Telehealth for Young Adults With Diabetes: Addressing Social Determinants of Health

Innovations: Using telemedicine to improve care of predominantly non-white youth with suboptimal insulin dependent diabetes control

AIM

Despite advances in diabetes treatments, youth commonly fail to meet glucose targets. Telehealth support may help youth meet diabetes related goals. The objective of the project was to assess whether intensive telehealth support in a group of poorly controlled youth with diabetes would help improve glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels and decrease hospitalization rates over a 12-month time frame.

METHODS

This quality improvement project included youth aged 8-18 with suboptimal insulin dependent diabetes control and Medicaid insurance, who were willing to use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM). Participants received weekly contact (phone or video) with a certified diabetes educator and monthly video visits with a nurse practitioner.

RESULTS

Youth (N = 27, 63 % female, 89 % Non-Hispanic Black), diabetes duration 6.2 ± 4.3 years, had baseline mean HbA1c 12.4 ± 1.8 % (112 mmol/mol); 22 % were on pump therapy (majority were non-automated insulin delivery systems). There was a sustained improvement between baseline HbA1c (mean 12.4 %±1.8) (112 mmol/mol) and 3 months (mean 11.5 %±2.8) (102 mmol/mol) (p = 0.03), 6 months (mean 11.1 %±2.1) (98 mmol/mol) (p = 0.01), 9 months (mean 11.4 %±2.3) (101 mmol/mol) (p = 0.04) and 12 months (mean 10.8 %±2.2) (95 mmol/mol) (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

This intensive telehealth intervention provided interim glycemic improvement in a high-risk patient cohort. Further efforts to increase connection in vulnerable pediatric patient groups could help long-term diabetes management.

Technology and health inequities in diabetes care: How do we widen access to underserved populations and utilize technology to improve outcomes for all?

Digital health technologies are being utilized increasingly in the modern management of diabetes. These include tools such as continuous glucose monitoring systems, connected blood glucose monitoring devices, hybrid closed-loop systems, smart insulin pens, telehealth, and smartphone applications (apps). Although many of these technologies have a solid evidence base, from the perspective of a person living with diabetes, there remain multiple barriers preventing their optimal use, creating a digital divide. In this article, we describe many of the origins of these barriers and offer recommendations on widening access to digital health technologies for underserved populations living with diabetes to improve their health outcomes.

Telehealth Technologies in Diabetes Self-management and Education

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus pandemic of 2019 (COVID-19) forced worldwide recognition and implementation of telehealth as a means of providing continuity of care by varied health care institutions. Diabetes is a global health threat with rates that continue to accelerate, thereby causing an increased need for clinicians to provide diabetes care and education to keep up with demand. Utilizing technology to provide education via phone/smartphone, video/audio, web, text message, mobile apps, or a combination of these methods can help improve patient access and clinical outcomes, cut costs, and close gaps in care.

METHODS

While numerous publications have summarized the various tools and technologies available for capturing remote clinical data and their relevance to diabetes care and self-management, this review focuses on self-educational telehealth tools available for diabetes self-management, their advantages and disadvantages, and factors that need to be considered prior to implementation. Recent relevant studies indexed by PubMed were included.

RESULTS

The widespread use and popularity of phones/smartphones, tablets, computers, and the Internet by patients of all age groups, cultures, socioeconomic and geographic areas allow for increased outreach, flexibility, and engagement with diabetes education, either in combination or as an adjunct to traditional in-person visits. Demonstrated benefits of using health technologies for diabetes self-management education include improved lifestyle habits, reduced hemoglobin A1C levels, decreased health care costs, and better medication adherence. Potential drawbacks include lack of regulation, need for staff training on methodologies used, the requirement for patients to be tech savvy, privacy concerns, lag time with technology updates/glitches, and the need for more long-term research data on efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Telehealth technologies for diabetes self-education improve overall clinical outcomes and have come a long way. With increasing numbers of patients with diabetes, it is expected that more optimal and user-friendly methodologies will be developed to fully engage and help patients communicate with their physicians.

1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2024

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a interprofessional expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at https://professional.diabetes.org/SOC.

A Roadmap to an Equitable Digital Diabetes Ecosystem

OBJECTIVES

Diabetes management presents a substantial burden to individuals living with the condition and their families, health care professionals, and health care systems. Although an increasing number of digital tools are available to assist with tasks such as blood glucose monitoring and insulin dose calculation, multiple persistent barriers continue to prevent their optimal use.

METHODS

As a guide to creating an equitable connected digital diabetes ecosystem, we propose a roadmap with key milestones that need to be achieved along the way.

RESULTS

During the Coronavirus 2019 pandemic, there was an increased use of digital tools to support diabetes care, but at the same time, the pandemic also highlighted problems of inequities in access to and use of these same technologies. Based on these observations, a connected diabetes ecosystem should incorporate and optimize the use of existing treatments and technologies, integrate tasks such as glucose monitoring, data analysis, and insulin dose calculations, and lead to improved and equitable health outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of this ecosystem will require overcoming multiple obstacles, including interoperability and data security concerns. However, an integrated system would optimize existing devices, technologies, and treatments to improve outcomes.

1. Improving Care and Promoting Health in Populations: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2023

The American Diabetes Association (ADA) "Standards of Care in Diabetes" includes the ADA's current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-grading system for ADA's clinical practice recommendations and a full list of Professional Practice Committee members, please refer to Introduction and Methodology. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/SOC.