A National Cancer Grid pooled procurement initiative, India

Cancer medicines: a private vice for public benefit?

Cancer medicines have become one of the most dominant global medical technologies. They generate huge profits for the biopharmaceutical industry as well as fuel the research and advocacy activities of public funders, patient organisations, clinical and scientific communities and entire federal political ecosystems. The mismatch between the price, affordability and value of many cancer medicines and global need has generated significant policy debate, yet we see little change in behaviours from any of the major actors from public research funders through to regulatory authorities. In this policy analysis we examine whether, considering the money and power inherent in this system, any rationale global consensus and policy can be achieved to deliver affordable and equitable cancer medicines that consistently deliver clinically meaningful benefit.

National Volume-Based Procurement (NVBP) exclusively for insulin: towards affordable access in China and beyond

Universal access to insulin remains a global public health challenge mainly due to its high price. After unsuccessful healthcare reforms attempting to lower insulin prices over the past several decades, the novel pooled procurement-also known as the national volume-based procurement (NVBP)was initiated exclusively for insulin in China. The NVBP exclusively for insulin represents a unique approach to conquering the challenges in the pooled procurement many low-income and middle-income countries face. In this paper, we described how the pooled procurement mechanism was implemented for insulin in China. Forty-two insulin products from 11 companies were procured, with a median price reduction of 42.08%. The procurement price ranged from US$0.35 to US$1.63 (¥2.35-¥10.97) per defined daily dose (DDD). The median procurement price per DDD was US$$0.54 (¥3.63) for human insulins and US$0.92 (¥6.18) for analogue insulin (p<0.001), respectively. A total of 32 000 medical facilities participated in the procurement, and the pooled demand for insulin was 1.61 billion daily doses, with an estimated saving of US$2.85 billion (¥19 billion) for the first year of the procurement agreement. Insulin affordability and accessibility improved substantially. This study reveals that the NVBP exclusively for insulin could effectively reduce insulin prices and improve access to this essential medicine. Even though the pooled procurement option looks efficient, its long-term impacts on the healthcare system should be closely monitored.