Precision medicine in the treatment of acromegaly

Predictors of biochemical response to somatostatin receptor ligands in acromegaly

Although predictors of response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRLs), and to a lesser extent to pasireotide, have been studied in acromegaly for many years, their use is still not recommended in clinical guidelines. Is there insufficient evidence to use them? Numerous biomarkers including various clinical, functional, radiological and molecular markers have been identified. The first ones are applicable pre-surgery, while the molecular predictors are utilized for patients not cured after surgery. In this regard, factors predicting a good response to fg-SRLs are specifically: low basal GH, a low GH nadir in the acute octreotide test, T2 MRI hypointensity, a densely granulated pattern, high immunohistochemistry staining for somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2), and E-cadherin. However, there is still a lack of consensus regarding which of these biomarkers is more useful or how to integrate them into clinical practice. With classical statistical methods, it is complex to define reliable and generalizable cut-off values for a single biomarker. The potential solution to the limitations of traditional methods involves combining systems biology with artificial intelligence, which is currently providing answers to such long-standing questions that may eventually be finally included into the clinical guidelines and make personalized medicine a reality. The aim of this review is to describe the current knowledge of the main fg-SRLs and pasireotide response predictors, discuss their current usefulness, and point to future directions in the research of this field.

Integrative clinical, hormonal, and molecular data associate with invasiveness in acromegaly: REMAH study

INTRODUCTION

Growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary tumors (GHomas) are the most common acromegaly cause. At diagnosis, most of them are macroadenomas, and up to 56% display cavernous sinus invasion. Biomarker assessment associated with tumor growth and invasion is important to optimize their management.

OBJECTIVES

The study aims to identify clinical/hormonal/molecular biomarkers associated with tumor size and invasiveness in GHomas and to analyze the influence of pre-treatment with somatostatin analogs (SSAs) or dopamine agonists (DAs) in key molecular biomarker expression.

METHODS

Clinical/analytical/radiological variables were evaluated in 192 patients from the REMAH study (ambispective multicenter post-surgery study of the Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition). The expression of somatostatin/ghrelin/dopamine system components and key pituitary/proliferation markers was evaluated in GHomas after the first surgery. Univariate/multivariate regression studies were performed to identify association between variables.

RESULTS

Eighty percent of patients harbor macroadenomas (63.8% with extrasellar growth). Associations between larger and more invasive GHomas with younger age, visual abnormalities, higher IGF1 levels, extrasellar/suprasellar growth, and/or cavernous sinus invasion were found. Higher GH1 and lower PRL/POMC/CGA/AVPR1B/DRD2T/DRD2L expression levels (P < .05) were associated with tumor invasiveness. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator's penalized regression identified combinations of clinical and molecular features with areas under the curve between 0.67 and 0.82. Pre-operative therapy with DA or SSAs did not alter the expression of any of the markers analyzed except for DRD1/AVPR1B (up-regulated with DA) and FSHB/CRHR1 (down-regulated with SSAs).

CONCLUSIONS

A specific combination of clinical/analytical/molecular variables was found to be associated with tumor invasiveness and growth capacity in GHomas. Pre-treatment with first-line drugs for acromegaly did not significantly modify the expression of the most relevant biomarkers in our association model. These findings provide valuable insights for risk stratification and personalized management of GHomas.

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA).

DESIGN

This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality.

RESULTS

Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline.

CONCLUSION

In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

Predictors of Response to Treatment with First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Patients with Acromegaly

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Predictors of first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fgSRLs) response in acromegaly have been studied for over 30 years, but they are still not recommended in clinical guidelines. Is there not enough evidence to support their use? This systematic review aims to describe the current knowledge of the main predictors of fgSRLs response and discuss their current usefulness, as well as future research directions.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in the Scopus and PubMed databases for functional, imaging, and molecular predictive factors.

RESULTS

A total of 282 articles were detected, of which 64 were included. Most of them are retrospective studies performed between 1990 and 2023 focused on the predictive response to fgSRLs in acromegaly. The usefulness of the predictive factors is confirmed, with good response identified by the most replicated factors, specifically low GH nadir in the acute octreotide test, T2 MRI hypointensity, high Somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) and E-cadherin expression, and a densely granulated pattern. Even if these biomarkers are interrelated, the association is quite heterogeneous. With classical statistical methods, it is complex to define reliable and generalizable cut-off values worth recommending in clinical guidelines. Machine-learning models involving omics are a promising approach to achieve the highest accuracy values to date.

CONCLUSIONS

This survey confirms a sufficiently robust level of evidence to apply knowledge of predictive factors for greater efficiency in the treatment decision process. The irruption of artificial intelligence in this field is providing definitive answers to such long-standing questions that may change clinical guidelines and make personalized medicine a reality.

Revisiting the usefulness of the short acute octreotide test to predict treatment outcomes in acromegaly

Introduction

We previously described that a short version of the acute octreotide test (sAOT) can predict the response to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) in patients with acromegaly. We have prospectively reassessed the sAOT in patients from the ACROFAST study using current ultra-sensitive GH assays. We also studied the correlation of sAOT with tumor expression of E-cadherin and somatostatin receptor 2 (SSTR2) .

Methods

A total of 47 patients treated with SRLs for 6 months were evaluated with the sAOT at diagnosis and correlated with SRLs' response. Those patients whose IGF1 decreased to <3SDS from normal value were considered responders and those whose IGF1 was ≥3SDS, were considered non-responders. The 2 hours GH value (GH2h) after s.c. administration of 100 mcg of octreotide was used to define predictive cutoffs. E-cadherin and SSTR2 immunostaining in somatotropinoma tissue were investigated in 24/47 and 18/47 patients, respectively.

Results

In all, 30 patients were responders and 17 were non-responders. GH2h was 0.68 (0.25-1.98) ng/mL in responders vs 2.35 (1.59-9.37) ng/mL in non-responders (p<0.001). GH2h = 1.4ng/mL showed the highest ability to identify responders (accuracy of 81%, sensitivity of 73.3%, and specificity of 94.1%). GH2h = 4.3ng/mL was the best cutoff for non-response prediction (accuracy of 74%, sensitivity of 35.3%, and specificity of 96.7%). Patients with E-cadherin-positive tumors showed a lower GH2h than those with E-cadherin-negative tumors [0.9 (0.3-2.1) vs 3.3 (1.5-12.1) ng/mL; p<0.01], and patients with positive E-cadherin presented a higher score of SSTR2 (7.5 ± 4.2 vs 3.3 ± 2.1; p=0.01).

Conclusion

The sAOT is a good predictor tool for assessing response to SRLs and correlates with tumor E-cadherin and SSTR2 expression. Thus, it can be useful in clinical practice for therapeutic decision-making in patients with acromegaly.

Innovative therapeutics in acromegaly

Acromegaly is a systemic disease associated with increased morbidity and mortality that can be prevented with adequate disease control. Three modalities of treatment (surgery, medical treatment, and radiotherapy) are available; however, a significant proportion of patients still maintain disease activity despite treatment. Therefore, there is a need for innovations in the treatment of acromegaly that include changes in the current trial and error approach and the development of new drugs. In this review, we summarize the recent innovations in the treatment of acromegaly and address the future perspectives in this field.

Approach of Acromegaly during Pregnancy

Acromegaly-related sub/infertility, tidily related to suboptimal disease control (1/2 of cases), correlates with hyperprolactinemia (1/3 of patients), hypogonadotropic hypogonadism—mostly affecting the pituitary axis in hypopituitarism (10−80%), and negative effects of glucose profile (GP) anomalies (10−70%); thus, pregnancy is an exceptional event. Placental GH (Growth Hormone) increases from weeks 5−15 with a peak at week 37, stimulating liver IGF1 and inhibiting pituitary GH secreted by normal hypophysis, not by somatotropinoma. However, estrogens induce a GH resistance status, protecting the fetus form GH excess; thus a full-term, healthy pregnancy may be possible. This is a narrative review of acromegaly that approaches cardio-metabolic features (CMFs), somatotropinoma expansion (STE), management adjustment (MNA) and maternal-fetal outcomes (MFOs) during pregnancy. Based on our method (original, in extenso, English—published articles on PubMed, between January 2012 and September 2022), we identified 24 original papers—13 studies (3 to 141 acromegalic pregnancies per study), and 11 single cases reports (a total of 344 pregnancies and an additional prior unpublished report). With respect to maternal acromegaly, pregnancies are spontaneous or due to therapy for infertility (clomiphene, gonadotropins or GnRH) and, lately, assisted reproduction techniques (ARTs); there are no consistent data on pregnancies with paternal acromegaly. CMFs are the most important complications (7.7−50%), especially concerning worsening of HBP (including pre/eclampsia) and GP anomalies, including gestational diabetes mellitus (DM); the best predictor is the level of disease control at conception (IGF1), and, probably, family history of 2DM, and body mass index. STE occurs rarely (a rate of 0 to 9%); some of it symptoms are headache and visual field anomalies; it is treated with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) or alternatively dopamine agonists (DAs); lately, second trimester selective hypophysectomy has been used less, since pharmaco-therapy (PT) has proven safe. MNA: PT that, theoretically, needs to be stopped before conception—continued if there was STE or an inoperable tumor (no clear period of exposure, preferably, only first trimester). Most data are on octreotide > lanreotide, followed by DAs and pegvisomant, and there are none on pasireotide. Further follow-up is required: a prompt postpartum re-assessment of the mother’s disease; we only have a few data confirming the safety of SSAs during lactation and long-term normal growth and developmental of the newborn (a maximum of 15 years). MFO seem similar between PT + ve and PT − ve, regardless of PT duration; the additional risk is actually due to CMF. One study showed a 2-year median between hypophysectomy and pregnancy. Conclusion: Close surveillance of disease burden is required, particularly, concerning CMF; a personalized approach is useful; the level of statistical evidence is expected to expand due to recent progress in MNA and ART.

Recommendations for the diagnosis and radiological follow-up of pituitary neuroendocrine tumours

Pituitary neuroendocrine tumours (PitNETs) constitute a heterogeneous group of tumours with a gradually increasing incidence, partly accounted for by more sensitive imaging techniques and more extensive experience in neuroradiology in this regard. Although most PitNETs are indolent, some exhibit aggressive behaviour, and recurrence may be seen after surgical removal. The changes introduced in the WHO classification in 2017 and terminological debates in relation to neuroendocrine tumours warrant an update of the guidelines for the diagnosis, preoperative and postoperative management, and follow-up of response to treatment of PitNETs. This multidisciplinary document, an initiative of the Neuroendocrinology area of the Sociedad Española de Endocrinología y Nutrición [Spanish Society of Endocrinology and Nutrition] (SEEN), focuses on neuroimaging studies for the diagnosis, prognosis and follow-up of PitNETs. The basic requirements and elements that should be covered by magnetic resonance imaging are described, and a minimum radiology report to aid clinicians in treatment decision-making is proposed. This work supplements the consensus between the Neuroendocrinology area of the SEEN and the Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica [Spanish Society of Pathology] (SEAP) for the pathological study of PitNETs.

Long-term effects of somatostatin analogues in rat GH-secreting pituitary tumor cell lines

PURPOSE

First-generation somatostatin analogs, octreotide (OCT) and lanreotide, are the cornerstone for the medical treatment of growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary tumors. A new multireceptor analog, such as pasireotide (PAS), showed better activity than OCT in long-term treatment of patients with acromegaly, but modulation of intracellular key processes is still unclear in vitro. In this study, we evaluated the antitumor activity of OCT and PAS in two GH-secreting pituitary tumor cell lines, GH3 and GH4C1, after a long-term incubation.

METHODS

The effects of PAS and OCT on the cell viability, cell cycle, apoptosis, GH secretion, and tumor-induced angiogenesis have been evaluated through a colorimetric method (MTS Assay), DNA flow cytometry with propidium iodide, and Annexin V-FITC/propidium iodide staining, ELISA assay and zebrafish platform, respectively.

RESULTS

PAS showed a more potent antitumor activity compared to OCT in GH3 cell line exerted through inhibition of cell viability, perturbation of cell cycle progression, and induction of apoptosis after 6 days of incubation. A concomitant decrease in GH secretion has been observed after 2 days of incubation only with PAS. No effect on tumor-induced angiogenesis has been reported after treatment with OCT or PAS in zebrafish/tumor xenograft model.

CONCLUSION

Long-term incubation with PAS showed a more potent antitumor activity than that reported after OCT in GH3 cells, mainly modulated by a cell cycle perturbation and a relevant induction in apoptosis.

Factors associated with therapeutic response in acromegaly diagnosed in the elderly in Spain

CONTEXT

Some reports suggest that acromegaly in elderly patients has a more benign clinical behavior and could have a better response to first-generation long-acting somatostatin receptor ligands (SRL). However, there is no specific therapeutic protocol for this special subgroup of patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed at identifying predictors of response to SRL in elderly patients.

DESIGN

Multicentric retrospective nationwide study of patients diagnosed with acromegaly at or over the age of 65 years.

RESULTS

One-hundred and eighteen patients (34 men, 84 women, mean age at diagnosis 71.7 ± 5.4 years old) were included. Basal insulin-like growth factor type 1 (IGF-1) above the upper limit of normal (ULN) and growth hormone (GH) levels (mean ± SD) were 2.7 ± 1.4 and 11.0 ± 11.9 ng/ml, respectively. The mean maximal tumor diameter was 12.3 ± 6.4 mm, and up to 68.6% were macroadenoma. Seventy-two out of 118 patients (61.0%) underwent surgery as primary treatment. One-third of patients required first-line medical treatment due to a rejection of surgical treatment or non-suitability because of high surgical risk. After first-line surgery, 45/72 (63.9%) were in disease remission, and 16/34 (46.7%) of those treated with SRL had controlled disease. Patients with basal GH at diagnosis ≤6 ng/ml had lower IGF-1 levels and had smaller tumors, and more patients in this group reached control with SRL (72.7% vs. 33.3%; p < 0.04) [OR: 21.3, IC: 95% (2.4-91.1)], while male patients had a worse response [OR: 0.09, IC 95% (0.01-0.75)]. The predictive model curve obtained for SRL response showed an AUC of 0.82 CI (0.71-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

The most frequent phenotype in newly diagnosed acromegaly in the elderly includes small adenomas and moderately high IGF-1 levels. GH at diagnosis ≤6 ng/ml and female gender, but not age per se, were associated with a greater chance of response to SRL.

Resistance to first-generation somatostatin receptor ligands does not impair the results of gamma knife radiosurgery in acromegaly

OBJECTIVE

Gamma knife radiosurgery (GKRS) has proven to be an effective adjuvant treatment for patients with acromegaly. We performed the present study to investigate, which would be the outcome of GKRS, independently on the response to somatostatin receptor ligand (SRL).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

PATIENTS

Ninety-six patients with active acromegaly were included.

MEASUREMENTS

The cumulative probability of normalisation of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) levels after GKRS was assessed by the Kaplan-Meier method. The association of several clinical characteristics with GKRS outcomes was explored with the use of a Cox proportional-hazard model with the relative hazard ratio and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Resistance to SRL occurred in 39 of the 96 patients (40.6%). After GKRS, patients resistant to SRL had a 5- and 10-year probability of remission of 40.7% (95% CI: 23.7%-57.7%) and 75.9% (95% CI: 57.9%-93.9%), respectively. Patients responding to SRL had a 5- and 10-year probability of remission of 46.8% (95% CI: 32.2%-61.4%) and 58.1% (95% CI: 41.5%-74.7%), respectively. The difference was not significant (p = .48 by the log-rank test). Multivariate Cox analysis confirmed that the only independent variables associated with GKRS outcome were basal growth hormone (GH; p = .001) and IGF-1 multiple of the upper limit of normal levels before GKRS (p = .013).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate for the first time that the responsiveness to SRL has no effect on the probability to obtain remission of acromegaly after GKRS. The remission of disease occurred more frequently in patients who had lower GH and IGF-1 levels before GKRS.

gsp Mutation Is Not a Molecular Biomarker of Long-Term Response to First-Generation Somatostatin Receptor Ligands in Acromegaly

Simple Summary

Acromegaly treatment consists of surgical, medical, and radiation therapy. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands are the mainstay of medical therapy, with approximately 40% disease control rate. Several parameters have been evaluated as predictors of response to these drugs, including mutations in the stimulatory G-protein α subunit (gsp mutation), which is still controversial. In this study, we aimed to evaluate in a large series of patients whether gsp mutation predicts long-term response to medical treatment and to characterize the gsp mutated population. The ability to predict response to medical therapy would help to choose a therapy that presents higher odds of controlling the disease, which ultimately would reduce treatment costs and disease morbi-mortality.

Abstract

Background: It is still controversial if activating mutations in the stimulatory G-protein α subunit (gsp mutation) are a biomarker of response to first generation somatostatin receptor ligands (fg-SRL) treatment in acromegaly. Thus, we aimed to evaluate whether gsp mutation predicts long-term response to fg-SRL treatment and to characterize the phenotype of patients harboring gsp mutations. Methods: GNAS1 sequencing was performed by Sanger. SST2 and SST5 were analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and real-time RT-PCR. The cytokeratin granulation pattern was evaluated by IHC. Biochemical control was defined as GH < 1.0 ng/mL and normal age-adjusted IGF-I levels. Results: gsp mutation was found in 54 out of 136 patients evaluated. Biochemical control with fg-SRL treatment was similar in gsp+ and gsp- patients (37% vs. 25%, p = 0.219). Tumors harboring gsp mutation were smaller (p = 0.035) and had a lower chance of invading cavernous sinuses (p = 0.001). SST5 protein (p = 0.047) and mRNA (p = 0.013) expression levels were higher in wild-type tumors. Conclusions: In this largest series available in the literature, we concluded that gsp is not a molecular biomarker of response to fg-SRL treatment in acromegaly. However, the importance of its negative association with cavernous sinus invasion and SST5 expression needs to be further investigated.

Somatostatin-Dopamine Chimeric Molecules in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are a widely heterogeneous family of neoplasms arising from neuroendocrine cells, which are interspersed throughout the body. Despite NENs are relatively rare, their incidence and prevalence are constantly increasing probably due to the improvement in earlier diagnosis and patients’ management. When surgery is not curative, particularly for patients with metastatic disease, several medical options are available. Somatostatin analogues (SSA) are the first-line medical therapy for well-differentiated NENs. Interestingly, the heterodimerization of somatostatin receptors (SSTs) with dopamine receptors (DRs) has been discovered in NENs. This phenomenon results in hybrid receptors with enhanced functional activity. On these bases, chimeric molecules embracing somatostatin and dopamine features have been recently developed. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of the available preclinical and clinical data regarding chimeric somatostatin-dopamine agonists as a new class of “magic bullet” in the therapy of NENs.

Efficacy of a Novel Second-Generation Somatostatin-Dopamine Chimera (TBR-065) in Human Medullary Thyroid Cancer: A Preclinical Study

INTRODUCTION

Somatostatin and dopamine (DA) receptors have a pivotal role in controlling hormone secretion and cell proliferation in different neuroendocrine neoplasms, including medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). In the present preclinical study, we evaluated the anti-tumor activity of TBR-065 (formerly BIM-23B065), a second-generation somatostatin-DA chimera, in 2 human MTC cell lines.

METHODS

The effects of lanreotide (LAN) and TBR-065 on cell growth and proliferation, calcitonin (CT) secretion, cell cycle, apoptosis, cell migration, and tumor-induced angiogenesis have been evaluated through 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay, DNA flow cytometry with propidium iodide (PI), Annexin V-FITC/PI staining, electrochemiluminescence immuno assay, wound-healing assay, and zebrafish platform, respectively.

RESULTS

TBR-065 exerted a more prominent anti-tumor activity than LAN in both MTC cell lines, as shown by inhibition of cell proliferation (maximal inhibition in TT: -50.3 and -37.6%, respectively; in MZ-CRC-1: -58.8 and -27%, respectively) and migration (in TT: -42.7 and -22.9%, respectively; in MZ-CRC-1: -75.5 and -58.2%, respectively). Only the new chimera decreased significantly the fraction of cells in S phase (TT: -33.8%; MZ-CRC-1: -18.8%) and increased cells in G2/M phase (TT: +13%; MZ-CRC-1: +30.5%). In addition, TBR-065 exerted a more prominent pro-apoptotic effect than LAN in TT cells. A concomitant decrease in CT secretion was observed after 2 days of incubation with both drugs, with a more relevant effect of TBR-065. However, neither LAN nor TBR-065 showed any effect on tumor-induced angiogenesis, as evaluated using a zebrafish/tumor xenograft model.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

In MTC cell lines, a second-generation somatostatin-DA analog, TBR-065, exerts a more relevant anti-tumor activity than LAN, through modulation of cell cycle, induction of apoptosis, and reduction in migration. Further studies are required to establish whether TBR-065 has comparable potent inhibitory effects on tumor growth in vivo.

Pasireotide in the Personalized Treatment of Acromegaly

The delay in controlling the disease in patients who do not respond to first-line treatment with first generation somatostatin receptor ligands (first-generation SRLs) can be quantified in years, as every modification in the medical therapy requires some months to be fully evaluated. Considering this, acromegaly treatment should benefit from personalized medicine therapeutic approach by using biomarkers identifying drug response. Pasireotide has been positioned mostly as a compound to be used in first-generation SRLs resistant patients and after surgical failure, but sufficient data are now available to indicate it is a first line therapy for patients with certain characteristics. Pasireotide has been proved to be useful in patients in which hyperintensity T2 MRI signal is shown and in those depicting low SST2 and high expression of SST5, low or mutated AIP condition and sparsely granulated immunohistochemical pattern. This combination of clinical and pathological characteristics is unique for certain patients and seems to cluster in the same cases, strongly suggesting an etiopathogenic link. Thus, in this paper we propose to include this clinico-pathologic phenotype in the therapeutic algorithm, which would allow us to use as first line medical treatment those compounds with the highest potential for achieving the fastest control of GH hypersecretion as well as a positive effect upon tumor shrinkage, therefore accelerating the implementation of precision medicine for acromegaly. Moreover, we suggest the development, validation and clinical use of a pasireotide acute test, able to identify patients responsive to pasireotide LAR as the acute octreotide test is able to do for SRLs.

Somatostatin receptor expression and patients' response to targeted medical treatment in pituitary tumors: evidences and controversies

BACKGROUND

Somatostatin receptors (SSTs) are widely co-expressed in pituitary tumors. SST₂ and SST₅ are the most represented SST subtypes. First-generation somatostatin receptor ligands (SRLs) mainly target SST₂, while pasireotide, a multi-receptor ligand, shows high binding affinity for both SST₅ and SST₂. Therefore, SRLs are routinely used as medical treatment for GH-, TSH-, and ACTH-secreting pituitary tumors.

METHODS

Critical revision of literature data correlating SST expression with patients' response to SRLs.

RESULTS

SST₂ expression in somatroph tumors directly correlates with GH and IGF-1 decrease after first-generation SRL treatment. SST₂ immunohistochemistry represents a valuable tool to predict biochemical response to first-generation SRLs in acromegalic patients. Pasireotide seems to exert its biological effects via SST₂ in unselected patients. However, in those subjects resistant to first-generation SRLs, harbouring tumors with negligible SST₂ expression, pasireotide can act throughout SST₅. More than somatotroph tumors, TSH-omas represent the paradigm of tumors showing a satisfactory response to SRLs. This is probably due to the high SST₂ expression observed in nearly 100% of cases, as well as to the balanced amount of SST₅. In corticotroph tumors, pasireotide mainly act via SST₅, although there is a need for translational studies correlating its efficacy with SST expression in this peculiar tumor histotype.

CONCLUSIONS

The assumption "more target receptor, more drug efficacy" is not straightforward for SRLs. The complex pathophysiology of SSTs, and the technical challenges faced to translate research findings into clinical practice, still need our full commitment to make receptor evaluation a worthwhile procedure for individualizing treatment decisions.