Long-term prognostic importance of diabetes after a myocardial infarction depends on left ventricular systolic function

A history of diabetes predicts outcomes following myocardial infarction: an analysis of the 28 771 patients in the High-Risk MI Database

AIMS

To examine the impact of diabetes mellitus on long-term clinical outcomes in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by clinical signs of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular dysfunction (LVD).

METHODS AND RESULTS

The High-Risk MI Database consists of individual data from 28 771 patients and was created by merging four large recent randomized clinical trials (VALIANT, EPHESUS, OPTIMAAL, and CAPRICORN) that each examined the impact of pharmacological interventions following MI in patients with evidence of HF or LVD. The mean age of patients was 65 years, 70% were male, and almost 94% Caucasian. Overall, 7368 (26%) had a history of diabetes. All the major outcomes were adjudicated by independent end-point committees. Strong and highly significant associations were found with all major clinical outcomes. Diabetes was associated with an increased risk for all-cause death [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.37; confidence interval (CI) 1.28-1.46; P < 0.001]. The higher risk for all-cause death was largely mediated by higher risk for cardiovascular death (adjusted HR 1.38; CI 1.27-1.48; P < 0.001) predominantly due to a substantially increased risk for fatal re-infarction (adjusted HR 1.78; CI 1.42-2.23; P < 0.001). Additionally, diabetes was associated with an increased risk for hospitalizations, particularly HF hospitalization (adjusted HR 1.50; CI 1.39-1.63; P < 0.001). There were also elevated risks for composite outcomes, particularly death or hospitalization due to HF (adjusted HR 1.48; CI 1.38-1.59; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The risk for adverse outcomes associated with diabetes remains elevated even after debut of coronary artery disease in patients with MI complicated by clinical signs of HF or LVD. This association is particularly strong for HF-related outcomes.

Long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction among individuals with and without diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis of studies in the post-reperfusion era

AIMS

To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis with the aim of providing robust estimates of the association between diabetes and long-term (≥1 year) mortality after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Medline, Embase and Web of Science databases were searched (January 1985 to July 2016) for terms related to long-term mortality, diabetes and AMI. Two authors independently abstracted the data. Hazard ratios (HRs) comparing mortality in people with and without diabetes were pooled across studies using Bayesian random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 10 randomized controlled trials and 56 cohort studies, including 714 780 patients, reported an estimated total of 202 411 deaths over the median (range) follow-up of 2.0 (1-20) years. The risk of death over time was significantly higher among those with diabetes compared with those without (unadjusted HR 1.82, 95% credible interval [CrI] 1.73-1.91). Mortality remained higher in the analysis restricted to 23/64 cohorts reporting data adjusted for confounders (adjusted HR 1.48, 95% CrI 1.43-1.53). The excess long-term mortality in diabetes was evident irrespective of the phenotype and modern treatment of AMI, and persisted in early survivors (unadjusted HR 1.82, 95% CrI 1.70-1.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite medical advances, individuals with diabetes have a 50% greater long-term mortality compared with those without. Further research to understand the determinants of this excess risk are important for public health, given the predicted rise in global diabetes prevalence.

Zofenopril and Ramipril in Combination with Acetyl Salicylic Acid in Postmyocardial Infarction Patients with Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction: A Retrospective Analysis of the SMILE-4 Randomized, Double-Blind Study in Diabetic Patients

OBJECTIVE

In the SMILE-4 study, zofenopril + acetyl salicylic acid (ASA) was more effective than ramipril + ASA on 1-year prevention of major cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular dysfunction. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated drug efficacy in subgroups of patients, according to a history of diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

The primary study endpoint was 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. Diabetes was defined according to medical history (previous known diagnosis).

RESULTS

A total of 562 of 693 (81.0%) patients were classified as nondiabetics and 131 (18.9%) as diabetics. The adjusted rate of MACE was lower under zofenopril than under ramipril in both nondiabetics [27.9% vs. 34.9% ramipril; odds ratio, OR and 95% confidence interval: 0.55 (0.35, 0.86)] and diabetics [30.9% vs. 41.3%; 0.56 (0.18, 1.73)], although the difference was statistically significant only for the nondiabetic group (P = 0.013). Zofenopril was superior to ramipril as regards to the primary study endpoint in the subgroup of 157 patients with uncontrolled blood glucose (≥ 126 mg/dL), regardless of a previous diagnosis of diabetes [0.31 (0.10, 0.90), P = 0.030]. Zofenopril significantly reduced the risk of hospitalization for cardiovascular causes in both nondiabetics [0.64 (0.43, 0.96), P = 0.030] and diabetics [0.38 (0.15, 0.95), P = 0.038], whereas it was not better than ramipril in terms of prevention of cardiovascular deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective analysis of the SMILE-4 study confirmed the good efficacy of zofenopril plus ASA in the prevention of long-term MACE also in the subgroup of patients with diabetes mellitus.

Different prognostic factors according to left ventricular systolic function in patients with acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Initial left ventricular (LV) systolic function is a main determinant of clinical outcomes in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study was performed to investigate whether AMI patients have different prognostic factors according to their baseline LV systolic function.

METHODS

A total of 12,988 patients with AMI from a nationwide database were analyzed. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) within 12months of AMI, including death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and revascularization, were assessed.

RESULTS

Patients were stratified into two groups according to LV ejection fraction (LVEF): those with LVEF<40% and those with LVEF≥40%. Patients with LVEF<40% (n=1962, 15.1%) were older and had more unfavorable cardiovascular risk factors than those with LVEF≥40% (n=11,026, 84.9%). The rate of MACE was higher in patients with LVEF<40% than in those with LVEF≥40% (26.8% vs 11.4%, p<0.001). Independent predictors of 12-month MACEs in patients with LVEF≥40% were history of MI, high Killip stage, three-vessel disease, and lower renal function, which are already known as risk factors. However, diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio [HR], 1.68; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.17-2.40; p=0.008), and the use of rennin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95; p=0.029) were independent factors for 12-month MACE in patients with LVEF <40%.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic factors determining 12-month MACE after AMI are different according to LVEF. Management following AMI should be tailored according to their LV systolic function.