Elastography for characterization of focal liver lesions: current evidence and future perspectives

Corrected and republished from: Metabolic associated liver disease

Alcohol consumption (AC) and metabolic syndrome (MS) represent the first cause of liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation. The habit of consuming alcoholic beverages and the presence of MS and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) often coexist in the same patient. The histoclinical boundaries between alcohol related liver disease (ALD) and NAFLD are often not well defined. The co-presence of AC and MS increases the risk of hepatic and extra-hepatic disease. The terminological evolution from NAFLD to metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is certainly a useful advance. However, it is known that the appearance of liver fibrosis increases oncologic and cardiovascular disease risk, which in the case of cirrhosis can be present even in the absence of steatosis and that the mechanisms of fibrogenesis can act independently of the presence of steatosis/steatohepatitis. For this reason, as already stated recently, a further terminological evolution can be hypothesized. This article was originally published with mistakes in the text. The new corrected citable version appears below.

Metabolic associated liver disease

In real practice the patient with liver disease is often the carrier of multiple etiological factors such as metabolic syndrome (MS) and alcohol consumption (AC). Their copresence is often underestimated and AC is not adequately studied. Traditionally to diagnose non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), AC must not exceed 30 gr for men and 20 gr for women per day. This limit should still be reduced, especially in relation to the AC and fibrogenesis ratio and also frequent misestimation of AC or unrecognized MS may underestimate multi caused liver injury. AC is a contributing cause of MS and alcoholic and non-alcoholic liver disease have a substantially overlapping histopathological picture. Moreover, AC and MS are cause and contributing cause of extra-hepatic morbidity and mortality. It can be concluded that the possible simplification of terminology at metabolic associated liver disease (MALD) makes clinical activity more usable and immediate, facilitates better communication and cooperation between scientific societies and specialists who apparently deal with different medical sectors, facilitates early identification of related hepatic and extra-hepatic pathology, allows to "see the person in a unitary way," to create more streamlined care pathways, to reduce the hospitalization rate with relative cost-benefit advantage and to create unitary prevention and health promotion policies.

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and fibrosis: novel non-invasive approaches for diagnosis and risk stratification

Despite the availability of an effective vaccination, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still a major health concern worldwide. Chronic HBV infection can lead to fibrosis accumulation and overtime to cirrhosis, the principal risk factor for liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma development. Liver biopsy is still considered the gold standard for fibrosis assessment, even though it is invasive and not exempt of complications. Overtime, several non-invasive methods for the detection of liver fibrosis have been developed and gradually introduced into clinical practice. However, their main limitation is the poor performance for the detection of intermediate stages of fibrosis. Finally, novel serological biomarkers, polygenic risk scores and imaging methods have been proposed in last years as novel promising tools to correctly identify the degree of liver fibrosis and to monitor liver disease progression. In this narrative review, we provide an overview on the novel non-invasive approaches for the evaluation of liver fibrosis and risk stratification of patients with chronic hepatitis B.