Effect of Er: YAG laser irradiation with additional low energy on resin-dentin bonding and morphology of bonded interface

OBJECTIVES

To examine the micro tensile bond strength (μTBS) and the resin-dentin interface on a laser-irradiated dentin surface using two different irradiation methods, with or without additional low-energy irradiation.

METHODS

The flat bovine dentin surface was divided into three groups: i). control group (C group, no irradiation), ii) 80 mJ/pulse Er: YAG laser group (80 group), iii) 80 + 30 mJ/pulse Er: YAG laser group (80 + 30 group, with an additional 30 mJ/pulse). After the roughness of the dentin surface was recorded, Clearfil SE Bond 2 or Clearfil Universal Bond Quick (Kuraray Noritake Dental Inc., Tokyo, Japan) was applied. After the μTBS testing, the failure mode was observed. The bonded interface was assessed using Rhodamine-dye incorporated adhesives and observed by optical coherence tomography.

RESULTS

The dentin surface showed opened dentinal tubules without a smear layer after irradiation. For both adhesives, the μTBS was significantly higher in 80 + 30 group than in the 80 group (p < 0.05). In the 80 group, the thickness of the adhesive layer was not uniform, and the dentin surface was occasionally in direct contact with the composite resin. The failure mode images showed that most of the fractures in the 80 group were at the sub-surface of irradiated dentin. The adhesive layers of the 80 + 30 groups were homogeneous.

CONCLUSIONS

The dentin surface was rough and irregular by 80 mJ irradiation, which might result in an inadequate resin-dentin interface and the weak μTBS. The bonded integrity was mitigated by additional irradiation.

On the wear behavior and damage mechanism of bonded interface: Ceramic vs resin composite inlays

Advances in adhesive technologies have increased indications for the use of inlays. Decrease in the bonded interface integrity due to wear has been cited as the main cause of its failure. However, this process of interface degradation and the influence of inlay material on damage mechanism appear to be poorly understood. Thus, we aimed to compare the wear behavior and interface damage between ceramic and resin composite inlays bonded to enamel under sliding contact and use the experimental findings to support recommendation of the appropriate inlay material. Bonded interface specimens involving tooth enamel and either ceramic or resin composite inlays were prepared and subjected to reciprocating wear tests up to 5×10⁴ cycles. The wear track profiles and morphologies were characterized after increments of cyclic sliding contact using white light interferometry and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Optical microscopy was used to evaluate sub-surface cracks and their propagation within the samples. A finite element analysis was used to analyze the stress distributions of the bonded interfaces. Composite inlays showed higher wear depth than the ceramic in the early stage (N ≤ 5×10² cycles), while no significant difference was found at the later stage. For ceramic inlay a greater portion of the contact load was concentrated in the ceramic structure, which facilitated cracks and chipping of the ceramic inlay, with rather minimal damage in the adjacent interface and enamel. In contrast, for the resin composite inlay there was larger stress concentrated in the adjacent enamel, which caused the development of cracks and their propagation to the inner enamel. The restoration material could contribute to the stress distribution and extent of damage within enamel-inlay bonded interfaces. A tough ceramic appears to be more effective at protecting the residual dental tissue.

Wear and damage at the bonded interface between tooth enamel and resin composite

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the wear mechanisms and evolution of damage in tooth enamel-resin composite bonded interfaces caused by sliding contact, and to develop an understanding of interface degradation from a tribological viewpoint that supports clinical recommendations for improving interface integrity.

METHODS

Reciprocating wear tests were performed on bonded interface samples involving commercial resin composite (Tetric N Ceram Bulk Fill), resin cement (Rely X U200) and tooth enamel using the ball-on-flat configuration. The bonded samples were subjected up to 5 × 10⁴ cycles of sliding contact, and the wear depth and wear track morphology were characterized after increments using white light interferometry and scanning electron microscopy, respectively. Optical microscopy was also used to evaluate cracks and their propagation in the samples.

RESULTS

In the early stages of sliding contact, wear evolved most rapidly at the interface, followed by the enamel and the resin composite. Gradually, the difference between the wear depth at the interface and other areas decreased. Furthermore, cracks and brittle fracture appeared in the enamel during the early stages of wear, adjacent to the interface. With continuing cyclic loading, enamel wear manifested primarily as ploughs, with discontinuous pits and peeled material. Cracking decreased to only a few cracks extending to the inner enamel and parallel to the interface.

CONCLUSIONS

Cracking and damage occurred in the enamel during the early stages of sliding contact and accelerated by poor margin finishing. Cracks caused by wear under sliding contact could be one of the reasons for secondary caries and tooth discoloration.

Fatigue testing of biomaterials and their interfaces

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this article is to describe the importance of fatigue to the success of restorative dentistry, with emphasis on the methods for evaluating the fatigue properties of materials in this field, and the durability of their bonded interfaces.

METHODS

The stress-life fatigue and fatigue crack growth approaches for evaluating the fatigue resistance of dental biomaterials are introduced. Emphasis is placed on in vitro studies of the hard tissue foundation, restorative materials and their bonded interfaces. The concept of durability is then discussed, including the effects of conventional "mechanical" fatigue combined with pervasive threats of the oral environment, including variations in pH and the activation of endogenous dentin proteases.

RESULTS

There is growing evidence that fatigue is a principal contributor to the failure of restorations and that measures of static strength, used in qualifying new materials and practices, are not reflective of the fatigue performance. Results of selected studies show that the fundamental steps involved in the placement of restorations, including the cutting of preparations and etching, cause a significant reduction to the fatigue strength of the hard tissue foundation. In regards to the bonded interface, results of studies focused on fatigue resistance highlight the importance of the hybridization of resin tags, and that a reduction in integrity of the dentin collagen is detrimental to the durability of dentin bonds.

SIGNIFICANCE

Fatigue should be a central concern in the development of new dental materials and in assessing the success of restorative practices. A greater recognition of contributions from fatigue to restoration failures, and the development of approaches with closer connection to in vivo conditions, will be essential for extending the definition of lifelong oral health.