The quality of antimicrobial prescribing in acute care hospitals: results derived from a national point prevalence survey, Germany, 2016

An in-depth analysis of antimicrobial prescription quality in 10 non-university hospitals, in southwest Germany, 2021

BackgroundNon-university hospitals are the major provider of inpatient care in Germany, serving 89% of acute care hospital beds. Although surveillance data on antimicrobial use in hospitals are widely available, data on prescription quality are rare.AimWe aimed to provide an in-depth analysis of antimicrobial prescribing patterns and quality in southwest German non-university hospitals.MethodsDuring 2021, we performed three point prevalence surveys (PPS) in 10 non-university hospitals, representing ca 10% of hospital beds in the federal state of Baden-Württemberg (11 million inhabitants). Demographic and clinical information were collected. We assessed the overall performance of 14 validated process quality indicators (QI) covering infection diagnostics, antimicrobial therapy and documentation.ResultsOf 8,560 patients analysed, 2,861 (33%) received at least one antimicrobial. Most (2,789, 80%) antimicrobial prescriptions were for therapeutic indications. Most frequently prescribed agents were beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (1,120, 40%) in therapeutic and cefuroxime (269, 37%) in prophylactic indications. According to the World Health Organization's Access, Watch, Reserve classification, the Access-to-Watch ratio was 0.73. Overall adherence to QIs was low and varied substantially (27-93%), with documentation, possible streamlining and switching to oral therapy exhibiting the lowest fulfilment rates (< 50%).ConclusionThe results indicate a need to improve antimicrobial prescribing quality in non-university hospitals. The high prevalence of antimicrobial use in our setting underlines the demand for sustainable antimicrobial stewardship programmes in this sector. Our QI-based PPS approach can be used to identify key targets for future antimicrobial stewardship interventions. The results indicate a need for further legislation on antimicrobial stewardship.

A Retrospective, Longitudinal External Study of the robustness and reproducibility of National Antibacterial Prescribing Survey Data

BACKGROUND

Point prevalence surveys are used internationally to audit antibacterial use as well as the impact of interventions on improving prescribing and resistance rates. The annual National Antibacterial Prescribing Survey provides data on the appropriateness of antibacterial agent prescribing in Australian hospitals. Assessing the survey's robustness and result reproducibility is essential to its role in improving antibacterial prescribing practice.

AIM

To evaluate the reproducibility of internal assessments of antibacterial agent prescribing of both guideline compliance and appropriateness from a Western Australian hospital.

METHOD

Census data of 1051 prescriptions from 2013 to 2017 surveys were independently assessed for compliance based on Australian Therapeutic Guidelines - Antibiotics, and appropriateness, based on agent selection, therapy duration and microbiological test results. Concordance of these findings with internal hospital assessments was analysed.

RESULTS

This external study did not reproduce internal hospital audit results for compliance with guideline parameters. Non-compliant prescribing rate was significantly (p < 0.001) higher externally at 50.7% (533/1051) than internal assessment at 34.9% (367/1051). External analysis also found a significantly smaller proportion of prescriptions to be appropriate (551/1051, 52.4%) compared to internal analysis (745/1051, 70.9%) p < 0.001. Cohen's Kappa analysis found a moderate agreement for compliance (0.49) and appropriateness (0.50) between the external and internal evaluations.

CONCLUSION

The lack of adequate reproducibility of compliance and appropriateness assessments may limit the generalisability of the audit's results. Validating point prevalence surveys that assess antibacterial agent prescribing can increase confidence and improve reproducibility of their findings; as they provide important data for antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Antimicrobial Stewardship with and without Infectious Diseases Specialist Services to Improve Quality-of-Care in Secondary and Tertiary Care Hospitals in Germany: Study Protocol of the ID ROLL OUT Study

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs aim to secure the rational prescription of antibiotics through implementing department- or hospital-level activities. Infectious disease (ID) specialists improve the quality of care and outcomes in infection patients predominantly by individual consultations and patient-level interventions. While hospital AMS programs are established to various extents in Germany, ID specialist services are rarely available in this country. In the ID ROLL OUT study, we will implement and evaluate hospital-level AMS tools with and without ID specialist services in secondary and tertiary care hospitals. We aim to identify means to comprehensively and sustainably improve the quality of care of patients with infectious diseases.

METHODS

This project is a clustered, two-armed intervention study, which will be conducted in ten secondary and tertiary (non-university) care hospitals in Germany. The intervention groups are stratified by key characteristics of the hospitals. We will compare two interventional strategies: implementation of AMS teams and implementation of AMS teams combined with the activities of ID specialists (AMS + IDS).

PLANNED OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is the quality of care as measured in changes in a Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB) score (as an indicator of difficult-to-treat infections) and a community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) score (as an indicator of common infections) compared to a baseline pre-interventional period. Our secondary outcomes comprise patient- and hospital-level outcomes, such as the quality and frequency of antibiotic treatment, in-hospital mortality, duration of hospitalization, and C. difficile incidence (associated diarrhea episodes). The study may provide urgently needed key information for the aspired advancement of ID care in Germany.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

DRKS00023710 (registered on 9th April 2021).

Redundant Anaerobic Antimicrobial Prescriptions in German Acute Care Hospitals: Data from a National Point Prevalence Survey

Despite limited indications, redundant anaerobic antimicrobial prescriptions (RAAPs) are frequent. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of RAAPs in German acute care hospitals. In a retrospective data analysis, antimicrobial prescriptions from a point prevalence survey on antimicrobial use in German acute care hospitals in 2016 were analyzed and RAAPs were identified. RAAPs were defined as a patient simultaneously receiving any of the following combinations: Penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor (PenBLI) plus clindamycin; PenBLI plus metronidazole; PenBLI plus moxifloxacin; PenBLI plus carbapenem; carbapenem plus clindamycin; carbapenem plus metronidazole; carbapenem plus moxifloxacin; clindamycin plus metronidazole; clindamycin plus moxifloxacin; and metronidazole plus moxifloxacin. Data from 64,412 patients in 218 hospitals were included. Overall, 4486 patients (7%) received two or more antimicrobials. In total, 441 RAAP combinations were identified. PenBLI plus metronidazole was the most common anaerobic combination (N = 166, 38%). The majority of RAAPs were for the treatment of community-acquired (N = 258, 59%) infections. Lower respiratory tract infections (N = 77; 20%) and skin/soft tissue infections (N = 76; 20%) were the most frequently recorded types of infections. RAAPs are common in German hospitals. Reducing redundant antimicrobial coverage should be a key component of future antimicrobial stewardship activities.