Management of inflammatory bowel disease during COVID-19 pandemic

COVID-19 and alcohol consumption: recommendations in the Omicron era

In the early stages of the pandemic, the first reports began that alcohol consumption could increase the risk of becoming infected and worsening the prognosis disease. This is for two reasons: behavioral and socio-economic factors that characterize a part of this population can be the cause of viral spread and a direct or indirect negative action of ethanol on the immune system. The data used for the preparation of these recommendations are based on a detailed analysis of the scientific literature published before March 31, 2022 (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar). Furthermore, in the process of developing this work, we consulted the guidelines/position papers of the Italian Society on Alcohol and of the World Health Organization. It has been confirmed that AC is in COVID-19 era a risky behavior and that AUD and substance use disorder (SUD) patients are certainly at greater risk of contracting infection and also of having a worse course. In light of what has been said, some recommendations can be made: correctly inform the general population that AC negatively interacts with COVID-19 infection; reducing the COVID-19 risk by advocating healthy lifestyle habits (smoke, diet, physical exercise, etc.) and preferential policies in population with comorbidities; implement actions that reduce the average consumption of alcohol by avoiding hazardous/harmful consumption. Abstention is better; identify alcohol consumption through a more in-depth alcohol history, using the AUDIT; AUDs patients are frail patients deserving a complete vaccination course; suggest a period of alcoholic abstention of at least thirty days before vaccination to be maintained for the following fifteen days; promoting health education campaigns for young people in order to promote vaccination culture and correct lifestyles.

The enigma of vitamin D supplementation in aging with obesity

INTRODUCTION

The American Geriatrics Society recommends a minimum daily supplement of 1,000 IU and underlines that a dosage lower than 600 IU do not prevent falls in elderly people.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The author searched on PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus database the MeSH terms and keywords of "vitamin D," "(25(OH)D)," "elderly" and "obesity." The aim of this study was to support the rationale on the correct vitamin D supplementation in elderly people with obesity and overweight.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Ten studies were found suitable for consideration in writing this comprehensive evidence-based rapid review. The supplementation of vitamin D included 1500 elderly subjects with Body Mass Index (BMI) over 25 kg/m². This article proved that the daily vitamin D supplementation from 2000 to 4000 UI is highly recommended in elderly people with obesity because of: 1) sequestration of vitamin D by the adipose tissue; 2) increased catabolism of vita-in D in the adipose tissue; 3) decreased synthesis of serum 25 hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) in the liver; 4) reduced sun-exposure; and 5) dosages equal at 1000 UI or lower that did not show any important effect on vitamin D deficiency and on related comorbidities in elderly people with obesity.

CONCLUSIONS

Gender, baseline levels of serum (25(OH)D) concentration, ethnicity and severity of BMI should be accounted for the correct supplementation of vitamin D in elderly population for the precision medicine goal.

Nonattendance to gastroenterologist follow-up after discharge is associated with a thirty-days re-admission in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a set of chronic inflammatory diseases associated with significant morbidity and high hospitalization rate. IBD patients are particularly prone to rehospitalization resulting in high medical cost and morbidity. The aim of this study was to assess laboratory and clinical predictors of readmission in patients who were hospitalized with IBD flare.

METHODS

A multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional analysis included IBD patients who were admitted with disease exacerbation from January 1, 2019 to January 1, 2020 in three Israeli university hospitals (Nazareth Hospital, Galilee Medical Center and Hadassah Medical Organization).

RESULTS

Overall, a total of 176 hospitalizations for IBD flares were included. Seventeen patients were readmitted within 30 days after discharge (group A), as compared to 159 patients who were not (group B). The average age was 35.3±19.2 years in group A vs. 38.6±16 years in group B. Eight (47.1%) and 9 (52.9%) patients had Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) in group A as compared to 102 (64.2%) and 57 (35.9%) in group B, respectively. On univariate analysis, only the attendance to gastroenterology clinic follow-up after discharge from hospitalization due to IBD flare was significantly protective factor to with 30-days readmission (OR=0.37, 95% CI: 0.13-1, P=0.05). There were no associations with the other assessed clinical and laboratory parameters and importantly IBD type (OR=1.99, 95% CI: 0.74-5.34, P=0.17). Notably, there was no effect of the day of discharge white blood counts, albumin and C reactive protein (CRP) values on readmission rates (odds ratio [OR]=1.07, 95% CI: 0.96-1.20, P=0.19, OR=0.86, 95% CI: 0.39-1.91, P=0.71 and OR=0.99, 95% CI: 0.97-1.01, P=0.59), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Attendance to out-patient gastroenterologist follow-up is the only significant protective parameter to 30-days readmission in patients with IBD. This finding highlights the vital need of adequate gastroenterological follow-up of these patients after hospital discharge. Further studies are warranted to precisely define timing and role of outpatient follow-up in reducing IBD readmissions.

COVID-19 quarantine measures are associated with negative social impacts and compromised follow-up care in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in Brazil

Background

COVID-19 has affected the entire world. We aimed to determine the impact of COVID-19 containment measures on the daily life and follow up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

Methods

During May 2020, we evaluated 179 (79.6%) patients with Crohn’s disease (CD) and 46 (20.4%) with ulcerative colitis (UC) by telephone, using a structured questionnaire to gather information on social impact and IBD follow up.

Results

Some kind of social distancing measure was reported by 95.6% of our patients, self-quarantine (64.9%) being the most frequent. Depressive mood was the most prevalent social impact (80.2%), followed by anxiety/fear of death (58.2%), insomnia (51.4%), daily activity impairment (48%), sexual dysfunction (46.2%), and productivity impairment (44%). The results were similar when we compared patients with active disease to those in remission and patients with UC to those with CD. Analysis of IBD follow up showed that 83.1% of all patients missed an IBD medical appointment, 45.5% of the patients missed laboratory tests, 41.3% missed the national flu vaccination program, 31.3% missed any radiologic exam, 17.3% missed colonoscopy, and 16.9% failed to obtain biologic therapy prescriptions. Biologics were discontinued by 28.4% of the patients. UC patients had higher rates of missed vaccination than CD patients (56.5% vs. 37.4%, P=0.02) and more failures to obtain a biologic prescription (28.3% vs. 14.0%, P=0.02).

Conclusions

Our study reveals alarming social impacts and declining follow-up care for IBD patients during the COVID-19 outbreak. These findings may have implications for disease control in the near future.

COVID-19: a user's guide, status of the art and an original proposal to terminate viral recurrence

The world is now entering its 9^th month of combat against a pandemic of deadly pneumonia. Started out from China in December 2019, the disease has been declared as caused by infection with a so far unknown RNA Coronavirus of the respiratory family, then named severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. In the absence of a vaccine, and with scientists still struggling for an effective therapy, COVID-19 (the SARS-dependent syndrome) carries up to now, a death toll of more than 590,000 (July 18,2020) undermining jobs and finance of contemporary society in all continents. Social distancing, the only measure hitherto shown to restrain virus spread, has been progressively loosened from May 2020 in some countries, leaving us in the fear of repeat attacks from the unchecked virus. We discuss the problem and propose to tentatively boost the antivirus cell machinery by using lab-made viral mimics to engage cell receptors.

Pattern of emergency department referral during the Covid-19 outbreak in Italy

BACKGROUND

The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) outbreak is putting the European National Health Systems under pressure. Interestingly, Emergency Department (ED) referrals for reasons other than Covid-19 seem to have declined steeply. In the present paper, we aimed to verify how the Covid-19 outbreak changed ED referral pattern.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients referred to the ED of a University Hospital in Northern Italy from 1st March to 13th April 2020. We compared the following data with those belonging to the same period in 2019: number of EDs accesses, rate of hospital admission, frequencies of the most common causes of ED referral, priority codes of access.

RESULTS

The number of ED referrals during the Covid-19 outbreak was markedly reduced when compared to the same period in 2019 (3059 vs. 5691;-46.3%). Conversely, the rate of hospital admission raised from 16.9% to 35.4% (p<0.0001), with a shift toward higher priority codes of ED admission. In 2020, we observed both a reduction of the number of patients referred for both traumatic (513, 16.8% vs. 1544, 27.1%; χ2=118.7, p<0.0001) and non-traumatic (4147 vs. 2546) conditions. Among the latter, suspected Covid-19 accounted for 1101 (43.2%) accesses.

CONCLUSIONS

The Covid-19 pandemic completely changed the pattern of ED referral in Italy, with a marked reduction of the accesses to the hospitals. This could be related to a limited exposure to traumas and to a common fear of being infected during EDs in-stay. This may limit the misuse of EDs for non- urgent conditions, but may also delay proper referrals for urgent conditions.