Insemination of Holstein heifers at a preset time after estrous cycle synchronization using progesterone and prostaglandin

Standing on giant shoulders: a personal recollection of the lives and achievements of eminent animal scientists 1965–2015

This article is a compilation of pieces that are part biographical sketches and part personal recollections of 18 scientists with whom the author was acquainted in three continents over almost 50 years. The subjects, from Australia, the United States and the United Kingdom, will be recognisable to many in the field, especially more experienced scientists. For younger scientists, the article also is intended to put a human face on a generation of famous researchers who otherwise would be familiar only as somewhat anonymous authors of classic papers and reviews.

Declining fertility in dairy cattle: changes in traditional and endocrine parameters of fertility

Reproductive performance of 714 Holstein Friesian dairy cows was monitored between October 1995 and June 1998 using thrice weekly milk progesterone determinations. Defined endocrine parameters such as interval topost-partumcommencement of luteal activity, inter-ovulatory interval and length of luteal and inter-luteal intervals were used with a number of traditional measures of reproductive performance to investigate the current status of fertility in a sample of United Kingdom dairy herds. A comparison of the results of the 1995 to 1998 trial with those of a previous (1975 to 1982) milk progesterone database, which included 2503 lactations in British Friesian cows monitored using a similar milk sampling protocol, revealed a decline infertility between these periods.

Between 1975-1982 and 1995-1998, pregnancy rate to first service declined from 55·6% to 39·7% (P< 0·001), at a derived average rate approaching 1% per year. This decline was associated with an increase (P< 0·001) in the proportion of animals with one or more atypical ovarian hormone patterns from 32% to 44%. There was a significant (P< 0·001) increase in the incidence of delayed luteolysis during the first cyclepost partum(delayed luteolysis type I; 7·3% to 18·2%) and during subsequent cycles (delayed luteolysis type II; 6·4% to 16·8%), although the incidence of prolonged anovulation post partům (delayed ovulation type I; 10·9% to 12·9%) and prolonged inter-luteal intervals (delayed ovulation type II; 12·9% to 10·6%) did not alter significantly. These changes resulted in an increase in mean luteal phase length from 12·9 (s.e. 0·09) to 14·8 (s.e. 0·17) days and an increase in inter-ovulatory interval from 20·2 (s.e. 0·1) to 22·3 (s.e. 0·2) days. The decline infertility was also reflected in traditional measures of fertility since although interval to first service remained relatively unchanged (74·0 (s.e. 0·4) to 77·6 (s.e. 1·1) days) calving interval lengthened from 370 (s.e. 2·2) to 390 (s.e. 2·5) days. Collectively these changes may have contributed to the decline in pregnancy rates observed over the last 20 years.

Conception rates to fixed-time artificial insemination of two oestrus synchronisation programmes in dairy heifers

AIM

To evaluate the conception rate to fixed-time artificial insemination (FTAI) of two oestrus synchronisation programmes in dairy heifers on eight farms over 2 years.

METHODS

The study was conducted in 2008 and 2010 on eight farms near Palmerston North, New Zealand. Nulliparous Friesian and Friesian×Jersey heifers (13-15 months of age) were randomly allocated to one of two oestrus synchronisation programmes. Group 1 (GPG+P4; n=330), received gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) I/M on Day 0, a progesterone (P4)-releasing intravaginal device from Days 0-7, prostaglandin F2α (PGF) I/M on Day 7 and a second dose of GnRH at the time of FTAI on Day 9. The second group (P4+PGF; n=343) received a P4-releasing intravaginal device from Days 0-7, PGF on Day 6 and FTAI on Day 9. Pregnancy was diagnosed from Days 42-52 by transrectal ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The overall conception rate was 52.4% and 54.8% for the GPG+P4 and P4+PGF groups, respectively. The odds of conception for the two treatments were not different (OR=0.90; 95% CI=0.67-1.23), nor was there any difference between groups in different years (p=0.58). Farm affected conception rate (p=0.002), but there was no interaction with treatment (p=0.92) .

CONCLUSIONS

This study has shown that an alternative synchronisation programme can produce similar results in terms of conception rate to the GPG+P4 treatment, currently commonly used in heifers. More research is required to establish whether other modifications to the GPG+P4 programme can produce similar results at lower costs, and to identify and quantify farm factors which affect the economic benefit of heifer synchronisation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study indicated that synchronising heifers with P4 and PGF resulted in conception rates equivalent to those resulting from a GPG+P4 treatment, but with reduced drug costs. However, because heifers in the GPG+P4 group received the second GnRH injection at the time of AI, they needed only three yardings as opposed to the four required for the heifers treated with P4 and PGF. Thus, the choice of programme for an individual farm will depend on that farm's circumstances, in particular the cost of yarding the heifers.

After 65 years, research is still fun

In 1946, at the end of World War II, I entered graduate school at Cornell University, where I remained for 44 years. During that time, my laboratory produced more than 300 publications in the field of reproductive biology, including studies on nutrition and reproduction, the role of the hypothalamus in pituitary gonadotropin release, corpus luteum formation and function, hormone assays, and estrous cycle synchronization. At age seventy, I retired from Cornell and accepted the Gordon Cain Endowed Professorship at Louisiana State University, where I continued my work on the bovine corpus luteum and added research on the collection, maturation, in vitro fertilization, and culture of bovine oocytes. In 1994, I moved to the Pennington Biomedical Research Center and soon thereafter started the research that led to development of the lytic peptide-gonadotropin conjugates, which target and destroy cancer cell membranes. I am continuing my work on the development of targeted cancer cell drugs and, yes, research is still fun!

Progesterone, follicular, and estrual responses to progesterone-based estrus and ovulation synchronization protocols at five stages of the estrous cycle

The objective was to monitor changes in ovarian status in heifers exposed to a progesterone insert with or without concurrent GnRH injection. Estrus was manipulated in 283 heifers (31 breeding clusters) by administering GnRH, progesterone, and PGF(2alpha) at 5 stages of the estrous cycle. Estrus was presynchronized with a progesterone insert (CIDR) for 7 d before PGF(2alpha) was administered 24 h before insert removal. Successive clusters of heifers were assigned to treatments (2 heifers per treatment) on cycle d 2, 5, 10, 15, and 18. Treatments consisted of a progesterone insert (d 0) for 7 d plus: 1) PGF(2alpha) on d 6, 24 h before insert removal (early PGF); 2) GnRH on d 0 + early PGF(2alpha) (GnRH + early PGF); 3) PGF(2alpha) at insert removal (late PGF); and 4) GnRH on d 0 + late PGF (GnRH + late PGF). Controls received GnRH on d 0 and PGF(2alpha) on d 7. Ovaries were scanned by transrectal ultrasonography on d 0, 2, 7, 9, and 11 to assess follicle diameters and ovulation. Blood was collected on d 0, 2, 6, 7, 8, and 9 to quantify serum concentrations of progesterone. Insemination occurred after detected estrus or by timed artificial insemination (TAI) at 64 h after insert removal. Only 25% of 141 GnRH-treated heifers ovulated by d 2; twice as many ovulated when treatment was initiated on d 5 (46.4%) than on other cycle days (20.3%). Diameters of the largest follicle exposed to GnRH on d 0, 2, 7, or 9 did not differ regardless of whether ovulation occurred. Small treatment and stage of cycle differences in diameter of the largest follicle were detected on d 2, 7, and 9. Compared with controls, progesterone concentration was greater in all progesterone-treated heifers on d 2 and 6. Early- vs. late-PGF treatment resulted in less progesterone on d 7 and 8. Pregnancies per AI were less after TAI (44%) than after detected estrus (56%) and were less in controls than in all progesterone treatments. Heifers in which treatments were initiated on d 10 of the cycle had the most consistent (estrus vs. TAI) pregnancies per AI (65.4%) compared with other cycle days. Compared with controls, more progesterone-treated heifers ovulated by 96 h after insert removal. Application of the progesterone insert reduced variance of the interval to estrus after insert removal (or PGF(2alpha) injection in controls) by 1.6-fold compared with controls. These results do not support the use of GnRH in a progesterone-based synchronization protocol.

Comparison of progestin-based protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation before fixed-time artificial insemination in postpartum beef cows1

This experiment was designed to compare pregnancy rates in postpartum beef cows resulting from fixed-time AI (FTAI) after treatment with 1 of 2 protocols to synchronize estrus and ovulation. Cross-bred, suckled beef cows (n = 650) at 4 locations (n = 210; n = 158; n = 88; and n = 194) were assigned within a location to 1 of 2 protocols within age group by days postpartum and BCS. Cows assigned to the melengestrol acetate (MGA) Select treatment (MGA Select; n = 327) were fed MGA (0.5 mg x head(-1) x d(-1)) for 14 d, GnRH (100 microg of Cystorelin i.m.) was injected on d 26, and prostaglandin F2alpha (PG; 25 mg of Lutalyse i.m.) was injected on d 33. Cows assigned to the CO-Synch + controlled internal drug release (CIDR) protocol (CO-Synch + CIDR; n = 323) were fed a carrier for 14 d, were injected with GnRH and equipped with an EAZI-BREED CIDR insert (1.38 g of progesterone, Pfizer Animal Health, New York, NY) 12 d after carrier removal, and PG (25 mg of Lutalyse i.m.) was injected and the CIDR were removed on d 33. Fixed-time AI was performed at 72 or 66 h after PG for the MGA Select or CO-Synch + CIDR groups, respectively. All cows were injected with GnRH (100 microg of Cystorelin i.m.) at the time of insemination. Blood samples were collected 8 and 1 d before the beginning of MGA or carrier to determine estrous cyclicity status of the cows (estrous cycling vs. anestrus) before treatment [progesterone > or = 0.5 ng/mL (MGA Select, 185/327, 57%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 177/323, 55%); P = 0.65]. There was no difference (P = 0.20) in pregnancy rate to FTAI between treatments (MGA Select, 201/327, 61%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 214/323, 66%). There was also no difference (P = 0.25) between treatments in final pregnancy rate at the end of the breeding period (MGA Select, 305/327, 93%; CO-Synch + CIDR, 308/323, 95%). These data indicate that pregnancy rates to FTAI were comparable after administration of the MGA Select or CO-Synch + CIDR protocols. Both protocols provide opportunities for beef producers to utilize AI and potentially eliminate the need to detect estrus.

Endometritis treatment with a PGF2α analog does not improve reproductive performance in a large dairy herd in Argentina

In Argentina, most dairy cows with endometritis are treated with prostaglandin (PGF(2alpha) or its analogs) and insemination is withheld until there are no signs of endometritis. The objective of the present study was to evaluate if this method of managing endometritis enhances reproductive performance. Three experiments were conducted over 4 years in a large farm in the west of Buenos Aires province. In Experiment 1, half of the cows diagnosed with endometritis (>1.5-fold difference in diameter of uterine horns, as determined by rectal palpation) received standard endometritis management (treatment with tiaprost, a PGF(2alpha) analog, rectal palpation every 20 days, and withholding of AI until endometritis apparently resolved) and the other half was untreated, with AI at the first estrus after the voluntary waiting period. Untreated cows were inseminated and conceived 20 days earlier than treated cows, and the pregnancy rate by Day 90 postpartum was higher in the untreated group. In Experiment 2, cows with endometritis were divided into four groups according to the severity of symptoms; within each group, cows were allocated to treatment or control, as in Experiment 1. Although first service conception rate decreased as endometritis severity increased, reproductive performance in treated versus control cows was similar to that of Experiment 1 (with no interaction due to degree of endometritis). Re-evaluation of the treated cow (to confirm uterine "normality") may have been responsible for the delay in conception in both experiments. The objective of Experiment 3 was to determine the effects of tiaprost treatment on clinically normal postpartum cows (no evidence of endometritis). Tiaprost treatment reduced the interval from calving to conception in multiparous cows, but it delayed conception and reduced the conception rate in primiparous cows. In conclusion, treatment with tiaprost impaired reproductive performance in primiparous cows (in the absence of endometritis). Furthermore, the standard treatment for endometritis (treatment with a prostaglandin analog and withholding insemination until clinical signs abated) impaired reproductive performance and increased costs.

A Bayesian meta-analysis of the effects of administering an intra-vaginal (CIDR) device in combination with other hormones on the reproductive performance of cycling, anoestrous and inseminated cows

AIMS

To evaluate the effectiveness of treatment programmes that included controlled internal drug-releasing (CIDR) devices containing progesterone (P4) in improving synchrony of oestrus, and conception and pregnancy rates in cycling, anoestrous and inseminated dairy cows, using meta-analysis. To describe the difference in response between cycling and anoestrous cows to CIDR-based synchrony programmes.

METHODS

Scientific papers written in the English language between 1989 and 2002 that investigated the effects of treatment programmes including CIDR devices on reproductive performance in dairy heifers or lactating dairy cows were identified using a computerised literature search. The criteria for inclusion incorporated evidence that treatment allocation was completely randomised; the population studied was lactating dairy cows; and that data were available on submission, conception and pregnancy rates and their associated measures of variability. Reproductive outcomes from 25 synchrony trials (total n=11,058 cows) were analysed. Summary measures of the effect of treatment on reproductive outcome were assessed using fixed- and random-effects Bayesian meta-analysis models.

RESULTS

Treatment programmes including a CIDR device increased the risk of submission in cycling cows (predicted Bayesian RR=2.86, 95% credible interval=1.46-5.67). Compared with controls, synchrony programmes including CIDR devices in cycling dairy cows had no effect on the risk of conception to first service post-treatment (predicted Bayesian RR=1.00, 95% credible interval=0.80-1.24). Compared with controls, synchrony programmes including CIDR devices had no effect on the risk of pregnancy throughout the mating period (predicted Bayesian RR=1.02, 95% credible interval=0.89-1.17). In anoestrous cows, CIDR treatment had no effect on the risk of conception to first service post-treatment and no effect on the risk of pregnancy throughout the mating period, compared with anoestrous, untreated controls (predicted Bayesian RR=0.91 and 0.97, respectively; 95% credible interval=0.68-1.26 and 0.59-1.60, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis showed that synchrony programmes using CIDR devices combined with other hormones reliably enhanced submission rates in lactating dairy cows. The relatively small number of trials with data suitable for analysis and the heterogeneity of results at the individual trial level limited our ability to confirm either a beneficial or deleterious effect of treatment on conception or pregnancy rates. Further randomised, controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness of this form of reproductive therapy in commercial dairy farms are needed.

Fertility of Bunaji (zebu) cows after treatment with PRID with or without PGF2alpha

A study was undertaken to determine the oestrus response and fertility rates of zebu cows treated with PRID alone or in combination with PGF2alpha. A total of 184 non-suckled cycling Bunaji cows were allotted randomly to four treatment groups of 46 animals per group as follows: group 1 (PRID-12), PRID was inserted for 12 days; group 2 (PRID+7+PGF2alpha-6, PRID was inserted for 7 days and PGF2alpha was administered intramuscularly 1 day prior to PRID withdrawal; group 3 (PRID-7+PGF2alpha-7, PRID was inserted for 7 days and PGF2alpha was administered intramuscularly on the day of PRID withdrawal; group 4 (2 x PGF2alpha-13, two intramuscular injections of PGF2alpha 13 days apart. At the end of each treatment period, the cows were observed for 7 days for behavioural oestrus and were inseminated 12 h following detection of oestrus. Pregnancy was diagnosed by rectal palpation 30-40 days post-insemination. The respective oestrus response rates were 78.3%, 76.1%, 87.0% and 89.1% for groups 1-4. While the corresponding pregnancy rates were 39.1%, 41.3%, 52.2% and 52.2%, the conception rates were 50.0%, 54.3%, 60.3% and 58.6% for groups 1-4. Although individual variations in progesterone levels were observed, the progesterone profiles were generally typical and normal. The results of the study have confirmed the effectiveness of the four regimes in synchronizing and controlling oestrus and ovulation in Bunaji cows. However, groups 3 and 4 showed some superiority over the other treatments. The results of this study provide feasible options from which clinicians involved in intensive breeding programmes and herd health fertility programmes can choose.

Supplemental norgestomet, progesterone, or melengestrol acetate increases pregnancy rates in suckled beef cows after timed inseminations

In Exp. 1, 187 lactating beef cows were treated with injections of GnRH 7 d before and 48 h after prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha; Cosynch) or with Cosynch plus a 7-d treatment with an intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing insert (CIDR-B; Cosynch + CIDR). In Exp. 2, 183 lactating beef cows were treated with the Cosynch protocol or with Cosynch plus a 7-d treatment with norgestomet (Cosynch + NORG). In Exp. 1 and 2, blood samples for later P4 analyses were collected on d -17, -7 (first GnRH injection), 0 (PGF2alpha injection), and at timed artificial insemination (TAI; 48 h after PGF2alpha). In Exp. 3, 609 lactating beef cows were treated with the Cosynch + CIDR protocol or were fed 0.5 mg of melengestrol acetate (MGA) per day for 14 d before initiating the Cosynch protocol 12 d after the 14th d of MGA feeding (MGA + Cosynch). Blood samples were collected as in Exp. 1 and 2, plus additional samples on d -33 and -19 before PGF2alpha. In Exp. 4, 360 lactating beef cows were treated with a Cosynch + CIDR protocol, with TAI occurring at either 48 or 60 h after PGF2alpha, while receiving either GnRH or saline to form four treatments. Blood samples were collected as in Exp. 1 and 2. In Exp. 1, addition of P4 reduced the ability of the first GnRH injection to induce ovulation in anestrous cows with low P4 before PGF2alpha but improved (P = 0.06) pregnancy rates (61 vs 66%). In Exp. 2, the addition of NORG mimicked P4 by likewise increasing (P < 0.01) pregnancy rates (31 vs 51%) beyond those after Cosynch. In Exp. 3, the Cosynch + CIDR protocol increased (P < 0.001) pregnancy rates from 46 to 55% compared to the MGA + Cosynch protocol. In Exp. 4, administration of GnRH at TAI improved (P < 0.05) pregnancy outcomes (50 vs 42%), whereas timing of TAI had limited effects. We conclude that a progestin treatment concurrent with the Cosynch protocol improved pregnancy outcomes in all experiments, but pretreatment of cows with MGA was not as effective as the CIDR insert or NORG implants in this Cosynch-TAI model. Most of the improvement in pregnancy rates was associated with the increase in pregnancy rates of anestrous cows, regardless of whether ovulation was successfully induced in response to GnRH 7 d before PGF2alpha. Injection of GnRH at TAI following the Cosynch + CIDR protocol increased pregnancy rates in cycling cows with high P4 before the PGF2alpha injection and in anestrous cows with low P4 before PGF2alpha injection.

Characteristics of estrus before and after first insemination and fertility of heifers after synchronized estrus using GnRH, PGF2alpha, and progesterone

Our objectives were to determine fertility of heifers after synchronization of estrus using PGF2alpha, preceded by progesterone (P4), GnRH, or both, and to examine the variability of estrual characteristics in heifers before first and second AI. Dairy (n = 247) and beef (n = 193) heifers were assigned randomly to each of three treatments: 1) 50 microg of GnRH (injected i.m.) administered on d -7 followed by 25 mg of PGF2alpha (i.m.) on d -1 (GnRH + PGF; modified Select Synch protocol); 2) placement of an intravaginal progesterone (P4)-releasing insert on d -7, PGF2alpha on d -1, and insert removal on d 0 (P4+PGF); and 3) 50 microg of GnRH plus a P4 insert on d -7, followed by 25 mg of PGF2alpha on d -1, and insert removal on d 0 (P4+GnRH+PGF). Characteristics of estrus were examined before first AI and before the next eligible AI (18 to 26 d later), including duration of estrus, number of standing events, and total and individual duration of standing events. In addition, all heifers were checked visually at least twice daily for estrus. Blood samples were collected on d -7, -1, and 0 for determination of P4, and pregnancy status was diagnosed by ultrasonography 27 to 34 d after AI. Rates of detected estrus were less (P < 0.05) in dairy than in beef heifers, and greater (P < 0.05) in heifers treated with P4. Pattern of conception and pregnancy rates among treatments differed between beef and dairy heifers (treatment x group interaction; P < 0.05). In dairy heifers, conception and pregnancy rates were greatest with P4+PGF, followed by P4+GnRH+PGF and GnRH+PGF, respectively. The opposite was observed among treatments in beef heifers. Administration of P4 without the preceding injection of GnRH produced the lowest pregnancy rates in beefheifers. Ofthe quantified sexual behavioral characteristics during the synchronized estrus, the number of standing events and total duration of standing events were greater (P < 0.01) than those observed during the next eligible estrus before second AI, whereas duration of estrus was unaffected.

Effect of oestrous synchronization with estradiol 17beta and progesterone on follicular wave dynamics in dairy heifers

An experiment was designed to evaluate the effects of estradiol-17beta (E17beta) on follicular wave dynamics and ovulatory response in Holstein heifers receiving either a progestogen ear-implant (Crestar; Intervet International b.v. Boxmeer, The Netherlands) or an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device [controlled internal drug release-bovine device (Eazibreed, CIDR-B; Bodinco BV, Alkmaar, The Netherlands)]. For comparison, another group of heifers was also synchronized using Crestar plus an injection of estradiol valerate (EV) and norgestomet as recommended by the pharmaceutical company. Twenty 20-22-month-old cycling Holstein heifers were allocated to one of the following treatment groups at random stages of the oestrous cycle: (I) simultaneous insertion of Crestar and intramuscular injection of 3 mg norgestomet and 5 mg EV (Crestar 9 + EV 9); (II) simultaneous insertion of Crestar and intramuscular injection of 5 mg E17beta (Crestar 9 + E17beta 9); (III) insertion of Crestar followed 2 days later by intramuscular injection of 5 mg E17beta (Crestar 9 + E17beta 7); or (IV) insertion of CIDR-B device followed 2 days later by intramuscular injection of 5 mg E17beta (CIDR 9 + E17beta 7). The CIDR-B or Crestar implants were removed after 9 days and all heifers received 500 microg Cloprostenol (Estrumate, Pitman-Moore Nederland BV, Houten. The Netherlands). Ovarian ultrasonographic examinations were performed once daily during the synchronization period using a B-mode scanner equipped with a 7.5 MHz linear-array transrectal transducer. In addition, heifers were scanned every 12 h after implant/device withdrawal until 3 days after ovulation in order to monitor follicular activity, detect ovulation and subsequent early luteal formation. Detection of oestrus was performed every 6 h for 4 days after device/implant removal. Oestrus was observed 24-32 h before ovulation in all heifers. The mean hours interval from treatment withdrawal to ovulation was not significantly different (84.0 +/- 16.5, 77.6 +/- 4.1, 73.6 +/- 4.1 and 64.0 +/- 4.4 h for treatments I, II, III and IV, respectively, p > 0.1). However, the variance for heifers treated with EV + norgestomet was significantly larger (Levene's Test; p < 0.01) than those treated with E17beta. All E17beta treatments resulted in dominant follicle suppression and a new wave emerged 4.1 days after treatment compared with 6.6 days for the EV + norgestomet treatment (p < 0.05). The time from emergence of the new ovulatory wave to ovulation was longer for the new wave that emerged after E17beta treatment (9.2 +/- 0.3 days) than after EV + norgestomet treatment (6.9 +/- 0.4 days; p < 0.05). The results of this study suggest that the four treatments used were effective in inducing synchronous behavioural oestrus and ovulation. However, a higher degree of oestrus and ovulation synchrony was observed in heifers treated with E17beta than in heifers treated with EV + norgestomet. Synchronization treatments with exogenous E17beta or EV + norgestomet at the time of progestin device insertion (Crestar or CIDR-B) or 2 days later in heifers can regulate a different emergence pattern of ovarian follicular development in randomly cyclic heifers. The E17beta was effective in inducing follicular suppression and resulted in the consistent emergence of a new follicular wave.

Recent advances in bovine reproductive endocrinology and physiology and their impact on drug delivery system design for the control of the estrous cycle in cattle

When methods of drug intervention are being developed to control estrous cycles, a thorough understanding of the endocrine and functional changes together with the reproductive behavior of the animals are essential. This review presents our current knowledge on reproductive endocrinology, physiology and behavior, and the methods of drug intervention to control estrous cycles. It also describes current efforts to develop advanced drug delivery systems that meet the animal scientist's demands to control the estrous cycle in cattle.

Induction of ovulation in postpartum suckled beef cows: a review

Prolonged postpartum acyclicity in suckled beef cows reduces the calf crop, and causes economic loss to beef cattle producers. Once anterior pituitary LH stores have been replenished between Days 15 and 30 post partum in suckled beef cows, methods to initiate cyclicity include non-hormonal methods such as weaning of calves (either complete, temporary or partial), or exposure to bulls, and hormonal methods such as administration of GnRH (either single injection, intermittent injections, or continuous infusion), gonadotropins (eCG, FSH, hCG), and steroids (estrogens, anti-estrogens, and progestogens). Weaning is costly, reduces growth rate of weaned calves, and short cycles are common after weaning-induced ovulation. Exposure of cows to bulls is not practical and its effect is not predictable. Repeated injections of GnRH, or a single injection of hCG are not always effective; ovulation is always followed by a short cycle, and usually a return to acyclicity. Estrogens and anti-estrogens do not consistently shorten postpartum anestrus. Exogenous progestogens include intravaginal devices, such as controlled-internal drug release (CIDR) or progesterone-releasing intravaginal device (PRID), norgestomet implants, and the feed-additive melengestrol acetate (MGA). Administration of exogenous progestogens is more practical than, and offers more advantages over, other treatments to shorten postpartum acyclicity in suckled beef cows. Mimicking the short cycle after Week 3 post partum, by maintaining circulating progesterone at subluteal concentrations or circulating progestin at intermediate concentrations, extends the life-span and allows terminal maturation of the postpartum dominant follicle as in cyclic cows, by initiating endogenous GnRH and LH pulses. This is followed by an LH surge, ovulation and normal cycles. The benefit from using exogenous progestogens after Week 3 post partum in suckled beef cows is that ovulation is induced, cyclicity is initiated, the resulting CL has a normal life-span and function, and there is no need to change management, such as weaning of calves. We present a model for the induction of ovulation and initiation of cyclicity using exogenous progestogens after Week 3 post partum in suckled beef cows.

Fertility regulation in cattle

This paper reviews the physiological, endocrinological and pharmaceutical literature pertaining to the design, development and optimisation of subcutaneous and intravaginal progestogen-containing drug delivery systems used in the control of synchrony and ovulation in cattle.

Effects of short-term treatment with progesterone superimposed on 11 or 17 days of norgestomet treatment on the interval to oestrus and fertility in Bos indicus heifers

The aims of this study were to determine: (1) if short-term treatment of Bos indicus heifers with progesterone (P4) while implanted with a s.c. norgestomet implant for 17 days would influence the time interval to oestrus and increase fertility of the synchronised oestrus, and (2) whether the response to treatment with P4 would differ between heifers treated with a norgestomet implant for 17 vs. 11 days when short-term treatment with P4 is applied 3 days prior to implant removal. B. indicus heifers at two separate sites (A and B) were allocated to three groups at each site. Heifers in two groups (NG and NGP4 groups) were given a single s.c. norgestomet implant on the first day of treatment (day 0) while heifers in a third group (NGP4PG group) were implanted on day 6. A single P4 releasing Controlled Internal Drug Release device (CIDR) was inserted on day 14 in heifers in the NGP4 and NGP4PG groups and was removed 23.5 +/- 0.07 h later (day 15). Heifers in the NGP4PG group were administered an analogue of prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF2 alpha) at the time of CIDR removal to regress corpora lutea. Implants were removed from all heifers on the same day (day 17) and a 400 IU of equine chorionic gonadotrophin (ECG) was administered s.c. Animals were artificially inseminated 11.1 +/- 0.17 h after detection of oestrus, using frozen semen from one bull at site A and one of five bulls at site B. Inseminations were carried out by one of two technicians. Treatment with P4 delayed oestrus and reduced the synchrony of oestrus at site A (hours to oestrus +/- SD: NG group, 39.0 +/- 13.7; NGP4 group, 66.3 +/- 24.4; NGP4PG group, 58.9 +/- 20.5 h; P < 0.05) but not at site B (41.4 +/- 15.2, 42.5 +/- 10.1, 45.4 +/- 10.3 h; P > 0.05). Pregnancy rates 6 weeks after insemination were found to be significantly associated with bull (P < 0.001), treatment group (P = 0.013) and insemination technician (P = 0.033). Pregnancy rates were greater in the heifers in the NGP4 group than heifers in the NG group [50.3% (78/155) vs. 36.4% (60/165); odds ratio = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.14 to 2.96] and similar between heifers in the NGP4 and NGP4PG groups [50.3% (78/155) vs. 51.1% (63/117); odds ratio = 1.06, 95% CI = 0.67 to 1.69]. It was concluded that acute treatment with P4 can improve pregnancy rates in B. indicus heifers treated for 17 days with norgestomet implants. Reducing the duration of norgestomet treatment to 11 days and administration of PGF2 alpha at the time of ending treatment with a CIDR device resulted in no differences in fertility, mean intervals to oestrus or synchrony of oestrus.

The fertility of autumn calving suckler beef cows is increased by the addition of prostaglandin to progesterone and eCG estrus synchronization treatment

The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy of PGF2 alpha treatment on pregnancy and calving rates in autumn-calving suckler beef cows synchronized with progesterone and eCG. The population studied consisted of 124 Charolais and 130 Limousin cows in 13 and 12 beef herds, respectively. In each herd, pairs of cows were formed according to parity, body condition score and calving difficulty. Group 1 received a progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID) for 12 d with a capsule containing 10 mg estradiol benzoate at implant insertion and 500 IU eCG at PRID removal (Day 0). Group 2 received the same treatment plus 25 mg i.m. dinoprost at Day -2. Each cow was artificially inseminated 56 h after PRID removal (Day 3). Plasma progesterone concentrations were measured to determine cyclicity prior to treatment in samples take on Days -22 and -12, to confirm the occurrence of ovulation (Day 13) and to determine the early pregnancy rate (Day 26). Serum pregnancy-specific protein B (PSPB) concentrations were determined to assess pregnancy rate at Day 39. The effects of variation factors on pregnancy and calving rates after treatment were studied using logistic mixed models and a Cox model, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups or breeds for the rate of cyclicity before treatment nor for ovulation rate (means, 74.1 and 95.7%, respectively). Cyclicity was, however, influenced by individual factors such as body condition score (OR = 3.36, P = 0.001), parity (OR = 5.4, P = 0.001) and herd factors such as stocking rate (OR = 5.62, P = 0.001). The use of a prostaglandin injection increased pregnancy rate at Day 26 (71.7 vs 56.7%, P = 0.01) and at 39 d (67.7 vs 54.3%, P = 0.02) and the calving rate at induced estrus (64.5 vs 48.5%, P = 0.01). We observed 9 twin calvings (5.6%) which occurred in cyclic cows only before treatment. Cows in Group 2 had a 1.5 greater chance of calving before 300 d following the first AI than cows in Group 1 (P = 0.03). In conclusion, the addition of PGF2 alpha injection, 48 h before PRID removal, increased reproductive efficiency in autumn-calving Charolais and Limousin suckler beef cows compared to a classical estrus synchronization treatment using a PRID + eCG.

Treatment with progesterone and 17 beta-oestradiol to induce emergence of a newly-recruited dominant ovulatory follicle during oestrus synchronisation with long-term use of norgestomet in Brahman heifers

The aim of this study was to determine the effect on ovarian follicular growth and atresia, of acute treatment with either 100 mg of progesterone (n = 10), 200 mg of progesterone (n = 10), 10 mg of oestradiol + 100 mg of progesterone (n = 10), 10 mg of oestradiol (n = 10) or no treatment (n = 10), given on Day 10 of a 17-day treatment with a norgestomet implant in randomly cycling Bos indicus heifers. The fate of the dominant follicle on Day 10, emergence of the new cohort of follicles and the intervals from implant removal to ovulation were recorded by ultrasonography. Plasma concentrations of Luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone and oestradiol were determined during the time when the norgestomet implant was in place. All treatments resulted in the emergence of a new cohort of follicles within 5 days of administration. The day of emergence of the ovulatory follicle tended to be delayed after treatment with 100 mg of progesterone (2.7 +/- 0.3 days after treatment), 200 mg of progesterone (3.7 +/- 0.5 days after treatment), 10 mg of oestradiol + 100 mg of progesterone (4.4 +/- 0.2 days after treatment) and 10 mg of oestradiol (4.6 +/- 0.4 days after treatment) compared to control heifers (1.4 +/- 1.4 days after time of treatment). The mean interval from implant removal to onset of oestrus was significantly shorter after treatment with 100 mg of progesterone (38.4 +/- 2.6 h) than after treatment with 200 mg of progesterone (61.5 +/- 3.9 h) but otherwise, the mean interval from implant removal to onset of oestrus did not differ. Oestrus synchrony, measured by the sample standard deviation of oestrus onset, was tighter in all treatment groups compared to untreated control heifers. The mean interval from implant removal to ovulation did not differ significantly between groups. The synchrony of ovulation, measured by the sample standard deviation of the interval from implant removal to ovulation, was significantly tighter after treatment with 100 mg of progesterone, 200 mg of progesterone and 10 mg of oestradiol compared to control heifers. Treatment with 10 mg of oestradiol resulted in ovulation in seven of 10 heifers before implant removal, three of which failed to ovulate after implant removal. Progesterone administered on Day 10 lowered plasma LH concentrations (P < 0.05), whereas treatment with oestradiol caused a surge of LH and ovulation. Progesterone administered with oestradiol prevented the LH surge. A combination treatment of oestradiol and progesterone given on Day 10 of a 17-day norgestomet treatment in a range of follicular states resulted in the consistent emergence of a new cohort of follicles which included the eventual ovulatory follicle.

Conceptual and commercially available intravaginal veterinary drug delivery systems

In the veterinary area the utilization of the vagina as a route for drug delivery has focused on the systemic delivery of hormonal steroids to control synchrony, ovulation and fertility in a variety of livestock. There are several reasons for administering drugs to modify the menstrual cycle in humans and the estrous cycle in animals and this paper provides a comparison of the objectives of drug intervention to control reproduction in humans and livestock. In addition, the types of hormones and their concentrations found during the menstrual cycle in humans and during the estrous cycle in animals are compared. The paper also reviews the intravaginal drug delivery systems developed for the control of the estrous cycle in livestock and both conceptual and commercially available intravaginal drug delivery systems that have been described in the literature are described. The history of some of the delivery systems is included and the future directions of this area of research are discussed.

Synchronization of estrus and ovulation and associated endocrine changes in cows

The effects of 4 estrus synchronization treatments on intervals to and synchrony of estrus and ovulation, on timing of the preovulatory LH surge and associated changes in plasma progesterone, LH, FSH, and 17beta-estradiol (E(2)) were investigated in 48 Bos indicus cows. Treatment 1 consisted of 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) 14 d apart (n = 12); Treatment 2 of a subcutaneous 3-mg norgestomet implant and an intramuscular injection of 3 mg of norgestomet and 5 mg estradiol valerate, with the implant removed 10 d later (n = 12; norgestomet-estradiol); Treatment 3 of norgestomet-estradiol, with a subcutaneous injection of PMSG given at time of implant removal (Day 10; n = 12); and Treatment 4 of norgestomet implant (as for Treatments 2 and 3) inserted for 10 d, with an intramuscular injection of PGF(2alpha) given at the time of implant removal (n = 12). The experiment was conducted in 2 replicates (24 cows/replicate, 6 cows/group). Estrus, ovulation and timing of the preovulatory surge of LH varied less in cows treated with norgestomet-estradiol and PMSG than in cows in Treatments 1 and 4 (P < 0.008). Treatment with PMSG reduced variation in ovulation times and timing of the LH surge in cows treated with norgestomet-estradiol (P < 0.02). Concentrations of E(2) were higher in cows in Treatments 2 and 3 on the final day of treatment and at about 6 h post ovulation compared with cows in Treatments 1 and 4 (P < 0.05). Different methods for synchronizing estrus did not alter sequential endocrine and behavioral changes in relation to the timing of the LH peak, and the results were consistent with current recommendations for insemination times in Bos taurus cattle.

Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows following estrus synchronization regimens with PGF2α and progesterone

The objective of this study was to evaluate the reproductive performance of lactating cows in seasonal dairy herds after estrus synchronization with PGF2alpha (PG) with or without supplementation with progesterone (P4). In Trial 1, synchronized cows (S1; n = 521) were compared with untreated control cows (C; n = 518) in 5 herds. Estrus of cows in the S1 group was synchronized with 2 treatments of PG (Lutalyse) 13 d apart. The breeding season started 2 d after the second PG. Cows were first bred by AI for 7 wk and then herd sires were used. Compared with C cows, estrus synchronization in the treated cows reduced the conception rate to first AI (61.1 vs 70.5%; P < 0.01) and the intervals from start of the breeding season to conception for cows conceiving to AI (11.0 vs 14.6 d; P < 0.05) or to both AI and natural mating (16.5 vs 18.4 d; P < 0.05). There was no effect on conception rate to second AI (68.8%), on pregnancy rate by Day 24 (72.3%) or Day 49 (86.3%) of the breeding season, or on the percentage of cows not pregnant at end of the breeding season (5.0%). In Trial 2, effects of P4 supplementation before the second PG on reproductive performance were evaluated in 4 herds. Estrus of each cyclic cow was synchronized with PG as in Trial 1. Half of the cows in each herd were treated with an intravaginal P4 device (CIDR) for 5 d before the second PG (S2+P4, n = 608), whereas the remaining half received no CIDR treatment (S2, n = 593). Compared with S2 cows, P4 treatment increased the estrous response rate to the second PG (89.6 vs 82.9%; P < 0.01), the conception rate to first AI (65.1 vs 59.7%; P = 0.07), the pregnancy rate by Day 6 of the breeding season (59.3 vs 49.0%; P < 0.001), and reduced the intervals from start of the breeding season to conception for cows conceiving to AI (8.6 vs 10.4 d; P < 0.10) or to both AI and natural mating (12.7 vs 16.4 d; P < 0.01). Treatment with a used CIDR from Days 16 to 21 after start of breeding to re-synchronize returns to service had no effect on conception rate to first or second AI but may decrease the conception rate to second AI in cows previously treated with CIDR. In conclusion, estrus synchronization with the double PG system can reduce fertility, while P4 supplementation for 5 d before the second PG can improve estrous response and overall reproductive performance. Stage of the estrous cycle at the time of the second PG can affect fertility following synchronization.

Reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows following oestrus synchronisation with progesterone, oestradiol and prostaglandin

The ability to synchronise onset of oestrus, and hence the time of breeding and calving, offers potential economic and management benefits to dairy farmers, especially in herds with seasonally concentrated calving patterns. A trial involving 2681 cows in 11 seasonal herds was conducted to evaluate the reproductive performance of lactating dairy cows following oestrus synchronisation with a combination of progesterone, oestradiol and prostaglandin. Cows were randomly assigned within herds to synchronised and control groups, balanced for age, date of calving, body condition and breed. Cows in the synchronised group were treated with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device containing 1.9 g of progesterone and a gelatin capsule containing 10 mg of oestradiol benzoate 10 days prior to the planned start of the breeding season (Day 0). The device was removed 8 days later on Day -2 and a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin F2alpha was administered 2 days prior to removal of the progesterone-releasing device. Returns to service for cows in the synchronised group were synchronised by inserting a previously used intravaginal device during Days 16-21 after the start of the breeding season. Cows in the control group were left untreated. The percentage of cows being inseminated during the first 5 days was 89.0% for the synchronised group compared to 29.7% for the control group. Compared to cows in the control group, those in the synchronised group had a lower conception rate to the first insemination (52.9% v. 64.3%, p<0.001), a lower conception rate to the second insemination (51.8% v. 62.5%, p<0.001), a higher percentage of empty cows at the end of the breeding season (7.3% v. 5.1%, p<0.05), and more insemination services per pregnancy to artificial insemination (2.0 v. 1.6, p<0.001). There was no difference between the synchronised and control groups in the percentage of cows pregnant to artificial insemination (81.8% v. 85.5%, p>0.10). The mean day of conception from the start of the breeding season was advanced (p>0.0 1) by 1.3 days in synchronised cows (19.9 +/- 0.7 days; mean +/- SEM) compared to control cows (21.2 +/- 0.5 days). It is concluded that the oestrus synchronisation regime used in the present study caused a reduction in fertility, which reduced the potential gains from using such a programme to increase reproductive efficiency in dairy cows.

Application of knowledge about corpus luteum function in control of estrus and ovulation in cattle

Understanding corpus luteum (CL) function has led to development of methods of estrus synchronization in cattle that either extend the estrous cycle by administration of exogenous progestins or shorten the cycle by induction of luteolysis. Both methods have limitations, which have been reduced or overcome through sequential or combined treatment with progestin and luteolytic drugs. Future improvements in estrus synchronization methodology are most likely to come from achieving more synchrony between the development of a highly fertile ovulatory follicle and control of luteal function.

The effects of lactation on the fertility of dairy cows

Lactation has been negatively associated with fertility because pregnancy rates in maiden heifers exceed those obtained after first or subsequent calvings. The extent of this difference is less in pasture-fed dairy cows ( < 10%) than in American Holsteins ( > 20%) fed grain and conserved forages. The latter cows have pregnancy rates to first insemination and oestrus detection rates of only 40 to 45%. This suggests that the subsequent fertility of inherently fertile Holstein heifers may be severely compromised by high levels of milk production. International comparisons show that pasture-fed dairy cows may experience extended periods of anovulatory anoestrum but have normal fertility (60% pregnancy rate to first insemination) once cycling. The high-producing American Holstein may ovulate within 4 weeks postpartum but is more likely to continue ovulating without being detected in oestrus. Both situations are associated with negative energy balances (NEB) during early lactation. The severity and duration of this NEB may vary with body condition at calving, age or parity, ration formulation, production level and environmental factors. Relative daily milk yield is not an absolute indicator of NEB, because some lower producing cows within a herd have lower feed intakes and more severe energy deficits. NEB is not simple to measure; nonetheless, it is correlated with genetic improvement for milk yield. A positive energy balance, greater weight gain and higher body condition score have all been shown to be positively correlated with plasma progesterone concentrations in early lactation. No studies have investigated the possibility that the rapid increase in metabolic rate at this time may also alter steroid concentrations with consequent effects on oestrous behaviour and fertility. Studies to more precisely define the effects of increasing milk yields in early lactation, especially in Holsteins, may need to be completed in Australia and New Zealand. Oestrus detection rates and pregnancy rates for American Holsteins of less than 50% are accepted widely in the USA. Such low detection rates confound studies on fertility. The objective should be to increase these 2 rates to at least 80% and 60% respectively. This may involve the use of controlled breeding, especially if oestrous behaviour is less overt in high-producing Holstein cows.

Synchronization of estrus in embryo transfer recipients after using a combination of PRID or CIDR-B plus PGF2α

The use of CIDR-B or PRID in combination with prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) for synchronizing estrus in embryo transfer recipients was evaluated in 2 experiments. In Experiment 1, virgin heifers (n=263) were synchronized using either a PRID (including estradiol benzoate capsule) or a CIDR-B in a combined program in which devices were inserted on Day 1, an injection of prostaglandin was given on Day 6, and devices were withdrawn on Day 7. The interval from device removal to the onset of estrus was significantly shorter for CIDR-B than for PRID-treated animals (50.44 vs 55.50 hours; P<0.003). The CIDR-B treatment resulted in a similar degree of synchrony to the PRID treatment (74.0 vs 70.4%; P=0.68). InExperiment 2, cows (n=95) and heifers (n=93) were allocated at random to be synchronized using a PRID (excluding estradiol benzoate capsule) plus PGF2alpha or a CIDR-B device plus PGF2alpha. The devices were inserted on Day 1, an injection of prostaglandin was given on Day 10 and the devices were removed on Day 12. Estrus was observed earlier following the CIDR-B treatment (43.50 vs 47.04 hours; P=0.01), but the degree of synchrony was similar (76.2 vs 76.3%; P>0.10) for the CIDR-B and PRID-treated animals. In both experiments, there were no significant differences in the proportions of animals observed in estrus, selected as embryo transfer recipients, or which achieved pregnancy consequent on embryo transfer between those synchronized using CIDR-B or PRID regimens. We conclude that the CIDR-B is a suitable device for synchronizing estrus in embryo transfer recipients.

Nuclear volume and chromatin conformation of small and large bovine luteal cells: effect of gonadotropins and prostaglandins and dependence on luteal phase

Change in nuclear volume and chromatin conformation are generally considered to reflect altered gene expression in eukaryotic cells. The present studies were undertaken to investigate whether these nuclear parameters of luteal cells can be altered by hormone treatment in vitro or change during the estrous cycle. The nuclear volume of small luteal cells was significantly lower than that of large luteal cells during the cycle and pregnancy. The nuclear volumes of small and large luteal cells from pregnancy did not change during incubation without any hormone or with 10 nM prostaglandin (PG)F 2 alpha. However, incubation with 1 nM human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) or 10 nM PGE1 resulted in a significant increase of nuclear volume of small luteal cells by 4 h and that of large luteal cells by 6 h. Small luteal cells were more responsive to hCG than large luteal cells. The nuclear volumes of small and large luteal cells also significantly increased from early to mid luteal phase with no further change in late luteal phase. hCG and PGE1, as well as PGF2 alpha, treatment resulted in a change of chromatin conformation of small and large luteal cells. Dibutyryl cyclic AMP (10 mM) mimicked the hormones by increasing nuclear volumes and changing the chromatin conformation of small and large luteal cells. Chromatin conformation of small and large luteal cells also changed from early to mid luteal phase and mid to late luteal phase. In conclusion, in vitro, hCG and PGs can regulate nuclear volume and/or chromatin conformation of small as well as large bovine luteal cells.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The value of progesterone, oestradiol benzoate and cloprostenol in controlling the timing of oestrus and ovulation in dairy cows and allowing successful fixed-time insemination

The relative merits of three hormone treatments of dairy cows: (1) intravaginally administered progesterone and oestradiol benzoate; (2) intravaginally administered progesterone and injected cloprostenol; and (3) injected cloprostenol; begun 35-75 days after calving and designed to synchronize oestrus and ovulation and allow successful artificial insemination (AI) at fixed times, have been assessed utilizing information from progesterone concentrations in milk. From this it was concluded that 89% of the cows had ovulated one to three times between calving and the beginning of treatment. Treatment (2) was more effective than (1) in synchronizing ovulation. This was due to the fact that when treatments began early in the ovulation cycle, the requirement for a rapidly effective luteolytic agent was provided by cloprostenol but not by oestradiol benzoate. Treatment (2) was also more effective than (3) in synchronizing ovulation. This is interpreted as meaning that progesterone treatment for 12 days had a beneficial effect in restoring normal cyclic ovarian function in the cows after calving. Whilst cloprostenol administered alone did not have this beneficial effect, there is no evidence that it had a detrimental effect. Based on all cows in treatment groups, the proportion that became pregnant to the fixed-time AI was significantly greater after treatment (2) than after (1), but when based on numbers of cows with synchronized ovulation, there were no significant differences among treatments in the proportions becoming pregnant. The progesterone/cloprostenol treatment had a disadvantage in that when begun during the 11-22 day period of the ovulation cycle, so resulting in a long, total period of suppression of ovulation (mean, 32.1 days), fertility to the fixed-time AI was poor despite effective synchronization of ovulation. Ovulation cycles immediately following the failed, fixed-time AI were normal, both in length and in maximum, luteal-phase progesterone concentration and indicated normal corpus luteum function. Thus the infertility could be ascribed neither to poor timing of AI nor to gross degeneration of follicles prior to their synchronized ovulation following the prolonged suppression of ovulation. The 12-day progesterone treatments when given to anovulatory cows gave, within 5.5 h of their beginning, a concentration of progesterone in milk that was not significantly different from the maximum reached. This concentration declined during the 12 days of the treatment but remained above pretreatment level until 5.5 h after treatment withdrawal; the maximum reached was about half that in normal ovulation cycles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Comparison of methods for the synchronization of estrous cycles in dairy cows. 2. Effects of progesterone and parity on conception

Three experiments with 571 dairy cows indicated that significantly more primiparous cows given two prostaglandin F2 alpha injections 14 d apart conceived within 30 d of first AI than did cows given two injections 11 d apart (84 vs. 62%). Fewer multiparous cows given two injections 14 d apart and inseminated after estrus conceived than did cows given two injections and a progesterone intravaginal coil inserted 8 d after the first injection (42 vs. 66%). Fewer cows given one injection of prostaglandin and inseminated at estrus conceived than did cows given two injections 14 d apart and a progesterone coil (39 vs. 66%). Conception rates of cows given two prostaglandin injections were positively related to plasma progesterone concentrations 2 and 4 d before the second injection (r = .81 and .86). Cows with progesterone concentrations below 5 ng/ml, 2 d before the second prostaglandin injection, and synchronized by two prostaglandin injections or by two injections and a progesterone coil had conception rates of 36 and 63%, respectively. Cows with progesterone concentrations above 5 ng/ml had a conception rate of 75 and 46% in the two treatments, respectively. Conception after estrus synchronization depends on the method and on the plasma concentrations of progesterone. Progesterone coils may be used before AI to enhance fertility in cows with low progesterone concentrations.

Management of reproduction in dairy heifers based on the synchronization of estrous cycles

Israeli-Holstein breed dairy heifers (n=571), 13 to 15 mo old, were utilized in two experiments. In Experiment 1, the reproductive performance of synchronized heifers was compared with that of untreated controls. The heifers in both groups were inseminated following the detection of estrus. In Experiment 2, all heifers were synchronized and inseminated following the detection of estrus. Half of the animals in this experiment also received one or two fixed-time inseminations 72 and 96 h after the last synchronization treatment. Synchronization of estrous cycles was performed by two prostaglandin F2alpha (PG) injections given 12 d apart. In the control group of Experiment 1, observation of estrous behavior and insemination of heifers detected in estrus were carried out daily throughout the experiment. In the synchronized groups of Experiments 1 and in 2, the management of reproduction consisted of estrus detection followed by the insemination of heifers in estrus carried out only during 6 d of every 3 wk. Five days following the second PG injection, 86% of the heifers were detected in estrus, 71% of them at 49 to 96 h after treatment. In Experiment 1, age at first insemination, age at conception, and conception rate were, respectively, 425 d, 446 d and 54% in the control group vs 432 d (P<0.02), 449 d and 62% in the PG-treated group. In Experiment 2, the respective figures were 436 d, 462 d and 59% in the group inseminated following the detection of estrus vs 427 d (P<0.002), 464 d and 51% (P<0.05) in the group in which heifers were inseminated at estrus and also received one or two fixed-time inseminations.

Conception rates and calving intervals after prostaglandin F2 alpha or prebreeding progesterone in dairy cows

Two experiments were performed in two different herds to determine if utilizing prostaglandin F 2 alpha to induce estrus for first services would be effective in reducing the duration and variability of calving intervals. In Experiment 1, cows were assigned randomly as controls (n = 217) to be inseminated as they were detected in estrus (beginning d 42 to 53 postpartum depending on replicate) or treated with prostaglandin F2 alpha (n = 185). In Experiment 2, the same treatments were utilized, except control cows (n = 124) were inseminated at their first detected estrus after d 40 postpartum, and treated cows received either one injection of prostaglandin F2 alpha between d 54 and 63 (n = 116) or were given progesterone (via a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device) for 7 d, with the device removed 24 h after prostaglandin F2 alpha (n = 116). More cows were inseminated and pregnancy rates were higher within 5 d after treatment with prostaglandin F2 alpha, and interval from prostaglandin F2 alpha to first service was reduced compared with that of control cows. Duration and variation of calving intervals were unaffected in either experiment, despite the fact the elective waiting period was 6 to 23 d longer for treated cows than for controls. Prebreeding treatment with progesterone failed to improve conception rates, but the efficiency of estrous expression increased from 54% in prostaglandin F2 alpha-treated cows to 71% in those cows also receiving prebreeding progesterone. We conclude that prostaglandin F2 alpha was ineffective in improving reproductive performance of these herds under good herd management. However, prostaglandin F2 alpha offers the convenience of inseminating small groups of cows, controlling when breedings occur during the work week, and prolonging the elective waiting period without extending the calving interval.

Enhanced precision of estrus and luteinizing hormone after progesterone and prostaglandin in heifers

Objectives were to determine if low progesterone and increased basal luteinizing hormone for 3 d after injecting prostaglandin F2 alpha would affect precision of preovulatory surges of luteinizing hormone and onset of estrus in Holstein heifers. In experiments 1 and 2, heifers received progesterone devices for 10 d and prostaglandin F2 alpha on the 7th d after inserting progesterone device. For controls, progesterone devices were removed when prostaglandin F2 alpha was injected, and control devices were installed for 3 d. In experiment 1, jugular blood was sampled every 2 or 4 h from injection of prostaglandin F2 alpha until 108 h after removing progesterone to determine basal and peak secretion of luteinizing hormone. In treatment heifers, basal luteinizing hormone tended to increase, and intervals to peak secretion of luteinizing hormone were shorter and more precise than for controls. In experiment 2, heifers were observed for estrus for 30 min every 4 h for 96 h after removing progesterone devices. Intervals to onset of estrus for experimental heifers were shorter and more precise than for controls. After exogenous prostaglandin F2 alpha, 1 to 2 ng of progesterone per milliliter of serum for 2 to 3 d allows increased basal luteinizing hormone and is associated with increased precision of preovulatory secretion of luteinizing hormone and onset of estrus. This may be an acceptable method to control ovulation precisely for fixed time insemination of cattle.

Enhanced reproduction and its economic implications

Reproductive performance affects profit of dairy herds because it directly affects milk produced per cow per day, number of replacements produced, and rates of voluntary and involuntary culling. High producing cows will reproduce at a satisfactory rate if they are managed properly. There appears to be direct relationship between herd management and reproductive performance. Thus, reproductive performance and profit respond positively to improvements of rates of detection of estrus, improvements of rates of conception, and improvements of management of the periparturient cow. Pharmacological procedures are now available for controlling time of estrus and insemination in groups of cattle. It is feasible to limit the breeding period in a herd to 1 wk of each 3-wk interval. Primary benefits of controlled breeding are convenience and efficient use of labor for detection of estrus and insemination. Biotechnical procedures such as embryo transfer and insertion of specific genes may enhance rates of genetic improvement for important economic traits.

Estrus synchronization and pregnancy rates in cyclic and noncyclic beef cows and heifers treated with syncro-mate B or Norgestomet and Alfaprostol

Postpartum lactating cows (N=118) and virgin heifers (N=60) were treated with subcutaneous Norgestomet implants for nine days and received either an intramuscular injection (im) of 5 mg estradiol valerate and 3 mg Norgestomet at the time of implant insertion or an im injection of 5 mg Alfaprostol 24 hr before implant removal. Animals were artificially inseminated 12 hr after detection of estrus. Of the cows and heifers, 78% and 88%, respectively, were in estrus within five days after implant removal (P<0.09). There was no difference between treatments in the proportion of animals in estrus or in the timing of estrus (P<0.85). Estrus was detected in a greater (P<0.05) proportion of animals that were cyclic prior to treatment (88%) than among those that were anestrous prior to treatment (77%). Pregnancy rates after five days were similar between heifers that were cyclic (42%) or anestrous (47%) prior to treatment; however, the five-day pregnancy rate in cows that were anestrous prior to treatment was 38% lower than that in cows that were cyclic prior to treatment (17 vs 55%, P<0.01). Although the treatments synchronized or induced estrus in both cyclic and anestrous animals, marked variability in estrous response and fertility among previously cyclic or anestrous postpartum cows limited the effectiveness of the treatments.