Simulated Wear of Self-Adhesive Resin Cements

In vitro evaluation of a silane containing self-adhesive resin luting agent

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the setting characteristics, wettability and bonding capacity with a lithium disilicate ceramic of a silane containing self-adhesive resin luting agent (Panavia SA Universal-PU).

METHODS

The degree of conversion (DC %) and extent of acid neutralization (SY %) of PU were measured on dual- (DC) and self-cured (SC) specimens after 10, 30 and 60 min storage by ATR-FTIR spectroscopy, whereas the presence of silanols was traced by curve-fitting the 60 min spectra, using the silane-free analog (Panavia SA Plus-PS) as a control. The role of a dedicated adhesive (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick-CU) in assisting the early DC % in PU-SC was investigated on 10 min-stored specimens. The water contact angles on polished and HF acid-etched lithium disilicate surfaces (IPS e.max Press), were assessed before and after silanization by unset PU or a silane primer (Ultradent Silane-SL). Finally, the shear strength of PU-DC specimens bonded to the acid-etched ceramic surfaces was determined before and after SL treatment.

RESULTS

The DC % was higher in DC than SC (PU, PS; all time intervals), in PU-SC than PS-SC (30, 60 min) and in the CU assisted PU-SC group. The SY % was lower in DC than SC (PU, PS) and higher in PS-SC than PU-SC groups. Silanols were found only in unset PU and PU-DC groups. SL treatment provided higher water contact angles on polished and acid-etched ceramic surfaces and higher shear bond strength on acid-etched ceramic surfaces than PU (p < 0.05 for all comparisons).

SIGNIFICANCE

Although the degree of conversion of the silane containing luting agent was improved in the self-curing mode, especially in the adhesive assisted group, it was still inferior to light-curing. Acid-neutralization and presence of silanols were affected by the setting modes. The use of a silane primer enhanced the hydrophobicity and bond strength of the silane containing luting agent with the etched ceramic substrate.

Special Issue on Current Techniques and Materials in Dentistry

In the field of dentistry, the use of regenerative therapy, as well as biocompatible and biomimetic materials, is well-established [...]

Wear of contemporary dental composite resin restorations: a literature review

Composite resins are the most commonly used dental restorative materials after minimally invasive dental procedures, and they offer an aesthetically pleasing appearance. An ideal composite restorative material should have wear properties similar to those of tooth tissues. Wear refers to the damaging, gradual loss or deformation of a material at solid surfaces. Depending on the mechanism of action, wear can be categorized as abrasive, adhesive, fatigue, or corrosive. Currently used composite resins cover a wide range of materials with diverse properties, offering dental clinicians multiple choices for anterior and posterior teeth. In order to improve the mechanical properties and the resistance to wear of composite materials, many types of monomers, silane coupling agents, and reinforcing fillers have been developed. Since resistance to wear is an important factor in determining the clinical success of composite resins, the purpose of this literature review was to define what constitutes wear. The discussion focuses on factors that contribute to the extent of wear as well as to the prevention of wear. Finally, the behavior of various types of existing composite materials such as nanohybrid, flowable, and computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing materials, was investigated, along with the factors that may cause or contribute to their wear.

The effect of curing mode of a high-power LED unit on bond strengths of dualcure resin cements to dentin and CAD/CAM resin blocks

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of curing mode with a high-power LED curing unit (VALO) in terms of microtensile bond strength (μTBS) to dentin and microhardness of two dual-cure resin cements. Panavia V5 (V5) and Rely X Ultimate (RXU) were polymerized using one of three curing modes with VALO or self-cure mode to bond a CAD/CAM resin block to a flat dentin surface. Specimens were sectioned and subjected to μTBS test. Vickers hardness values of V5 and RXU were also measured. Two-way ANOVA indicated curing mode and resin cement affected μTBS. For self-cure mode, V5 had significantly higher μTBS than RXU (p<0.05). Higher irradiance did not always provide higher μTBS of dual-cure resin cement to dentin. One-way ANOVA indicated the curing modes affected microhardness of each cement. As for microhardness of RXU, there were significant differences between selfcure mode and light cure modes (p<0.05).

On the wear behavior and damage mechanism of bonded interface: Ceramic vs resin composite inlays

Advances in adhesive technologies have increased indications for the use of inlays. Decrease in the bonded interface integrity due to wear has been cited as the main cause of its failure. However, this process of interface degradation and the influence of inlay material on damage mechanism appear to be poorly understood. Thus, we aimed to compare the wear behavior and interface damage between ceramic and resin composite inlays bonded to enamel under sliding contact and use the experimental findings to support recommendation of the appropriate inlay material. Bonded interface specimens involving tooth enamel and either ceramic or resin composite inlays were prepared and subjected to reciprocating wear tests up to 5×10⁴ cycles. The wear track profiles and morphologies were characterized after increments of cyclic sliding contact using white light interferometry and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Optical microscopy was used to evaluate sub-surface cracks and their propagation within the samples. A finite element analysis was used to analyze the stress distributions of the bonded interfaces. Composite inlays showed higher wear depth than the ceramic in the early stage (N ≤ 5×10² cycles), while no significant difference was found at the later stage. For ceramic inlay a greater portion of the contact load was concentrated in the ceramic structure, which facilitated cracks and chipping of the ceramic inlay, with rather minimal damage in the adjacent interface and enamel. In contrast, for the resin composite inlay there was larger stress concentrated in the adjacent enamel, which caused the development of cracks and their propagation to the inner enamel. The restoration material could contribute to the stress distribution and extent of damage within enamel-inlay bonded interfaces. A tough ceramic appears to be more effective at protecting the residual dental tissue.

Wear of resin composites: Current insights into underlying mechanisms, evaluation methods and influential factors

The application of resin composites in dentistry has become increasingly widespread due to the increased aesthetic demands of patients, improvements in the formulation of resin composites, and the ability of these materials to bond to tooth structures, together with concerns about dental amalgam fillings. As resistance to wear is an important factor in determining the clinical success of resin composite restoratives, this review article defines what constitutes wear and describes the major underlying phenomena involved in this process. Insights are further included on both in vivo and in vitro tests used to determine the wear resistance of resin composite and the relationships between these tests. The discussion focuses on factors that contribute to the wear of resin composite. Finally, future perspectives are included on both clinical and laboratory tests and on the development of resin composite restorations.