Associations of Mid- and Late-Life Severe Hypoglycemic Episodes With Incident Dementia Among Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Effect of hypoglycemic events on cognitive function in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a dose-response meta-analysis

Background

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is widely acknowledged as a vital warning sign contributing to cognitive dysfunction. However, there is still a lack of consensus on whether hypoglycemic events resulting from poor glycemic control increase the risk of cognitive dysfunction in people with diabetes, and the potential dose-response correlation between hypoglycemic events and cognitive dysfunction remains unexplored. The primary objective of the current study was to assess the contribution of hypoglycemic events to cognitive dysfunction in T2DM patients and the dose-response correlation between the two.

Methods

A comprehensive search of nine major databases was executed from inception to May 2023. We screened all observational studies examining the connection between hypoglycemia and cognitive dysfunction. The DerSimonian-Laird method was used to compute the combined risk ratio (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI). Additionally, dose-response analysis was employed to investigate the correlation between the frequency of hypoglycemia and the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction.

Results

A total of 30 studies of different levels in 17 articles with 3,961,352 participants were included in this review. The pooled RR for the connection of hypoglycemia and the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction was 1.47 (95% CI: 1.35-1.60). Subgroup analyses showed that the pooled RR for the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction was 1.20 (95% CI: 1.11-1.31) for one episode of hypoglycemia, 1.41 (95% CI: 1.05-1.88) for two episodes of hypoglycemia, and 1.62 (95% CI: 1.20-2.91) for three or more episodes of hypoglycemia. Dose-response analysis showed a linear dose-response relationship between hypoglycemia and the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction (exp (b) = 1.178694, z = 7.12, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Our investigations demonstrated a 47% heightened likelihood of cognitive dysfunction in individuals with hypoglycemia compared to those without. Furthermore, the likelihood of cognitive dysfunction climbed by 17.87% for every subsequent episode of hypoglycemia. Therefore, long-term monitoring of blood glucose, periodic screening of cognitive function, and moderate health education should be encouraged, which will be beneficial for people with diabetes to prevent hypoglycemic events and cognitive dysfunction.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42023432352.

Association of hypoglycemic events with cognitive impairment in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Protocol for a dose-response meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

With an incidence rate as high as 46%-58%, hypoglycemia is a common complication of glycemic management among those suffering from type 2 diabetes mellitus(T2DM). According to preclinical research, hypoglycemia episodes may impair cognition by harming neurons. However, there is still controversy regarding the clinical evidence for the relationship between hypoglycemic events and the likelihood of cognitive impairment. Furthermore, little research has been done on the dose-response association between hypoglycemia incidents and the possibility of cognitive impairment. To address these knowledge gaps, the present research intends to update the comprehension of the association among hypoglycemic events and the risk of cognitive impairment and to clarify the correlation between dose and response by incorporating the most recent investigations.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

This work has developed a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis that will examine, via a well-organized assessment of several databases, the relationship between the incidence of hypoglycemia and the probability of cognitive impairment. Observational studies investigating the connection between hypoglycemia episodes and cognitive impairment will be included. The databases that will be searched are PubMed, Web of Science, the Chinese Biomedical Literature Database (CBM), Cochrane Library, Embase, the China National Knowledge (CNKI), Wan Fang, the Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database (VIP), and Du Xiu. Literature from the establishment of each database to December 2023 will be included in the search. Two researchers will independently screen the studies that satisfy the requirements for both inclusion and exclusion. A third researcher will be asked to mediate any disputes. The methodological caliber of the studies included will be assessed utilizing the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) or the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal method. With regard to GRADE, which stands for Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, the quality of the evidence will be evaluated. ROBIS Tool will be used to evaluate the risk of bias in the development of the systematic review. If the data is accessible, meta-analysis and dose-response curve analysis will be employed by Stata software. However, if the data does not allow for such analysis, a descriptive review will be performed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

Hypoglycemic episodes may raise the likelihood of cognitive impairment, according to earlier investigations. This study will update the relevant evidence and explore the dose-response connection between hypoglycemic episodes and cognitive impairment. The results of this review will have significant effects on decision-making by individuals with diabetes, healthcare providers, and government policy institutions.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Prospero registration number: CRD42023432352.

No association between metformin initiation and incident dementia in older adults newly diagnosed with diabetes

BACKGROUND

Metformin has been suggested to reduce dementia risk; however, most epidemiologic studies have been limited by immortal time bias or confounding due to disease severity.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association of metformin initiation with incident dementia using strategies that mitigate these important sources of bias.

METHODS

Residents of Ontario, Canada ≥66 years newly diagnosed with diabetes from January 1, 2008 to December 31, 2017 entered this retrospective population-based cohort. To consider the indication for metformin monotherapy initiation, people with hemoglobin A1c of 6.5%-8.0% and estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥45 mL/min/1.73 m2 were selected. Using the landmark method to address immortal time bias, exposure was grouped into "metformin monotherapy initiation within 180 days after new diabetes diagnosis" or "no glucose-lowering medications within 180 days." To address disease latency, 1-year lag time was applied to the end of the 180-day landmark period. Incident dementia was defined using a validated algorithm for Alzheimer's disease and related dementias. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) and confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated from propensity-score weighted Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Over mean follow-up of 6.77 years from cohort entry, metformin initiation within 180 days after new diabetes diagnosis (N = 12,331; 978 events; 65,762 person-years) showed no association with dementia risk (aHR [95% CI] = 1.05 [0.96-1.15]), compared to delayed or no glucose-lowering medication initiation (N = 22,369; 1768 events; 117,415 person-years).

CONCLUSION

Early metformin initiation was not associated with incident dementia in older adults newly diagnosed with diabetes. The utility of metformin to prevent dementia was not supported.