Aggressive lipid lowering does not improve endothelial function in type 2 diabetes: the Diabetes Atorvastatin Lipid Intervention (DALI) Study: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Statin Therapy and Flow-Mediated Dilation: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Meta-Analysis Using the GRADE of Data from Randomized Controlled Trials

INTRODUCTION

A previous meta-analysis reported the positive effects of statin therapy on endothelial function. However, the obtained result had several limitations that necessitated updating the information in this field. Therefore, a systematic and meta-analysis review was conducted to determine whether statin therapy could improve endothelial function, as assessed by flow-- mediated dilation (FMD).

METHODS

MEDLINE, SciVerse Scopus, and Clarivate Analytics Web of Science were searched to identify randomized placebo-controlled trials assessing the impact of statin therapy on FMD. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis to calculate the mean difference in weight. Meta- regression and subgroup analyses were used to identify sources of heterogeneity. In addition, nonlinear dose-response, quality of evidence, influence analysis, and publication bias evaluation were assessed using standard methods.

RESULT

Thirty-five trials (41 arms) involving 2178 participants were included in the meta-analysis study. Statin treatment significantly improved FMD [weighted mean difference (WMD): 1.7%, 95% CI: 1.3-2.2, p < 0.001). However, significant heterogeneity was observed (I2=97.9%, p < 0.001). The results of the subgroup analysis showed that health status can contribute to heterogeneity. Non-linear dose-response analysis revealed the most significant improvement in FMD with atorvastatin at a dose of 20 mg/day and simvastatin at 80 mg/day.

CONCLUSION

Statin therapy significantly improved endothelial function, as assessed by FMD. These changes are clinically significant, but their use should be approached with caution.

Pharmacological effects of statins in adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Due to contradicting findings on impact of statins on endothelial function in type 2 diabetes mellitus especially across the randomized controlled trials (RCTs). With this systematic review, we aim to evaluate whether the use of statins improves endothelial function in adults with type 2 diabetes. We will further highlight if these biomarkers are ideal therapeutic targets for risk for atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease.

METHODS

This protocol was carried out according to the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols-2015 guideline. The online databases, such as MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Sciences, will be targeted using the medical subject heading terms (MeSH) and text words. The review will include clinical studies on the effect of statins on markers of endothelial function in type 2 diabetes. The Cochrane risk of bias guideline will be used to assess the quality and risk of bias. We are planning to use the grading of recommendation assessment, development, and evaluation approach to evaluate the strength and quality of evidence.

RESULTS

This study will not involve human samples and patient data; hence ethics approval will not be required. The findings will be presented in journal clubs and conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Effect of atorvastatin on testosterone levels

BACKGROUND

Statins are one of the most prescribed classes of drugs worldwide. Atorvastatin, the most prescribed statin, is currently used to treat conditions such as hypercholesterolaemia and dyslipidaemia. By reducing the level of cholesterol, which is the precursor of the steroidogenesis pathway, atorvastatin may cause a reduction in levels of testosterone and other androgens. Testosterone and other androgens play important roles in biological functions. A potential reduction in androgen levels, caused by atorvastatin might cause negative effects in most settings. In contrast, in the setting of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), reducing excessive levels of androgens with atorvastatin could be beneficial.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objective To quantify the magnitude of the effect of atorvastatin on total testosterone in both males and females, compared to placebo or no treatment. Secondary objectives To quantify the magnitude of the effects of atorvastatin on free testosterone, sex hormone binding globin (SHBG), androstenedione, dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS) concentrations, free androgen index (FAI), and withdrawal due to adverse effects (WDAEs) in both males and females, compared to placebo or no treatment.

SEARCH METHODS

The Cochrane Hypertension Information Specialist searched the following databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) up to 9 November 2020: the Cochrane Hypertension Specialised Register; the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL); MEDLINE; Embase; ;two international trials registries, and the websites of the US Food and Drug Administration, the European Patent Office and the Pfizer pharmaceutical corporation. These searches had no language restrictions. We also contacted authors of relevant articles regarding further published and unpublished work.

SELECTION CRITERIA

RCTs of daily atorvastatin for at least three weeks, compared with placebo or no treatment, and assessing change in testosterone levels in males or females.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently screened the citations, extracted the data and assessed the risk of bias of the included studies. We used the mean difference (MD) with associated 95% confidence intervals (CI) to report the effect size of continuous outcomes,and the risk ratio (RR) to report effect sizes of the sole dichotomous outcome (WDAEs). We used a fixed-effect meta-analytic model to combine effect estimates across studies, and risk ratio to report effect size of the dichotomous outcomes. We used GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six RCTs involving 265 participants who completed the study and their data was reported. Participants in two of the studies were male with normal lipid profile or mild dyslipidaemia (N = 140); the mean age of participants was 68 years. Participants in four of the studies were female with PCOS (N = 125); the mean age of participants was 32 years. We found no significant difference in testosterone levels in males between atorvastatin and placebo, MD -0.20 nmol/L (95% CI -0.77 to 0.37). In females, atorvastatin may reduce total testosterone by -0.27 nmol/L (95% CI -0.50 to -0.04), FAI by -2.59 nmol/L (95% CI -3.62 to -1.57), androstenedione by -1.37 nmol/L (95% CI -2.26 to -0.49), and DHEAS by -0.63 μmol/l (95% CI -1.12 to -0.15). Furthermore, compared to placebo, atorvastatin increased SHBG concentrations in females by 3.11 nmol/L (95% CI 0.23 to 5.99). We identified no studies in healthy females (i.e. females with normal testosterone levels) or children (under age 18). Importantly, no study reported on free testosterone levels.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found no significant difference between atorvastatin and placebo on the levels of total testosterone in males. In females with PCOS, atorvastatin lowered the total testosterone, FAI, androstenedione, and DHEAS. The certainty of evidence ranged from low to very low for both comparisons. More RCTs studying the effect of atorvastatin on testosterone are needed.

Low Levels of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Endothelial Function in Subjects without Lipid-Lowering Therapy

An elevation of serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels has been associated with endothelial dysfunction in statin naïve subjects. However, there is no information on endothelial function in subjects with extremely low levels of LDL-C. The purpose of the present study was to determine the relationship of LDL-C levels, especially low levels of LDL-C, with endothelial function. Endothelial function assessed by flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) measurement and LDL-C levels were evaluated in 7120 subjects without lipid-lowering therapy. We divided the subjects into five groups by LDL-C levels: <70 mg/dL, 70-99 mg/dL, 100-119 md/dL, 120-139 mg/dL, and ≥140 mg/dL. FMD values were significantly smaller in subjects with LDL-C levels of ≥140 mg/dL than in those with LDL-C levels of 70-99 mg/dL and 100-119 mg/dL (p < 0.001 and p = 0.004, respectively). The FMD values in the LDL-C of <70 mg/dL group were not significantly different from those in the other groups. To evaluate the relationship of extremely low LDL-C levels with endothelial function, we divided the subjects with LDL-C of <70 mg/dL into those with LDL-C levels of <50 mg/dL and 50-69 mg/dL. FMD values were similar in the LDL-C <50 mg/dL group and ≥50 mg/dL group in the propensity score-matched population (p = 0.570). A significant benefit was not found in subjects with low LDL-C levels from the aspect of endothelial function.

The Influence of Statins on the Aerobic Metabolism of Endothelial Cells

Endothelial mitochondrial dysfunction is considered to be the main cause of cardiovascular disease. The aim of this research was to elucidate the effects of cholesterol-lowering statins on the aerobic metabolism of endothelial cells at the cellular and mitochondrial levels. In human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EA.hy926), six days of exposure to 100 nM atorvastatin (ATOR) induced a general decrease in mitochondrial respiration. No changes in mitochondrial biogenesis, cell viability, or ATP levels were observed, whereas a decrease in Coenzyme Q10 (Q10) content was accompanied by an increase in intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) production, although mitochondrial ROS production remained unchanged. The changes caused by 100 nM pravastatin were smaller than those caused by ATOR. The ATOR-induced changes at the respiratory chain level promoted increased mitochondrial ROS production. In addition to the reduced level of mitochondrial Q10, the activity of Complex III was decreased, and the amount of Complex III in a supercomplex with Complex IV was diminished. These changes may cause the observed decrease in mitochondrial membrane potential and an increase in Q10 reduction level as a consequence, leading to elevated mitochondrial ROS formation. The above observations highlight the role of endothelial mitochondria in response to potential metabolic adaptations related to the chronic exposure of endothelial cells to statins.

Effects of combined statin and ACE inhibitor therapy on endothelial function and blood pressure in essential hypertension - a randomised double-blind, placebo controlled crossover study

Background:

The aim of this study was to compare the influence of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase inhibitors on endothelial function and blood pressure in patients with essential hypertension on long-term angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor therapy.

Method:

The study was designed as a prospective, double-blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover clinical trial. Twenty patients with essential hypertension were treated with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor; the control group included 10 healthy subjects. Hypertensive patients received in random order 80 mg of fluvastatin daily or placebo for 6 weeks. The following parameters were assessed at baseline and after each treatment period: serum lipids, flow-mediated vasodilation, activity of von Willebrand factor, concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor, C-reactive protein and 24-hour blood pressure profile.

Results:

Hypertensive patients did not differ from healthy subjects with respect to age, body mass and biochemical parameters, with the exception of C-reactive protein, which was higher in hypertensive patients (P=0.02). After statin therapy, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (P<0.0001), C-reactive protein (P=0.03), von Willebrand factor (P=0.03) and vascular endothelial growth factor (P<0.01) decreased and flow-mediated vasodilation improved (P<0.001). Statins had no significant effect on blood pressure.

Conclusions:

Statins added to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors may improve endothelial function and ameliorate inflammation independently of blood pressure.

Atorvastatin affects negatively respiratory function of isolated endothelial mitochondria

The purpose of this research was to elucidate the direct effects of two popular blood cholesterol-lowering drugs used to treat cardiovascular diseases, atorvastatin and pravastatin, on respiratory function, membrane potential, and reactive oxygen species formation in mitochondria isolated from human umbilical vein endothelial cells (EA.hy926 cell line). Hydrophilic pravastatin did not significantly affect endothelial mitochondria function. In contrast, hydrophobic calcium-containing atorvastatin induced a loss of outer mitochondrial membrane integrity, an increase in hydrogen peroxide formation, and reductions in maximal (phosphorylating or uncoupled) respiratory rate, membrane potential and oxidative phosphorylation efficiency. The atorvastatin-induced changes indicate an impairment of mitochondrial function at the level of ATP synthesis and at the level of the respiratory chain, likely at complex I and complex III. The atorvastatin action on endothelial mitochondria was highly dependent on calcium ions and led to a disturbance in mitochondrial calcium homeostasis. Uptake of calcium ions included in atorvastatin molecule induced mitochondrial uncoupling that enhanced the inhibition of the mitochondrial respiratory chain by atorvastatin. Our results indicate that hydrophobic calcium-containing atorvastatin, widely used as anti-atherosclerotic agent, has a direct negative action on isolated endothelial mitochondria.

Rationale and design of a multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized trial to evaluate the effect of empagliflozin on endothelial function: the EMBLEM trial

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterized by systemic metabolic abnormalities and the development of micro- and macrovascular complications, resulting in a shortened life expectancy. A recent cardiovascular (CV) safety trial, the EMPA-REG OUTCOME trial, showed that empagliflozin, a sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitor, markedly reduced CV death and all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure in patients with T2DM and established CV disease (CVD). SGLT2 inhibitors are known to not only decrease plasma glucose levels, but also favorably modulate a wide range of metabolic and hemodynamic disorders related to CV pathways. Although some experimental studies revealed a beneficial effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on atherosclerosis, there is a paucity of clinical data showing that they can slow the progression of atherosclerosis in patients with T2DM. Therefore, the EMBLEM trial was designed to investigate whether empagliflozin treatment can improve endothelial function, which plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, in patients with T2DM and established CVD.

METHODS

The EMBLEM trial is an ongoing, prospective, multicenter, placebo-controlled double-blind randomized, investigator-initiated clinical trial in Japan. A total of 110 participants with T2DM (HbA1c range 6.0-10.0%) and with established CVD will be randomized (1:1) to receive either empagliflozin 10 mg once daily or a placebo. The primary endpoint of the trial is change in the reactive hyperemia (RH)-peripheral arterial tonometry-derived RH index at 24 weeks from baseline. For comparison of treatment effects between the treatment groups, the baseline-adjusted means and their 95% confidence intervals will be estimated by analysis of covariance adjusted for the following allocation factors: HbA1c (<7.0 or ≥7.0%), age (<65 or ≥65 years), systolic blood pressure (<140 or ≥140 mmHg), and current smoking status (nonsmoker or smoker). Key secondary endpoints include the change from baseline for other vascular-related markers such as arterial stiffness, sympathetic nervous activity, and parameters of cardiac and renal function. Importantly, serious adverse effects independently on the causal relationship to the trial drugs and protocol will be also evaluated throughout the trial period.

DISCUSSION

EMBLEM is the first trial to assess the effect of empagliflozin on endothelial function in patients with T2DM and established CVD. Additionally, mechanisms associating empagliflozin-mediated actions with endothelial function and other CV markers will be evaluated. Thus, the trial is designed to elucidate potential mechanisms by which empagliflozin protects CV systems and improves CV outcomes. Trial registration Unique Trial Number, UMIN000024502 ( https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000028197 ).

Review: Vascular protective effects of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor agonists

ardiovascular disease is significantly increased in patients with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. A clustering of risk factors, including dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance, hypertension, inflammation and coagulation disorders are acting in concert to promote cardiovascular events in these patients. Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPARs) are transcription factors that influence vascular function by altering gene expression in vascular tissue and indirectly via effects on other tissues. Indeed, PPAR activation displays beneficial effects on glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism, and also on endothelial function and vessel wall inflammation. Clinically used PPARα agonists, such as fibrates, and PPARγ agonists, such as insulin-sensitising thiazolidinediones, may consequently alter the process of atherosclerosis, especially in subjects with the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. The present review highlights emerging evidence for beneficial effects of PPAR α and PPARγ in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerosis in such high-risk patients.

Effects of Atorvastatin Dose and Concomitant Use of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors on Renal Function Changes over Time in Patients with Stable Coronary Artery Disease: A Prospective Observational Study

Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) and statins are widely used in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Our aim was to compare changes in glomerular filtration rate (GFR) over time in subjects with stable CAD according to atorvastatin dose and concomitant use of ACEI. We studied 78 men with stable CAD referred for an elective coronary angiography who attained the then-current guideline-recommended target level of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) cholesterol below 2.5 mmol/L in a routine fasting lipid panel on admission and were receiving atorvastatin at a daily dose of 10-40 mg for ≥3 months preceding the index hospitalization. Due to an observational study design, atorvastatin dosage was not intentionally modified for other reasons. GFR was estimated during index hospitalization and at about one year after discharge from our center. Irrespective of ACEI use, a prevention of kidney function loss was observed only in those treated with the highest atorvastatin dose. In 38 subjects on ACEI, both of the higher atorvastatin doses were associated with increasing beneficial effects on GFR changes (mean ± SEM: -4.2 ± 2.4, 1.1 ± 1.6, 5.2 ± 2.4 mL/min per 1.73 m² for the 10-mg, 20-mg and 40-mg atorvastatin group, respectively, p = 0.02 by ANOVA; Spearman's rho = 0.50, p = 0.001 for trend). In sharp contrast, in 40 patients without ACEI, no significant trend effect was observed across increasing atorvastatin dosage (respective GFR changes: -1.3 ± 1.0, -4.7 ± 2.1, 4.8 ± 3.6 mL/min per 1.73 m², p = 0.02 by ANOVA; rho = 0.08, p = 0.6 for trend). The results were substantially unchanged after adjustment for baseline GFR or time-dependent variations of LDL cholesterol. Thus, concomitant ACEI use appears to facilitate the ability of increasing atorvastatin doses to beneficially modulate time-dependent changes in GFR in men with stable CAD.

Renin-Angiotensin System Blockade Associated with Statin Improves Endothelial Function in Diabetics

Background

Studies suggest that statins have pleiotropic effects, such as reduction in blood pressure, and improvement in endothelial function and vascular stiffness.

Objective

To analyze if prior statin use influences the effect of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors on blood pressure, endothelial function, and vascular stiffness.

Methods

Patients with diabetes and hypertension with office systolic blood pressure ≥ 130 mmHg and/or diastolic blood pressure ≥ 80 mmHg had their antihypertensive medications replaced by amlodipine during 6 weeks. They were then randomized to either benazepril or losartan for 12 additional weeks while continuing on amlodipine. Blood pressure (assessed with ambulatory blood pressure monitoring), endothelial function (brachial artery flow-mediated dilation), and vascular stiffness (pulse wave velocity) were evaluated before and after the combined treatment. In this study, a post hoc analysis was performed to compare patients who were or were not on statins (SU and NSU groups, respectively).

Results

The SU group presented a greater reduction in the 24-hour systolic blood pressure (from 134 to 122 mmHg, p = 0.007), and in the brachial artery flow-mediated dilation (from 6.5 to 10.9%, p = 0.003) when compared with the NSU group (from 137 to 128 mmHg, p = 0.362, and from 7.5 to 8.3%, p = 0.820). There was no statistically significant difference in pulse wave velocity (SU group: from 9.95 to 9.90 m/s, p = 0.650; NSU group: from 10.65 to 11.05 m/s, p = 0.586).

Conclusion

Combined use of statins, amlodipine, and renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors improves the antihypertensive response and endothelial function in patients with hypertension and diabetes.

A pilot study of ezetimibe vs. atorvastatin for improving peripheral microvascular endothelial function in stable patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Elevated cholesterol in type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) can cause endothelial dysfunction. An effective clinical therapy to improve endothelial dysfunction remains to be established. Different cardiovascular actions between treatments for the inhibition of cholesterol absorption and the suppression of cholesterol synthesis for achieving improvement in endothelial function are unknown in DM.

METHODS

Stable patients with type 2 DM and mildly elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol were enrolled. We evaluated peripheral microvascular endothelial function using reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry (RH-PAT) examination and calculated a natural logarithmic transformed value for the RH-PAT index (LnRHI). We randomly assigned 33 patients to each monotherapy: cholesterol synthesis suppression using atorvastatin (5 mg/day, n=16) or cholesterol absorption inhibition using ezetimibe (10 mg/day, n=17). Patients were prospectively followed for 6 months. Serum lipids and LnRHI were repeatedly examined before and after each therapy.

RESULTS

LDL significantly decreased in both groups, but the percent changes of LDL showed a greater decrease in the atorvastatin group compared with the ezetimibe group (-34.5±7.8% vs. -21.9±9.6%, p<0.01). Serum levels of non-esterified free fatty acids (NEFA) significantly decreased in the ezetimibe group but not in the atorvastatin group (ezetimibe group: 561.1±236.8 to 429.7±195.9, p<0.01; atorvastatin group: 538.8±319.5 to 520.2±227.3, p=0.75). The percent decrease in NEFA was significantly greater in the ezetimibe group compared with the atorvastatin group (-19.9±27.4% vs. 11.3±44.1%, p<0.05). LnRHI showed a significant increase in the ezetimibe group but not in the atorvastatin group (ezetimibe group: 0.471±0.157 to 0.678±0.187, p<0.01; atorvastatin group: 0.552±0.084 to 0.558±0.202, p=0.64). The percent changes in LnRHI were significantly greater in the ezetimibe group compared with the atorvastatin group (63.3±89.2% vs. 7.4±41.2%, p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with type 2 DM, ezetimibe monotherapy significantly reduced LDL and NEFA, and improved peripheral microvascular endothelial dysfunction. Ezetimibe could potentially exhibit beneficial effects on lipid disorders and microvascular endothelial dysfunction in DM.

Effect of atorvastatin on the angiogenic responsiveness of coronary endothelial cells in normal and streptozotocin (STZ) induced diabetic rats

Atorvastatin, a lipid lowering agent, possesses various pleiotropic vasculoprotective effects, but its role in coronary angiogenesis is still controversial. Our objective was to study the effects of atorvastatin on the angiogenic responsiveness of coronary endothelial cells (cEC) from normal and diabetic rats. Male Wistar rats were distributed among 9 groups; (i) normal rats, (ii) 30 day diabetic rats, (iii) 60 day diabetic rats, (iv) normal rats administered a low dose of atorvastatin (1 mg/kg body mass, per oral (p.o.), for 15 days); (v) 30 day diabetic rats administered a low dose of atorvastatin; (vi) 60 day diabetic rats administered a low dose of atorvastatin; (vii) normal rats administered a high dose of atorvastatin (5 mg/kg, p.o., for 15 days); (viii) 30 day diabetic rats administered a high dose of atorvastatin; (ix) 60 day diabetic rats administered a high dose of atorvastatin. Each group was further divided into 2 subgroups, (i) sham ischemia-reperfusion and (ii) rats hearts that underwent ischemia-reperfusion. Angiogenic responsiveness the and nitric oxide (NO) releasing properties of the subgroups of cECs were studied using a chorioallantoic membrane assay and the Griess method, respectively. Atorvastatin treatment significantly increased VEGF-induced angiogenic responsiveness and the NO-releasing properties of cECs from all of the subgroups, compared with their respective non-treated subgroups except for the late-phase diabetic rat hearts that underwent ischemia-reperfusion, and the high dose of atorvastatin treatment groups. These effects of atorvastatin were significantly inhibited by pretreatment of cECs with l-NAME, wortmannin, and chelerythrine. Thus, treatment with a low dose of atorvastatin improves the angiogenic responsiveness of the cECs from normal and diabetic rats, in the presence of VEGF, via activation of eNOS-NO release.

Effects of orlistat plus diet on postprandial lipemia and brachial artery reactivity in normolipidemic, obese women with normal glucose tolerance: A prospective, randomized, controlled Study

BACKGROUND

Postprandial lipemia (PPL) is an independent predictor of earlyatherosclerosis and coronary artery disease. It is defined as a postprandial triglyceride (TG) level ≥80% higher than the fasting level. Brachial arterial reactivity (BAR) is used to identify early-phase atherosclerosis. Data concerning whether orlistat improves PPL and endothelial function are lacking.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the effects of orlistat on PPL and BAR in normolipidemic, obese women with normal glucose tolerance.

METHODS

This prospective, randomized, controlled study was conducted at Baskent University, Ankara, Turkey. Normolipidemic, obese women aged 18 to 65 years with normal glucose tolerance were eligible for screening. On screening, demographic information, anthropomorphic parameters (body mass index [BMI], waist circumference [WC], hip circumference, waist-hip ratio), BAR, laboratory test results (level of insulin resistance assessed using the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance [HOMA-IR] index, serum lipid profile, fasting plasma levels of glucose and insulin [FPI]), and oral fat-loading test results were recorded as baseline values. The primary end points were the effects of orlistat + diet on PPL (assessed using the AUC of TG) and BAR. Women found on screening to be PPL positive were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to treatment with orlistat 120 mg TID plus low-calorie diet (600-kcal/d deficit; minimum, 1200 kcal/d) or low-calorie diet only (control) for 12 weeks. After 12 weeks, all of the above assessments were repeated, and AUC values for lipid parameters were calculated as secondary outcome measures. To assess tolerability and compliance, women were monitored by telephone each week and instructed to return every 4 weeks for clinic visits.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven women were identified as PPL positive and assigned to the orlistat + diet group (18 subjects) or the control group (9) (mean [SD] age, 45.9 [2.3] years; mean [SD] weight, 87.4 [2.5] kg; mean [SD] BMI, 36.0 [0.8] kg/m(2)). Treatment with orlistat + diet was associated with significantly greater changes from baseline compared with controls in WC (P= 0.003), fasting and postprandial serum TG levels (P = 0.012 and P < 0.001, respectively), FPI level (P = 0.001), and HOMA-IR index (P < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis found that 12 weeks of treatment with orlistat + diet was associated with a numeric, but statistically non-significant, 4.1-fold change in PPL, which was independent of reductions from baseline in weight and WC. Neither treatment was associated with significant changes from baseline in BAR. The prevalences of gastrointestinal symptoms previously found to be related to orlistat use were statistically similar between the orlistat + diet and control groups (9 [50.0%] vs 3 [33.3%] subjects).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this small study in normolipidemic, obesewomen with normal glucose tolerance suggest that 12 weeks of treatment with orlistat 120 mg/d plus low-calorie diet was associated with a numeric, but statistically nonsignificant, 4.1-fold change from baseline in PPL, which was independent of reductions from baseline in weight and WC. Treatment with orlistat + diet was associated with significant effects on WC, TG, and level of insulin resistance, but not BAR.

Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes: pathogenesis, significance, and treatment

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) markedly increases the risk of cardiovascular disease. Endothelial dysfunction (ED), an early indicator of diabetic vascular disease, is common in T2D and independently predicts cardiovascular risk. Although the precise pathogenic mechanisms for ED in T2D remain unclear, at inception they probably involve uncoupling of both endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, as well as the activation of vascular nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase. The major contributing factors include dyslipoproteinemia, oxidative stress, and inflammation. Therapeutic interventions are designed to target these pathophysiological factors that underlie ED. Therapeutic interventions, including lifestyle changes, antiglycemic agents and lipid-regulating therapies, aim to correct hyperglycemia and atherogenic dyslipidemia and to improve ED. However, high residual cardiovascular risk is seen in both research and clinical practice settings. Well-designed studies of endothelial function in appropriately selected volunteers afford a good opportunity to test new therapeutic interventions, paving the way for clinical trials and utilization in the care of the diabetic patient. However, based on the results from a recent clinical trial, niacin should not be added to a statin in individuals with low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and very well controlled low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.

The influence of fenofibrate on lipid profile, endothelial dysfunction, and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with typical and mixed dyslipidemia

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes is associated with early development of endothelial dysfunction. Patients present with typical dyslipidemia (predominantly high levels of triglycerides [TG] and low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol [HDL-C]) or mixed hypercholesterolemia (high levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol [LDL-C] and TG with low HDL-C). Normal levels include LDL-C < 100 mg/dL, TG < 135 mg/dL, and HDL-C > 40 mg/dL for men and >50 mg/dL for women.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effects of 8 weeks' administration of fenofibrate on inflammatory markers, metabolic parameters, and endothelial dysfunction.

METHODS

We administered micronized fenofibrate (Laboratories Fourneir S.A Dijon, France) daily for 8 weeks to 40 dyslipidemic, type 2 diabetes patients with equal numbers in each arm of the typical or mixed dyslipidemia groups. Noninvasive endothelial function assessments were performed and serum inflammatory markers obtained before and after treatment.

RESULTS

The typical group demonstrated significantly greater TG reduction and HDL-C increment, ie, 56% vs, 21.3% (P < .005) and 21% vs. 7.6% (P = .001), respectively, compared with the mixed group. There was greater LDL-C reduction within the mixed group compared with the typical group 21.0% vs. 2.2% (P < .05). Endothelial dysfunction was present in both groups at baseline. After treatment, the typical group demonstrated significant improvement in resting brachial diameter (3.9 mm [interquartile range {IQR} 3.3-4.7] to 4.2 mm [IQR 3.4-4.8], P = .001) compared with no change within the mixed group (3.6 mm [IQR 3.1-5.4] to 3.7 mm [IQR 3.1-5.3], P = .26). Flow-mediated diameter improved significantly in both groups. The mixed group had significantly greater levels of hs-CRP at baseline but no changes throughout the study. The mixed group demonstrated an increase in vascular adhesion molecule-1 from 706 ng/mL (IQR 566-1195) to 845 ng/mL (637-1653; P = .01), a reduction of tumor necrosis factor-α from 7.0 pg/mL (IQR 1.0-43.5) to 2.5 pg/mL (IQR 1.5-13.5; P = .04) throughout the study.

CONCLUSIONS

We effectively compared 8 weeks of fenofibrate therapy in type 2 diabetics with contrasting lipid abnormalities. The typical dyslipidemia group showed significantly greater lipid improvements compared with the mixed dyslipidemia group. Both groups had improvements in endothelial functions that were independent of the lipid levels. We concluded that fibrate therapy in type 2 diabetics is beneficial, especially those with typical dyslipidemia and extends beyond its lipid lowering properties.

High-dose statin monotherapy versus low-dose statin/ezetimibe combination on fasting and postprandial lipids and endothelial function in obese patients with the metabolic syndrome: The PANACEA study

BACKGROUND

Low-dose statin therapy in combination with ezetimibe, an inhibitor of intestinal cholesterol absorption, lowers plasma LDL-cholesterol levels to a similar degree as high-dose statin monotherapy. This study assessed whether similar LDL-cholesterol lowering with simvastatin/ezetimibe combination therapy improves fasting and postprandial arterial endothelial function compared to high-dose statin therapy alone.

METHODS

Multicenter, double-blind, crossover trial in 100 abdominally obese patients with the metabolic syndrome, randomized to 6 weeks' treatment with simvastatin 80 mg or simvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg. Flow mediated dilatation (FMD) and peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT) as well as plasma lipids were measured in the fasting state and after an oral lipid load at baseline and after both treatments.

RESULTS

Fasting LDL-cholesterol levels (3.57 mmol/L at baseline) were reduced to 1.79 mmol/L following treatment with simvastatin 80 mg and 1.81 mmol/L with simvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg, respectively. Plasma lipids were similar at 4 h after an oral lipid load following both treatments for 6 weeks. Fasting endothelial function was also similar with both treatments when assessed by FMD (adjusted mean ± SE: 4.35 ± 0.19 vs. 4.43 ± 0.18; P = 0.777) and EndoPAT (2.12 ± 0.05 vs 2.20 ± 0.05; P = 0.304). After an oral fat load, changes in endothelial function were also comparable for both treatments as assessed by FMD (-0.34 ± 0.21 vs. -0.43 ± 0.20; P = 0.766) and EndoPAT (0.00 ± 0.07 vs. -0.04 ± 0.08; P = 0.712).

CONCLUSION

Treatment with simvastatin/ezetimibe 10/10 mg induced no difference in endothelial function in the fasting and postprandial state compared to simvastatin 80 mg while attaining similar LDL-c levels in obese patients with metabolic syndrome.

Anti-inflammatory effect of atorvastatin on vascular reactivity and insulin resistance in fructose fed rats

We investigated the possible protective effect of atorvastatin against vascular dysfunction associated with insulin resistance (IR) in fructose-fed model rats. The effect of atorvastatin (10 mg/kg/day for 8 weeks) on vascular reactivity, glucose, cholesterol, insulin, and the IR index in a well-established model of dietary hypertriglyceridemia, the fructose-fed rat, was investigated. Fructose feeding (10% fructose in drinking water for 8 weeks) induced hypercholesterolemia and hyperinsulinemia without any change in blood glucose levels. Fructose feeding also elevated serum tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), the insulin resistance index, leukocyte infiltration, and endothelial cell pyknosis. Fructose feeding induced hyper-responsiveness to both phenylephrine (PE), KCl, and hyporesponsiveness to acetylcholine (Ach) but not to sodium nitroprusside-induced relaxation. Atorvastatin, given concurrently with fructose, reduced hypercholesterolemia, hyperinsulinemia, TNF-α level, and the IR index. It also reduced leukocyte infiltration and endothelial cell pyknosis and decreased hyper-responsiveness to both PE and KCl but did not affect hyporesponsiveness to Ach relaxation. In conclusion, atorvastatin protected against impairment in aortic vascular reactivity associated with insulin resistance, particularly increased contractility, but not reduced endothelium-dependent relaxation, by a mechanism involving a reduction in cholesterol and IR in addition to anti-inflammatory effects.

Endothelial function as a functional expression of cardiovascular risk factors

Traditional cardiovascular risk (CV) factors based on the Framingham study have been used to estimate the risk of CV events and determine target cholesterol levels for primary prevention. Recently published systematic reviews have, however, demonstrated that the Framingham risk score is limited in certain cohorts and requires adjustment. Indeed, traditional CV risk factors fail to predict the development of coronary heart disease in 25-50% of cases. This underscores the complex interplay between traditional CV risk factors, genetic predisposition and other atheroprotective factors present in individuals of different populations in predicting CV events. Endothelial dysfunction, a functional expression of the inherent atherosclerotic risk representing an integrated index of both the overall CV risk-factor burden and the sum of all vasculoprotective factors in an individual, may serve as the missing link between CV risk factors and atherosclerotic disease. Endothelial function measurements may aid in future prediction of CV events and help identify high-risk patients for targeted therapy as well as provide a primary therapeutic end point for clinical follow-up of these patients. Recently introduced reactive hyperemia peripheral arterial tonometry is emerging as a promising tool in endothelial function measurement and CV risk stratification.

Low-dose statin therapy improves endothelial function in type 2 diabetic patients with normal serum total cholesterol: a randomized placebo-controlled study

The authors sought to explore the effect of low-dose atorvastatin on endothelial function in normocholesterolemic patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without evidence of coronary disease. Sixty patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, normal serum cholesterol, and normal exercise test results were enrolled. Initial assessment was performed by measurement of the brachial artery diameter and flow velocity both at baseline and after induced hyperemia. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either atorvastatin 10 mg daily for 4 weeks (atorvastatin group=30 patients) or matched placebo for the same period (placebo group=30 patients). Follow-up assessment of the brachial artery diameter and flow velocity (both baseline and hyperemic) was performed after 4 weeks. Initially, no significant difference was found between the two groups regarding brachial artery diameter or flow velocity, both at baseline and at peak hyperemia (P>.05 for all). At follow-up, there was a significantly higher flow velocity at baseline (P<.05) and a significantly higher percent increase of brachial artery diameter (from baseline to peak hyperemia) in the atorvastatin group (P<.05). In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and normal serum cholesterol without evidence of coronary disease, low-dose atorvastatin improves endothelial function.

Reviewing statin therapy in diabetes--towards the best practise

Statin therapy is considered critical both in primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease in diabetes. Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaborators meta-analysis of 14 randomised trials of statins in 18686 people with diabetes provides the latest and largest evidence showing a significant 21% reduction in major vascular events per mmol/l reduction in LDL cholesterol. Importantly, the risk reduction was similar in both types of diabetes. Growing evidence supports the view that statin therapy reduces microvascular complications as well. This review updates the current knowledge of statin therapy in preventing micro- and macrovascular complications in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Fenofibrate improves endothelial function in the brachial artery and forearm resistance arterioles of statin-treated Type 2 diabetic patients

Dyslipidaemia contributes to endothelial dysfunction and CVD (cardiovascular disease) in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. While statin therapy reduces CVD in these patients, residual risk remains high. Fenofibrate corrects atherogenic dyslipidaemia, but it is unclear whether adding fenofibrate to statin therapy lowers CVD risk. We investigated whether fenofibrate improves endothelial dysfunction in statin-treated Type 2 diabetic patients. In a cross-over study, 15 statin-treated Type 2 diabetic patients, with LDL (low-density lipoprotein)-cholesterol <2.6 mmol/l and endothelial dysfunction [brachial artery FMD (flow-mediated dilatation) <6.0%] were randomized, double-blind, to fenofibrate 145 mg/day or matching placebo for 12 weeks, with 4 weeks washout between treatment periods. Brachial artery FMD and endothelium-independent NMD (nitrate-mediated dilatation) were measured by ultrasonography at the start and end of each treatment period. PIFBF (post-ischaemic forearm blood flow), a measure of microcirculatory endothelial function, and serum lipids, lipoproteins and apo (apolipoprotein) concentrations were also measured. Compared with placebo, fenofibrate increased FMD (mean absolute 2.1+/-0.6 compared with -0.3+/-0.6%, P=0.04), but did not alter NMD (P=0.75). Fenofibrate also increased maximal PIFBF {median 3.5 [IQR (interquartile range) 5.8] compared with 0.3 (2.1) ml/100 ml/min, P=0.001} and flow debt repayment [median 1.0 (IQR 3.5) compared with -1.5 (3.0) ml/100 ml, P=0.01]. Fenofibrate lowered serum cholesterol, triacylgycerols (triglycerides), LDL-cholesterol, apoB-100 and apoC-III (P < or = 0.03), but did not alter HDL (high-density lipoprotein)-cholesterol or apoA-I. Improvement in FMD was inversely associated with on-treatment LDL-cholesterol (r=-0.61, P=0.02) and apoB-100 (r=-0.54, P=0.04) concentrations. Fenofibrate improves endothelial dysfunction in statin-treated Type 2 diabetic patients. This may relate partly to enhanced reduction in LDL-cholesterol and apoB-100 concentrations.

Current pharmacotherapeutic concepts for the treatment of cardiovascular disease in diabetics

With the growing worldwide obesity epidemic, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension leading to premature cardiovascular events, are increasingly prevalent. Diabetes mellitus is a significant public health concern and more aggressive management of the condition and its complications, particularly cardiovascular disease, is warranted. Endothelial cell dysfunction is now known to be present at the earliest stages of metabolic syndrome, and insulin resistance and may precede the clinical diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus by several years. The current focus on endothelial cell function as a potential target of pharmacotherapy in the management of cardiovascular disease in diabetics seems warranted, though not all drugs currently prescribed target endothelial cell function equally. In this review, we consider the six classes of drugs currently prescribed for the treatment of hypertension as they impact endothelial cell function and advocate for the development of novel drugs that can repair the endothelium and enhance nitric oxide availability thus preventing future cardiovascular events.

Diabetic foot ulcer burden may be modified by high-dose atorvastatin: A 6-month randomized controlled pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are common complications of diabetes mellitus (DM), with a complex pathogenesis. Treatment is difficult and no single treatment with measurable clinical impact is available. In the present clinical pilot trial, we investigated whether statins could be of use against some of the pathogenic factors in DFUs.

METHODS

Thirteen diabetic patients (10 men; 11 with Type 2 DM; mean age 64 years; mean duration of DM 18 years) with neuropathic DFUs <4 months were randomized to treatment with either 10 mg (six patients; six ulcers) or 80 mg (seven patients; nine ulcers) atorvastatin for 6 months in addition to conventional DFU care (i.e. prompt debridement, DFU pressure relief, and management of any underlying infection).

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in background factors (i.e. HbA1c 8.9%, micro- and macrovascular complications, concomitant medications) or DFU characteristics (duration, surface area, grading) between the two groups. All ulcers in the group receiving 10 mg atorvastatin healed, compared with six of nine ulcers in the group receiving 80 mg atorvastatin (NS). However, two previously healed DFUs recurred and six new DFUs developed in the low-dose group compared with none and one, respectively, in the high-dose group (P = 0.048). There was a significant decrease in C-reactive protein (-1.5 mg/L; P = 0.044) and a non-significant trend towards beneficial effects on lipids and the ankle-arm blood pressure index in the high-dose compared with the low-dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

  We observed a possible beneficial effect of 6-months high-dose atorvastatin on DFUs, which should be tested in appropriately sized prospective studies.

Novel approaches to improving endothelium-dependent nitric oxide-mediated vasodilatation

Endothelial dysfunction, which is defined by decreased endothelium-dependent vasodilatation, is associated with an increased number of cardiovascular events. Nitric oxide (NO) bioavailability is reduced by altered endothelial signal transduction or increased formation of radical oxygen species reacting with NO. Endothelial dysfunction is therapeutically reversible and physical exercise, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor antagonists improve flow-evoked endothelium-dependent vasodilation in patients with hypertension and diabetes. We have investigated three different approaches, with the aim of correcting endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease. Thus, (1) we evaluated the effect of a cell permeable superoxide dismutase mimetic, tempol, on endothelial dysfunction in small arteries exposed to high pressure, (2) investigated the endothelial signal transduction pathways involved in vasorelaxation and NO release induced by an olive oil component, oleanolic acid, and (3) investigated the role of calcium-activated K channels in the release of NO induced by receptor activation. Tempol increases endothelium-dependent vasodilatation in arteries from hypertensive animals most likely through the lowering of radical oxygen species, but other mechanisms also appear to contribute to the effect. While oleanolic acid leads to the release of NO by calcium-independent phosphorylation of endothelial NO synthase, endothelial calcium-activated K channels and an influx of calcium play an important role in G-protein coupled receptor-evoked release of NO. Thus, all three approaches increase bioavailability of NO in the vascular wall, but it remains to be addressed whether these actions have any direct benefit at a clinical level.

Placebo-Controlled Trial of High-Dose Atorvastatin in Patients With Severe Cerebral Small Vessel Disease

Background and Purpose— Uncontrolled studies have shown that statins can improve cerebral vasoreactivity (CVR) in patients with mild small vessel disease. We sought to determine whether high-dose atorvastatin increases CVR compared with placebo in patients with severe small vessel disease.

Methods— Ninety-four adults with recent lacunar stroke were randomly allocated in a double-blind manner to 80 mg of atorvastatin daily or matching placebo after stratification for hypertensive and diabetic status. The primary end point was change in CVR after 3 months of treatment. Secondary outcomes were changes in brachial and carotid artery endothelial-dependent vasodilations.

Results— At baseline, all patients had a severely impaired CVR (mean, 12.1%; 95% CI, 9.5–14.7) and carotid (mean, −0.25%; 95% CI, −1.17–0.67) and brachial artery (mean, 2.72%; 95% CI, 1.39–4.05) endothelial function. Despite reductions of 55% in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and of 30% in high-sensitivity C-reactive protein in the active arm compared to placebo, atorvastatin 80 mg per day did not improve CVR or endothelial dysfunction of carotid and brachial arteries.

Conclusion— We found no positive effect of 3-month treatment with atorvastatin on severe cerebral microvasculature endothelial dysfunction in patients with lacunar stroke.

Short-term effect of atorvastatin on endothelial function in healthy offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus

Endothelial function is impaired in healthy subjects at risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). We investigated whether endothelial dysfunction can be normalized by statin therapy in this potentially predisposed population. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) was measured in 56 first-degree relatives (FDRs) (normotensive, normal glucose tolerance) and 20 age-, sex-, and BMI-matched controls with no family history of DM. Other measurements included insulin resistance index using the homeostasis model of insulin resistance (HOMA(IR)), plasma lipids, and markers of inflammation. The FDRs were then randomized and treated with atorvastatin (80 mg) or placebo daily in a 4-week double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The FDRs had significantly impaired FMD (4.4 +/- 8.1% vs. 13.0 +/- 4.2%; P < 0.001), higher HOMA(IR) (1.72 +/- 1.45 vs. 1.25 +/- 0.43; P = 0.002), and elevated levels of plasma markers of inflammation-highly sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) (2.6 +/- 3.8 mg/L vs. 0.7 +/- 1.0 mg/L; P = 0.06), interleukin (IL)-6 (0.07 +/- 0.13 ng/mL vs. 0.03 +/- 0.01 ng/mL; P < 0.001), and soluble intercellular adhesion molecule (sICAM) (267.7 +/- 30.7 ng/mL vs. 238.2 +/- 20.4 ng/mL; P < 0.001). FMD improved in the atorvastatin-treated subjects when compared with the placebo-treated subjects (atorvastatin, from 3.7 +/- 8.5% to 9.8 +/- 7.3%; placebo, from 3.9 +/- 5.6% to 4.7 +/- 4.2%; P = 0.001). There were also reductions in the levels of IL-6 (0.08 +/- 0.02 ng/mL vs. 0.04 +/- 0.01 ng/mL; P < 0.001) and hsCRP (3.0 +/- 3.9 mg/L vs. 1.0 +/- 1.3 mg/L; P = 0.006). Our study suggests that treatment with atorvastatin may improve endothelial function and decrease levels of inflammatory markers in FDRs of type 2 DM patients.

Impact of Statin Therapy on Central Aortic Pressures and Hemodynamics

Background— Statins reduce the risk of cardiovascular events in people with hypertension. This benefit could arise from a beneficial effect of statins on central aortic pressures and hemodynamics. The Conduit Artery Function Evaluation–Lipid-Lowering Arm (CAFE-LLA) study, an Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT) substudy, investigated this hypothesis in a prospective placebo-controlled study of treated patients with hypertension.

Methods and Results— CAFE-LLA recruited 891 patients randomized to atorvastatin 10 mg/d or placebo from 5 centers in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Radial artery applanation tonometry and pulse-wave analysis were used to derive central aortic pressures and hemodynamic indices at repeated visits over 3.5 years of follow-up. Atorvastatin lowered low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by 32.4 mg/dL (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.6 to 36.3) and total cholesterol by 35.1 mg/dL (95% confidence interval, 30.9 to 39.4) relative to placebo. Time-averaged brachial blood pressure was similar in CAFE-LLA patients randomized to atorvastatin or placebo (change in brachial systolic blood pressure, −0.1 mm Hg [95% CI, −1.8 to 1.6], P =0.9; change in brachial pulse pressure, −0.02 mm Hg [95% CI, −1.6 to 1.6], P =0.9). Atorvastatin did not influence central aortic pressures (change in aortic systolic blood pressure, −0.5 mm Hg [95% CI, −2.3 to 1.2], P =0.5; change in aortic pulse pressure, −0.4 mm Hg [95% CI, −1.9 to 1.0], P =0.6) and had no influence on augmentation index (change in augmentation index, −0.4%; 95% CI, −1.7 to 0.8; P =0.5) or heart rate (change in heart rate, 0.25 bpm; 95% CI, −1.3 to 1.8; P =0.7) compared with placebo. The effect of statin or placebo therapy was not modified by the blood pressure–lowering treatment strategy in the factorial design.

Conclusions— Statin therapy sufficient to significantly reduce cardiovascular events in treated hypertensive patients in ASCOT did not influence central aortic blood pressure or hemodynamics in a large representative cohort of ASCOT patients in CAFE-LLA.

Short term effects of atorvastatin on endothelial functions and oxidized LDL levels in patients with type 2 diabetes

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed in order to investigate the short term effects of atorvastatin on endothelial function and oxidized LDL (oxLDL) levels and to evaluate the association of endothelial dysfunction to oxLDL levels and inflammatory markers in type 2 diabetic patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty type 2 diabetic and 11 healthy subjects with LDL levels between 100-160 mg/dl. without a history of cardiovascular event were included in the study. Both groups were matched with respect to age, gender, body mass indices and lipid levels. Flow- mediated dilatation (endothelium dependent, FMD) and nitroglycerine-induced dilatation (endothelium independent, NID) were measured in the brachial artery using high-resolution ultrasound in all participants and carotid artery intima media thickness (IMT) were also evaluated. OxLDL levels, lipid parameters, blood glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c and inflammatory markers including C-reactive protein (CRP), fibrinogen, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were studied. Type 2 diabetic patients received 10 mg. Atorvastatin for 6 weeks and FMD and NID were reevaluated and oxLDL levels and inflammatory markers remeasured.

RESULTS

Basal FMD, NID, IMT and oxLDL levels besides inflammatory markers were not significantly different between patients and controls. No correlation was found between inflammatory markers and FMD and NID. Only IMT correlated with fibrinogen levels obtained before treatment. In non-diabetics, IMT also correlated with oxLDL levels (p: 0.013). FMD and NID significantly improved after atorvastatin therapy ((7.62 +/- 7.6 vs. 12.65 +/- 7.8, p<0.001 and 18.22 +/- 9.57 vs. 21.43 +/- 9.6, p: 0.007, respectively). Atorvastatin significantly reduced oxLDL levels (57.85 +/- 10.33 vs. 44.36 +/- 6.34, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Atorvastatin improves endothelial functions and reduces oxLDL levels in type 2 diabetics with average lipid levels in the short term and may have beneficial effects in the prevention of early atherosclerotic changes.

Endothelial dysfunction: from molecular mechanisms to measurement, clinical implications, and therapeutic opportunities

Endothelial dysfunction has been implicated as a key factor in the development of a wide range of cardiovascular diseases, but its definition and mechanisms vary greatly between different disease processes. This review combines evidence from cell-culture experiments, in vitro and in vivo animal models, and clinical studies to identify the variety of mechanisms involved in endothelial dysfunction in its broadest sense. Several prominent disease states, including hypertension, heart failure, and atherosclerosis, are used to illustrate the different manifestations of endothelial dysfunction and to establish its clinical implications in the context of the range of mechanisms involved in its development. The size of the literature relating to this subject precludes a comprehensive survey; this review aims to cover the key elements of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular disease and to highlight the importance of the process across many different conditions.

The impact of metabolic syndrome and CRP on vascular phenotype in type 2 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

The burden of cardiovascular disease in diabetes mellitus type 2 (DM2) patients is variable. We hypothesize that metabolic syndrome (MS) and low-grade systemic inflammation modify the extent of atherosclerosis in DM2.

METHODS

Vascular phenotype was determined using the following endothelium-related, hemostatic, and sonographic endpoints in 62 DM2 patients with mild dyslipidemia: sVCAM, sE-selectin, von Willebrand factor (VWF), fibrinogen, s-thrombomodulin (sTM), tPA, PAI-1, flow-mediated dilation (FMD), and intima media thickness (IMT). The impact of MS load (number of criteria present), MS components, and CRP on these parameters was assessed.

RESULTS

Serum sVCAM, sTM, and tPA levels significantly increased with increasing MS load. IMT also significantly increased from 0.602+/-0.034 (one MS criterion) to 0.843+/-0.145 (four MS criteria, p=0.007). LogCRP significantly correlated with fibrinogen, PAI-1, and IMT. In a multiple regression (MR) model with age and gender as covariates, MS load predicted sVCAM and sTM; CRP predicted PAI-1 and fibrinogen; MS load and CRP simultaneously predicted tPA and IMT. For each MS criterion present, IMT significantly increased by 0.04 mm. An increase in CRP from 1 to 3 mg/L resulted in a significant increase of 0.04 mm. Patients with four MS criteria and inflammation (CRP >or=3 mg/L) are predicted to have a 0.21 mm thicker IMT than those without. A second stepwise MR analysis based on gender, traditional risk factors, diabetes-related parameters, renal function, individual MS criteria, and LogCRP as explanatory variables showed a significant effect of systolic and diastolic blood pressure, HDL, and LogCRP on IMT(r(2)=0.36, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

MS and low-grade chronic inflammation have an independent impact on vascular phenotype including IMT in DM2.

Endothelial dysfunction in diabetes mellitus

Diabetes mellitus is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, even in the presence of intensive glycemic control. Substantial clinical and experimental evidence suggest that both diabetes and insulin resistance cause a combination of endothelial dysfunctions, which may diminish the anti-atherogenic role of the vascular endothelium. Both insulin resistance and endothelial dysfunction appear to precede the development of overt hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. Therefore, in patients with diabetes or insulin resistance, endothelial dysfunction may be a critical early target for preventing atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease. Microalbuminuria is now considered to be an atherosclerotic risk factor and predicts future cardiovascular disease risk in diabetic patients, in elderly patients, as well as in the general population. It has been implicated as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and premature cardiovascular mortality for patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, as well as for patients with essential hypertension. A complete biochemical understanding of the mechanisms by which hyperglycemia causes vascular functional and structural changes associated with the diabetic milieu still eludes us. In recent years, the numerous biochemical and metabolic pathways postulated to have a causal role in the pathogenesis of diabetic vascular disease have been distilled into several unifying hypotheses. The role of chronic hyperglycemia in the development of diabetic microvascular complications and in neuropathy has been clearly established. However, the biochemical or cellular links between elevated blood glucose levels, and the vascular lesions remain incompletely understood. A number of trials have demonstrated that statins therapy as well as angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors is associated with improvements in endothelial function in diabetes. Although antioxidants provide short-term improvement of endothelial function in humans, all studies of the effectiveness of preventive antioxidant therapy have been disappointing. Control of hyperglycemia thus remains the best way to improve endothelial function and to prevent atherosclerosis and other cardiovascular complications of diabetes. In the present review we provide the up to date details on this subject.

Improvement in endothelium dysfunction in diabetics treated with statins: a randomized comparison of atorvastatin 20 mg versus rosuvastatin 10 mg

AIM

To investigate the effect a 3-month treatment with atorvastatin 20 mg compared with rosuvastatin 10 mg on endothelium dysfunction in subjects with diabetes.

METHODS

A total of 22 consecutive subjects with diabetes who were not receiving statins were enrolled in the study. Endothelium function was assessed before treatment (T0), after 1 month (T1), and after 3 months of treatment (T2) with statins with brachial echo-Doppler test. Patients were randomized to receive atorvastatin 20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg. Blood samples were drawn in the meantime in order to evaluate C-reactive protein (CRP) plasmatic concentrations.

RESULTS

A total of 82% of patients enrolled showed endothelium dysfunction (hyperemic reserve <5%). Treatment with statins significantly improved endothelium function in diabetics. Subjects with endothelium dysfunction decreased from 82% (T0) to 44% (T2): mean hyperemic reserve values increased from 2.64% (T0) to 3.23% (T1) and 4% (T2) in patients treated with rosuvastatin (ANOVA P < 0.01), and from 2.74% (T0) to 2.75% (T1) and 4.40% (T2) in those treated with atorvastatin (ANOVA P < 0.01); differences were significant only comparing T2 with T0. Relative increase in endothelium reserve was 51.51% with rosuvastatin versus 60.58% with atorvastatin (P N.S.). Both statins significantly reduced plasmatic levels of CRP (3.18 +/- 2.43 mg/dL [T0] vs. 1.31 +/- 1.67 mg/dL [T2] with rosuvastatin [P < 0.01], 7.53 +/- 7.46 mg/dL [T0] vs. 2.92 +/- 2.06 mg/dL [T2] with atorvastatin [P < 0.01]). Relative reduction of CRP levels was -50.57% with rosuvastatin versus -36.28% with atorvastatin (P N.S.).

CONCLUSION

A 3-month treatment with either atorvastatin 20 mg or rosuvastatin 10 mg is effective in improving endothelium dysfunction in subjects with diabetes.

ACE inhibition and endothelial function: main findings of PERFECT, a sub-study of the EUROPA trial

Background

ACE inhibition results in secondary prevention of coronary artery disease (CAD) through different mechanisms including improvement of endothelial dysfunction. The Perindopril-Function of the Endothelium in Coronary artery disease Trial (PERFECT) evaluated whether long-term administration of perindopril improves endothelial dysfunction.

Methods

PERFECT is a 3-year double blind randomised placebo controlled trial to determine the effect of perindopril 8 mg once daily on brachial artery endothelial function in patients with stable CAD without clinical heart failure. Endothelial function in response to ischaemia was assessed using ultrasound. Primary endpoint was difference in flow-mediated vasodilatation (FMD) assessed at 36 months.

Results

In 20 centers, 333 patients randomly received perindopril or matching placebo. Ischemia-induced FMD was 2.7% (SD 2.6). In the perindopril group FMD went from 2.6% at baseline to 3.3% at 36 months and in the placebo group from 2.8 to 3.0%. Change in FMD after 36 month treatment was 0.55% (95% confidence interval −0.36, 1.47; p = 0.23) higher in perindopril than in placebo group. The rate of change in FMD per 6 months was 0.14% (SE 0.05, p = 0.02) in perindopril and 0.02% (SE 0.05, p = 0.74) in placebo group (0.12% difference in rate of change p = 0.07).

Conclusion

Perindopril resulted in a modest, albeit not statistically significant, improvement in FMD.

Lowering serum urate does not improve endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS/HYPOTHESIS

Endothelial dysfunction contributes to excess cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes. There is strong evidence of an association between high serum uric acid concentrations and endothelial dysfunction, and uric acid has been proposed as an independent cardiovascular risk factor in type 2 diabetes. We hypothesised that lowering of uric acid concentrations might allow restoration of endothelial function in this high-risk group.

METHODS

Intravenous urate oxidase (1.5 mg) was administered to ten patients with type 2 diabetes and ten healthy participants in a two-way, randomised, placebo-controlled, crossover study. Forearm blood flow responses to intra-brachial acetylcholine, sodium nitroprusside and N(G)-monomethyl-L-arginine (L-NMMA) were measured using venous occlusion plethysmography. The augmentation index (AIx) was determined by pulse wave analysis as a measure of large arterial stiffness.

RESULTS

Acetylcholine and L-NMMA evoked lesser responses in patients with type 2 diabetes than in healthy participants. Baseline AIx was higher in patients with type 2 diabetes (mean +/- SD: 13.1 +/- 6.9%) than in healthy participants (2.0 +/- 5.1%; p = 0.006). Urate oxidase lowered serum uric acid concentrations by 64 +/- 11% (p < 0.001), but this had no effect on forearm blood flow responses or AIx in either group.

CONCLUSIONS/INTERPRETATION

Substantial short-term lowering of uric acid did not have a direct vascular effect, suggesting that, on its own, this might not be an effective strategy for restoring endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Endothelial function, arterial stiffness and lipid lowering drugs

The endothelium is a dynamic organ that plays a pivotal role in cardiovascular homeostasis. Alteration in endothelial function precedes the development of atherosclerosis and contributes to its initiation, perpetuation and clinical manifestations. It has been suggested that the assessment of endothelial function could represent a barometer of vascular health that could be used to gauge cardiovascular risk. This review summarises the various methods used to assess endothelium-dependent vasodilatation and their potential prognostic implications. In addition, the techniques used to evaluate arterial stiffness are discussed. The latter is to some extent controlled by the endothelium and has been the subject of considerable research in recent years. This paper also discusses the effects of lipid lowering treatment on both endothelial function and arterial stiffness.

Asymmetric Dimethylarginine Determines the Improvement of Endothelium-Dependent Vasodilation by Simvastatin

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that the level of asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA), an endogenous inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase (eNOS), might determine the endothelial effects of statins.

BACKGROUND

Endothelial NO synthase is up-regulated by statins. However, statins failed to improve endothelial function in some studies. Asymmetric dimethylarginine inhibits eNOS by a mechanism that is reversible by L-arginine.

METHODS

Ninety-eight clinically asymptomatic elderly subjects had their plasma ADMA levels screened. Those in the highest (high ADMA, n = 15) and lowest quartiles of the ADMA distribution (low ADMA, n = 13) were eligible to receive, in a randomized order, simvastatin (40 mg/day), L-arginine (3 g/day), or a combination of both, each for 3 weeks. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation (EDD) was assessed by brachial artery ultrasound.

RESULTS

Simvastatin had no effect on EDD in subjects with high ADMA (6.2 +/- 1.2% vs. 6.1 +/- 0.9%), whereas simvastatin plus L-arginine significantly improved EDD (9.8 +/- 1.5% vs. 5.3 +/- 0.8%; p < 0.01). In subjects with low ADMA, simvastatin improved endothelial function when given alone (9.5 +/- 3.2% vs. 6.1 +/- 3.8%; p < 0.001) or in combination with L-arginine (9.0 +/- 3.1% vs. 6.3 +/- 3.3%; p = 0.001). L-arginine alone improved endothelial function in both groups. Endothelium-independent vasodilation was not affected.

CONCLUSIONS

Simvastatin does not enhance endothelial function in subjects with elevated ADMA, whereas it does so in patients with low ADMA. Combination of simvastatin with oral L-arginine improves endothelial function in subjects with high ADMA, but has no additional effect in subjects with low ADMA. As NO-mediated effects may play a major role in the therapeutic effects of statins, ADMA concentration is an important factor that influences the "pleiotropic" effects of simvastatin.

Therapeutic regulation of endothelial dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Endothelial dysfunction is universal in diabetes, being intimately involved with the development of cardiovascular disease. The pathogenesis of endothelial dysfunction in diabetes is complex. It is initially related to the effects of fatty acids and insulin resistance on 'uncoupling' of both endothelial nitric oxide synthase activity and mitochondrial function. Oxidative stress activates protein kinase C (PKC), polyol, hexosamine and nuclear factor kappa B pathways, thereby aggravating endothelial dysfunction. Improvements in endothelial function in the peripheral circulation in diabetes have been demonstrated with monotherapies, including statins, fibrates, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, metformin and fish oils. These observations are supported by large clinical end point trials. Other studies show benefits with certain antioxidants, L-arginine, folate, PKC-inhibitors, peroxisome proliferator activated receptor (PPAR)-alpha and -gamma agonists and phosphodiesterase (PDE-5) inhibitors. However, the benefits of these agents remain to be shown in clinical end point trials. Combination treatments, for example, statins plus ACE inhibitors and statins plus fibrates, have also been demonstrated to have additive benefits on endothelial function in diabetes, but there are no clinical outcome data to date. Measurement of endothelial dysfunction in cardiovascular research can provide fresh opportunities for exploring the mechanism of benefit of new therapeutic regimens and for planning and designing large clinical trials.

The metabolic syndrome and endothelial dysfunction: common highway to type 2 diabetes and CVD

Due to global lifestyle changes, obesity (the main driver of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease ) is reaching pandemic proportions. The metabolic syndrome, which is regarded as a prediabetic state, is characterized by a concurrence of interrelated cardiovascular risk factors, including abdominal obesity, insulin resistance, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and glucose intolerance. Endothelial dysfunction (ED) is common in the metabolic syndrome and is associated with increased risk for T2D and CVD. This review focuses on the mechanisms linking ED to the metabolic syndrome, T2D, and CVD, and the possible therapies that may improve ED and reduce T2D and CVD risk.