1
|
Vellinga RE, Sam M, Verhagen H, Jakobsen LS, Ravn-Haren G, Sugimoto M, Torres D, Katagiri R, Thu BJ, Granby K, Hoekstra J, Temme EHM. Increasing Seaweed Consumption in the Netherlands and Portugal and the Consequences for the Intake of Iodine, Sodium, and Exposure to Chemical Contaminants: A Risk-Benefit Study. Front Nutr 2022; 8:792923. [PMID: 35071298 PMCID: PMC8770327 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.792923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 11/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Seaweed has a high potential for nourishing the future planet. However, besides being beneficial, it also contains adverse components; this poses the question whether consumption of seaweed foods overall contributes beneficially or detrimentally to human health, and hence if their consumption should be promoted or restricted. Methods: This study evaluated the impact of substituting regular foods with seaweed foods in the diet, both in terms of nutritional quality (via iodine and sodium) and food safety (via arsenic, cadmium, lead, and mercury). Food consumption data from the Netherlands and Portugal (adults aged >18 years) were used, in which 10% of the amounts of pasta, bacon, and lettuce consumed were replaced by seaweed-derived products made from kelp (Saccharina latissima). Using Monte Carlo Risk Assessment software (MCRA), long-term nutrient intake and exposure to contaminants were assessed. The results obtained for the Netherlands and Portugal were compared with data from Japan, a country that has a high natural consumption of seaweed. Results: This low-tier risk-benefit study reveals that an increased seaweed consumption (as assessed by the 10% replacement with seaweed products) has no consequences in terms of intake of sodium and exposure to cadmium, lead, and mercury, and the associated (absence of) adverse health aspects. The alternative scenario almost doubled the mean iodine intake in the Netherlands (to 300 μg/day) and Portugal (to 208 μg/day) and increased the average exposure to arsenic levels in the Netherlands (to 1.02 μg/kg bw/day) and Portugal (to 1.67 μg/kg bw/day). Conclusion: The intake of iodine and exposure to arsenic in the Netherland and Portugal were certainly higher due to the modeled increase of seaweed foods. If seaweed consumption increases close to the 10% substitution, the public health consequences thereof may trigger further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reina Elisabeth Vellinga
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Sam
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Hans Verhagen
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | - Gitte Ravn-Haren
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Minami Sugimoto
- Department of Social and Preventive Epidemiology, Division of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Duarte Torres
- Epidemiology Research Unit, Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Laboratory for Integrative and Translational Research in Population Health (ITR), Porto, Portugal
- Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Ryoko Katagiri
- Division of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health Science, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Kit Granby
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Jeljer Hoekstra
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth Helena Maria Temme
- Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Assunção R, Boué G, Alvito P, Brazão R, Carmona P, Carvalho C, Correia D, Fernandes P, Lopes C, Martins C, Membré JM, Monteiro S, Nabais P, Thomsen ST, Torres D, Pires SM, Jakobsen LS. Risk-Benefit Assessment of Cereal-Based Foods Consumed by Portuguese Children Aged 6 to 36 Months-A Case Study under the RiskBenefit4EU Project. Nutrients 2021; 13:nu13093127. [PMID: 34579004 PMCID: PMC8467172 DOI: 10.3390/nu13093127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2021] [Revised: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Cereal-based foods, including breakfast (BC) and infant cereals (IC), are among the first solid foods introduced to infants. BC and IC are sources of macro and micronutrients that have beneficial effects on health, but can also be sources of harmful chemical and microbiological contaminants and nutrients that may lead to adverse health effects at high consumption levels. This study was performed under the RiskBenefit4EU project with the aim of assessing the health impact associated with consumption of BC and IC by Portuguese children under 35 months. Adverse effects associated with the presence of aflatoxins, Bacillus cereus, sodium and free sugars were assessed against the benefits of fiber intake. We applied a risk–benefit assessment approach, and quantified the health impact of changes in consumption of BC and IC from current to various alternative consumption scenarios. Health impact was assessed in terms of disability-adjusted life years. Results showed that moving from the current consumption scenario to considered alternative scenarios results in a gain of healthy life years. Portuguese children can benefit from exchanging intake of IC to BC, if the BC consumed has an adequate nutritional profile in terms of fiber, sodium and free sugars, with levels of aflatoxins reduced as much as possible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Assunção
- Food and Nutrition Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.B.); (C.M.)
- CESAM, Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
- IUEM, Instituto Universitário Egas Moniz, Egas Moniz-Cooperativa de Ensino Superior, CRL, 2829-511 Caparica, Portugal
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +351-21-751-9219
| | - Géraldine Boué
- INRAe, Oniris, Secalim, 44307 Nantes, France; (G.B.); (P.F.); (J.-M.M.)
| | - Paula Alvito
- Food and Nutrition Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.B.); (C.M.)
- CESAM, Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
| | - Roberto Brazão
- Food and Nutrition Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.B.); (C.M.)
| | - Paulo Carmona
- Food Risks Unit, Economic and Food Safety Authority (ASAE), 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (S.M.); (P.N.)
| | - Catarina Carvalho
- Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal; (C.C.); (D.T.)
- EPIUnit—Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; (D.C.); (C.L.)
| | - Daniela Correia
- EPIUnit—Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; (D.C.); (C.L.)
- Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| | - Paulo Fernandes
- INRAe, Oniris, Secalim, 44307 Nantes, France; (G.B.); (P.F.); (J.-M.M.)
| | - Carla Lopes
- EPIUnit—Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; (D.C.); (C.L.)
- Department of Public Health and Forensic Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
| | - Carla Martins
- Food and Nutrition Department, National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, 1649-016 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.A.); (R.B.); (C.M.)
- CESAM, Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, 3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Public Health Research Center, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, 1600-560 Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Sarogini Monteiro
- Food Risks Unit, Economic and Food Safety Authority (ASAE), 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (S.M.); (P.N.)
| | - Pedro Nabais
- Food Risks Unit, Economic and Food Safety Authority (ASAE), 1649-038 Lisboa, Portugal; (P.C.); (S.M.); (P.N.)
| | - Sofie T. Thomsen
- Division for Diet, Disease Prevention and Toxicology, The National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark; (S.T.T.); (S.M.P.); (L.S.J.)
| | - Duarte Torres
- Faculty of Nutrition and Food Sciences, University of Porto, 4150-180 Porto, Portugal; (C.C.); (D.T.)
- EPIUnit—Institute of Public Health, University of Porto, 4050-600 Porto, Portugal; (D.C.); (C.L.)
| | - Sara M. Pires
- Division for Diet, Disease Prevention and Toxicology, The National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark; (S.T.T.); (S.M.P.); (L.S.J.)
| | - Lea S. Jakobsen
- Division for Diet, Disease Prevention and Toxicology, The National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, 2800 Kgs Lyngby, Denmark; (S.T.T.); (S.M.P.); (L.S.J.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Verhagen H, Alonso-Andicoberry C, Assunção R, Cavaliere F, Eneroth H, Hoekstra J, Koulouris S, Kouroumalis A, Lorenzetti S, Mantovani A, Menozzi D, Nauta M, Poulsen M, Rubert J, Siani A, Sirot V, Spaggiari G, Thomsen ST, Trevisan M, Cozzini P. Risk-benefit in food safety and nutrition - Outcome of the 2019 Parma Summer School. Food Res Int 2021; 141:110073. [PMID: 33641961 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Revised: 12/21/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Risk-benefit assessment is the comparison of the risk of a situation to its related benefits, i.e. a comparison of scenarios estimating the overall health impact. The risk-benefit analysis paradigm mirrors the classical risk analysis one: risk-benefit assessment goes hand-in-hand with risk-benefit management and risk-benefit communication. The various health effects associated with food consumption, together with the increasing demand for advice on healthy and safe diets, have led to the development of different research disciplines in food safety and nutrition. In this sense, there is a clear need for a holistic approach, including and comparing all of the relevant health risks and benefits. The risk-benefit assessment of foods is a valuable approach to estimate the overall impact of food on health. It aims to assess together the negative and positive health effects associated with food intake by integrating chemical and microbiological risk assessment with risk and benefit assessment in food safety and nutrition. The 2019 Parma Summer School on risk-benefit in food safety and nutrition had the objective was to provide an opportunity to learn from experts in the field of risk-benefit approach in food safety and nutrition, including theory, case studies, and communication of risk-benefit assessments plus identify challenges for the future. It was evident that whereas tools and approaches have been developed, more and more case studies have been performed which can form an inherent validation of the risk-benefit approach. Executed risk-benefit assessment case studies apply the steps and characteristics developed: a problem formulation (with at least 2 scenarios), a tiered approach until a decision can be made, one common currency to describe both beneficial and adverse effects (DALYs in most instances). It was concluded that risk-benefit assessment in food safety and nutrition is gaining more and more momentum, while also many challenges remain for the future. Risk-benefit is on the verge of really enrolling into the risk assessment and risk analysis paradigm. The interaction between risk-benefit assessors and risk-benefit managers is pivotal in this, as is the interaction with risk-benefit communicators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hans Verhagen
- University of Ulster, Northern Ireland, United Kingdom; European Food Safety Authority, Parma, Italy; Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.
| | | | - Ricardo Assunção
- National Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge, Lisbon, Portugal; CESAM, Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies, University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
| | | | | | - Jeljer Hoekstra
- National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Stefano Lorenzetti
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità - ISS, Dpt. of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Rome, Italy
| | - Alberto Mantovani
- Istituto Superiore di Sanità - ISS, Dpt. of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Josep Rubert
- CIBIO, Department of Cellular, Computational and Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Via Sommarive 9, Povo 38123, Italy; Interdisciplinary Research Structure of Biotechnology and Biomedicine, Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Universitat de Valencia, 46100 Burjassot, València, Spain
| | | | | | | | | | - Marco Trevisan
- DiSTAS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Piacenza Campus, Italy
| | - Pietro Cozzini
- University of Parma, Department of Food and Drug, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|