1
|
Aghdassi SJS, Hansen S, Peña Diaz LA, Gropmann A, Saydan S, Geffers C, Gastmeier P, Piening B, Behnke M. Healthcare-Associated Infections and the Use of Antibiotics in German Hospitals—Results of the Point Prevalence Survey of 2022 and Comparison With Earlier Findings. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2024:arztebl.m2024.0033. [PMID: 38471129 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A national point prevalence survey (PPS) of healthcare-associated infections (HAI) and antibiotic use (AU) was carried out in Germany in 2022 in the framework of the European PPS conducted by the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). The objective was to determine the prevalence of HAI and AU in German hospitals and to compare the obtained values with those of the most recent previous PPS, which was carried out in 2016. METHODS The German National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections was entrusted with the organization of the PPS of 2022. As recommended by the ECDC, each hospital in a representative sample of 50 hospitals was invited to participate, and all other interested hospitals in Germany were also able to participate if desired. The data were collected by specially trained hospital staff in May, June, and July 2022. The definitions and methods put forth by the ECDC were used. RESULTS Data from 66 586 patients in 252 hospitals were included. The prevalence of HAI in all participating hospitals was 4.9%, and that of AU was 26.9%. The HAI and AU prevalences were essentially unchanged in comparison to 2016. The most common types of HAI were surgical site infection (23.5%), lower respiratory tract infection (21.6%), and urinary tract infection (19.0%). CONCLUSION HAI were just as frequent in 2022 as in 2016, affecting approximately one in twenty hospitalized patients on any given day.
Collapse
|
2
|
Eckmann C, Aghdassi SJS, Brinkmann A, Pletz M, Rademacher J. Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis—Indications and Modalities for the Prevention of Postoperative Wound Infection. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2024:arztebl.m2024.0037. [PMID: 38440828 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.m2024.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative surgical site infections (SSI) account for almost 25% of all nosocomial infections in Germany and are a source of increased morbidity and mortality. METHODS This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective search in PubMed and on national and international guidelines. RESULTS The individual risk factors for SSI must be assessed before any surgical procedure. A body-mass index above 30 kg/m2 is associated with an unadjusted risk ratio of 1.35 [1.28; 1.41] for SSI, which rises to 3.29 [2.99; 3.62] if the patient is also immunosuppressed. The risk of SSI is also significantly higher with certain types of procedure. Perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is clearly indicated for operations that carry a high risk of SSI (e.g., colorectal surgery) and for those that involve the implantation of alloplastic material (e.g., hip endoprostheses). PAP can usually be administered with basic antibiotics such as cefazoline. The basic principles of PAP are that it should be given by the anesthesia team in the interval from 60 minutes preoperatively up to shortly before the incision, and that its administration should only be for a short period of time, usually as a single shot. Continuing PAP onward into the postoperative period leads to increased toxicity, bacterial superinfections, and antibiotic resistance. CONCLUSION The evidence shows that perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis is a component of a bundle of measures that can help prevent SSI. Strict indications and adherence to the basic principles of PAP are essential for therapeutic success.
Collapse
|
3
|
Aghdassi SJS, Saydan S, Behnke M, Clausmeyer J, Gastmeier P, Geffers C. Surveillance of infections of surgical sites and lower respiratory tracts should be combined: experiences from the German surveillance module for operated patients (OP-KISS), 2018 to 2022. Euro Surveill 2024; 29:2300416. [PMID: 38487888 PMCID: PMC10941308 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2024.29.11.2300416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BackgroundSurveillance of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) of operated patients conventionally focuses on intubated patients in intensive care units (ICU). Post-operative immobilisation increases the risk of LRTI not associated with ventilators. Operated patients, however, have thus far not been a primary target for LRTI surveillance.AimWe aimed to describe the applied LRTI surveillance method in the German surveillance module for operated patients (OP-KISS) and to report data between 2018 and 2022.MethodsSurveillance of LRTI can be performed voluntarily in addition to surgical site infection (SSI) surveillance in OP-KISS. We calculated LRTI rates per 100 operations for all procedures combined, as well as for individual surgical groups and procedures. Additionally, a combined post-operative infection rate (SSI and LRTI) was calculated.ResultsSurveillance of LRTI was performed in 4% of all participating OP-KISS departments and for 2% (23,239 of 1,332,438) of all procedures in the OP-KISS database. The pooled LRTI rate was 0.9 per 100 operations, with marked differences between different types of surgery (3.6 for lobectomies, 0.1 for traumatology and orthopaedics). The share of LRTI among all post-operative infections was highly variable. For lobectomies, the LRTI rate was higher than the SSI rate (3.6 vs 1.5 per 100 operations).ConclusionSurveillance of post-operative LRTI is not yet widely adopted by German hospitals. Based on the data in this study, lobectomies represent a prime target for post-operative LRTI surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
| | - Selin Saydan
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Clausmeyer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Geffers
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schlosser B, Weikert B, Fucini GB, Kohlmorgen B, Kola A, Weber A, Thoma N, Behnke M, Schwab F, Gastmeier P, Geffers C, Aghdassi SJS. Risk factors for transmission of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii in outbreak situations: results of a case-control study. BMC Infect Dis 2024; 24:120. [PMID: 38263063 PMCID: PMC10807151 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09015-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND An increase in patients with multidrug-resistant organisms and associated outbreaks during the COVID-19 pandemic have been reported in various settings, including low-endemic settings. Here, we report three distinct carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) outbreaks in five intensive care units of a university hospital in Berlin, Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS A case-control study was conducted with the objective of identifying risk factors for CRAB acquisition in outbreak situations. Data utilized for the case-control study came from the investigation of three separate CRAB outbreaks during the COVID-19 pandemic (August 2020- March 2021). Cases were defined as outbreak patients with hospital-acquired CRAB. Controls did not have any CRAB positive microbiological findings and were hospitalized at the same ward and for a similar duration as the respective case. Control patients were matched retrospectively in a 2:1 ratio. Parameters routinely collected in the context of outbreak management and data obtained retrospectively specifically for the case-control study were included in the analysis. To analyze risk factors for CRAB acquisition, univariable and multivariable analyses to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed using a conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS The outbreaks contained 26 cases with hospital-acquired CRAB in five different intensive care units. Two exposures were identified to be independent risk factors for nosocomial CRAB acquisition by the multivariable regression analysis: Sharing a patient room with a CRAB patient before availability of the microbiological result was associated with a more than tenfold increase in the risk of nosocomial CRAB acquisition (OR: 10.7, CI: 2.3-50.9), while undergoing bronchoscopy increased the risk more than six times (OR: 6.9, CI: 1.3-38.1). CONCLUSIONS The risk factors identified, sharing a patient room with a CRAB patient and undergoing bronchoscopy, could point to an underperformance of basic infection control measure, particularly hand hygiene compliance and handling of medical devices. Both findings reinforce the need for continued promotion of infection control measures. Given that the outbreaks occurred in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, our study serves as a reminder that a heightened focus on airborne precautions should not lead to a neglect of other transmission-based precautions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beate Schlosser
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Beate Weikert
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giovanni-Battista Fucini
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Britta Kohlmorgen
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Axel Kola
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Weber
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Norbert Thoma
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Schwab
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Geffers
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt- Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
- BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin Institute of Health at Charité- Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Weber A, Neffe L, Diaz LAP, Thoma N, Aghdassi SJS, Denkel LA, Maechler F, Behnke M, Häussler S, Gastmeier P, Kola A. Analysis of transmission-related third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales by electronic data mining and core genome multi-locus sequence typing. J Hosp Infect 2023; 140:96-101. [PMID: 37562589 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To contain intra-hospital transmission of third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCR-E), contact isolation precautions are recommended. AIM To quantify transmissions of 3GCR Escherichia coli and 3GCR Klebsiella pneumoniae within a hospital. METHODS An automated outbreak detection system (AODS) was used to identify clusters (N≥2) of 3GCR Enterobacterales for the years 2016, 2018 and 2020. Clusters were defined by phenotypic agreement of microbiological results and spatial and temporal relationship. Core genome multi-locus sequence typing (cgMLST) was used to confirm whether the cluster isolates were transmitted between patients. FINDINGS A total of 4343 3GCR E. coli and 1377 K. pneumoniae isolates were analysed. Among the 3GCR E. coli isolates, the AODS identified 304 isolates as cluster isolates, the median cluster size was two (range: 2-5). The cgMLST analysis revealed that a total of 23 (7.5%) 3GCR E. coli cluster isolates were transmission-associated, of which 20 isolates (87%) were detected in intensive care patients. Among the 3GCR K. pneumoniae isolates, the AODS identified 73 isolates as cluster isolates, the median cluster size was two (range: 2-4). CgMLST revealed that 35 (48%) 3GCR K. pneumoniae cluster isolates were transmission associated, of which 27 isolates (77%) were detected in intensive care patients. CONCLUSION For 3GCR K. pneumoniae, cgMLST confirmed the AODS results more frequently than for 3GCR E. coli. Therefore, contact isolation precautions for 3GCR K. pneumoniae may be appropriate on intensive care units, but only in certain circumstances, such as outbreaks, for Enterobacterales with lower transmissibility, such as E. coli.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Weber
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - L Neffe
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Molecular Bacteriology, Braunschweig, Germany
| | - L A P Diaz
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - N Thoma
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - S J S Aghdassi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Programme, Berlin, Germany
| | - L A Denkel
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - F Maechler
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Behnke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Häussler
- Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, Department of Molecular Bacteriology, Braunschweig, Germany; TWINCORE, Centre for Experimental and Clinical Infection Research, A Joint Venture of the HZI and the Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - P Gastmeier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Kola
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Aghdassi SJS, Goodarzi H, Gropmann A, Clausmeyer J, Geffers C, Piening B, Gastmeier P, Behnke M. Surgical site infection surveillance in German hospitals: a national survey to determine the status quo of digitalization. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2023; 12:49. [PMID: 37208780 PMCID: PMC10197484 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-023-01253-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surveillance of surgical site infections (SSI) relies on access to data from various sources. Insights into the practices of German hospitals conducting SSI surveillance and their information technology (IT) infrastructures are scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate current SSI surveillance practices in German hospitals with a focus on employed IT infrastructures. METHODS German surgical departments actively participating in the national SSI surveillance module "OP-KISS" were invited in August 2020 to participate in a questionnaire-based online survey. Depending on whether departments entered all data manually or used an existing feature to import denominator data into the national surveillance database, departments were separated into different groups. Selected survey questions differed between groups. RESULTS Of 1,346 invited departments, 821 participated in the survey (response rate: 61%). Local IT deficits (n = 236), incompatibility of import specifications and hospital information system (n = 153) and lack of technical expertise (n = 145) were cited as the most frequent reasons for not using the denominator data import feature. Conversely, reduction of workload (n = 160) was named as the main motivation to import data. Questions on data availability and accessibility in the electronic hospital information system (HIS) and options to export data from the HIS for the purpose of surveillance, yielded diverse results. Departments utilizing the import feature tended to be from larger hospitals with a higher level of care. CONCLUSIONS The degree to which digital solutions were employed for SSI surveillance differed considerably between surgical departments in Germany. Improving availability and accessibility of information in HIS and meeting interoperability standards will be prerequisites for increasing the amount of data exported directly from HIS to national databases and laying the foundation for automated SSI surveillance on a broad scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Hengameh Goodarzi
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Gropmann
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Jörg Clausmeyer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Geffers
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Brar Piening
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bischoff P, Kramer TS, Schröder C, Behnke M, Schwab F, Geffers C, Gastmeier P, Aghdassi SJS. Age as a risk factor for surgical site infections: German surveillance data on total hip replacement and total knee replacement procedures 2009 to 2018. Euro Surveill 2023; 28:2200535. [PMID: 36862096 PMCID: PMC9983069 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2023.28.9.2200535] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BackgroundOlder age is frequently cited as a risk factor for healthcare-associated infections in general, and surgical site infections (SSIs) specifically.AimWe aimed to investigate the correlation between age and SSI occurrence.MethodsData on total hip replacement (THR) and total knee replacement (TKR) surgeries and resulting SSIs documented in the German national surveillance network from a 10-year period from 2009 to 2018 were selected for analysis. SSI rates and adjusted odds ratios (AOR) were calculated and a multivariable analysis to determine risk factors for SSI occurrence was conducted.ResultsA total of 418,312 THR procedures resulting in 3,231 SSIs, and 286,074 TKR procedures with 1,288 SSIs were included in the analyses. For THR, SSI rates were higher in older age groups when compared with the reference age group of 61-65 years. A significantly higher risk was observed in the 76-80 years age group (AOR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.05-1.4). An age of ≤ 50 years was associated with a significantly lower SSI risk (AOR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.52-0.8). For TKR, a similar correlation was observed, with the exception of the youngest age group (≤ 52 years), which was shown to have an SSI risk equal to that of the knee prosthesis reference age group (78-82 years).ConclusionA strong correlation between increasing age and SSI occurrence was observed for both procedure types. The results of our analyses provide a basis to consider future targeted SSI prevention measures for different age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Bischoff
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Siegfried Kramer
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christin Schröder
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Schwab
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Geffers
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany,Berlin Institute of Health at Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Aghdassi SJS, Schwab F, Peña Diaz LA, Brodzinski A, Fucini GB, Hansen S, Kohlmorgen B, Piening B, Schlosser B, Schneider S, Weikert B, Wiese-Posselt M, Wolff S, Behnke M, Gastmeier P, Geffers C. Risk factors for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections in patients: results from a retrospective matched case-control study in a tertiary care university center. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2022; 11:9. [PMID: 35039089 PMCID: PMC8762437 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-022-01056-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Factors contributing to the spread of SARS-CoV-2 outside the acute care hospital setting have been described in detail. However, data concerning risk factors for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections in hospitalized patients remain scarce. To close this research gap and inform targeted measures for the prevention of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections, we analyzed nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 cases in our hospital during a defined time period. METHODS Data on nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections in hospitalized patients that occurred between May 2020 and January 2021 at Charité university hospital in Berlin, Germany, were retrospectively gathered. A SARS-CoV-2 infection was considered nosocomial if the patient was admitted with a negative SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test and subsequently tested positive on day five or later. As the incubation period of SARS-CoV-2 can be longer than five days, we defined a subgroup of "definite" nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 cases, with a negative test on admission and a positive test after day 10, for which we conducted a matched case-control study with a one to one ratio of cases and controls. We employed a multivariable logistic regression model to identify factors significantly increasing the likelihood of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections. RESULTS A total of 170 patients with a nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection were identified. The majority of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 patients (n = 157, 92%) had been treated at wards that reported an outbreak of nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 cases during their stay or up to 14 days later. For 76 patients with definite nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infections, controls for the case-control study were matched. For this subgroup, the multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed documented contact to SARS-CoV-2 cases (odds ratio: 23.4 (95% confidence interval: 4.6-117.7)) and presence at a ward that experienced a SARS-CoV-2 outbreak (odds ratio: 15.9 (95% confidence interval: 2.5-100.8)) to be the principal risk factors for nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection. CONCLUSIONS With known contact to SARS-CoV-2 cases and outbreak association revealed as the primary risk factors, our findings confirm known causes of SARS-CoV-2 infections and demonstrate that these also apply to the acute care hospital setting. This underscores the importance of rapidly identifying exposed patients and taking adequate preventive measures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany. .,Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Digital Clinician Scientist Program, Anna-Louisa-Karsch-Straße 2, 10178, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Frank Schwab
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Alberto Peña Diaz
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Annika Brodzinski
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Giovanni-Battista Fucini
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Hansen
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Britta Kohlmorgen
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Brar Piening
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beate Schlosser
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sandra Schneider
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beate Weikert
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Miriam Wiese-Posselt
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sebastian Wolff
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christine Geffers
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Aghdassi SJS, Kohlmorgen B, Schröder C, Peña Diaz LA, Thoma N, Rohde AM, Piening B, Gastmeier P, Behnke M. Implementation of an automated cluster alert system into the routine work of infection control and hospital epidemiology: experiences from a tertiary care university hospital. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:1075. [PMID: 34663246 PMCID: PMC8522860 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06771-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Early detection of clusters of pathogens is crucial for infection prevention and control (IPC) in hospitals. Conventional manual cluster detection is usually restricted to certain areas of the hospital and multidrug resistant organisms. Automation can increase the comprehensiveness of cluster surveillance without depleting human resources. We aimed to describe the application of an automated cluster alert system (CLAR) in the routine IPC work in a hospital. Additionally, we aimed to provide information on the clusters detected and their properties. Methods CLAR was continuously utilized during the year 2019 at Charité university hospital. CLAR analyzed microbiological and patient-related data to calculate a pathogen-baseline for every ward. Daily, this baseline was compared to data of the previous 14 days. If the baseline was exceeded, a cluster alert was generated and sent to the IPC team. From July 2019 onwards, alerts were systematically categorized as relevant or non-relevant at the discretion of the IPC physician in charge. Results In one year, CLAR detected 1,714 clusters. The median number of isolates per cluster was two. The most common cluster pathogens were Enterococcus faecium (n = 326, 19 %), Escherichia coli (n = 274, 16 %) and Enterococcus faecalis (n = 250, 15 %). The majority of clusters (n = 1,360, 79 %) comprised of susceptible organisms. For 906 alerts relevance assessment was performed, with 317 (35 %) alerts being classified as relevant. Conclusions CLAR demonstrated the capability of detecting small clusters and clusters of susceptible organisms. Future improvements must aim to reduce the number of non-relevant alerts without impeding detection of relevant clusters. Digital solutions to IPC represent a considerable potential for improved patient care. Systems such as CLAR could be adapted to other hospitals and healthcare settings, and thereby serve as a means to fulfill these potentials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany. .,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Britta Kohlmorgen
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christin Schröder
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Alberto Peña Diaz
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Norbert Thoma
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anna Maria Rohde
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Brar Piening
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Universität zu Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Aghdassi SJS, Schröder C, Gastmeier P. Urgency of surgery as an indicator for the occurrence of surgical site infections: data from over 100,000 surgical procedures. J Hosp Infect 2021; 110:1-6. [PMID: 33422591 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2020.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 12/26/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk for surgical site infections (SSIs) is influenced by patient- and procedure-related factors. Urgent surgery represents a challenge in operative medicine and is frequently linked to a variety of complications, including SSIs. AIM We aimed to investigate whether urgency was significantly associated with SSI occurrence, and determine whether collection of this variable provided useful information for SSI surveillance. METHODS We performed a retrospective data analysis of caesarean sections (C-sections) and colon surgeries conducted between 2017 and 2019 within the German national SSI surveillance network. A multivariable logistic regression model was utilized to determine the influence of urgency on SSI occurrence. For this purpose, data on procedures and SSIs were associated with available department- and patient-related parameters. FINDINGS A total of 115,648 procedures were included in the analysis: 78,288 C-sections and 37,360 colon surgeries. For C-sections, the SSI rate per 100 procedures was 0.98 (95% confidence interval: 0.85-1.11) for urgent and 0.46 (0.40-0.53) for elective procedures (P<0.001). For open colon surgeries, SSI rates were 9.66 (8.89-10.49) for urgent and 8.60 (8.13-9.11) for elective procedures (P<0.001). For laparoscopic colon surgeries, SSI rates did not differ significantly. Multivariable analysis revealed that urgency significantly increased the likelihood of SSI occurrence only for C-sections. CONCLUSION Urgency significantly increased the SSI risk of C-sections, but not colon surgeries. Hence, collection of this variable is useful for SSI surveillance of C-sections, but may be dispensable for other procedures. Future analyses on the matter should therefore focus on other procedure types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J S Aghdassi
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany.
| | - C Schröder
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Gastmeier
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Schneider S, Piening B, Nouri-Pasovsky PA, Krüger AC, Gastmeier P, Aghdassi SJS. SARS-Coronavirus-2 cases in healthcare workers may not regularly originate from patient care: lessons from a university hospital on the underestimated risk of healthcare worker to healthcare worker transmission. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:192. [PMID: 33287908 PMCID: PMC7719852 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00848-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 10/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) represents an unprecedented healthcare challenge. Various SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks in healthcare facilities have been reported. Healthcare workers (HCWs) may play a critical role in the spread of the virus, particularly when asymptomatic. We examined four healthcare-associated outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 infections that occurred at a university hospital in Berlin, Germany. We aimed to describe and analyze the spread of the virus in order to draw conclusions for effective containment of SARS-CoV-2 in healthcare facilities. METHODS Healthcare-associated outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 infections were defined as two or more laboratory confirmed infections with SARS-CoV-2 where an epidemiological link within the healthcare setting appeared likely. We focused our analysis on one of three sites of the Charité-University Medicine hospital within a 2 month period (March and April 2020). RESULTS We observed four healthcare-associated outbreaks of SARS-CoV-2 infections, with a total of 24 infected persons (23 HCWs and one patient). The outbreaks were detected in the departments of nephrology and dialysis (n = 9), anesthesiology (n = 8), surgical pediatrics (n = 4), and neurology (n = 3). Each outbreak showed multiple unprotected contacts between infected HCWs. A combination of contact tracing, testing, physical distancing and mandatory continuous wearing of face masks by all HCWs was able to contain all four outbreaks. CONCLUSIONS HCW to HCW transmission represented the likely source of the four outbreaks. Ensuring proper physical distancing measures and wearing of protective equipment, also when interacting with colleagues, must be a key aspect of fighting COVID-19 in healthcare facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandra Schneider
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Brar Piening
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pauline Assina Nouri-Pasovsky
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Anne Caroline Krüger
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aghdassi SJS, Schröder C, Lemke E, Behnke M, Fliss PM, Plotzki C, Wenk J, Gastmeier P, Kramer TS. A multimodal intervention to improve hand hygiene compliance in peripheral wards of a tertiary care university centre: a cluster randomised controlled trial. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:113. [PMID: 32682429 PMCID: PMC7368705 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00776-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 07/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Interventions to improve hand hygiene (HH) compliance are a key element in the practice infection prevention and control. It was our objective to assess the effect of a multimodal intervention on HH compliance at a tertiary care university hospital. As a secondary objective, we investigated the effect of the intervention on the occurrence of device-associated bloodstream infections. Methods We performed a single centre cluster randomised controlled trial at a university hospital in Germany. Twenty peripheral wards were invited to participate and randomly assigned to either the intervention (n = 10) or control group (n = 10). Quarterly, specifically trained student employees conducted direct compliance observations in all twenty wards. The intervention entailed dissemination of teaching materials on aseptic procedures, equipment with flexibly mountable alcoholic hand rub dispensers, and quarterly feedback on HH compliance. Results In total, 21,424 HH opportunities were observed. Overall, compliance did not change significantly in either group (intervention group: 59% vs. 61% (1482 HH actions for 2494 HH opportunities vs. 5033 HH actions for 8215 HH opportunities), odds ratio (OR) 1.08 (95% confidence interval (CI95) 0.88, 1.33)); control group: 59% vs. 60% (1457 HH actions for 2484 HH opportunities vs. 4948 HH actions for 8231 HH opportunities), OR 1.06 (CI95 0.84, 1.35)). Compliance prior to aseptic procedures improved significantly in the intervention group from 44% (168 HH actions for 380 HH opportunities) to 53% (764 HH actions for 1452 HH opportunities) (OR 1.40 (CI95 1.04, 1.89), p = 0.03), while no significant increase was noted in the control group. In the intervention group, significantly fewer device-associated bloodstream infections per 1000 patient-days occurred than in the control group (84 vs. 123, incidence rate ratio 0.61 (CI95 0.46, 0.81), p < 0.01). Conclusions The lack of a significant overall improvement of HH compliance demonstrated that comprehensive implementation of HH interventions in multiple wards simultaneously is difficult. However, through targeted intervention measures, we were able to significantly increase HH compliance before aseptic procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany. .,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Christin Schröder
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Elke Lemke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | - Janina Wenk
- BODE SCIENCE CENTER, BODE Chemie GmbH, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Siegfried Kramer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Aktion Saubere Hände, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Aghdassi SJS, Schwab F, Hoffmann P, Gastmeier P. The Association of Climatic Factors with Rates of Surgical Site Infections: 17 Years' Data From Hospital Infection Surveillance. Dtsch Arztebl Int 2020; 116:529-536. [PMID: 31554540 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2019.0529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 05/16/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most common healthcare- associated infections. The aim of our explorative study was to determine how selected climatic factors are associated with SSI rates. METHODS SSI rates were calculated for operative procedures included in the surgi- cal site infection surveillance component (OP-KISS) of the German Nosocomial Infection Surveillance System (Krankenhaus-Infektions-Surveillance-System, KISS) during the years from 2000 to 2016. The surgeries were associated with department-related and patient-related data. Data of the German Meteorological Service (Deutscher Wetterdienst, DWD), including outdoor temperature and rainfall, were used to analyze the association between climatic factors and rates of SSI. Analyses focused on temperature which showed strong correlations with other climatic parameters. A descriptive analysis was performed, using the chi-squared test. Adjusted odds ratios (AORs) were calculated for SSI rates in relation to tem- perature, using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS For the altogether 2 004 793 included operative procedures, 32 118 SSIs were documented. Temperatures ≥ 20 °C were associated with a significantly higher occurrence of SSI compared to temperatures <5 °C (AOR: 1.13; 95% confi- dence intervals [1.06; 1.20]). This increase was found for gram-positive pathogens (AOR: 1.13 [1.03; 1.23]) and, even more pronounced, for gram-negative pathogens (AOR: 1.20 [1.07; 1.35]). The association was strongest for superficial SSI caused by gram-negative pathogens (AOR: 1.38 [1.16; 1.64]). CONCLUSION An association between climatic factors and SSI rates was demon- strated. The predicted rise in global temperatures by up to 4 °C by the end of this century compared to preindustrial levels may increase the likelihood of SSI and should be taken into consideration in future preventive strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany; Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Aghdassi SJS, Grisold A, Wechsler-Fördös A, Hansen S, Bischoff P, Behnke M, Gastmeier P. Evaluating infection prevention and control programs in Austrian acute care hospitals using the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2020; 9:92. [PMID: 32571434 PMCID: PMC7309981 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-020-00761-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2019] [Accepted: 06/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Infection prevention and control (IPC) is crucial for patient safety. The World Health Organization (WHO) has released various tools to promote IPC. In 2018, the WHO released the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) that enables acute care healthcare facilities to evaluate IPC structures and practices. Data regarding IPC implementation in Austria are scarce. To deliver insights into this topic and promote the IPCAF within the Austrian IPC community, we decided to invite all Austrian hospitals participating in the German nosocomial infection surveillance system to conduct a self-assessment using the WHO IPCAF. Methods The IPCAF follows the eight WHO core components of IPC. A German translation of the IPCAF was sent to 127 Austrian acute care hospitals. The survey period was from October to December 2018. Participation in the survey, data entry and transfer to the German national reference center for surveillance of healthcare-associated infections was on a voluntary basis. Results Altogether, 65 Austrian hospitals provided a complete dataset. The overall median IPCAF score of all hospitals was 620 (of a possible maximum score of 800), which corresponded to an advanced level of IPC. Of the 65 hospitals, 38 achieved an advanced IPC level. Deeper analysis of the different core components yielded diverse results. Scores were lowest for core components on multimodal strategies for implementation of IPC interventions, and IPC education and training. Around 26% (n = 17) of hospitals reported that the local IPC team was not steadily supported by an IPC committee. Senior clinical staff was not present in the IPC committee in 23% (n = 15) of hospitals. Only 26% (n = 17) of hospitals reported employing at least one IPC professional per ≤250 beds. Surveillance for multidrug-resistant pathogens was not conducted in 26% (n = 17) of hospitals. Conclusions Implementation of IPC key aspects is generally at a high level in Austria. However, potentials for improvement were demonstrated, most prominently with regard to staffing, IPC education and training, effective implementation of multimodal strategies, and involvement of professional groups. Our survey demonstrated that the IPCAF is a useful tool for IPC self-assessment and can uncover deficits even in a high-income setting like Austria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany. .,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Andrea Grisold
- D&R Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University, Graz, Austria.,Austrian Society of Hygiene, Microbiology and Preventive Medicine, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Sonja Hansen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Bischoff
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aghdassi SJS, Gastmeier P, Behnke M, Hansen S, Kramer TS. Redundant Anaerobic Antimicrobial Prescriptions in German Acute Care Hospitals: Data from a National Point Prevalence Survey. Antibiotics (Basel) 2020; 9:antibiotics9060288. [PMID: 32481490 PMCID: PMC7345752 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics9060288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 05/18/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite limited indications, redundant anaerobic antimicrobial prescriptions (RAAPs) are frequent. The objective of this study was to assess the prevalence and characteristics of RAAPs in German acute care hospitals. In a retrospective data analysis, antimicrobial prescriptions from a point prevalence survey on antimicrobial use in German acute care hospitals in 2016 were analyzed and RAAPs were identified. RAAPs were defined as a patient simultaneously receiving any of the following combinations: Penicillin/beta-lactamase inhibitor (PenBLI) plus clindamycin; PenBLI plus metronidazole; PenBLI plus moxifloxacin; PenBLI plus carbapenem; carbapenem plus clindamycin; carbapenem plus metronidazole; carbapenem plus moxifloxacin; clindamycin plus metronidazole; clindamycin plus moxifloxacin; and metronidazole plus moxifloxacin. Data from 64,412 patients in 218 hospitals were included. Overall, 4486 patients (7%) received two or more antimicrobials. In total, 441 RAAP combinations were identified. PenBLI plus metronidazole was the most common anaerobic combination (N = 166, 38%). The majority of RAAPs were for the treatment of community-acquired (N = 258, 59%) infections. Lower respiratory tract infections (N = 77; 20%) and skin/soft tissue infections (N = 76; 20%) were the most frequently recorded types of infections. RAAPs are common in German hospitals. Reducing redundant antimicrobial coverage should be a key component of future antimicrobial stewardship activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (M.B.); (S.H.); (T.S.K.)
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, 12203 Berlin, Germany
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +49-304-5057-7608; Fax: +49-304-5057-7920
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (M.B.); (S.H.); (T.S.K.)
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (M.B.); (S.H.); (T.S.K.)
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Hansen
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (M.B.); (S.H.); (T.S.K.)
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Siegfried Kramer
- Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany; (P.G.); (M.B.); (S.H.); (T.S.K.)
- National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Aghdassi SJS, Geffers C, Behnke M, Gropmann A, Gastmeier P, Kramer TS. Management of peripheral venous catheters and implementation of guidelines in Germany: a national survey. J Hosp Infect 2019; 105:311-318. [PMID: 31887334 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2019.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to their frequent use, peripheral venous catheters (PVCs) are of importance in terms of catheter-related infections and their prevention. In 2017, revised national guidelines for the prevention of PVC-related infections were published in Germany. AIM To describe PVC handling practices and assess the implementation of national guidelines for the prevention of PVC-related infections in German acute care hospitals, 10 months after their release. METHODS An online survey on the management of PVCs in hospital wards was conducted. For this, 1191 acute care hospitals participating in the national surveillance system for healthcare-associated infections in Germany were invited to participate. Each hospital was asked to complete the survey for an intensive care unit (ICU), as well as a medical ward and a surgical ward. Participation in the survey was voluntary. FINDINGS In total, 701 hospitals (response rate 59%) participated and provided data on 1449 wards (599 ICUs, 446 medical wards, 404 surgical wards). Approximately 43% of wards reported that they had implemented the new national guidelines where necessary. Structured surveillance for PVC-associated infections was established in only 21% of wards. While 94% of wards reported the inclusion of aspects of PVC handling in their general infection prevention education, questions on the training methods yielded diverse results. Approximately 59% of wards reported that they did not routinely use a combination of alcohol and a remanant disinfectant for skin disinfection before PVC insertion. CONCLUSION Generally, PVC management in Germany is well organized. However, potential for improvement was identified, particularly considering surveillance and implementation of selected national guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S J S Aghdassi
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.
| | - C Geffers
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - M Behnke
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - A Gropmann
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - P Gastmeier
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - T S Kramer
- Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany; National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Aghdassi SJS, Schwab F, Hansen S, Peña Diaz LA, Behnke M, Gastmeier P, Kramer TS. The quality of antimicrobial prescribing in acute care hospitals: results derived from a national point prevalence survey, Germany, 2016. Euro Surveill 2019; 24. [PMID: 31771705 PMCID: PMC6864975 DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.es.2019.24.46.1900281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BackgroundRobust data on the quality of antimicrobial prescriptions in German acute care hospitals are scarce. To establish and implement antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) measures and to increase prudent antimicrobial use (AMU), the identification of appropriate process and quality indicators is pertinent.AimOur main objective was to identify parameters associated with adequate AMU and inadequate AMU by analysing point prevalence data. Our secondary goal was to describe the current state of AMS implementation in Germany.MethodsA national point prevalence survey for healthcare-associated infections and AMU was conducted in German hospitals in 2016. Data on structure and process parameters were also collected. Recorded antimicrobial prescriptions were divided into adequate, inadequate and undefinable AMU. A multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to examine the correlation of selected structure and process parameters with the adequacy of recorded antimicrobials.ResultsData from 218 acute care hospitals, 64,412 patients and 22,086 administered antimicrobials were included. Multivariable linear regression analysis revealed that documentation of a reason for AMU in the patient notes increased the likelihood of adequate AMU and decreased the likelihood of inadequate AMU significantly (p < 0.001), while tertiary care hospital type had the opposite effect (p < 0.001).ConclusionThrough associating structural and process parameters with adequacy of AMU, we identified parameters that increased the odds of prudent AMU. Documentation was a key element for improving AMU. Revealed deficits regarding the implementation of AMS in German hospitals concerning dedicated staff for AMS activities and establishment of regular AMU training and AMU audits should be tackled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Schwab
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Hansen
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Alberto Peña Diaz
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Siegfried Kramer
- National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kramer TS, Schwab F, Behnke M, Hansen S, Gastmeier P, Aghdassi SJS. Linezolid use in German acute care hospitals: results from two consecutive national point prevalence surveys. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8:159. [PMID: 31649816 PMCID: PMC6805522 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0617-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 10/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Linezolid belongs to a reserve group of antibiotics. In recent years, reports on linezolid resistance in gram-positive cocci have become more frequent. Overuse of linezolid is a relevant factor for resistance development. The objective of this study was to describe current prescription practices of linezolid in German hospitals and identify targets for antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Methods We analyzed all linezolid prescriptions from the datasets of the consecutive national point prevalence surveys performed in German hospitals in 2011 and 2016. In both surveys, data on healthcare-associated infections and antimicrobial use were collected following the methodology of the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Results Overall, the percentage of linezolid among all documented antimicrobials increased significantly from 2011 to 2016 (p < 0.01). In 2011, 0.3% (119 of 41,539) patients received linezolid, in 2016 this proportion was significantly higher (0.4%; 255 of 64,412 patients; p < 0.01). In 2016, intensive care units (ICUs) were the wards most frequently prescribing linezolid. The largest proportion of patients receiving linezolid were non-ICU patients. Roughly 38% of linezolid prescriptions were for treatment of skin/soft tissue and respiratory tract infections. In 2016, linezolid was administered parenterally in 70% (n = 179) of cases. Multivariable analysis showed that the ward specialty ICU posed an independent risk factor, while Northern and Southwestern regions in Germany were independent protective factors for a high rate of linezolid prescriptions. Conclusions In conclusion, we detected potentials for improving linezolid prescription practices in German hospitals. Given the emergence of linezolid resistance, optimization of linezolid use must be a target of future antimicrobial stewardship activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tobias Siegfried Kramer
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Frank Schwab
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Hansen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Aghdassi SJS, Schröder C, Gastmeier P. Gender-related risk factors for surgical site infections. Results from 10 years of surveillance in Germany. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8:95. [PMID: 31171966 PMCID: PMC6547551 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0547-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2019] [Accepted: 05/26/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical site infections (SSI) are among the most frequently occurring healthcare-associated infections worldwide. Various analyses to determine risk factors have been conducted in the past, generally attributing a higher SSI-risk to male patients. However, when focusing on specific procedures, this is not always true. Our objective was to identify for which procedures male or female sex represents an independent risk factor for SSI and which parameters may explain these differences. Methods We used the database of surgical procedures from the German national nosocomial infection surveillance system. We included procedures conducted between 2008 and 2017. We excluded procedures solely executed for one sex (e.g. mastectomy) and procedures with 20,000 or fewer operations. The observed outcome was the occurrence of SSI. All models were adjusted for confounders, which were eliminated with backward selection. The following factors were included in the analysis: age, ASA score, wound contamination class, duration of surgery, and season. All models contained the investigated factor sex. Results Sixteen procedure types with 1,266,782 individual procedures and 18,824 SSI were included. Overall, the incidence rate ratio and the adjusted odds ratio for SSI were significantly higher for male patients. The included individual procedures were grouped into five surgical categories. For orthopedics and traumatology as well as abdominal surgery, SSI-rates were significantly higher for male patients. For heart and vascular surgery, SSI-rates were significantly higher for female patients. Other included surgical categories and individual procedures yielded diverse results. Similar results were found when solely analyzing deep and organ-space SSI. Multivariable analysis for attributable gender-related risk factors revealed differences with regard to underlying risk factors. Conclusions SSI-rates differ by sex for certain procedures. When examining underlying risk factors, differences between male and female patients can be demonstrated. Our analysis considered a limited number of parameters, which were not sufficient to fully explain the observed differences. Further studies are required to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the topic and to include gender-specific aspects into future SSI-prevention strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christin Schröder
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Aghdassi SJS, Gastmeier P, Piening BC, Behnke M, Peña Diaz LA, Gropmann A, Rosenbusch ML, Kramer TS, Hansen S. Antimicrobial usage in German acute care hospitals: results of the third national point prevalence survey and comparison with previous national point prevalence surveys. J Antimicrob Chemother 2019; 73:1077-1083. [PMID: 29309607 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkx494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2017] [Accepted: 11/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Previous point prevalence surveys (PPSs) revealed the potential for improving antimicrobial usage (AU) in German acute care hospitals. Data from the 2016 German national PPS on healthcare-associated infections and AU were used to evaluate efforts in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Methods A national PPS in Germany was organized by the German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections in 2016 as part of the European PPS initiated by the ECDC. The data were collected in May and June 2016. Results were compared with data from the PPS 2011. Results A total of 218 hospitals with 64 412 observed patients participated in the PPS 2016. The prevalence of patients with AU was 25.9% (95% CI 25.6%-26.3%). No significant increase or decrease in AU prevalence was revealed in the group of all participating hospitals. Prolonged surgical prophylaxis was found to be common (56.1% of all surgical prophylaxes on the prevalence day), but significantly less prevalent than in 2011 (P < 0.01). The most frequently administered antimicrobial groups were penicillins plus β-lactamase inhibitors (BLIs) (23.2%), second-generation cephalosporins (12.9%) and fluoroquinolones (11.3%). Significantly more penicillins plus BLIs and fewer second-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones were used in 2016. Overall, an increase in the consumption of broad-spectrum antimicrobials was noted. For 68.7% of all administered antimicrobials, the indication was documented in the patient notes. Conclusions The current data reaffirm the points of improvement that previous data identified and reveal that recent efforts in AMS in German hospitals require further intensification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Brar Christian Piening
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Luis Alberto Peña Diaz
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Gropmann
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Marie-Luise Rosenbusch
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Tobias Siegfried Kramer
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Hansen
- Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany.,German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ), Hindenburgdamm 27, 12203 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Aghdassi SJS, Hansen S, Bischoff P, Behnke M, Gastmeier P. A national survey on the implementation of key infection prevention and control structures in German hospitals: results from 736 hospitals conducting the WHO Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF). Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8:73. [PMID: 31080588 PMCID: PMC6505265 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0532-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Healthcare-associated infections (HAI) pose a burden on healthcare providers worldwide. To prevent HAI and strengthen infection prevention and control (IPC) structures, the WHO has developed a variety of tools and guidelines. Recently, the WHO released the Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF), a questionnaire-like tool designed for assessing IPC structures at the facility level. The IPCAF reflects the eight WHO core components of IPC. Data on the implementation of IPC measures in German hospitals are scarce. Therefore, it was our objective to utilize the IPCAF in order to gather information on the current state of IPC implementation in German hospitals, as well as to promote the IPCAF to a broad audience. Methods The National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ) sent a translated version of the IPCAF to 1472 acute care hospitals in Germany. Data entry and transfer to the NRZ was done electronically between October and December 2018. The IPCAF was conceived in a way that depending on the selected answers a score was calculated, with 0 being the lowest possible and 800 the highest possible score. Depending on the overall score, the IPCAF allocated hospitals to four different “IPC levels”: inadequate, basic, intermediate, and advanced. Results A total of 736 hospitals provided a complete dataset and were included in the data analysis. The overall median score of all hospitals was 690, which corresponded to an advanced level of IPC. Only three hospitals (0.4%) fell into the category “basic”, with 111 hospitals (15.1%) being “intermediate” and 622 hospitals (84.5%) being “advanced”. In no case was the category “inadequate” allocated. More profound differences were found between the respective core components. Components on multimodal strategies and workload, staffing, ward design and bed occupancy revealed the lowest scores. Conclusions IPC key aspects in general are well established in Germany. Potentials for improvement were identified particularly with regard to workload and staffing. Insufficient implementation of multimodal strategies was found to be another relevant deficit. Our survey represents a successful attempt at promoting the IPCAF and encouraging hospitals to utilize WHO tools for self-assessment. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0532-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Sonja Hansen
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Bischoff
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Michael Behnke
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Aghdassi SJS, Schröder C, Gruhl D, Gastmeier P, Salm F. Point prevalence survey of peripheral venous catheter usage in a large tertiary care university hospital in Germany. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2019; 8:15. [PMID: 30675342 PMCID: PMC6335674 DOI: 10.1186/s13756-019-0468-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 01/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Bloodstream infections (BSI) are among the most frequently documented healthcare-associated infections (HAI). Central and peripheral venous catheters (CVC and PVC) are relevant risk factors for BSI. Although the risk for BSI is higher for CVC, PVC are utilized more frequently and are therefore relevant in the context of HAI prevention. Robust data on the prevalence of PVC and associated infections in German hospitals are scarce to this date. The objectives of this survey were to estimate the prevalence of PVC and PVC-associated infections on peripheral wards of a large tertiary care hospital in Germany. The collected data may be utilized for a tailored infection prevention intervention in the future. Methods A point prevalence survey was conducted on peripheral wards of a tertiary care hospital with more than 3.000 beds. Data were collected between August 2017 and February 2018. Standardized data collection forms were used for collecting ward, patient and PVC-related data. As endpoints, prevalence of patients with PVC, PVC-associated infections and PVC without usage in the 24 h prior to the survey and without documentation of intended usage in the 24 h after the survey (“unused PVC”) were chosen. For data analysis, Kruskal-Wallis test was employed for continuous variables and Chi-squared test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Multivariable analysis and logistic regression were performed for the endpoint unused PVC. Results Data from 2.092 patients on 110 wards were collected. The overall prevalence of patients with PVC was 33%. Infections were recorded in 16 patients. Except one case of BSI, these were all local infections at the site of insertion. Of 725 documented PVC, 77 (11%) were unused PVC. Multivariate analysis and logistic regression revealed wards with the practice of regularly obtaining blood from PVC, PVC with dirty or loose insertion dressing, pediatric ward specialty and last inspection of the PVC more than 1 day ago as significant risk factors for unused PVC. Conclusions A substantial proportion of patients presented with a PVC on the day of survey. Too few infections were recorded to allow for more detailed analyses. Various risk factors for unused PVC were identified. We hereby present a solid method to obtain an overview about PVC use and to increase awareness for PVC-associated risks. The limitations of point prevalence surveys have to be recognized. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s13756-019-0468-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christin Schröder
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Désirée Gruhl
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany
| | - Florian Salm
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Berlin, Germany.,National Reference Center for the Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections, Berlin, Germany.,3Institute for Infection Prevention and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the most frequent healthcare-associated infections worldwide, representing a substantial burden on the healthcare system and the individual patient. Various risk factors for SSI have been identified, which can be separated into patient-related, procedure-related and other risk factors. Areas covered: Other risk factors relevant for SSI are the season in which surgery is performed, the volume of surgeries in a department, the working atmosphere in the operating room and the indications for surgery. Overall, the risk of SSI is higher during summertime. Higher-volume departments appear to be protective against SSI as does a calm working atmosphere. The frequency of certain types of surgery differs greatly among European countries. The decision to perform surgery appears to be dependent on the patient's condition as well as the healthcare system and financial incentives. Expert commentary: When possible, elective surgery should not be executed during summertime but during cooler times of year. Departments with a high volume of surgical procedures should be given preference. The establishment of a calm working atmosphere is beneficial to a surgeon's performance and can reduce SSI rates. The indications for performing surgery should be carefully reevaluated whenever possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seven Johannes Sam Aghdassi
- a Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin , Berlin , Germany.,b German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ) , Berlin , Germany
| | - Petra Gastmeier
- a Institute of Hygiene and Environmental Medicine, Charité - University Medicine Berlin , Berlin , Germany.,b German National Reference Centre for Surveillance of Nosocomial Infections (NRZ) , Berlin , Germany
| |
Collapse
|