Feasibility of 18F-FDG Dose Reductions in Breast Cancer PET/MRI

The Clinical Added Value of Breast Cancer Imaging Using Hybrid PET/MR Imaging

Dedicated MR imaging is highly performant for the evaluation of the primary lesion and should regularly be added to whole-body PET/MR imaging for the initial staging. PET/MR imaging is highly sensitive for the detection of nodal involvement and could be combined with the high specificity of axillary second look ultrasound for the confirmation of the N staging. For M staging, with the exception of lung lesions, PET/MR imaging is superior to PET/computed tomography, at half the radiation dose. The predictive value of multiparametric imaging with PET/MR imaging holds promise to improve through radiomics and artificial intelligence.

International EANM-SNMMI-ISMRM consensus recommendation for PET/MRI in oncology

PREAMBLE

The Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI) is an international scientific and professional organization founded in 1954 to promote the science, technology, and practical application of nuclear medicine. The European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) is a professional non-profit medical association that facilitates communication worldwide between individuals pursuing clinical and research excellence in nuclear medicine. The EANM was founded in 1985. The merged International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) is an international, nonprofit, scientific association whose purpose is to promote communication, research, development, and applications in the field of magnetic resonance in medicine and biology and other related topics and to develop and provide channels and facilities for continuing education in the field.The ISMRM was founded in 1994 through the merger of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the Society of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM members are physicians, technologists, and scientists specializing in the research and practice of nuclear medicine and/or magnetic resonance imaging. The SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM will periodically define new guidelines for nuclear medicine practice to help advance the science of nuclear medicine and/or magnetic resonance imaging and to improve the quality of service to patients throughout the world. Existing practice guidelines will be reviewed for revision or renewal, as appropriate, on their fifth anniversary or sooner, if indicated. Each practice guideline, representing a policy statement by the SNMMI/EANM/ISMRM, has undergone a thorough consensus process in which it has been subjected to extensive review. The SNMMI, ISMRM, and EANM recognize that the safe and effective use of diagnostic nuclear medicine imaging and magnetic resonance imaging requires specific training, skills, and techniques, as described in each document. Reproduction or modification of the published practice guideline by those entities not providing these services is not authorized. These guidelines are an educational tool designed to assist practitioners in providing appropriate care for patients. They are not inflexible rules or requirements of practice and are not intended, nor should they be used, to establish a legal standard of care. For these reasons and those set forth below, the SNMMI, the ISMRM, and the EANM caution against the use of these guidelines in litigation in which the clinical decisions of a practitioner are called into question. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure or course of action must be made by the physician or medical physicist in light of all the circumstances presented. Thus, there is no implication that an approach differing from the guidelines, standing alone, is below the standard of care. To the contrary, a conscientious practitioner may responsibly adopt a course of action different from that set forth in the guidelines when, in the reasonable judgment of the practitioner, such course of action is indicated by the condition of the patient, limitations of available resources, or advances in knowledge or technology subsequent to publication of the guidelines. The practice of medicine includes both the art and the science of the prevention, diagnosis, alleviation, and treatment of disease. The variety and complexity of human conditions make it impossible to always reach the most appropriate diagnosis or to predict with certainty a particular response to treatment. Therefore, it should be recognized that adherence to these guidelines will not ensure an accurate diagnosis or a successful outcome. All that should be expected is that the practitioner will follow a reasonable course of action based on current knowledge, available resources, and the needs of the patient to deliver effective and safe medical care. The sole purpose of these guidelines is to assist practitioners in achieving this objective.

What radiolabeled FAPI pet can add in breast cancer? A systematic review from literature

To provide an overview of the current available data about FAPI PET in breast cancer patients, with a perspective point of view. A literature search for studies about FAPI PET in the last 5 years (from 2017 to January 2023) was carried out on MEDLINE databases, such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Google Scholar using the following keywords: "PET" AND "FAPI" AND "Breast Cancer" AND "Fibroblast imaging". The Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) checklist for diagnostic test studies was used for testing the quality of selected papers. 13 articles were selected, including 172 patients affected by breast cancer who underwent FAPI-based PET images. CASP checklist was used in 5/13 papers, demonstrating a general low quality. Different types of FAPI-based tracers were used. No difference in terms of FAPI uptake was reported based on the histopathological characteristics, such as immunohistochemistry and grading of breast cancer. FAPI demonstrated more lesions and yielded much higher tumor-to-background ratios than 2-[18F]FDG. Preliminary experiences with FAPI PET in breast cancer showed some advantages than the current available 2-[18F]FDG, although prospective trials are needed to further evaluate its diagnostic utility in clinical practice.

Quantitative and visual analyses of the effect of activity reduction on image metrics and quality in 18F-FDG PET/MRI in pediatric oncology

BACKGROUND

: The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of reduced injected tracer activities on the quantitative image metrics and the visual image quality in whole-body 18F-FDG PET/MRI with TOF capability in pediatric oncology.

METHODS

Seventy-seven PET/MRI examinations of 54 patients were analyzed (standard injected activity: 1.9 MBq/kg, standard PET scan duration: 5 min per bed position). Lower activity PET images (1.2 MBq/kg and 0.9 MBq/kg) were retrospectively simulated from the originally acquired list-mode data sets. Quantitative parameters were assessed by measuring the SUV metrics, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR), and textural features in each PET data set. PET images were also evaluated visually for image quality by using a scoring system.

RESULTS

SNRs were found as significantly different among PET data sets (p < 0.001) and showed increasing image noise with decreasing activities. CNR values did not show significant differences among PET data sets. The mean relative percentage changes in SUV metrics were found to be lower in 1.2 MBq/kg data set compared to 0.9 MBq/kg data set. Lesion SUVmax, SUVmean, SULpeak, and textural features were significantly different in 0.9 MBq/kg data set compared to the original data set (p < 0.05 for all). However, SUV metrics and textural features did not show a significant difference between the original and 1.2 MBq/kg data sets. While, the mean visual scores in 0.9 MBq/kg data set were significantly different compared to the original data set (p < 0.001), there was no significant difference between the original and 1.2 MBq/kg data sets in terms of general image quality and image sharpness.

DISCUSSION

Our analyses showed that the reduction of injected activity to 1.2 MBq/kg may be feasible in pediatric oncological PET/ MRI, with a smaller relative percentage change in quantitative parameters and with similar image quality to the original data set.

Clinical advances in PET-MRI for breast cancer

Imaging is paramount for the early detection and clinical staging of breast cancer, as well as to inform management decisions and direct therapy. PET-MRI is a quantitative hybrid imaging technology that combines metabolic and functional PET data with anatomical detail and functional perfusion information from MRI. The clinical applicability of PET-MRI for breast cancer is an active area of research. In this Review, we discuss the rationale and summarise the clinical evidence for the use of PET-MRI in the diagnosis, staging, prognosis, tumour phenotyping, and assessment of treatment response in breast cancer. The continued development and approval of targeted radiopharmaceuticals, together with radiomics and automated analysis tools, will further expand the opportunity for PET-MRI to provide added value for breast cancer imaging and patient care.

Digital PET/CT allows for shorter acquisition protocols or reduced radiopharmaceutical dose in [18F]-FDG PET/CT

PURPOSE

To establish the feasibility of shorter acquisition times (and by analogy, applied activity) on tumour detection and lesion contrast in digital PET/CT.

METHODS

Twenty-one randomly selected patients who underwent oncological [18F]-FDG PET/CT on a digital PET/CT were retrospectively evaluated. Scan data were anonymously obtained and reconstructed in list-mode acquisition for a standard 2 min/bed position (bp), 1 min/bp and 30 s/bp (100%, 50% and 25% time or applied activity, respectively). Scans were randomized and read by two nuclear medicine physicians in a consensus read. Readers were blind to clinical details. Scans were evaluated for the number of pathological lesions detected. Measured uptake for lesions was evaluated by maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax and SUVmean, respectively) and tumour-to-backround ratio (TBR) were compared. Agreement between the three acquisitions was compared by Krippendorf's alpha.

RESULTS

Overall n = 100 lesions were identified in the 2 min and 1 min/bp acquisitions and n = 98 lesions in the 30 s/bp acquisitions. Agreement between the three acquisitions with respect to lesion number and tumour-to-background ratio showed almost perfect agreement (K's α = 0.999). SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR likewise showed > 98% agreement, with longer acquisitions being associated with slightly higher mean TBR (2 min/bp 7.94 ± 4.41 versus 30 s/bp 7.84 ± 4.22, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Shorter acquisition times have traditionally been associated with reduced lesion detectability or the requirement for larger amounts of radiotracer activity. These data confirm that this is not the case for new-generation digital PET scanners, where the known higher sensitivity results in clinically adequate images for shorter acquisitions. Only a small variation in the semi-quantitative parameters SUVmax, SUVmean and TBR was seen, confirming that either reduction of acquisition time or (by analogy) applied activity can be reduced as much as 75% in digital PET/CT without apparent clinical detriment.

Measuring Glucose Uptake in Primary Invasive Breast Cancer Using Simultaneous Time-of-Flight Breast PET/MRI: A Method Comparison Study with Prone PET/CT

Purpose

To compare the measurement of glucose uptake in primary invasive breast cancer using simultaneous, time-of-flight breast PET/MRI with prone time-of-flight PET/CT.

Materials and Methods

In this prospective study, women with biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer undergoing preoperative breast MRI from 2016 to 2018 were eligible. Participants who had fasted underwent prone PET/CT of the breasts approximately 60 minutes after injection of 370 MBq (10 mCi) fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) followed by prone PET/MRI using standard clinical breast MRI sequences performed simultaneously with PET acquisition. Volumes of interest were drawn for tumors and contralateral normal breast fibroglandular tissue to calculate standardized uptake values (SUVs). Spearman correlation, Wilcoxon signed ranked test, Mann-Whitney test, and Bland-Altman analyses were performed.

Results

Twenty-three women (mean age, 50 years; range, 33-70 years) were included. Correlation between tumor uptake values measured with PET/MRI and PET/CT was strong (r s = 0.95-0.98). No difference existed between modalities for tumor maximum SUV (SUVmax) normalized to normal breast tissue SUVmean (normSUVmax) (P = .58). The least amount of measurement bias was observed with normSUVmax, +3.86% (95% limits of agreement: -28.92, +36.64).

Conclusion

These results demonstrate measurement agreement between PET/CT, the current reference standard for tumor glucose uptake quantification, and simultaneous time-of-flight breast 18F-FDG PET/MRI.Keywords: Breast, Comparative Studies, PET/CT, PET/MR Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2021See also the commentary by Mankoff and Surti in this issue.

Convolutional neural networks for improving image quality with noisy PET data

GOAL

PET is a relatively noisy process compared to other imaging modalities, and sparsity of acquisition data leads to noise in the images. Recent work has focused on machine learning techniques to improve PET images, and this study investigates a deep learning approach to improve the quality of reconstructed image volumes through denoising by a 3D convolution neural network. Potential improvements were evaluated within a clinical context by physician performance in a reading task.

METHODS

A wide range of controlled noise levels was emulated from a set of chest PET data in patients with lung cancer, and a convolutional neural network was trained to denoise the reconstructed images using the full-count reconstructions as the ground truth. The benefits, over conventional Gaussian smoothing, were quantified across all noise levels by observer performance in an image ranking and lesion detection task.

RESULTS

The CNN-denoised images were generally ranked by the physicians equal to or better than the Gaussian-smoothed images for all count levels, with the largest effects observed in the lowest-count image sets. For the CNN-denoised images, overall lesion contrast recovery was 60% and 90% at the 1 and 20 million count levels, respectively. Notwithstanding the reduced lesion contrast recovery in noisy data, the CNN-denoised images also yielded better lesion detectability in low count levels. For example, at 1 million true counts, the average true positive detection rate was around 40% for the CNN-denoised images and 30% for the smoothed images.

CONCLUSION

Significant improvements were found for CNN-denoising for very noisy images, and to some degree for all noise levels. The technique presented here offered however limited benefit for detection performance for images at the count levels routinely encountered in the clinic.

Head-to-head comparison between digital and analog PET of human and phantom images when optimized for maximizing the signal-to-noise ratio from small lesions

Background

Routine PET exams are increasingly performed with reduced injected activities, leading to the use of different image reconstruction parameters than the NEMA parameters, in order to prevent from any deleterious decrease in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and thus, in lesion detectability. This study aimed to provide a global head-to-head comparison between digital (Vereos, Philips®) and analog (Ingenuity TF, Philips®) PET cameras of the trade-off between SNR and contrast through a wide-ranging number of reconstruction iterations, and with a further reconstruction optimization based on the SNR of small lesions.

Methods

Image quality parameters were compared between the two cameras on human and phantom images for a number of OSEM reconstruction iterations ranging from 1 to 10, the number of subsets being fixed at 10, and with the further identification of reconstruction parameters maximizing the SNR of spheres and adenopathies nearing 10 mm in diameter. These reconstructions were additionally obtained with and without time-of-flight (TOF) information (TOF and noTOF images, respectively) for further comparisons.

Results

On both human and phantom TOF images, the compromise between SNR and contrast was consistently more advantageous for digital than analog PET, with the difference being particularly pronounced for the lowest numbers of iterations and the smallest spheres. SNR was maximized with 1 and 2 OSEM iterations for the TOF images from digital and analog PET, respectively, whereas 4 OSEM iterations were required for the corresponding noTOF images from both cameras. On the TOF images obtained with this SNR optimization, digital PET exhibited a 37% to 44% higher SNR as compared with analog PET, depending on sphere size. These relative differences were however much lower for the noTOF images optimized for SNR (− 4 to + 18%), as well as for images reconstructed according to NEMA standards (− 4 to + 12%).

Conclusion

SNR may be dramatically higher for digital PET than for analog PET, especially when optimized for small lesions. This superiority is mostly attributable to enhanced TOF resolution and is significantly underestimated in NEMA-based analyses.

68Ga-PSMA-11 dose reduction for dedicated pelvic imaging with simultaneous PET/MR using TOF BSREM reconstructions

OBJECTIVES

When increasing the PET acquisition time to match the longer MRI protocol in simultaneous PET/MR, the injected PET tracer dose can possibly be lowered to reduce radiation exposure. Moreover, applying new commercially available time-of-flight (TOF) block sequential regularized expectation maximization (BSREM)-based reconstruction algorithms could allow for further dose reductions. The purpose of this study was to find the minimal dose of the tracer targeting the prostate specific membrane antigen (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11) for a dedicated 15-min pelvic PET/MR scan that still matches the image quality of a reference 3-min scan at 100% (150 MBq) dose.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, 25 patients were included. PET emission datasets were edited to simulate stepwise reductions of injected tracer dose. Reference TOF ordered subset expectation maximum (OSEM) and new TOF BSREM reconstructions were performed and differences in the resulting PET images were visually and quantitatively assessed.

RESULTS

Visually, TOF BSREM reconstructions with relatively high regularization parameter (β) values are preferred. Quantitatively, however, high β-values result in lower lesion maximum standardized uptake values (SUV_max) compared to the reference. A β-value of 550 was considered the optimal compromise for the lowest possible 10% dose reconstructions, resulting in comparable visual assessment and lesion SUV_max.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the injected ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 tracer dose for a standard 3-min PET scan can be reduced to approximately 10% (15 MBq) when the PET acquisition time is matched to the 15-min pelvic MRI protocol, and when reconstructed with TOF BSREM using β = 550. This decreases the effective dose from 3.54 to 0.35 mSv.

KEY POINTS

• Low-dose dedicated pelvic⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR reduces radiation exposure for patients. • Retrospective study investigating the minimal dose needed for adequate image quality for 15-min PET frames over the pelvis showed using quantitative and qualitative analysis that a substantial dose reduction is possible without significant loss of image quality when using the TOF BSREM reconstruction algorithm. • With the introduction of low-dose pelvic⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MR, new potential applications of⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET for local staging or investigation of equivocal MRI findings could become applicable, even for patients without confirmed prostate cancer.

Reduction of the fluorine-18-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose dose for clinically dedicated breast positron emission tomography

PURPOSE

To determine the clinically acceptable level of reduction in the injected fluorine-18 (¹⁸F)-labeled fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) dose in dedicated breast positron emission tomography (dbPET).

METHODS

A breast phantom with four spheres exhibiting various diameters (5, 7.5, 10, and 16 mm), a background ¹⁸F-FDG radioactivity of 2.28 kBq/mL, and a sphere-to-background radioactivity ratio of 8:1 was used. True dose-reduced dbPET images were obtained by data acquisition for 20 min in list mode at multiple time points over 7 h of radioactive decay. Simulated dose-reduced images were generated by reconstruction with a portion of the list mode acquisition data. True and simulated dose-reduced images were visually and quantitatively compared. On the basis of the phantom study, dbPET images for 32 breasts of 28 women with abnormal uptake were generated after simulated reduction of the injected ¹⁸F-FDG doses; these images were compared with those acquired using current clinical doses.

RESULTS

There were no qualitative differences between true and simulated dose-reduced phantom images. The phantom study revealed that the minimal required dose was 12.5% for the detection of 5-mm spheres and 25% for precise semi-quantification of FDG in the spheres. The 7-min reconstruction with a 100% dose was defined as the reference for the clinical study. The image quality and lesion conspicuity were clinically acceptable for the 25% dose images. Lesion detectability on the 12.5% dose images was maintained despite image quality degradation.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, 25% of the standard ¹⁸F-FDG dose for dbPET can provide a clinically acceptable image quality, while 12.5% of the standard dose results in acceptable quality in terms of lesion detection when lesions are located at a sufficient distance from the edge of the dbPET detector.

Summary of the First ISMRM-SNMMI Workshop on PET/MRI: Applications and Limitations

Since the introduction of simultaneous PET/MRI in 2011, there have been significant advancements. In this review, we highlight several technical advancements that have been made primarily in attenuation and motion correction and discuss the status of multiple clinical applications using PET/MRI. This review is based on the experience at the first PET/MRI conference cosponsored by the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.