Hemadsorption in cardiac surgery: myth against reality

Hemoadsorption: effective in reducing circulating fragments of the endothelial glycocalyx during cardiopulmonary bypass in patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery?

BACKGROUND

The vascular endothelial glycocalyx is susceptible to ischemia and hypoxia. Released soluble components of the endothelial glycocalyx (EG) have been identified as potential damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs) able to enhance an ongoing inflammatory response. Shedding of the EG has been associated with released atrial-natriuretic peptide (ANP) during cardiac surgery procedures. A novel hemoadsorption technique (CytoSorb^®) has been shown to effectively remove molecules up to 55 kDa unspecifically from circulation. It is not known whether ANP or glycocalyx components can be removed successfully by this technique.

METHODS

In 15 patients undergoing on-pump cardiac surgery, the hemoadsorption device was integrated in the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) circuit. Pre- and post-adsorber concentrations of ANP, heparan sulphate (HEP), syndecan-1 (SYN) and hyaluronan (HYA) were measured at 10 (T1), 30 (T2), and 60 (T3) minutes after aortic cross-clamping and complete CPB.

RESULTS

Hemoadsorption significantly reduced mean HEP concentrations (-157.5 [333.4] ng/mL; P<0.001) post adsorber. For ANP and SYN no statistically significant changes were detected whereas mean [SD] HYA concentrations even increased significantly (+21.6 [43.0] ng/mL; P<0.001) post adsorber.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study representing a real-life scenario, we could demonstrate that the novel hemoadsorption device (CytoSorb^®) was able to effectively adsorb HEP from the circulation if integrated in a CPB circuit. However, blood concentrations of HYA, SYN, and ANP could not be reduced during CPB in our investigation.

Experience with hemoadsorption (CytoSorb®) in the management of septic shock patients

BACKGROUND

Cytokines and inflammatory mediators are the hallmarks of sepsis. Extracorporeal cytokine hemoadsorption devices are the newer clinical support system to overcome the cytokine storm during sepsis.

AIM

To retrospectively evaluate the clinical outcomes of patients admitted in intensive care unit with septic shock with different etiologies.

METHODS

The laboratory parameters including biomarkers such as procalcitonin, serum lactate and C-reactive protein; and the hemodynamic parameters; mean arterial pressure, vasopressor doses, sepsis scores, cytokine levels and other vital parameters were evaluated. We evaluated these outcomes among survivors and non-survivors.

RESULTS

Of 100 patients evaluated, 40 patients survived. Post treatment, the vasopressors dosage remarkably decreased though it was not statistically different; 34.15% (P = 0.0816) for epinephrine, 20.5 % for norepinephrine (P = 0.3099) and 51% (P = 0.0678) for vasopressin. In the survivor group, a remarkable reduction of biomarkers levels; procalcitonin (65%, P = 0.5859), C-reactive protein (27%, P = 0.659), serum lactate (27%, P = 0.0159) and bilirubin (43.11%; P = 0.0565) were observed from baseline after CytoSorb^® therapy. A significant reduction in inflammatory markers; interleukin 6 and interleukin 10; (87% and 92%, P < 0.0001) and in tumour necrosis factor (24%, P = 0.0003) was also seen. Overall, 28 (28%) patients who were given CytoSorb^® therapy less than 48 h after onset of septic shock survived and the maximum duration of stay for 70% of these patients in intensive care unit was less than 15 d.

CONCLUSION

CytoSorb^® is a safe and well tolerated rescue therapy option in patients with septic shock. However, early (preferably within < 48 h after onset of septic shock) initiation could result in better clinical outcomes. Further randomized trials are needed to define the potential benefits of this new treatment modality.