1
|
DE Luca S, Checcucci E, Piramide F, Russo F, Alessio P, Garrou D, Peretti D, Sica M, Volpi G, Piana A, DE Cillis S, Amparore D, Manfredi M, Fiori C, Porpiglia F. MRI/real-time ultrasound image fusion guided high-intensity focused ultrasound: a prospective comparative and functional analysis of different ablative techniques. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:172-179. [PMID: 36286396 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.04853-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this paper was to compare safety and functional outcomes of total, hemi and focal ablation by the latest focal high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) device. METHODS This is a prospective study including patients with low to intermediate-risk PCa treated with HIFU by Focal One® device from 11/2018 to 3/2020. Before the treatment all patients underwent mp-magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and subsequent MRI/transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion and standard biopsy. Patients were stratified according to the type of ablation: total, hemi- or focal ablation. Functional data (IPSS, Quality of Life [QoL], IIEF-5, maximum flow [Qmax] and post void residual [PVR] at flowmetry) were assessed preoperatively and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Moreover, the urinary symptoms reported by patients at IPSS questionnaire were divided in "irritative" and "obstructive" and compared. RESULTS One hundred patients were enrolled. Median prostate volume and lesion diameter were 46 (IQR 25-75) mL and 10 (IQR 6-13) mm. 15, 50 and 35 patients underwent total, hemi- and focal ablation, respectively. No differences were found between them except for operative time (lower in the focal group, P<0.01). Significant lower incidence of irritative symptoms was identified in the focal group compared to the others (P<0.05 at 1 and 3 months of follow-up). No differences were found among the baseline status and the postoperative assessment in terms of obstructive IPSS items, IIEF-5, QoL, Qmax and PVR (all P value>0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our study suggests that patients' specific HIFU tailoring with the MRI/real-time TRUS Guidance by Focal One® device is able to minimize the side effects of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano DE Luca
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Enrico Checcucci
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Federico Piramide
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy -
| | - Filippo Russo
- Department of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Alessio
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Diletta Garrou
- Department of Surgery, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Turin, Italy
| | - Dario Peretti
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Michele Sica
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Gabriele Volpi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Alberto Piana
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabrina DE Cillis
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Matteo Manfredi
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Cristian Fiori
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Di Mauro E, Di Bello F, Califano G, Morra S, Creta M, Celentano G, Abate M, Fraia A, Pezone G, Marino C, Cilio S, Capece M, La Rocca R, Imbimbo C, Longo N, Colla' Ruvolo C. Incidence and Predicting Factors of Histopathological Features at Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy in the mpMRI Era: Results of a Single Tertiary Referral Center. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2023; 59:medicina59030625. [PMID: 36984626 PMCID: PMC10057318 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59030625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: To describe the predictors of cribriform variant status and perineural invasion (PNI) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) histology. To define the rates of upgrading between biopsy specimens and final histology and their possible predictive factors in prostate cancer (PCa) patients undergoing RARP. Material and Methods: Within our institutional database, 265 PCa patients who underwent prostate biopsies and consecutive RARP at our center were enrolled (2018-2022). In the overall population, two independent multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) predicting the presence of PNI or cribriform variant status at RARP were performed. In low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients according to D'Amico risk classification, three independent multivariable LRMs were fitted to predict upgrading. Results: Of all, 30.9% were low-risk, 18.9% were intermediate-risk and 50.2% were high-risk PCa patients. In the overall population, the rates of the cribriform variant and PNI at RARP were 55.8% and 71.1%, respectively. After multivariable LRMs predicting PNI, total tumor length in biopsy cores (>24 mm [OR: 2.37, p-value = 0.03], relative to <24 mm) was an independent predictor. After multivariable LRMs predicting cribriform variant status, PIRADS (3 [OR:15.37], 4 [OR: 13.57] or 5 [OR: 16.51] relative to PIRADS 2, all p = 0.01) and total tumor length in biopsy cores (>24 mm [OR: 2.47, p = 0.01], relative to <24 mm) were independent predicting factors. In low- and intermediate-risk PCa patients, the rate of upgrading was 74.4% and 78.0%, respectively. After multivariable LRMs predicting upgrading, PIRADS (PIRADS 3 [OR: 7.01], 4 [OR: 16.98] or 5 [OR: 20.96] relative to PIRADS 2, all p = 0.01) was an independent predicting factor. Conclusions: RARP represents a tailored and risk-adapted treatment strategy for PCa patients. The indication of RP progressively migrates to high-risk PCa after a pre-operative assessment. Specifically, the PIRADS score at mpMRI should guide the decision-making process of urologists for PCa patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ernesto Di Mauro
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Di Bello
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Gianluigi Califano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Simone Morra
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Creta
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Celentano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Abate
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Agostino Fraia
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Gabriele Pezone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Claudio Marino
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Capece
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Claudia Colla' Ruvolo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", Via Sergio Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Porcaro AB, Panunzio A, Bianchi A, Sebben M, Gallina S, De Michele M, Orlando R, Serafin E, Mazzucato G, Vidiri S, D'Aietti D, Princiotta A, Montanaro F, Marafioti Patuzzo G, De Marco V, Brunelli M, Pagliarulo V, Cerruto MA, Tafuri A, Antonelli A. Prognostic Impact and Clinical Implications of Unfavorable Upgrading in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of a Single Tertiary Referral Center. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14246055. [PMID: 36551541 PMCID: PMC9776665 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14246055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate predictors and the prognostic impact of favorable vs. unfavorable tumor upgrading among low-risk prostate cancer (LR PCa) patients treated with robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: From January 2013 to October 2020, LR PCa patients treated with RARP at our institution were identified. Unfavorable tumor upgrading was defined as the presence of an International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade group at final pathology > 2. Disease relapse was coded as biochemical recurrence and/or local recurrence and/or presence of distant metastases. Regression analyses tested the association between clinical and pathological features and the risk of unfavorable tumor upgrading and disease relapse. Results: Of the 237 total LR PCa patients, 60 (25.3%) harbored unfavorable tumor upgrading. Disease relapse occurred in 20 (8.4%) patients. Unfavorable upgrading represented an independent predictor of disease relapse, even after adjustment for other clinical and pathological variables. Conversely, favorable tumor upgrading did not show any statistically significant association with PCa relapse. Unfavorable tumor upgrading was associated with tumors being larger (OR: 1.03; p = 0.031), tumors extending beyond the gland (OR: 8.54, p < 0.001), age (OR: 1.07, p = 0.009), and PSA density (PSAD) ≥ 0.15 ng/mL/cc (OR: 1.07, p = 0.009). Conclusions: LR PCa patients with unfavorable upgrading at final pathology were more likely to be older, to have PSAD ≥ 0.15 ng/mL/cc, and to experience disease relapse. Unfavorable tumor upgrading is an issue to consider when counseling these patients to avoid delayed treatments, which may impair cancer-specific survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Ospedale Sacro Cuore Don Calabria, 37024 Negrar, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Mario De Michele
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Mazzucato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Vidiri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Damiano D'Aietti
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Princiotta
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Montanaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Giulia Marafioti Patuzzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | | | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| | | | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata of Verona, 37126 Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fallara G, Fankhauser CD, Martini A. Comment on: "Improving the stratification of intermediate risk prostate cancer". Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022; 74:819-821. [PMID: 36629816 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.22.05209-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Fallara
- Unit of Urology, Division of Experimental Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy.,Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospital, London, UK
| | | | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA -
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Porcaro AB, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Cerrato C, Tafuri A, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Orlando R, Serafin E, Gozzo A, Migliorini F, Antoniolli SZ, Lacola V, De Marco V, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Siracusano S, Antonelli A. Endogenous testosterone density as ratio of endogenous testosterone levels on prostate volume predicts tumor upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 2021; 53:2505-2515. [PMID: 34677784 PMCID: PMC8599336 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-021-03008-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 09/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate preoperative endogenous testosterone (ET) density (ETD), defined as the ratio of ET on prostate volume, and tumor upgrading risk in low-risk prostate cancer (PCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS From November 2014 to December 2019, 172 low-risk patients had ET (nmol/L) measured. ETD, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) and the ratio of percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC) to prostate volume (PV), defined as BPC density (BPCD), were evaluated. Associations with tumor upgrading in the surgical specimen were assessed by statistical methods. RESULTS Overall, 121 patients (70.3%) had tumor upgrading, which was predicted by BPCD (odds ratio, OR = 4.640; 95% CI 1.903-11.316; p = 0.001; overall accuracy: 70.3%). On multivariate analysis, tumor upgrading and clinical density factors related to each other for BPCD being predicted by ETD (regression coefficient, b = 0.032; 95% CI 0.021-0.043; p < 0.0001), PSAD (b = 1.962; 95% CI 1.067-2.586; p < 0.0001) and tumor upgrading (b = 0.259; 95% CI 0.112-0.406; p = 0.001). According to the model, as BPCD increased, ETD and PSAD increased, but the increase was higher for upgraded cases who showed either higher tumor load but significantly lower mean levels of either ET or PSA. CONCLUSIONS As ETD increased, higher tumor loads were assessed; however, in upgraded patients, lower ET was also detected. ETD might stratify low-risk disease for tumor upgrading features.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Rossella Orlando
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Emanuele Serafin
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Stefano Zecchini Antoniolli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Lacola
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Immunohistochemistry for Prostate Biopsy-Impact on Histological Prostate Cancer Diagnoses and Clinical Decision Making. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 28:2123-2133. [PMID: 34207594 PMCID: PMC8293248 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28030197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2021] [Revised: 05/15/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To test the value of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in prostate biopsies for changes in biopsy results and its impact on treatment decision-making. METHODS Between January 2017-June 2020, all patients undergoing prostate biopsies were identified and evaluated regarding additional IHC staining for diagnostic purpose. Final pathologic results after radical prostatectomy (RP) were analyzed regarding the effect of IHC at biopsy. RESULTS Of 606 biopsies, 350 (58.7%) received additional IHC staining. Of those, prostate cancer (PCa) was found in 208 patients (59.4%); while in 142 patients (40.6%), PCa could be ruled out through IHC. IHC patients harbored significantly more often Gleason 6 in biopsy (p < 0.01) and less suspicious baseline characteristics than patients without IHC. Of 185 patients with positive IHC and PCa detection, IHC led to a change in biopsy results in 81 (43.8%) patients. Of these patients with changes in biopsy results due to IHC, 42 (51.9%) underwent RP with 59.5% harboring ≥pT3 and/or Gleason 7-10. CONCLUSIONS Patients with IHC stains had less suspicious characteristics than patients without IHC. Moreover, in patients with positive IHC and PCa detection, a change in biopsy results was observed in >40%. Patients with changes in biopsy results partly underwent RP, in which 60% harbored significant PCa.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tafuri A, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Sebben M, Shakir A, Gozzo A, Odorizzi K, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Ornaghi P, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Cerruto MA, Artibani W, Siracusano S, Antonelli A, Porcaro AB. Predictors of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients with Clinically Localized Prostate Cancer Who Undergo Radical Prostatectomy and Extended Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection: The Role of Obesity. Urol Int 2020; 105:362-369. [PMID: 33059351 DOI: 10.1159/000510008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE In patients with intermediate- and high-risk localized prostate cancer (PCa), improving the detection of occult lymph node metastases could play a pivotal role for therapeutic counseling and planning. The recent literature shows that several clinical factors may be related to PCa aggressiveness. The aim of this study is to investigate the potential associations between clinical factors and the risk of multiple lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients with intermediate- and high-risk localized PCa (cT1/2, cN0, and ISUP grading group >2 and/or prostate-specific antigen (PSA) >10 ng/mL) who underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND). MATERIALS AND METHODS In a period ranging from January 2014 to December 2018, 880 consecutive patients underwent RP with ePLND for PCa. Among these, 481 met the inclusion criteria and were selected. Data were prospectively collected within an institutional dataset and retrospectively analyzed. Age (years), body mass index (BMI; kg/m2), PSA (ng/mL), prostate volume (mL), and biopsy positive cores (BPC; %) were recorded for each case. BMI and BPC were considered continuous and categorical variables, respectively. The logistic regression models evaluated the association of clinical factors with the risk of nodal metastases. RESULTS LNI was detected in 73/418 patients (15.2%) of whom 40/418 (8.3%) harbored multiple LNI (median 2, IQR: 3-4). On multivariate analysis, BMI was independently associated with the risk of multiple LNI in the pathological specimen when compared with patients without LNI (OR = 1.147; p = 0.018), as well as the percentage of biopsy positive cores (OR = 1.028; p < 0.0001) and European Association of Urology high-risk class (OR = 5.486; p < 0.0001). BMI was the only predictor of multiple LNI when compared with patients with 1 positive node (OR = 1.189, p = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS In intermediate- and high-risk localized PCa, BMI was an independent predictor of the risk of multiple lymph node metastases. The inclusion of BMI within LNI risk calculators could be helpful, and a detailed counseling in obese patients should be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Sciences, "G. d'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.,USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Katia Odorizzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy,
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Porcaro AB, Tafuri A, Sebben M, Novella G, Processali T, Pirozzi M, Amigoni N, Rizzetto R, Shakir A, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Migliorini F, Siracusano S, Artibani W. Elevated prostate volume index and prostatic chronic inflammation reduce the number of positive cores at first prostate biopsy set: results in 945 consecutive patients. Int Braz J Urol 2020; 46:545-556. [PMID: 32213210 PMCID: PMC7239280 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2019.0146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the association between prostate volume index (PVI), and prostatic chronic inflammation (PCI) as predictors of prostate cancer (PCA). PVI is the ratio between the central transition zone volume (CTZV) and the peripheral zone volume (PZV). MATERIALS AND METHODS Parameters evaluated included age, prostate specific antigen (PSA), total prostate volume (TPV), PSA density (PSAD), digital rectal exam (DRE), PVI, PCI and number of positive cores (NPC). All patients underwent baseline 14-core, trans-perineal random biopsies. Associations of parameters with the NPC were investigated by univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis. RESULTS Between September 2010 to September 2017, 945 patients were evaluated. PCA was detected in 477 cases (50.7%), PCI in 205 cases (21.7%). PCA patients, compared to negative cases, were older (68.3 vs. 64.4 years) with smaller TPV (36 vs. 48.3mL) and CTZV (19.2 vs. 25.4), higher PSAD (0.24 vs. 0.15ng/mL/mL), further PVI values were lower (0.9 vs. 1.18) and biopsy cores less frequently involved by PCI (9.4% vs. 34.2%). High PVI and the presence of PCI were independent negative predictors of NPC in model I considering PSA and TVP (PVI, regression coefficient, RC -0,6; p=0.002) and PCI (RC -1,4; p<0.0001); and in model II considering PSAD (PVI:RC -0,7; p<0,0001; and PCI: RC -1,5; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS High PVI and the presence of PCI lowered the mean rate of NPC and is associated with less aggressive tumor biology expressed by low tumor burden. PVI can give prognostic information before planning baseline random biopsies. Confirmatory studies are required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
- USC Institute of Urology, and Catherine and Joseph Aresty, Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology, and Catherine and Joseph Aresty, Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tafuri A, Sebben M, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Shakir A, Processali T, Pirozzi M, Gozzo A, Odorizzi K, De Michele M, Gallina S, Bianchi A, Ornaghi PI, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Cerruto MA, Siracusano S, Artibani W, Antonelli A, Porcaro AB. Basal total testosterone serum levels predict biopsy and pathological ISUP grade group in a large cohort of Caucasian prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol 2020; 12:1756287220929481. [PMID: 32636934 PMCID: PMC7318822 DOI: 10.1177/1756287220929481] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims: The study aimed to evaluate associations of preoperative total testosterone (TT) with the risk of aggressive prostate cancer (PCA). Materials & methods: From 2014 to 2018, basal TT levels were measured in 726 consecutive PCA patients. Patients were classified according to the International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) system. Aggressive PCA was defined by the detection of ISUP > 2 in the surgical specimen. The logistic regression model evaluated the association of TT and other clinical factors with aggressive PCA. Results: On univariate analysis, there was a significant association of basal TT with the risk of aggressive PCA as well as age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA), percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC), tumor clinical stage (cT), and biopsy ISUP grade groups. On multivariate analysis, two models were considered. The first (model I) excluded biopsy ISUP grading groups and the second (model II) included biopsy ISUP grade groups. Multivariate model I, revealed TT as well as all other variables, was an independent predictor of the risk of aggressive disease [odds ratio (OR) = 1.585; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.113–2.256; p = 0.011]. Elevated basal PSA greater than 20 µg/dl was associated with the risk of aggressive PCA. Multivariate model II revealed that basal TT levels maintain a positive association between aggressive PCA, whereas age, BPC, and clinical stage cT3 lost significance. In the final adjusted model, the level of risk of TT did not change from univariate analysis (OR = 1.525; 95% CI: 1.035–2.245; p = 0.011). Conclusion: Elevated preoperative TT levels are associated with the risk of aggressive PCA in the surgical specimen. TT may identify patients who are at risk of aggressive PCA in the low and intermediate European Association of Urology (EAU) risk classes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology, Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandra Gozzo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Katia Odorizzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mario De Michele
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Sebastian Gallina
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alberto Bianchi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paola Irene Ornaghi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Ospedale Civile Maggiore, Polo Chirurgico Confortini, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tafuri A, Sebben M, Novella G, Pirozzi M, Processali T, Shakir A, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Bernasconi R, Brunelli M, Cerruto MA, Siracusano S, Antonelli A, Artibani W, Porcaro AB. Prostatic chronic inflammation and prostate cancer risk at baseline random biopsy: Analysis of predictors. Arab J Urol 2020; 18:148-154. [PMID: 33029424 PMCID: PMC7473292 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2020.1757335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To evaluate predictors of prostatic chronic inflammation (PCI) and prostate cancer (PCa) in patients undergoing transperineal baseline random prostatic needle biopsies (BNB). Patient and methods According to BNB outcomes, patients were divided into four groups: cases without PCI or PCa (Control group), cases with PCI only (PCI group), cases with PCa and PCI (PCa+PCI group) and cases with PCa only (PCa group). A multinomial logistic regression model was used to evaluate the association of clinical factors with BNB outcomes. Additionally, clinical factors associated with the risk of PCa in the overall population were investigated using a multivariable logistic regression model (univariate and multivariate analysis). Results Overall, 945 patients were evaluated and grouped as follows: Control group, 308 patients (32.6%); PCI group, 160 (16.9%); PCa+PCI group, 45 (4.8%); and PCa group, 432 (45.7%). Amongst these, PCa was independently predicted by age (odds ratio [OR] 1.081), prostate specific-antigen level (PSA; OR 1.159), transition zone volume (TZV; OR 0.916), and abnormal digital rectal examination (DRE; OR 1.962). PCa and PCI (4.8%) were independently predicted by age (OR 1.081), PSA level (OR 1.122) and TZV (OR 0.954). In the group without PCa, the PSA level was the only factor associated with the risk of PCI when compared to the control group (OR 1.051, P = 0.042). Among patients with PCa, independent factors associated with the risk of only PCa compared to cases with PCA+PCI were TZV (OR 0.972) and number of positive cores (OR 1.149). In the overall population, PCI was the strongest predictor of a decreased risk of PCa (multivariate model, OR 0.212; P < 0.001) Conclusions At BNB, PCI was associated with both a decreased risk of PCa and less aggressive tumour biology amongst patients with PCa. The presence of PCI on biopsy cores should be reported because of its implications in clinical practice. Abbreviations BGG: biopsy Gleason Group; BPC: biopsy positive (cancer) cores; BMI: body mass index; FGF-2: fibroblast growth factor 2; IL: interleukin; ISUP: International Society of Urologic Pathology; NIH: National Institutes of Health; OR: odds ratio; PCa: prostate cancer; PCI: prostatic chronic inflammation; TGF: transforming growth factor; TPV: total prostate volume; TZV: transition zone volume
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.,Department of Neuroscience, Imaging and Clinical Science, Physiology and Pathophisiology, "G. D'Annunzio" University, Chieti, Italy.,USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bernasconi
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria A Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tafuri A, Sebben M, Shakir A, Pirozzi M, Processali T, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Artibani W, Antonelli A, Porcaro AB. Endogenous testosterone mirrors prostate cancer aggressiveness: correlation between basal testosterone serum levels and prostate cancer European Urology Association clinical risk classes in a large cohort of Caucasian patients. Int Urol Nephrol 2020; 52:1261-1269. [PMID: 32016908 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-020-02398-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2019] [Accepted: 01/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between basal total testosterone (TT) levels with the European Association of Urology (EAU) risk classes at the time of diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCA). METHODS A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was carried out between November 2014 and March 2018. Preoperative basal TT levels and PSA were measured in 601 consecutive Caucasian patients who were not under androgen deprivation and undergoing surgery at a tertiary referral center. Patients were classified into low (reference group), intermediate- and high-risk/locally advanced classes. The multinomial logistic regression model evaluated associations of TT and other clinical factors with EAU risk classes. RESULTS One hundred twenty four patients (24%) were low risk, 316 (52.6%) were intermediate, 199 (16.5%) were high risk and 42 (7%) were locally advanced. Median circulating basal TT levels increased along EAU classes. TT, PSA, percentage of biopsy-positive cores and tumor clinical stage were independently associated with the high-risk class (odds ratio, OR = 1.002; p = 0.030) but were not associated with intermediate-risk or locally advanced PCA when compared to the low-risk class. TT above the median value was an independent predictor of high-risk class PCA. CONCLUSIONS Basal TT levels are positively associated with low, intermediate and high EAU risk classes. The association is significant for the high-risk class when compared to the low-risk group, but was lost in locally advanced risk class. In PCA patients, high TT serum levels are associated with high-risk disease. Endogenous TT should be considered as a biological marker for assessing EAU PCA risk classes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, 37126, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Porcaro AB, Tafuri A, Inverardi D, Amigoni N, Sebben M, Pirozzi M, Processali T, Rizzetto R, Shakir A, Cerrato C, Tiso L, Panunzio A, DE Michele M, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Artibani W. Incidental prostate cancer after transurethral resection of the prostate: analysis of incidence and risk factors in 458 patients. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2020; 73:471-480. [PMID: 32003204 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.19.03564-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors of incidental prostate cancer (IPCA) in a contemporary cohort of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) patients who underwent trans-urethral resection of the prostate (TURP). METHODS A series of 458 consecutive patients who underwent TURP were evaluated between January 2016 to June 2018. Evaluated factors included age (years), Body Mass Index (BMI; kg/square meters), treatment with inhibitors of 5-alpha reductase, previous prostate biopsies, basal prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels (ng/mL), serum leukocyte count (×109/L), weight of resected prostate tissue (grams), grade and stage of IPCA. The multivariate logistic regression model evaluated associations of significant clinical factors with the risk of IPCA. RESULTS Overall, IPCA was detected in 30 of 454 patients (6.6%). A mean of 21.8 g of tissue was resected. The mean number of positive chips was 5.6 (mean percentage 3.9%) with tumor grade group 1 in 22 cases (73.4%) and tumor stage cT1a in 23 patients (76.7%). On multivariate analysis, independent factors that were positively associated with the risk of IPCA were BMI (odds ratio, OR=1.121; P=0.017) and leukocyte count (OR=1.144; P=0.027). CONCLUSIONS In a contemporary cohort of patients undergoing TURP for the treatment of LUTS, the risk of IPCA was not negligible with a rate of being 6.6%. BMI and serum leukocyte count were found to be independent factors that were positively associated with the risk of IPCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy -
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Davide Inverardi
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Leone Tiso
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mario DE Michele
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Verona University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tafuri A, Sebben M, Pirozzi M, Processali T, Shakir A, Rizzetto R, Amigoni N, Tiso L, De Michele M, Panunzio A, Cerrato C, Migliorini F, Novella G, De Marco V, Siracusano S, Artibani W, Porcaro AB. Predictive Factors of the Risk of Long-Term Hospital Readmission after Primary Prostate Surgery at a Single Tertiary Referral Center: Preliminary Report. Urol Int 2020; 104:465-475. [PMID: 31991418 DOI: 10.1159/000505409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the predictors of the risk of long-term hospital readmission after radical prostatectomy (RP) in a single tertiary referral center where both open RP (ORP) and robot assisted RP (RARP) are performed. MATERIALS AND METHODS The risk of readmission was evaluated by clinical, pathological, and perioperative factors. Skilled and experienced surgeons performed the 2 surgical approaches. Patients were followed for complications and hospital readmission for a period of 6 months. The association of factors with the risk of readmission was assessed by Cox's multivariate proportional hazards. RESULTS From December 2013 to 2017, 885 patients underwent RP. RARP was performed in 733 cases and ORP in 152 subjects. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) was performed in 479 patients. Hospital readmission was detected in 46 cases (5.2%). Using a multivariate model, independent factors associated with the risk of hospital readmission were seminal vesicle invasion (hazard ratio [HR] 2.065; 95% CI 1.116-3.283; p = 0.021), ORP (HR 3.506; 95% CI 1.919-6.405; p < 0.0001), and ePLND (HR 5.172; 95% CI 1.778-15.053; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS In a large single tertiary referral center, independent predictors of the risk of long-term hospital readmission after RP included ORP, ePLND, and seminal vesicle invasion. When surgery is chosen as a primary treatment of PCA, patients should be informed of the risk of long-term hospital readmission and its related risk factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.,USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology and Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Leone Tiso
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Mario De Michele
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Andrea Panunzio
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy,
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
The impact of extended pelvic lymph node dissection on the risk of hospital readmission within 180 days after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. World J Urol 2020; 38:2799-2809. [PMID: 31980875 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03094-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Accepted: 01/10/2020] [Indexed: 10/25/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the factors associated with the risk of hospital readmission after robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) with or without extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) for prostate cancer (PCA) over a long term. MATERIALS AND METHODS The risk of readmission was evaluated by clinical, pathological, and perioperative factors. Skilled and experienced surgeons performed the procedures. Patients were followed for complications and hospital readmission for a period of six months. The logistic regression model and Cox's proportional hazards assessed the association of factors with the risk of readmission. RESULTS From January 2013 to December 2018, 890 patients underwent RARP; ePLND was performed in 495 of these patients. Hospital readmission was detected in 25 cases (2.8%); moreover, it was more frequent when RARP was performed with ePLND (4.4% of cases) than without (0.8% of patients). On the final multivariate model, ePLND was the only independent factor that was positively associated with the risk of hospital readmission (hazard ratio, HR = 5935; 95%CI 1777-19,831; p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS Over the long term after RARP for PCA, the risk of hospital readmission is associated with ePLND. In patients who underwent RARP and ePLND, 4.4% of them had a readmission, compared to RARP alone, in which only 0.8% of cases had a readmission. When ePLND is planned for staging pelvic lymph nodes, patients should be informed of the increased risk of hospital readmission.
Collapse
|
15
|
Linear extent of positive surgical margin impacts biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in a high-volume center. J Robot Surg 2020; 14:663-675. [PMID: 31893344 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-01039-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
The objective of this study is to evaluate if surgeon volume and stratifying positive surgical margins (PSM) into focal and non-focal may differentially impact the risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Between January 2013 and December 2017, 732 consecutive patients were evaluated. The population included negative cases (control group) and PSM subjects (study group). PSMs were stratified as focal (≤ 1 mm) or non-focal (> 1 mm). A logistic regression model assessed the independent association of factors with the risk of PSM. The risk of BCR of PSM and other factors was assessed by Cox's multivariate proportional hazards. Overall, 192 (26.3%) patients had PSM focal in 133 patients; non-focal in 59 cases. Focal PSM was associated with the percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC; OR 1.011; p = 0.015), extra-capsular extension (pT3a stage; OR 2.064; p = 0.016), seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b; OR 2.150; p = 0.010), body mass index (odds ratio, OR 0.914; p = 0.006), and high surgeon volume (OR 0.574; p = 0.006). BPC (OR 1.013; p = 0.044), pT3a (OR 4.832; p < 0.0001) and pT3b stage (OR 5.153; p = 0.001) were independent predictors of the risk of non-focal PSM. Surgeon volume was not a predictor of non-focal PSM (p = 0.224). Independent factors associated with the risk of BCR were baseline PSA (hazard ratio, HR 1.064; p = 0.004), BPC (HR 1.015; p = 0.027), ISUP biopsy grade group (BGG) 2/3 (HR 2.966; p 0.003) and BGG 4/5 (HR 3.122; p = 0.022) pathologic grade group 4/5 (HR 3.257; p = 0.001), pT3b (HR 2.900; p = 0.003), and non-focal PSM (HR 2.287; p = 0.012). Surgeon volume was not a predictor of BCR (p = 0.253). High surgeon volume is an independent factor that lowers the risk of focal PSM. Surgeon volume does not affect non-focal PSM and BCR. Negative as well as focal PSM are not associated with BCR.
Collapse
|
16
|
Porcaro AB, Tafuri A, Sebben M, Amigoni N, Processali T, Pirozzi M, Rizzetto R, Shakir A, Corsi P, Tiso L, Cerrato C, Migliorini F, Novella G, Brunelli M, Bernasconi R, De Marco V, Siracusano S, Artibani W. High surgeon volume and positive surgical margins can predict the risk of biochemical recurrence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Ther Adv Urol 2019; 11:1756287219878283. [PMID: 31579118 PMCID: PMC6759701 DOI: 10.1177/1756287219878283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to determine whether any clinical factors are independent predictors of positive surgical margins (PSM), and to assess the association of PSM and biochemical recurrence (BR) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Methods: The population included cases with negative surgical margins (control group) and patients with PSM (study group). Tumor grade was evaluated according to the International Society of Urologic Pathology (ISUP) system. A logistic regression model assessed the independent association of factors with the risk of PSM. The risk of BR was assessed by Cox’s multivariate proportional hazards. Results: A total of 732 consecutive patients were evaluated. Extend pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) was performed in 342 cases (46.7%). Overall, 192 cases (26.3%) had PSM. The risk of PSM was positively associated with the percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC; odds ratio, OR = 1.012; p = 0.004), extracapsular extension (pT3a; OR=2.702; p < 0.0001), invasion of seminal vesicle (pT3b; OR = 2.889; p < 0.0001), but inversely with body mass index (OR = 0.936; p = 0.021), and high surgeon volume (OR = 0.607; p = 0.006). Independent clinical factors associated with the risk of BR were baseline prostate-specific antigen (PSA; hazard ratio, HR = 1.064; p = 0.004), BPC (HR = 1.015; p = 0.027), ISUP biopsy grade group (BGG) 2/3 (HR = 2.966; p = 0.003), and BGG 4/5 (HR = 3.122; p = 0.022). Pathologic factors associated with the risk of BR were ISUP group 4/5 (HR = 3.257; p = 0.001), pT3b (HR = 2.900; p = 0.003), and PSM (HR = 2.096; p = 0.045). Conclusions: In our cohort, features related to host, tumor, and surgeon volume are associated with the risk of PSM, which is also an independent parameter predicting BR after RARP. The surgical volume of the operating surgeon is an independent factor that decreases the risk of PSM, and, as such, the risk of BR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Benito Porcaro
- Department of Urology Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Piazzale Stefani 1, Verona, 37126, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- USC Institute of Urology, and Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paolo Corsi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Leone Tiso
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Filippo Migliorini
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bernasconi
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Porcaro AB, Tafuri A, Sebben M, Processali T, Pirozzi M, Shakir A, Amigoni N, Rizzetto R, Brunelli M, Migliorini F, Siracusano S, Artibani W. Total testosterone density predicts high tumor load and disease reclassification of prostate cancer: results in 144 low-risk patients who underwent radical prostatectomy. Int Urol Nephrol 2019; 51:2169-2180. [DOI: 10.1007/s11255-019-02263-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
|
18
|
Porcaro AB, Tafuri A, Sebben M, Processali T, Pirozzi M, Amigoni N, Rizzetto R, Shakir A, Cacciamani GE, Brunelli M, Siracusano S, Cerruto MA, Artibani W. Body Mass Index and prostatic-specific antigen are predictors of prostate cancer metastases in patients undergoing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymph node dissection. MINERVA UROL NEFROL 2019; 71:516-523. [PMID: 31241272 DOI: 10.23736/s0393-2249.19.03401-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to investigate the risk factors contributing to multiple lymph node invasion (LNI) in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) during robot assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). METHODS A total of 211 patients who underwent RARP and ePNLD from June 2013 to March 2017 were classified according to lymph node status in the surgical specimen (absent, single or multiple). Risk factors of LNI were evaluated by the multinomial logistic regression model. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and area under the curve (AUC) were used to assess the efficacy of factors and model evaluation. RESULTS On multivariate analysis, the risk of multiple LNI, was independently increased by Body Mass Index (BMI) (odds ratio [OR] 1.194; P=0.026) and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) (OR=1.089; P=0.014) when compared to patients without LNI. ROC curves indicated that both BMI (AUC=0.702) and PSA (AUC=0.732) had fair discrimination power. For each unit of increase in PSA, the odds of multiple lymph node invasion increased by 8.9% and for each unit increase of BMI, the odds of multiple LNI increased by 19.4%. CONCLUSIONS The risk of multiple LNI was independently predicted by PSA and BMI with fair discrimination power.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy -
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,, Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- , Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni E Cacciamani
- , Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Salvatore Siracusano
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Maria Angela Cerruto
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Porcaro AB, Tafuri A, Sebben M, Corsi P, Processali T, Pirozzi M, Amigoni N, Rizzetto R, Shakir A, Cacciamani G, Mariotto A, Brunelli M, Bernasconi R, Novella G, De Marco V, Artibani W. Surgeon volume and body mass index influence positive surgical margin risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Results in 732 cases. Arab J Urol 2019; 17:234-242. [PMID: 31489241 PMCID: PMC6711124 DOI: 10.1080/2090598x.2019.1619276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate clinicopathological and perioperative factors associated with the risk of focal and non-focal positive surgical margins (PSMs) after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP). Patients and methods: The study was retrospective and excluded patients who were under androgen-deprivation therapy or had prior treatments. The population included: negative SM cases (control group), focal and non-focal PSM cases (study groups). PSMs were classified as focal when the linear extent of cancer invasion was ≤1 mm and non-focal when >1 mm. The independent association of factors with the risk of focal and non-focal PSMs was assessed by multinomial logistic regression. Results: In all, 732 patients underwent RARP, from January 2013 to December 2017. An extended pelvic lymph node dissection was performed in 342 cases (46.7%). In all, 192 cases (26.3%) had PSMs, which were focal in 133 (18.2%) and non-focal in 59 (8.1%). Independent factors associated with the risk of focal PSMs were body mass index (odds ratio [OR] 0.914; P = 0.006), percentage of biopsy positive cores (BPC; OR 1.011; P = 0.015), pathological extracapsular extension (pathological tumour stage [pT]3a; OR 2.064; P = 0.016), and seminal vesicle invasion (pT3b; OR 2.150; P = 0.010). High surgeon volume was a protective factor in having focal PSM (OR 0.574; P = 0.006). Independent predictors of non-focal PSMs were BPC (OR 1,013; P = 0,044), pT3a (OR 4,832; P < 0.001), and pT3b (OR 5,153; P = 0.001). Conclusions: In high-volume centres features related to host, tumour and surgeon volume are factors that predict the risk of focal and non-focal PSMs after RARP. Abbreviations: AJCC: American joint committee on cancer; AS: active surveillance; ASA: American society of anesthesiologists; BCR: biochemical recurrence; BMI: body mass index; BPC: percentage of biopsy positive cores; ePLND: extended lymph node dissection; H&E: haematoxylin and eosin; IQR, interquartile range; ISUP: international society of urologic pathology; LNI: lymph node invasion; LOS: length of hospital stay; mpMRI: multiparametric MRI; (c)(p)N: (clinical) (pathological) nodal stage; OR: odds ratio; OT: operating time; PSA-DT: PSA-doubling time; (P)SM: (positive) surgical margin; (NS)(RA)RP: (nerve-sparing) (robot-assisted) radical prostatectomy; RT: radiation therapy; (c)(p)T: (clinical) (pathological) tumour stage
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio B Porcaro
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Alessandro Tafuri
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy.,Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marco Sebben
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Paolo Corsi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Tania Processali
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Pirozzi
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nelia Amigoni
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Rizzetto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Aliasger Shakir
- Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Giovanni Cacciamani
- Catherine & Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, USC Institute of Urology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California (USC), Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Arianna Mariotto
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Brunelli
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Riccardo Bernasconi
- Department of Pathology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giovanni Novella
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Vincenzo De Marco
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Walter Artibani
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|