Pulsatile lavage for the enhancement of pressure ulcer healing: a randomized controlled trial

Bacterial Contamination Control with Sodium Hypochlorite and Jet Lavage Irrigation in a Severe Stage 4 Pelvic Pressure Injury: A Case Report

ABSTRACT

This case report reviews the effect of combining a 250-cc bottle of standard antimicrobial, buffered sodium hypochlorite with a surgical method, low-pressure jet lavage irrigation in the outpatient setting to control difficult wound contamination. A 73-year-old man had been in treatment for over 8 years, undergoing at least 18 surgical wound debridement procedures for an extensive undermined pelvic pressure injury involving the sacrum, ischium, and greater trochanter. Cultures and polymerase chain reaction diagnostics revealed a multibacterial presence. Autofluorescent imaging (AFI) was used in 21 examinations performed after a 72-hour delay over a long weekend. The AFI contamination exceeded log 4 colony-forming units/g of tissue in all pretreatment examinations and was reduced to less than log 2 colony-forming units in 6 of 21 examinations, with the remaining 15 showing an estimated 80% or higher removal of the bacterial porphyrin "red" appearance. A total of 54 AFI examinations were performed using the combination treatment, and no adverse reactions were encountered. Treatment paradigms can be improved with a multifactorial approach.

Jet Lavage Irrigation Resolves Stage 4 Pelvic Pressure Injury Undermining

OBJECTIVE

Patients with stage 4 pelvic pressure injuries that have large, undermined cavities are at high risk for treatment failure and often fall into the category of palliative care. This case series identified five cases where treatment had stalled, and surgical reconstructive options were limited. Jet lavage irrigation in the outpatient setting was assessed as a treatment alternative.

METHODS

From an investigational review board study assessing the use of low-pressure jet lavage irrigation in the outpatient setting for chronic wounds, five patients were identified where the wound dimension increased at least 50% resulting from undermined cavities. All were considered high risk with Charlson Comorbidity Index scores of 5 or greater, and their wound healing had stalled with extended treatments of topicals and medicated dressings. A team of physical therapists irrigated these patients' wounds at the bedside with 3 L of saline 3 to 5 days per week using a special long irrigation tip to reach the depth of the undermined cavity. Digital planimetry was used to assess healing with wound size as the outcome.

RESULTS

Reduction of the undermined cavities was seen early within the first 3 weeks. No patient developed wound sepsis, and bacterial contamination was determined by use of autofluorescence digital imaging. Undermining resolution occurred in four patients, and one patient with an improving wound died of COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

This simple method offered clear benefits in each patient, but only one patient survived to complete wound healing. Patient and family satisfaction were high regarding the treatment, which created a painless, odor-free wound.

Wound irrigation versus swabbing technique for cleansing noninfected chronic wounds: A systematic review of differences in bleeding, pain, infection, exudate, and necrotic tissue

PURPOSE

To systematically summarize and review the existing literature to determine the difference between wound cleansing techniques, irrigation and swabbing, in relation to bleeding, pain, infection, necrotic tissue and exudate in non-infected chronic wounds including pressure injuries, venous and arterial leg ulcers and diabetic foot ulcers.

METHODS

A systematic search of the electronic databases Ovid Medline, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and EMBASE was performed to identify all relevant literature in English. The search also included systematic reviews as a method to obtain additional potential citations by manually searching the reference lists. Included studies were assessed for methodological quality using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool.

RESULTS

One study met eligibility criteria. Two hundred fifty six patients with wounds healing via secondary intention (n = 256) were included. Wound cleansing via swabbing technique was associated with increased perception of pain and increased rates of infection when compared to the irrigation group (93.4% versus 84.2% p = 0.02 and 5.2% versus 3.3% p = 0.44, respectively). Only a small proportion of this sample met the inclusion criteria, so the results are not considered externally valid.

CONCLUSION

Wound cleansing remains a controversial topic. Despite calls for further research, there continues to remain a large gap in evidence to guide practice. Irrigation continues to replace swabbing in the management of chronic wounds, although evidence of improved outcomes is virtually nonexistent. Although the one study identified was of sound methodological quality, chronic wounds accounted for only a small percentage of the sample. Therefore, results are not generalizable to those with chronic wounds. Further research is needed to determine the effectiveness of basic wound cleansing techniques before considering more costly products.

A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines for management of four common complications after spinal cord injury

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Complications such as pressure sores, pulmonary infection, urinary tract infection (UTI), and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are common after spinal cord injury (SCI). These have serious consequences for patients' physical, social, and vocational well-being. Several authoritative organizations have developed guidelines for managing these complications after SCI.

PURPOSE

We aim to systematically review and appraise guidelines on the management of four common complications (pressure sores, pulmonary infection, UTI, and VTE) after SCI as well as to summarize relevant recommendations and assess the quality of their supporting evidence.

DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

We searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science, as well as guideline-specific databases (e.g., National Guideline Clearinghouse) and Google Scholar, from January 2000 to January 2022. We included the most updated guidelines developed by specific authoritative organizations. We evaluated the included guidelines using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation 2nd edition instrument, which measures six domains (e.g., applicability). Recommendations extracted from guidelines were categorized as for, against, or neither for nor against. An evidence assessment was adopted to classify the quality of supporting evidence as poor, fair, or good.

RESULTS

Eleven guidelines from 2005 to 2020 were included, all of which, among the six domains, scored lowest in the domain of applicability. For pressure sores, guidelines recommended for skin inspection, repositioning, and the use of pressure reduction equipment as preventive measures and dressings, debridement, and surgery as treatment measures. For pulmonary infection, guidelines recommended for physical (e.g., the use of an insufflation-exsufflation device) and pharmacological measures (e.g., the use of bronchodilators). For UTI, guidelines recommended for antibiotics as a treatment measure but recommended against cranberries, methenamine salts, and acidification or alkalinization agents as preventive measures. For VTE prophylaxis, five guidelines recommended for low molecular weight heparin (LMWH). Three guidelines recommended against unfractionated heparin, whereas one guideline recommended for it. Most of the supporting evidence was of poor quality (130/139), and the rest was of fair quality (9/139).

CONCLUSIONS

For pressure sores, pulmonary infection, and UTI, evidence of poor to fair quality indicated consistent recommendations for prevention and treatment measures. For VTE, LMWH was consistently recommended, whereas recommendations on the use of unfractionated heparin were controversial.

[Guidelines for neonatal skin management in the neonatal intensive care unit (2021)]

Neonates are easily suffering from local or systematic infections due to their vulnerable skin barrier function, which leads to the increasing risk of death. Therefore, it is important to protect neonatal skin integrity and prevent neonatal skin injury in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) and current evidence, the guidelines for neonatal skin management in the NICU were developed to provide recommendations on routine skin care and prevention and treatment of iatrogenic skin injury of neonates for health care providers.

Reactive Oxygen Species and Pressure Ulcer Formation after Traumatic Injury to Spinal Cord and Brain

Traumatic injuries to the nervous system, including the brain and spinal cord, lead to neurological dysfunction depending upon the severity of the injury. Due to the loss of motor (immobility) and sensory function (lack of sensation), spinal cord injury (SCI) and brain injury (TBI) patients may be bed-ridden and immobile for a very long-time. These conditions lead to secondary complications such as bladder/bowel dysfunction, the formation of pressure ulcers (PUs), bacterial infections, etc. PUs are chronic wounds that fail to heal or heal very slowly, may require multiple treatment modalities, and pose a risk to develop further complications, such as sepsis and amputation. This review discusses the role of oxidative stress and reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the formation of PUs in patients with TBI and SCI. Decades of research suggest that ROS may be key players in mediating the formation of PUs. ROS levels are increased due to the accumulation of activated macrophages and neutrophils. Excessive ROS production from these cells overwhelms intrinsic antioxidant mechanisms. While short-term and moderate increases in ROS regulate signal transduction of various bioactive molecules; long-term and excessively elevated ROS can cause secondary tissue damage and further debilitating complications. This review discusses the role of ROS in PU development after SCI and TBI. We also review the completed and ongoing clinical trials in the management of PUs after SCI and TBI using different technologies and treatments, including antioxidants.

Wound, pressure ulcer and burn guidelines - 1: Guidelines for wounds in general, second edition

The Japanese Dermatological Association prepared the clinical guidelines for the "Wound, pressure ulcer and burn guidelines", second edition, focusing on treatments. Among them, "Guidelines for wounds in general" is intended to provide the knowledge necessary to heal wounds, without focusing on particular disorders. It informs the basic principles of wound treatment, before explanations are provided in individual chapters of the guidelines. We updated all sections by collecting references published since the publication of the first edition. In particular, we included new wound dressings and topical medications. Additionally, we added "Question 6: How should wound-related pain be considered, and what should be done to control it?" as a new section addressing wound pain, which was not included in the first edition.

Optimizing Technology Use for Chronic Lower-Extremity Wound Healing

Innovations in technology are used in managing chronic wounds. Despite the wide range of technologies available, healing of chronic wounds remains variable. In this paper, the authors offer an evidence based approach to the use of technology for diagnosis and management based on the concept of standardised care.

Plan de Atención Integral de Enfermería para el Cuidado de Personas con Úlceras por Presión

<p class="normal"><strong>Antecedentes. </strong>Las Úlceras por Presión son un problema de salud pública que afecta al paciente, su familia y el sistema de salud; provocan sufrimiento afectando su calidad de vida. El tratamiento genera altos costos para la institución y aumenta la carga de trabajo en el equipo de salud. Las intervenciones de enfermería para planear el cuidado eficaz, oportuno e individualizado en personas con úlceras por presión, se basan en valoración integral de la persona, actividades de prevención, diagnóstico, tratamiento y rehabilitación con el uso de taxonomías NANDA-NIC-NOC, las cuales permiten responder cuestionamientos sobre la seguridad, eficiencia y costo-efectividad del cuidado de enfermería.</p><p class="normal"><strong>Objetivo.</strong> Proponer un plan de atención de enfermería integral para las personas con Úlceras por Presión.</p><p class="normal"><strong>Materiales y métodos.</strong> Revisión sistemática de literatura científica de los últimos 5 años en las bases de datos MEDLINE, CINAHL, LILACS, FECYT, EMBASE y SCIELO.</p><p class="normal"><strong>Resultados.</strong> Construcción de un plan de atención de enfermería flexible basado en evidencia científica, resultado de los hallazgos de la revisión sistemática, que oriente la toma de decisiones en el cuidado integral de las personas con Úlceras por Presión y contribuya a la calidad de los servicios de salud mejorando la Calidad de Vida relacionada con la Salud.</p><p class="normal"><strong>Conclusiones. </strong>Es preciso brindar un cuidado integral basado en evidencia científica conducente a establecer medidas preventivas que guíe la intervención de enfermería eficaz e individualizada garante de la limitación del daño y la rehabilitación oportuna de las personas con Úlceras por Presión, aportando al desarrollo y visibilidad disciplinar.</p><strong>Palabras Clave. </strong>Atención de Enfermería, Úlcera por Presión, Prevención y Control, Diagnóstico, Tratamiento (DeCS).

Combined treatment with chlorhexidine and 0·9% saline in a newborn infant with an infected surgical wound

Newborns are more susceptible to infection; this makes proper wound care extremely important in them. Unfortunately, in spite of successful surgery, patients can die as a result of wound area infections. Herein, we report a case in which a combined therapy of chlorhexidine (a disinfectant) and saline (a cleansing agent used in wound care) was used effectively to treat the wound in a newborn infant with an antibiotic-resistant, Gram-negative, bacteria-related surgical site infection.

Pressurised irrigation versus swabbing method in cleansing wounds healed by secondary intention: a randomised controlled trial with cost-effectiveness analysis

BACKGROUND

Wound cleansing should create an optimal healing environment by removing excess debris, exudates, foreign and necrotic material which are commonly present in the wounds that heal by secondary intention. At present, there is no research evidence for whether pressurised irrigation has better wound healing outcomes compared with conventional swabbing practice in cleansing wound.

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated the differences between pressurised irrigation and swabbing method in cleansing wounds that healed by secondary intention in relation to wound healing outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

DESIGN

Multicentre, prospective, randomised controlled trial.

SETTING

The study took place in four General Outpatient Clinics in Hong Kong.

METHODS

Two hundred and fifty six patients with wounds healing by secondary intention were randomly assigned by having a staff independent of the study opening a serially numbered, opaque and sealed envelope to either pressurised irrigation (n=122) or swabbing (n=134). Staff undertaking study-related assessments was blinded to treatment assignment. Patients' wounds were followed up for 6 weeks or earlier if wounds had healed to determine wound healing, infection, symptoms, satisfaction, and cost effectiveness. The primary outcome was time-to-wound healing. Patients were analysed according to their treatment allocation. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01885273.

RESULTS

Intention-to-treat analysis showed that pressurised irrigation group was associated with a shorter median time-to-wound healing than swabbing group [9.0 days (95% CI: 7.4-13.8) vs. 12.0 (95% CI: 10.2-13.8); p=0.007]. Pressurised irrigation group has significantly more patients experiencing lower grade of pain during wound cleansing (93.4% vs. 84.2%; p=0.02), and significantly higher median satisfaction with either comfort or cleansing method (MD 1 [95% CI: 5-6]; p=0.002; MD 1 [95% CI: 5-6]; p<0.001) than did swabbing group. Wound infection was reported in 4 (3.3%) patients in pressurised irrigation group and in 7 (5.2%) patients in swabbing group (p=0.44). Cost-effectiveness analysis indicated that pressurised irrigation in comparison with swabbing saved per patient HK$ 110 (95% CI: -33 to 308) and was a cost-effective cleansing method at no extra direct medical cost with a probability of 90%.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first randomised controlled trial to compare the pressurised irrigation and swabbing. Pressurised irrigation is more cost-effective than swabbing in shortening time that wound heals by secondary intention with better patient tolerance. Use of pressurised irrigation for wound cleansing is supported by this trial.

Wound cleansing for pressure ulcers

BACKGROUND

Pressure ulcers (also called pressure sores, bed sores and decubitus ulcers) are areas of tissue damage that occur in the elderly, malnourished or acutely ill, who cannot reposition themselves. Pressure ulcers impose a significant financial burden on health care systems and negatively affect quality of life. Wound cleansing is considered an important component of pressure ulcer care.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review seeks to answer the following question: what is the effect of wound cleansing solutions and wound cleansing techniques on the rate of healing of pressure ulcers?

SEARCH METHODS

For this third update, we searched the Cochrane Wounds Group Specialised Register (searched 3 January 2013); The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2012, Issue 12); Ovid MEDLINE (2010 to November Week 3 2012); Ovid MEDLINE (In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations December 31, 2012); Ovid EMBASE (2010 to 2012 Week 52); and EBSCO CINAHL (2010 to 21 December 2012).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing wound cleansing with no wound cleansing, or different wound cleansing solutions, or different cleansing techniques, were eligible for inclusion if they reported an objective measure of pressure ulcer healing.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data independently and resolved disagreements through discussion. A structured narrative summary of the included studies was conducted. For dichotomous outcomes, risk ratio (RR), plus 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated; for continuous outcomes, mean difference (MD), plus 95% CI were calculated. Meta analysis was not conducted because of the small number of diverse RCTs identified. Two review authors independently assessed each included study using the Cochrane Collaboration tool for assessing risk of bias.

MAIN RESULTS

One additional eligible study was identified from the updated searches, one study was added to the table of excluded studies. A total of three studies (169 participants) met the inclusion criteria for the review. No studies compared cleansing with no cleansing. Two studies compared different wound cleansing solutions. A statistically significant improvement in Pressure Sore Status Tool scores occurred for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) compared with isotonic saline (P value = 0.025), but no statistically significant change in healing was seen when water was compared with saline (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.21 to 41.89). One study compared cleansing techniques; for pressure ulcers cleansed with pulsatile lavage, compared with sham (the lavage flow was directed into a wash basin positioned adjacent to the wound and not visible to the participants), there was a statistically significant reduction in ulcer volume at the end of the three week study period in the lavage group compared with the sham group (MD -6.60, 95% CI-11.23, -1.97).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We identified three small studies addressing cleansing of pressure ulcers. One reported a statistically significant improvement in pressure ulcer healing for wounds cleansed with saline spray containing Aloe vera, silver chloride and decyl glucoside (Vulnopur) compared with isotonic saline solution, a further study reported no statistically significant change in healing was seen when wounds were cleaned with water was compared with saline. A final study compared pulsatile lavage with sham and found a significantly greater reduction in ulcer volume at the end of the study period in the lavage group compared with the sham group. The authors conclude that there is no good trial evidence to support use of any particular wound cleansing solution or technique for pressure ulcers.