1
|
Naik M, Khan SR, Lewington V, Challapalli A, Eccles A, Barwick TD. Imaging and therapy in prostate cancer using prostate specific membrane antigen radioligands. Br J Radiol 2024; 97:1391-1404. [PMID: 38733571 PMCID: PMC11256943 DOI: 10.1093/bjr/tqae092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/03/2024] [Indexed: 05/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) directed PET imaging has rapidly transformed prostate cancer workup over the past decade and paved the way for a theranostic approach using 177Lu-labelled PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT). This review gives an overview of the underlying principles behind PSMA as a target; the current use of PSMA PET in prostate cancer imaging and benefits compared to conventional imaging; and therapeutic applications including optimisation of patient selection. It also explores the evidence base of PSMA PET for other indications not in routine clinical use and the future of PSMA-directed RLT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitesh Naik
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom
| | - Sairah R Khan
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom
| | - Valerie Lewington
- Division of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, Kings College London, London WC2R 2LS, United Kingdom
| | - Amarnath Challapalli
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Bristol Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol BS2 8ED, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Eccles
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom
| | - Tara D Barwick
- Imaging Department, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London W12 0HS, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Al Saffar H, Chen DC, Delgado C, Ingvar J, Hofman MS, Lawrentschuk N, Perera M, Murphy DG, Eapen R. The Current Landscape of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Imaging Biomarkers for Aggressive Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:939. [PMID: 38473301 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2024] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
The review examines the vital role of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) in the diagnosis, staging, and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). It focuses on the superior diagnostic abilities of PSMA PET/CT for identifying both nodal and distant PCa, and its potential as a prognostic indicator for biochemical recurrence and overall survival. Additionally, we focused on the variability of PSMA's expression and its impact on personalised treatment, particularly the use of [177Lu] Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy. This review emphasises the essential role of PSMA PET/CT in enhancing treatment approaches, improving patient outcomes, and reducing unnecessary interventions, positioning it as a key element in personalised PCa management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haidar Al Saffar
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - David C Chen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Carlos Delgado
- School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
| | - Jacob Ingvar
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Nathan Lawrentschuk
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery (Urology), Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- EJ Whitten Prostate Cancer Research Centre, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Marlon Perera
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| | - Declan G Murphy
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Renu Eapen
- Division of Cancer Surgery, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Prostate Cancer Theranostics and Imaging Centre of Excellence, Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC 3052, Australia
- Department of Surgery, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Costa LB, Moreira R, Gaspar PR, de Galiza Barbosa F. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/Computed Tomography: Pearls and Pitfalls. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:161-175. [PMID: 37973240 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2023.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET (PSMA-PET) has emerged as a powerful imaging tool for prostate cancer primary staging, biochemical recurrence, and advanced disease assessment. This article offers a concise overview of the benefits and challenges associated with PSMA-PET for prostate cancer evaluation. The article highlights the advantages of PSMA-PET over conventional imaging, such as its higher sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastases, and the potential for guiding personalized treatment decisions. However, it also explores the limitations and potential pitfalls for interpretation. Overall, the article aims to provide valuable insights for clinicians and diagnostic imaging physicians in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Bastos Costa
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Sirio Libanes, Rua Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, Brazil; Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Americas Group, Rua Tupi 535, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - Renata Moreira
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Casa de Saúde São José, R. Macedo Sobrinho, 21 - Humaitá, Rio de Janeiro 22271-080, Brazil
| | - Priscilla Romano Gaspar
- Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Vitória (Americas Group) and Hospital de Força Aérea do Galeão, Avenida Jorge Curry 550, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Felipe de Galiza Barbosa
- Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Hospital Sirio Libanes, Rua Adma Jafet 91, São Paulo, Brazil; Radiology and Nuclear Medicine Department, Americas Group, Rua Tupi 535, São Paulo, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Voter AF, Werner RA, Savas H, Gafita A, Ross AE, Gorin MA, Solnes LB, Pomper MG, Rowe SP, Sheikhbahaei S. A Practical Guide to the Pearls and Pitfalls of PSMA PET Imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:119-131. [PMID: 37980186 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted PET agents have revolutionized the care of patients with prostate cancer, supplanting traditional methods of imaging prostate cancer, and improving the selection and delivery of therapies. This has led to a rapid expansion in both the number of PSMA PET scans performed and the imaging specialists required to interpret those scans. To aid those imagers and clinicians who are new to the interpretation of PSMA PET, this review provides an overview of the interpretation of PSMA PET/CT imaging and pearls for overcoming commonly encountered pitfalls. We discuss the physiologic distribution of the clinically available PSMA-targeted radiotracers, the commonly encountered patterns of prostate cancer spread, as well as the benign and malignant mimics of prostate cancer. Additionally, we review the standardized PSMA PET reporting systems and the role of PSMA in selecting appropriate patients for PSMA-targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew F Voter
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rudolf A Werner
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Hatice Savas
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Andrei Gafita
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ashley E Ross
- Department of Urology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Michael A Gorin
- Milton and Carroll Petrie Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Lilja B Solnes
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Martin G Pomper
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Department of Radiology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Sara Sheikhbahaei
- The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mohseninia N, Zamani-Siahkali N, Harsini S, Divband G, Pirich C, Beheshti M. Bone Metastasis in Prostate Cancer: Bone Scan Versus PET Imaging. Semin Nucl Med 2024; 54:97-118. [PMID: 37596138 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2023.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the second most common cause of malignancy among men, with bone metastasis being a significant source of morbidity and mortality in advanced cases. Detecting and treating bone metastasis at an early stage is crucial to improve the quality of life and survival of prostate cancer patients. This objective strongly relies on imaging studies. While CT and MRI have their specific utilities, they also possess certain drawbacks. Bone scintigraphy, although cost-effective and widely available, presents high false-positive rates. The emergence of PET/CT and PET/MRI, with their ability to overcome the limitations of standard imaging methods, offers promising alternatives for the detection of bone metastasis. Various radiotracers targeting cell division activity or cancer-specific membrane proteins, as well as bone seeking agents, have been developed and tested. The use of positron-emitting isotopes such as fluorine-18 and gallium-68 for labeling allows for a reduced radiation dose and unaffected biological properties. Furthermore, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics techniques in medical imaging has shown significant advancements in reducing interobserver variability, improving accuracy, and saving time. This article provides an overview of the advantages and limitations of bone scan using SPECT and SPECT/CT and PET imaging methods with different radiopharmaceuticals and highlights recent developments in hybrid scanners, AI, and radiomics for the identification of prostate cancer bone metastasis using molecular imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nasibeh Mohseninia
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Nazanin Zamani-Siahkali
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Department of Nuclear Medicine, Research center for Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Sara Harsini
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | | | - Christian Pirich
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vanden Berg RNW, Zilli T, Achard V, Dorff T, Abern M. The diagnosis and treatment of castrate-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer: A review. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2023; 26:702-711. [PMID: 37422523 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00688-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oligometastatic prostate cancer (OMPCa) is emerging as a transitional disease state between localized and polymetastatic disease. This review will assess the current knowledge of castrate-sensitive OMPCa. METHODS A review of the current literature was performed to summarize the definition and classification of OMPCa, assess the diagnostic methods and imaging modalities utilized, and to review the treatment options and outcomes. We further identify gaps in knowledge and areas for future research. RESULTS Currently there is no unified definition of OMPCa. National guidelines mostly recommend systemic therapies without distinguishing oligometastatic and polymetastatic disease. Next generation imaging is more sensitive than conventional imaging and has led to early detection of metastases at initial diagnosis or recurrence. While mostly retrospective in nature, recent studies suggest that treatment (surgical or radiation) of the primary tumor and/or metastatic sites might delay initiation of androgen deprivation therapy while increasing survival in selected patients. CONCLUSIONS Prospective data are required to better assess the incremental improvement in survival and quality of life achieved with various treatment strategies in patients with OMPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas Zilli
- Radiation Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland (IOSI), EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, Università della Svizzera Italiana, Lugano, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Vérane Achard
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HFR Fribourg, Villars-sur-Glâne, Switzerland
| | - Tanya Dorff
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Michael Abern
- Department of Urology, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA.
- Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Han T, Quan Z, Wang M, Meng X, Zhang M, Ye J, Li G, Wang J, Kang F. Head-to-Head Comparison of 68Ga-PSMA-11 with 68Ga-P137 in Patients with Suspected Prostate Cancer. Mol Pharm 2023; 20:5646-5654. [PMID: 37862042 DOI: 10.1021/acs.molpharmaceut.3c00522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2023]
Abstract
P137 is a novel oxalyldiaminopropionic acid-urea-based prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeting agent. This study compared the uptake patterns of 68Ga-P137 and the FDA-approved PET tracer 68Ga-PSMA-11 for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa). Sixteen patients suspected of PCa were scanned by 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 68Ga-P137 PET/CT, respectively, followed by prospective analysis. The tumor-to-background ratio was calculated using normal prostate tissue, blood pool, muscle, and urine as backgrounds. Pathology or follow-up results were used to analyze uptake patterns of benign/malignant lesions and various organs. Thirteen patients were diagnosed with PCa and three with benign prostate diseases (BPD). The number and location of primary lesions, lymph node metastasis (LNM) (n = 25), bone metastasis (n = 30), and liver metastasis (n = 3) detected by the two tracers were identical. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tumor/normal prostate ratio, as well as semiquantitative miPSMA-ES and PRIMARY diagnostic scores (P all >0.05) showed similar uptake levels of primary lesions between 68Ga-P137 and 68Ga-PSMA-11. Compared to 68Ga-P137, the SUVmax of 68Ga-PSMA-11 was significantly higher for bone metastasis, LNM, and liver metastasis (14.9 ± 7.2 vs 9.1 ± 4.4, 14.4 ± 5.0 vs 7.5 ± 2.4, 13.9 ± 2.0 vs 8.8 ± 2.4, P all <0.05). One-hour postinjection, SUVmax of the duodenum (9.4 ± 2.1 vs 16.2 ± 6.1), kidney (19.4 ± 4.3 vs 45.6 ± 20.9), and urine (14.1 ± 7.1 vs 42.1 ± 25.9) were significantly lower for 68Ga-P137 than for 68Ga-PSMA-11 (P all <0.05), whereas the radioactivity accumulation of blood pool and muscle (3.9 ± 0.5 vs 1.6 ± 0.4, 1.0 ± 0.1 vs 0.6 ± 0.1, P all <0.05) of 68Ga-P137 was significantly higher than 68Ga-PSMA-11. The uptake level of 68Ga-P137 has no significant difference from that of 68Ga-PSMA-11 in prostate primary lesions, and their imaging performances are visually equivalent for both primary and metastatic lesions, despite a higher blood pool and muscle background and a lower uptake in metastatic lesions. Due to the lower urine excretion of 68Ga-P137, primary prostate lesions near the urine can potentially be displayed clearer than 68Ga-PSMA-11.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tingting Han
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Zhiyong Quan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Min Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Xiaoli Meng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Mingru Zhang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Jiajun Ye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Guiyu Li
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| | - Fei Kang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Xijing Hospital, Fourth Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi 710032, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koehler D, Berliner C, Shenas F, Karimzadeh A, Apostolova I, Klutmann S, Adam G, Sauer M. PSMA hybrid imaging in prostate cancer - current applications and perspectives. ROFO-FORTSCHR RONTG 2023; 195:1001-1008. [PMID: 37348528 DOI: 10.1055/a-2088-9543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most common malignancy in men and the second most common tumor-associated cause of death in the male population in Germany. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted hybrid imaging using positron emission tomography (PET) in combination with CT or MRI represents a comparably new method that gained increasing importance in the diagnostic process of PCa in recent years. METHOD Current applications of PSMA hybrid imaging were summarized according to the German and European guidelines on PCa. New developments were elaborated based on a literature review of PubMed conducted in 10/22. RESULTS PSMA-PET/CT demonstrated higher detection rates for metastases in high-risk PCa and recurrent PCa after primary therapy than established imaging methods (CT, MRI, and bone scan). Despite promising results from prospective trials in both scenarios and substantial influence on clinical decision making, data regarding the influence of PSMA-PET on PCa-specific and overall survival are still lacking. Hence, PSMA PET/CT is recommended with a "weak" strength rating in most situations. However, its importance in new treatment options like metastasis-directed therapy or PSMA-radioligand therapy expands the scope of PSMA-PET in the clinical routine. CONCLUSION PSMA-targeting hybrid imaging represents the most sensitive diagnostic test in several stages of PCa and allows the development of new treatment strategies. Prospective studies are needed to evaluate the influence of PSMA-PET on patient survival. KEY POINTS · PSMA-PET/CT is superior to conventional imaging in the primary staging of high-risk prostate cancer.. · PSMA hybrid imaging can detect metastases in patients with biochemical recurrence at low PSA values.. · Clinical decision making is frequently influenced by results of PSMA-PET/CT.. CITATION FORMAT · Koehler D, Berliner C, Shenas F et al. PSMA hybrid imaging in prostate cancer - current applications and perspectives. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 1001 - 1008.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Koehler
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Farzad Shenas
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Amir Karimzadeh
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Ivayla Apostolova
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Susanne Klutmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gerhard Adam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Markus Sauer
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Inderjeeth A, Iravani A, Subramaniam S, Conduit C, Sandhu S. Novel radionuclide therapy combinations in prostate cancer. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2023; 15:17588359231187202. [PMID: 37547444 PMCID: PMC10399256 DOI: 10.1177/17588359231187202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer remains the commonest cancer diagnosed in males and a leading cause of cancer-related death. Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed on chemotherapy and androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (ARPI) have limited treatment options, significant morbidity, and poor outcomes. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-directed radionuclide therapy (RNT) is emerging as an efficacious and well-tolerated therapy; however, disease progression is universal. Several ongoing RNT trials focus on combination strategies to improve efficacy and durability of treatment response, including combinations with ARPIs, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapies. Further, efforts are underway to expand the role of PSMA-directed RNT to earlier stages of disease including hormone-sensitive and localized prostate cancer. In this review, we discuss the rationale and ongoing RNT combination therapeutic trials in prostate cancer and summarize the efficacy and toxicity associated with RNT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrisha–Jade Inderjeeth
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Amir Iravani
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Shalini Subramaniam
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Bankstown-Lidcombe Hospital, Bankstown, NSW, Australia
| | - Ciara Conduit
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Cancer Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Simon H, Henkel D, Chiron P, Helissey C. New perspectives on metabolic imaging in the management of prostate cancer in 2022: A focus on radiolabeled PSMA‑PET/CT (Review). Mol Clin Oncol 2023; 19:51. [PMID: 37323248 PMCID: PMC10265585 DOI: 10.3892/mco.2023.2647] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Nuclear medicine is an essential part of prostate cancer management concerning initial staging, patient follow-up and even therapy. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a glutamate carboxypeptidase II transmembrane glycoprotein expressed by 80% of prostatic cells. The interest in this protein is due to its specificity for prostatic tissue. The use of 68GaPSMA PET/CT in the context of disease staging is thus well-established and recommended, especially for high-risk disease with metastases and lymph node involvement. However, the risk of false positives raises questions regarding its place in the management of patients with prostate cancer. The present study aimed to determine the use of PET-PSMA in the care of patients with prostate cancer but also to assess its limits of use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hélène Simon
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Daniel Henkel
- Unité de Formation et de Recherche 5, University of Paris 8 Vincennes-St. Denis, 93200 Paris, France
| | - Paul Chiron
- Department of Urology, Military Hospital Begin, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France
| | - Carole Helissey
- Clinical Research Unit, Department of Oncology, Military Hospital Begin, 94160 Saint-Mandé, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
McLaughlin LA, Yildirim O, Rosenblum MK, Imber BS, Haseltine JM, Zelefsky MJ, Schöder H, Morris MJ, Rafelson WM, Krebs S, Moss NS. Identification of incidental brain tumors in prostate cancer patients via PSMA PET/CT. J Neurooncol 2023; 163:455-462. [PMID: 37247180 PMCID: PMC10746351 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-023-04355-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Brain metastases are rare in patients with prostate cancer and portend poor outcome. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET)/CT scans including the brain have identified incidental tumors. We sought to identify the incidental brain tumor detection rate of PSMA PET/CT performed at initial diagnosis or in the setting of biochemical recurrence. METHODS An institutional database was queried for patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 or 18F-DCFPyL (18F-piflufolastat) PET/CT imaging at an NCI-designated Comprehensive Cancer Center from 1/2018 to 12/2022. Imaging reports and clinical courses were reviewed to identify brain lesions and describe clinical and pathologic features. RESULTS Two-thousand seven hundred and sixty-three patients underwent 3363 PSMA PET/CT scans in the absence of neurologic symptoms. Forty-four brain lesions were identified, including 33 PSMA-avid lesions: 10 intraparenchymal metastases (30%), 4 dural-based metastases (12%), 16 meningiomas (48%), 2 pituitary macroadenomas (6%), and 1 epidermal inclusion cyst (3%) (incidences of 0.36, 0.14, 0.58, 0.07, and 0.04%). The mean parenchymal metastasis diameter and mean SUVmax were 1.99 cm (95%CI:1.25-2.73) and 4.49 (95%CI:2.41-6.57), respectively. At the time of parenchymal brain metastasis detection, 57% of patients had no concurrent extracranial disease, 14% had localized prostate disease only, and 29% had extracranial metastases. Seven of 8 patients with parenchymal brain metastases remain alive at a median 8.8 months follow-up. CONCLUSION Prostate cancer brain metastases are rare, especially in the absence of widespread metastatic disease. Nevertheless, incidentally detected brain foci of PSMA uptake may represent previously unknown prostate cancer metastases, even in small lesions and in the absence of systemic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lily A McLaughlin
- Georgetown University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Onur Yildirim
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Marc K Rosenblum
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Brandon S Imber
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
- Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Justin M Haseltine
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Zelefsky
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Michael J Morris
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - William M Rafelson
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simone Krebs
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nelson S Moss
- Department of Neurosurgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Multidisciplinary Brain Metastasis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
- Department of Neurosurgery and Brain Metastasis Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Striese F, Neuber C, Gräßel S, Arndt C, Ullrich M, Steinbach J, Pietzsch J, Bergmann R, Pietzsch HJ, Sihver W, Frenz M, Feldmann A, Bachmann MP. Preclinical Characterization of the 177Lu-Labeled Prostate Stem Cell Antigen (PSCA)-Specific Monoclonal Antibody 7F5. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24119420. [PMID: 37298374 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24119420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Revised: 05/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an excellent target for imaging and treatment of prostate carcinoma (PCa). Unfortunately, not all PCa cells express PSMA. Therefore, alternative theranostic targets are required. The membrane protein prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) is highly overexpressed in most primary prostate carcinoma (PCa) cells and in metastatic and hormone refractory tumor cells. Moreover, PSCA expression positively correlates with tumor progression. Therefore, it represents a potential alternative theranostic target suitable for imaging and/or radioimmunotherapy. In order to support this working hypothesis, we conjugated our previously described anti-PSCA monoclonal antibody (mAb) 7F5 with the bifunctional chelator CHX-A″-DTPA and subsequently radiolabeled it with the theranostic radionuclide 177Lu. The resulting radiolabeled mAb ([177Lu]Lu-CHX-A″-DTPA-7F5) was characterized both in vitro and in vivo. It showed a high radiochemical purity (>95%) and stability. The labelling did not affect its binding capability. Biodistribution studies showed a high specific tumor uptake compared to most non-targeted tissues in mice bearing PSCA-positive tumors. Accordingly, SPECT/CT images revealed a high tumor-to-background ratios from 16 h to 7 days after administration of [177Lu]Lu-CHX-A″-DTPA-7F5. Consequently, [177Lu]Lu-CHX-A″-DTPA-7F5 represents a promising candidate for imaging and in the future also for radioimmunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Franziska Striese
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Christin Neuber
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Sandy Gräßel
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Claudia Arndt
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Ullrich
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Steinbach
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Jens Pietzsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, 01062 Dresden, Germany
| | - Ralf Bergmann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- Institute of Biophysics and Radiation Biology, Semmelweis University, 1094 Budapest, Hungary
| | - Hans-Jürgen Pietzsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Wiebke Sihver
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Marcus Frenz
- Faculty of Informatik and Wirtschaftsinformatik, Provadis School of International Management and Technology AG, 65926 Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Anja Feldmann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael P Bachmann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (UCC/NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Margail C, Merlin C, Billoux T, Wallaert M, Otman H, Sas N, Molnar I, Guillemin F, Boyer L, Guy L, Tempier M, Levesque S, Revy A, Cachin F, Chanchou M. Imaging quality of an artificial intelligence denoising algorithm: validation in 68Ga PSMA-11 PET for patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res 2023; 13:50. [PMID: 37231229 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-023-00999-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND 68 Ga-PSMA PET is the leading prostate cancer imaging technique, but the image quality remains noisy and could be further improved using an artificial intelligence-based denoising algorithm. To address this issue, we analyzed the overall quality of reprocessed images compared to standard reconstructions. We also analyzed the diagnostic performances of the different sequences and the impact of the algorithm on lesion intensity and background measures. METHODS We retrospectively included 30 patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer who had undergone 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET-CT. We simulated images produced using only a quarter, half, three-quarters, or all of the acquired data material reprocessed using the SubtlePET® denoising algorithm. Three physicians with different levels of experience blindly analyzed every sequence and then used a 5-level Likert scale to assess the series. The binary criterion of lesion detectability was compared between series. We also compared lesion SUV, background uptake, and diagnostic performances of the series (sensitivity, specificity, accuracy). RESULTS VPFX-derived series were classified differently but better than standard reconstructions (p < 0.001) using half the data. Q.Clear series were not classified differently using half the signal. Some series were noisy but had no significant effect on lesion detectability (p > 0.05). The SubtlePET® algorithm significantly decreased lesion SUV (p < 0.005) and increased liver background (p < 0.005) and had no substantial effect on the diagnostic performance of each reader. CONCLUSION We show that the SubtlePET® can be used for 68 Ga-PSMA scans using half the signal with similar image quality to Q.Clear series and superior quality to VPFX series. However, it significantly modifies quantitative measurements and should not be used for comparative examinations if standard algorithm is applied during follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Margail
- Nuclear Medicine, CLCC Jean Perrin: Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
| | - Charles Merlin
- Nuclear Medicine, CLCC Jean Perrin: Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Tommy Billoux
- Inserm UMR 1240 IMOST, Physique Médicale, CLCC Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Hosameldin Otman
- Nuclear Medicine, CLCC Jean Perrin: Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Nicolas Sas
- Inserm UMR 1240 IMOST, Physique Médicale, CLCC Jean Perrin, Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Ioana Molnar
- Biostatistics, CLCC Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Inserm UMR1240 IMoST, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | | | - Louis Boyer
- Radiology, UMR 6602 UCA/CNRS/SIGMA, Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied TGI -Institut Pascal, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Laurent Guy
- Urology, Hôpital Gabriel-Montpied, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marion Tempier
- Nuclear Medicine, CLCC Jean Perrin: Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Inserm UMR1240 IMoST, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Sophie Levesque
- Nuclear Medicine, CLCC Jean Perrin: Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Inserm UMR1240 IMoST, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Alban Revy
- Nuclear Medicine, CLCC Jean Perrin: Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Florent Cachin
- Nuclear Medicine, CLCC Jean Perrin: Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Inserm UMR1240 IMoST, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| | - Marion Chanchou
- Nuclear Medicine, CLCC Jean Perrin: Centre Jean Perrin, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Inserm UMR1240 IMoST, Clermont-Ferrand, France
- Université Clermont Auvergne, Clermont-Ferrand, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mei R, Kessler L, Pabst KM, Weber M, Schimdkonz C, Rischpler C, Zacho HD, Hope T, Schwarzenböck SM, Allen-Auerbach M, Emmett L, Ferdinandus J, Unterrainer M, Schaarschmidt BM, Umutlu L, Farolfi A, Castellucci P, Nanni C, Telo S, Fanti S, Herrmann K, Fendler WP. 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT Interobserver Agreement on Tumor Assessment: An International Multicenter Prospective Study. J Nucl Med 2023:jnumed.122.265245. [PMID: 37230530 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2022] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
68Ga-fibroblast activation protein inhibitors (FAPIs) are promising radiotracers for cancer imaging, with emerging data in the recent years. Nonetheless, the interobserver agreement on 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT study interpretations in cancer patients remains poorly understood. Methods: 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT was performed on 50 patients with various tumor entities (sarcoma [n = 10], colorectal cancer [n = 10], pancreatic adenocarcinoma [n = 10], genitourinary cancer [n = 10], and other types of cancer [n = 10]). Fifteen masked observers reviewed and interpreted the images using a standardized approach for local, local nodal, and metastatic involvement. Observers were grouped by experience as having a low (<30 prior 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT studies; n = 5), intermediate (30-300 studies; n = 5), or high level of experience (>300 studies; n = 5). Two independent readers with a high level of experience and unmasked to clinical information, histopathology, tumor markers, and follow-up imaging (CT/MRI or PET/CT) served as the standard of reference (SOR). Observer groups were compared by overall agreement (percentage of patients matching SOR) and Fleiss κ with mean and corresponding 95% CI. We defined acceptable agreement as a κ value of at least 0.6 (substantial or higher) and acceptable accuracy as at least 80%. Results: Highly experienced observers agreed substantially on all categories (primary tumor: κ = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.71-0.71; local nodal involvement: κ = 0.62; 95% CI, 0.61-0.62; distant metastasis: κ = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.75-0.75), whereas observers with intermediate experience showed substantial agreement on primary tumor (κ = 0.73; 95% CI, 0.73-0.73) and distant metastasis (κ = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.65-0.65) but moderate agreement on local nodal stages (κ = 0.55; 95% CI, 0.55-0.55). Observers with low experience had moderate agreement on all categories (primary tumor: κ = 0.57; 95% CI, 0.57-0.58; local nodal involvement: κ = 0.51; 95% CI, 0.51-0.52; distant metastasis: κ = 0.54; 95% CI, 0.53-0.54). Compared with SOR, the accuracy for readers with high, intermediate, and low experience was 85%, 83%, and 78%, respectively. In summary, only highly experienced readers showed substantial agreement and a diagnostic accuracy of at least 80% in all categories. Conclusion: The interpretation of 68Ga-FAPI PET/CT for cancer imaging had substantial reproducibility and accuracy among highly experienced observers only, especially for local nodal and metastatic assessments. Therefore, for accurate interpretation of different tumor entities and pitfalls, we recommend training or experience with at least 300 representative scans for future clinical readers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Mei
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany;
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lukas Kessler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Kim M Pabst
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Christoph Rischpler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | | | - Martin Allen-Auerbach
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
- Institute of Urologic Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
| | - Louise Emmett
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, and Faculty of Medicine, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Justin Ferdinandus
- Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital LMU Munich, Munich, Germany; and
| | - Benedikt M Schaarschmidt
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Andrea Farolfi
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Paolo Castellucci
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Cristina Nanni
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Silvi Telo
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine Department, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium, Partner Site University Hospital Essen, and German Cancer Research Center, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nishimura K. Management of bone metastasis in prostate cancer. J Bone Miner Metab 2023; 41:317-326. [PMID: 37162606 DOI: 10.1007/s00774-023-01435-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/11/2023]
Abstract
Progression of bone metastases is the primary cause of death in prostate cancer, and skeletal-related events (SREs), including pathologic fractures, spinal cord compression, radiation, or surgery to bone can impair patients' quality of life. Over the past decade, the development of cytotoxic agents, androgen-receptor-axis-targeted therapies (ARATs), and radioligand therapies has prolonged overall survival of prostate cancer patients with bone metastases and reduced the risk of SREs. The use of bone-modifying agents has also contributed to the reduced risk of SREs. Initial use of a cytotoxic agent, docetaxel, or an ARAT agent with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) is the current approach to metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer. However, there is no consensus on the optimal medication for upfront use in combination with ADT, or on specific patient selection. Recently, next-generation imaging modalities, such as whole-body magnetic resonance imaging and prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography have been utilized to detect bone metastases at an early stage. In addition, metastasis-directed therapy, such as stereotactic body radiation therapy, has been attempted. In the future, patients with bone metastatic prostate cancer will be divided into subgroups and their treatment options will be tailored to their specific characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuo Nishimura
- Department of Urology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3-1-69 Otemae, Chuo-ku, Osaka, 541-8567, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Fendler WP, Eiber M, Beheshti M, Bomanji J, Calais J, Ceci F, Cho SY, Fanti S, Giesel FL, Goffin K, Haberkorn U, Jacene H, Koo PJ, Kopka K, Krause BJ, Lindenberg L, Marcus C, Mottaghy FM, Oprea-Lager DE, Osborne JR, Piert M, Rowe SP, Schöder H, Wan S, Wester HJ, Hope TA, Herrmann K. PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:1466-1486. [PMID: 36604326 PMCID: PMC10027805 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-06089-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 63.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Here we aim to provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. Procedures and characteristics are reported for a variety of available PSMA small radioligands. Different scenarios for the clinical use of PSMA-ligand PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence, to support the implementation of PSMA PET/CT imaging in research and routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
- PET Committee of the German Society of Nuclear Medicine, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging & Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Jeremie Calais
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Theranostics, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Steve Y Cho
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, USA
| | | | - Frederik L Giesel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine-University and Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Karolien Goffin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University Hospital Leuven, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Heather Jacene
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA
| | | | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- School of Science, Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, Technical University Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Liza Lindenberg
- Molecular Imaging Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Charles Marcus
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Radiology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Felix M Mottaghy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joseph R Osborne
- Department of Radiology, Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapeutics, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Morand Piert
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Hans-Jürgen Wester
- Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Walther-Meißner-Str. 3, 85748, Garching, Germany
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Afshar-Oromieh A, Eiber M, Fendler W, Schmidt M, Rahbar K, Ahmadzadehfar H, Umutlu L, Hadaschik B, Hakenberg OW, Fornara P, Kurth J, Neels O, Wester HJ, Schwaiger M, Kopka K, Haberkorn U, Herrmann K, Krause BJ. [Procedure Guideline for Prostate Cancer Imaging with PSMA-ligand PET/CT]. Nuklearmedizin 2023; 62:5-19. [PMID: 36746147 DOI: 10.1055/a-1984-8167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
PSMA-PET/CT for imaging prostate cancer (PC) has spread worldwide since its clinical introduction in 2011. The majority of experiences have been collected for PSMA-PET-imaging of recurrent PC. Data for primary staging of high-risk PC are highly promising. Meanwhile, a plethora of PSMA-ligands are available for clinical use (e. g. 68Ga-PSMA-11, 68Ga-PSMA-I&T, 68Ga-PSMA-617, 18F-DCFBC, 18F-DCFPyL, 18F-PSMA-1007, 18F-rhPSMA-7 and 18F-JK-PSMA-7). However, an official approval is available only for 68Ga-PSMA-11 (approved by the US FDA in 2020) and 18F-DCFPyL (approved by the US FDA in 2021).Recommendations for acquisition times vary from 1-2 h p. i. It has been shown that for the majority of tumour lesions, the contrast in PSMA-PET/CT increases with time. Therefore, additional late imaging can help to clarify unclear findings. PSMA-PET/CT should be performed prior to commencing an androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) since (long term) ADT reduces the visibility of PC lesions. Following injection of PSMA-ligands, hydration and forced diuresis are recommended for PSMA-ligands with primarily excretion via the kidneys in order to increase the visibility of tumour lesions adjacent to the urinary bladder.PSMA-ligands are physiologically taken up in multiple normal organs. For some 18F-labelled PSMA-ligands, presence of unspecific focal bone uptake has been reported. When using these tracers, focal bone uptake without CT-correlate should be interpreted with great caution. Besides prostate cancer, practically all solid tumors express PSMA in their neovasculature thereby taking up PSMA-ligands, although usually at a lower extent compared to PC. Also multiple benign lesions and inflammatory processes (e. g. lymph nodes) take up PSMA-ligands, also usually at lower extent compared to PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Universitätsklinikum Bern, Inselspital, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin, Universität Bern, Schweiz
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Technische Universität München, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin
| | | | - Matthias Schmidt
- Universitätsklinikum Köln, Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Universitätsklinikum Münster, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin
| | | | - Lale Umutlu
- Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Radiologie
| | - Boris Hadaschik
- Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Kinderurologie und Uroonkologie
| | | | - Paolo Fornara
- Universitätsklinikum Halle, Universitätsklinik und Poliklinik für Urologie
| | - Jens Kurth
- Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin
| | - O Neels
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Institut für Radiopharmazeutische Krebsforschung.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partnerstandort Dresden
| | | | | | - Klaus Kopka
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Institut für Radiopharmazeutische Krebsforschung.,Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK), Partnerstandort Dresden
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Abteilung Nuklearmedizin der Radiologischen Klinik
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Universitätsklinikum Essen, Klinik für Nuklearmedizin
| | - Bernd J Krause
- Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Klinik und Poliklinik für Nuklearmedizin
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sandach P, Seifert R, Slama A, Theegarten D, Hautzel H. Histological Validation of FDG and PSMA-Targeted PET/CT Imaging in a Rare Tracheal Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:e16-e18. [PMID: 36469074 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004441] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Adenoid cystic carcinomas are the second most common entity of tracheal malignancies, which have an overall incidence as low as only 0.2 in 100,000 persons per year. We present the case of a 64-year-old man with a histologically confirmed adenoid cystic carcinoma who sequentially underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT within 1 day for staging 3 days before surgical resection of the tumor. Immunohistochemistry revealed PSMA expression of the tumor corroborating the PSMA PET findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Sandach
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen
| | - Robert Seifert
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen
| | - Alexis Slama
- Department of Thoracic Surgery and Thoracic Bronchoscopy, Ruhrlandklinik
| | - Dirk Theegarten
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Hubertus Hautzel
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
PSMA-1007 Uptake in Ganglia of the Sympathetic Trunk and Its Intra-individual Reproducibility. Mol Imaging Biol 2022; 25:554-559. [PMID: 36369484 PMCID: PMC10172258 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-022-01784-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Aim/Purpose
18F-labeled PSMA ligands offer various advantages as PET tracers over 68Ga-labeled PSMA counterparts. Especially, an improved spatial resolution leads to improved detection rates of smaller prostate cancer (PCa) lesions. However, physiological PSMA uptake of ganglia of the sympathetic trunk can be quickly misinterpreted as possible PSMA-positive lymph node metastases. The aim of this retrospective study is to investigate [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake and its intra-individual reproducibility in ganglia of the sympathetic trunk.
Methods
We retrospectively included 28 consecutive patients (median age 69 ± 9 with a range of 49–90) with biochemical recurrence of PCa who underwent [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scan and, accordingly, a follow-up examination between August 2018 and August 2021. Cervical, coeliac, and sacral ganglia were identified on the iterative PET reconstructions and correlated with CT component. Tracer uptake of ganglia was determined by measuring SUVmax and SUVmean values. Anatomical position of the ganglia in relation to adjacent vertebral bodies were noted. Statistical analyses were conducted using two-way repeated measures ANOVA and descriptive statistics.
Results
The highest [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake was found in coeliac ganglia followed by cervical and sacral ganglia. The SUVmax in coeliac ganglia was 3.13 ± 0.85 (follow-up scan 3.11 ± 0.93), in cervical ganglia 2.73 ± 0.69 (follow-up scan 2.67 ± 0.74), and in sacral ganglia 1.67 ± 0.50 (follow-up scan 1.64 ± 0.52). The SUVmean in coeliac ganglia was 2.28 ± 0.64 (follow-up scan 2.28 ± 0.66), in cervical ganglia 1.62 ± 0.43 (follow-up scan 1.61 ± 0.43) and in sacral ganglia 1.15 ± 0.33 (follow-up scan 1.12 ± 0.34). In a given ganglion station, there was no statistically significant difference of SUVmax or SUVmean values between baseline and follow-up scans.
Conclusions
The first systematically described physiological [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake in ganglia of the sympathetic trunk showed a low variability of SUVmax or SUVmean and a good intra-individual reproducibility of [18F]PSMA-1007 uptake in follow-up scans. These findings might improve and guide the differentiation of ganglia from possible malignant lesions.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hu C, Dong L, Xue W, Pienta KJ. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Based PET Brings New Insights into the Management of Prostate Cancer. PET Clin 2022; 17:555-564. [PMID: 36153235 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2022.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/14/2022]
Abstract
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in the world. Since its first identification in 1987 and its first molecular cloning in 1993, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been developed as a theragnostic imaging biomarker and therapeutic agent for PCa. For metastatic castration-resistant PCa, PSMA-based PET imaging can be applied to the monitoring of disease and response assessment with PSMA-based therapeutics. This novel imaging modality is bringing new insights into diagnosis, stratification, and clinical decision-making and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cong Hu
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Liang Dong
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Wei Xue
- Department of Urology, Renji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 160 Pujian Road, Shanghai 200127, China
| | - Kenneth J Pienta
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Kisiel N, Thomas P. Potential Pitfall in the Interpretation of Ganglioneuronal Uptake of 18 F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Scans Performed With a High Spatial Resolution Digital PET Scanner. Clin Nucl Med 2022; 47:807-808. [PMID: 35695744 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT A 69-year-old man with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy 5 years previously and subsequent salvage radiotherapy to the prostate bed and pelvic nodes underwent PET/CT on a Siemens mCT Flow PET and a second PET/CT 10 months later on a Siemens Vision 600 Digital PET. In addition to a suspicious left hilar lymph node, the new high-resolution PET showed increased visualization and avidity of physiologic uptake in paraspinal and presacral sympathetic ganglia. Caution should be undertaken when interpreting PET/CTs performed on high-resolution digital scanners to avoid mistaking ganglia uptake for metastatic disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadya Kisiel
- From the Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Examination in Patients with Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153768. [PMID: 35954432 PMCID: PMC9367427 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The prostate specific membrane antigens, abbreviated as PSMAs, are type II membrane proteins that are highly ex-pressed on the surface of malignant prostate tissue in prostate cancer (PCa), particularly in aggressive, andro-gen-deprived, metastatic, and hormone-refractory PCa. Today, radionuclides that bind to these PSMA peptides are widely available for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes to specifically image and target prostate tumor cells at molec-ular level. In this descriptive review, we aimed to emphasize the usefulness of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) examination in the management of patients with various stages of PCa. In addition, we outlined the main pitfalls and limitations of this scan to avoid misinterpretation of the results and to improve the decision making process in rela-tion to the patient’s further treatment. We concluded that PSMA PET examination in primary PCa patients has an es-sential role in the high-risk group. It is the new imaging standard in patients with in biochemical recurrence PCa and plays an important role in treatment decision. Furthermore, PSMA PET scan is a gold standard for the evaluation of PSMA targeted therapies in patients having progress of the disease. Future prospective studies, particularly on the im-pact of PSMA PET on therapy stratification, may further strengthen the role of PSMA in the treatment of PCa patients. Abstract With the progressive aging of the population in industrially developed countries, as well as advances in diagnostic and biopsy techniques and improvements in patient awareness, the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is continuously increasing worldwide. Therefore, PCa is currently considered as the second leading cause of tumor-related death. Early detection of the tumor and its metastasis is essential, as the rate of disease recurrence is high and occurs in 27% to 53% of all patients who underwent curative therapy with radical prostatectomy or local radiotherapy. In this regard, the prostate specific membrane antigens, abbreviated as PSMAs, are type II membrane proteins that are highly expressed on the surface of malignant prostate tissue in PCa, particularly in aggressive, androgen-deprived, metastatic, and hormone-refractory PCa, and they are inversely associated with the androgen level. Up to 95% of adenocarcinomas of the prostate express PSMA receptors on their surface. Today, radionuclides that bind to these PSMA peptides are widely accepted for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes to specifically image and target prostate tumor cells at the molecular level, a process referred to as targeted theranostics. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the integration of these peptides into diagnostic and therapeutic procedures plays a critical role in the primary staging and treatment decisions of especially high-risk PCa, expands therapeutic options for patients with advanced stage of prostate tumor, and prolongs patients’ survival rate. In this review article, we intend to briefly spotlight the latest clinical utilization of the PSMA-targeted radioligand PET imaging modality in patients with different stages of PCa. Furthermore, limitations and pitfalls of this diagnostic technique are presented.
Collapse
|
23
|
Coskun N, Kartal MO, Erdogan AS, Ozdemir E. Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting the likelihood of metastasis in prostate cancer patients undergoing Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT due to biochemical recurrence. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:952-958. [PMID: 35661662 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop a nomogram based on commonly used clinical data for predicting the likelihood of metastasis in gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/computed tomography (Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT) scans of prostate cancer patients with confirmed biochemical recurrence (BCR). METHODS One-hundred thirty-five ( n = 135) patients who underwent Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT due to BCR were included in the study. Predictors of metastasis in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT were determined with multivariable logistic regression analysis. Coefficients derived from the regression model were used to develop a prediction nomogram. The performance of the prediction model was evaluated with receiver operating characteristic analysis. Internal validation was performed with 50 bootstrap resamples, and the nomogram's clinical benefit was assessed with decision curve analysis. RESULTS Multivariable logistic regression analysis revealed that ISUP group, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) before PET and PSA doubling time were independent predictors of metastasis in Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT. A prediction nomogram was developed according to this model [the area under curve: 0.866; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.788-0.944]. The best cutoff value of the nomogram-derived likelihood for predicting metastasis was 60%, with a bootstrap-corrected accuracy of 78.8%. An online version of the nomogram was implemented on pro-gram.nzm.co ( https://pro-gram.nzm.co ). CONCLUSION The proposed nomogram provides a practical approach for predicting the likelihood of imaging-based metastasis according to Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT in patients with BCR, with results ≥60% being the most accurate cutoff for referring patients to Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT. If validated in a larger cohort, this tool can serve as a guide for the appropriate use of Ga-68 PSMA PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazim Coskun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital
- Department of Medical Informatics, Middle East Technical University
| | - M Oguz Kartal
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital
| | | | - Elif Ozdemir
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
The Role of PSMA PET/CT in the Primary Diagnosis and Follow-Up of Prostate Cancer-A Practical Clinical Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14153638. [PMID: 35892897 PMCID: PMC9367536 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14153638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 07/21/2022] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary The combination of positron emission tomography (PET)-diagnostics with ligands binding to the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been a diagnostic milestone in the situation of biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer and is gaining importance in primary diagnostics, providing a highly specific and sensitive diagnostic method in various clinical situations. However, the clinical application of this method requires a comprehensive knowledge of its advantages and disadvantages, potential pitfalls and influencing factors. This review aims to provide a practical clinical review of the currently available background data on PSMA PET/CT, as well as the clinical implications. Although a large amount of data already exist, a thorough analysis is complicated by study heterogeneity, showing the need for future systematic and prospective research. Abstract The importance of PSMA PET/CT in both primary diagnostics and prostate cancer recurrence has grown steadily since its introduction more than a decade ago. Over the past years, a vast amount of data have been published on the diagnostic accuracy and the impact of PSMA PET/CT on patient management. Nevertheless, a large heterogeneity between studies has made reaching a consensus difficult; this review aims to provide a comprehensive clinical review of the available scientific literature, covering the currently known data on physiological and pathological PSMA expression, influencing factors, the differences and pitfalls of various tracers, as well as the clinical implications in initial TNM-staging and in the situation of biochemical recurrence. This review has the objective of providing a practical clinical overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the examination in various clinical situations and the body of knowledge available, as well as open questions still requiring further research.
Collapse
|
25
|
Wang Y, Galante JR, Haroon A, Wan S, Afaq A, Payne H, Bomanji J, Adeleke S, Kasivisvanathan V. The future of PSMA PET and WB MRI as next-generation imaging tools in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Urol 2022; 19:475-493. [PMID: 35789204 DOI: 10.1038/s41585-022-00618-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Radiolabelled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based PET-CT has been shown in numerous studies to be superior to conventional imaging in the detection of nodal or distant metastatic lesions. 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT is now recommended by many guidelines for the detection of biochemically relapsed disease after radical local therapy. PSMA radioligands can also function as radiotheranostics, and Lu-PSMA has been shown to be a potential new line of treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Whole-body (WB) MRI has been shown to have a high diagnostic performance in the detection and monitoring of metastatic bone disease. Prospective, randomized, multicentre studies comparing 68Ga-PSMA PET-CT and WB MRI for pelvic nodal and metastatic disease detection are yet to be performed. Challenges for interpretation of PSMA include tracer trapping in non-target tissues and also urinary excretion of tracers, which confounds image interpretation at the vesicoureteral junction. Additionally, studies have shown how long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) affects PSMA expression and could, therefore, reduce tracer uptake and visibility of PSMA+ lesions. Furthermore, ADT of short duration might increase PSMA expression, leading to the PSMA flare phenomenon, which makes the accurate monitoring of treatment response to ADT with PSMA PET challenging. Scan duration, detection of incidentalomas and presence of metallic implants are some of the major challenges with WB MRI. Emerging data support the wider adoption of PSMA PET and WB MRI for diagnosis, staging, disease burden evaluation and response monitoring, although their relative roles in the standard-of-care management of patients are yet to be fully defined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yishen Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust, Romford, UK.
| | - Joao R Galante
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Athar Haroon
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Simon Wan
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Asim Afaq
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Radiology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Heather Payne
- Department of Oncology, University College London Hospitals, London, UK
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sola Adeleke
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.,School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK.,Department of Urology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kaewput C, Vinjamuri S. Update of PSMA Theranostics in Prostate Cancer: Current Applications and Future Trends. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11102738. [PMID: 35628867 PMCID: PMC9144463 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11102738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2022] [Revised: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
There is now an increasing trend for targeting cancers to go beyond early diagnosis and actually improve Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival. Identifying patients who might benefit from a particular targeted treatment is the main focus for Precision Medicine. Radiolabeled ligands can be used as predictive biomarkers which can confirm target expression by cancers using positron emission tomography (PET). The same ligand can subsequently be labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide for targeted radionuclide therapy. This combined approach is termed “Theranostics”. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has emerged as an attractive diagnostic and therapeutic target for small molecule ligands in prostate cancer. It can be labeled with either positron emitters for PET-based imaging or beta and alpha emitters for targeted radionuclide therapy. This review article summarizes the important concepts for Precision Medicine contributing to improved diagnosis and targeted therapy of patients with prostate cancer and we identify some key learning points and areas for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chalermrat Kaewput
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
- Correspondence:
| | - Sobhan Vinjamuri
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool L7 8XP, UK;
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Simon NI, Parker C, Hope TA, Paller CJ. Best Approaches and Updates for Prostate Cancer Biochemical Recurrence. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book 2022; 42:1-8. [PMID: 35503984 PMCID: PMC9844546 DOI: 10.1200/edbk_351033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Biochemical recurrence develops in almost one-third of men with prostate cancer after treatment with local therapy. There are numerous options for management, including surveillance, salvage radiation, androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), and clinical trials. This article reviews the current approaches to radiation therapy, ADT, and molecular imaging in men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. First, radiation therapy, including selection of field, dose, and use of concurrent antiandrogen therapy, is reviewed. Next, molecular imaging is addressed, including prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging and its increased sensitivity in identifying sites of disease. Finally, the factors associated with starting ADT are explored, and the data supporting intermittent over continuous ADT are reviewed. Lastly, the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET imaging and its potential role influencing therapy are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas I Simon
- National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Chris Parker
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
| | - Channing J Paller
- Department of Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Heidegger I, Kesch C, Kretschmer A, Tsaur I, Ceci F, Valerio M, Tilki D, Marra G, Preisser F, Fankhauser CD, Zattoni F, Chiu P, Puche-Sanz I, Olivier J, van den Bergh RCN, Kasivisvanathan V, Pircher A, Virgolini I, Gandaglia G. Biomarkers to personalize treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - a state of the art review. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2022; 14:17588359221081922. [PMID: 35273651 PMCID: PMC8902011 DOI: 10.1177/17588359221081922] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioligand therapy with Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has shown to prolong survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). One of the major challenges for clinicians in the future is to select those patients who would benefit most from this therapy to position it in the treatment landscape of mCRPC. This, in turn, will lead to the delivery of personalized therapies. In this narrative review article we summarize recent studies investigating both predictive and prognostic clinical, imaging-based, and molecular biomarkers to predict treatment response to 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy with the aim of identifying men who should be considered for this approach. Of note, the evidence on the role of biomarkers currently relies on small retrospective trials and their validation in larger prospective cohorts is necessary before these results can be translated in the clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Heidegger
- Professor of Urology, Department of Urology, Medical University Innsbruck, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Claudia Kesch
- Department of Urology, Essen University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Igor Tsaur
- Department of Urology and Pediatric Urology, Mainz University Medicine, Mainz, Germany
| | - Francesco Ceci
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Valerio
- Department of Urology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Derya Tilki
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Urology, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, University of Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Felix Preisser
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Fabio Zattoni
- Urology Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Integrata di Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Peter Chiu
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Ignacio Puche-Sanz
- Department of Urology, Bio-Health Research Institute, Hospital Universitario Virgende las Nieves, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
| | | | | | - Veeru Kasivisvanathan
- Division of Surgery and Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andreas Pircher
- Hematology and Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine V, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Irene Virgolini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Giorgio Gandaglia
- Division of Oncology and Unit of Urology, Urological Research Institute, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ong JS, Hofman MS. PET imaging of prostate cancer. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-822960-6.00111-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
|
30
|
Abstract
More than 40% of men with intermediate-risk or high-risk prostate cancer will experience a biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Clinical guidelines for the management of these patients largely focus on the use of salvage radiotherapy with or without systemic therapy. However, not all patients with biochemical recurrence will go on to develop metastases or die from their disease. The optimal pre-salvage therapy investigational workup for patients who experience biochemical recurrence should, therefore, include novel techniques such as PET imaging and genomic analysis of radical prostatectomy specimen tissue, as well as consideration of more traditional clinical variables such as PSA value, PSA kinetics, Gleason score and pathological stage of disease. In patients without metastatic disease, the only known curative intervention is salvage radiotherapy but, given the therapeutic burden of this treatment, importance must be placed on accurate timing of treatment, radiation dose, fractionation and field size. Systemic therapy also has a role in the salvage setting, both concurrently with radiotherapy and as salvage monotherapy.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hoberück S, Löck S, Borkowetz A, Sommer U, Winzer R, Zöphel K, Fedders D, Michler E, Kotzerke J, Kopka K, Hölscher T, Braune A. Intraindividual comparison of [ 68 Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 and [ 18F]-F-PSMA-1007 in prostate cancer patients: a retrospective single-center analysis. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:109. [PMID: 34665337 PMCID: PMC8526666 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00845-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The analysis aimed to compare the radiotracers [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 and [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 intraindividually in terms of malignant lesions, mi(molecular-imaging)TNM staging and presumable unspecific lesions retrospectively as used in routine clinical practice. METHODS A retrospective analysis of 46 prostate cancer patients (median age: 71 years) who underwent consecutive [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11- and [18F]-F-PSMA-1007-PET/CT or PET/MRI within a mean of 12 ± 8.0 days was performed. MiTNM staging was performed in both studies by two nuclear medicine physicians who were blinded to the results of the other tracer. After intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary consensus with two radiologists was reached, differences in both malignant and presumable nonspecific tracer accumulation were analyzed. RESULTS Differences in terms of miTNM stages in both studies occurred in nine of the 46 patients (19.6%). The miT stages differed in five patients (10.9%), the miN stages differed in three patients (6.5%), and different miM stages occurred only in one patient who was upstaged in [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 PET. Concordant miTNM stages were obtained in 37 patients (80.4%). There was no significant difference between [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11 in the SUVmax locally (31.5 vs. 32.7; p = 0.658), in lymph node metastases (28.9 vs. 24.9; p = 0.30) or in bone metastases (22.9 vs. 27.6; p = 0.286). In [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 PET, more patients featured presumable unspecific uptake in the lymph nodes (52.2% vs. 28.3%; p: < 0.001), bones (71.7% vs. 23.9%; p < 0.001) and ganglia (71.7% vs. 43.5%; p < 0.001). Probable unspecific, exclusively [18F]-F-PSMA-1007-positive lesions mainly occurred in the ribs (58.7%), axillary lymph nodes (39.1%) and cervical ganglia (28.3%). CONCLUSION In terms of miTNM staging, both tracers appeared widely exchangeable, as no tracer relevantly outperformed the other. The differences between the two tracers were far more common in presumable unspecific lesions than in malignant spots. A routinely performed two-tracer study could not be shown to be superior. Since it seems at least challenging for most nuclear medicine departments to provide both [18F]-F-PSMA-1007 and [68Ga]-Ga-PSMA-11, it appears reasonable to choose the PSMA radiotracer depending on local availability with attention to the greater occurrence of nonspecific bone findings with [18F]-F-PSMA-1007.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Hoberück
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. .,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Helios Klinikum Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany.
| | - Steffen Löck
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Angelika Borkowetz
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Ulrich Sommer
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Robert Winzer
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Dieter Fedders
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Enrico Michler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jörg Kotzerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Tobias Hölscher
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Anja Braune
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kessler L, Ferdinandus J, Hirmas N, Zarrad F, Nader M, Kersting D, Weber M, Kazek S, Sraieb M, Hamacher R, Lueckerath K, Umutlu L, Fendler WP, Rischpler C. Pitfalls and common findings in 68Ga-FAPI-PET - A pictorial analysis. J Nucl Med 2021; 63:890-896. [PMID: 34620730 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.121.262808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 08/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Fibroblast activation protein inhibitor positron emission tomography (FAPI-PET) is a new tool in the diagnostic workup of cancer. With growing volume of applications pitfalls and common findings need to be considered for Ga-68-FAPI-PET image interpretation. The aim of this study was to summarize common findings and report pitfalls in Ga-68-FAPI-PET. Methods and materials: 91 patients underwent whole-body PET/CT with either FAPI-04 (N = 25) or FAPI-46 (N = 66). Findings were rated in a consensus session of two experienced readers. Pitfalls and common findings were defined as focal or localized uptake above background and categorized as unspecific / non-malignant and grouped into degenerative, muscular, scarring / wound-healing, uterine, mammary glands and head-and-neck findings. Frequency of findings was reported on a per-patient and per-group basis and SUVmax, SUVmean and SUVpeak was measured. Results: Non-tumor specific tracer uptake was found in 81.3 % of patients. The most frequent finding was tracer uptake in degenerative lesions (51.6%) with mean SUVmax 7.7 ± 2.9 and head-and-neck (45.1%) findings. Except for salivary glands, the uptake values did not differ between 10 and 60 min p.i. in most findings. Uterine uptake was found in most women (66.7%) with mean SUVmax 12.2 ± 7.3 and uptake correlated negatively with age (SUVmax r = -0.6, p<0.01; SUVpeak r = -0.57, p<0.01; SUVmean r = -0.58, p<0.01). Conclusion: Pitfalls include non-tumor specific Ga-68-FAPI uptake in degenerative lesions, muscle, head-and-neck, scarring, mammary glands or uterus. Here we summarize findings to inform readers at centers introducing Ga-68-FAPI-PET to avoid common mistakes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lukas Kessler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Justin Ferdinandus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Nader Hirmas
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Fadi Zarrad
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Michael Nader
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - David Kersting
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Sandra Kazek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Miriam Sraieb
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Rainer Hamacher
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen
| | - Katharina Lueckerath
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Duisburg-Essen
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Rischpler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jayaprakasam VS, Paroder V, Schöder H. Variants and Pitfalls in PET/CT Imaging of Gastrointestinal Cancers. Semin Nucl Med 2021; 51:485-501. [PMID: 33965198 PMCID: PMC8338802 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2021.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
In the past two decades, PET/CT has become an essential modality in oncology increasingly used in the management of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Most PET/CT tracers used in clinical practice show some degree of GI uptake. This uptake is quite variable and knowledge of common patterns of biodistribution of various radiotracers is helpful in clinical practice. 18F-Fluoro-Deoxy-Glucose (FDG) is the most commonly used radiotracer and has quite a variable uptake within the bowel. 68Ga-Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) shows intense uptake within the proximal small bowel loops. 11C-methyl-L-methionine (MET) shows high accumulation within the bowels, which makes it difficult to assess bowel or pelvic diseases. One must also be aware of technical artifacts causing difficulties in interpretations, such as high attenuation oral contrast material within the bowel lumen or misregistration artifact due to patient movements. It is imperative to know the common variants and benign diseases that can mimic malignant pathologies. Intense FDG uptake within the esophagus and stomach may be a normal variant or may be associated with benign conditions such as esophagitis, reflux disease, or gastritis. Metformin can cause diffuse intense uptake throughout the bowel loops. Intense physiologic uptake can also be seen within the anal canal. Segmental bowel uptake can be seen in inflammatory bowel disease, radiation, or medication induced enteritis/colitis or infection. Diagnosis of appendicitis or diverticular disease requires CT correlation, as normal appendix or diverticulum can show intense uptake. Certain malignant pathologies are known to have only low FDG uptake, such as early-stage esophageal adenocarcinoma, mucinous tumors, indolent lymphomas, and multicystic mesotheliomas. Response assessment, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting, can be limited by post-treatment inflammatory changes. Post-operative complications such as abscess or fistula formation can also show intense uptake and may obscure underlying malignant pathology. In the absence of clinical suspicion or rising tumor marker, the role of FDG PET/CT in routine surveillance of patients with GI malignancy is not clear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vetri Sudar Jayaprakasam
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Viktoriya Paroder
- Body Imaging Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Heiko Schöder
- Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sandhu S, Guo C, Hofman MS. Radionuclide Therapy in Prostate Cancer: from standalone to combination PSMA theranostics. J Nucl Med 2021; 62:jnumed.120.243295. [PMID: 34385339 PMCID: PMC8612178 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.120.243295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite significant advances in prostate cancer therapeutic development over the last two decades, metastatic prostate cancer remains a lethal disease. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), which is markedly overexpressed by prostate cancer cells, including at metastatic sites, but have low normal tissue expression, has emerged as an important theranostic target for these diseases. Both beta-emitting and alpha-emitting PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy (RNT) are in clinical development. Several of these agents have already shown promising activity, however, a significant subset of patients have primary resistant disease and secondary resistance invariably occurs. Further, the effect of these therapies on healthy organs limit their therapeutic window. Elucidating the biology of PSMA as well as characterising the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of PSMA-targeted RNT will facilitate therapeutic approaches aimed at improving efficacy and safety. In this review, we provide an overview of existing PSMA-targeting RNT and an update on novel combinatorial approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shahneen Sandhu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Christina Guo
- Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
- Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom; and
| | - Michael S. Hofman
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Alberts IL, Seifert R, Rahbar K, Afshar-Oromieh A. Prostate Cancer Theranostics: From Target Description to Imaging. PET Clin 2021; 16:383-390. [PMID: 34053582 DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen-PET/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) is the investigation of choice for imaging prostate cancer. Demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy, PSMA-PET/CT detects disease at very early stages of recurrence, where the chances of a definitive cure may be at their greatest. A number of PSMA-radioligands are in established clinical routine, and there are currently only limited data and no single tracer can clearly be advocated over the others at present. Further clinical trial data, comparing and contrasting radiotracers and reporting outcome-based data are necessary to further increase the implementation of this very promising imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian L Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Robert Seifert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany; West German Cancer Centre, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kambiz Rahbar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany; West German Cancer Centre, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
[ 68Ga]Ga-P16-093 as a PSMA-Targeted PET Radiopharmaceutical for Detection of Cancer: Initial Evaluation and Comparison with [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in Prostate Cancer Patients Presenting with Biochemical Recurrence. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 22:752-763. [PMID: 31429050 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01421-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study was undertaken to evaluate radiation dosimetry for the prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 radiopharmaceutical, and to initially assess agent performance in positron emission tomography (PET) detection of the site of disease in prostate cancer patients presenting with biochemical recurrence. PROCEDURES Under IND 133,222 and an IRB-approved research protocol, we evaluated the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 with serial PET imaging following intravenous administration to ten prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence. The recruited subjects were all patients in whom a recent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) exam had been independently performed under IND 131,806 to assist in decision-making with regard to their clinical care. Voided urine was collected from each subject at ~ 60 min and ~ 140 min post-[68Ga]Ga-P16-093 injection and assayed for Ga-68 content. Following image segmentation to extract tissue time-activity curves and corresponding cumulated activity values, radiation dosimetry estimates were calculated using IDAC Dose 2.1. The prior [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT exam (whole-body PET imaging at 60 min post-injection, performed with contrast-enhanced diagnostic CT) served as a reference scan for comparison to the [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 findings. RESULTS [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 PET images at 60 min post-injection provided diagnostic information that appeared equivalent to the subject's prior [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 scan. With both radiopharmaceuticals, sites of tumor recurrence were found in eight of the ten patients, identifying 16 lesions. The site of recurrence was not detected with either agent for the other two subjects. Bladder activity was consistently lower with [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 than [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11. The kidneys, spleen, salivary glands, and liver receive the highest radiation exposure from [68Ga]Ga-P16-093, with estimated doses of 1.7 × 10-1, 6.7 × 10-2, 6.5 × 10-2, and 5.6 × 10-2 mGy/MBq, respectively. The corresponding effective dose from [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 is 2.3 × 10-2 mSv/MBq. CONCLUSIONS [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 provided diagnostic information that appeared equivalent to [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 in this limited series of ten prostate cancer patients presenting with biochemical recurrence, with the kidneys found to be the critical organ. Diminished tracer appearance in the urine represents a potential advantage of [68Ga]Ga-P16-093 over [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 for detection of lesions in the pelvis.
Collapse
|
37
|
Guberina N, Hetkamp P, Ruebben H, Fendler W, Grueneisen J, Suntharalingam S, Kirchner J, Puellen L, Harke N, Radtke JP, Umutlu L, Hadaschik BA, Herrmann K, Forsting M, Wetter A. Whole-Body Integrated [ 68Ga]PSMA-11-PET/MR Imaging in Patients with Recurrent Prostate Cancer: Comparison with Whole-Body PET/CT as the Standard of Reference. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 22:788-796. [PMID: 31482413 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01424-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the detection rate of [68Ga]prostate-specific membrane antigen ([68Ga]PSMA-11) positron emission tomography (PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and to compare it with [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/X-ray computed tomography (CT) in patients with recurrent prostate cancer (PC) after radical prostatectomy. PROCEDURES A total of 93 patients with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer underwent [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT and subsequently a whole-body integrated PET/MRI examination. Board certified nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists evaluated PET/CT and PET/MRI datasets regarding identification of tumor lesions ((i) lymph nodes, (ii) bone lesions, (iii) local recurrence, and (iv) parenchymal lesions) based on maximum [68Ga]PSMA-11 uptake as well as morphological changes. Quality of PET images for both PET/CT and PET/MRI were rated using a 5-point scoring system by evaluating lesion homogeneity, contrast, contour, and delineation. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to determine statistical differences. RESULTS PC relapse was detected in 62/93 patients. PET/MRI detected 148 out of 150 lesions described in PET/CT. In addition, PET/MRI detected 11 lesions not detected in PET/CT (5 lymph nodes, 6 local recurrences). The exact McNemar statistical test (one-sided) showed significant difference between PET/CT and PET/MRI for diagnosis of local recurrence (p value = 0.031). Diagnostic confidence for (iii) was higher in PET/MRI compared with PET/CT (PET/CT = 1.1; PET/MRI = 4.9). Diagnostic confidence for (i) (PET/CT = 4.9; PET/MRI = 4.6), (ii) (PET/CT = 4.9; PET/MRI = 4.6), and (iv) (PET/CT = 4.6; PET/MRI = 4.8) was equivalent between PET/MRI and PET/CT. CONCLUSIONS Integrated [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/MRI provides a similarly high diagnostic performance for localization of recurrent PC as PET/CT. For the detection of local recurrences [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/MRI is superior compared with [68Ga]PSMA-11 PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nika Guberina
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany. .,Department for Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany.
| | - P Hetkamp
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - H Ruebben
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - W Fendler
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J Grueneisen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - S Suntharalingam
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - J Kirchner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - L Puellen
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - N Harke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - J P Radtke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - L Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - B A Hadaschik
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - K Herrmann
- Clinic of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - M Forsting
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| | - A Wetter
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45147, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mittlmeier LM, Brendel M, Beyer L, Albert NL, Todica A, Zacherl MJ, Wenter V, Herlemann A, Kretschmer A, Ledderose ST, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Kunz WG, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Ilhan H, Unterrainer M. Feasibility of Different Tumor Delineation Approaches for 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT Imaging in Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:663631. [PMID: 34094956 PMCID: PMC8176856 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.663631] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Delineation of PSMA-positive tumor volume on PET using PSMA-ligands is of highest clinical interest as changes of PSMA-PET/CT-derived whole tumor volume (WTV) have shown to correlate with treatment response in metastatic prostate cancer patients. So far, WTV estimation was performed on PET using 68Ga-labeled ligands; nonetheless, 18F-labeled PET ligands are gaining increasing importance due to advantages over 68Ga-labeled compounds. However, standardized tumor delineation methods for 18F-labeled PET ligands have not been established so far. As correlation of PET-based information and morphological extent in osseous and visceral metastases is hampered by morphological delineation, low contrast in liver tissue and movement artefacts, we correlated CT-based volume of lymph node metastases (LNM) and different PET-based delineation approaches for thresholding on 18F-PSMA-1007 PET. Methods Fifty patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and non-bulky LNM (short-axis diameter ≥10mm) were included. Fifty LNM were volumetrically assessed on contrast-enhanced CT (volumetric reference standard). Different approaches for tumor volume delineation were applied and correlated with the reference standard: I) fixed SUV threshold, II) isocontour thresholding relative to SUVmax (SUV%), and thresholds relative to III) liver (SUVliver), IV) parotis (SUVparotis) and V) spleen (SUVspleen). Results A fixed SUV of 4.0 (r=0.807, r2 = 0.651, p<0.001) showed the best overall association with the volumetric reference. 55% SUVmax (r=0.627, r2 = 0.393, p<0.001) showed highest association using an isocontour-based threshold. Best background-based approaches were 60% SUVliver (r=0.715, r2 = 0.511, p<0.001), 80% SUVparotis (r=0.762, r2 = 0.581, p<0.001) and 60% SUVspleen (r=0.645, r2 = 0.416, p<0.001). Background tissues SUVliver, SUVparotis & SUVspleen did not correlate (p>0.05 each). Recently reported cut-offs for intraprostatic tumor delineation (isocontour 44% SUVmax, 42% SUVmax and 20% SUVmax) revealed inferior association for LNM delineation. Conclusions A threshold of SUV 4.0 for tumor delineation showed highest association with volumetric reference standard irrespective of potential changes in PSMA-avidity of background tissues (e. g. parotis). This approach is easily applicable in clinical routine without specific software requirements. Further studies applying this approach for total tumor volume delineation are initiated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lena M Mittlmeier
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Matthias Brendel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Leonie Beyer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Andrei Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias J Zacherl
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Vera Wenter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Annika Herlemann
- Department of Urology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Wolfgang G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Ludwig Maximilian University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Marcus Unterrainer
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mingels C, Sachpekidis C, Bohn KP, Hünermund JN, Schepers R, Fech V, Prenosil G, Rominger A, Afshar-Oromieh A, Alberts I. The influence of colour scale in lesion detection and patient-based sensitivity in [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-PET/CT. Nucl Med Commun 2021; 42:495-502. [PMID: 33481506 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the influence of colour scales on the interpretation of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. METHODS 50 consecutive patients who underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer were selected for this retrospective study. The scans were randomised, anonymised and read by five different readers first in the visually nonlinear colour scale 'PET-rainbow'. Scans were then rerandomised and read in the visually linear colour scale 'hot-metal new'. For each scan in each colour scale the numbers of pathological, equivocal and benign lesions were noted. Scans where the majority of readers (≥3) reported at least one PET-positive lesion were recorded as 'pathological'. Patient-level sensitivity was obtained by composite standard with 14.8 ± 1.2 months of follow-up. RESULTS Increased numbers of lesions per patient were reported for all readers in PET-rainbow compared to hot-metal new (37.4 ± 15.2 vs. 33.9 ± 16.4, respectively, P = 0.0005). On a per-patient basis, 43 scans were rated pathological in PET-rainbow, compared to 39 in hot-metal new. Follow-up was available for 30 patients confirming 26 pathological scans with positive follow-up in PET-rainbow, and 23 in hot-metal new. Three pathological scans were missed in hot-metal new. Patient-level sensitivity was higher for PET-rainbow (0.96) compared to hot-metal new (0.85). Inter-reader reliability was higher for hot-metal new (Fleiss κ = 0.76) compared to PET-rainbow (Fleiss κ = 0.60). CONCLUSION Use of PET-rainbow was associated with improved lesion detection and sensitivity compared to hot-metal new, although at cost of reduced inter-rater agreement. Consequently, the use of PET-rainbow for clinical routine and future studies involving [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clemens Mingels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ceci F, Oprea-Lager DE, Emmett L, Adam JA, Bomanji J, Czernin J, Eiber M, Haberkorn U, Hofman MS, Hope TA, Kumar R, Rowe SP, Schwarzenboeck SM, Fanti S, Herrmann K. E-PSMA: the EANM standardized reporting guidelines v1.0 for PSMA-PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:1626-1638. [PMID: 33604691 PMCID: PMC8113168 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05245-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 176] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE The development of consensus guidelines for interpretation of Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-Positron Emission Tomography (PET) is needed to provide more consistent reports in clinical practice. The standardization of PSMA-PET interpretation may also contribute to increasing the data reproducibility within clinical trials. Finally, guidelines in PSMA-PET interpretation are needed to communicate the exact location of findings to referring physicians, to support clinician therapeutic management decisions. METHODS A panel of worldwide experts in PSMA-PET was established. Panelists were selected based on their expertise and publication record in the diagnosis or treatment of PCa, in their involvement in clinical guidelines and according to their expertise in the clinical application of radiolabeled PSMA inhibitors. Panelists were actively involved in all stages of a modified, nonanonymous, Delphi consensus process. RESULTS According to the findings obtained by modified Delphi consensus process, panelist recommendations were implemented in a structured report for PSMA-PET. CONCLUSIONS The E-PSMA standardized reporting guidelines, a document supported by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), provide consensus statements among a panel of experts in PSMA-PET imaging, to develop a structured report for PSMA-PET in prostate cancer and to harmonize diagnostic interpretation criteria.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ceci
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU University Medical Center, Cancer Center Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Louise Emmett
- St. Vincent's Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia
- Department of Theranostics and Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Judit A Adam
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jamshed Bomanji
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Johannes Czernin
- Ahmanson Translational Theranostics Division, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Matthias Eiber
- School of Medicine, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Molecular Imaging and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rakesh Kumar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Steven P Rowe
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Stefano Fanti
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Shi Y, Wu JG, Xu L, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Huang G, Liu J, Chen R. The Heterogeneous Metabolic Patterns of Ganglia in 68Ga-PSMA, 11C-choline, and 18F-FDG PET/CT in Prostate Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2021; 11:666308. [PMID: 33968772 PMCID: PMC8103210 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.666308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Studies have indicated that PSMA-positive ganglia represent a diagnostic pitfall for nuclear medicine physicians. No studies have described choline and FDG uptake in ganglia, which may be a source of misdiagnosis. Herein, we described the percentage and uptake pattern of 68Ga-PSMA, 11C-choline and 18F-FDG PET/CT in ganglia and evaluated the heterogeneous metabolic patterns of ganglia to differentiate from lymph node metastases (LNM). Methods Thirty-nine patients who underwent 11C-choline PET/CT and 120 patients who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and 18F-FDG PET/CT were retrospectively analyzed. The prevalence of PSMA-positive, choline-positive and FDG-positive ganglia was determined, the SUVmax of ganglia in different locations were measured, and the configuration was described. The SUVmax cutoff of PSMA-PET, choline-PET and FDG-PET was determined by ROC curve analysis to differentiate ganglia from LNM. Results 329 PSMA-positive ganglia were identified in 120 patients, 95 choline-positive ganglia were identified in 39 patients, and 39 FDG-positive ganglia were identified in 34 patients. PSMA-positive uptake was observed in 98.3%, 95.8%, and 80.0% of cervical, coeliac, and sacral ganglia, respectively. Choline-positive uptake was observed in 84.6%, 97.4%, and 61.5% of cervical, coeliac, and sacral ganglia, respectively. FDG-positive uptake was observed in 16.7%, 13.3%, and 2.5% of cervical, coeliac, and sacral ganglia, respectively. Cervical and coeliac ganglia had a higher rate of PSMA-positive uptake than sacral ganglia. Choline uptake was highest in coeliac ganglia followed by cervical and sacral ganglia. PSMA, choline or FDG uptake in LNM was all significantly higher than ganglia. ROC curve analysis revealed that at a 4.1 SUVmax cutoff of PSMA-PET, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of LNM identification was 88.4%, 97.9% and 96.2%, respectively. ROC curve analysis revealed that at a 2.35 SUVmax cutoff for choline-PET, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LNM identification was 95.0%, 92.6% and 93.0%, respectively. ROC curve analysis revealed that at a 2.55 SUVmax cutoff for FDG-PET, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of LNM identification was 77.3%, 87.2%, and 81.9%, respectively. PSMA-, Choline- and FDG-positive ganglia are mainly band-shaped; most LNMs exhibited nodular and teardrop-shaped configuration. Conclusion 68Ga-PSMA and 11C-choline uptake in ganglia was common, and FDG-positive ganglia were observed at lower frequency. Using 68Ga-PSMA, 11C-choline and 18F-FDG uptake and anatomic location and configuration, the differentiation of ganglia from adjacent LNM is feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiping Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jian Guo Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospital, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Lian Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinjie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yining Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gan Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruohua Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Céspedes MS, Radtke JP, Cathelineau X, Sanchez-Salas R. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and Prostate Cancer Staging: is our current conventional staging obsolete? Int Braz J Urol 2021; 47:1243-1249. [PMID: 33861056 PMCID: PMC8486444 DOI: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2020.0997] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jan Philipp Radtke
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany.,Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Xavier Cathelineau
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Osman MM, Iravani A, Hofman MS, Hicks RJ. Intra-patient comparison of physiologic 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT uptake in ganglia in prostate cancer patients: a pictorial essay. Cancer Imaging 2021; 21:35. [PMID: 33863390 PMCID: PMC8052677 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-021-00404-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent studies reported metabolic uptake in at least one of the evaluated ganglia in 98.5% of patients undergoing 68Ga -PSMA-11 and in 96.9% of patients undergoing 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT examination. We have observed different patterns of ganglion visualization with 18F-DCFPyL compared to 68Ga-PSMA-11. This includes more frequent visualization of cervical and sacral ganglia, which may be attributable to better imaging characteristics with 18F PET imaging. Case presentation This pictorial essay is to illustrate and compare, in the same patient, various representative cases of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT uptake in ganglia at different anatomic locations, with different patterns and distribution of metabolic activity. Conclusion Reading physicians should be aware of the frequently encountered and occasionally different physiologic uptake of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F DCFPyL in different ganglia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Medhat M Osman
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Saint Louis University Hospital, St. Louis, MO, USA.
| | - Amir Iravani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.,Centre for Molecular Imaging, Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael S Hofman
- Centre for Molecular Imaging, Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rodney J Hicks
- Centre for Molecular Imaging, Department of Cancer Imaging, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Alberts I, Hünermund JN, Sachpekidis C, Mingels C, Fech V, Bohn KP, Rominger A, Afshar-Oromieh A. The influence of digital PET/CT on diagnostic certainty and interrater reliability in [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for recurrent prostate cancer. Eur Radiol 2021; 31:8030-8039. [PMID: 33856522 PMCID: PMC8452558 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07870-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Objective To investigate the impact of digital PET/CT on diagnostic certainty, patient-based sensitivity and interrater reliability. Methods Four physicians retrospectively evaluated two matched cohorts of patients undergoing [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on a digital (dPET/CT n = 65) or an analogue scanner (aPET/CT n = 65) for recurrent prostate cancer between 11/2018 and 03/2019. The number of equivocal and pathological lesions as well as the frequency of discrepant findings and the interrater reliability for the two scanners were compared. Results dPET/CT detected more lesions than aPET/CT (p < 0.001). A higher number of pathological scans were observed for dPET/CT (83% vs. 57%, p < 0.001). The true-positive rate at follow-up was 100% for dPET/CT compared to 84% for aPET/CT (p < 0.001). The proportion of lesions rated as non-pathological as a total of all PSMA-avid lesions detected for dPET/CT was comparable to aPET/CT (61.8% vs. 57.0%, p = 0.99). Neither a higher rate of diagnostically uncertain lesions (11.5% dPET/CT vs. 13.7% aPET/CT, p = 0.95) nor discrepant scans (where one or more readers differed in opinion as to whether the scan is pathological) were observed (18% dPET/CT vs. 17% aPET/CT, p = 0.76). Interrater reliability for pathological lesions was excellent for both scanner types (Cronbach’s α = 0.923 dPET/CT; α = 0.948 aPET/CT) and interrater agreement was substantial for dPET/CT (Krippendorf’s α = 0.701) and almost perfect in aPET/CT (α = 0.802). Conclusions A higher detection rate for pathological lesions for dPET/CT compared with aPET/CT in multiple readers was observed. This improved sensitivity was coupled with an improved true-positive rate and was not associated with increased diagnostic uncertainty, rate of non-specific lesions, or reduced interrater reliability. Key Points • New generation digital scanners detect more cancer lesions in men with prostate cancer. • When using digital scanners, the doctors are able to diagnose prostate cancer lesions with better certainty • When using digital scanners, the doctors do not disagree with each other more than with other scanner types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Alberts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland.
| | - Jan-Niklas Hünermund
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Christos Sachpekidis
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Clemens Mingels
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Viktor Fech
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Karl Peter Bohn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Axel Rominger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ali Afshar-Oromieh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Freiburgstr. 18, 3010, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Shi Y, Xu L, Zhu Y, Wang Y, Chen R, Liu J. Use of 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-FDG PET-CT Dual-Tracer to Differentiate Between Lymph Node Metastases and Ganglia. Front Oncol 2021; 11:646110. [PMID: 33777806 PMCID: PMC7987919 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.646110] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2020] [Accepted: 02/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Differentiating lymph node metastases (LNM) from peripheral ganglia by physiological prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) uptake is challenging. Two tracers (68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose [FDG]) metabolic uptake patterns were evaluated by positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT), searching for differences that could tell ganglia from LNM. Methods Dual 68Ga-PSMA-11 and 18F-FDG PET-CT data of 138 prostate cancer patients acquired from June 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Ganglia and LNM with PSMA-11 uptake above local background were analyzed by the location and PSMA-11-PET and FDG-PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax). Results PSMA-11-positive ganglia (n = 381) and LNM (n = 83) were identified in 138 and 58 patients, respectively. The LNM SUVmax of PSMA-11-PET (16.4 ± 14.8 vs 2.3 ± 0.7, P < 0.001) and FDG-PET (3.3 ± 3.2 vs 1.5 ± 0.5, P < 0.001) were higher than in ganglia. The probabilities of being an LNM in the low-potential (PSMA-11-PET SUVmax of <4.1 and FDG-PET SUVmax of <2.05), moderate-potential (PSMA-11-PET SUVmax of >4.1 and FDG-PET SUVmax of <2.05, or PSMA-11-PET SUVmax of <4.1 and FDG-PET SUVmax of >2.05), and high-potential (PSMA-11-PET SUVmax of >4.1 and FDG-PET SUVmax of >2.05) groups were 0.9% (3/334), 44.6% (37/83), and 91.5% (43/47), respectively (P < 0.001). The cervical and coeliac ganglia had higher PSMA-11 and FDG uptake than the sacral ganglia (P < 0.001 for all). LNM PSMA-11 and FDG uptake was similar in these three locations. Conclusion The FDG-PET and PSMA-11-PET SUVmax, especially when combined, could well differentiate LNM from ganglia. The tracers uptake differed between cervical/coeliac and sacral ganglia, so the lesion location should be considered during image assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yiping Shi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Lian Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yinjie Zhu
- Department of Urology, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yining Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Ruohua Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianjun Liu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ren Ji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Weber M, Jentzen W, Hofferber R, Herrmann K, Fendler WP, Conti M, Wetter A, Kersting D, Rischpler C, Fragoso Costa P. Evaluation of [ 68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT images acquired with a reduced scan time duration in prostate cancer patients using the digital biograph vision. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:21. [PMID: 33641046 PMCID: PMC7914332 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-021-00765-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/09/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Aim [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT allows for a superior detection of prostate cancer tissue, especially in the context of a low tumor burden. Digital PET/CT bears the potential of reducing scan time duration/administered tracer activity due to, for instance, its higher sensitivity and improved time coincidence resolution. It might thereby expand [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT that is currently limited by 68Ge/68Ga-generator yield. Our aim was to clinically evaluate the influence of a reduced scan time duration in combination with different image reconstruction algorithms on the diagnostic performance. Methods Twenty prostate cancer patients (11 for biochemical recurrence, 5 for initial staging, 4 for metastatic disease) sequentially underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT on a digital Siemens Biograph Vision. PET data were collected in continuous-bed-motion mode with a mean scan time duration of 16.7 min (reference acquisition protocol) and 4.6 min (reduced acquisition protocol). Four iterative reconstruction algorithms were applied using a time-of-flight (TOF) approach alone or combined with point-spread-function (PSF) correction, each with 2 or 4 iterations. To evaluate the diagnostic performance, the following metrics were chosen: (a) per-region detectability, (b) the tumor maximum and peak standardized uptake values (SUVmax and SUVpeak), and (c) image noise using the liver’s activity distribution. Results Overall, 98% of regions (91% of affected regions) were correctly classified in the reduced acquisition protocol independent of the image reconstruction algorithm. Two nodal lesions (each ≤ 4 mm) were not identified (leading to downstaging in 1/20 cases). Mean absolute percentage deviation of SUVmax (SUVpeak) was approximately 9% (6%) for each reconstruction algorithm. The mean image noise increased from 13 to 21% (4 iterations) and from 10 to 15% (2 iterations) for PSF + TOF and TOF images. Conclusions High agreement at 3.5-fold reduction of scan time in terms of per-region detection (98% of regions) and image quantification (mean deviation ≤ 10%) was demonstrated; however, small lesions can be missed in about 10% of patients leading to downstaging (T1N0M0 instead of T1N1M0) in 5% of patients. Our results suggest that a reduction of scan time duration or administered [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 activities can be considered in metastatic patients, where missing small lesions would not impact patient management. Limitations include the small and heterogeneous sample size and the lack of follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manuel Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany.
| | - Walter Jentzen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Regina Hofferber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Peter Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Axel Wetter
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - David Kersting
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Christoph Rischpler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| | - Pedro Fragoso Costa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Hufelandstrasse 55, 45122, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Kuten J, Dekalo S, Mintz I, Yossepowitch O, Mano R, Even-Sapir E. The significance of equivocal bone findings in staging PSMA imaging in the preoperative setting: validation of the PSMA-RADS version 1.0. EJNMMI Res 2021; 11:3. [PMID: 33409930 PMCID: PMC7788112 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-020-00745-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 12/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Assessing the extent of disease in newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PC) patients is crucial for tailoring an appropriate treatment approach. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) reportedly has greater accuracy than conventional imaging for staging PC. As with any imaging modality, pitfalls and nonspecific findings do occur. The PSMA reporting and data system (PSMA-RADS) version 1.0 offers structured interpretation of PSMA-targeted studies and classifies lesions by likelihood of clinical significance. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate the clinical significance of equivocal bone findings on staging PSMA-targeted imaging, as defined by PSMA-RADS version 1.0, in the preoperative setting. Fifteen of 406 consecutive patients staged by PET/CT prior to radical prostatectomy had equivocal bone lesions. The scans were retrospectively scored with the PSMA-RADS version 1.0 system, blinded to disease course and follow-up data. Postoperative persistence of prostate-specific antigen levels supported by imaging and histological findings was used as the reference standard for the true significance of equivocal imaging findings. RESULTS Thirteen of the 15 patients had an overall PSMA-RADS score of 3B, of whom only two had true metastatic disease. The remaining patients had scores of 4 (n = 1) or 5 (n = 1), all confirmed as true positive prostate-related malignant lesions. A per-lesion analysis identified 29 bone lesions, of which 27 were scored PSMA-RADS 3B, and only three of them were true metastases. Thus, debatable lesions proved to have no clinical significance in 84.6% of cases, and only 11% of equivocal PSMA-RADS 3B bone lesions were true positive. CONCLUSIONS In intermediate and high-risk patients staged prior to radical prostatectomy, the majority of PSMA-RADS 3B lesions are of no clinical relevance. Bone lesions judged as being highly suspicious for metastases (PSMA-RADS 4/5) were all validated as true positives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Kuten
- Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel-Aviv, Israel. .,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel.
| | - Snir Dekalo
- Departments of Urology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ishai Mintz
- Departments of Urology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Ofer Yossepowitch
- Departments of Urology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Roy Mano
- Departments of Urology, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Einat Even-Sapir
- Departments of Nuclear Medicine, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, 6 Weizmann St, 6423906, Tel-Aviv, Israel.,Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Mettler J, Drzezga A, Dietlein M, Hucho T, Kobe C. Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Uptake in a Peripheral Nerve and Respective Ganglia on 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-HBED-CC PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2021; 46:69-70. [PMID: 33208621 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000003401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
A 74-year-old man with a history of prostate cancer with proven osseous metastatic disease underwent Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT under antiandrogen therapy. The scan revealed a long segment of increased PSMA tracer uptake within the right sciatic nerve, which appeared edematous and swollen, and the respective ganglia. Clinically, the patient suffered from pain and paresis in the right leg. As infiltration of a long segment of a single nerve seems unlikely, primarily neuronal disease such as neuritis (induced by metastases or radiotherapy) was considered. The observed uptake of PSMA-targeting PET tracers may then represent a peripheral nerve disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jasmin Mettler
- From the Department for Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Center for Integrated, Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf
| | - Alexander Drzezga
- From the Department for Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Center for Integrated, Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf
| | - Markus Dietlein
- From the Department for Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Center for Integrated, Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf
| | - Tim Hucho
- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- From the Department for Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, Center for Integrated, Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted PET imaging for prostate cancer recurrence. Curr Opin Urol 2020; 30:635-640. [PMID: 32732621 DOI: 10.1097/mou.0000000000000793] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted PET imaging (PSMA PET) of biochemically recurrent prostate cancer (BCR) is implemented in routine management in many countries and recommended in European Association of Urology (EAU) and American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) guidelines. Purpose of this review is to summarize recently published evidence of accuracy, management impact, and clinical benefit of PSMA PET in this setting and to state our opinion on the role of PSMA PET in future trials and clinical routine to improve patient outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS The past two years saw an increase of evidence supporting superior detection rates and accuracy of PSMA PET versus standard imaging and other PET radiotracers in the localization of BCR. Systematic reviews, prospective trials and large-scale retrospective studies establish PSMA PET as a new benchmark imaging in this setting and demonstrate considerable impact on therapeutic and diagnostic management. Multiple studies have highlighted pitfalls of PSMA PET imaging warranting attention while interpreting these scans. SUMMARY PSMA PET is the new imaging method of choice in BCR. Recent evidence shows unprecedented accuracy and high detection rates along with translation into management changes in a majority of patients. However, improvement of oncologic outcome has not been assessed yet. Implementation of PSMA PET into clinical trials and management of BCR will be crucial to demonstrate outcome improvement.
Collapse
|
50
|
Sistani G, Metser U, Bauman GS, Laidley DT, Pautler SE, Zukotynski KA. Case series - 18F-DCFPyL-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) time of imaging. Can Urol Assoc J 2020; 15:E376-E379. [PMID: 33382375 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.6984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Golmehr Sistani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ur Metser
- Department of Radiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Glenn S Bauman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - David T Laidley
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Stephen E Pautler
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|