Diagnostic Accuracy of Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index and Fibrosis 4 Scores in Predicting Advanced Liver Fibrosis in Patients with End-stage Renal Disease and Chronic Viral Hepatitis: Experience from Pakistan

Fibrosis-4 Score Is Associated with Mortality in Hemodialysis Patients with Chronic Viral Hepatitis: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Chronic hepatitis B and C infections are major causes of morbidity and mortality in end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients on hemodialysis (HD). The Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score is a non-invasive method to evaluate chronic liver disease. However, it is unclear whether there is a connection between the FIB-4 score and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and mortality in patients on HD. This study investigates the relationship between FIB-4 scores, MACEs, and mortality in HD patients.

METHODS

A 5-year retrospective study included 198 HD patients with chronic hepatitis B and C from Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. FIB-4 scores were categorized into high (>2.071), middle (1.030~2.071), and low (<1.030) tertiles for cross-sectional analyses. MACEs and mortality were tracked longitudinally.

RESULTS

Patients with high FIB-4 scores had lower hemoglobin and albumin levels. Cox multivariate analysis showed that high FIB-4 scores (aHR: 1.589) and diabetes mellitus (aHR: 5.688) were significant factors for all-cause mortality. The optimal FIB-4 score for 5-year mortality was 2.942. FIB-4 scores were not significant for predicting 5-year MACEs.

CONCLUSIONS

High FIB-4 scores are associated with increased 5-year all-cause mortality risk in HD patients with chronic hepatitis virus infection.

The role of preoperative aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index in predicting complications following total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between preoperative aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and postoperative complications following total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

All THA for osteoarthritis patients from 2007 to 2020 within the American College of Surgeons (ACS) National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database were included in this study. Subjects were subsequently divided into cohorts based on APRI. Four groups, including normal range, some liver damage, significant fibrosis, and cirrhosis groups, were created. Comparisons between groups were made for demographics, past medical history, and rate of major and minor complications. Other outcomes included readmission, reoperation, discharge destination, mortality, periprosthetic fracture, and postoperative hip dislocation. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the role of preoperative APRI in predicting adverse outcomes. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

In total, 104,633 primary THA patients were included in this study. Of these, 103,678 (99.1%) were in the normal APRI group, 444 (0.4%) had some liver damage, 256 (0.2%) had significant fibrosis, and 253 (0.2%) had cirrhosis. When controlling for demographics and relevant past medical history, the abnormal APRI groups had a significantly higher likelihood of major complication, minor complication, intraoperative or postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion, readmission, and non-home discharge (all p < 0.05) compared to normal APRI individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal preoperative APRI is linked with an increasing number of adverse outcomes following THA for osteoarthritis for patients across the United States.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Serum markers for predicting advanced fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease

To compare the diagnostic utility of serum markers in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB).This study enrolled 118 consecutive biopsy-proven NAFLD patients with or without CHB. Fibrosis scores of each marker were compared against histological fibrosis staging. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis helped assess the accuracy of each marker.In patients with both diseases, 12.96% (7/54) had advanced fibrosis on biopsy and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) to platelet ratio index was the best performing marker for predicting advanced fibrosis. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the ROC (95% confidence interval) for AST to platelet ratio index (APRI) were 0%, 93.62%, 0%, 86.27%, and 0.676 (0.524-0.828), respectively. The markers ranked as follows from highest to lowest with respect to their accuracy: APRI; BARD; fibrosis-4; and AST to ALT ratio. In patients without CHB, fibrosis-4 was the best performing marker for predicting advanced fibrosis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and area under the ROC (95% confidence interval) for fibrosis-4 were 77.78%, 85.45%, 46.67%, 95.92%, and 0.862 (0.745-0.978), respectively.Serum markers are less reliable in predicting advanced fibrosis in NAFLD patients with CHB; APRI is the most accurate predictor of the absence of advanced fibrosis.

Investigating the Efficiency of APRI, FIB-4, AAR and AARPRI as Noninvasive Markers for Predicting Hepatic Fibrosis in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients in Bangladesh

Background and Aims:

Accurate, affordable non-invasive markers are highly needed for efficient diagnosis and management of liver fibrosis caused by chronic hepatitis B. This is the first study to investigate the diagnostic efficiency of Aspartate Transaminase to Platelet Ratio (APRI), Fibrosis Index (FIB-4), Aspartate transaminase to Alanine Transaminase Ratio (AAR) and AAR/Platelet ratio index (AARPRI) as non-invasive markers to predict hepatic fibrosis caused by Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) in Bangladesh.

Methods:

In this study, a training cohort of 1041 CHB patients were recruited, whereas 104 and 109 CHB patients of matched ages were recruited as internal and external validation cohort groups respectively. Histological and hematological data were analyzed. METAVIR scoring system was used to classify liver fibrosis stages. Area Under Receiver Operating Curve (AUROC), correlations and cutoff values for the four diagnostic markers were calculated and assessed.

Results:

92%, 81% and 84% of the patients had liver fibrosis in the training cohort, internal and external cohort groups respectively. Among the four noninvasive panels, APRI showed the best area under ROC; (0.767, CI: 0.780-0.914; 0.775) for the training cohort, (0.775, CI: 0.693-0.857), and (0.847, CI: 0.780-0.914) for the internal and external cohorts respectively. Cut-off value of APRI was 0.512 with sensitivity/specificity of 84%/67% in training cohort, 81% / 66% in the internal cohort, and 88% / 66% in an external cohort. The odds ratio for APRI was 32.95 (95%CI: 4.746-228.862,p<0.001).

Conclusion:

Among all the four tested markers, APRI is the most accurate non-invasive test to predict major liver fibrosis (F2-3) in Bangladeshi CHB patients.

Evaluating CKD/ESRD patient with hepatitis C infection: How to interpret diagnostic testing and assess liver injury

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) is the most common cause of infection related deaths in USA according to Central Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report in 2016. Hepatitis C is a blood borne virus and is common in chronic kidney disease (CKD) and in hemodialysis (HD) dependent patients. A majority of patients with CHC could remain asymptomatic and are still undiagnosed. Early detection of CHC and linkage of infected patients to care for evaluation and treatment is the standard of care as emphasized by Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) and American Association for the Study of Liver Disease- Infectious Disease Society of America (AASLD-IDSA) practice guidelines. Historically, the management of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected CKD patients, including those on dialysis and in the peri-transplant setting, was a challenge. However, the evolution of various liver assessment tools, HCV tests, therapies and treatment strategies in the recent years has catalyzed a paradigm change in this area. This review provides an update on evaluating methodology, diagnostic tests and the various assessment tools for liver fibrosis pertaining to the CKD/HD patient infected with HCV.