Changes in stroke rehabilitation during the SARS-CoV-2 shutdown in Switzerland

Upper-Limb Functional Recovery in Chronic Stroke Patients after COVID-19-Interrupted Rehabilitation: An Observational Study

Background/Objectives: Upper-limb function of chronic stroke patients declined when outpatient rehabilitation was interrupted and outings restricted, owing to the novel coronavirus infection (COVID-19) pandemic. We investigated whether these patients recovered upper-limb function post-resumption of outpatient rehabilitation. Methods: In this observational study, 43 chronic stroke hemiparesis patients with impaired upper extremity function were scored for limb function via the Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity (FMA-UE) and the Action Research Arm Test (ARAT) after a structured interview, evaluation, and intervention. Scores at 6 and 3 months pre- and 3 months post-rehabilitation interruption were examined retrospectively; scores immediately and at 3 and 6 months post-resumption of care were examined prospectively. The amount of change for each time period and an analysis of covariance were performed with time as a factor, changes in the FMA-UE and the ARAT scores as dependent variables, and statistical significance at 5%. Results: The time of evaluation significantly impacted the total score, as well as part C and part D of FMA-UE and total, pinch, and gross movement of the ARAT. Post-hoc tests showed that the magnitude of change in limb-function scores from immediately to 3 months post-resumption was significantly higher than the change from 3 months pre- to immediately post-interruption for the total score and part D of the FMA-UE, as well as grip and gross movement of the ARAT (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Upper-limb functional decline in chronic stroke patients, caused by the COVID-19 pandemic-related therapy interruption and outing restrictions, was resolved approximately 3 months post-resumption of rehabilitation therapy. Our data can serve as reference standards for planning and evaluating treatment for chronic stroke patients with inactivity-related impaired upper-limb function.

Comparisons of three different modes of digital mirror therapy for post-stroke rehabilitation: Preliminary results of randomized controlled trial

Objective

Technologically adapted mirror therapy shows promising results in improving motor function for stroke survivors. The treatment effects of a newly developed multi-mode stroke rehabilitation system offering multiple training modes in digital mirror therapy remain unknown. This study aimed to examine the effects of unilateral mirror visual feedback (MVF) with unimanual training (UM-UT), unilateral MVF with bimanual training (UM-BT), and bilateral MVF with bimanual training (BM-BT) on clinical outcomes in stroke survivors, compared to classical mirror therapy (CMT).

Methods

Thirty-five participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups receiving fifteen 60-minute training sessions for 3-4 weeks. The Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE), Chedoke Arm and Hand Activity Inventory (CAHAI), Revised Nottingham Sensory Assessment (rNSA), Motor Activity Log (MAL), and EQ-5D-5L were administered at pre- and post-intervention and at 1-month follow-up.

Results

After intervention and follow-up, significant within-group treatment efficacies were found on most primary outcomes of the FMA-UE and CAHAI scores in all four groups. Significant within-group improvements in the secondary outcomes were found on the MAL and EQ-5D-5L index in the UM-BT group, and the rNSA tactile sensation and MAL quality of movement subscales in the BM-BT group. No significant between-group treatment efficacies were found.

Conclusions

UM-UT, UM-BT, BM-BT, and CMT led to similar clinical effects on the FMA-UE and can be considered effective alternative interventions for post-stroke upper-limb motor rehabilitation. UM-BT and BM-BT showed within-group improvements in functional performance in the patients' affected upper limbs in real-life activities.

Gait-Adaptability Training in People With Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

In people with hereditary spastic paraplegia (HSP), reduced gait adaptability is common and disabling. Gait impairments result from lower extremity spasticity, muscle weakness, and impaired proprioception. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of a 5-week gait-adaptability training in people with pure HSP.

METHOD

We conducted a randomized clinical trial with a cross-over design for the control group, and a 15-week follow-up period after training. Thirty-six people with pure HSP were randomized to 5 weeks of (i) gait-adaptability training (10 hours of C-Mill training-a treadmill equipped with augmented reality) or (ii) a waiting-list control period followed by 5 weeks gait-adaptability training. Both groups continued to receive usual care. The primary outcome was the obstacle subtask of the Emory Functional Ambulation Profile. Secondary outcome measures consisted of clinical balance and gait assessments, fall rates, and spatiotemporal gait parameters assessed via 3D motion analysis.

RESULTS

The gait-adaptability training group (n = 18) did not significantly decrease the time required to perform the obstacle subtask compared to the waiting-list control group (n = 18) after adjusting for baseline differences (mean: -0.33 seconds, 95% CI: -1.3, 0.6). Similar, non-significant results were found for most secondary outcomes. After merging both groups (n = 36), the required time to perform the obstacle subtask significantly decreased by 1.3 seconds (95% CI: -2.1, -0.4) directly following 5 weeks of gait-adaptability training, and this effect was retained at the 15-week follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We found insufficient evidence to conclude that 5 weeks of gait-adaptability training leads to greater improvement of gait adaptability in people with pure HSP.

Living with the aftermaths of a stroke in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic; the significance of home and close surroundings

Stay-at-home recommendations to reduce the spread of the COVID-19 virus have had a major impact on people's everyday lives. However, while the evidence indicates that such recommendations have caused distress, anxiety, and fear among the public, little is known about how persons living with complex health conditions, e.g., disability after stroke, have experienced and handled the situation. We interviewed fourteen participants (7 women, 7 men) aged 61–91 years living in ordinary housing during summer 2020 to explore how people who recovered after a stroke experienced their everyday lives in their homes and close surroundings during the COVID-19 pandemic recommendations. Three intertwined themes were constructed from the narrative data and the iterative thematic analysis: (1) Places within and out of reach, (2) Upholding activities–strategies and structures, and (3) Adapting to new circumstances. The findings suggest that places within reach were important to maintain activities and provide structure in daily life. The participants seemed to make use of their previous experiences of adjusting to new circumstances after stroke when adapting to living under the stay-at-home recommendations. In addition, feeling that they now shared the restrictions with all other people in society seemed to ease their situations. Access to nature and spaces in the close surroundings was essential for staying socially connected and receiving support in daily life. The significance of the home and the neighbourhood for health experiences among people who recently have had a stroke should inform rehabilitation interventions both during and after pandemics and environmental planning.