Antimicrobial prescribing in long-term care facilities: a nationwide point-prevalence study, Slovenia, 2016

Impact of antimicrobial stewardship implementation on the antibiotic use and susceptibility in a Japanese long-term care hospital

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial use (AMU) is closely related to the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant (AMR) bacteria. Meanwhile, long-term care hospitals (LTCHs) have been pointed out to be important reservoirs for AMR. However, evidence illustrating the association between AMU and AMR in LTCHs is lacking compared to that of acute care hospitals.

METHODS

We evaluated the impact of an antimicrobial stewardship (AS) program implementation, in a LTCH on AMU and antibiotic susceptibility between three periods: the pre-AS-period (pre-AS); the first period after AS implementation (post-AS 1), in which initiated recommendation the blood culture collection and definitive therapy by AS team; and the second period (post-AS 2), implementation of a balanced use of antibiotics was added.

RESULTS

After the AS implementation, a significant increase in the number of blood cultures collected was observed. Conversely, the AMU of piperacillin-tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ), which has activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was increased and occupied 43.0% of all injectable AMU in post-AS 1 compared with that in pre-AS (35.5%). In the post-AS 2 period, we analyzed the %AUD and recommended hospital-wide PIPC/TAZ sparing; this resulted in the significant reduction in %AUD of PIPC/TAZ, which was associated with improved susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to PIPC/TAZ.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that AS programs aimed at implementing antibiotic sparing may lead to improve AMR, highlighting the necessity of correcting overuse of a single class of antibiotics and usefulness of AMU monitoring in the LTCH setting.

Self-isolation of an Italian long-term care facility during COVID-19 pandemic: A comparison study on care-related infectious episodes

The aim of this retrospective cohort study is to understand if and how much the preventive self-isolation approach might have been a valid model to avoid care-related infection, not only from COVID-19 but also from other non-viral infectious diseases. From March to May 2020, the healthcare and management staff of the Villa Santa Maria long-term care facilities, located in the village of Montenero di Bisaccia (Campobasso, Molise, Italy), decided to carry out a preventive self-isolation plan to safeguard the residents from SARS-CoV-2. The impact on other infectious diseases was evaluated by analyzing the antibiotic therapies prescription trend among the inpatients. Our data showed that although self-isolation protected residents and caregivers from SARS-CoV-2, it can also be associated with mobility reduction, leading to an increase in bedridden pathologies, namely, pressure ulcers and pressure sores. The simultaneous isolation of residents and caregivers in the same location significantly reduced any outside influence as a cause of possible infections.

Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli recovered from respiratory and blood specimens from adults: the ATLAS surveillance program in European hospitals, 2018-2020

The population of people ≥65 years of age is increasing in Europe. Pneumonia is a prominent cause of infection in this age group. These patients may be at heightened risk of infection caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms owing to their frequent and prolonged contact with healthcare facilities as well as frequent exposure to antimicrobials and medical devices. However, ATLAS surveillance data did not demonstrate any difference in the incidence of MDR Gram-negative pathogens among patients ≥65 years of age and those aged <65 years. Higher rates of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa were observed in patients aged 18-64 years (10.7% and 32.3%, respectively) than in patients aged ≥65 years (5.0% and 25.4%, respectively). Significant therapeutic gaps were identified for CRE, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (65.9% of isolates tested) and MDR P. aeruginosa, which continue to be prevalent in European hospitals. Among the antimicrobials evaluated, only colistin provided >75% in vitro coverage for these pathogens.

Antibiotic use for respiratory tract infections among older adults living in long-term care facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antibiotics are commonly prescribed for respiratory tract infections (RTIs) among older adults in long-term care facilities (LTCFs), and this contributes to the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to determine the antibiotic prescribing rate for RTIs among LTCF residents, and to analyse the antibiotic consumption patterns with the AwaRe monitoring tool, developed by the World Health Organization.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched from inception to March 2022. Original articles reporting antibiotic use for RTIs in LTCFs were included in this review. Study quality was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute's Critical Appraisal Checklist for Prevalence Data. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed to calculate the pooled estimates. Subgroup analysis was conducted by type of RTI, country, and study start year.

RESULTS

In total, 47 articles consisting of 50 studies were included. The antibiotic prescribing rate ranged from 21.5% to 100% (pooled estimate 69.8%, 95% confidence interval 55.2-82.6%). The antibiotic prescribing rate for lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) was higher than the rates for viral and general RTIs. Compared with Italy, France and the USA, the Netherlands had lower antibiotic use for LRTIs. A proportion of viral RTIs were treated with antibiotics, and all the antibiotics were from the Watch group. Use of antibiotics in the Access group was higher in the Netherlands, Norway, Switzerland and Slovenia compared with the USA and Australia.

CONCLUSION

The antibiotic prescribing rate for RTIs in LTCFs was high, and AWaRe antibiotic use patterns varied by type of RTI and country. Improving antibiotic use may require coordination efforts.

Prevalence of Antimicrobial Prescribing in Long-Term Care Facilities in a Local Health Authority of Northern Italy

BACKGROUND

Almost half of antimicrobial prescriptions in long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is inappropriate. This broad use might represent a strong contributor to antimicrobial resistance in these facilities. This study aimed to assess antibiotic use patterns and potential associated factors with a survey of LTCFs in the local health authority (LHA) of Novara.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 25 LTCFs in the LHA of Novara following the healthcare-associated infection in LCTFs (HALT) protocol. Information on residents and facilities was assessed. Antibiotic usage and potential determinants were also estimated.

RESULTS

In total, 1137 patients were screened for antibiotic usage. Mean age was 84.58 years (SD 9.77), and the majority were female (76.52%). Twenty-six were antibiotic users (prevalence rate 2.29%, 95%CI 1.50-3.33). Antimicrobials were mainly prescribed orally (84.62%). Potential risk factors for antibiotic prescription were catheter use (central and peripheral venous, p-values 0.0475 and 0.0034, respectively, and urinary, p-value 0.0008), immobilization (p-value < 0.0001), and sex (p-value 0.0486).

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified a low prevalence of antimicrobic consumption in LTCFs. Further surveillance studies are warranted to identify trends and changes in pathogen incidence and antimicrobial resistance and to inform public health authorities on the necessity of prudent use of antimicrobials in LCTFs.

An evaluation of the evidence brief for policy development process in WHO EVIPNet Europe countries

BACKGROUND

Evidence briefs for policy (EBPs) represent a potentially powerful tool for supporting evidence-informed policy-making. Since 2012, WHO Evidence-Informed Policy Network (EVIPNet) Europe has been supporting Member States in developing EBPs. The aim of this study was to evaluate the process of developing EBPs in Estonia, Hungary and Slovenia.

METHODS

We used a rapid appraisal approach, combining semi-structured interviews and document review, guided by the Medical Research Council (MRC) process evaluation framework. Interviews were conducted with a total of 20 individuals familiar with the EBP process in the three study countries. Data were analysed thematically, and emerging themes were related back to the MRC framework components (implementation, mechanisms of impact, and context). We also reflected on the appropriateness of this evaluation approach for EVIPNet teams without evaluation research expertise to conduct themselves.

RESULTS

The following themes emerged as important to the EBP development process: how the focus problem is prioritized, who initiates this process, EBP team composition, EBP team leadership, availability of external support in the process, and the culture of policy-making in a country. In particular, the EBP process seemed to be supported by early engagement of the Ministry of Health and other stakeholders as initiators, clear EBP team roles and expectations, including a strong leader, external support to strengthen EBP team capacity and cultural acceptance of the necessity of evidence-informed policy-making. Overall, the evaluation approach was considered feasible by the EBP teams and captured rich qualitative data, but may be limited by the absence of external reviewers and long lag times between the EBP process and the evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

This process occurs in a complex system and must be conceptualized in each country and each EBP project in a way that fits local policy-making culture, priorities, leadership and team styles, roles and available resources. The use of a rapid appraisal approach, combining qualitative interviews and document review, is a feasible method of process evaluation for EVIPNet member countries.

Healthcare-associated infections and antibiotic use in long-term care residents from two geographical regions in Switzerland

BACKGROUND

The burden of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs) and antimicrobial use in Swiss long-term care facilities (LTCFs) is currently unknown. This study assessed the prevalence of HAIs and antibiotic use among LTCF residents in Switzerland.

METHODS

A point-prevalence study was undertaken in LTCFs in eastern and western Switzerland from August to October 2019 according to the 'Healthcare-associated infections in long-term care facilities' (HALT) protocol. Characteristics of residents (age, sex, wounds, dementia, indwelling catheters) and institutions (specific factors, geographic region) were assessed. LTCF residents were screened for HAIs and current antibiotic treatment. Personal and institutional factors associated with HAIs were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 1185 residents from 16 LTCFs (eight per geographic region) were screened for HAIs and antibiotic treatment. Median age was 87 years (interquartile range 79-91) and 71% were female. The prevalence of HAIs was 4.2% (west 4.3% vs east 4.2%; P=0.93), with mucocutaneous skin infections (36%) and respiratory tract infections (30%) being the most common. Independent risk factors for the presence of HAIs were presence of a chronic wound [odds ratio (OR) 2.4, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-5.0; P=0.02] and being immobile (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.0-3.3; P=0.04). Antibiotics were given to 2.9% of residents (west 3.9% vs east 1.8%; P=0.05) on the day of the survey. The most commonly prescribed antibiotics were amoxicillin-clavulanic acid and quinolones.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of HAIs in Swiss LTCFs is similar to that in other European countries, whereas antibiotic consumption is lower. Further point-prevalence surveys on a broader scale are recommended to improve understanding of the burden of HAIs and antibiotic consumption in this setting.

Temporal and regional trends of antibiotic use in long-term aged care facilities across 39 countries, 1985-2019: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Antibiotic misuse is a key contributor to antimicrobial resistance and a concern in long-term aged care facilities (LTCFs). Our objectives were to: i) summarise key indicators of systemic antibiotic use and appropriateness of use, and ii) examine temporal and regional variations in antibiotic use, in LTCFs (PROSPERO registration CRD42018107125).

METHODS & FINDINGS

Medline and EMBASE were searched for studies published between 1990-2021 reporting antibiotic use rates in LTCFs. Random effects meta-analysis provided pooled estimates of antibiotic use rates (percentage of residents on an antibiotic on a single day [point prevalence] and over 12 months [period prevalence]; percentage of appropriate prescriptions). Meta-regression examined associations between antibiotic use, year of measurement and region. A total of 90 articles representing 78 studies from 39 countries with data between 1985-2019 were included. Pooled estimates of point prevalence and 12-month period prevalence were 5.2% (95% CI: 3.3-7.9; n = 523,171) and 62.0% (95% CI: 54.0-69.3; n = 946,127), respectively. Point prevalence varied significantly between regions (Q = 224.1, df = 7, p<0.001), and ranged from 2.4% (95% CI: 1.9-2.7) in Eastern Europe to 9.0% in the British Isles (95% CI: 7.6-10.5) and Northern Europe (95% CI: 7.7-10.5). Twelve-month period prevalence varied significantly between regions (Q = 15.1, df = 3, p = 0.002) and ranged from 53.9% (95% CI: 48.3-59.4) in the British Isles to 68.3% (95% CI: 63.6-72.7) in Australia. Meta-regression found no association between year of measurement and antibiotic use prevalence. The pooled estimate of the percentage of appropriate antibiotic prescriptions was 28.5% (95% CI: 10.3-58.0; n = 17,245) as assessed by the McGeer criteria. Year of measurement was associated with decreasing appropriateness of antibiotic use over time (OR:0.78, 95% CI: 0.67-0.91). The most frequently used antibiotic classes were penicillins (n = 44 studies), cephalosporins (n = 36), sulphonamides/trimethoprim (n = 31), and quinolones (n = 28).

CONCLUSIONS

Coordinated efforts focusing on LTCFs are required to address antibiotic misuse in LTCFs. Our analysis provides overall baseline and regional estimates for future monitoring of antibiotic use in LTCFs.

Prevalence and Risk Factors for Multidrug-Resistant Organisms Colonization in Long-Term Care Facilities Around the World: A Review

Elderly people confined to chronic care facilities face an increased risk of acquiring infections by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). This review presents the current knowledge of the prevalence and risk factors for colonization by MDROs in long-term care facilities (LTCF), thereby providing a useful reference to establish objectives for implementing successful antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs). We searched in PubMed and Scopus for studies examining the prevalence of MDROs and/or risk factors for the acquisition of MDROs in LTCF. One hundred and thirty-four studies published from 1987 to 2020 were included. The prevalence of MDROs in LTCF varies between the different continents, where Asia reported the highest prevalence of extended-spectrum ß-lactamase (ESBL) Enterobacterales (71.6%), carbapenem resistant (CR) Enterobacterales (6.9%) and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) (25.6%) and North America the highest prevalence to MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa (5.4%), MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (15.0%), vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus spp. (VRE) (4.0%), and Clostridioides difficile (26.1%). Furthermore, MDRO prevalence has experienced changes over time, with increases in MDR P. aeruginosa and extended spectrum ß-lactamase producing Enterobacterales observed starting in 2015 and decreases of CR Enterobacterales, MDR A. baumannii, VRE, MRSA and C. difficile. Several risk factors have been found, such as male sex, chronic wounds, the use of medical devices, and previous antibiotic use. The last of these aspects represents one of the most important modifiable factors for reducing colonization with MDROs through implementing ASPs in LTCF.

Changes of antibiotic prescribing pattern and its resistance to E. Coli in South Korea: a 12-year retrospective observational study

In the present study, we investigated the pattern of changes in antibiotic prescription and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Escherichia coli in South Korea between 2007 and 2018. We collected data related to antibiotic prescription and AMR in E. coli from the national surveillance system. We used the Mann–Kendall test and Spearman’s correlation to identify the trends of antibiotic prescription and AMR in E. coli and to examine the relationship between them, respectively. Although we noted a significant decreasing trend of ampicillin and gentamicin prescriptions in all medical institutions, we identified a higher level of AMR in long-term care facilities than in other medical institutions. We did not identify a significant positive correlation between ampicillin and gentamicin prescriptions and their resistance in E. coli. However, we found a significant positive correlation between cefotaxime prescription and its resistance in E. coli in hospitals, long-term care facilities, and clinics. Our results strongly suggest that long-term care facilities in South Korea have the potential to sustain AMR epidemics and that more efforts are needed to curb AMR in E. coli. Further epidemiological studies using enhanced AMR surveillance are warranted.

Antibiotic Use Among Residents Receiving Skilled Nursing Care in 29 U.S. Nursing Homes

BACKGROUND

Data describing antibiotic use in U.S. nursing homes remain limited. We report antibiotic use among skilled nursing facility residents from 29 U.S. nursing homes and assessed correlations between antibiotics prescribed to residents in skilled care and nursing home characteristics.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Twenty-nine U.S. nursing homes in the same healthcare corporation.

PARTICIPANTS

Residents receiving skilled care in 2016.

MEASUREMENTS

We used pharmacy invoice and nursing home census data to calculate the days of antibiotic therapy per 1,000 days of skilled care (1,000 DOSC), the rate of antibiotic starts per 1,000 DOSC, the length of antibiotic therapy, and the average antibiotic spectrum index. We also assessed correlations between antibiotic use and nursing home characteristics.

RESULTS

Antibiotics accounted for an average of 9.6% (±0.6%) of systemic medications prescribed among residents receiving skilled care. On average, 26.8% (±2.9%) of antibiotics were intravenous. Fluoroquinolones were prescribed at the highest rates (19% across all facilities), followed by beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (11%), first- and second-generation cephalosporins, sulfonamides, and oral tetracyclines (each at 9%). Both the proportion of residents using enrolled in Medicare and number of unique prescribers responsible for systemic prescriptions positively correlated with the rate of antibiotic starts.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that pharmacy invoices represent a useful and preexisting source of data for assessing antibiotic prescriptions among individuals receiving skilled nursing care. The correlation between the number of unique prescribers and antibiotic starts suggests that prescribers are central to efforts to improve antibiotic use in nursing homes.

Potential drug interactions with antibacterials in long-term care facilities analyzed by two interaction checkers

Background Residents in long-term care facilities take many medications concomitantly, including antibacterials, which increases the risk of drug-drug interactions. Objectives The aims of the study were to investigate the prevalence of severe potential interactions between antibacterials and other medications in Slovenian long-term care facilities and to compare the performance of two different drug-drug interaction checkers in these settings. Setting Residents in long-term care facilities in Slovenia. Method A point-prevalence study was conducted from April 2016 to June 2016. Residents' characteristics, antibacterial treatment, and concomitant medications were obtained from their medical charts. Potential drug-drug interactions were determined using Lexicomp Online™ 3.0.2 and the online Drugs.com Drug Interactions Checker. The study only included potential drug-drug interactions categorized as type MA (major interactions) by the Drugs.com checker and as type X (should be avoided) by Lexicomp Online™. The study calculated the differences in the number of type X and MA potential drug-drug interactions between different antibacterial classes and between the two drug-drug interactions checkers. Main outcome measure Number of medications per patient, number of potential drug-drug interactions with antibacterial, and differences between two drug-drug interactions checkers. Results Eighty (68.4%) of Slovenian general long-term care facilities with 13,032 residents responded to the invitation. 317 (2.4%) of the residents received antibacterial treatment and 212 residents were included in the analysis. On average, they received 10.9 medications (SD = 3.9). Antibacterials were involved in 24.1% type MA potential drug-drug interactions and 26.4% type X potential drug-drug interactions. A significant difference in the total number of potential drug-drug interaction between the two checkers was found for all antibacterials, co-trimoxazole and fluoroquinolones (p < 0.005). Type X and MA potential drug-drug interactions were more common with fluoroquinolones than with beta-lactams or co-trimoxazole (p < 0.005). Conclusion Potential interactions between antibacterials, especially fluoroquinolones and other drugs, were common in long-term care facility residents treated with antibacterials. Differences in the number of potential drug-drug interactions between the two checkers indicate that if available the use of several sources of information is recommended in clinical practice. The results call for a collaborative approach to address the risks of drug-drug interactions.