Role of Exhaled Nasal Nitric Oxide in Distinguishing between Chronic Rhinosinusitis with and without Nasal Polyps

Targeting Epithelium Dysfunction and Impaired Nasal Biofilms to Treat Immunological, Functional, and Structural Abnormalities of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with (CRSwNP) or without (CRSsNP) nasal polyps is a prevalent and heterogeneous disorder existing as a spectrum of clinical conditions with complex underlying pathomechanisms. CRS comprises a broad syndrome characterized by multiple immunological features involving complex interactions between the genes, the microbiome, host- and microbiota-derived exosomes, the epithelial barrier, and environmental and micromilieu exposures. The main pathophysiological feature is an epithelial barrier disruption, accompanied by microbiome alterations and unpredictable and multifactorial immunologic overreactions. Extrinsic pathogens and irritants interact with multiple epithelial receptors, which show distinct expression patterns, activate numerous signaling pathways, and lead to diverse antipathogen responses. CRSsNP is mainly characterized by fibrosis and mild inflammation and is often associated with Th1 or Th17 immunological profiles. CRSwNP appears to be associated with moderate or severe type 2 (T2) or Th2 eosinophilic inflammation. The diagnosis is based on clinical, endoscopic, and imaging findings. Possible CRS biomarkers from the peripheral blood, nasal secretions, tissue biopsies, and nasally exhaled air are studied to subgroup different CRS endotypes. The primary goal of CRS management is to maintain clinical control by nasal douching with isotonic or hypertonic saline solutions, administration of nasal and systemic steroids, antibiotics, biologic agents, or, in persistent and more severe cases, appropriate surgical procedures.

A review of current biomarkers in chronic rhinosinusitis with or without nasal polyps

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a heterogeneous disease with a variety of cellular and molecular pathophysiologic mechanisms. Biomarkers have been explored in CRS using various phenotypes, such as polyp recurrence after surgery. Recently, the presence of regiotype in CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and the introduction of biologics for the treatment of CRSwNP has indicated the importance of endotypes, and there is a need to elucidate endotype-based biomarkers.

AREAS COVERED

Biomarkers for eosinophilic CRS, nasal polyps, disease severity, and polyp recurrence have been identified. Additionally, endotypes are being identified for CRSwNP and CRS without nasal polyps using cluster analysis, an unsupervised learning technique.

EXPERT OPINION

Endotypes in CRS have still being established, and biomarkers capable of identifying endotypes of CRS are not yet clear. When identifying endotype-based biomarkers, it is necessary to first identify endotypes clarified by cluster analysis for outcomes. With the application of machine learning, the idea of predicting outcomes using a combination of multiple integrated biomarkers, rather than a single biomarker, will become mainstream.

Nasal Nitric Oxide as a Biomarker in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sinonasal Inflammatory Diseases: A Review of the Literature

OBJECTIVE

To critically review the literature on nasal nitric oxide (nNO) and its current clinical and research applicability in the diagnosis and treatment of different sinonasal inflammatory diseases, including acute bacterial rhinosinusitis (ABRS), allergic rhinitis (AR), and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS).

METHODS

A search of the PubMed database was conducted to include articles on nNO and sinonasal diseases from January 2003 to January 2020. All article titles and abstracts were reviewed to assess their relevance to nNO and ABRS, AR, or CRS. After selection of the manuscripts, full-text reviews were performed to synthesize current understandings of nNO and its applications to the various sinonasal inflammatory diseases.

RESULTS

A total of 79 relevant studies from an initial 559 articles were identified using our focused search and review criteria. nNO has been consistently shown to be decreased in ABRS and CRS, especially in cases with nasal polyps. While AR is associated with elevations in nNO, nNO levels have also been found to be lower in AR cases with higher symptom severity. The obstruction of the paranasal sinuses is speculated to be an important variable in the relationship between nNO and the sinonasal diseases. Treatment of these diseases appears to affect nNO through the reduction of inflammatory disease burden and also mitigation of sinus obstruction.

CONCLUSION

nNO has been of increasing interest to researchers and clinicians over the last decade. The most compelling data for nNO as a clinical tool involve CRS. nNO can be used as a marker of ostiomeatal complex patency. Variations in measurement techniques and technology continue to impede standardized interpretation and implementation of nNO as a biomarker for sinonasal inflammatory diseases.

Blood eosinophil count in the diagnosis of allergic-like rhinitis with chronic rhinosinusitis

BACKGROUND

Allergic rhinitis (AR) and nonallergic rhinitis (NAR) often are comorbid with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). Finding a convenient test that distinguishes these complex conditions is helpful for effective treatment. We aimed to analyse blood parameter differences between AR and NAR patients with/without CRS.

METHODS

Eight hundred thirteen patients, including AR and NAR with different conditions [CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and CRS without nasal polyps (CRSsNP)] were analysed in this retrospective study. Patients with a nasal deviation alone were included as healthy controls (HC). Receiver operating characteristic analysis was used to assess the value of blood parameters for diagnosing AR or NAR with/without CRS.

RESULTS

Compared to nonallergic-like rhinitis (HC, CRSwNP and CRSsNP), the blood eosinophil count was significantly increased in the allergic-like rhinitis groups, except for NAR-CRSsNP (AR, AR-CRSwNP, AR-CRSsNP, NAR and NAR-CRSwNP). The NAR-CRSsNP group had a higher level of eosinophils than the HC and CRSsNP groups. Among allergic-like rhinitis patients, eosinophils were higher in allergic-like rhinitis patients with CRSwNP (AR-CRSwNP and NAR-CRSwNP) than in allergic-like rhinitis patients without CRSwNP (AR, AR-CRSsNP, NAR and NAR-CRSsNP). However, no difference in blood eosinophils was observed between AR and NAR. There was also no difference among nonallergic-like rhinitis patients. Similar findings were found for the blood eosinophil proportion. Furthermore, the blood eosinophil count was a good predictor of allergic-like rhinitis, especially allergic-like rhinitis with CRSwNP.

CONCLUSION

The blood eosinophil count and proportion may be good diagnostic predictors of allergic-like rhinitis but cannot differentiate between AR and NAR. This indicator may be much better in predicting allergic-like rhinitis with CRSwNP.

The Diagnostic and Prognostic Role of Biomarkers in Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) refers to an inflammatory disease of the sinonasal mucosa, with a significant economic burden and impact on quality of life. The diagnosis of CRS is conventionally made on careful history and physical examination, including nasoendoscopic assessment which requires technical expertise. There has been increasing interest in using biomarkers in the non-invasive diagnosis and prognostication of CRS, tailored to the disease inflammatory endotype. Potential biomarkers currently being studied can be isolated from peripheral blood, exhaled nasal gases or nasal secretions, as well as sinonasal tissue. In particular, various biomarkers have revolutionized the way in which CRS is managed, revealing new inflammatory pathways where novel therapeutic drugs are employed to curb the inflammatory process, which may be different from one patient to the next. Biomarkers that have been extensively studied in CRS, such as eosinophil count, IgE, and IL-5, have been associated with a T_H2 inflammatory endotype which correlates with an eosinophilic CRSwNP phenotype that predicts a poorer prognosis, tends to recur after conventional surgical treatment, but responds to glucocorticoid treatment. Newer biomarkers that demonstrate potential, such as nasal nitric oxide, can support a diagnosis of CRS with or without nasal polyps, especially when invasive tests such as nasoendoscopy are unavailable. Other biomarkers such as periostin can be used to monitor disease course after treatment of CRS. With a personalized treatment plan, the management of CRS can be individualized, optimizing treatment efficiency and reducing adverse outcomes. As such, this review aims to compile and summarize the existing literature regarding the utility of biomarkers in CRS in terms of diagnosis and prognostication, and also makes recommendations for further studies to fill current knowledge gaps.

Biomarkers in Otorhinolaryngology

Biomarkers of otorhinolaryngologic diseases with higher insult over a person’s him/herself and overall health services are summarized in brief. In order to define, diagnose, treat and monitor any disease markers are needed. Otorhinolaryngology (ORL) is interested in special disease entities of the region besides otorhinolaryngologic involvements of the systemic diseases and unique forms of pathologies such as cholesteatoma, Meniere’s disease and otosclerosis. Neoplasia is another heading to deal with. In the following chapter, one will find an overview of molecules that have been used as a biomarker as well as the end points of the present research on the issue relevant with ORL. Day by day, new molecules are being named however, the pathways of action are rather the same. Readers will find the headings related to the most common diseases of the field, informing them about where to look for defining new strategies of understanding of each disease.

The Functional Diversity of Nitric Oxide Synthase Isoforms in Human Nose and Paranasal Sinuses: Contrasting Pathophysiological Aspects in Nasal Allergy and Chronic Rhinosinusitis

The human paranasal sinuses are the major source of intrinsic nitric oxide (NO) production in the human airway. NO plays several roles in the maintenance of physiological homeostasis and the regulation of airway inflammation through the expression of three NO synthase (NOS) isoforms. Measuring NO levels can contribute to the diagnosis and assessment of allergic rhinitis (AR) and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In symptomatic AR patients, pro-inflammatory cytokines upregulate the expression of inducible NOS (iNOS) in the inferior turbinate. Excessive amounts of NO cause oxidative damage to cellular components, leading to the deposition of cytotoxic substances. CRS phenotype and endotype classifications have provided insights into modern treatment strategies. Analyses of the production of sinus NO and its metabolites revealed pathobiological diversity that can be exploited for useful biomarkers. Measuring nasal NO based on different NOS activities is a potent tool for specific interventions targeting molecular pathways underlying CRS endotype-specific inflammation. We provide a comprehensive review of the functional diversity of NOS isoforms in the human sinonasal system in relation to these two major nasal disorders' pathologies. The regulatory mechanisms of NOS expression associated with the substrate bioavailability indicate the involvement of both type 1 and type 2 immune responses.

[Management strategies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adults]

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is one of the categories of chronic rhinosinusitis and is defined by the presence of bilateral polyps. It is frequently associated with other conditions (asthma, atopy, aspirin intolerance), which worsen its prognosis.

STATE OF ART

The pathophysiology of CRSwNP is still poorly understood. The genesis of polyps is thought to be based on an initial epithelial lesion caused by environmental factors in the context of self-maintained chronic local inflammation. Multiple local and general factors can be involved in this inflammation, which is mainly of Th2 type in Europe. Abnormalities of the epithelial barrier and the immune system (eosinophilia, cytokines, T and B lymphocytes), genetic factors and pathogens, including Staphylococcus aureus, have been incriminated. The treatment of CRSwNP is mainly based on the application of local corticosteroids. Surgery remains an important part of patient management where CRSwNP becomes resistant to topical therapy. The management of CRSwNP may be at a turning point thanks to the arrival of biological therapies (anti-IgE, anti-IL-5, anti-IL-4/IL-13) the initial results of which are promising.

PERSPECTIVES/CONCLUSIONS

With the new concept of endotypes, current avenues of research are moving towards a better understanding of the inflammatory mechanisms of CRSwNP. Immunotherapy appears to be a promising future for the treatment of CRSwNP.

Nasal Nitric Oxide Measurement in Primary Ciliary Dyskinesia. A Technical Paper on Standardized Testing Protocols

Nasal nitric oxide concentrations are extremely low in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), and measurement of this nasal gas is recommended as a PCD diagnostic test in cooperative patients aged 5 years and older. However, nasal nitric oxide measurements must be performed with chemiluminescence analyzers using a standardized protocol to ensure proper results, because nasal nitric oxide values can be influenced by various internal and external factors. Repeat nasal nitric oxide testing on separate visits is required to ensure that low diagnostic values are persistent and consistent with PCD. This technical paper presents the standard operating procedures for nasal nitric oxide measurement used by the PCD Foundation Clinical and Research Centers Network at various specialty centers across North America. Adherence to this document ensures reliable nasal nitric oxide testing and high diagnostic accuracy when employed in a population with appropriate clinical phenotypes for PCD.

An Overview of the Application of Systems Biology in an Understanding of Chronic Rhinosinusitis (CRS) Development

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammatory disease of the paranasal sinuses. It is defined as the presence of a minimum of two out of four main symptoms such as hyposmia, facial pain, nasal blockage, and discharge, which last for 8–12 weeks. CRS significantly impairs a patient’s quality of life. It needs special treatment mainly focusing on preventing local infection/inflammation with corticosteroid sprays or improving sinus drainage using nasal saline irrigation. When other treatments fail, endoscopic sinus surgery is considered an effective option. According to the state-of-the-art knowledge of CRS, there is more evidence suggesting that it is more of an inflammatory disease than an infectious one. This condition is also treated as a multifactorial inflammatory disorder as it may be triggered by various factors, such as bacterial or fungal infections, airborne irritants, defects in innate immunity, or the presence of concomitant diseases. Due to the incomplete understanding of the pathological processes of CRS, there is a continuous search for new indicators that are directly related to the pathogenesis of this disease—e.g., in the field of systems biology. The studies adopting systems biology search for possible factors responsible for the disease at genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and metabolomic levels. The analyses of the changes in the genome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome may reveal the dysfunctional pathways of inflammatory regulation and provide a clear insight into the pathogenesis of this disease. Therefore, in the present paper, we have summarized the state-of-the-art knowledge of the application of systems biology in the pathology and development of CRS.

Extended nitric oxide analysis in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, with or without associated asthma

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a complex inflammatory disease highly impacting patient's quality of life, and associated with lower airway inflammation often evolving into asthma. Exhaled nitric oxide (FE_NO) is a non-invasive tool to assess Type 2 airway inflammation and its extended analysis allows to differentiate between alveolar concentration (CalvNO) and bronchial output (JawNO). It is also possible to assess the sino-nasal production of nitric oxide (nNO). We studied extended nitric oxide production in patients with CRSwNP with or without associated asthma. Consecutive adult patients with CRSwNP, with or without asthma, and 15 healthy controls were enrolled. Exclusion criteria were: smoking, uncontrolled asthma, recent upper or lower airway infections and oral corticosteroid therapy in the 4 weeks preceding clinical evaluation. Patients' demographic and clinical data were collected; patients underwent pulmonary function tests and extended nitric oxide analysis including nasal nNO assessment. A total of 125 subjects were enrolled (15 healthy controls; 69 with CRSwNP and asthma, and 41 with CRSwNP only). FE_NO, JawNO and CalvNO values were higher, while nNO was lower, in all patients with CRSwNP compared to healthy controls; no difference was found in CalvNO between patients with concomitant asthma and non-asthmatic subjects; in asthmatic patients, FE_NO and JawNO were significantly higher, while nNO values was lower, compared to patients with CRSwNP only. These results suggest that CRSwNP could be the first manifestation of a more complex systemic inflammatory pathology driven by Type 2 inflammation. An 'inflammatory gradient' hypothesis could describe a pattern of inflammation in CRSwNP patients that starts distally in the alveoli. Finally, our study indirectly reinforces the concept that novel biological drugs could become valid therapeutic options for nasal polyposis.

Systematic literature review of the epidemiology and clinical burden of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) to determine the epidemiology and clinical burden of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) and to describe how the addition of biologics has affected outcomes for patients with CRSwNP.

METHODS

The SLR adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Embase, MEDLINE, and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews databases were searched using OVID. Relevant studies published between 1 January 2008 and 8 February 2019, for epidemiology, and 1 January 2008 and 16 February 2019, for clinical burden, and relevant conference abstracts from 1 January 2017 to 7 March 2019, for epidemiology and 1 January 2017-16 February 2019 for clinical burden were included.

RESULTS

For the epidemiology and clinical burden SLR, 147 and 119 records, respectively, met the inclusion criteria. We found the prevalence of CRSwNP was 1-2.6% and was greater in men. Asthma, allergy, and allergic rhinitis were the most common comorbidities identified. Reported risk factors included asthma, gene polymorphisms, age, and eosinophilia. Studies indicated that dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab each improved different clinical outcomes. Non-biologics (drugs such as corticosteroids or antibiotics, surgery, or aspirin desensitization) improved clinical outcomes as well.

CONCLUSIONS

CRSwNP is fairly prevalent in the general population. Despite the significant efficacy of existing treatments, several unmet needs remain. The high burden of uncontrolled symptoms, frequent recurrence of nasal polyps after surgery, and long-term adverse effects of oral corticosteroids indicate that new therapies addressing these unmet needs should be developed. Although data on biologics from randomized controlled trials look promising, the efficacy of biologics in the real world has yet to be established. The SLR of the epidemiology and clinical burden of CRSwNP revealed key gaps in the literature. There was a paucity of prevalence data across many geographic areas, and no prevalence projections could be determined. Studies showed varying efficacy of non-biologics and no studies directly compared biologics for efficacy. Data regarding clinical efficacy of agents for eosinophilic CRSwNP or severe CRSwNP were lacking, and these patient populations would be served by more trials.

Nasal nitric oxide in relation to asthma characteristics in a longitudinal asthma cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Cross-sectional studies report relations between low nasal nitric oxide (nNO) and poor asthma control and between low nNO and chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). In our cohort study, we studied if changes in nNO related to changes in asthma control, symptoms of CRS, or asthma or rhinitis medication.

METHODS

A total of 196 subjects with predominantly mild to moderate asthma, aged 10-35 years, performed nNO measurements at both baseline and follow-up after a median of 43 (range 23-65) months. Asthma control, CRS symptoms, and medication, were questionnaire-assessed at both timepoints. IgE sensitisation against aeroallergens was quantified at baseline.

RESULTS

There was an increase in nNO between baseline and follow-up (764 ± 269 ppb vs. 855 ± 288 ppb, p < 0.001). When adjusted for covariates, a larger increase in nNO was found in subjects sensitised to perennial aeroallergens than those not sensitised (92 (16-167) ppb), as well as in subjects with daily use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) at baseline but not at follow-up than those on ICS daily at both timepoints (146 (51-242) ppb). In the same model, subjects using nasal steroids daily at both timepoints had decreased nNO compared with those without such treatment at both timepoints (-185 (-321-(-48)) ppb). No relations between changes in nNO levels and changes in asthma control or symptoms of CRS were found.

CONCLUSION

Longitudinal changes in nNO were not related to changes in asthma control, but were related to changes in asthma or rhinitis medication.

The roles of nasal nitric oxide in diagnosis and endotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Background

Chronic rhinosinusitis with polyps (CRSwNP) is a global health concern. Nasal nitric oxide (nNO), a clinical biomarker, have been studied to assess the presence of airway mucosal inflammation. This study aimed to clarify the roles of nNO in diagnosis and endotypes of CRSwNP.

Methods

Eighty-two CRSwNP patients and thirty healthy volunteers were recruited for this study. The patients were classified into eosinophilic CRSwNP (Eos CRSwNP) and non⁃eosinophilic CRSwNP (Non-Eos CRSwNP) endotypes by tissue eosinophil percentage. nNO levels were measured with an electrochemical sensor-based device. nNO levels and clinical factors were compared among the groups. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve and logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive ability of the nNO for diagnosis and endotypes of CRSwNP.

Results

Eos CRSwNP patients(143.9 ± 106.2, ppb) had lower nNO levels than Non-Eos CRSwNP(228.3 ± 109.2, ppb, p = 0.013) and healthy subjects(366.5 ± 88, ppb, p < 0.0001). Patients with atopy exhibited significantly higher levers of nNO compared with patients without atopy (p < 0.05). For Eos CRSwNP diagnosis, nNO had high predictive value for Eos CRSwNP (AUC: 0.939; sensitivity: 76.74%; specificity: 96.67%; cut-off value: 231 ppb, p < 0.001). Furthermore, nNO levels were associated with CRSwNP endotypes (odds ratio: 1.010; 95% confidence interval: 1.003, 1.016%; p = 0.002). When the nNO concentration was 158 ppb, we could discriminate Eos CRSwNP from Non-Eos CRSwNP (AUC = 0.710, sensitivity: 76.92%; specificity, 60.47%, P = 0.001). After it was combinated by nNO, peripheral blood eosinophil count (PEAC) and VAS score, the AUC was increased to 0.894 (95%CI = 0.807 to 0.951, p < 0.0001, sensitivity:76.74%, specificity: 89.74%).

Conclusions

nNO may have potential for non-invasive diagnosis and endotype of CRSwNP. nNO combined with PEAC and VAS score may be a good diagnostic tool for endotyps of Eos CRSwNP. However, the atopic status of the patients influenced the levels of nNO.

A Precision Medicine Approach to Rhinitis Evaluation and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Precision medicine (PM) represents a new paradigm in disease diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. The PM approach focuses on the characterization of different phenotypes and pathogenic pathways in order to allow the selection of specific biomarkers that will be useful in disease management. Rhinitis is a highly prevalent and heterogeneous disease, both in terms of underlying endotypes and clinical presentations. Therefore, to apply the PM principles to the various rhinitis subtypes rise as a meaningful strategy to improve evaluation and treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

The technology of recombinant allergens has allowed molecular characterization of IgE reactivity of specific individual components of allergenic extracts. Recently published and ongoing clinical trials based on component resolved diagnosis (CRD) bring more precision to allergen immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Monoclonal antibodies against various cytokines involved in inflammatory allergic and nonallergic rhinitis endotypes show promissory results.

SUMMARY

Better understanding of pathogenic pathways together with an accurate phenotype classification of patients presented with rhinitis symptoms contributes to point out clinical usefulness of biomarkers and other diagnostic tools, which leads to more accurate environmental control measures, personalized pharmacologic options, and new biological therapy developments.

Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FENO) in the management of asthma: a position paper of the Italian Respiratory Society (SIP/IRS) and Italian Society of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology (SIAAIC)

Asthma prevalence in Italy is on the rise and is estimated to be over 6% of the general population. The diagnosis of asthma can be challenging and elusive, especially in children and the last two decades has brought evidences that asthma is not a single disease but consists of various phenotypes. Symptoms can be underestimated by the patient or underreported to the clinician and physical signs can be scanty. Usual objective measures, like spirometry, are necessary but sometimes not significant. Despite proper treatment, asthma can be a very severe condition (even leading to death), however new drugs have recently become available which can be very effective in its control. Since asthma is currently thought to be caused by inflammation, a direct measure of the latter can be of paramount importance. For this purpose, the measurement of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide (FE_NO) has been used since the early years of the current century as a non-invasive, easy-to-assess tool useful for diagnosing and managing asthma. This SIP-IRS/SIAAIC Position Paper is a narrative review which summarizes the evidence behind the usefulness of FE_NO in the diagnosis, management and phenotypization of asthma.

Nasal Nitric Oxide in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with or without Nasal Polyps: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Background and Aims: There has been a recent growing interest in the role of nasal nitric oxide (nNO) as a biomarker for osteomeatal complex obstruction in paranasal sinus diseases. By using meta-analysis, we systematically reviewed the literature to establish the possible link between nNO concentration and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) or without (CRSsNP). Methods: We systematically searched the EMBASE, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for related studies. Differences between controls and cases were reported as standardized mean difference (SMD), with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI), using the random-effects method. Results: We selected 23 articles for the final analysis: 15 with data on 461 CRSwNP patients and 384 healthy controls, 10 with data on 183 CRSsNP patients and 260 controls, and 14 studies on 372 CRSwNP and 297 CRSsNP patients. CRSwNP patients showed significantly lower nNO values when compared to both healthy controls (SMD: −1.495; 95% CI: −2.135, −0.854; p < 0.0001) and CRSsNP patients (SMD: −1.448; 95% CI: −2.046, −0.850; p < 0.0001). Sensitivity and subgroup analyses confirmed the results, which were further refined by regression models. They showed that an increasing aspiration flow is related to a greater difference in nNO levels between cases and control subjects. We also documented lower nNO levels in CRSsNP patients with respect to controls (SMD: −0.696; 95% CI: −1.189, −0.202; p = 0.006), being this result no longer significant when excluding patients in therapy with intranasal corticosteroids. As shown by regression models, the increased Lund–Mackay score indicates a high effect size. Conclusions: nNO levels are significantly lower in CRSwNP, especially when using higher aspiration flows. Additional studies are needed to define one single standardized method and normal reference values for nNO.

Measurement of nitric oxide and assessment of airway diseases in children: an update

INTRODUCTION

Nitric oxide (NO) is a gas synthesized by the inducible NO synthase enzyme in airway cells and it is thought to make important functions in the airway inflammation of several respiratory diseases.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This current study is a review of the literature from 1990 to present about NO and its use in clinical practice. The databases used were PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

At the respiratory level there are three different measurements sites of NO: nNO (nasal nitric oxide), FeNO (exhaled fraction of nitric oxide), CaNO (alveolar nitric oxide). Each of them is produced at different levels of the respiratory tract and is involved in various diseases. nNO finds its use, principally, in the allergic rhinitis in fact it can be used as a measure of therapeutic efficacy, but not for the evaluation of the severity; also in primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD), where high levels exclude the disease, and in chronic rhinosinusitis, but it is not currently used as a diagnostic or prognostic marker. FeNO has a greatest use in bronchial asthma, particularly, it is considered a non-invasive biomarker to identify and to monitor airway inflammation but currently, there is not a consensus on the use of the FeNO in the management of asthma treatment. Finally, CaNO is the least used in clinical practice, because lack of standardization of measurement techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Nitric oxide is a sensitive indicator of the presence of airway inflammation and ciliary dysfunction, although some studies have shown varying or conflicting results.

Nasal nitric oxide is a useful biomarker for acute unilateral maxillary sinusitis in pediatric allergic rhinitis: A prospective observational cohort study

Background

Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) could be a biomarker for nasal passage inflammation and sinus ostial patency. We have aimed to investigate the nNO concentration and the effect of antibiotic therapy in children with perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) children with/without acute bacterial sinusitis.

Methods

We enrolled a cohort of 90 and 31 children with PAR, without and with acute unilateral maxillary sinusitis, and 79 normal children. Acute bacterial maxillary sinusitis was diagnosed based on clinical signs and symptoms, radiographic examination and nasal fibroendoscopy. Rhinitis control assessment test (RCAT), rhinomanometry, nNO and fractional exhaled NO (FENO) measurements were performed before and 2 weeks after antibiotic therapy.

Results

We found significantly higher mean nNO levels, FENO values, and total nasal resistance in children with PAR than in normal children (p ​< ​0.05). Acute unilateral maxillary sinusitis was associated with lower lesion-side nNO levels, higher FENO values, total nasal resistance, and poor RCAT scores (p ​< ​0.05). In multivariate analysis, age, IgE, and acute maxillary sinusitis were significant factors influencing nNO levels in children with PAR. The lesion-side nNO levels, FENO values, total nasal resistance, and RCAT scores were reversed after antibiotic therapy (p ​< ​0.05). The lesion-side nNO levels were significantly correlated to nasal obstructive scores (r ​= ​0.59, p ​< ​0.05) and expiratory nasal resistance (r ​= ​-0.54, p ​< ​0.05) in the acute maxillary sinusitis. A cut-off nNO value of 538 ​ppb showed 100% sensitivity and 94.9% specificity, to predict PAR from normal children. An nNO value of 462 ​ppb showed 100% sensitivity and 100% specificity to discriminate between the lesion-side and the unaffected sinus-side in PAR children with acute unilateral maxillary sinusitis.

Conclusions

We conclude that the obstruction of NO from the sinus into the nasal passage is the likely explanation for the decreased lesion-side nNO levels in acute unilateral maxillary sinusitis. nNO is a non-invasive biomarker with high sensitivity to diagnose and monitor treatment responses of PAR patients with acute rhinosinusitis. Both nNO and FENO levels return to baseline following antibiotic therapy, supporting the "one airway one disease" concept.

Predictive and Diagnostic Value of Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Background

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) participates in the local defense of the upper respiratory tract. Abnormal FeNO level is directly related to the occurrence of nasal diseases. However, the clinical value of FeNO in the upper airway is limited, which greatly impedes the diagnosis and treatment of nasal diseases. Here, we assessed the level of FeNO and evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of FeNO for chronic rhinosinusitis.

Material/Methods

We enrolled 35 patients with confirmed nasal inflammation and 30 healthy subjects from December 2016 and June 2017. The FeNO level was measured using a fractional exhaled nitric oxide detector. The level of FeNO in patients with different clinicopathological factors was compared. The diagnostic potential of FeNO for chronic rhinosinusitis was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results

FeNO level was significantly lower in patients with nasal inflammation than in healthy subjects (P<0.05). For nasal inflammation diagnosis, FeNO had the highest area under the curve (AUC) at 0.760, with a sensitivity of 93.30% and a specificity of 68.60%. FeNO level was significantly downregulated in chronic rhinosinusitis patients relative to chronic rhinitis patients (P<0.05). FeNO had a good ability to discriminate between chronic rhinosinusitis patients and chronic rhinitis patients, with higher AUC, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.760, 93.30%, and 68.60%, respectively. However, FeNO levels were not significantly different between different histological types of chronic rhinosinusitis (P>0.05).

Conclusions

Our results show that FeNO is a useful marker for discriminating chronic rhinosinusitis, and has potential to provide valuable information in the early diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis.

Nasal Nitric Oxide Is Correlated With Nasal Patency and Nasal Symptoms

PURPOSE

Nitric oxide (NO) is an important endogenous mediator in both upper and lower respiratory systems. The purpose of the present study was to extract nasal NO (nNO) normal range of Chinese adults and the internal influencing factors. The differences in nNO levels between rhinitis and asymptomatic atopic subjects, and the diagnostic value of nNO in allergic rhinitis (AR) were further investigated.

METHODS

One thousand adults were recruited from the general public. Participants were divided into different subgroups according to the questionnaires and skin prick tests. In all of these subjects, nNO, fractional exhaled NO (FeNO) and nasal airflow resistance were measured. The normal ranges of nNO and FeNO, the differences between subgroups, and the correlations between NO (nNO and FeNO) and other internal factors were analyzed.

RESULTS

Both nNO and FeNO levels were significantly higher in AR patients than in healthy and asymptomatic atopic subjects. The nNO levels were significantly lower in asymptomatic atopic subjects than in normal adults. FeNO levels were significantly higher in non-AR patients than in the healthy and asymptomatic atopic adults. The cutoff value of nNO for the diagnosis of AR was 117.5 ppb (sensitivity, 50.9%; specificity, 63.9%). The nNO levels were correlated with FeNO levels, total nasal resistance measured at 75Pa, nasal volume within 0-7 cm from the anterior nares (V_0-7cm) and nasal symptom visual analogue scale (VAS) scores, while the FeNO levels were correlated with age, height, weight, body surface area, nasal volume of V_0-7cm and the nasal symptom VAS score.

CONCLUSIONS

The nNO level can be significantly different between healthy and AR patients and may be significantly correlated with nasal symptoms and nasal patency of rhinitis patients. However, the clinical value of nNO is still in the exploration stage.

Exhaled and nasal nitric oxide measurement in the evaluation of chronic cough

Chronic cough is one of the most common and troublesome nonspecific respiratory symptom for which patients seek a general practitioner and specialist advice. It is conventionally defined as a cough lasting for more than 8 weeks. Exhaled nitric oxide has proven to be a specific biomarker capable to discriminate between differential diagnoses of chronic cough and simultaneously provide information about the response to specific treatment. In this review, we will discuss the potential use of exhaled and nasal nitric oxide in the diagnosis of chronic chough.

Recent advances in the diagnosis of allergic rhinitis

INTRODUCTION

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a disorder with high prevalence worldwide. Identification of clinically relevant allergens is the key step for the diagnosis, allergen avoidance and allergen specific immunotherapy for AR. Areas covered: With the new findings of mechanisms of AR and the development of technology, much progress has been achieved in the diagnosis of AR recently. We review the recent advances about local IgE, in vivo and in vitro tests, cytological diagnosis and nitric oxide (NO) in the diagnosis of AR. Expert commentary: AR is traditionally diagnosed with the combined evaluation of history and allergen sensitization by in vivo skin prick tests and in vitro allergen specific IgE in serum, to confirm the correlation between clinical history and potential allergens. Nasal provocation test and local IgE measurement can be used to diagnose local AR. Allergen microarray has the ability to detect more potential allergens. Basophil activation and mast cell activation tests can be used in allergen diagnosis and to modify the response to immunotherapy, while cytological diagnosis is useful in the differential diagnosis of AR and non-AR. Nasal NO has been confirmed to be an optimal biomarker to discriminate between AR and non-AR.

Correlation of Exhaled Nasal Nitric Oxide With Sinus Computed Tomography and Sinonasal Outcome Test Scores: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) of the paranasal sinuses is the diagnostic reference standard for chronic rhinosinusitis and related inflammatory sinus pathology. Nasal nitric oxide (nNO) levels have been investigated as a diagnostic tool in sinus disease because it decreases with sinus obstruction.

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of the study was to determine the correlation of passive (baseline) and dynamic (humming) nNO to CT findings of sinus inflammation and to sinonasal symptoms measured by the modified Sinonasal Outcome Test (26 items) (SNOT-26).

METHODS

From June 2015 through January 2016, subjects had baseline and humming nNO levels measured with a chemiluminescence NO analyzer, and each subject underwent CT imaging and completed the SNOT-26 survey. CT images were scored using the Lund-Mackay (LM) system (LM scores >3 indicated sinus inflammation). Correlation was measured by linear and ordinal regression analysis that compared SNOT-26 scores, LM scores, and nNO measurements.

RESULTS

Fourteen subjects were recruited. LM scores had a positive pairwise correlation with total SNOT-26 scores ( R² = .1457; correlation = .3817) and nasal-specific SNOT-26 scores ( R² = .4036; correlation = .6353). Baseline nasal nNO scores had a negative pairwise correlation with LM scores ( R² = .1580; correlation = -.3582), total SNOT-26 scores ( R² = .1515; correlation = -.3893), and nasal-specific SNOT-26 scores ( R² = .0805; correlation = -.4343). Although baseline nNO levels correlated with LM and SNOT-26 scores, humming nNO levels did not show a similar correlation.

CONCLUSION

Baseline passive nNO may be a useful and inexpensive point-of-care screening test for sinonasal opacification.

Biomarkers in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a complex disease that exists along the inflammatory spectrum between types 1 and 2 inflammation. The classic phenotypic differentiation of chronic rhinosinusitis based on the presence or absence of inflammatory polyps remains one of the best differentiators of response to therapy. Development of biologics for the treatment of atopic disease and asthma and topical therapies for sinusitis have placed renewed emphasis on understanding the pathophysiology of polyp disease. Identification of key markers of polyposis will allow for better stratification of inflammatory polyp disease endotypes to objectively identify medical therapies and track response to treatment.