Nasal histamine provocation of tenants in a sick-building residential area

Upper respiratory impairment in restorers of cultural heritage

BACKGROUND

There is a paucity of data regarding respiratory health in restorers of cultural heritage or similar occupations, such as visual artists or museum workers, although they are exposed to a complex mixture of various respiratory hazards.

AIMS

To evaluate atopy and respiratory health parameters, including bronchial and nasal non-specific reactivity, in restorers and conservators of cultural heritage (restorers).

METHODS

Fifty-six restorers and 62 controls provided general data and data on ever experienced rhinitic or asthma-like symptoms, spirometry, non-specific bronchial and nasal responsiveness to histamine, skin prick testing to common inhalational allergens and serum total IgE levels.

RESULTS

Spirometry values were in the range of normal values in 55 of 56 restorers and did not differ significantly from those in control subjects. However, restorers had more than two times higher prevalence of nasal hyper-responsiveness (NHR), with 2.3 times higher risk of NHR compared to controls [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.4-3.6, P < 0.001]. The risk of NHR was slightly reduced by increasing age (odds ratio 0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99, P < 0.05). NHR was not associated with gender, smoking status, bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR), upper or lower respiratory symptoms or atopy status.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with controls, the studied group of workers occupationally exposed to respiratory hazards during restoration/conservation activities had no deterioration of lung function but had an increased non-specific nasal responsiveness that was not correlated with upper and lower respiratory symptoms, BHR or atopy. The relationship of this finding to future clinical outcome should be investigated in a longitudinal study.

Assessment of Upper Respiratory Tract and Ocular Irritative Effects of Volatile Chemicals in Humans

Accurate assessment of upper respiratory tract and ocular irritation is critical for identifying and remedying problems related to overexposure to volatile chemicals, as well as for establishing parameters of irritation useful for regulatory purposes. This article (a) describes the basic anatomy and physiology of the human upper respiratory tract and ocular mucosae, (b) discusses how airborne chemicals induce irritative sensations, and (c) reviews practical means employed for assessing such phenomena, including psychophysical (e.g., threshold and suprathreshold perceptual measures), physiological (e.g., cardiovascular responses), electrophysiological (e.g., event-related potentials), and imaging (e.g., magnetic resonance imaging) techniques. Although traditionally animal models have been used as the first step in assessing such irritation, they are not addressed here since (a) there are numerous reviews available on this topic and (b) many rodents and rabbits are obligate nose breathers whose nasal passages differ considerably from those of humans, potentially limiting generalization of animal-based data to humans. A major goal of this compendium is to inform the reader of procedures for assessing irritation in humans and to provide information of value in the continued interpretation and development of empirical databases upon which future reasoned regulatory health decisions can be made.

Nasal histamine reactivity among adolescents in a remediated moisture-damaged school--a longitudinal study

In a previous study, in the spring of 1995, we found that teachers, who had been working for several years in a moister-damaged school, 1 year after the renovation still reported a higher frequency of complaints and symptoms and showed significantly higher mucosal histamine reactivity compared with teachers in a control school, although the school seemed to be properly renovated. A longitudinal study of 90 randomly selected senior high school students entering the two schools was initiated to exclude or verify if the indoor air still exerted an irritant effect on the upper airways of an earlier unexposed group. The students went through a nasal histamine provocation test and answered a questionnaire on three occasions, in 1995, 1996 and 1997. No significant differences in the nasal histamine provocation curves for the students at the target school and those at the control school could be shown from start to endpoint of the study period. Neither was there any differences concerning perceived indoor air or mucosal symptoms between the target and the control group and technical measurements showed no noteworthy differences between the two schools. In conclusion, this study indicates that based on both technical and objective medical measures, the current indoor air in the remediated moisture-damaged school does not exert an irritant effect on the upper airway mucosa of the students. A 2-year follow-up of the teachers showed a decreased reactivity to histamine, giving further support to this statement. The increased mucosal reactivity observed among the teachers is probably a result of the previous long-term exposure to building dampness. No differences were seen between atopic and non-atopic students.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

Persistent symptoms and increased nasal mucosal reactivity among personnel in a remediated damp building does not necessary imply an inadequate renovation. A longitudinal study with registration of subjective (questionnaires) and objective (nasal histamine reactivity) data of an earlier unexposed group residing in the same building further contributes to the evaluation whether the renovation was successful or not.

Effect of indoor environmental factors on development of atopic symptoms in children followed up to 4 years of age

The increased prevalence of atopic diseases reported in many Western countries is thought to be caused by changes in living conditions. For a long time attention was focused on indoor environmental factors and early feeding patterns, but during recent years other factors have received more attention. An unselected, Swedish, population-based cohort of 904 children were followed from the age of 3 months to 4 years. Questionnaires were sent to the mothers of the children when they were 3 months, 18 months and 4 years of age. A blood sample was taken from a subgroup of the children when they were 4 years old which was analysed for IgE specific antibodies to food and inhalant allergens. The prevalences of asthma, allergic eye-nose reactions, eczema, and food reactions at 4 years of age and a positive blood test were analysed as outcome factors. Features of housing and early feeding patterns were found to have limited effect on the development of allergies in the children. Presence of older siblings resulted in a decreased tendency to produce IgE antibodies. Early exposure to furry animals seemed to prevent the development of asthma. Children who were frequently infected up to 18 months of age showed an increased prevalence of allergic symptoms at 4 years of age. Children of mothers with a higher prevalence of complaints about indoor factors, or who had increased general symptoms or skin or mucous membrane symptoms ran a greater risk of developing various allergic symptoms. However, these children did not have higher levels of IgE antibodies. The reported allergic symptoms in the children may be due to non-immunological reactions, although it is also possible that the mothers may have over-reported such symptoms.

Indoor mold, toxigenic fungi, and Stachybotrys chartarum: infectious disease perspective

Damp buildings often have a moldy smell or obvious mold growth; some molds are human pathogens. This has caused concern regarding health effects of moldy indoor environments and has resulted in many studies of moisture- and mold-damaged buildings. Recently, there have been reports of severe illness as a result of indoor mold exposure, particularly due to Stachybotrys chartarum. While many authors describe a direct relationship between fungal contamination and illness, close examination of the literature reveals a confusing picture. Here, we review the evidence regarding indoor mold exposure and mycotoxicosis, with an emphasis on S. chartarum. We also examine possible end-organ effects, including pulmonary, immunologic, neurologic, and oncologic disorders. We discuss the Cleveland infant idiopathic pulmonary hemorrhage reports in detail, since they provided important impetus for concerns about Stachybotrys. Some valid concerns exist regarding the relationship between indoor mold exposure and human disease. Review of the literature reveals certain fungus-disease associations in humans, including ergotism (Claviceps species), alimentary toxic aleukia (Fusarium), and liver disease (Aspergillys). While many papers suggest a similar relationship between Stachybotrys and human disease, the studies nearly uniformly suffer from significant methodological flaws, making their findings inconclusive. As a result, we have not found well-substantiated supportive evidence of serious illness due to Stachybotrys exposure in the contemporary environment. To address issues of indoor mold-related illness, there is an urgent need for studies using objective markers of illness, relevant animal models, proper epidemiologic techniques, and examination of confounding factors.

Nasal mucosal histamine reactivity among young students and teachers, having no or prolonged exposure to a deteriorated indoor climate

BACKGROUND

In a study performed in the spring of 1995, we found a significantly greater nasal mucosal histamine reactivity among teachers, who had worked for several years in a recently renovated moisture-damaged school, than in those in a control school. In the present study we investigated the students who begun their high-school studies at both schools in the autumn of 1995 and compared them with the teachers as regards mucosal reactivity, atopy and symptoms.

METHODS

Twenty-eight teachers in the target school, 18 teachers in the control school and 45 students from each school underwent a nasal histamine provocation test and a skin-prick test. They also answered a standardized questionnaire.

RESULTS

The teachers in both schools had more marked nasal mucosal histamine reactivity at the lowest provocation concentrations than the students. The histamine provocation curve of the target school teachers had consistently higher values than that of the students (P = 0.0001), but its slope and shape were similar (P = 0.15), while the slope of the provocation curve of the control school teachers was flatter. However, there was only a borderline significance in this respect compared to the students (P = 0.07). Teachers with a dry and crusty appearance of the nasal mucosa on anterior rhinoscopy reacted more strongly to histamine provocation than those without this finding (P = 0.0004). There was a significantly higher frequency of skin-prick test positivity (SPT+) among the students (P = 0.03). There were no significant differences in nasal mucosal histamine reactivity between atopic and non-atopic subjects out of pollen season.

CONCLUSIONS

Teachers had a significantly greater mucosal histamine reactivity than the students, whereas the latter had a significantly higher frequency of atopy. These results are compatible with an age-related pattern of mucosal reactivity. A crusty appearance of the nasal mucosa seems to predispose to an increase in histamine reactivity. There were no significant differences according to histamine reactivity between atopic and non-atopic subjects.

Slowly decreasing mucosal hyperreactivity years after working in a school with moisture problems

In our first study in 1995, teachers, who had worked in a water-damaged school for more than 5 years, were tested for nasal histamine reactivity by rhinostereometry. They were found to have significantly increased reactivity compared with teachers in a school without these indoor-climate problems. This finding could not be explained by differences in atopy or other personal characteristics. In this 2-year follow-up study (1995-97), 26 of 28 teachers in the target school and all 18 teachers in the control school, who participated in the initial study, accepted to take part. They were tested with the same histamine provocation procedure and answered the same questionnaire as 2 years earlier. Technical measurements of temperature, relative humidity, dust, carbon dioxide, formaldehyde and total volatile organic compounds (TVOC) were carried out in both schools during the time period between the two test occasions. In this provocation test, the teachers from the repaired water-damaged school still demonstrated an increased reactivity to histamine compared with the teachers in the control school, but the difference between the growth curves of the provocation tests was less than in 1995. Teachers in the target school still complained about the indoor air quality more than their colleagues, although the complaints were less common. No major differences were observed in the technical investigation between the two schools and the measurements were all within values usually seen in schools in northern countries. Our conclusion is that the observed nasal mucosal hyperreactivity among the teachers in the renovated water-damaged school seems to persist over years and only slowly decrease even after successful remedial measures have been taken.

Nasal hyperreactivity among teachers in a school with a long history of moisture problems

Upper airway symptoms have frequently been reported in people working or residing in damp buildings. However, little information has been available on objective pathophysiologic findings in relation to these environments. Twenty-eight teachers, who had worked for at least five years in a recently renovated school that had had severe moisture problems for years, were randomly selected for this study. Eighteen teachers, who had worked in another school that had no moisture problems, were randomly selected to serve as the control group. Although remedial measures had been taken, an increase in the prevalence of mucous membrane irritations was still reported by the teachers in the target school. We used a nasal challenge test with three concentrations of histamine (1, 2 and 4 mg/mL). Recordings of swelling of the nasal mucosa were made with rhinostereometry, a very accurate optical non-invasive method. The growth curves of mucosal swelling induced by the three concentrations of histamine differed significantly between the two groups (p < 0.01). The frequencies of atopy, evaluated with the skin-prick test, were almost identical in both groups. The study indicates that long-term exposure to indoor environments with moisture problems may contribute to mucosal hyperreactivity, of the upper airways. Such hyperreactivity also seems to persist for at least one year after remedial measures have been taken.

Airway reactivity and exhaled NO following swine dust exposure in healthy volunteers

Short-time exposure to swine dust causes an intense inflammation of upper and lower airways and induces increased bronchial responsiveness to methacholine in previously non-exposed healthy volunteers. The objective to this study was to investigate the nasal inflammatory response and mucosal reactivity to swine dust exposure and whether nitric oxide metabolism is involved in the inflammatory process. Nitric oxide in expired air, nasal histamine test (NH), nasal lavage (NAL) and bronchial histamine challenges were studied before and after a 3 h exposure to swine dust in a swine confinement building in 17 non-smoking healthy subjects not previously exposed to farm dust. To detect any interference between NAL and NH, the subjects were divided into two groups: in group 1, NAL was performed after NH and in group 2, NAL preceded NH. Nasal histamine response increased significantly in group 1, but not in group 2 (P=0.012). Albumin levels in NAL were higher before as well as after dust exposure in group 1 compared to group 2 (P=0.036 and 0.015 respectively). Bronchial histamine responsiveness increased following exposure (P= 0.045). Nitric oxide in expired air decreased following bronchial histamine challenge at baseline (P=0.013) but was otherwise unaltered. Short-time exposure to swine dust increases non-specific reactivity of both nose and bronchi. Nasal lavage procedure interferes with nasal histamine test when performed with connection to each other. The inflammatory reaction may involve NO metabolism.

Nasal and bronchial histamine reactivity in patients with allergic rhinitis out of season

BACKGROUND

The correlation between non-specific hyperreactivity of upper and lower airways in pathologic conditions has not been studied extensively.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the occurrence of nasal and bronchial hyperreactivity in patients with allergic rhinitis studied out-of-season.

METHODS

From patients admitted to the Allergy Unit at Stockholm Söder Hospital, 12 individuals with allergic rhinitis due to grass or birch pollen were selected. The nasal mucosa was exposed to increasing concentrations of histamine chloride and the response was recorded by rhinostereometry, an optical method that exclusively measures changes in nasal congestion. Bronchial histamine challenge was performed in connection with the nasal tests, but on different days.

RESULTS

The nasal histamine response was significantly greater than in a reference group of healthy volunteers (P < .01). Nasal hyperreactivity was demonstrated in 9 of 12 patients. No clear relation between the magnitude of nasal and bronchial histamine responses was seen in the study group.

CONCLUSIONS

In allergic rhinitis studied out-of-season, airway hyperreactivity is common in both upper and lower airways, but does not necessarily occur together in the same individual.