Clinical and neurophysiological studies of aldose reductase inhibitor ponalrestat in chronic symptomatic diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Physiological and Pathological Roles of Aldose Reductase

Aldose reductase (AR) is an aldo-keto reductase that catalyzes the first step in the polyol pathway which converts glucose to sorbitol. Under normal glucose homeostasis the pathway represents a minor route of glucose metabolism that operates in parallel with glycolysis. However, during hyperglycemia the flux of glucose via the polyol pathway increases significantly, leading to excessive formation of sorbitol. The polyol pathway-driven accumulation of osmotically active sorbitol has been implicated in the development of secondary diabetic complications such as retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy. Based on the notion that inhibition of AR could prevent these complications a range of AR inhibitors have been developed and tested; however, their clinical efficacy has been found to be marginal at best. Moreover, recent work has shown that AR participates in the detoxification of aldehydes that are derived from lipid peroxidation and their glutathione conjugates. Although in some contexts this antioxidant function of AR helps protect against tissue injury and dysfunction, the metabolic transformation of the glutathione conjugates of lipid peroxidation-derived aldehydes could also lead to the generation of reactive metabolites that can stimulate mitogenic or inflammatory signaling events. Thus, inhibition of AR could have both salutary and injurious outcomes. Nevertheless, accumulating evidence suggests that inhibition of AR could modify the effects of cardiovascular disease, asthma, neuropathy, sepsis, and cancer; therefore, additional work is required to selectively target AR inhibitors to specific disease states. Despite past challenges, we opine that a more gainful consideration of therapeutic modulation of AR activity awaits clearer identification of the specific role(s) of the AR enzyme in health and disease.

Evolving concepts on the role of dyslipidemia, bioenergetics, and inflammation in the pathogenesis and treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most widespread and disabling neurological conditions, accounting for half of all neuropathy cases worldwide. Despite its high prevalence, no approved disease modifying therapies exist. There is now a growing body of evidence that DPN secondary to type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) represents different disease processes, with T2DM DPN best understood within the context of metabolic syndrome rather than hyperglycemia. In this review, we highlight currently understood mechanisms of DPN, along with their corresponding potential therapeutic targets. We frame this discussion within a practical overview of how the field evolved from initial human observations to murine pathomechanistic and therapeutic models into ongoing and human clinical trials, with particular emphasis on T2DM DPN and metabolic syndrome.

Systematic review of treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy

AIM

To evaluate treatment options for neuropathic pain and sensory symptoms resulting from diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet.

METHODS

The databases PubMed, Embase and Web-of-Science were searched for randomized controlled trials, published in the period from database inception to 2 July 2015, that evaluated treatments for diabetic peripheral neuropathy of the feet with placebo or standard treatment as comparators. Participants in these trials included people with diabetes mellitus and diabetic peripheral neuropathy who were given any treatment for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Risk of bias was assessed using the Delphi list of criteria. Data from the trials were extracted using standardized data extraction sheets by two authors independently. All analyses were performed using RevMan 5.2. In case of clinical homogeneity, statistical pooling was performed using a random effects model.

RESULTS

This review included 27 trials on pharmacological, non-pharmacological and alternative treatments. In the meta-analysis of trials of α-lipoic acid versus placebo, total symptom score was reduced by -2.45 (95% CI -4.52; -0.39) with 600 mg i.v. α-lipoic acid (three trials), and was reduced by -1.95 (95% CI -2.89; -1.01) with 600 mg oral α-lipoic acid (two trials). Significant improvements in diabetic peripheral neuropathy symptoms were found with opioids, botulinum toxin A, mexidol, reflexology and Thai foot massage, but not with micronutrients, neurotrophic peptide ORG 2677 and photon stimulation therapy.

CONCLUSION

In this review, we found that α-lipoic acid, opioids, botulinum toxin A, mexidol, reflexology and Thai foot massage had significant beneficial results.

Aldose reductase inhibitors for the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy

BACKGROUND

Polyneuropathy, a common complication of diabetes mellitus, causes pain and sensory and motor deficits in the limbs, and is also an important independent predictor of foot ulceration. Inhibiting the metabolism of glucose by the polyol pathway using aldose reductase inhibitors is a potential mechanism to slow or reverse the neuropathy's progression.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of aldose reductase inhibitors on the progression of symptoms, signs or functional disability in diabetic polyneuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Trials Register, MEDLINE (from January 1966 to May 2007), EMBASE (from January 1980 to May 2007) and LILACS (from 1982 to May 2007). We reviewed bibliographies of randomized trials identified, and contacted authors and experts in the field.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials comparing an aldose reductase inhibitor with control, and lasting at least six months. The primary outcome measure was change in neurological function, measured in various ways, including strength testing, sensory examination, and composite scores of neurological examination. Secondary outcome measures were nerve conduction studies, neuropathic symptoms, quality of life, occurrence of foot ulcers and adverse effects.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trials included in the review were selected and assessed independently by at least two of us. Methodological criteria and study results were recorded on data extraction forms.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-two randomized controlled trials meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Many had significant methodological flaws. Change in neurological function, our primary outcome measure, was assessed in 29 trials, but sufficient data for meta-analysis were only available in 13 studies, involving 879 treated participants and 909 controls. There was no overall significant difference between the treated and control groups (SMD -0.25, 95% CI -0.56 to 0.05), although one subgroup analysis (four trials using tolrestat) favored treatment. A benefit for neuropathic symptoms was suggested by a group of trials using a dichotomized endpoint (improvement or not), but this was contradicted by another group of trials which measured symptoms on a continuous scale. There was no overall benefit on nerve conduction parameters (27 studies) or foot ulceration (one study). Quality of life was not assessed in any of the studies. While most adverse events were infrequent and minor, three compounds had dose limiting adverse events that lead to their withdrawal from human use: severe hypersensitivity reactions with sorbinil, elevation of creatinine with zenarestat, and alteration of liver function with tolrestat.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no statistically significant difference between aldose reductase inhibitors and placebo in the treatment of diabetic polyneuropathy. Any future clinical trials of aldose reductase inhibitors should be restricted to compounds proven to have substantial biological or preclinical advantages over previously tested agents.

Clinical Potential of Aldose Reductase Inhibitors in Diabetic Neuropathy

A number of aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) have been developed over the past few decades with the expectation of therapeutic effects for diabetic complications. Neuropathy is the complication that has been most intensively studied as a potential target for ARIs. Most ARIs have shown satisfactory effects in animal models. However, the clinical potential of ARIs in diabetic patients has been controversial due to the lack of conclusive evidence. The safety of this category of drugs is also uncertain. This article summarizes the results of clinical trials of ARIs for patients with diabetic neuropathy that have been performed to date. The efficacy and toxicity of each ARI will be briefly assessed by the clinical data. The theoretical background along with major issues in the evaluation of drug efficacy will also be discussed. Overall the observed efficacy varied among the compounds. A few ARIs showed favorable effects in multiple endpoints in the majority of trials, while the results from many ARIs seemed ambivalent. One drug barely exhibited positive effects on any endpoint. This discrepancy may be attributable at least in part to the different degree of inhibition of the polyol pathway in nerve tissues, which is determined not only by the pharmacokinetic properties of the drug but also by its penetration into nerve tissues. In addition to the uncertain potential of each ARI, the issues of design and analytical methods used for clinical trials may underlie the ambivalent outcomes. The power of analysis and the duration of trials were apparently inadequate in a large number of the studies. Various indices selected as endpoints are not necessarily sensitive or reproducible. Studies of longer duration, large-scale trials, better methods to assess neuropathy, and the selection of patients with a homogenous background would provide more conclusive evidence. The risk of serious adverse reactions, for example, hypersensitivity reactions and hepatic damage, has led to some ARIs being withdrawn from the market or from further development. These adverse effects, however, do not appear to result from the inhibition of aldose reductase activity per se but from specific reactions to each compound. In conclusion, sufficient inhibition of the nerve aldose reductase activity seems likely to prevent or ameliorate diabetic neuropathy, and further development of more potent and safe ARIs is necessary before extensive clinical application.

Minalrestat, an aldose reductase inhibitor, corrects the impaired microvascular reactivity in diabetes

We demonstrated that aldose reductase inhibition corrects the impaired microvascular responses to inflammatory mediators in diabetic rats. To study the mechanism involved in the restoring effect of aldose reductase inhibition, we examined the effects of minalrestat, another aldose reductase inhibitor, on the responses of mesenteric microvessels studied in vivo to permeability-increasing agents in diabetic and galactosemic rats. The diabetic group was treated from 3 days after the alloxan injection with minalrestat (10 mg/kg/day) for 30 days and the minalrestat treatment (10 mg/kg/day/7 days) of galactosemic rats started concomitantly with the induction of galactosemia. The mesenteric microvessel reactivity was studied using intravital microscopy and changes in vessel diameters were estimated after the topical application of vasoactive agents. The impaired responses to bradykinin, histamine, and platelet-activating factor of arterioles and venules observed in diabetic and galactosemic rats were completely prevented by minalrestat. Neither diabetes nor galactosemia affected responses to acetylcholine and sodium nitroprusside. Responses to these agents were not modified by aldose reductase inhibition. The restoring effect of minalrestat was reversed by inhibition of nitric oxide (NO) synthesis with N(omega)-nitro-L-arginine methyl ester, by blocking K(+) channel with tetraethylammonium but not by cyclooxygenase inhibition with diclofenac. Therefore, we concluded that NO, membrane hyperpolarization, but not cyclooxygenase products are involved in the beneficial effect of minalrestat on the microvascular reactivity in diabetes. Together, these findings led us to suggest that aldose reductase inhibition might ameliorate diabetic complications through the correction of the altered microvascular reactivity by a mechanism that involves NO and membrane hyperpolarization.

Symmetry of nerve conduction studies in different stages of diabetic polyneuropathy

Nerve conduction studies (NCS) in diabetic sensorimotor polyneuropathy (DSP) are sensitive, noninvasive, and associated with small coefficients of variation, and correlate well with underlying peripheral nerve morphological change. For these reasons, the current reference standard for DSP involves multivariate instruments that emphasize NCS results. However, the interside symmetry of NCS findings in different stages of DSP are unknown, although requirement for symmetry has been suggested in clinical trials of DSP. We therefore aimed to determine the degree of symmetry of NCS findings in DSP of differing severity stages. A cohort of diabetic patients, including patients without neuropathy and those with mild to severe DSP, was studied. We also studied a series of nondiabetic, healthy subjects. A variation of stratified sampling by means of a clinical neuropathy score ensured that a broad spectrum of neuropathy was studied. A total of 478 subjects was ascertained; patient accrual was discontinued when the smallest clinical group consisted of 50 subjects. Nerve conduction studies were conducted prospectively and in a blinded fashion using surface recordings, averaging for sensory action potentials, control of limb temperature, and standardized techniques. Median and ulnar motor and sensory, peroneal and tibial motor, and sural NCS were performed. Interside symmetry, independent of neuropathy severity, was observed for all investigated nerves, except for the median sensory nerve action potential amplitude, which was lower on the right side. These results confirm that abnormal NCS findings consistent with DSP are reliably symmetrical with the exception of the amplitude of the median sensory nerve action potential. Thus, unilateral evaluation of NCS in DSP is sufficient as a reference standard in clinical trials. We also conclude that great degrees of asymmetry in NCS results are reason to question inclusion of DSP patients in clinical trials.

Diabetic neuropathy--a continuing enigma

In this article we will review the clinical signs and symptoms of diabetic somatic polyneuropathy (DPN), its prevalence and clinical management. Staging and classification of DPN will be exemplified by various staging paradigms of varied sophistication. The results of therapeutic clinical trials will be summarized. The pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy reviews an extremely complex issue that is still not fully understood. Various recent advances in the understanding of the disease will be discussed, particularly with respect to the differences between neuropathy in the two major types of diabetes. The neuropathology and natural history of diabetic neuropathy will be discussed pointing out the heterogeneities of the disease. Finally, the various prospective therapeutic avenues will be dealt with and discussed.

Aldose reductase inhibitors for the prevention and treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of aldose reductase inhibitors in the prevention, reversal or delay in the progression of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Diabetes Group's database was searched and the citation lists of identified trials and previous reviews checked. Investigators identified as active in the field were approached for overlooked studies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials of aldose reductase inhibitors versus placebo, no treatment or other treatment in diabetic patients with or without clinical neuropathy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Nerve conduction velocity was the only end point measured in all trials. Treatment effect was evaluated in terms of nerve conduction velocity mean difference in median and peroneal motor and median and sural sensory nerves.

MAIN RESULTS

19 trials, testing 4 different aldose reductase inhibitors for between 4 to 208 weeks duration (median 24 weeks), met the inclusion criteria for the meta-analysis. A small but statistically significant reduction in decline of median and peroneal motor nerve conduction velocities was present in the treated group when compared to the control group (weighted mean 0.66 m/s 95% CI 0.18-1.14 m/s and 0.53 m/s 95% CI 0.02-1.04m/s respectively). No clear benefit of aldose reductase inhibitor treatment was observed in either of the sensory nerves.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Although aldose reductase inhibitor treatment has been demonstrated to diminsh the reduction in motor nerve conduction velocity, the clinical relevance of such a change in this outcome measure is uncertain. There was no effect in terms of this outcome measure in the smaller sensory fibres, degeneration of which is primarily responsible for the most common neuropathic syndrome associated with diabetes, that of severe pain and loss of sensation in the extremity leading in some cases to ulceration and eventual amputation.

The aldose reductase inhibitor sorbinil does not prevent the impairment in nitric oxide-mediated neurotransmission in anococcygeus muscle from diabetic rats

This study investigated whether increased polyol pathway activity could contribute to alterations in nitrergic neurotransmission in anococcygeus muscles from 8-week diabetic rats. In the presence of guanethidine (10-30 microM) and clonidine (0.01-0.05 microM), relaxations obtained to nitrergic nerve stimulation (0.5-5 Hz, 10-s train), to sodium nitroprusside (5-500 nM) and to nitric oxide (0.1-3 microM) were significantly reduced in muscles from diabetic rats compared to responses from control rats. Treatment of diabetic rats with the aldose reductase inhibitor sorbinil (42 mg/kg per day via feed for 8 weeks) did not affect impaired reactivity to nitrergic nerve stimulation, sodium nitroprusside or nitric oxide. The results suggest increased polyol pathway activity does not contribute to the alterations in nitrergic neurotransmission in anococcygeus muscles from diabetic rats.

Alterations of glomerular basement membrane charge and structure in diabetic nephropathy

We examined glomerular basement membrane anionic site distribution identified by cationic gold in seven patients with insulin-dependent and four patients with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, presenting a spectrum of clinical and glomerular changes. Anionic sites were investigated by pretreatment of tissue with glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzymes prior to cationic gold staining. The distribution of chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans--a previously unrecognized glomerular basement membrane component--and type IV collagen was examined by immunoelectron microscopy to identify structural changes in the basement membrane. Findings were compared with those of non-diabetic patients showing minor proteinuria and morphologically normal glomerular basement membranes. Two patients, originally diagnosed as having diabetic nephropathy were also examined at 19 weeks and 5 years after renal transplantation. Characteristic redistribution of type IV collagen and chondroitin sulphate proteoglycans was noted in thickened glomerular basement membrane segments (> 400 nm) of diabetic patients and those with renal transplants. Extension of anionic sites deep into the glomerular basement membrane at pH 2.5, together with loss of interna sites at pH 5.8 is unique to diabetic nephropathy. Reduced charge density was apparent in some patients due to thickening of the glomerular basement membrane, although the number of anionic sites per unit length of membrane was actually increased. Thus, charge aberration in diabetic nephropathy is due to displacement rather than loss of anionic sites. Removal of more than 90% of these sites by heparitinase, confirms their association with heparan sulphate proteoglycans. Similar derangement of anionic sites in all patients with diabetic nephropathy irrespective of the degree of proteinuria, suggests that a heparan sulphate proteoglycan-related charge barrier plays a minor role in controlling permeability of the diabetic glomerular basement membrane.

Impairment, disability, or handicap in peripheral neuropathy: analysis of the use of outcome measures in clinical trials in patients with peripheral neuropathies

Outcome measures can be classified into measures of impairment, disability, and handicap. To investigate the biological effect of treatment, measures of impairment are appropriate. Studies investigating whether patients benefit from treatment in terms of improvement of functional health, however, require disability or handicap measures. In a review of the medical literature between 1978 and 1993, 73 controlled intervention studies in patients with peripheral neuropathies were found. Disability or handicap measures were used in two of 54 studies in patients with diabetic neuropathy, in two of six studies in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy, in none of five studies in a mixed group of patients, and in all eight studies in patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome. The limited use of disability and handicap measures in patients with diabetic and mixed neuropathies can be explained by the experimental nature of most studies. In four of six studies, however, in patients with chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy or neuropathy associated with monoclonal gammopathy that were designed to assess effectiveness of treatment, the choice of outcome measures was not appropriate. It is concluded that in the design of intervention studies in patients with peripheral neuropathy more attention should be paid to a proper choice of suitable outcome measures to assess the effectiveness of treatment.

The efficacy of aldose reductase inhibitors in the management of diabetic complications. Comparison with intensive insulin treatment and pancreatic transplantation

Recently, aldose reductase inhibitors (ARIs) have been registered in several countries for the improvement of glycaemic control. However, their efficacy is still controversial. ARIs inhibit the enhanced flux of glucose through the polyol pathway. As such, they can never be more effective than normoglycaemia, and so their potential benefits and limitations should be considered relative to the effects of prolonged euglycaemia. The clinical effects of ARIs can be put into perspective by assessing the effects of improved glycaemic control attained in randomised trials of intensive insulin treatment [such as the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT)] and after pancreatic transplantation. Although direct comparison of these 3 interventions is hampered by differences in patient populations, duration and methods of follow-up and in the potency of ARIs, the effects of these 3 metabolic interventions and their course in time appear remarkably similar. For neuropathy, all 3 interventions induce an increase in average motor nerve conduction velocity of approximately 1 m/sec during the first months of treatment. At the same time, improvement of painful symptoms may occur. These changes probably largely represent a metabolic amelioration of the condition of the nerves. Around the second year of treatment with all 3 forms of metabolic improvement, an acceleration of nerve conduction of a similar magnitude occurs, with signs of structural nerve regeneration and some sensory recuperation. Experience with ARIs in nephropathy is still limited, but similar improvements in glomerular filtration rate and, less consistently, in urinary albumin excretion were found during short term normoglycaemia produced by all 3 forms of treatment. Comparison of a small number of studies, however, shows differences between intensive insulin regimens, pancreatic transplantation and ARIs in effects on retinopathy. Retinopathy often temporarily deteriorates in the early phases of improved glycaemic control, but this is not noted with ARIs. New microaneurysm formation was slightly reduced in a single long term study with the ARI sorbinil, but the preventive effects on the overall levels of retinopathy seemed less strong than in normoglycaemia trials of similar duration. However, the pharmacodynamic effects on inhibiting the polyol pathway differ among ARIs, and the half-life of the inhibiting effect of sorbinil may have been too short for a complete reduction of polyol pathway activity. The trials of prolonged intensive insulin therapy and pancreatic transplantation have demonstrated that very strict metabolic control must be maintained continuously for many years before a significant reduction of complications can be demonstrated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aldose reductase inhibition, nerve perfusion, oxygenation and function in streptozotocin-diabetic rats: dose-response considerations and independence from a myo-inositol mechanism

We examined the effects of aldose reductase inhibition on nerve biochemistry and function, blood flow and endoneurial oxygenation in experimental diabetes mellitus. After 1 month untreated diabetes in rats, treatment with the novel sulphonylnitromethane aldose reductase inhibitor, ZENECA ZD5522, prevented a progressive increase in sciatic nerve resistance to hypoxic conduction failure (p < 0.05). Motor conduction velocity deficits after 4 months untreated diabetes were rapidly returned to normal within 12 days (p < 0.0001) by ZD5522 treatment. Following 2-months untreated diabetes, examination of 1 month ZD5522 treatment dose-response relationships for correction of nerve sorbitol and fructose accumulations and reduction in myo-inositol concentration, sciatic motor and saphenous sensory conduction velocity and sciatic blood flow by laser-Doppler flowmetry revealed poor agreement between nerve function and biochemical indices. In addition, polyol accumulation differed between sciatic and saphenous nerves, the latter showing ten-fold lower sorbitol concentrations. Laser-Doppler blood flow was 60% decreased by untreated diabetes (p < 0.001) and there was a strong correlation between ZD5522-mediated increases in blood flow and conduction velocity (p < 0.0001). Measurement of nutritive endoneurial blood flow by microelectrode polarography and hydrogen clearance showed 44% and 45% deficits for 1 and 2 months untreated diabetes (p < 0.001) that were prevented by ponalrestat and ZD5522 treatments, respectively. In contrast, 2 months myo-inositol treatment from diabetes induction did not prevent reduction in blood flow or sciatic motor conduction velocity. A 37% reduction in endoneurial oxygen tension after 2 months diabetes (p < 0.001) was completely prevented by ZD5522 treatment (p < 0.001). The data show that a very high degree of polyol pathway blockade is necessary to correct nerve functional deficits and that aldose reductase inhibitors have a neurovascular action that does not depend on restoration of nerve myo-inositol.

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of the ACTH4-9 analogue ORG 2766 in IDDM patients with neuropathy

In this study we report a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to evaluate the effect of ORG 2766 in IDDM patients with peripheral neuropathy. Sixty-two patients were selected based on the following criteria: abnormal vibration perception threshold above the 95th-percentile adjusted for age and/or abnormal warm temperature threshold, both measured in the right hand. The patients were randomized into two treatment groups after baseline studies: Group 1 was treated with placebo and Group 2 was treated with 3 mg of the ACTH4-9 analogue ORG 2766 every 24 h. The total study period was 1 year. After 1 year of treatment there was a significant improvement in vibration threshold in Group 1 compared to Group 2. No other parameters improved in the study period. The number of patients selected may have been too small to detect a more important treatment effect. We conclude from this study that ORG 2766 can improve vibration threshold, indicating large myelinated fibre function, but does not affect any of the other neurophysiological function tests.

Aldose reductase inhibitors: an update

OBJECTIVE

To update readers on research being conducted with the aldose reductase inhibitor (ARI) tolrestat in treating complications of diabetes mellitus. The article briefly describes early investigations with other ARIs and reviews the more recent studies of tolrestat. In addition, the article gives readers a simplified overview of the biochemical background pertinent to the use of these agents.

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search was performed to identify articles relating to the clinical use of, and research involving, the following ARIs: sorbinil, alrestatin, ponalrestat, and tolrestat. In addition, pharmaceutical manufacturers were contacted in an attempt to obtain data relating to ongoing investigations.

STUDY SELECTION

Review articles and clinical trials of sorbinil, alrestatin, and ponalrestat were included. Articles dealing with clinical trials of tolrestat were selected from the MEDLINE search. As there were only a few trials, all studies identified were included. No additional written data were available from the manufacturers.

DATA SYNTHESIS

ARIs, which when first introduced were proclaimed to be major advances in treating diabetic complications, have never produced the expected results. Problems with efficacy and toxicity relegated most of this class of agents to historical interest. One compound, tolrestat, has continued to be tested and has potential clinical application. To date, the extent of benefit that has been realized in tolrestat-treated patients is small to moderate. Improvements have occurred in paresthesia and neuropathy, but unfortunately, not in pain symptoms. Adverse effects have been minor and are primarily confined to elevations of hepatic alanine aminotransferase. Additional clinical trials are being conducted with this agent.

CONCLUSION

Tolrestat is the only one of the original ARIs still undergoing clinical trials. Results so far have been encouraging, but by no means definitive, for improvement in some aspects of diabetic neuropathy. Information from ongoing investigations is necessary before the true usefulness of tolrestat therapy can be determined.

Treatment of diabetic autonomic neuropathy with an aldose reductase inhibitor

To evaluate the effects of the aldose reductase inhibitor Ponalrestat (Statil) on diabetic autonomic neuropathy, a double-blind placebo controlled trial was carried out on a group of 34 diabetic patients with documented cardiac autonomic neuropathy. After a 4-week, placebo run-in period, patients were randomised for treatment with 600 mg Statil or placebo for another 24 weeks. Moreover, the reliability of the autonomic nerve function tests was investigated by comparing the results at onset and at week 4. Fifteen patients treated with Statil and 12 with placebo completed the study. Neither symptom scores nor cardiovascular reflexes, pupil reflexes and skin vasomotor reflexes improved after Statil therapy, which led us to conclude that Statil is not effective in the treatment of diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Reliability coefficients for cardiovascular reflexes and pupil reflex showed high values, ranging from 60% to 80%. Therefore these methods are recommended in future therapy trials.

Origin of the microangiopathic changes in diabetes

The mechanism of development of microangiopathy is incompletely understood, but relates to a number of ultrastructural, biochemical and haemostatic processes. These include capillary basement membrane thickening, non-enzymatic glycosylation, possibly increased free radical activity, increased flux through the polyol pathway and haemostatic abnormalities. The central feature appears to be hyperglycaemia, which is causally related to the above processes and culminates in tissue ischaemia. This article will briefly describe these processes and will discuss possible pathogenic interactions which may lead to the development of the pathological lesion.

Dissociation between biochemical and functional effects of the aldose reductase inhibitor, ponalrestat, on peripheral nerve in diabetic rats

1. The aim of the study was to examine the effects in rats of two different doses of the aldose reductase inhibitor, ponalrestat, on functional measures of nerve conduction and sciatic nerve biochemistry. 2. After 1 month, streptozotocin-induced diabetes produced 22%, 23% and 15% deficits in conduction velocity of sciatic nerves supplying gastrocnemius and tibialis anterior muscles and saphenous sensory nerve respectively compared to controls. These deficits were maintained over 2 months diabetes. 3. Slower-conducting motor fibres supplying the interosseus muscles of the foot did not show a diabetic deficit compared to onset controls, however, there was a 13% reduction in conduction velocity after 2 months diabetes relative to age-matched controls, indicating a maturation deficit. 4. Resistance to hypoxic conduction failure was investigated for sciatic nerve trunks in vitro. There was an increase in the duration of hypoxia necessary for an 80% reduction in compound action potential amplitude with diabetes. This was progressive; after 1 month, hypoxia time was increased by 22% and after 2 months by 57%. 5. The effect of 1-month treatment with the aldose reductase inhibitor, ponalrestat, on the abnormalities caused by an initial month of untreated diabetes was examined. Two doses of ponalrestat were employed, 8 mg kg-1 day-1 (which is equivalent to, or greater than, the blockade employed in clinical trials), and 100 mg kg-1 day-1. 6. Sciatic nerve sorbitol content was increased 7 fold by diabetes. Both doses were effective in reducing this; 70% for 8 mg kg-1 day-1, and to within the control range for 100 mg kg-1 day-1.

Detection of colour vision abnormalities in uncomplicated type 1 diabetic patients with angiographically normal retinas

Colour vision function was assessed in 38 non-complicated type 1 diabetic patients in whom fluorescein angiography was normal, and was compared with that in 36 age-matched, non-diabetic controls. All of the patients were healthy and none were taking medication except insulin. The eye examination, which was normal in every patient, included the Ishihara and City University tests, measurement of Snellen acuity, slit-lamp examination, tonometry, and fundal photography as well as fluorescein angiography. Colour discrimination ability was measured with the Farnsworth-Munsell 100-hue test. Mean (SE) 100-hue test error score for the diabetic group was 86.8 (8.1) compared with 28.2 (3.3) for controls, p<<0.001. There was no relation between colour vision abnormalities and diabetes duration (r = 0, p>0.05), blood glucose at the time the colour tests were performed (r = 0.4, p > 0.05), most recent glycated haemoglobin result (r = 0.3, p>0.05), or the mean of all previous glycated haemoglobin results (r = 0, p>0.05). It is concluded that colour discrimination may be abnormal in uncomplicated type 1 diabetic patients before the onset of retinopathy, and that colour discrimination losses in diabetes may not be of vascular aetiology.

A 12-month randomized controlled study of the aldose reductase inhibitor ponalrestat in patients with chronic symptomatic diabetic neuropathy

The effects of the aldose reductase inhibitor ponalrestat (600 mg day-1) on sensory, electrophysiological, and autonomic function were examined in 50 patients with chronic symptomatic, distal symmetrical diabetic neuropathy in a 52-week randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, single-centre study. In an endeavour to identify patients with a degree of neuropathy potentially amenable to pharmacological intervention, a minimum conduction velocity of 30 m s-1 was set for the peroneal motor nerve. At 52 weeks, no significant differences were observed between the ponalrestat and placebo groups in motor (ulnar, median, and peroneal) or sensory (ulnar and radial) nerve conduction velocities, vibration perception thresholds, adjectival symptom scores or tests of autonomic function (mean electrocardiographic R-R interval variability on deep breathing and orthostatic blood pressure response). Ponalrestat was clinically well tolerated and had no significant effect on glycaemic control. The lack of beneficial effects of ponalrestat may in part reflect the advanced stage of the neuropathic process in patients with established symptomatic disease, and the poor reproducibility of current neurophysiological techniques. Firmer knowledge of clinico-pathological correlates allied to improved non-invasive neurophysiological measurement techniques should facilitate the selection of patients for future therapeutic trials in diabetic neuropathy.

The use of gamma-linolenic acid in diabetic neuropathy

EF4 is an entirely new approach to the management of diabetic neuropathy. EF4 (providing gamma-linolenic acid or gamolenic acid, GLA) has been shown to reverse existing diabetic neuropathy in trials in seven centres. Diabetic animals and humans have a reduced ability to convert dietary linoleic acid to GLA. GLA and its metabolites are required for normal neuronal structure and function and a normal microcirculation. The lack of GLA and its metabolites may play a major role in the development of the neuropathy. EF4 helps to correct the biochemical defects, restores levels of GLA metabolites towards normal and produces highly significant clinical and neurophysiological improvements in diabetic neuropathy.