Pediatric Brown Adipose Tissue on 18F-FDG PET: Diazepam Intervention

An International Survey Investigating the Incidence and Management of Brown Fat Uptake on 18F-FDG PET/CT at Children's Hospitals and Interventions for Mitigation

Brown fat can present challenges in patients with cancer who undergo 18F-FDG PET scans. Uptake of 18F-FDG by brown fat can obscure or appear similar to active oncologic lesions, causing clinical challenges in PET interpretation. Small, retrospective studies have reported environmental and pharmacologic interventions for suppressing brown fat uptake on PET; however, there is no clear consensus on best practices. We sought to characterize practice patterns for strategies to mitigate brown fat uptake of 18F-FDG during PET scanning. Methods: A survey was developed and distributed via e-mail LISTSERV to members of the Children's Oncology Group diagnostic imaging committee, the Society for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging pediatric imaging council, and the Society of Chiefs of Radiology at Children's Hospitals between April 2022 and February 2023. Responses were stored anonymously in REDCap, aggregated, and summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: Fifty-five complete responses were submitted: 51 (93%) faculty and fellow-level physicians, 2 (4%) technologists, and 2 (4%) respondents not reporting their rank. There were 43 unique institutions represented, including 5 (12%) outside the United States. Thirty-eight of 41 (93%) institutions that responded on environmental interventions reported using warm blankets in the infusion and scanning rooms. Less than a third (n = 13, 30%) of institutions reported use of a pharmacologic intervention, with propranolol (n = 5, 38%) being most common, followed by fentanyl (n = 4, 31%), diazepam (n = 2, 15%), and diazepam plus propranolol (n = 2, 15%). Selection criteria for pharmacologic intervention varied, with the most common criterion being brown fat uptake on a prior scan (n = 6, 45%). Conclusion: Clinical practices to mitigate brown fat uptake on pediatric 18F-FDG PET vary widely. Simple environmental interventions including warm blankets or increasing the temperature of the injection and scanning rooms were not universally reported. Less than a third of institutions use pharmacologic agents for brown fat mitigation.

PET/CT Variants and Pitfalls in Head and Neck Cancers Including Thyroid Cancer

PET/CT imaging is a dual-modality diagnostic technology that merges metabolic and structural imaging. There are several currently available radiotracers, but ¹⁸F-FDG is the most commonly utilized due to its widespread availability. ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a cornerstone of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma imaging. ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA-TOC is another widely used radiotracer. It allows for whole-body imaging of cellular somatostatin receptors, commonly expressed by neuroendocrine tumors and is the standard of reference for the characterization and staging of neuroendocrine tumors. The normal biodistribution of these PET radiotracers as well as the technical aspects of image acquisition and inadequate patient preparation affect the quality of PET/CT imaging. In addition, normal variants, artifacts and incidental findings may impede accurate image interpretation and can potentially lead to misdiagnosis. In order to correctly interpret PET/CT imaging, it is necessary to have a comprehensive knowledge of the normal anatomy of the head and neck and to be cognizant of potential imaging pitfalls. The interpreter must be familiar with benign conditions which may accumulate radiotracer potentially mimicking neoplastic processes and also be aware of malignancies which can demonstrate low radiotracer uptake. Appropriate use of structural imaging with either CT, MR or ultrasound can serve a complimentary role in several head and neck pathologies including local tumor staging, detection of bone marrow involvement or perineural spread, and classification of thyroid nodules. It is important to be aware of the role of these complementary modalities to maximize diagnostic accuracy and patient outcomes. The purpose of this article is to outline the basic principles of PET/CT imaging, with a focus on ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ⁶⁸Ga-DOTA PET/CT. Basic physiology, variant imaging appearances and potential pitfalls of image interpretation are presented within the context of common use cases of PET technology in patients with head and neck cancers and other pathologies, benign and malignant.

SNMMI Procedure Standard/EANM Practice Guideline on Pediatric 18F-FDG PET/CT for Oncology 1.0

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional nonprofit medical association founded in 1985 to facilitate communication worldwide among individuals pursuing clinical and academic excellence in nuclear medicine. SNMMI and EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine.

The SNMMI and EANM will periodically put forth new standards/guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and improve service to patients. Existing standards/guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each standard/guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNMMI/EANM, has undergone a thorough consensus process, entailing extensive review. The SNMMI and EANM recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging requires particular training and skills, as described in each document. These standards/guidelines are educational tools designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate and effective nuclear medicine care for patients. These guidelines are consensus documents, and are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice. They are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the SNMMI and the EANM cautions against the use of these standards/guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question.

The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by medical professionals taking into account the unique circumstances of each case. Thus, there is no implication that action differing from what is laid out in the standards/guidelines, standing alone, is below standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the standards/guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the standards/guidelines.

The practice of medicine involves not only the science, but also the art of dealing with the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible for general guidelines to consistently allow for an accurate diagnosis to be reached or a particular treatment response to be predicted. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these standards/guidelines will not ensure a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner follows a reasonable course of action, based on their level of training, the current knowledge, the available resources, and the needs/context of the particular patient being treated.

PET and computerized tomography (CT) have been widely used in oncology. ¹⁸F-FDG is the most common radiotracer used for PET imaging. The purpose of this document is to provide imaging specialists and clinicians guidelines for recommending, performing, and interpreting ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric patients in oncology. There is not a high level of evidence for all recommendations suggested in this paper. These recommendations represent the expert opinions of experienced leaders in this field. Further studies are needed to have evidence-based recommendations for the application of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in pediatric oncology. These recommendations should be viewed in the context of good practice of nuclear medicine and are not intended to be a substitute for national and international legal or regulatory provisions.

PET in Pediatric Lymphoma

Although fluorodeoxyglucose PET/MR imaging is a promising new modality, there is not yet enough data to support its routine use for staging or surveillance of children with lymphoma. PET/MR imaging protocols are still under development, and its availability globally is limited. The cost-benefit of using PET/MR imaging has not yet been established, especially because annual post-treatment surveillance imaging with fluorodeoxyglucose PET is not necessary in most patients with lymphoma. Further research into the use of PET/MR imaging in pediatric oncology patients is needed with continued collaborations among institutions.