European public health policies for managing contacts of invasive meningococcal disease cases better harmonised in 2013 than in 2007

Public health management of invasive meningococcal disease outbreaks: worldwide 1973-2018, a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Infectious disease outbreaks are an ongoing public health concern, requiring extensive resources to prevent and manage. Invasive Meningococcal Disease (IMD) is a severe outcome of infection with Neisseria meningitidis bacteria, which can be carried and transmitted asymptomatically. IMD is not completely vaccine-preventable, presenting an ongoing risk of outbreak development. This review provides a retrospective assessment of public health management of IMD outbreaks.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in PubMed and EMBASE. English-language studies reporting on IMD outbreaks and associated public health response were considered eligible. Reporting on key characteristics including outbreak size, duration, location, and public health response were assessed against Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology guidelines. A summary of lessons learned and author recommendations for each article were also discussed.

RESULTS

39 eligible studies were identified, describing 35 outbreaks in seven regions. Responses to outbreaks were mostly reactive, involving whole communities over prioritising those at highest risk of transmission. Recent responses identified a need for more proactive and targeted controls. Reporting was inconsistent, with key characteristics such as outbreak size, duration, or response absent or incompletely described.

CONCLUSION

There is a need for clear, comprehensive reporting on IMD outbreaks and their public health response to inform policy and practice for subsequent outbreaks of IMD and other infectious diseases.

Epidemiology and genetic diversity of invasive Neisseria meningitidis strains circulating in Portugal from 2003 to 2020

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) continues to be a public health problem due to its epidemic potential, affecting mostly children. We aimed to present a detailed description of the epidemiology of IMD in Portugal, including insights into the genetic diversity of Neisseria meningitidis strains. Epidemiological analysis included data from the Portuguese National Reference Laboratory of Neisseria meningitidis during 2003 to 2020. Since 2012, N. meningitidis isolates have also been assessed for their susceptibility to antibiotics and were characterized by whole genome sequencing. During 2003-2020, 1392 confirmed cases of IMD were analyzed. A decrease in the annual incidence rate was observed, ranging from 1.99 (2003) to 0.39 (2020), with an average case fatality rate of 7.1%. Serogroup B was the most frequent (69.7%), followed by serogroups C (9.7%), Y (5.7%), and W (2.6%). Genomic characterization of 329 isolates identified 20 clonal complexes (cc), with the most prevalent belonging to serogroup B cc41/44 (26.3%) and cc213 (16.3%). Isolates belonging to cc11 were predominantly from serogroups W (77.3%) and C (76.5%), whereas cc23 was dominant from serogroup Y (65.7%). Over the past 4 years (2017-2020), we observed an increasing trend of cases assigned to cc213, cc32, and cc11. Regarding antimicrobial susceptibility, all isolates were susceptible to ceftriaxone and 61.8% were penicillin-nonsusceptible, whereas 1.4% and 1.0% were resistant to ciprofloxacin and rifampicin. This is the first detailed study on the epidemiology and genomics of invasive N. meningitidis infections in Portugal, providing relevant data to public health policy makers for a more effective control of this disease.

Emergence of ciprofloxacin- and penicillin-resistant Neisseria meningitidis isolates in Japan between 2003 and 2020 and its genetic features

Although we previously reported that some meningococcal isolates in Japan were resistant to penicillin (PCG) and ciprofloxacin (CIP), the antibiotic susceptibilities of Neisseria meningitidis isolates obtained in Japan remained unclear. In the present study, 290 N. meningitidis isolates in Japan between 2003 and 2020 were examined for the sensitivities to eight antibiotics (azithromycin, ceftriaxone, ciprofloxacin, chloramphenicol, meropenem, minocycline, penicillin, and rifampicin). All isolates were susceptible to chloramphenicol, ceftriaxone, meropenem, minocycline, and rifampicin while two were resistant to azithromycin. Penicillin- and ciprofloxacin-resistant and -intermediate isolates (PCGR, CIPR, PCGI and CIPI, respectively) were also identified. Based on our previous findings from whole genome sequence analysis, approximately 40% of PCGI were associated with ST-11026 and cc2057 meningococci, both of which were unique to Japan. Moreover, the majority of ST-11026 meningococci were CIPR or CIPI. Sensitivities to PCG and CIP were closely associated with genetic features, which indicated that, at least for Japanese meningococcal isolates, PCGR/I or CIPI/R would be less likely to be horizontally conferred from other neisserial genomes by transferring of the genes responsible (penA and gyrA genes, respectively), but rather that ancestral N. meningitidis strains conferring PCGR/I or CIPI/R phenotypes clonally disseminated in Japan.

A systematic review and meta-analysis on the antibiotic resistance of Neisseria meningitidis in the last 20 years in the world

BACKGROUND

Neisseria meningitidis is one of the most important causes of meningitis and pathogens-associated deaths in developing and developed countries. Effective anti-microbial agents are pivotal to treat and control N. meningitidis infections. The aim of the present study was to systematically review published studies on the antibiotic resistance of N. meningitidis in the last 20 years (2000-2020) in the world.

METHODS

Published researches were identified through a literature search using reputable databases including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Finally, 24 studies were included for a random-effects model meta-analysis.

RESULTS

The overall resistance to most commonly used antibiotics such as ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, ciprofloxacin and rifampin was low, ranging from 1 to 3.4%. However, non-sensitivity to penicillin, as the first-line antibiotic against N. meningitidis, was higher (27.2%). Altogether, the resistance to the first-line antibiotics (except penicillin) is still low indicating these drugs are effective against meningococcal meningitis. We also found a significant gap between MIC and disk diffusion for evaluating resistance to antibiotics in which disk diffusion overestimate the resistance rate.

CONCLUSIONS

To properly management and prevent the spread of N. miningitidis isolates resistant antibiotics, it is necessary to monitor the pattern of antibiotic susceptibility regionally and globally using the MIC methods.

Lessons for and from the COVID-19 pandemic response - An appraisal of guidance for the public health management of Invasive Meningococcal Disease

BACKGROUND

COVID-19 has focussed public attention on the management of communicable disease like never before. Surveillance, contact tracing, and case management are recognised as key components of outbreak prevention. Development of guidance for COVID-19 has drawn from existing management of other communicable diseases, including Invasive Meningococcal Disease (IMD). IMD is a rare but severe outcome of Neisseria meningitidis infection that can be prevented through vaccination. Cases still occur sporadically, requiring ongoing surveillance and consistent management. To this end, national and international public health agencies have developed and published guidance for identification and management of IMD cases.

AIM

To assess national and international guidelines for the public health management of IMD, with a focus on the recommendations for identification and management of "close contacts" to IMD cases.

METHODS

Guidelines from six national and international public health agencies were assessed using a modified version of the Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) Instrument in four key domains: stakeholder involvement, developmental rigour, clarity, and applicability. A direct comparison of terminology and recommendations for identification and management of close contacts to IMD cases was also conducted.

RESULTS

Guidelines from Europe and the United Kingdom rated most highly using the AGREE II Instrument, both presenting a clear, critical assessment of the strength of the available evidence, and the risks, costs, and benefits behind recommendations for management of close contacts. Direct comparison of guidelines identified inconsistencies in the language defining close contacts to IMD cases.

CONCLUSION

Discrepancies between guidelines could be due to limited evidence concerning mechanisms behind disease transmission, along with the lack of a consistent process for development and review of guideline recommendations. COVID-19 management has demonstrated that international collaboration for development of public health guidance is possible, a practice that should be extended to management of other communicable diseases.

Recent changes of invasive meningococcal disease in France: arguments to revise the vaccination strategy in view of those of other countries

In France, the incidence of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) is around 1/100,000, with the following trends over the 2011-2018 period: a leading role of group B in subjects <15 years, a decrease of group C among <1 year since 2017, an increase of group W in all age groups including subjects <1 year since 2014 and a positive correlation between group Y and age group. In Europe, vaccination progressed with conjugate ACWY vaccines and proteins-based B vaccines. Their benefit-risk-cost balance is however not so obvious for area at low incidence (<2/100,000), explaining tremendous variations between countries, from no recommendation to recommend all available vaccines. In France, the calendar still includes only C with a good adhesion in infants but a fiasco of the catch-up campaign in adolescents and young adults. In Europe, it is time to consider not only national epidemiology but also trends in the neighborhood. The increase of group W cases encourages switching C to ACWY vaccine both in infants and adolescents. It is also time to protect infants with B vaccine. Large pedagogy on the disease is required to increase the adhesion to the vaccination and to recognize and treat earlier the residual cases.

Susceptibility of invasive Neisseria meningitidis strains isolated in Germany to azithromycin, an alternative agent for post-exposure prophylaxis

Background

Post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) for close contacts of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) cases is recommended in most countries to avoid secondary cases by eradicating supposed meningococcal colonization. Currently, rifampicin, ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone are recommended in many countries including Germany. Azithromycin has been shown to eradicate meningococcal colonization.

Objectives

To assess the azithromycin susceptibility of invasive Neisseria meningitidis isolates.

Methods

A subset of German invasive meningococcal isolates from 2006–18 was selected for this study. Azithromycin MIC was determined using broth microdilution and agar gradient diffusion.

Results

Azithromycin MICs as determined by broth microdilution ranged from &lt;0.003 to 2 mg/L (median 0.50 mg/L, Q75 1 mg/L). All isolates were susceptible to azithromycin according to the CLSI breakpoint (95% CI 0.0%–1.5%). There was no significant correlation between MICs determined by broth microdilution and agar gradient diffusion. Nevertheless, the two methods were consistent regarding the categorization of all isolates as susceptible.

Conclusions

Azithromycin is an eligible antibiotic for PEP of IMD close contacts. It is approved for adults as well as children and may even be used in pregnancy. Because of easier application and lower toxicity, it might be an alternative to rifampicin and ciprofloxacin, as we found no resistant isolates. Since a gonococcal gene associated with elevated azithromycin MICs has been reported in N. meningitidis, careful monitoring of the emergence of resistant strains is nevertheless necessary for meningococci. Lack of concordance of MICs between broth microdilution and agar gradient diffusion needs to be considered.

Management of meningococcal outbreaks: are we using the same language? Comparison of the public health policies between high-income countries with low incidence of meningococcal disease

BACKGROUND

Invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) in high-income countries usually occurs sporadically with low incidence and occasionally as small clusters or outbreaks. The WHO guidelines (GLs) for IMD outbreak applies only to African countries with high endemic incidence. Several high-income countries developed their own GLs on IMD outbreak, and we compare their terminology, classification, definitions, and public health interventions.

METHODS

National IMD outbreak GLs of the European Union and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development member states were compared. Due to linguistic barriers, 17 out of forty-one countries were selected, and the GLs on the websites of the national health authorities were independently screened by two researchers.

RESULTS

National GLs on IMD outbreak were available for 12 countries. All GLs classify IMD outbreak into organization and community based using different terminology (cluster, epidemic, etc.). Two GLs introduce also a third condition of hyperendemic. Definitions, thresholds, and countermeasures vary among countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Different definitions of organization and community-based outbreaks and countermeasures are expected because of uncertainties about their effectiveness, and differences between countries in health-care systems and public health policy approaches. Nevertheless, variations in terminology, definitions and countermeasures are confusing and reflect the need for an international standardization.

Mass chemoprophylaxis for control of outbreaks of meningococcal disease

Although vaccination is the main strategy used to control meningococcal disease outbreaks, mass chemoprophylaxis has also been used as an immediate response to outbreaks, either to supplement vaccination or when vaccination is not possible. However, public health guidelines regarding the use of mass chemoprophylaxis for outbreak control vary by country, partly because the impact of mass chemoprophylaxis on the course of an individual outbreak is difficult to assess. We have reviewed data for the use of mass chemoprophylaxis during 33 outbreaks that occurred both in military populations and in communities and non-military organisations. In most outbreaks, no additional cases of meningococcal disease occurred after mass chemoprophylaxis, or cases occurred only in individuals who had not received prophylaxis. A delay of several weeks was common before cases occurred among prophylaxis recipients. Overall, the outbreak reports that we reviewed suggest that mass chemoprophylaxis might provide temporary protection to chemoprophylaxis recipients during outbreaks.

Invasive Meningococcal Disease on the Workplaces: a systematic review

Background and aims of the work: Invasive Meningococcal Disease (IMD) represents a global health threat, and occupational settings have the potential to contribute to its spreading. Therefore, here we present the available evidences on the epidemiology of IMD on the workplaces.

METHODS

The following key words were used to explore PubMed: Neisseria meningitidis, meningococcus, meningococcal, invasive meningococcal disease, epidemiology, outbreaks, profession(al), occupation(al).

RESULTS

We identified a total of 12 IMD cases among healthcare workers (HCW), 44 involving biological laboratory workers (BLW), 8 among school personnel, and eventually 27 from other settings, including 3 large industrial working populations. Eventual prognosis of BLW, particularly the case/fatality ratio, was dismal. As clustered in time and space, data about school cases as well as industrial cases seem to reflect community rather than occupational outbreaks. In general, we identified a common pattern for HCW and BLW, i.e. the exposure to droplets or aerosol containing N meningitidis in absence of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) and/or microbiological safety devices (MSD) (e.g. cabinets). Post-exposure chemoprophylaxis (PEC) was rarely reported by HCW (16.7%) workers, and never by BLW. Data regarding vaccination status were available only for a case, who had failed requested boosters.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk for occupational transmission of IMD appears relatively low, possibly as a consequence of significant reporting bias, with the exception of HCW and BLW. Improved preventive measures should be implemented in these occupational groups, in order to improve the strict use of PPE and MSD, and the appropriate implementation of PEC.

Strong Public Health Recommendations from Weak Evidence? Lessons Learned in Developing Guidance on the Public Health Management of Meningococcal Disease

The evidence underpinning public health policy is often of low quality, leading to inconsistencies in recommended interventions. One example is the divergence in national policies across Europe for managing contacts of invasive meningococcal disease. Aiming to develop consistent guidance at the European level, a group of experts reviewed the literature and formulated recommendations. The group defined eight priority research questions, searched the literature, and formulated recommendations using GRADE methodology. Five of the research questions are discussed in this paper. After taking into account quality of evidence, benefit, harm, value, preference, burden on patient of the intervention, and resource implications, we made four strong recommendations and five weak recommendations for intervention. Strong recommendations related not only to one question with very low quality of evidence as well as to two questions with moderate to high quality of evidence. The weak recommendations related to two questions with low and very low quality of evidence but also to one question with moderate quality of evidence. GRADE methodology ensures a transparent process and explicit recognition of additional factors that should be considered when making recommendations for policy. This approach can be usefully applied to many areas of public health policy where evidence quality is often low.