Risk factors of recurrence after endovascular embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk factors for recurrence after endovascular embolization of posterior communicating artery aneurysms (PcomA).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 163 patients harboring 172 PocmAs who were treated with endovascular embolization from January 2019 to December 2020. The patients were divided into recurrence and stable groups depending on outcome. Univariate and logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the potential risk factors of recurrence during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the total 163 patients harboring 172 aneurysms, 107 were treated with simple coil occlusion and 65 were treated with stent-assisted coil embolization. There were significant differences in aneurysm sizes and use of non-stent-assisted coil embolizations between the groups (P < 0.05). The incidence of saccular aneurysm and Raymond grade were significantly higher in the recurrent group than in the stable group (P < 0.01). After variable selection, Raymond grade, aneurysm size, saccular aneurysm and non-stent-assisted coil embolization were included in further analysis. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed significant associations with non-stent-assisted coil embolization (P = 0.007), packing density (P < 0.001) and Raymond grades II (P < 0.001) and III (P = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

Non-stent-assisted coil embolization, as well as packing density and Raymond grades II grade III are associated with recurrence after endovascular treatment of PcomA.

Risk factors for recanalization of dense coil packing for unruptured cerebral aneurysms in endovascular coil embolization: Analysis of a single center's experience

In coil embolization of cerebral aneurysms, inadequate packing is known to increase the probability of recanalization. Even tightly embolized aneurysms may be recanalized, but predictive factors for recanalization have not been fully investigated. This retrospective study aimed to identify risk factors for recanalization of treated aneurysms with a volume embolization ratio (VER) ≥ 25%. A total of 301 unruptured aneurysms in 248 patients who underwent coil embolization between March 2012 and January 2021 were analyzed. Cases involving dissecting aneurysm, intraluminal thrombosis, parent artery occlusion, intraoperative rupture, re-treatment, rupture the day after surgery, postoperative coil migration, and postoperative parent artery occlusion were excluded due to the inaccuracy of VER. A total of 105 aneurysms (34.9%) treated with VER ≥ 25% were extracted. Clinical features (age, sex, medical history, family history), anatomical features (shape, location, aneurysm size, inflow angle, and volume), procedural features (stent-assisted, Raymond-Roy occlusion classification [RROC] immediately after treatment, re-treatment rate), and follow-up period were compared between Recanalization and Non-recanalization groups. Predictors of recanalization were determined using logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Eleven aneurysms were recanalized. In multivariate analysis, RROC class 3 (odds ratio [OR] 11.0; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.03-59.4) and aneurysm volume (OR 1.005; 95%CI 1.001-1.008) were independent predictors of recanalization. ROC curve analysis showed optimal cutoff values for aneurysm volume of 69.5 mm³ (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 72.3%). In coil embolization of unruptured aneurysms that VER ≥ 25%, cases with RROC class 3 or high aneurysm volume may be associated with a higher risk of recanalization, and should be carefully followed-up.

Endovascular Coiling Versus Neurosurgical Clipping for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background Aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage is a frequently devastating condition with a reported incidence of between 10 and 15 people per 100,000 in the United States. Currently, according to the best of our knowledge, there are not enough meta-analyses available in the medical literature of the last five years which compare the risks and benefits of endovascular coiling with neurosurgical clipping. Methods Twenty-two studies were selected out of the short-listed studies. The studies were selected on the basis of relevance to the topic, sample size, sampling technique, and randomization. Data were analyzed on Revman software. Results Mortality was found to be significantly higher in the endovascular coiling group (odds ratio (OR): 1.17; confidence interval (CI): 95%, 1.04, 1.32). Re-bleeding was significantly higher in endovascular coiling (OR: 2.87; CI: 95%, 1.67, 4.93). Post-procedure complications were significantly higher in neurosurgical clipping compared to endovascular coiling (OR: 0.36; CI: 95%, 0.24, 0.56). Neurosurgical clipping was a 3.82 times better surgical technique in terms of re-bleeding (Z = 3.82, p = 0.0001). Neurosurgical clipping is a better technique requiring fewer re-treatments compared to endovascular coiling (OR: 4.64; CI: 95%, 2.31, 9.29). Endovascular coiling was found to be a better technique as it requires less rehabilitation compared to neurosurgical clipping (OR: 0.75; CI: 95%, 0.64,0.87). Conclusion Neurosurgical clipping provides better results in terms of mortality, re-bleeding, and re-treatments. Endovascular coiling is a better surgical technique in terms of post-operative complications, favorable outcomes, and rehabilitation.