy. The aim of this present study was to investigate the association between foot temperature and sudomotor dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 51 patients (group A: 25 men, mean age 61.14 +/- 6.11 years) without sudomotor dysfunction and 52 patients (group B: 25 men, mean age 59.54 +/- 6.18 years) with sudomotor dysfunction. Sudomotor dysfunction was defined as time until complete Neuropad color change from blue to pink exceeding 600 s in at least one foot. Time until complete color change of the test was also recorded. Foot skin temperature was measured with a handheld infrared thermometer on the plantar aspect of the foot at the level of the first metatarsal head.

RESULTS

On both feet, temperature was significantly higher in group B than in group A (right foot, group A versus group B, 30.62 +/- 1.13 degrees C versus 32.12 +/- 1.06 degrees C, p < .001; left foot, group A versus group B, 30.65 +/- 1.06 degrees C versus 32.19 +/- 1.10 degrees C, p < .001). There was a significant positive correlation between time to complete Neuropad color change and foot skin temperature (right foot, r = 0.742, p < .001; left foot, r = 0.758, p < .001), which was confirmed in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with sudomotor dysfunction have significantly higher foot temperature than those without sudomotor dysfunction. Foot temperature is positively correlated with severity of sudomotor dysfunction, as evaluated by the time to complete Neuropad color change.

Moisture status of the skin of the feet assessed by the visual test neuropad correlates with foot ulceration in diabetes

OBJECTIVE

To examine the association between the moisture status of the skin of the feet with foot ulceration in subjects with diabetes.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A total of 379 subjects with diabetes were examined. Assessment of peripheral neuropathy was based on neuropathy symptom score, neuropathy disability score, vibration perception threshold, and the 10-g monofilament perception. The moisture status of the skin of the feet was assessed using the visual test Neuropad.

RESULTS

Patients with foot ulceration had more severe peripheral neuropathy and more often an abnormal Neuropad response. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that the odds of foot ulceration increased with measures of neuropathy but increased also with an abnormal Neuropad response.

CONCLUSIONS

An abnormal Neuropad response correlates with foot ulceration in subjects with diabetes. This finding, if confirmed prospectively, suggests that the Neuropad test may be included in the screening tests for the prediction of foot ulceration.

Neuropad as a diagnostic tool for diabetic autonomic and sensorimotor neuropathy

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of the Neuropad sudomotor test for diabetic cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) and diabetic polyneuropathy (DPN), the latter assessed using a multi-level diagnostic approach.

METHODS

In 51 diabetic patients, CAN, symptoms and signs of DPN, vibration perception threshold (VPT), cold (CTT) and warm thermal perception thresholds (WTT) were measured. Neuropad response was determined as normal (complete colour change) or abnormal (absent or incomplete colour change). The time until the complete colour change (CCC time) was recorded.

RESULTS

CCC time showed significant correlations with all the neurological parameters, the strongest of which were with Valsalva ratio (rho = -0.64, P < 0.0001), symptoms of DPN (rho = 0.66, P < 0.0001), postural hypotension (rho = 0.54, P = 0.0001) and CTT (rho = -0.54, P = 0.0001). CCC time showed moderate diagnostic accuracy for both CAN and DPN: the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were 0.71 and 0.76, respectively. The diagnostic characteristics of three cut-off values of CCC time, identified by ROC analysis (i.e. 10, 15 and 18 min), were analysed. Compared with 10 min, the 15-min cut-off value provided better specificity (from 27% to 52% and from 31% to 62% for CAN and DPN, respectively) and a better likelihood ratio for negative result (from 0.67 to 0.34 and from 0.58 to 0.33) without lowering sensitivity (from 82% to 82% and from 85% to 80%).

CONCLUSIONS

Neuropad is a reliable diagnostic tool for both CAN and DPN, albeit of only moderate accuracy. Extending the observation period to 15 min provides greater diagnostic usefulness.