Stereoscopic 3D Optic Flow Distortions Caused by Mismatches between Image Acquisition and Display Parameters

Design guidelines for limiting and eliminating virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects at work: a comprehensive, factor-oriented review

Virtual reality (VR) can induce side effects known as virtual reality-induced symptoms and effects (VRISE). To address this concern, we identify a literature-based listing of these factors thought to influence VRISE with a focus on office work use. Using those, we recommend guidelines for VRISE amelioration intended for virtual environment creators and users. We identify five VRISE risks, focusing on short-term symptoms with their short-term effects. Three overall factor categories are considered: individual, hardware, and software. Over 90 factors may influence VRISE frequency and severity. We identify guidelines for each factor to help reduce VR side effects. To better reflect our confidence in those guidelines, we graded each with a level of evidence rating. Common factors occasionally influence different forms of VRISE. This can lead to confusion in the literature. General guidelines for using VR at work involve worker adaptation, such as limiting immersion times to between 20 and 30 min. These regimens involve taking regular breaks. Extra care is required for workers with special needs, neurodiversity, and gerontechnological concerns. In addition to following our guidelines, stakeholders should be aware that current head-mounted displays and virtual environments can continue to induce VRISE. While no single existing method fully alleviates VRISE, workers' health and safety must be monitored and safeguarded when VR is used at work.

Effect of spatial distortions in head-mounted displays on visually induced motion sickness

Incomplete optical distortion correction in VR HMDs leads to spatial dynamic distortion, which is a potential cause of VIMS. A perception experiment is designed for the investigation with three spatial distortion levels, with the subjective SSQ, five-scale VIMS level rating, and objective postural instability adopted as the evaluation metrics. The results show that the factor of spatial distortion level has a significant effect on all metrics increments (p<0.05). As the spatial distortion level drops off, the increments of VIMS symptoms decrease. The study highlights the importance of perfect spatial distortion correction in VR HMDs for eliminating the potential VIMS aggravation effect.

Stereoscopic 3D geometric distortions analyzed from the viewer's point of view

Stereoscopic 3D (S3D) geometric distortions can be introduced by mismatches among image capture, display, and viewing configurations. In previous work of S3D geometric models, geometric distortions have been analyzed from a third-person perspective based on the binocular depth cue (i.e., binocular disparity). A third-person perspective is different from what the viewer sees since monocular depth cues (e.g., linear perspective, occlusion, and shadows) from different perspectives are different. However, depth perception in a 3D space involves both monocular and binocular depth cues. Geometric distortions that are solely predicted by the binocular depth cue cannot describe what a viewer really perceives. In this paper, we combine geometric models and retinal disparity models to analyze geometric distortions from the viewer's perspective where both monocular and binocular depth cues are considered. Results show that binocular and monocular depth-cue conflicts in a geometrically distorted S3D space. Moreover, user-initiated head translations averting from the optimal viewing position in conventional S3D displays can also introduce geometric distortions, which are inconsistent with our natural 3D viewing condition. The inconsistency of depth cues in a dynamic scene may be a source of visually induced motions sickness.