Image Quality and Diagnostic Performance of a Digital PET Prototype in Patients with Oncologic Diseases: Initial Experience and Comparison with Analog PET

Comparison of digital and analog [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for detecting post-prostatectomy biochemical recurrence in prostate cancer patients: a prospective study

Digital positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has shown enhanced sensitivity and spatial resolution compared with analog PET/CT. The present study compared the diagnostic performance of digital and analog PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate cancer patients who experienced biochemical recurrence (BCR) after prostatectomy. Forty prostate cancer patients who experienced BCR, defined as serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentrations exceeding 0.2 ng/mL after prostatectomy, were prospectively recruited. These patients were stratified into three groups based on their serum PSA levels. [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 was injected into each patient, and images were acquired using both analog and digital PET/CT scanners. Analog and digital PET/CT showed comparable lesion detection rate (71.8% vs. 74.4%), sensitivity (85.0% vs. 90.0%), and positive predictive value (PPV, 100.0% vs. 100.0%). However, digital PET/CT detected more lesions (139 vs. 111) and had higher maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax, 14.3 vs. 10.3) and higher kappa index (0.657 vs. 0.502) than analog PET/CT, regardless of serum PSA levels. On both analog and digital PET/CT, lesion detection rates and interrater agreement increased with increasing serum PSA levels. Compared with analog PET/CT, digital PET/CT detected more lesions with a higher SUVmax and better interrater agreement in prostate cancer patients who experienced BCR after prostatectomy.

Long Axial Field-of-View (LAFOV) PET/CT in Prostate Cancer

PSMA-targeted PET/CT is currently considered the most effective non-invasive diagnostic technique for imaging PSMA-positive lesions in prostate cancer (PC), and its introduction has significantly enhanced the role of nuclear medicine in both the diagnosis and therapy (theranostics) of this oncological entity. In line with developments in radiopharmaceuticals, significant progress has been made in the development of PET/CT systems. In particular, the advent of long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT scanners has represented a major leap forward in molecular imaging, with early results from clinical applications of these systems showing significant improvements over previous standard axial field-of-view systems in terms of sensitivity, image quality and lesion quantification, while enabling whole-body dynamic PET imaging. In this context, the introduction of the new LAFOV scanners may further enhance the use and potential of PSMA-ligand PET/CT in the diagnosis and management of PC. The initial but steadily growing literature on the application of the new technology in the field of PSMA-ligand PET/CT has already yielded encouraging results regarding the detection of PC lesions with high sensitivity while providing the possibility of ultra-fast or ultra-low dose examinations. Moreover, whole-body dynamic PET has rendered for the first time feasible to capture the pharmacokinetics PSMA-ligands in all major organs and most tumor lesions with high temporal resolution. The main results of these studies are presented in this review.

Transformer-CNN hybrid network for improving PET time of flight prediction

Objective.In positron emission tomography (PET) reconstruction, the integration of time-of-flight (TOF) information, known as TOF-PET, has been a major research focus. Compared to traditional reconstruction methods, the introduction of TOF enhances the signal-to-noise ratio of images. Precision in TOF is measured by full width at half maximum (FWHM) and the offset from ground truth, referred to as coincidence time resolution (CTR) and bias.Approach.This study proposes a network combining transformer and convolutional neural network (CNN) to utilize TOF information from detector waveforms, using event waveform pairs as inputs. This approach integrates the global self-attention mechanism of Transformer, which focuses on temporal relationships, with the local receptive field of CNN. The combination of global and local information allows the network to assign greater weight to the rising edges of waveforms, thereby extracting valuable temporal information for precise TOF predictions. Experiments were conducted using lutetium yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) scintillators and silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) detectors. The network was trained and tested using the waveform datasets after cropping.Main results.Compared to the constant fraction discriminator (CFD), CNN, CNN with attention, long short-term memory (LSTM) and Transformer, our network achieved an average CTR of 189 ps, reducing it by 82 ps (more than 30%), 13 ps (6.4%), 12 ps (6.0%), 16 ps (7.8%) and 9 ps (4.6%), respectively. Additionally, a reduction of 10.3, 8.7, 6.7 and 4 ps in average bias was achieved compared to CNN, CNN with attention, LSTM and Transformer.Significance.This work demonstrates the potential of applying the Transformer for PET TOF estimation using real experimental data. Through the integration of both CNN and Transformer with local and global attention, it achieves optimal performance, thereby presenting a novel direction for future research in this field.

Simultaneous evaluation of brain metastasis and thoracic cancer using semiconductor 11C-methionine PET/CT imaging

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the potential of whole-body digital 11C-methionine (MET) PET/CT imaging for simultaneous evaluation of thoracic cancer patients suspected of local recurrence (LR) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastasis.

METHODS

A total of 45 lung or breast cancer patients suspected of LR after SRS were investigated using brain and whole-body MET-PET/CT scans. We compared the tumor-to-normal ratio (TNR) and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) between patients with LR and radiation necrosis (RN) and performed receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses. We also investigated associations among extracranial recurrence, intracranial recurrence, primary site, and initial treatment type.

RESULTS

A total of 44 LR and 14 RN lesions were analyzed. In the ROC analyses for differentiating LR from RN, TNR showed higher area under the curve (AUC) (0.82) than SUVmax (0.79), and the cutoff TNR value (2.12) was higher than current cutoff values of conventional PET systems. The whole-body scans detected extracranial recurrences in 31.1% of the patients. Recurrence rates were not significantly correlated with existence of intracranial recurrence or primary site, but patients who underwent non-surgical treatment (consisting of stage III/ IV patients according to the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification or small-cell lung cancer patients) showed significantly higher recurrence than the surgically treated patients (68.8% vs. 10.3%, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In digital MET-PET/CT imaging, TNR was a more useful parameter to differentiate LR from RN than SUVmax, and the cutoff value was higher than those with conventional PET systems. Additional whole-body scans could detect extracranial recurrence and would be especially useful for advanced thoracic cancer patients who underwent non-surgical treatment.

The detection instrumentation and geometric design of clinical PET scanner: towards better performance and broader clinical applications

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a powerful medical imaging modality used in nuclear medicine to diagnose and monitor various clinical diseases in patients. It is more sensitive and produces a highly quantitative mapping of the three-dimensional biodistribution of positron-emitting radiotracers inside the human body. The underlying technology is constantly evolving, and recent advances in detection instrumentation and PET scanner design have significantly improved the medical diagnosis capabilities of this imaging modality, making it more efficient and opening the way to broader, innovative, and promising clinical applications. Some significant achievements related to detection instrumentation include introducing new scintillators and photodetectors as well as developing innovative detector designs and coupling configurations. Other advances in scanner design include moving towards a cylindrical geometry, 3D acquisition mode, and the trend towards a wider axial field of view and a shorter diameter. Further research on PET camera instrumentation and design will be required to advance this technology by improving its performance and extending its clinical applications while optimising radiation dose, image acquisition time, and manufacturing cost. This article comprehensively reviews the various parameters of detection instrumentation and PET system design. Firstly, an overview of the historical innovation of the PET system has been presented, focusing on instrumental technology. Secondly, we have characterised the main performance parameters of current clinical PET and detailed recent instrumental innovations and trends that affect these performances and clinical practice. Finally, prospects for this medical imaging modality are presented and discussed. This overview of the PET system's instrumental parameters enables us to draw solid conclusions on achieving the best possible performance for the different needs of different clinical applications.

Difference in arterial FDG accumulation in healthy study participants between digital PET/CT and standard PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the differences in FDG accumulation in arteries throughout the body between digital and standard PET/CT.

METHODS

Forty-six people who had FDG-PET examinations with a digital PET/CT scanner for health screening between April 2020 and March 2021 and had previous examinations with a standard PET/CT scanner were the study participants. FDG accumulation in arteries throughout the body was visually assessed in each segment. Scan was considered positive when arterial FDG accumulation was equal to or greater than that of the liver. The positivity rates for general arteries and each arterial segment were compared between the two kinds of scanners. If any one of the arterial segments was considered positive, the general arteries were classified as positive. Moreover, the rate of change in results from the standard PET/CT to the digital scanner in the same individual (negative to positive, positive to negative) was examined.

RESULTS

In the evaluation of general arteries, the positivity rates were 21.7% (10 cases) for the standard PET/CT, whereas positive rates were 97.8% (45 cases) for the digital PET/CT (p < 0.001). In all arterial segments, the positivity rate was significantly higher with the digital PET/CT compared to the standard PET/CT; those with the digital PET/CT were, respectively, 95.7%, 87.0%, 73.9%, 37.0%, 34.8%, and 21.7% in the femoral, brachial, aortic, subclavian, iliac, and carotid arteries. On the other hand, those with the standard PET/CT were 13.0%, 13.0%, 19.6%, 2.2%, 0%, and 4.4% in segments in the above order. Changes from negative to positive were shown in many cases; 35 cases (76.0%) of general arteries, 38 cases (82.6%) for the femoral artery, and 34 cases (73.9%) for the brachial artery. The exception was one case in which a change from positive to negative was confirmed in the carotid artery. In all arteries considered to be positive, FDG accumulation was not greater than but was equal to that in the liver with both scanners.

CONCLUSIONS

Arterial FDG accumulation was significantly higher with digital PET/CT compared to conventional PET/CT. With digital PET/CT, an arterial FDG accumulation equal to the liver may not to be considered as abnormal accumulation.

Impact of digital positron emission tomography/computed tomography on the delineation of clinical target volume in advanced lung cancer

The present study investigated the differences between digital [18F]-Fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography [PET]/computed tomography [CT] (dPET/CT) and conventional PET/CT (cPET/CT) in delineating the clinical target volume (CTV) in patients with advanced lung cancer in the involved field radiation therapy (IFRT) era. Patients with advanced lung cancer were scanned using two dual-imaging protocols (dPET/CT and cPET/CT). Two virtual delineations contoured with reference to dPET/CT and cPET/CT images were created for each patient by five radiation oncologists. Changes in the delineation of target volumes in each patient were examined. A total of 10 patients [male/female, 9/1; median age, 65 years (range, 58-80 years)] were enrolled between April 2020 and September 2020. Significant changes in the delineation of CTVs were uncommon between dPET/CT and cPET/CT. A notable increase in CTVn was observed in 10% of the patients (1/10; P<0.05; Smirnov-Grubbs analysis). In this patient, a node that was not assessed as lymph node metastasis when cPET/CT was used was assessed as lymph node metastasis when dPET/CT was used and was included in the CTVn by all five radiation oncologists. In patients with advanced lung cancer, notable changes in CTV delineations are uncommon, regardless of whether dPET/CT or cPET/CT is used. However, in some cases, CTVn delineation with reference to dPET/CT may improve the treatment outcomes of IFRT for advanced lung cancer.

Long Versus Short Axial Field of View Immuno-PET/CT: Semiquantitative Evaluation for 89Zr-Trastuzumab

The purpose of this study was to quantify any differences between the SUVs of 89Zr immuno-PET scans obtained using a PET/CT system with a long axial field of view (LAFOV; Biograph Vision Quadra) compared to a PET/CT system with a short axial field of view (SAFOV; Biograph Vision) and to evaluate how LAFOV PET scan duration affects image noise and SUV metrics. Methods: Five metastatic breast cancer patients were scanned consecutively on SAFOV and LAFOV PET/CT scanners. Four additional patients were scanned using only LAFOV PET/CT. Scans on both systems lasted approximately 30 min and were acquired 4 d after injection of 37 MBq of 89Zr-trastuzumab. LAFOV list-mode data were reprocessed to obtain images acquired using shorter scan durations (15, 10, 7.5, 5, and 3 min). Volumes of interest were placed in healthy tissues, and tumors were segmented semiautomatically to compare coefficients of variation and to perform Bland-Altman analysis on SUV metrics (SUVmax, SUVpeak, and SUVmean). Results: Using 30-min images, 2 commonly used lesion SUV metrics were higher for SAFOV than for LAFOV PET (SUVmax, 16.2% ± 13.4%, and SUVpeak, 10.1% ± 7.2%), whereas the SUVmean of healthy tissues showed minimal differences (0.7% ± 5.8%). Coefficients of variation in the liver derived from 30-min SAFOV PET were between those of 3- and 5-min LAFOV PET. The smallest SUVmax and SUVpeak differences between SAFOV and LAFOV were found for 3-min LAFOV PET. Conclusion: LAFOV 89Zr immuno-PET showed a lower SUVmax and SUVpeak than SAFOV because of lower image noise. LAFOV PET scan duration may be reduced at the expense of increasing image noise and bias in SUV metrics. Nevertheless, SUVpeak showed only minimal bias when reducing scan duration from 30 to 10 min.

Potential Clinical Impact of LAFOV PET/CT: A Systematic Evaluation of Image Quality and Lesion Detection

We performed a systematic evaluation of the diagnostic performance of LAFOV PET/CT with increasing acquisition time. The first 100 oncologic adult patients referred for 3 MBq/kg 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose PET/CT on the Siemens Biograph Vision Quadra were included. A standard imaging protocol of 10 min was used and scans were reconstructed at 30 s, 60 s, 90 s, 180 s, 300 s, and 600 s. Paired comparisons of quantitative image noise, qualitative image quality, lesion detection, and lesion classification were performed. Image noise (n = 50, 34 women) was acceptable according to the current standard of care (coefficient-of-varianceref < 0.15) after 90 s and improved significantly with increasing acquisition time (PB < 0.001). The same was seen in observer rankings (PB < 0.001). Lesion detection (n = 100, 74 women) improved significantly from 30 s to 90 s (PB < 0.001), 90 s to 180 s (PB = 0.001), and 90 s to 300 s (PB = 0.002), while lesion classification improved from 90 s to 180 s (PB < 0.001), 180 s to 300 s (PB = 0.021), and 90 s to 300 s (PB < 0.001). We observed improved image quality, lesion detection, and lesion classification with increasing acquisition time while maintaining a total scan time of less than 5 min, which demonstrates a potential clinical benefit. Based on these results we recommend a standard imaging acquisition protocol for LAFOV PET/CT of minimum 180 s to maximum 300 s after injection of 3 MBq/kg 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose.

Deep Learning Denoising Improves and Homogenizes Patient [18F]FDG PET Image Quality in Digital PET/CT

Given the constant pressure to increase patient throughput while respecting radiation protection, global body PET image quality (IQ) is not satisfactory in all patients. We first studied the association between IQ and other variables, in particular body habitus, on a digital PET/CT. Second, to improve and homogenize IQ, we evaluated a deep learning PET denoising solution (Subtle PET^TM) using convolutional neural networks. We analysed retrospectively in 113 patients visual IQ (by a 5-point Likert score in two readers) and semi-quantitative IQ (by the coefficient of variation in the liver, CV_liv) as well as lesion detection and quantification in native and denoised PET. In native PET, visual and semi-quantitative IQ were lower in patients with larger body habitus (p < 0.0001 for both) and in men vs. women (p ≤ 0.03 for CV_liv). After PET denoising, visual IQ scores increased and became more homogeneous between patients (4.8 ± 0.3 in denoised vs. 3.6 ± 0.6 in native PET; p < 0.0001). CV_liv were lower in denoised PET than in native PET, 6.9 ± 0.9% vs. 12.2 ± 1.6%; p < 0.0001. The slope calculated by linear regression of CV_liv according to weight was significantly lower in denoised than in native PET (p = 0.0002), demonstrating more uniform CV_liv. Lesion concordance rate between both PET series was 369/371 (99.5%), with two lesions exclusively detected in native PET. SUV_max and SUV_peak of up to the five most intense native PET lesions per patient were lower in denoised PET (p < 0.001), with an average relative bias of -7.7% and -2.8%, respectively. DL-based PET denoising by Subtle PET^TM allowed [¹⁸F]FDG PET global image quality to be improved and homogenized, while maintaining satisfactory lesion detection and quantification. DL-based denoising may render body habitus adaptive PET protocols unnecessary, and pave the way for the improvement and homogenization of PET modalities.

Long-axial field-of-view PET/CT: perspectives and review of a revolutionary development in nuclear medicine based on clinical experience in over 7000 patients

Recently introduced long-axial field-of-view (LAFOV) PET/CT systems represent one of the most significant advancements in nuclear medicine since the advent of multi-modality PET/CT imaging. The higher sensitivity exhibited by such systems allow for reductions in applied activity and short duration scans. However, we consider this to be just one small part of the story: Instead, the ability to image the body in its entirety in a single FOV affords insights which standard FOV systems cannot provide. For example, we now have the ability to capture a wider dynamic range of a tracer by imaging it over multiple half-lives without detrimental image noise, to leverage lower radiopharmaceutical doses by using dual-tracer techniques and with improved quantification. The potential for quantitative dynamic whole-body imaging using abbreviated protocols potentially makes these techniques viable for routine clinical use, transforming PET-reporting from a subjective analysis of semi-quantitative maps of radiopharmaceutical uptake at a single time-point to an accurate and quantitative, non-invasive tool to determine human function and physiology and to explore organ interactions and to perform whole-body systems analysis. This article will share the insights obtained from 2 years' of clinical operation of the first Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers) LAFOV system. It will also survey the current state-of-the-art in PET technology. Several technologies are poised to furnish systems with even greater sensitivity and resolution than current systems, potentially with orders of magnitude higher sensitivity. Current barriers which remain to be surmounted, such as data pipelines, patient throughput and the hindrances to implementing kinetic analysis for routine patient care will also be discussed.

Comparison of Image Quality and Quantification Parameters between Q.Clear and OSEM Reconstruction Methods on FDG-PET/CT Images in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer

We compared the image quality and quantification parameters through bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction algorithm (Q.Clear) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) algorithm for 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT scans performed for response monitoring in patients with metastatic breast cancer in prospective setting. We included 37 metastatic breast cancer patients diagnosed and monitored with 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT at Odense University Hospital (Denmark). A total of 100 scans were analyzed blinded toward Q.Clear and OSEM reconstruction algorithms regarding image quality parameters (noise, sharpness, contrast, diagnostic confidence, artefacts, and blotchy appearance) using a five-point scale. The hottest lesion was selected in scans with measurable disease, considering the same volume of interest in both reconstruction methods. SULpeak (g/mL) and SUVmax (g/mL) were compared for the same hottest lesion. There was no significant difference regarding noise, diagnostic confidence, and artefacts within reconstruction methods; Q.Clear had significantly better sharpness (p < 0.001) and contrast (p = 0.001) than the OSEM reconstruction, while the OSEM reconstruction had significantly less blotchy appearance compared with Q.Clear reconstruction (p < 0.001). Quantitative analysis on 75/100 scans indicated that Q.Clear reconstruction had significantly higher SULpeak (5.33 ± 2.8 vs. 4.85 ± 2.5, p < 0.001) and SUVmax (8.27 ± 4.8 vs. 6.90 ± 3.8, p < 0.001) compared with OSEM reconstruction. In conclusion, Q.Clear reconstruction revealed better sharpness, better contrast, higher SUVmax, and higher SULpeak, while OSEM reconstruction had less blotchy appearance.

Detection efficacy of analog [18F]FDG PET/CT, digital [18F]FDG, and [13N]NH3 PET/CT: a prospective, comparative study of patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring ground glass nodules

OBJECTIVES

This prospective study compared the detection efficacy of analog ¹⁸F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) (aF PET/CT), digital [¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT (dF PET/CT), and digital ¹³N-ammonia (¹³N-NH₃) PET/CT (dN PET/CT) for patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring ground glass nodules (GGNs).

METHODS

Eighty-seven patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring GGNs who underwent dF and dN PET/CT were enrolled. Based on the GGN component, diameter, and solid-part size, 87 corresponding patients examined using aF PET/CT were included, with age, sex, and lesion characteristics closely matched. Images were visually evaluated, and the tumor to background ratio (TBR) was used for semi-quantitative analysis.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 40 and 47 patients with pure GGNs (pGGNs) and mixed GGNs (mGGNs), respectively, were included. dF PET/CT revealed more positive lesions and higher tracer uptake in GGNs than did aF PET/CT (53/87 vs. 26/87, p < 0.05; TBR: 3.08 ± 4.85 vs. 1.42 ± 0.93, p < 0.05), especially in mGGNs (44/47 vs. 26/47, p < 0.05; TBR: 4.48 ± 6.17 vs. 1.78 ± 1.16, p < 0.05). However, dN PET/CT detected more positive lesions than did dF PET/CT (71/87 vs. 53/87, p < 0.05), especially in pGGNs (24/40 vs. 9/40, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

dF PET/CT provides superior detection efficacy over aF PET/CT for patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring GGNs, particularly mGGNs. dN PET/CT revealed superior detection efficacy over dF PET/CT, particularly in pGGNs. aF, dF, and dN PET/CT are valuable non-invasive examinations for lung cancer featuring GGNs, with dN PET/CT offering the best detection performance.

KEY POINTS

• Digital PET/CT provides superior detection efficacy over analog PET/CT in patients with lung adenocarcinoma featuring GGNs. • dN PET/CT can offer more help in the early detection of malignant GGN.

Advances in Digital PET Technology and Its Potential Impact on Myocardial Perfusion and Blood Flow Quantification

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review, we explore the development of digital PET scanners and describe the mechanism by which they work. We dive into some technical details on what differentiates a digital PET from a conventional PET scanner and how such differences lead to better imaging characteristics. Additionally, we summarize the available evidence on the improvements in the images acquired by digital PET as well as the remaining pitfalls. Finally, we report the comparative studies available on how digital PET compares to conventional PET, particularly in the quantification of coronary blood flow.

RECENT FINDINGS

The advent of digital PET offers high sensitivity and time-of-flight (TOF), which allow lower activity and scan times, with much less risk of detector saturation. This allows faster patient throughput, scanning more patients per generator, and acquiring more consistent image quality across patients. The higher sensitivity captures more of the potential artifacts, particularly motion-related ones, which presents a current challenge that still needs to be tackled. The digital silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) positron emission tomography (PET) machine has been an important development in the technological advancements of non-invasive nuclear cardiovascular imaging. It has enhanced the utility for PET myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and myocardial blood flow (MBF) quantification.

Detection of lymph node metastases in patients with prostate cancer: Comparing conventional and digital [18 F]-fluorocholine PET-CT using histopathology as a reference

BACKGROUND

Positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) with [¹⁸ F]-fluorocholine (FCH) is used to detect and stage metastatic lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer. Improvements to hardware and software have recently been made. We compared the capability of detecting regional lymph node metastases using conventional and digital silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based PET-CT technology for FCH. Extended pelvic lymph node dissection (ePLND) histopathology was used as a reference method.

METHODS

The study retrospectively examined 177 patients with intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer who had undergone staging with FCH PET-CT before ePLND. Images were obtained with either the conventional Philips Gemini PET-CT (n = 93) or the digital SiPM-based GE Discovery MI PET-CT (n = 84) and compared.

RESULTS

Images that were obtained using the Philips Gemini PET-CT system showed 19 patients (20%) with suspected lymph node metastases, whereas the GE Discovery MI PET-CT revealed 36 such patients (43%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 0.3, 0.84, 0.47, and 0.72 for the Philips Gemini, while they were 0.58, 0.62, 0.31, and 0.83 for the GE Discovery MI, respectively. The areas under the curves in a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were similar between the two PET-CT systems (0.57 for Philips Gemini and 0.58 for GE Discovery MI, p = 0.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Marked differences in sensitivity and specificity were found for the different PET-CT systems, although the overall diagnostic performance was similar. These differences are probably due to differences in both hardware and software, including reconstruction algorithms, and should be considered when new technology is introduced.

High diagnostic accuracy for lymph node metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma using PET/CT with a silicon photomultiplier

OBJECTIVE

The higher sensitivity of the new-generation positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) with silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) may increase false-positive rates in detecting metastatic lymph nodes (LNs). This study aimed to clarify the usefulness of the SiPM PET scanner in diagnosing LN metastasis of oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed consecutive F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT images of 39 SCC patients using SiPM PET and 31 SCC patients using non-SiPM PET. We measured the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) of the LNs on PET images and maximum short-axis diameter on transverse CT images.

RESULTS

The sensitivity and specificity of SiPM PET were 86.2% and 95.6%, respectively (cut-off SUV_max, 4.6). The area under the curve (AUC) of SiPM PET (0.977; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.958-0.995) was significantly higher than that of non-SiPM PET (0.825; 95% CI 0.717-0.934) (P < 0.01). In a size-limited analysis of diameter, the AUC of SiPM PET (≥ 0.96 for all diameters) was significantly higher than that of non-SiPM PET (tended to decrease as the LN diameter decreased) for the diagnosis of LN metastasis by SUV_max.

CONCLUSION

SiPM PET had higher diagnostic accuracy for LN metastasis of oral SCC than non-SiPM PET, even for small LN metastasis without increasing false-positives.

Potential Pitfall in the Interpretation of Ganglioneuronal Uptake of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Scans Performed With a High Spatial Resolution Digital PET Scanner

ABSTRACT

A 69-year-old man with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy 5 years previously and subsequent salvage radiotherapy to the prostate bed and pelvic nodes underwent PET/CT on a Siemens mCT Flow PET and a second PET/CT 10 months later on a Siemens Vision 600 Digital PET. In addition to a suspicious left hilar lymph node, the new high-resolution PET showed increased visualization and avidity of physiologic uptake in paraspinal and presacral sympathetic ganglia. Caution should be undertaken when interpreting PET/CTs performed on high-resolution digital scanners to avoid mistaking ganglia uptake for metastatic disease.

Performance of digital PET/CT compared with conventional PET/CT in oncologic patients: a prospective comparison study

PURPOSE

Digital PET systems (dPET) improve lesion detectability as compared to PET systems with conventional photomultiplier tubes (cPET). We prospectively studied the performance of high-resolution digital PET scans in patients with cancer, as compared with high- and standard-resolution conventional PET scans, taking the acquisition order into account.

METHODS

We included 212 patients with cancer, who were referred for disease staging or restaging. All patients underwent FDG-PET/CT on a dPET scanner and on a cPET scanner in a randomized order. The scans were acquired immediately after each other. Three image reconstructions were generated: 1) standard-resolution (4 × 4 × 4 mm³ voxels) cPET, 2) high-resolution (2 × 2 × 2 mm³ voxels) cPET, and 3) high-resolution dPET. Two experienced PET readers visually assessed the three reconstructions side-by-side and ranked them according to scan preference, in an independent and blinded fashion.

RESULTS

On high-resolution dPET, the PET readers detected more lesions or they had a higher diagnostic confidence than on high- and standard-resolution cPET (p < 0.001). High-resolution dPET was preferred in 90% of the cases, as compared to 44% for high-resolution cPET and 1% for standard-resolution cPET (p < 0.001). However, for the subgroup of patients where dPET was made first (n = 103, 61 ± 10 min after FDG administration) and cPET was made second (93 ± 15 min after FDG administration), no significant difference in preference was found between the high-resolution cPET and dPET reconstructions (p = 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

DPET scanners in combination with high-resolution reconstructions clinically outperform cPET scanners with both high- and standard-resolution reconstructions as the PET readers identified more FDG-avid lesions, their diagnostic confidence was increased, and they visually preferred dPET. However, when dPET was made first, high-resolution dPET and high-resolution cPET showed similar performance, indicating the positive effect of a prolonged FDG uptake time. Therefore, high-resolution cPET in combination with a prolonged FDG uptake time can be considered as an alternative.

BSREM for Brain Metastasis Detection with 18F-FDG-PET/CT in Lung Cancer Patients

The aim of the study was to analyze the use of block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) with different β-values for the detection of brain metastases in digital fluorine-18 labeled 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT in lung cancer patients. We retrospectively analyzed staging/restaging 18F-FDG PET/CT scans of 40 consecutive lung cancer patients with new brain metastases, confirmed by MRI. PET images were reconstructed using BSREM (β-values of 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700) and OSEM. Two independent blinded readers (R1 and R2) evaluated each reconstruction using a 4-point scale for general image quality, noise, and lesion detectability. SUVmax of metastases, brain background, target-to-background ratio (TBR), and contrast recovery (CR) ratio were recorded for each reconstruction. Among all reconstruction techniques, differences in qualitative parameters were analyzed using non-parametric Friedman test, while differences in quantitative parameters were compared using analysis of variances for repeated measures. Cohen's kappa (k) was used to measure inter-reader agreement. The overall detectability of brain metastases was highest for BSREM200 (R1: 2.83 ± 1.17; R2: 2.68 ± 1.32) and BSREM300 (R1: 2.78 ± 1.23; R2: 2.68 ± 1.36), followed by BSREM100, which had lower accuracy owing to noise. The highest median TBR was found for BSREM100 (R1: 2.19 ± 1.05; R2: 2.42 ± 1.08), followed by BSREM200 and BSREM300. Image quality ratings were significantly different among reconstructions (p < 0.001). The median quality score was higher for BSREM100-300, and both noise and metastases' SUVmax decreased with increasing β-value. Inter-reader agreement was particularly high for the detectability of photopenic metastases and blurring (all k > 0.65). BSREM200 and BSREM300 yielded the best results for the detection of brain metastases, surpassing both BSREM400 and OSEM, typically used in clinical practice.

A cross-scanner and cross-tracer deep learning method for the recovery of standard-dose imaging quality from low-dose PET

PURPOSE

A critical bottleneck for the credibility of artificial intelligence (AI) is replicating the results in the diversity of clinical practice. We aimed to develop an AI that can be independently applied to recover high-quality imaging from low-dose scans on different scanners and tracers.

METHODS

Brain [18F]FDG PET imaging of 237 patients scanned with one scanner was used for the development of AI technology. The developed algorithm was then tested on [18F]FDG PET images of 45 patients scanned with three different scanners, [18F]FET PET images of 18 patients scanned with two different scanners, as well as [18F]Florbetapir images of 10 patients. A conditional generative adversarial network (GAN) was customized for cross-scanner and cross-tracer optimization. Three nuclear medicine physicians independently assessed the utility of the results in a clinical setting.

RESULTS

The improvement achieved by AI recovery significantly correlated with the baseline image quality indicated by structural similarity index measurement (SSIM) (r = -0.71, p < 0.05) and normalized dose acquisition (r = -0.60, p < 0.05). Our cross-scanner and cross-tracer AI methodology showed utility based on both physical and clinical image assessment (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The deep learning development for extensible application on unknown scanners and tracers may improve the trustworthiness and clinical acceptability of AI-based dose reduction.

Impact of a PMMA tube on performances of a Vereos PET/CT system adapted for BSL-3 environment according to the NEMA NU2-2012 standard

Introduction

A Vereos PET/CT device was adapted to be compatible with the experimentation in large animals within BSL-3 environment. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of this modification on the performance according to NEMA NU2-2012 standard.

Methods

Spatial resolution, sensitivity, count rate performance, accuracies of corrections and image quality were assessed using the NEMA NU2-2012 standards before and after installation of a transparent poly-methyl methacrylate tube of 8 mm thickness, 680 mm diameter and 2800 mm long inside the tunnel of the system. In addition, CT performance tests were performed according to manufacturer standard procedure.

Results

Although the presence of the tube led to a slight decrease in sensitivity, performance measurements were in accordance with manufacturer preconisation ranges and comparable to previous performance published data.

Conclusion

Modifications of Vereos PET/CT system allowing its use in BSL-3 conditions did not affect significantly its performance according to NEMA NU2-2012 standard.

Key points

Question. Does a BSL-3 compatible modification alter Philips Vereos PET/CT performances according to NEMA NU2-2012 standards?

Pertinent findings. Our Vereos PET/CT system was modified by a wall separating BSL-1 and BSL-3 sides and an 8 mm thickness PMMA tube inserted into the bore of the camera in order to extend the BSL-3 containment along the bed movement. The performances of our modified system according to NEMA NU2-2012 standards were not significantly impacted by the modifications and were in accordance with the values prescribed by the manufacturer.

Implications for patients care. Our clinical PET/CT device was modified for human infectious diseases studies in Non-Human Primates. This unusual set up may then provide truly transposable data from preclinical studies into clinical application in infected patients.

Deep learning-assisted PET imaging achieves fast scan/low-dose examination

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of a deep learning (DL)-based denoising method on the image quality and lesion detectability of ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET) images.

METHODS

Fifty-two oncological patients undergoing an ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT imaging with an acquisition of 180 s per bed position were retrospectively included. The list-mode data were rebinned into four datasets: 100% (reference), 75%, 50%, and 33.3% of the total counts, and then reconstructed by OSEM algorithm and post-processed with the DL and Gaussian filter (GS). The image quality was assessed using a 5-point Likert scale, and FDG-avid lesions were counted to measure lesion detectability. Standardized uptake values (SUVs) in livers and lesions, liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and target-to-background ratio (TBR) values were compared between the methods. Subgroup analyses compared TBRs after categorizing lesions based on parameters like lesion diameter, uptake or patient habitus.

RESULTS

The DL method showed superior performance regarding image noise and inferior performance regarding lesion contrast in the qualitative assessment. More than 96.8% of the lesions were successfully identified in DL images. Excellent agreements on SUV in livers and lesions were found. The DL method significantly improved the liver SNR for count reduction down to 33.3% (p < 0.001). Lesion TBR was not significantly different between DL and reference images of the 75% dataset; furthermore, there was no significant difference either for lesions of > 10 mm or lesions in BMIs of > 25. For the 50% dataset, there was no significant difference between DL and reference images for TBR of lesion with > 15 mm or higher uptake than liver.

CONCLUSIONS

The developed DL method improved both liver SNR and lesion TBR indicating better image quality and lesion conspicuousness compared to GS method. Compared with the reference, it showed non-inferior image quality with reduced counts by 25-50% under various conditions.

Value of SiPM PET in myocardial perfusion imaging using Rubidium-82

BACKGROUND

PET scanners using silicon photomultipliers with digital readout (SiPM PET) have an improved temporal and spatial resolution compared to PET scanners using conventional photomultiplier tubes (PMT PET). However, the effect on image quality and visibility of perfusion defects in myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is unknown. Our aim was to determine the value of a SiPM PET scanner in MPI.

METHODS

We prospectively included 30 patients who underwent rest and regadenoson-induced stress Rubidium-82 (Rb-82) MPI on the D690 PMT PET (GE Healthcare) and within three weeks on the Vereos SiPM PET (Philips Healthcare). Two expert readers scored the image quality and assessed the existence of possible defects. In addition, interpreter's confidence, myocardial blood flow (MBF), and myocardial flow reserve (MFR) values were compared.

RESULTS

Image quality improved (P = 0.03) using the Vereos as compared to the D690. Image quality of the Vereos and the D690 was graded fair in 20% and 10%, good in 60% and 50%, and excellent in 20% and 40%, respectively. Defect interpretation and interpreter's confidence did not differ between the D690 and the Vereos (P > 0.50). There were no significant differences in rest MBF (P ≥ 0.29), stress MBF (P ≥ 0.11), and MFR (P ≥ 0.51).

CONCLUSION

SiPM PET provides an improved image quality in comparison with PMT PET. Defect interpretation, interpreter's confidence, and absolute blood flow measurements were comparable between both systems. SiPM PET is therefore a reliable technique for MPI using Rb-82.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ToetsingOnline NL63853.075.17. Registered 13 November, 2017.

[18F] Sodium Fluoride Dose Reduction Enabled by Digital Photon Counting PET/CT for Evaluation of Osteoblastic Activity

The aim of the study was to assess the quality and reproducibility of reducing the injected [¹⁸F] sodium fluoride ([¹⁸F]NaF) dose while maintaining diagnostic imaging quality in bone imaging in a preclinical skeletal model using digital photon counting PET (dPET) detector technology. Beagles (n = 9) were administered three different [¹⁸F]NaF doses: 111 MBq (n = 5), 20 MBq (n = 5), and 1.9 MBq (n = 9). Imaging started ≃45 min post-injection for ≃30 min total acquisition time. Images were reconstructed using Time-of-Flight, ultra-high definition (voxel size of 1 × 1 × 1 mm³), with 3 iterations and 3 subsets. Point spread function was modeled and Gaussian filtering was applied. Skeleton qualitative and quantitative molecular image assessment was performed. The overall diagnostic quality of all images scored excellent (61%) and acceptable (39%) by all the reviewers. [¹⁸F]NaF SUV_mean showed no statistically significant differences among the three doses in any of the region of interest assessed. This study demonstrated that a 60-fold [¹⁸F]NaF dose reduction was not significantly different from the highest dose, and it had not significant effect on overall image quality and quantitative accuracy. In the future, ultra-low dose [¹⁸F]NaF dPET/CT imaging may significantly decrease PET radiation exposure to preclinical subjects and personnel.

Compared to conventional PET/CT scanners, silicon-photomultiplier-based PET/CT scanners show higher arterial 18F-FDG uptake in whole-body 18F-FDG-PET/CT

OBJECTIVES

To clarify differences in arterial 18F-FDG (fluorodeoxyglucose) uptake between silicon photomultiplier (SiPM)-based and conventional PET/CT scanners, and to compare clinical and phantom results.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with lung tumours underwent serial SiPM-based and conventional PET/CT scans on the same day. We compared the target-to-background ratios [TBRsi (SiPM), TBRc (conventional)] and the percentage difference between TBRsi and TBRc (ΔTBR) in the carotid artery, aorta and peripheral arteries. The correlation between ΔTBR and vessel size was also investigated. In the carotid artery, active segment analyses were performed with the threshold (TBR ≥1.6), and we compared each scanner's ratio of active segments and TBR values. We compared the clinical results with the recovery coefficients (RCs).

RESULTS

The TBRsi was significantly higher than the TBRc in the carotid artery, aorta and peripheral arteries (1.63 ± 0.22 vs. 1.43 ± 0.22, 1.65 ± 0.19 vs. 1.53 ± 0.15 and 1.37 ± 0.31 vs. 1.11 ± 0.27, mean ± SD, P ≤ 0.0001 for all), and the peripheral arteries showed the highest ΔTBR (24.4 ± 16.8%). The small (10-15 mm) vessels (26.9 ± 15.9%) showed significantly higher ΔTBRs than the larger vessels (7.3 ± 8.5% for 15-20 mm, 8.0 ± 12.8% for ≥20 mm, P < 0.0001 for both). The carotid artery showed significantly higher ratios of active segment (54.5 vs. 20.5%, P < 0.0001) and TBR values (1.85 ± 0.25 vs. 1.76 ± 0.15, P = 0.0006) for TBRsi vs. TBRc. The differences in RCs were similar to those of ΔTBR for each vessel size.

CONCLUSIONS

SiPM-based PET/CT scanners showed higher arterial 18F-FDG uptake (especially in vessels <15 mm) than conventional scanners, and the threshold TBR ≥1.6 is not applicable for the carotid artery for SiPM-based PET/CT systems.

68Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT for biochemically recurrent prostate cancer: Influence of dual-time and PMT- vs SiPM-based detectors

•

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT showed high detection rates for recurrent prostate cancer.

•

Standard and new generation PET/CT performed equally on a per-patient basis.

•

Delayed imaging revealed no additional lesions.

•

SiPM-based PET/CT identified more prostate cancer lesions.

•

PSMA positivity rate increased with higher PSA levels and higher PSA velocity.

Objectives

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT is excellent for evaluating biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR PC). Here, we compared the positivity rates of dual-time point imaging using a PET/CT scanner (DMI) with silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) detectors and a PET/CT scanner (D690) with photomultiplier tubes (PMT), in patients with BCR PC.

Methods

Fifty-eight patients were prospectively recruited and randomized to receive scans on DMI followed by D690 or vice-versa. Images from DMI were reconstructed using the block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM) algorithm and images from D690 were reconstructed using ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM), according to the vendor's recommendations. Two readers independently reviewed all images in randomized order, recorded the number and location of lesions, as well as standardized uptake value (SUV) measurements.

Results

Twenty-eight patients (group A) had DMI as first scanner followed by D690, while 30 patients (group B) underwent scans in reversed order. Mean PSA was 30±112.9 (range 0.3–600.66) ng/mL for group A and 41.5 ± 213.2 (range 0.21–1170) ng/mL for group B (P = 0.796). The positivity rate in group A was 78.6% (22/28 patients) vs. 73.3% (22/30 patients) in group B. Although the performance of the two scanners was equivalent on a per-patient basis, DMI identified 5 additional sites of suspected recurrent disease when used as first scanner. The second scan time point did not reveal additional abnormal uptake.

Conclusions

The delayed time point in ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA11 PET/CT did not show a higher positivity rate. SiPM-based PET/CT identified additional lesions. Further studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm these results.

Digital PET vs Analog PET: Clinical Implications?

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique introduced in 1970s. Over the years, PET was used alone but is in 2000 when the first hybrid PET/CT device was clinically introduced. Since then, PET has continuously been marked by technological developments, being the most recent one the introduction of silicon photomultipliers (SiPMs) as an alternative to standard photomultiplier tubes used in analog PET/CT systems. SiPMs, the basis for the so called digital PET/CT systems, are smaller than standard photomultiplier tubes (enabling higher spatial resolution) and provide up to 100% coverage of the crystal area, as well as high sensitivity, low noise, and fast timing resolution. SiPMs in combination with optimized acquisition and reconstruction parameters improve the localization of the annihilation events, provide high definition PET images, and offer higher sensitivity and higher diagnostic performance. This article summarizes the evidence about the superior performance of the state of the art digital PET and highlights its potential clinical implications. Digital PET opens new perspectives in the quantification and characterization of small lesions, which are mostly undetectable using analog PET systems, potentially changing patient management and improving outcomes in oncological and non-oncological diseases. Moreover, digital PET offers the possibility to reduce radiation dose and scan times which may facilitate the implementation of PET to address unmet clinical needs.

Advances in PET-CT technology: An update

This article reviews the current evolution and future directions in PET-CT technology focusing on three areas: time of flight, image reconstruction, and data-driven gating. Image reconstruction is considered with advances in point spread function modelling, Bayesian penalised likelihood reconstruction, and artificial intelligence approaches. Data-driven gating is examined with reference to respiratory motion, cardiac motion, and head motion. For each of these technological advancements, theory will be briefly discussed, benefits of their use in routine practice will be detailed and potential future developments will be discussed. Representative clinical cases will be presented, demonstrating the huge opportunities given to the PET community by hardware and software advances in PET technology when it comes to lesion detection, disease characterization, accurate quantitation and quicker scans. Through this review, hospitals are encouraged to embrace, evaluate and appropriately implement the wide range of new PET technologies that are available now or in the near future, for the improvement of patient care.

Performance Characteristics of the Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT system with long axial field of view using the NEMA NU 2-2018 Standard

Purpose: To evaluate the performance of the Biograph Vision Quadra (Siemens Healthineers) PET/CT system. This new system is based on the Siemens Biograph Vision 600, using the same silicon photomultiplier-based detectors with 3.2×3.2×20-mm lutetium-oxoorthosilicate crystals. The Quadra's 32 detector rings provide a fourfold larger axial field of view (AFOV) of 106 cm, enabling imaging of major organs in one bed position. Methods: Physical performance of the scanner was evaluated according to the National Electrical Manufacturers Association NU 2-2018 standard with additional experiments to characterize energy resolution. Image quality was assessed with foreground to background ratios of 4:1 and 8:1. Additionally, a clinical ¹⁸F-FDG-PET study was reconstructed with varying frame durations. In all experiments, data were acquired using the Quadra's maximum ring distance of 322 crystals (MRD 322), while image reconstructions could only be performed with a maximum ring distance of 85 crystals rings (MRD 85). Results: The spatial resolution at full width half maximum in radial, tangential and axial directions were 3.3, 3.4 and 3.8 mm respectively. The sensitivity was 83 cps/kBq for MRD 85 and 176 cps/kBq for MRD 322. The NECRs at peak were 1613 kcps for MRD 85 and 2956 kcps for MRD 322, both at 27.5 kBq/mL. The respective scatter fractions at peak NECR equaled 36 % and 37 %. The TOF resolution at peak NECR was 228 ps for MRD 85 and 230 ps for MRD 322. Image contrast recovery ranged from 69.6% to 86.9 % for 4:1 contrast ratios and from 77.7 % to 92.6 % for 8:1 contrast ratios reconstructed using PSF-TOF with 8 iterations and 5 subsets. Thirty seconds frames provided readable lesion detectability and acceptable noise levels in clinical images. Conclusion: The Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT has similar spatial and time resolution compared to the Biograph Vision 600 but exhibits improved sensitivity and NECR due to its extended AFOV. The reported spatial resolution, time resolution, and sensitivity makes it a competitive new device in the class of PET-scanners with extended AFOV.

Differences among [18F]FDG PET-derived parameters in lung cancer produced by three software packages

Investigation of differences in derived [18F]FDG PET metabolic and volumetric parameters among three different software programs in lung cancer. A retrospective analysis was performed on a group of 98 lung cancer patients who underwent a baseline [18F]FDG PET/CT study. To assess appropriate delineation methods, the NEMA phantom study was first performed using the following software: Philips EBW (Extended Brilliance Workstation), MIM Software and Rover. Based on this study, the best cut-off methods (dependent on tumour size) were selected, extracted and applied for lung cancer delineation. Several semiquantitative [18F]FDG parameters (SUVmax, SUVmean, TLG and MTV) were assessed and compared among the three software programs. The parameters were assessed based on body weight (BW), lean body mass (LBM) and Bq/mL. Statistically significant differences were found in SUVmean (LBM) between MIM Software and Rover (4.62 ± 2.15 vs 4.84 ± 1.20; p < 0.005), in SUVmean (Bq/mL) between Rover and Philips EBW (21,852.30 ± 21,821.23 vs 19,274.81 ± 13,340.28; p < 0.005) and Rover and MIM Software (21,852.30 ± 21,821.23 vs 19,399.40 ± 10,051.30; p < 0.005), and in MTV between MIM Software and Philips EBW (19.87 ± 25.83 vs 78.82 ± 228.00; p = 0.0489). This study showed statistically significant differences in the estimation of semiquantitative parameters using three independent image analysis tools. These findings are important for performing further diagnostic and treatment procedures in lung cancer patients.

Clinical performance of long axial field of view PET/CT: a head-to-head intra-individual comparison of the Biograph Vision Quadra with the Biograph Vision PET/CT

PURPOSE

To investigate the performance of the new long axial field-of-view (LAFOV) Biograph Vision Quadra PET/CT and a standard axial field-of-view (SAFOV) Biograph Vision 600 PET/CT (both: Siemens Healthineers) system using an intra-patient comparison.

METHODS

Forty-four patients undergoing routine oncological PET/CT were prospectively included and underwent a same-day dual-scanning protocol following a single administration of either 18F-FDG (n = 20), 18F-PSMA-1007 (n = 16) or 68Ga-DOTA-TOC (n = 8). Half the patients first received a clinically routine examination on the SAFOV (FOVaxial 26.3 cm) in continuous bed motion and then immediately afterwards on the LAFOV system (10-min acquisition in list mode, FOVaxial 106 cm); the second half underwent scanning in the reverse order. Comparisons between the LAFOV at different emulated scan times (by rebinning list mode data) and the SAFOV were made for target lesion integral activity, signal to noise (SNR), target lesion to background ratio (TBR) and visual image quality.

RESULTS

Equivalent target lesion integral activity to the SAFOV acquisitions (16-min duration for a 106 cm FOV) were obtained on the LAFOV in 1.63 ± 0.19 min (mean ± standard error). Equivalent SNR was obtained by 1.82 ± 1.00 min LAFOV acquisitions. No statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) in TBR were observed even for 0.5 min LAFOV examinations. Subjective image quality rated by two physicians confirmed the 10 min LAFOV to be of the highest quality, with equivalence between the LAFOV and the SAFOV at 1.8 ± 0.85 min. By analogy, if the LAFOV scans were maintained at 10 min, proportional reductions in applied radiopharmaceutical could obtain equivalent lesion integral activity for activities under 40 MBq and equivalent doses for the PET component of <1 mSv.

CONCLUSION

Improved image quality, lesion quantification and SNR resulting from higher sensitivity were demonstrated for an LAFOV system in a head-to-head comparison under clinical conditions. The LAFOV system could deliver images of comparable quality and lesion quantification in under 2 min, compared to routine SAFOV acquisition (16 min for equivalent FOV coverage). Alternatively, the LAFOV system could allow for low-dose examination protocols. Shorter LAFOV acquisitions (0.5 min), while of lower visual quality and SNR, were of adequate quality with respect to target lesion identification, suggesting that ultra-fast or low-dose acquisitions can be acceptable in selected settings.

Focal unspecific bone uptake on [18F]-PSMA-1007 PET: a multicenter retrospective evaluation of the distribution, frequency, and quantitative parameters of a potential pitfall in prostate cancer imaging

Purpose

Improved logistics and availability led to a rapid increase in the use of [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 for prostate cancer PET imaging. Initial data suggests increased uptake in benign lesions compared to [⁶⁸ Ga]-PSMA-11, and clinical observations found increased unspecific bone uptake (UBU). We therefore investigate the frequency and characteristics of UBU in [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 PET.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 PET scans from four centers for the presence of UBU, defined as a focal mild-to-moderate uptake (SUV_max < 10.0) not obviously related to a benign or malignant cause. If present, up to three leading UBUs were quantified (SUV_max), localized, and correlated to clinical parameters, such as age, PSA, injected dose, Gleason score, tumor size (T1–T4), and type of PET scanner (analog vs. digital). Additionally, clinical and imaging follow-up results and therapeutic impact were evaluated.

Results

UBUs were identified in 179 out of 348 patients (51.4%). The most frequent localizations were ribs (57.5%) and pelvis (24.8%). The frequency of UBUs was not associated with PSA, Gleason score, tumor size, age, or the injected [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 dose. UBUs were significantly more frequent in images obtained with digital PET/CT scans (n = 74, 82%) than analog PET/CT scans (n = 221, 40.3%) (p = .0001) but not in digital PET/MR (n = 53, 51%) (p = .1599). In 80 out of 179 patients (44.7%), the interpretation of UBUs was critical for therapeutic management and therefore considered clinically relevant. For 65 UBUs, follow-ups were available: three biopsies, three radiotherapies with PSA follow-up, and 59 cases with imaging. After follow-up, UBUs were still considered unclear in 28 of 65 patients (43%), benign in 28 (43%), and malignant in nine (14%) patients.

Conclusion

UBUs occur in two-thirds of patients imaged with [¹⁸F]-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and are significantly more frequent on digital PET scanners than analog scanners. UBUs should be interpreted carefully to avoid over-staging.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05424-x.

The influence of colour scale in lesion detection and patient-based sensitivity in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET/CT

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the influence of colour scales on the interpretation of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer.

METHODS

50 consecutive patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer were selected for this retrospective study. The scans were randomised, anonymised and read by five different readers first in the visually nonlinear colour scale 'PET-rainbow'. Scans were then rerandomised and read in the visually linear colour scale 'hot-metal new'. For each scan in each colour scale the numbers of pathological, equivocal and benign lesions were noted. Scans where the majority of readers (≥3) reported at least one PET-positive lesion were recorded as 'pathological'. Patient-level sensitivity was obtained by composite standard with 14.8 ± 1.2 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Increased numbers of lesions per patient were reported for all readers in PET-rainbow compared to hot-metal new (37.4 ± 15.2 vs. 33.9 ± 16.4, respectively, P = 0.0005). On a per-patient basis, 43 scans were rated pathological in PET-rainbow, compared to 39 in hot-metal new. Follow-up was available for 30 patients confirming 26 pathological scans with positive follow-up in PET-rainbow, and 23 in hot-metal new. Three pathological scans were missed in hot-metal new. Patient-level sensitivity was higher for PET-rainbow (0.96) compared to hot-metal new (0.85). Inter-reader reliability was higher for hot-metal new (Fleiss κ = 0.76) compared to PET-rainbow (Fleiss κ = 0.60).

CONCLUSION

Use of PET-rainbow was associated with improved lesion detection and sensitivity compared to hot-metal new, although at cost of reduced inter-rater agreement. Consequently, the use of PET-rainbow for clinical routine and future studies involving [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is recommended.

A Preliminary Study to Use SUVmax of FDG PET-CT as an Identifier of Lesion for Artificial Intelligence

Background: Diagnostic reports contribute not only to the particular patient, but also to constructing massive training dataset in the era of artificial intelligence (AI). The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is often described in daily diagnostic reports of [¹⁸F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) - computed tomography (CT). If SUVmax can be used as an identifier of lesion, that would greatly help AI interpret diagnostic reports. We aimed to clarify whether the lesion can be localized using SUVmax strings. Methods: The institutional review board approved this retrospective study. We investigated a total of 112 lesions from 30 FDG PET-CT images acquired with 3 different scanners. SUVmax was calculated from DICOM files based on the latest Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) publication. The voxels showing the given SUVmax were exhaustively searched in the whole-body images and counted. SUVmax was provided with 5 different degrees of precision: integer (e.g., 3), 1st decimal places (DP) (3.1), 2nd DP (3.14), 3rd DP (3.142), and 4th DP (3.1416). For instance, when SUVmax = 3.14 was given, the voxels with 3.135 ≤ SUVmax < 3.145 were extracted. We also evaluated whether local maximum restriction could improve the identifying performance, where only the voxels showing the highest intensity within some neighborhood were considered. We defined that "identical detection" was achieved when only single voxel satisfied the criterion. Results: A total of 112 lesions from 30 FDG PET-CT images were investigated. SUVmax ranged from 1.3 to 49.1 (median = 5.6). Generally, when larger and more precise SUVmax values were given, fewer voxels satisfied the criterion. The local maximum restriction was very effective. When SUVmax was determined to 4 decimal places (e.g., 3.1416) and the local maximum restriction was applied, identical detection was achieved in 33.3% (lesions with SUVmax < 2), 79.5% (2 ≤ SUVmax < 5), and 97.8% (5 ≤ SUVmax) of lesions. Conclusion: In this preliminary study, SUVmax of FDG PET-CT could be used as an identifier to localize the lesion if precise SUVmax is provided and local maximum restriction was applied, although the lesions showing SUVmax < 2 were difficult to identify. The proposed method may have potential to make use of diagnostic reports retrospectively for constructing training datasets for AI.

The influence of digital PET/CT on diagnostic certainty and interrater reliability in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer

Objective

To investigate the impact of digital PET/CT on diagnostic certainty, patient-based sensitivity and interrater reliability.

Methods

Four physicians retrospectively evaluated two matched cohorts of patients undergoing [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on a digital (dPET/CT n = 65) or an analogue scanner (aPET/CT n = 65) for recurrent prostate cancer between 11/2018 and 03/2019. The number of equivocal and pathological lesions as well as the frequency of discrepant findings and the interrater reliability for the two scanners were compared.

Results

dPET/CT detected more lesions than aPET/CT (p < 0.001). A higher number of pathological scans were observed for dPET/CT (83% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). The true-positive rate at follow-up was 100% for dPET/CT compared to 84% for aPET/CT (p < 0.001). The proportion of lesions rated as non-pathological as a total of all PSMA-avid lesions detected for dPET/CT was comparable to aPET/CT (61.8% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.99). Neither a higher rate of diagnostically uncertain lesions (11.5% dPET/CT vs. 13.7% aPET/CT, p = 0.95) nor discrepant scans (where one or more readers differed in opinion as to whether the scan is pathological) were observed (18% dPET/CT vs. 17% aPET/CT, p = 0.76). Interrater reliability for pathological lesions was excellent for both scanner types (Cronbach’s α = 0.923 dPET/CT; α = 0.948 aPET/CT) and interrater agreement was substantial for dPET/CT (Krippendorf’s α = 0.701) and almost perfect in aPET/CT (α = 0.802).

Conclusions

A higher detection rate for pathological lesions for dPET/CT compared with aPET/CT in multiple readers was observed. This improved sensitivity was coupled with an improved true-positive rate and was not associated with increased diagnostic uncertainty, rate of non-specific lesions, or reduced interrater reliability.

Key Points

• New generation digital scanners detect more cancer lesions in men with prostate cancer.

• When using digital scanners, the doctors are able to diagnose prostate cancer lesions with better certainty

• When using digital scanners, the doctors do not disagree with each other more than with other scanner types.

Digital PET/CT allows for shorter acquisition protocols or reduced radiopharmaceutical dose in [18F]-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE

To establish the feasibility of shorter acquisition times (and by analogy, applied activity) on tumour detection and lesion contrast in digital PET/CT.

METHODS

Twenty-one randomly selected patients who underwent oncological [18F]-FDG PET/CT on a digital PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. Scan data were anonymously obtained and reconstructed in list-mode acquisition for a standard 2 min/bed position (bp), 1 min/bp and 30 s/bp (100%, 50% and 25% time or applied activity, respectively). Scans were randomized and read by two nuclear medicine physicians in a consensus read. Readers were blind to clinical details. Scans were evaluated for the number of pathological lesions detected. Measured uptake for lesions was evaluated by maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively) and tumour-to-backround ratio (TBR) were compared. Agreement between the three acquisitions was compared by Krippendorf's alpha.

RESULTS

Overall n = 100 lesions were identified in the 2 min and 1 min/bp acquisitions and n = 98 lesions in the 30 s/bp acquisitions. Agreement between the three acquisitions with respect to lesion number and tumour-to-background ratio showed almost perfect agreement (K's α = 0.999). SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR likewise showed > 98% agreement, with longer acquisitions being associated with slightly higher mean TBR (2 min/bp 7.94 ± 4.41 versus 30 s/bp 7.84 ± 4.22, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Shorter acquisition times have traditionally been associated with reduced lesion detectability or the requirement for larger amounts of radiotracer activity. These data confirm that this is not the case for new-generation digital PET scanners, where the known higher sensitivity results in clinically adequate images for shorter acquisitions. Only a small variation in the semi-quantitative parameters SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR was seen, confirming that either reduction of acquisition time or (by analogy) applied activity can be reduced as much as 75% in digital PET/CT without apparent clinical detriment.

Digital versus analog PET/CT in patients with known or suspected liver metastases

AIM

To assess if digital PET/CT improves liver lesion detectability compared to analog PET/CT in patients with known or suspected liver metastases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We prospectively included 83 cancer patients, with one or more of these conditions: history of liver metastases, clinical risk of having liver metastases or presence of suspected liver metastases on the first of the two PET/CTs. All patients were consecutively scanned on each PET/CT on the same day after a single [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose dose injection. The order of acquisition was randomly assigned. Three nuclear medicine physicians assessed both PET/CTs by counting the foci of high uptake suspicious of liver metastases. Findings were correlated with appropriate reference standards; 19 patients were excluded from the analysis due to insufficient lesion nature confirmation. The final sample consisted of 64 patients (34 women, mean age 68 ± 12 years).

RESULTS

As per-patient analysis, the mean number of liver lesions detected by the digital PET/CT (3.84 ± 4.25) was significantly higher than that detected by the analog PET/CT (2.91 ± 3.31); P < 0.001. Fifty-five patients had a positive PET/CT study for liver lesions. In 26/55 patients (47%), the digital PET/CT detected more lesions; 7/26 patients (27%) had detectable lesions only by the digital system and had <10 mm of diameter. Twenty-nine patients had the same number of liver lesions detected by both systems. In nine patients both PET/CT systems were negative for liver lesions.

CONCLUSION

Digital PET/CT offers improved detectability of liver lesions over the analog PET/CT in patients with known or suspected liver metastases.

Head-to-head comparison of a Si-photomultiplier-based and a conventional photomultiplier-based PET-CT system

BACKGROUND

A novel generation of PET scanners based on silicon (Si)-photomultiplier (PM) technology has recently been introduced. Concurrently, there has been development of new reconstruction methods aimed at increasing the detectability of small lesions without increasing image noise. The combination of new detector technologies and new reconstruction algorithms has been found to increase image quality. However, it is unknown to what extent the demonstrated improvement of image quality is due to scanner hardware development or improved reconstruction algorithms. To isolate the contribution of the hardware, this study aimed to compare the ability to detect small hotspots in phantoms using the latest generation SiPM-based PET/CT scanner (GE Discovery MI) relative to conventional PM-based PET/CT scanner (GE Discovery 690), using identical reconstruction protocols.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two different phantoms (NEMA body and Jasczcak) with fillable spheres (31 μl to 26.5 ml) and varying sphere-to-background-ratios (SBR) were scanned in one bed position for 15-600 s on both scanners. The data were reconstructed using identical reconstruction parameters on both scanners. The recovery-coefficient (RC), noise level, contrast (sphere_peak/background_peak-value), and detectability of each sphere were calculated and compared between the scanners at each acquisition time.

RESULTS

The RC-curves for the NEMA phantom were near-identical for both scanners at SBR 10:1. For smaller spheres in the Jaszczak phantom, the contrast was 1.22 higher for the DMI scanner at SBR 15:1. The ratio decreased for lower SBR, with a ratio of 1.03 at SBR 3.85:1. Regarding the detectability of spheres, the sensitivity was 98% and 88% for the DMI and D690, respectively, for SBR 15:1. For SBR 7.5, the sensitivity was 75% and 83% for the DMI and D690, respectively. For SBR 3.85:1, the sensitivity was 43% and 30% for the DMI and D690, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Marginally higher contrast in small spheres was seen for the SiPM-based scanner but there was no significant difference in detectability between the scanners. It was difficult to detect differences between the scanners, suggesting that the SiPM-based detectors are not the primary reason for improved image quality.

Assessment of Image Quality and Lesion Detectability With Digital PET/CT System

Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess image quality and lesion detectability acquired with a digital Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography (PET/CT) Siemens Biograph Vision 600 system.

Material and Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent a FDG PET/CT during the first week of use of a digital PET/CT (Siemens Biograph Vision 600) at the nuclear medicine department of the university hospital of Brest were analyzed. PET were realized using list mode acquisition. For all patients, 4 datasets were reconstructed. We determined, according to phantom measurements, an equivalent time acquisition/reconstruction parameters pair of the digital PET/CT corresponding to an analog PET/CT image quality (“analog-like”) as reference dataset. We compared the reference dataset with 3 others digital PET/CT reconstruction parameters, allowing a decrease of emission duration: 60, 90, and 120 s per bed position. Three nuclear medicine physicians evaluated independently, for each dataset, overall image quality [Maximal Intensity Projection (MIP), noise, sharpness] using a 4-point scale. Physicians assessed also lesion detection capability by reporting new visible lesions on each digital datasets with their confidence level in comparison with analog-like dataset.

Results: Ninety-eight patients were analyzed. Image quality of MIP (IQ_MIP), sharpness (IQ_SHARPNESS), and noise (IQ_NOISE) of all digital datasets (60, 90, and 120 s) were better than those evaluated with analog-like reconstruction. Moreover, digital PET/CT system improved IQ_MIP, IQ_NOISE, and IQ_SHARPNESS whatever the BMI. Lesion detection capability and confidence level were higher for 60, 90, 120 s per bed position, respectively, than for analog-like images.

Conclusion: Our study demonstrated an improvement of image quality and lesion detectability with a digital PET/CT system.

Fully digital PET is unaffected by any deterioration in TOF resolution and TOF image quality in the wide range of routine PET count rates

PURPOSE

Digital PET involving silicon photomultipliers (SiPM) provides an enhanced time-of-flight (TOF) resolution as compared with photomultiplier (PMT)-based PET, but also a better prevention of the count-related rises in dead time and pile-up effects mainly due to smaller trigger domains (i.e., the detection surfaces associated with each trigger circuit). This study aimed to determine whether this latter property could help prevent against deteriorations in TOF resolution and TOF image quality in the wide range of PET count rates documented in clinical routine.

METHODS

Variations, according to count rates, in timing resolution and in TOF-related enhancement of the quality of phantom images were compared between the first fully digital PET (Vereos) and a PMT-based PET (Ingenuity). Single-count rate values were additionally extracted from the list-mode data of routine analog- and digital-PET exams at each 500-ms interval, in order to determine the ranges of routine PET count rates.

RESULTS

Routine PET count rates were lower for the Vereos than for the Ingenuity. For Ingenuity, the upper limits were estimated at approximately 21.7 and 33.2 Mcps after injection of respectively 3 and 5 MBq.kg^-1 of current ¹⁸F-labeled tracers. At 5.8 Mcps, corresponding to the lower limit of the routine count rates documented with the Ingenuity, timing resolutions provided by the scatter phantom were 326 and 621 ps for Vereos and Ingenuity, respectively. At higher count rates, timing resolution was remarkably stable for Vereos but exhibited a progressive deterioration for Ingenuity, respectively reaching 732 and 847 ps at the upper limits of 21.7 and 33.2 Mcps. The averaged TOF-related gain in signal/noise ratio was stable at approximately 2 for Vereos but decreased from 1.36 at 5.8 Mcps to 1.14 and 1.00 at respectively 21.7 and 33.2 Mcps for Ingenuity.

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the Ingenuity PMT-based PET, the Vereos fully digital PET is unaffected by any deterioration in TOF resolution and consequently, in the quality of TOF images, in the wide range of routine PET count rates. This advantage is even more striking with higher count-rates for which the preferential use of digital PET should be further recommended (i.e., dynamic PET recording, higher injected activities).

Added Value of Digital over Analog PET/CT: More Significant as Image Field of View and Body Mass Index Increase

The digital PET/CT scanner with digital photon-counting technique promises a shorter scan time, improved small-lesion detectability, and reduced radiation dose for the PET and CT portions of the exam while improving image quality. Methods: In this single-institution retrospective review study, 84 participants who had undergone PET/CT on both analog and digital scanners were analyzed. The aim was to evaluate the impact of image field of view (FOV) and body mass index (BMI) on the digital compared with the analog PET/CT scanners. The participants were categorized into different groups based on their BMI. Total scan times, ¹⁸F-FDG doses, and dose-length products (DLP) were collected and compared. Image quality was also assessed by certified nuclear medicine physicians and graded on a scale from 1 to 5. Results: In the skull-to-mid-thigh FOVs, the digital scanner had a scan time shorter by 37% (P < 0.001), a ¹⁸F-FDG dose lower by 16% (P < 0.001), but only an 8% reduction in DLP (P = 0.2). In the head-to-toe FOV cases, the digital scanner showed reductions in scan time (33%; P < 0.001), ¹⁸F-FDG dose (13%; P < 0.001), and DLP (19%; P < 0.001). When BMI was accounted for, the digital scanner had a scan time shorter by 33% (P < 0.001), as well as a reduced DLP (P < 0.001) and ¹⁸F-FDG dose (P < 0.001), with the most prominent changes being in the overweight and obese participants. Image quality was also improved by the digital scanner, with a score of 4.5, versus 4.0 for the analog scanner. Conclusion: The digital scanner has a shorter scan time and lower DLP, requires a lower ¹⁸F-FDG dose, and provides improved image quality when compared with the analog scanner. The most impactful difference in scan time, DLP, and ¹⁸F-FDG dose were observed in obese and overweight participants.

Comparison of Image Quality and Semi-quantitative Measurements with Digital PET/CT and Standard PET/CT from Different Vendors

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the concordance and equivalence of results between the newly acquired digital PET/CT(dPET) and the standard PET/CT (sPET) to investigate possible differences in visual and semi-quantitative analyses.

Methods

A total of 30 participants were enrolled and underwent a single ¹⁸F-FDG injection followed by dual PET/CT scans, by a dPET scan, and immediately after by the sPET scan or vice versa. Two readers reviewed overall image quality using a 5-point scale and counted the number of suggestive ¹⁸F-FDG avid lesions. The SUV values were measured in the background organs and in hypermetabolic target lesions. Additionally, we objectively evaluated image quality using the liver signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).

Results

The dPET identified 4 additional ¹⁸F-FDG avid lesions in 3 of 30 participants with improved visual image quality. The standard deviations of SUV of the background organs were significantly lower with Digital_PET than with sPET, and dPET could acquire images with better SNR (11.13 ± 2.01 vs. 8.71 ± 1.32, P < 0.001). The reliability of SUV values between scanners showed excellent agreement. Bland-Altman plot analysis of 81 lesions showed an acceptable agreement between scanners for most of the SUVmax and SUVpeak values. No relationship between the SUV values and time delays of dual PET/CT acquisition was found.

Conclusions

The dPET provides improved image quality and lesion detectability than the sPET. The semi-quantitative values of the two PET/CT systems of different vendors are comparable. This pilot study will be an important basis for possible interchangeable use of either system in clinical practice.

Machine learning in quantitative PET: A review of attenuation correction and low-count image reconstruction methods

The rapid expansion of machine learning is offering a new wave of opportunities for nuclear medicine. This paper reviews applications of machine learning for the study of attenuation correction (AC) and low-count image reconstruction in quantitative positron emission tomography (PET). Specifically, we present the developments of machine learning methodology, ranging from random forest and dictionary learning to the latest convolutional neural network-based architectures. For application in PET attenuation correction, two general strategies are reviewed: 1) generating synthetic CT from MR or non-AC PET for the purposes of PET AC, and 2) direct conversion from non-AC PET to AC PET. For low-count PET reconstruction, recent deep learning-based studies and the potential advantages over conventional machine learning-based methods are presented and discussed. In each application, the proposed methods, study designs and performance of published studies are listed and compared with a brief discussion. Finally, the overall contributions and remaining challenges are summarized.

High detection sensitivity and reliable morphological correlation of PET with a silicon photomultiplier for primary tongue squamous cell carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

A positron emission tomography (PET) scanner using a silicon photomultiplier (SiPM PET) in place of a photomultiplier tube significantly improves the spatial and time resolution. It may also improve the evaluation of smaller lesions compared to conventional (non-SiPM) PET scanners. We compared the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max), detection sensitivity, and morphological correlation using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for primary tongue squamous cell carcinoma between the SiPM PET and non-SiPM PET scanner.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT features of tongue squamous cell carcinomas in consecutive, newly diagnosed, and pathologically verified patients. Twenty-five of 46 patients were scanned using SiPM PET scanner and the remaining 21 patients were scanned with a non-SiPM PET scanner. We compared the SUV_max and visual evaluation of primary tumor detectability, and the correlation between the PET-based and MRI-based tumor size (long axis, thickness, and volume). Differences in SUV_max and detection sensitivity for the primary tumor were analyzed using Welch's t test and Fisher's exact test, respectively. Correlations among the PET-based, MRI-based tumor size, and SUV_max were assessed using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient.

RESULTS

SUV_max of both T1/T2 and T3/T4 primary tumors were significantly higher for the SiPM PET (T1/T2 mean SUV_max: 6.6 ± 4.3, T3/T4 mean SUV_max: 18.2 ± 9.8) than that for the non-SiPM PET (T1/T2 mean SUV_max: 3.4 ± 1.4, T3/T4 mean SUV_max: 10.2 ± 4.9) (P < 0.05). While all cases of T3/T4 primary tumors were detected by both PET scanners, the detection sensitivity for T1/T2 primary tumors was significantly higher for the SiPM PET (80%) than that for the non-SiPM PET (36.4%) (P < 0.05). MRI-based tumor size correlated significantly with SiPM PET-based tumor long axis (ρ = 0.74) and volume (ρ = 0.91), but not with the non-SiPM PET-based tumor long axis and volume in T1/T2 primary lesions. Correlation between MRI-based tumor size and SUV_max was significant in both PET scanners; however, no significant difference was observed between the two scanners.

CONCLUSIONS

The SiPM PET provides better detection sensitivity and a reliable morphological correlation for the T1/T2 primary tongue tumors than the non-SiPM PET due to its high performance.

Monte Carlo simulation of digital photon counting PET

A GATE Monte Carlo model of the Philips Vereos digital photon counting PET imaging system using silicon photo-multiplier detectors was proposed. It was evaluated against experimental data in accordance with NEMA guidelines. Comparisons were performed using listmode data in order to remain independent of image reconstruction algorithms. An original line of response-based method is proposed to estimate intrinsic spatial resolution without reconstruction. Four sets of experiments were performed: (1) count rates and scatter fraction, (2) energy and timing resolutions, (3) sensitivity, and (4) intrinsic spatial resolution. Experimental and simulated data were found to be in good agreement, with overall differences lower than 10% for activity concentrations used in most standard clinical applications. Illustrative image reconstructions were provided. In conclusion, the proposed Monte Carlo model was validated and can be used for numerous studies such as optimizing acquisition parameters or reconstruction algorithms.

Head-to-head comparison between digital and analog PET of human and phantom images when optimized for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio from small lesions

Background

Routine PET exams are increasingly performed with reduced injected activities, leading to the use of different image reconstruction parameters than the NEMA parameters, in order to prevent from any deleterious decrease in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thus, in lesion detectability. This study aimed to provide a global head-to-head comparison between digital (Vereos, Philips®) and analog (Ingenuity TF, Philips®) PET cameras of the trade-off between SNR and contrast through a wide-ranging number of reconstruction iterations, and with a further reconstruction optimization based on the SNR of small lesions.

Methods

Image quality parameters were compared between the two cameras on human and phantom images for a number of OSEM reconstruction iterations ranging from 1 to 10, the number of subsets being fixed at 10, and with the further identification of reconstruction parameters maximizing the SNR of spheres and adenopathies nearing 10 mm in diameter. These reconstructions were additionally obtained with and without time-of-flight (TOF) information (TOF and noTOF images, respectively) for further comparisons.

Results

On both human and phantom TOF images, the compromise between SNR and contrast was consistently more advantageous for digital than analog PET, with the difference being particularly pronounced for the lowest numbers of iterations and the smallest spheres. SNR was maximized with 1 and 2 OSEM iterations for the TOF images from digital and analog PET, respectively, whereas 4 OSEM iterations were required for the corresponding noTOF images from both cameras. On the TOF images obtained with this SNR optimization, digital PET exhibited a 37% to 44% higher SNR as compared with analog PET, depending on sphere size. These relative differences were however much lower for the noTOF images optimized for SNR (− 4 to + 18%), as well as for images reconstructed according to NEMA standards (− 4 to + 12%).

Conclusion

SNR may be dramatically higher for digital PET than for analog PET, especially when optimized for small lesions. This superiority is mostly attributable to enhanced TOF resolution and is significantly underestimated in NEMA-based analyses.