Secukinumab Exhibits Sustained and Stable Response in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis: Results from the SUPREME Study

Paradoxical reaction to IL-17A inhibitor: a case report and literature review

Objective

A case of pustular psoriasis after treatment with secukinumab in a patient with plaque psoriasis is reported, which is the first case in China. To summarize the clinical characteristics of patients who developed the rare paradoxical reaction and treatment options received IL-17A antagonist therapy, we conducted a further literature review.

Methods

Data were analyzed from a patient with plaque psoriasis who developed pustular psoriasis after treatment with secukinumab. A comprehensive review of relevant domestic and international literature was conducted, focusing on cases that met our inclusion criteria for analysis and synthesis.

Results

Anti IL-17A therapy may lead to type conversion, with reported cases more prevalent in women and varying in onset time, predominantly involving palmoplantar pustulosis.

Conclusion

Given the increasing use of IL-17A antagonists in psoriasis treatment, it is crucial to monitor for rare adverse reactions, including the paradoxical induction of pustular psoriasis.

Real-world retention rates and effectiveness of secukinumab in psoriasis: Results from a multicenter cohort study (RAILWAY)

Psoriasis is a chronic, immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease with a high negative impact on patient's quality of life. Secukinumab, the first interleukin 17A inhibitor, has been used for the systemic treatment of psoriasis, but its long-term, real-world retention rates in Japan have not been fully investigated. In this multicenter, noninterventional, retrospective chart review study, the retention rate of secukinumab and its effectiveness among patients with psoriasis in Japan was evaluated up to 5 years. Data of patients who received secukinumab after December 26, 2014, were collected from medical charts obtained from seven sites, all certified for biologics use by the Japanese Dermatological Association. Patient characteristics, secukinumab retention, factors affecting secukinumab retention, reason for drug discontinuation, and effectiveness data were collected. The primary end point was secukinumab retention rate at week 52. A total of 123 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 27 patients discontinued secukinumab by week 52, yielding a 78.0% (95% confidence interval, 69.6-84.4) retention rate at week 52. For patients whose Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score was available, mean ± standard deviation PASI at baseline and at week 52 were 9.21 ± 7.37 and 1.4 ± 2.6, respectively. During the entire study period, "insufficient response" was the most common reason for discontinuation, and "history of biologics use" was a factor significantly associated with secukinumab discontinuation (hazard ratio, 1.72; p = 0.018). This study demonstrates the real-world retention rate and effectiveness of secukinumab in patients with psoriasis in Japan for up to 5 years and provides clinical insights into psoriasis treatment strategies.

Efficacy and Safety of Secukinumab in Elderly Patients with Moderate to Severe Plaque-Type Psoriasis: Post-Hoc Analysis of the SUPREME Study

Purpose

Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A approved for the treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in adults and children. We compared the efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients aged < 65 years (adult patients) versus patients aged ≥ 65 years (elderly patients) in a post-hoc analysis of the SUPREME study.

Patients and Methods

Patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis received subcutaneous secukinumab 300 mg per week for the first 5 weeks, then 300 mg per month. We compared the following outcomes in patients aged ≥ 65 years vs < 65 years: baseline characteristics; PASI50/75/90/100 response rates (improvements ≥ 50%/75%/90%/100% in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) from baseline); changes in Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI); Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD-A, HAD-D) score changes; treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).

Results

Secukinumab was slightly less effective in elderly patients than in adult patients (response rates at week 16: PASI90, 69.4% vs 80.9%, p = 0.4528; PASI100, 44.4% vs 56.7%, p = 0.8973). Elderly and adult patients showed a similar time course of changes in absolute PASI scores. Patients aged ≥ 65 years had a statistically significantly lower improvement in quality of life (mean DLQI reduction) than patients aged < 65 years at week 16 [-5.4 (±4.3) vs -8.8 (±6.9), p = 0.0065] and at week 24 [-5.3 (±4.4) vs -9.2 (±7.1), p = 0.0038]. Secukinumab treatment resulted in comparable mean reductions in anxiety and depression scores in both cohorts at 24 weeks [HAD-A, -1.3 (±3.3) vs -2.1 (±3.8), p = 0.9004; HAD-D, -1.0 (±3.3) vs -1.5 (±3.1), p = 0.4598]. The frequency of TEAEs in the two cohorts was similar (16.7% vs 14.6%, p = 0.7391).

Conclusion

Secukinumab is a valid option for the management of moderate to severe psoriasis in elderly patients.

Bimekizumab treatment in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a drug safety evaluation

INTRODUCTION

Biological treatments deeply changed the management of moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis. Among the available biological therapies, interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors, secukinumab, ixekizumab, brodalumab, and bimekizumab represent one of the most rapid and effective biologic classes available for psoriasis. Bimekizumab, the latest available IL-17 inhibitor, is a humanized monoclonal immunoglobulin (Ig)G1 antibody that acts by neutralizing both IL-17A and IL-17F, showing a unique mechanism of action differing from ixekizumab and secukinumab (selective IL17A inhibitor), as well as brodalumab (antagonist of IL17 receptor).

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to evaluate the safety profile of bimekizumab in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

EXPERT OPINION

The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab have been reported by several phase II and III clinical trials, even in a longer-term period. Moreover, clinical trials also showed bimekizumab to have significantly higher efficacy compared to other biological classes, including anti-TNF, anti-IL-12/23, and even to another IL-17 inhibitor, secukinumab. Although numerous biologics are currently available for psoriasis, some patients may result resistant to other treatments and/or experience psoriatic flares during or after treatment withdrawal. In this scenario, bimekizumab may represent an additional valuable alternative for patients with moderate-to-severe forms of psoriasis.

Variation of body regional responses to Ustekinumab and Secukinumab in psoriasis patients: A real-world retrospective study and literature review

Psoriasis in different body regions displays varying therapeutic responses to biologics, whereas currently relevant studies remain scarce. We retrospectively reviewed the treatment responses of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, who completed the two-year reimbursed ustekinumab or secukinumab treatment in two medical centers in Southern Taiwan. Demographic profiles and body regional PASI scores (head/neck, trunk, upper and lower limbs) along the treatment course were recorded. The proportions of patients attaining PASI 75, 90, 100 and the extent of body regional PASI score improvements were compared in biologic naïve or experienced patients. A total of 57 and 67 patients receiving ustekinumab and secukinumab injections, respectively, were included. Overall, patients receiving secukinumab showed higher degrees of PASI score improvements along the two-year treatment course. The lower limbs had the highest, and the upper extremities and head/neck had the lowest post-treatment PASI scores regardless of prior biologic use in the groups of ustekinumab and secukinumab. The upper limbs showed the highest, while the lower limbs had the lowest complete remission rate (regional specific PASI 100) in response to ustekinumab (upper limbs 48.7%, lower limbs 25.6%) and secukinumab (upper limbs 77.1%, lower limbs 42.8%) in biologic naïve groups. Our study demonstrated that lower limbs were the most treatment-refractory area in response to ustekinumab and secukinumab injections, while the upper limbs and head/neck region had a better response.

Cytometric analysis of patients with COVID-19: what is changed in the second wave?

Background

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had a 1st wave in Europe from March to May 2020 and a 2nd wave since September 2020. We previously studied 35 hospitalized COVID-19 patients of the 1st wave demonstrating a cytokine storm and the exhaustion of most lymphocyte subpopulations. Herein, we describe the results obtained from COVID-19 patients of the 2nd wave.

Methods

We analyzed interleukin (IL)-6 by human-specific enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and a large set of lymphocyte subpopulations by flow cytometry in 274 COVID-19 patients hospitalized from September 2020 to May 2021.

Results

Patients of 2nd wave compared with those of 1st wave showed lower serum IL-6 levels and a higher number of B and most T lymphocyte subpopulations in advanced stages, in relation with the age and the gender. On the other hand, we observed in 2nd wave patients: (i) a reduction of most lymphocyte subpopulations at mild and moderate stages; (ii) a reduction of natural killer cells and T regulatory cells together with a higher number of activated T helper (TH) 17 lymphocytes in all stages, which were mainly related to steroid and azithromycin therapies before hospitalization.

Conclusions

COVID-19 had a less severe impact in patients of the 2nd wave in advanced stages, while the impact appeared more severe in patients of mild and moderate stages, as compared with 1st wave patients. This finding suggests that in COVID-19 patients with milder expression at diagnosis, steroid and azithromycin therapies appear to worsen the immune response against the virus. Furthermore, the cytometric profile may help to drive targeted therapies by monoclonal antibodies to modulate specific IL/lymphocyte inhibition or activation in COVID-19 patients.