1
|
Prabhu RS, Russek R, McBride JE, Price KB, Garland DN, Franklin E, McHaffie DR, Ward MC, Rowland CL, Huffstetler CE, Hicks AS. Unplanned Emergency Department or Inpatient Acute Care Within 1 Week After Administration of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy: Frequency of Occurrence and Standard Operating Procedures for Radioprotection in These Situations. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024:S1879-8500(24)00163-2. [PMID: 39053602 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.07.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2024] [Revised: 07/10/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a rapidly developing treatment modality. These treatments are indicated for patients who are either heavily pretreated and/or may have neurohormonal active disease, increasing risk of acute adverse effects and the need for unplanned acute care. The goals of this report were to characterize the frequency of unplanned acute care utilization after PRRT infusion and to detail a comprehensive standard operating procedure (SOP) for radioprotection during unplanned post-PRRT acute care. The records of patients treated with PRRT were reviewed. The event of interest was emergency department (ED) utilization and/or inpatient admission within 7 days of PRRT infusion. A multidisciplinary group developed a radioprotection SOP for all phases of unplanned acute care including the clinical infusion space, emergency medical services (EMS) transport to the ED, within the ED, and on the inpatient floor. A total of 232 patients received 814 infusions of PRRT, with 134 (58%) receiving Lutathera and 98 (42%) receiving Pluvicto. Nineteen patients received unplanned acute care at an ED within 7 days of PRRT infusion (8% of patients, 2% of infusions), of which 10 received Lutathera (8% of patients, 2% of infusions). Two patients (2% of patients, 0.5% of infusions) experienced carcinoid crises within 24 hours of Lutathera infusion. The median and average interval between infusion and ED visit was 0.5 days and 1.3 days, respectively. Nine patients received Pluvicto (9% of patients, 3% of infusions). The median and average interval between infusion and ED visit was 4 days and 4.7 days, respectively. Emergency room utilization and/or inpatient admission after PRRT administration are relatively infrequent events, but not unexpected. Centers that administer PRRT should have a comprehensive SOP in place to effectively care for radioactive patient emergencies while maximizing medical staff protection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshan S Prabhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group (SERO), Charlotte, NC, USA.
| | - Rachel Russek
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - James E McBride
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Karen B Price
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Danielle N Garland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth Franklin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Derek R McHaffie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group (SERO), Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Matthew C Ward
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA; Southeast Radiation Oncology Group (SERO), Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Chelsea L Rowland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | | | - Amy S Hicks
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Atrium Health Levine Cancer, Charlotte, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ulaner GA, VanderMolen LA, Li G, Ferreira D. Dotatate PET/CT and 225Ac-Dotatate Therapy for Somatostatin Receptor-expressing Metastatic Breast Cancer. Radiology 2024; 312:e233408. [PMID: 39078299 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.233408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Background Somatostatin receptors, and specifically somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2), have primarily been associated with neuroendocrine tumors and have revolutionized the imaging and therapy of patients with these tumors. SSTR2 is expressed on other tumors at lower prevalence. Purpose To evaluate the potential of SSTR2-targeted imaging and therapy in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods In a preclinical experiment, SSTR2 expression was assessed in tissue microarrays of breast cancer samples using H-score analysis. H-scores higher than 50 (0-300 scale) were considered positive. Then, a prospective phase 2 clinical trial of SSTR2-targeted tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid octreotate (Dotatate) PET/CT was performed in participants with biopsy-proven estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer from January to August 2023. A positive Dotatate PET/CT scan was defined as tumors with a Krenning score of 3 (avidity greater than liver) or 4 (avidity greater than spleen). The proportion of positive scans and the 95% CI were calculated. One participant with metastatic ER-positive breast cancer and a Krenning 4 Dotatate PET/CT result underwent treatment with SSTR2-targeted actinium 225 (225Ac) Dotatate. Results Preclinical microarrays demonstrated that 63 of 123 ER-positive breast cancer tissue samples (51% [95% CI: 42, 60]) but only 22 of 121 ER-negative breast cancer tissue samples (18% [95% CI: 12, 26]) were enriched for SSTR2 (P < .001). Thirty female participants (mean age, 66 years ± 15) with metastatic ER-positive breast cancer were accrued to the phase 2 SSTR2-targeted imaging trial and underwent Dotatate PET/CT. Dotatate PET/CT demonstrated that nine of 30 participants (30% [95% CI: 15, 49]) had tumors with Krenning scores of 3 or 4, indicating strong SSTR2 expression. SSTR2-targeted therapy with alpha-emitting 225Ac-Dotatate resulted in a near complete response in a heavily pretreated participant with metastatic ER-positive breast cancer and a Krenning 4 Dotatate PET result. Conclusion Molecular imaging targeting SSTR2 and radioligand therapy with SSTR2-targeted 225Ac-Dotatate enables a new therapeutic option for patients with metastatic breast cancer. Clinical trial registration no. NCT05880394 © RSNA, 2024 See also the editorial by Lin and Choyke in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gary A Ulaner
- From the Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, 16105 Sand Canyon Ave, Irvine, CA 92618 (G.A.U.); Department of Radiology and Translational Genomics (G.A.U.) and Department of Medicine (L.A.V.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif; and RayzeBio, San Diego, CA (G.L., D.F.)
| | - Louis A VanderMolen
- From the Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, 16105 Sand Canyon Ave, Irvine, CA 92618 (G.A.U.); Department of Radiology and Translational Genomics (G.A.U.) and Department of Medicine (L.A.V.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif; and RayzeBio, San Diego, CA (G.L., D.F.)
| | - Gary Li
- From the Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, 16105 Sand Canyon Ave, Irvine, CA 92618 (G.A.U.); Department of Radiology and Translational Genomics (G.A.U.) and Department of Medicine (L.A.V.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif; and RayzeBio, San Diego, CA (G.L., D.F.)
| | - Denis Ferreira
- From the Department of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Hoag Family Cancer Institute, 16105 Sand Canyon Ave, Irvine, CA 92618 (G.A.U.); Department of Radiology and Translational Genomics (G.A.U.) and Department of Medicine (L.A.V.), University of Southern California, Los Angeles, Calif; and RayzeBio, San Diego, CA (G.L., D.F.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Albert NL, Preusser M, Traub-Weidinger T, Tolboom N, Law I, Palmer JD, Guedj E, Furtner J, Fraioli F, Huang RY, Johnson DR, Deroose CM, Herrmann K, Vogelbaum M, Chang S, Tonn JC, Weller M, Wen PY, van den Bent MJ, Verger A, Ivanidze J, Galldiks N. Joint EANM/EANO/RANO/SNMMI practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands: version 1.0. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2024:10.1007/s00259-024-06783-x. [PMID: 38898354 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06783-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 05/30/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To provide practice guideline/procedure standards for diagnostics and therapy (theranostics) of meningiomas using radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands. METHODS This joint practice guideline/procedure standard was collaboratively developed by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (SNMMI), the European Association of Neurooncology (EANO), and the PET task force of the Response Assessment in Neurooncology Working Group (PET/RANO). RESULTS Positron emission tomography (PET) using somatostatin receptor (SSTR) ligands can detect meningioma tissue with high sensitivity and specificity and may provide clinically relevant information beyond that obtained from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) imaging alone. SSTR-directed PET imaging can be particularly useful for differential diagnosis, delineation of meningioma extent, detection of osseous involvement, and the differentiation between posttherapeutic scar tissue and tumour recurrence. Moreover, SSTR-peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is an emerging investigational treatment approach for meningioma. CONCLUSION These practice guidelines will define procedure standards for the application of PET imaging in patients with meningiomas and related SSTR-targeted PRRTs in routine practice and clinical trials and will help to harmonize data acquisition and interpretation across centers, facilitate comparability of studies, and to collect larger databases. The current document provides additional information to the evidence-based recommendations from the PET/RANO Working Group regarding the utilization of PET imaging in meningiomas Galldiks (Neuro Oncol. 2017;19(12):1576-87). The information provided should be considered in the context of local conditions and regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.
| | - Matthias Preusser
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Tatjana Traub-Weidinger
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Nuclear Medicine, Clinic Donaustadt, Vienna Health Care Group, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nelleke Tolboom
- Princess Máxima Centre for Paediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Division Imaging & Oncology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ian Law
- Department of Clinical Physiology and Nuclear Medicine, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Joshua D Palmer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Eric Guedj
- Institut Fresnel, Nuclear Medicine Department, APHM, CNRS, Timone Hospital, CERIMED, Aix Marseille Univ, Marseille, France
| | - Julia Furtner
- Research Center for Medical Image Analysis and Artificial Intelligence (MIAAI), Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Danube Private University, 3500, Krems, Austria
| | - Francesco Fraioli
- Institute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Raymond Y Huang
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Christophe M Deroose
- Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Department of Imaging and Pathology, University Hospitals Leuven, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) - University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | | | - Susan Chang
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Joerg-Christian Tonn
- Department of Neurosurgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Michael Weller
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital and University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Patrick Y Wen
- Center for Neuro-Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Martin J van den Bent
- Department of Neurology, Brain Tumor Center at Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Antoine Verger
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Nancyclotep Imaging Platform, CHRU Nancy and IADI INSERM UMR 1254, Université de Lorraine, Nancy, France
| | - Jana Ivanidze
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Norbert Galldiks
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3), Research Center Juelich, Juelich, Germany
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Universities of Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, and Duesseldorf, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ebner R, Lohse A, Fabritius MP, Rübenthaler J, Wängler C, Wängler B, Schirrmacher R, Völter F, Schmid HP, Unterrainer LM, Öcal O, Hinterberger A, Spitzweg C, Auernhammer CJ, Geyer T, Ricke J, Bartenstein P, Holzgreve A, Grawe F. Validation of the standardization framework SSTR-RADS 1.0 for neuroendocrine tumors using the novel SSTR‑targeting peptide [ 18F]SiTATE. Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10788-3. [PMID: 38769164 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10788-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Somatostatin receptor positron emission tomography/computed tomography (SSTR-PET/CT) using [68Ga]-labeled tracers is a widely used imaging modality for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Recently, [18F]SiTATE, a SiFAlin tagged [Tyr3]-octreotate (TATE) PET tracer, has shown great potential due to favorable clinical characteristics. We aimed to evaluate the reproducibility of Somatostatin Receptor-Reporting and Data System 1.0 (SSTR-RADS 1.0) for structured interpretation and treatment planning of NET using [18F]SiTATE. METHODS Four readers assessed [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT of 95 patients according to the SSTR-RADS 1.0 criteria at two different time points. Each reader evaluated up to five target lesions per scan. The overall scan score and the decision on peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) were considered. Inter- and intra-reader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS The ICC analysis on the inter-reader agreement using SSTR-RADS 1.0 for identical target lesions (ICC ≥ 85%), overall scan score (ICC ≥ 90%), and the decision to recommend PRRT (ICC ≥ 85%) showed excellent agreement. However, significant differences were observed in recommending PRRT among experienced readers (ER) (p = 0.020) and inexperienced readers (IR) (p = 0.004). Compartment-based analysis demonstrated good to excellent inter-reader agreement for most organs (ICC ≥ 74%), except for lymph nodes (ICC ≥ 53%). CONCLUSION SSTR-RADS 1.0 represents a highly reproducible and consistent framework system for stratifying SSTR-targeted PET/CT scans, even using the novel SSTR-ligand [18F]SiTATE. Some inter-reader variability was observed regarding the evaluation of uptake intensity prior to PRRT as well as compartment scoring of lymph nodes, indicating that those categories require special attention during further clinical validation and might be refined in a future SSTR-RADS version 1.1. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a consistent framework for categorizing somatostatin receptor-targeted PET/CT scans when using [18F]SiTATE. The framework serves as a valuable tool for facilitating and improving the management of patients with NET. KEY POINTS SSTR-RADS 1.0 is a valuable tool for managing patients with NET. SSTR-RADS 1.0 categorizes patients with showing strong agreement across diverse reader expertise. As an alternative to [68Ga]-labeled PET/CT in neuroendocrine tumor imaging, SSTR-RADS 1.0 reliably classifies [18F]SiTATE-PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Ebner
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - A Lohse
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M P Fabritius
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Rübenthaler
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - B Wängler
- Biomedical Chemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
- Molecular Imaging and Radiochemistry, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim of Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - R Schirrmacher
- Department of Oncology, Division of Oncological Imaging, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - F Völter
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H P Schmid
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - L M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - O Öcal
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Hinterberger
- DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Spitzweg
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C J Auernhammer
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Medicine IV, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - T Geyer
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - J Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Interdisciplinary Center of Neuroendocrine Tumors of the GastroEnteroPancreatic System (GEPNET-KUM, ENETS certified Center of Excellence), LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - A Holzgreve
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Grawe
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- DKFZ Hector Cancer Institute at the University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Clinical Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mallak N, O'Brien SR, Pryma DA, Mittra E. Theranostics in Neuroendocrine Tumors. Cancer J 2024; 30:185-193. [PMID: 38753753 DOI: 10.1097/ppo.0000000000000723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/18/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are rare tumors that develop from cells of the neuroendocrine system and can originate in multiple organs and tissues such as the bowels, pancreas, adrenal glands, ganglia, thyroid, and lungs. This review will focus on gastroenteropancreatic NETs (more commonly called NETs) characterized by frequent somatostatin receptor (SSTR) overexpression and pheochromocytomas/paragangliomas (PPGLs), which typically overexpress norepinephrine transporter. Advancements in SSTR-targeted imaging and treatment have revolutionized the management of patients with NETs. This comprehensive review delves into the current practice, discussing the use of the various Food and Drug Administration-approved SSTR-agonist positron emission tomography tracers and the predictive imaging biomarkers, and elaborating on 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy including the evolving areas of posttherapy imaging practices and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy retreatment. SSTR-targeted imaging and therapy can also be used in patients with PPGL; however, this patient population has demonstrated the best outcomes from norepinephrine transporter-targeted therapy with 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine. Metaiodobenzylguanidine theranostics for PPGL will be discussed, noting that in 2024 it became commercially unavailable in the United States. Therefore, the use and reported success of SSTR theranostics for PPGL will also be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadine Mallak
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR
| | - Sophia R O'Brien
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Daniel A Pryma
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Erik Mittra
- From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health & Sciences University, Portland, OR
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Donzé C, Rubira L, Santoro L, Viarasakd M, Kotzki PO, Deshayes E, Fersing C. 177Lu-Dotatate administration using an infusion pump or a peristaltic pump: comparison of two methods. Eur J Hosp Pharm 2024; 31:207-211. [PMID: 36100369 DOI: 10.1136/ejhpharm-2022-003489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES 177Lu-oxodotreotide (Lutathera) is an intravenous peptide receptor radionuclide therapy to treat unresectable metastatic digestive neuroendocrine tumours. The recommended method for Lutathera administration is gravity infusion; however, other appropriate and safe techniques are possible. This work compares two infusion methods from a medico-economic, radiation protection, efficiency and practicality point of view. METHODS Two infusion methods were studied, either involving a volumetric infusion pump (method 1) or a peristaltic pump (method 2). For each method, the mean residual activity per vial and the mean injection time were compared. Occupational radiation exposure was measured. The cost of initial equipment and consumables for one administration was determined. Feedback from operators and past incidents during injections were collected through a survey. RESULTS Three operators performed 219 Lutathera injections over 70 months: 60.7% (133) with method 1 and 39.3% (86) with method 2. After infusion, the mean residual activity in vial was 124.3±16.9 MBq with method 1 and 80.9±19.3 MBq with method 2 (34.9% decrease). The average administration time was 41±7.2 min with method 1 and 39±8.5 min with method 2. Occupational exposures obtained with both methods were very low and quite similar. Method 1 required an initial investment of 1165.8 US$ plus 4.0 US$ of supplies for each administration. Initial investment for method 2 was comparable (1261.4 US$) but supplies cost per administration was higher (12.5 US$). Two major incidents were recorded with method 1 and none with method 2. From operators' experience, method 2 felt safer and more suitable. CONCLUSIONS Method 2 appeared to be convenient and secure, despite a higher cost per injection. It could also be applied to new radioligand therapies such as 177Lu-PSMA or 225Ac-Dotatate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Donzé
- Nuclear medicine department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Léa Rubira
- Nuclear medicine department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Lore Santoro
- Nuclear medicine department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Malissone Viarasakd
- Nuclear medicine department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Olivier Kotzki
- Nuclear medicine department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Univ. Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Emmanuel Deshayes
- Nuclear medicine department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- Institut de Recherche en Cancérologie de Montpellier (IRCM), INSERM U1194, Univ. Montpellier, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Montpellier, France
| | - Cyril Fersing
- Nuclear medicine department, Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier (ICM), Univ. Montpellier, Montpellier, France
- IBMM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, ENSCM, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kunos CA, Martin ME, Georgiou MF, Kuker RA, Chauhan A. Leveraging Programmatic Collaboration for a Radiopharmaceutical Clinic. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1396. [PMID: 38611074 PMCID: PMC11011188 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16071396] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Radiation oncologists, radiopharmacists, nuclear medicine physicians, and medical oncologists have seen a renewed clinical interest in radiopharmaceuticals for the curative or the palliative treatment of cancer. To allow for the discovery and the clinical advancement of targeted radiopharmaceuticals, these stakeholders have reformed their trial efforts and remodeled their facilities to accommodate the obligations of a program centered upon radioactive investigational drug products. Now considered informally as drugs and not beam radiotherapy, radiopharmaceuticals can be more easily studied in the traditional clinical trial enterprise ranging from phase 0-I to phase III studies. Resources and physical facilities allocated to radiopharmaceuticals have brought forth new logistics and patient experience for safe and satisfactory drug delivery. The clinical use of theranostic agents-that is, diagnostic and therapeutic radionuclide pairs-has accelerated radiopharmaceutical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles A. Kunos
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1475 NW 12th Avenue, Suite 1500, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Molly E. Martin
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Iowa Health Care, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA;
| | - Michalis F. Georgiou
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Russ A. Kuker
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Aman Chauhan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hotta M, Sonni I, Thin P, Nguyen K, Gardner L, Ciuca L, Hayrapetian A, Lewis M, Lubin D, Allen-Auerbach M. Visual and whole-body quantitative analyses of 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT for prognosis of outcome after PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE. Ann Nucl Med 2024; 38:296-304. [PMID: 38252228 DOI: 10.1007/s12149-023-01899-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Somatostatin receptors (SSTR) represent an ideal target for nuclear theranostics applications in neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Studies suggest that high uptake on SSTR-PET is associated with response to SSTR peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of baseline whole-body (WB) 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT (SSTR-PET) quantitative parameters, and the presence of NET lesions without uptake on SSTR-PET, as outcome prognosticator in patients with NET treated with PRRT. METHODS Patients with NET who underwent at least 4 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT cycles between 07/2016 and 03/2021 were included in this retrospective analysis if they fulfilled the following inclusion criteria: SSTR-PET within 6 months of 1st PRRT cycle, follow-up CT and/or MRI performed > 6 months after the 4th cycle of PRRT. The SSTR-PET analysis consisted of a visual and a quantitative analysis done independently by two board-certified physicians. The visual analysis assessed the presence of NET lesions visible on the SSTR-PET co-registered CT. The quantitative analysis consisted in contouring all SSTR-avid lesions on SSTR-PET and extracting WB quantitative parameters: SUVmean (WB-SUVmean), SUVmax of the lesion with highest uptake (H-SUVmax), and tumor volume (WB-TV). WB-SSTR-PET parameters and the presence of SSTR-PET-negative lesions were correlated to radiologic response (assessed by RECIST 1.1 criteria) and progression-free survival (PFS). Fisher's exact test, Mann-Whitney's U test and Kaplan-Meier curves with Cox-regression analysis were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS Forty patients (F/M: 21/19; 34/40 with gastro-entero-pancreatic (GEP) NET, 6/40 with non-GEP NET) were included in the analysis. The median follow-up period after the 4th PRRT cycle was 25.7 months (range 15.2-59.1). Fourteen/40 (35%) patients showed radiologic response (RECIST PR). PFS event was observed in 17/40 (42.5%) patients. Thirteen/40 (32.5%) patients had SSTR-PET-negative lesions at baseline. Higher WB-SUVmean and H-SUVmax were associated with better response (p = 0.015 and 0.005, respectively). The presence of SSTR-PET-negative lesions and lower WB-SUVmean were associated with shorter PFS (p = 0.026 and 0.008, respectively). CONCLUSION Visual and quantitative analyses of baseline SSTR-PET can yield valuable information to prognosticate outcomes after 177Lu-DOTATATE PRRT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatoshi Hotta
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Ida Sonni
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University Magna Graecia, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Pan Thin
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kathleen Nguyen
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Linda Gardner
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Liliana Ciuca
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Artineh Hayrapetian
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology at, University of South Alabama Hospital, Mobile, South AL, USA
| | - Meredith Lewis
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology at Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA
| | - David Lubin
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
- Department of Radiology, Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, SUNY Upstate, Syracuse, NY, USA
| | - Martin Allen-Auerbach
- Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Strosberg JR, Al-Toubah T, El-Haddad G, Reidy Lagunes D, Bodei L. Sequencing of Somatostatin-Receptor-Based Therapies in Neuroendocrine Tumor Patients. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:340-348. [PMID: 38238038 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.265706] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Most well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) express high levels of somatostatin receptors, particularly subtypes 2 and 5. Somatostatin analogs (SSAs) bind to somatostatin receptors and are used for palliation of hormonal syndromes and control of tumor growth. The long-acting SSAs octreotide long-acting release and lanreotide are commonly used in the first-line metastatic setting because of their tolerable side effect profile. Radiolabeled SSAs are used both for imaging and for treatment of NETs. 177Lu-DOTATATE is a β-emitting radiolabeled SSA that has been proven to significantly improve progression-free survival among patients with progressive midgut NETs and is approved for treatment of metastatic gastroenteropancreatic NETs. A key question in management of patients with gastroenteropancreatic and lung NETs is the sequencing of 177Lu-DOTATATE in relation to other systemic treatments (such as everolimus) or liver-directed therapies. This question is particularly complicated given the heterogeneity of NETs and the near absence of randomized trials comparing active treatment options. This state-of-the-art review examines the evidence supporting use of somatostatin-receptor-targeted treatments within the larger landscape of NET therapy and offers insights regarding optimal patient selection, assessment of benefit versus risk, and treatment sequencing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan R Strosberg
- Department of GI Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida;
| | - Taymeyah Al-Toubah
- Department of GI Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- Department of Radiology, Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Diane Reidy Lagunes
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and
| | - Lisa Bodei
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yadav S, Lawhn-Heath C, Paciorek A, Lindsay S, Mirro R, Bergsland EK, Hope TA. The Impact of Posttreatment Imaging in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J Nucl Med 2024; 65:409-415. [PMID: 38428966 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Posttreatment imaging of γ-emissions after peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be used to perform quantitative dosimetry as well as assessment response using qualitative measures. We aimed to assess the impact of qualitative posttreatment imaging on the management of patients undergoing PRRT. Methods: In this retrospective study, we evaluated 100 patients with advanced well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors undergoing PRRT, who had posttreatment SPECT/CT imaging at 24 h. First, we evaluated the qualitative assessment of response at each cycle. Then using a chart review, we determined the impact on management from the posttreatment imaging. The changes in management were categorized as major or minor, and the cycles at which these changes occurred were noted. Additionally, tumor grade was also evaluated. Results: Of the 100 sequential patients reviewed, most (80% after cycle 2, 79% after cycle 3, and 73% after cycle 4) showed qualitatively stable disease during PRRT. Management changes were observed in 27% (n = 27) of patients; 78% of those (n = 21) were major, and 30% (n = 9) were minor. Most treatment changes occurred after cycle 2 (33% major, 67% minor) and cycle 3 (62% major, 33% minor). Higher tumor grade correlated with increased rate of changes in management (P = 0.006). Conclusion: In this retrospective study, qualitative analysis of posttreatment SPECT/CT imaging informed changes in management in 27% of patients. Patients with higher-grade tumors had a higher rate of change in management, and most of the management changes occurred after cycles 2 and 3. Incorporating posttreatment imaging into standard PRRT workflows could potentially enhance patient management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Surekha Yadav
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Courtney Lawhn-Heath
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Alan Paciorek
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Sheila Lindsay
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Rebecca Mirro
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Emily K Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California;
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California; and
- Department of Radiology, San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
George SC, Tolakanahalli R, Aguirre S, Kim TP, Samuel EJJ, Mishra V. A single-institution experience with 177Lu RPT workflow improvements and qualifying the SPECT/CT imaging for dosimetry. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1331266. [PMID: 38469241 PMCID: PMC10925616 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1331266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/13/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Implementing any radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) program requires a comprehensive review of system readiness, appropriate workflows, and training to ensure safe and efficient treatment delivery. A quantitative assessment of the dose delivered to targets and organs at risk (OAR) using RPT is possible by correlating the absorbed doses with the delivered radioactivity. Integrating dosimetry into an established RPT program demands a thorough analysis of the necessary components and system fine-tuning. This study aims to report an optimized workflow for molecular radiation therapy using 177Lu with a primary focus on integrating patient-specific dosimetry into an established radiopharmaceutical program in a radiation oncology setting. Materials and methods We comprehensively reviewed using the Plan-Do-Check-Act (PDCA) cycle, including efficacy and accuracy of delivery and all aspects of radiation safety of the RPT program. The GE Discovery SPECT/CT 670DR™ system was calibrated per MIM protocol for dose calculation on MIM SurePlan™ MRT software. Jaszcak Phantom with 15-20 mCi of 177Lu DOTATATE with 2.5 µM EDTA solution was used, with the main energy window defined as 208 keV ±10% (187.6 to 229.2 keV); the upper scatter energy window was set to 240 keV ±5% (228 to 252 keV), while the lower scatter energy window was 177.8 keV ±5% (168.9 to 186.7 keV). Volumetric quality control tests and adjustments were performed to ensure the correct alignment of the table, NM, and CT gantry on SPECT/CT. A comprehensive end-to-end (E2E) test was performed to ensure workflow, functionality, and quantitative dose accuracy. Results Workflow improvements and checklists are presented after systematically analyzing over 400 administrations of 177Lu-based RPT. Injected activity to each sphere in the NEMA Phantom scan was quantified, and the MIM Sureplan MRT reconstruction images calculated activities within ±12% of the injected activity. Image alignment tests on the SPECT/CT showed a discrepancy of more than the maximum tolerance of 2.2 mm on any individual axis. As a result of servicing the machine and updating the VQC and COR corrections, the hybrid imaging system was adjusted to achieve an accuracy of <1 mm in all directions. Conclusion Workflows and checklists, after analysis of system readiness and adequate training for staff and patients, are presented. Hardware and software components for patient-specific dosimetry are presented with a focus on hybrid image registration and correcting any errors that affect dosimetric quantification calculation. Moreover, this manuscript briefly overviews the necessary quality assurance requirements for converting diagnostic images into dosimetry measurement tools and integrating dosimetry for RPT based on 177Lu.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siju C. George
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
- Department of Physics, School of Advanced Sciences, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, India
| | - Ranjini Tolakanahalli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Santiago Aguirre
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
| | - Taehyung Peter Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
| | | | - Vivek Mishra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health, Miami, FL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ha S, Kim YI, Oh JS, Yoo C, Ryoo BY, Ryu JS. Prediction of [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy response using the absorbed dose estimated from [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour. EJNMMI Phys 2024; 11:14. [PMID: 38315270 PMCID: PMC10844176 DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00620-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2024] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE has shown efficacy in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours (NETs). Personalised dosimetry is crucial to optimise treatment outcomes and minimise adverse events. In this study, we investigated the correlation between the tumour-absorbed dose (TAD) estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and the therapeutic response. METHOD A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients with advanced well-differentiated NETs grades 1-3 who underwent PRRT and exhibited greater uptake than liver on pre-therapeutic [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TOC PET/CT. Target lesions were selected based on the RECIST 1.1 and PERCIST 1.0 criteria using [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT and pre-therapeutic contrast-enhanced CT scans. For anatomical image analysis, the sum of the longest diameter (SLD) of the target lesions was measured using the RECIST 1.1 criteria for patient-based analysis and the longest diameter (LD) of the target lesion using the RECIST-L criteria for lesion-based analysis. Standardised uptake values (SUVs) were measured on SPECT/CT images, and TADs were calculated based on the SUVs. Dosimetry was performed using a single SPECT/CT imaging time point at day 4-5 post-therapy. Statistical analyses were conducted to investigate correlations and determine the target lesion responses. RESULTS Twenty patients with primary tumour sites and hepatic metastases were included. Fifty-five target lesions, predominantly located in the pancreas and liver, were analysed. The cumulative TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.299-0.301, p = 0.025-0.027), but not the cycle 1 SUV (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.198-0.206, p = 0.131-0.147) or cycle 1 TAD (lesion-based analysis: r = 0.209-0.217, p = 0.112-0.126), exhibited a significant correlation with the change in LD of the target lesion. Binary logistic regression analysis identified the significance of the cumulative TAD in predicting disease control according to the RECIST-L criteria (odds ratio = 1.031-1.051, p = 0.024-0.026). CONCLUSIONS The cumulative TAD estimated from [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE SPECT/CT revealed a significant correlation with change in LD, which was significantly higher for the cumulative TAD than for the cycle 1 SUV or TAD. A higher cumulative TAD was associated with disease control in the target lesion. However, considering the limitations inherent to a confined sample size, careful interpretation of these findings is required. Estimation of the cumulative TAD of [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE therapy could guide the platform towards personalised therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sejin Ha
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Jungsu S Oh
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Baek-Yeol Ryoo
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Sook Ryu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Theranostics Center, Asan Cancer Institute, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wu Z, Shang G, Zhang K, Wang W, Fan M, Lin R. Combined the surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy for predicting overall survival in patients with gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Int J Surg 2024; 110:01279778-990000000-00998. [PMID: 38241384 PMCID: PMC11020034 DOI: 10.1097/js9.0000000000001080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Over the last few decades, the annual global incidence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) has steadily increased. Because of the complex and inconsistent treatment of GEP-NETs, the prognosis of patients with GEP-NETs is still difficult to assess. The study aimed to construct and validate the nomograms included treatment data for prediction overall survival (OS) in GEP-NETs patients. METHODS GEP-NETs patients determined from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-13 registry database (1992-2018) and with additional treatment data from the SEER-18 registry database (1975-2016). In order to select independent prognostic factors that contribute significantly to patient survival and can be included in the nomogram, multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed using the minimum value of Akaike information criterion (AIC) and we analyzed the relationship of variables with OS by calculating hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. In addition, we also comprehensively compared the nomogram using to predict OS with the current 7th American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system. RESULTS From 2004 to 2015, a total of 42,662 patients at diagnosis years with GEP-NETs were determined from the SEER database. The results indicated that the increasing incidence of GEP-NETs per year and the highest incidence is in patients aged 50-54. After removing cases lacking adequate clinicopathologic characteristics, the remaining eligible patients (n=7,564) were randomly divided into training (3,782 patients) and testing sets (3,782 patients). In the univariate analysis, sex, age, race, tumor location, SEER historic stage, pathology type, TNM, stage, surgery, radiation, chemotherapy, and CS tumor size were found to be significantly related to OS. Ultimately, the key factors for predicting OS were determined, involving sex, age, race, tumor location, SEER historic stage, M, N, grade, surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. For internal validation, the C-index of the nomogram used to estimate OS in the training set was 0.816 (0.804-0.828). For external validation, the concordance index (C-index) of the nomogram used to predict OS was 0.822 (0.812-0.832). In the training and testing sets, our nomogram produced minimum AIC values and C-index of OS compared with AJCC stage. Decision curve analysis (DCA) indicated that the nomogram was better than the AJCC staging system because more clinical net benefits were obtained within a wider threshold probability range. CONCLUSION A nomogram combined treatment data may be better discrimination in predicting overall survival than AJCC staging system. We highly recommend to use our nomogram to evaluate individual risks based on different clinical features of GEP-NETs, which can improve the diagnosis and treatment outcomes of GEP-NETs patients and improve their quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zenghong Wu
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | | | | | | | | | - Rong Lin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mihai R, De Crea C, Guerin C, Torresan F, Agcaoglu O, Simescu R, Walz MK. Surgery for advanced adrenal malignant disease: recommendations based on European Society of Endocrine Surgeons consensus meeting. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znad266. [PMID: 38265812 PMCID: PMC10805373 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znad266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Radu Mihai
- Churchill Cancer Centre, Oxford University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Carmela De Crea
- Centro di Ricerca in Chirurgia delle Ghiandole Endocrine e dell’Obesità, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Hospital Fatebenefratelli Isola Tiberina—Gemelli Isola, Rome, Italy
| | - Carole Guerin
- Department of Endocrine and Metabolic Surgery, Aix-Marseille University, Hôpital de La Conception, Marseille, France
| | - Francesca Torresan
- Endocrine Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Orhan Agcaoglu
- Department of General Surgery, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Razvan Simescu
- Department of General and Endocrine Surgery, Medlife-Humanitas Hospital, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Martin K Walz
- Department of Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fazio N, Falconi M, Foglia E, Bartolomei M, Berruti A, D'Onofrio M, Ferone D, Giordano A, Grimaldi F, Milione M, Panzuto F, Santimaria M, Schillaci O, Seregni E, Stasi M, Volante M, Lastoria S. Optimising Radioligand Therapy for Patients with Gastro-Entero-Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumours: Expert Opinion from an Italian Multidisciplinary Group. Adv Ther 2024; 41:113-129. [PMID: 37987917 PMCID: PMC10796590 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-023-02714-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Radioligand therapy (RLT) with lutetium (177Lu) oxodotreotide is an approved therapy in combination with somatostatin analogues (SSAs) for patients with advanced, well-differentiated G1-G2, gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs) that progress on SSAs. We conducted a series of round table meetings throughout Italy to identify issues related to RLT delivery to patients with GEP-NETs. Four key issues were identified: (1) the proper definition of tumour progression prior to RLT initiation; (2) the impact of RLT in patients with bone metastases and/or high hepatic tumour burden; (3) the optimal follow-up protocol after RLT; and (4) organisational issues related to RLT use and managerial implications. This article reviews the literature relating to the aforementioned issues and makes recommendations based on available evidence and Italian NET experts' opinions. In particular, the group recommends the development of a diagnostic-therapeutic care pathway (DTCP) for patients undergoing RLT which provides systematic guidance but can still be individualised for each patient's clinical and psychosocial needs. A DTCP may clarify the diagnostic, therapeutic and post-treatment monitoring process, and improve communication and the coordination of care between hub and spoke centres. The DTCP may also contribute to changes in the care process related to the 2013/59/EURATOM Directive and to the definition of costs when planning for future or updated reimbursement of RLT in Italy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Fazio
- Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia (IEO) IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Falconi
- Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Pancreas Translational & Clinical Research Center, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuela Foglia
- School of Industrial Engineering and HD LAB-Carlo Cattaneo-LIUC University, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Mirco Bartolomei
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Alfredo Berruti
- Medical Oncology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
- Department of Medical & Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences & Public Health, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Mirko D'Onofrio
- Radiology, GB Rossi University Hospital, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Diego Ferone
- Endocrinology, Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), University of Genova and Endocrinology Clinic, IRCCS, Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Giordano
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Section of Nuclear Medicine, Dipartimento Universitario di Scienze Radiologiche ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Franco Grimaldi
- Endocrinology and Diseases of Metabolism Unit, University Hospital Santa Maria Misericordia, Udine, Italy
| | - Massimo Milione
- Anatomia Patologica 1, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Panzuto
- Department of Medical-Surgical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University and Digestive Disease Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, ENETS Center of Excellence, Rome, Italy
| | - Monica Santimaria
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, S. Bortolo Hospital, AULSS 8 Berica, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Orazio Schillaci
- Department of Biomedicine and Prevention, University Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Ettore Seregni
- Nuclear Medicine Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Stasi
- Medical Physics Department, A.O. Ordine Mauriziano di Torino, Turin, Italy
| | - Marco Volante
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, and Pathology Unit, San Luigi Hospital, Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Secondo Lastoria
- Nuclear Medicine and Therapy with Radionuclides, Cyclotron and Radiopharmacy Units, IRCCS National Cancer Institute, Fondazione Senatore G. Pascale, Via M. Semmola, 80131, Naples, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Sedlack AJH, Meyer C, Mench A, Winters C, Barbon D, Obrzut S, Mallak N. Essentials of Theranostics: A Guide for Physicians and Medical Physicists. Radiographics 2024; 44:e230097. [PMID: 38060426 DOI: 10.1148/rg.230097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical therapies (RPTs) are gaining increased interest with the recent emergence of novel safe and effective theranostic agents, improving outcomes for thousands of patients. The term theranostics refers to the use of diagnostic and therapeutic agents that share the same molecular target; a major step toward precision medicine, especially for oncologic applications. The authors dissect the fundamentals of theranostics in nuclear medicine. First, they explain the radioactive decay schemes and the characteristics of emitted electromagnetic radiation used for imaging, as well as particles used for therapeutic purposes, followed by the interaction of the different types of radiation with tissue. These concepts directly apply to clinical RPTs and play a major role in the efficacy and toxicity profile of different radiopharmaceutical agents. Personalized dosimetry is a powerful tool that can help estimate patient-specific absorbed doses, in tumors as well as normal organs. Dosimetry in RPT is an area of active investigation, as most of what we know about the relationship between delivered dose and tissue damage is extrapolated from external-beam radiation therapy; more research is needed to understand this relationship as it pertains to RPTs. Tumor heterogeneity is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor. Novel molecular imaging agents, often in combination with fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose, are crucial for assessment of target expression in the tumor and potential hypermetabolic disease that may lack the molecular target expression. ©RSNA, 2023 Test Your Knowledge questions are available in the supplemental material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew J H Sedlack
- From the Medical Scientist Training Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L340, Portland, OR 97239-3098 (C.M., A.M., C.W., D.B., S.O., N.M.)
| | - Catherine Meyer
- From the Medical Scientist Training Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L340, Portland, OR 97239-3098 (C.M., A.M., C.W., D.B., S.O., N.M.)
| | - Anna Mench
- From the Medical Scientist Training Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L340, Portland, OR 97239-3098 (C.M., A.M., C.W., D.B., S.O., N.M.)
| | - Celeste Winters
- From the Medical Scientist Training Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L340, Portland, OR 97239-3098 (C.M., A.M., C.W., D.B., S.O., N.M.)
| | - Dennis Barbon
- From the Medical Scientist Training Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L340, Portland, OR 97239-3098 (C.M., A.M., C.W., D.B., S.O., N.M.)
| | - Sebastian Obrzut
- From the Medical Scientist Training Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L340, Portland, OR 97239-3098 (C.M., A.M., C.W., D.B., S.O., N.M.)
| | - Nadine Mallak
- From the Medical Scientist Training Program, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill (A.J.H.S.); and Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Oregon Health and Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, L340, Portland, OR 97239-3098 (C.M., A.M., C.W., D.B., S.O., N.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Shin Y, Moon BH, Ryoo BY, Chang HM, Kim KP, Hong YS, Kim TW, Ryu JS, Kim YI, Yoo C. Efficacy and Safety of Lu-177 DOTATATE Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Patients with Unresectable or Metastatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea. Target Oncol 2024; 19:41-49. [PMID: 38108953 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-023-01022-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lutetium (Lu)-177 peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is one of the standard treatments for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). However, limited Asian representation in the pivotal NETTER-1 trial and a lack of real-world data for Lu-177 PRRT from Asian regions exist. OBJECTIVE This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lu-177 PRRT in Korean patients with advanced NETs. PATIENTS AND METHODS This study analyzed 64 patients treated with Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT at the Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea, between November 2019 and December 2022. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety profile. RESULTS The median age of patients was 55 years. Prior to PRRT, patients received a median of two lines (range 0-6) of systemic therapy. Fifty (78%) patients received the planned four cycles of Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT. The median PFS was 21.7 months (95% confidence interval 16.7-not available) and the ORR was 20%. With a median follow-up of 15.7 months (range 1.0-39.3), the median OS was not reached and the 1-year OS rate was 88%. The median PFS was better in patients with grade 1-2 NETs than in those with grade 3 NET (not reached vs. 14.2 months; hazard ratio 3.15; p = 0.0058). Hematological toxicities were the common adverse events, including grade ≥ 3 anemia (7.8%), neutropenia (10.9%), and thrombocytopenia (9.4%). CONCLUSIONS In Korean patients with advanced NETs, Lu-177 DOTATATE PRRT showed efficacy and safety outcomes, consistent with those in the NETTER-1 trial and previous Western real-world studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeokyeong Shin
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Bo Hyun Moon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Baek-Yeol Ryoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Heung-Moon Chang
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyu-Pyo Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong Sang Hong
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Won Kim
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Sook Ryu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Il Kim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| | - Changhoon Yoo
- Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Carbo-Bague I, Li C, McNeil BL, Gao Y, McDonagh AW, Van de Voorde M, Ooms M, Kunz P, Yang H, Radchenko V, Schreckenbach G, Ramogida CF. Comparative Study of a Decadentate Acyclic Chelate, HOPO-O 10, and Its Octadentate Analogue, HOPO-O 8, for Radiopharmaceutical Applications. Inorg Chem 2023; 62:20549-20566. [PMID: 36608341 DOI: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c03671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Radiolanthanides and actinides are aptly suited for the diagnosis and treatment of cancer via nuclear medicine because they possess unique chemical and physical properties (e.g., radioactive decay emissions). These rare radiometals have recently shown the potential to selectively deliver a radiation payload to cancer cells. However, their clinical success is highly dependent on finding a suitable ligand for stable chelation and conjugation to a disease-targeting vector. Currently, the commercially available chelates exploited in the radiopharmaceutical design do not fulfill all of the requirements for nuclear medicine applications, and there is a need to further explore their chemistry to rationally design highly specific chelates. Herein, we describe the rational design and chemical development of a novel decadentate acyclic chelate containing five 1,2-hydroxypyridinones, 3,4,3,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO), referred to herein as HOPO-O10, based on the well-known octadentate ligand 3,4,3-(LI-1,2-HOPO), referred to herein as HOPO-O8, a highly efficient chelator for 89Zr[Zr4+]. Analysis by 1H NMR spectroscopy and mass spectrometry of the La3+ and Tb3+ complexes revealed that HOPO-O10 forms bimetallic complexes compared to HOPO-O8, which only forms monometallic species. The radiolabeling properties of both chelates were screened with [135La]La3+, [155/161Tb]Tb3+, [225Ac]Ac3+ and, [227Th]Th4+. Comparable high specific activity was observed for the [155/161Tb]Tb3+ complexes, outperforming the gold-standard 1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetraacetic acid, yet HOPO-O10 surpassed HOPO-O8 with higher [227Th]Th4+ affinity and improved complex stability in a human serum challenge assay. A comprehensive analysis of the decadentate and octadentate chelates was performed with density functional theory for the La3+, Ac3+, Eu3+, Tb3+, Lu3+, and Th4+ complexes. The computational simulations demonstrated the enhanced stability of Th4+-HOPO-O10 over Th4+-HOPO-O8. This investigation reveals the potential of HOPO-O10 for the stable chelation of large tetravalent radioactinides for nuclear medicine applications and provides insight for further chelate development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Imma Carbo-Bague
- Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British ColumbiaV5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Cen Li
- Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, ManitobaR3T 2N2, Canada
| | - Brooke L McNeil
- Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British ColumbiaV5A 1S6, Canada
- Life Sciences Division, TRIUMF, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 2A3, Canada
| | - Yang Gao
- Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, ManitobaR3T 2N2, Canada
- Institute of Fundamental and Frontier Sciences, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, Sichuan610054, China
| | - Anthony W McDonagh
- Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British ColumbiaV5A 1S6, Canada
| | | | - Maarten Ooms
- NURA Research Group, Belgian Nuclear Research Center, SCK CEN, 2400Mol, Belgium
| | - Peter Kunz
- Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British ColumbiaV5A 1S6, Canada
- Accelerator Division, TRIUMF, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 2A3, Canada
| | - Hua Yang
- Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British ColumbiaV5A 1S6, Canada
- Life Sciences Division, TRIUMF, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 2A3, Canada
| | - Valery Radchenko
- Life Sciences Division, TRIUMF, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 2A3, Canada
- Department of Chemistry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 1Z1, Canada
| | - Georg Schreckenbach
- Department of Chemistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, ManitobaR3T 2N2, Canada
| | - Caterina F Ramogida
- Department of Chemistry, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British ColumbiaV5A 1S6, Canada
- Life Sciences Division, TRIUMF, Vancouver, British ColumbiaV6T 2A3, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fu H, Huang J, Zhao T, Wang H, Chen Y, Xu W, Pang Y, Guo W, Sun L, Wu H, Xu P, Su B, Zhang J, Chen X, Chen H. Fibroblast Activation Protein-Targeted Radioligand Therapy with 177Lu-EB-FAPI for Metastatic Radioiodine-Refractory Thyroid Cancer: First-in-Human, Dose-Escalation Study. Clin Cancer Res 2023; 29:4740-4750. [PMID: 37801296 PMCID: PMC10690094 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-1983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2023] [Revised: 08/20/2023] [Accepted: 10/02/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Fibroblast activation protein (FAP) is a promising target for tumor treatment. In this study, we aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of the albumin binder-conjugated FAP-targeted radiopharmaceutical, 177Lu-EB-FAPI (177Lu-LNC1004), in patients with metastatic radioiodine-refractory thyroid cancer (mRAIR-TC). PATIENTS AND METHODS This open-label, non-randomized, first-in-human, dose-escalation, investigator-initiated trial had a 3+3 design and involved a 6-week 177Lu-LNC1004 treatment cycle in patients with mRAIR-TC at 2.22 GBq initially, with subsequent cohorts receiving an incremental 50% dose increase until dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. RESULTS 177Lu-LNC1004 administration was well tolerated, with no life-threatening adverse events observed. No patients experienced DLT in Group A (2.22 GBq/cycle). One patient experienced grade 4 thrombocytopenia in Group B (3.33 GBq/cycle); hence, another three patients were enrolled, none of whom experienced DLT. Two patients experienced grade 3 and 4 hematotoxicity in Group C (4.99 GBq/cycle). The mean whole-body effective dose was 0.17 ± 0.04 mSv/MBq. Intense 177Lu-LNC1004 uptake and prolonged tumor retention resulted in high mean absorbed tumor doses (8.50 ± 12.36 Gy/GBq). The mean effective half-lives for the whole-body and tumor lesions were 90.20 ± 7.68 and 92.46 ± 9.66 hours, respectively. According to RECIST, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease were observed in 3 (25%), 7 (58%), and 2 (17%) patients, respectively. The objective response and disease control rates were 25% and 83%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS FAP-targeted radioligand therapy with 177Lu-LNC1004 at 3.33 GBq/cycle was well tolerated in patients with advanced mRAIR-TC, with high radiation dose delivery to the tumor lesions, encouraging therapeutic efficacy, and acceptable side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Fu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jingxiong Huang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Tianzhi Zhao
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hongjian Wang
- School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yuhang Chen
- School of Clinical Medicine, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Weizhi Xu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Yizhen Pang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Wei Guo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Long Sun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Hua Wu
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Pengfei Xu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Bishan Su
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Xiaoyuan Chen
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Surgery, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine and Faculty of Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Clinical Imaging Research Centre, Centre for Translational Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- Nanomedicine Translational Research Program, NUS Center for Nanomedicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Haojun Chen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Minnan PET Center, Xiamen Key Laboratory of Radiopharmaceuticals, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, School of Medicine, Xiamen University, Xiamen, China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Al-Toubah T, Montilla-Soler J, El-Haddad G, Haider M, Strosberg J. Somatostatin Receptor Expression in Lung Neuroendocrine Tumors: An Analysis of DOTATATE PET Scans. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1895-1898. [PMID: 37797976 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.123.266185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2023] [Revised: 09/16/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Somatostatin receptor (SSTR) expression in metastatic lung neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) has not been well characterized using PET imaging. Understanding the degree and uniformity of SSTR expression is important to establish the role of SSTR-targeted treatments in lung NETs. Methods: A retrospective institutional review of patients with metastatic lung NETs who underwent DOTATATE PET imaging from March 2017 to February 2023 was performed. Results: In total, 48 patients with metastatic lung NETs who underwent 68Ga- or 64Cu-DOTATATE PET imaging were identified. Four had completely negative SSTR expression, and 10 had very weak expression (less than in a normal liver). Among the remaining 34 patients, 21 had uniformly positive DOTATATE PET scans, and 13 had heterogeneous expression. Only 44% had uniformly positive receptor expression, identifying them as candidates for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Conclusion: Most metastatic lung NETs lack uniform SSTR expression and are thus suboptimal candidates for SSTR-targeted therapy. SSTR imaging in lung NETs should be evaluated carefully for uniformity of expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taymeyah Al-Toubah
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; and
| | - Jaime Montilla-Soler
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ghassan El-Haddad
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Nuclear Medicine, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida
| | - Mintallah Haider
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; and
| | - Jonathan Strosberg
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; and
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Murphy R, Chander G, Martinez M, Ward C, Khan SR, Naik M, Barwick T, Aboagye E, Sharma R. Study protocol of LANTana: a phase Ib study to investigate epigenetic modification of somatostatin receptor-2 with ASTX727 to improve therapeutic outcome with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours, UK. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075221. [PMID: 37879695 PMCID: PMC10603539 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Suitability for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) for neuroendocrine neoplasia (NENs) depends on presence of somatostatin receptor-2 (SSTR2) determined by [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide-positron emission tomography (PET). Some patients have low or no uptake on [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide-PET, precluding PRRT. The upstream promoter region of SSRT2 is methylated, with percentage of methylation correlating with SSTR2 expression. Demethylating agents increase uptake on PET imaging in vivo such that tumours previously negative on PET become positive, correlating with a dose dependent increase in tumorous SSTR2 expression. LANTana will determine whether treatment with the demethylating agent, ASTX727, results in re-expression of SSTR2 using [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide-PET to image epigenetic modification of the SSTR2 locus, allowing subsequent PRRT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS 27 participants with a histological diagnosis of NEN (Ki67<55%) with no or low uptake on baseline [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-TATE-PET/CT will be recruited. Patients will receive 5 days of ASTX727 (fixed dose 35 mg decitabine+100 mg cedazuridine). [68Ga]Ga-DOTA-peptide-PET/CT will be repeated day 8±2; where there is significant uptake greater than liver in most lesions, PRRT will be administered. Primary objective is to determine re-expression of SSTR2 on PET imaging. Tolerability, progression-free survival, overall response and quality of life will be assessed. Methylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tumorous methylation will be evaluated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION LANTana has ethical approval from Leeds West Research Ethics Committee (REC Reference: 21/YH/0247).Sponsored by Imperial College London and funded by Advanced Accelerator Applications pharmaceuticals. Results will be presented at conferences and submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication and will be available on ClinicalTrials.gov. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS EUDRACT number: 2020-003800-15, NCT05178693.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ravindhi Murphy
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Gurvin Chander
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Maria Martinez
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Caroline Ward
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Sairah R Khan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Mitesh Naik
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tara Barwick
- Department of Cancer and Surgery, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Department of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Eric Aboagye
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rohini Sharma
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Halfdanarson TR, Mallak N, Paulson S, Chandrasekharan C, Natwa M, Kendi AT, Kennecke HF. Monitoring and Surveillance of Patients with Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Undergoing Radioligand Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4836. [PMID: 37835530 PMCID: PMC10571645 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15194836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 09/15/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioligand therapy (RLT) with [177Lu]Lu-DOTA-TATE is a standard of care for adult patients with somatostatin-receptor (SSTR)-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). Taking advantage of this precision nuclear medicine approach requires diligent monitoring and surveillance, from the use of diagnostic SSTR-targeted radioligand imaging for the selection of patients through treatment and assessments of response. Published evidence-based guidelines assist the multidisciplinary healthcare team by providing acceptable approaches to care; however, the sheer heterogeneity of GEP-NETs can make these frameworks difficult to apply in individual clinical circumstances. There are also contradictions in the literature regarding the utility of novel approaches in monitoring and surveilling patients with GEP-NETs receiving RLT. This article discusses the emerging evidence on imaging, clinical biochemistry, and tumor assessment criteria in the management of patients receiving RLT for GEP-NETs; additionally, it documents our own best practices. This allows us to offer practical guidance on how to effectively implement monitoring and surveillance measures to aid patient-tailored clinical decision-making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nadine Mallak
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Therapy, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA;
| | | | | | - Mona Natwa
- Langone Health, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Chicheportiche A, Sason M, Zidan M, Godefroy J, Krausz Y, Gross DJ, Grozinsky-Glasberg S, Ben-Haim S. Impact of Single-Time-Point Estimates of 177Lu-PRRT Absorbed Doses on Patient Management: Validation of a Trained Multiple-Linear-Regression Model in 159 Patients and 477 Therapy Cycles. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1610-1616. [PMID: 37500259 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.264923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Dosimetry after 177Lu-DOTATATE peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) enables estimation of radiation doses absorbed by normal organs and target lesions. This process is time-consuming and requires multiple posttreatment studies on several subsequent days. In a previous study, we described a newly developed multiple-linear-regression model to predict absorbed doses (ADs) from a single-time-point (STP) posttreatment study acquired 168 h after the first infusion and 24 h after the following ones, with similar results to the standard multiple-time-point (MTP) protocol. The present study aimed to validate this model in a large patient cohort and to assess whether STP dosimetry affects patient management decisions compared with our MTP protocol. Methods: Quantitative 177Lu-DOTATATE SPECT/CT post-PRRT data from 159 consecutive patients (172 therapies, 477 therapy cycles) were retrospectively analyzed. ADs obtained from an STP model were compared with those obtained using an MTP model. We evaluated the impact of the STP model on the decision on whether PRRT should be stopped because of an expected kidney AD exceeding the safety threshold. We hypothesized that patient management based on the STP model does not differ from that based on the MTP model in at least 90% of the cases. Results: There was no difference in management decisions between the MTP and STP models in 170 of 172 therapies (98.8%). A Fisher χ2 test for combined probabilities produced a composite P value of 0.0003. Mean cumulative AD relative differences between the STP and MTP models were 0.8% ± 8.0%, -7.7% ± 4.8%, 0.0% ± 11.4%, -2.8% ± 6.3%, and -2.1% ± 18.4% for kidneys, bone marrow, liver, spleen, and tumors, respectively (Pearson r = 0.99 for all), for patients who underwent 4 therapy cycles. Similar results were obtained with fewer therapy cycles. Conclusion: Estimated radiation ADs and patient management decisions were similar with the STP and MTP models. The STP model can simplify the dosimetry process while also reducing scanner and staff time and improving patient comfort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandre Chicheportiche
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel;
| | - Moshe Sason
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Mahmoud Zidan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Jeremy Godefroy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Yodphat Krausz
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - David J Gross
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; and
| | - Simona Grozinsky-Glasberg
- Neuroendocrine Tumor Unit, ENETS Center of Excellence, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; and
| | - Simona Ben-Haim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Biophysics, Hadassah Medical Organization and Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
- University College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kunos CA, Lemieux BP, Recca K, Oates ME, El Khouli RH. Leveraging Radiopharmaceutical Programmatic Collaboration for Management of Pretherapy and On-treatment Urinary Incontinence. HEALTH PHYSICS 2023; 125:316-319. [PMID: 37548565 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001721] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/08/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Many parenteral radiopharmaceuticals available as anticancer therapy are filtered by the kidneys and excreted in the urine. Here, physician leaders of radiation medicine, nuclear medicine/molecular imaging, and the radiotheranostics programs as well as radiation safety officers, collaborated to develop a decision-making guideline for the administration of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals in patients with pretherapy or day-of-treatment incontinence. We discussed challenges and opportunities in the screening of patients in urine collection strategies according to grade of urinary incontinence and in subsequent coordination of care. Lutetium-177 ( 177 Lu)-based radiopharmaceutical therapies provided clinical examples of how our procedures were operationalized. Our key management issues of urinary incontinence were cutaneous radiation injury and redness, infection, or pain. In response, we developed clinical practice guidelines for the recognition and management of incontinence-related adverse events. Common adverse events of urinary incontinence were noted in this study. Our how-to guideline for the safe administration of therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals for patients with urinary incontinence warrants further investigation and should continue to be evaluated across all radiopharmaceutical therapy agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles A Kunos
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY
| | | | - Kimyli Recca
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging & Radiotheranostics, Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - M Elizabeth Oates
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging & Radiotheranostics, Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Riham H El Khouli
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine/Molecular Imaging & Radiotheranostics, Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gabiache G, Zadro C, Rozenblum L, Vezzosi D, Mouly C, Thoulouzan M, Guimbaud R, Otal P, Dierickx L, Rousseau H, Trepanier C, Dercle L, Mokrane FZ. Image-Guided Precision Medicine in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4666. [PMID: 37760633 PMCID: PMC10526298 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
In this comprehensive review, we aimed to discuss the current state-of-the-art medical imaging for pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) diagnosis and treatment. Despite major medical improvements, PPGLs, as with other neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), leave clinicians facing several challenges; their inherent particularities and their diagnosis and treatment pose several challenges for clinicians due to their inherent complexity, and they require management by multidisciplinary teams. The conventional concepts of medical imaging are currently undergoing a paradigm shift, thanks to developments in radiomic and metabolic imaging. However, despite active research, clinical relevance of these new parameters remains unclear, and further multicentric studies are needed in order to validate and increase widespread use and integration in clinical routine. Use of AI in PPGLs may detect changes in tumor phenotype that precede classical medical imaging biomarkers, such as shape, texture, and size. Since PPGLs are rare, slow-growing, and heterogeneous, multicentric collaboration will be necessary to have enough data in order to develop new PPGL biomarkers. In this nonsystematic review, our aim is to present an exhaustive pedagogical tool based on real-world cases, dedicated to physicians dealing with PPGLs, augmented by perspectives of artificial intelligence and big data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gildas Gabiache
- Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31400 Toulouse, France (F.-Z.M.)
| | - Charline Zadro
- Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31400 Toulouse, France (F.-Z.M.)
| | - Laura Rozenblum
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Sorbonne Université, AP-HP, Hôpital La Pitié-Salpêtrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - Delphine Vezzosi
- Department of Endocrinology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Céline Mouly
- Department of Endocrinology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | | | - Rosine Guimbaud
- Department of Oncology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Philippe Otal
- Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31400 Toulouse, France (F.-Z.M.)
| | - Lawrence Dierickx
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, IUCT-Oncopole, 31059 Toulouse, France;
| | - Hervé Rousseau
- Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31400 Toulouse, France (F.-Z.M.)
| | - Christopher Trepanier
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Laurent Dercle
- New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Department of Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
| | - Fatima-Zohra Mokrane
- Department of Radiology, Rangueil University Hospital, 31400 Toulouse, France (F.-Z.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ravizzini G, Erwin W, De Palatis L, Martiniova L, Subbiah V, Paolillo V, Mitchell J, McCoy AP, Gonzalez J, Mawlawi O. Dosimetry of a Novel 111Indium-Labeled Anti-P-Cadherin Monoclonal Antibody (FF-21101) in Non-Human Primates. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4532. [PMID: 37760501 PMCID: PMC10526467 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15184532] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
P-cadherin is associated with a wide range of tumor types, making it an attractive therapeutic target. FF-21101 is a human-mouse chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) directed against human P-cadherin, which has been radioconjugated with indium-111 (111In) utilizing a DOTA chelator. We investigated the biodistribution of FF-21101(111In) in cynomolgus macaques and extrapolated the results to estimate internal radiation doses of 111In- and yttrium-90 (90Y)-FF-21101 for targeted radioimmunotherapy in humans. Whole-body planar and SPECT imaging were performed at 0, 2, 24, 48, 72, 96, and 120 h post-injection, using a dual-head gamma camera. Volumes of interest of identifiable source organs of radioactivity were defined on aligned reference CT and serial SPECT images. Organs with the highest estimated dose values (mSv/MBq) for FF-21101(111In) were the lungs (0.840), spleen (0.816), liver (0.751), kidneys (0.629), and heart wall (0.451); and for FF-21101(90Y) dose values were: lungs (10.49), spleen (8.21), kidneys (5.92), liver (5.46), and heart wall (2.61). FF-21101(111In) exhibits favorable biodistribution in cynomolgus macaques and estimated human dosimetric characteristics. Data obtained in this study were used to support the filing of an investigational new drug application with the FDA for a Phase I clinical trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory Ravizzini
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1483, Houston, TX 77030, USA (J.G.)
| | - William Erwin
- Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.E.); (O.M.)
| | - Louis De Palatis
- Technology and Business Development, Center for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Lucia Martiniova
- Department of Experimental Therapeutics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Vivek Subbiah
- Department of Investigational Cancer Therapeutics, Division of Cancer Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Vincenzo Paolillo
- Cyclotron Radiochemistry Facility, Center for Advanced Biomedical Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Jennifer Mitchell
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA;
| | - Asa P. McCoy
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1483, Houston, TX 77030, USA (J.G.)
| | - Jose Gonzalez
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler St., Unit 1483, Houston, TX 77030, USA (J.G.)
| | - Osama Mawlawi
- Department of Imaging Physics, Division of Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA; (W.E.); (O.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Wang C, Peterson AB, Wong KK, Roseland ME, Schipper MJ, Dewaraja YK. Single-Time-Point Imaging for Dosimetry After [ 177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE: Accuracy of Existing Methods and Novel Data-Driven Models for Reducing Sensitivity to Time-Point Selection. J Nucl Med 2023; 64:1463-1470. [PMID: 37500260 PMCID: PMC10478823 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.122.265338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Estimation of the time-integrated activity (TIA) for dosimetry from imaging at a single time point (STP) facilitates the clinical translation of dosimetry-guided radiopharmaceutical therapy. However, the accuracy of the STP methods for TIA estimation varies on the basis of time-point selection. We constructed patient data-driven regression models to reduce the sensitivity to time-point selection and to compare these new models with commonly used STP methods. Methods: SPECT/CT performed at time period (TP) 1 (3-5 h), TP2 (days 1-2), TP3 (days 3-5), and TP4 (days 6-8) after cycle 1 of [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE therapy involved 27 patients with 100 segmented tumors and 54 kidneys. Influenced by the previous physics-based STP models of Madsen et al. and Hänscheid et al., we constructed an STP prediction expression, TIA = A(t) × g(t), in a SPECT data-driven way (model 1), in which A(t) is the observed activity at imaging time t, and the curve, g(t), is estimated with a nonparametric generalized additive model by minimizing the normalized mean square error relative to the TIA derived from 4-time-point SPECT (reference TIA). Furthermore, we fit a generalized additive model that incorporates baseline biomarkers as auxiliary data in addition to the single activity measurement (model 2). Leave-one-out cross validation was performed to evaluate STP models using mean absolute error (MAE) and mean square error between the predicted and reference TIA. Results: At days 3-5, all evaluated STP methods performed very well, with an MAE of less than 7% (between-patient SD of <10%) for both kidneys and tumors. At other TPs, the Madsen method and data-driven models 1 and 2 performed reasonably well (MAEs < 17% for kidneys and < 32% for tumors), whereas the error with the Hänscheid method was substantially higher. The proof of concept of adding baseline biomarkers to the prediction model was demonstrated and showed a moderate enhancement at TP1, especially for estimating kidney TIA (MAE ± SD from 15.6% ± 1.3% to 11.8% ± 1.0%). Evaluations on 500 virtual patients using clinically relevant time-activity simulations showed a similar performance. Conclusion: The performance of the Madsen method and proposed data-driven models is less sensitive to TP selection than is the Hänscheid method. At the earliest TP, which is the most practical, the model incorporating baseline biomarkers outperforms other methods that rely only on the single activity measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chang Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan;
| | - Avery B Peterson
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan; and
| | - Ka Kit Wong
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Molly E Roseland
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Matthew J Schipper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Yuni K Dewaraja
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Nautiyal A, Jha AK, Konuparamban A, Mithun S, Srichandan T, Puranik A, Gala K, Shetty N, Kulkarni S, Rangarajan V. A dosimetric comparison of systemic peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and intra-arterial peptide receptor radionuclide therapy in patients with liver dominant gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Nucl Med Commun 2023; 44:585-595. [PMID: 37038926 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/12/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intra-arterial radionuclide therapy (IART) treatment allows direct delivery of 177 Lu-DOTATATE to the overexpressed somatostatin-positive neuroendocrine liver metastases, which led to higher tumour concentration compared with systemic radionuclide therapy (SRT). The aim was to evaluate and compare the absorbed doses of both IART and SRT to organs and hepatic metastatic sites. METHODS A total of 48 patients received SRT and IART. In SRT, activity was administered intravenously, whereas in IART, activity was administered directly into hepatic arteries. The sequential whole-body images were acquired at 2, 4, 24, 72 and 160 h. The reconstructed whole-body planar and single-photon emission computed tomography-computed tomography images were processed using the Dosimetry Toolkit for the estimation of normalized cumulated activity in the organs and tumour lesions. The absorbed dose was computed using OLINDA EXM 2.0 software. RESULTS The median absorbed dose (mGy/MBq) of kidneys and spleen in IART was compared with SRT and found to be decreased by 30.7% ( P = 0.03) and 37.5% ( P = 0.08), whereas it was found to be increased by 40% ( P = 0.26) and 8.1% ( P = 0.28) in the liver and lungs. The median dose (mGy/MBq) of tumours determined in IART was found to be increased by 62.2% ( P = 0.04). CONCLUSION IART with 177 Lu-DOTATATE significantly increases tumour dose while reducing overall systemic toxicity in comparison to SRT treatment. After considering the maximum tolerance limit of kidneys in peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, the number of treatment cycles and injected activity can be optimized further with IART for better response and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amit Nautiyal
- Advanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer (ACTREC), Kharghar, Navi Mumbai
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
| | - Ashish K Jha
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Acsah Konuparamban
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Sneha Mithun
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | | | - Ameya Puranik
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| | - Kunal Gala
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Nithin Shetty
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Suyash Kulkarni
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
| | - Venkatesh Rangarajan
- Homi Bhabha National Institute
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Burkett BJ, Bartlett DJ, McGarrah PW, Lewis AR, Johnson DR, Berberoğlu K, Pandey MK, Packard AT, Halfdanarson TR, Hruska CB, Johnson GB, Kendi AT. A Review of Theranostics: Perspectives on Emerging Approaches and Clinical Advancements. Radiol Imaging Cancer 2023; 5:e220157. [PMID: 37477566 PMCID: PMC10413300 DOI: 10.1148/rycan.220157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/31/2023] [Indexed: 07/22/2023]
Abstract
Theranostics is the combination of two approaches-diagnostics and therapeutics-applied for decades in cancer imaging using radiopharmaceuticals or paired radiopharmaceuticals to image and selectively treat various cancers. The clinical use of theranostics has increased in recent years, with U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of lutetium 177 (177Lu) tetraazacyclododecane tetraacetic acid octreotate (DOTATATE) and 177Lu-prostate-specific membrane antigen vector-based radionuclide therapies. The field of theranostics has imminent potential for emerging clinical applications. This article reviews critical areas of active clinical advancement in theranostics, including forthcoming clinical trials advancing FDA-approved and emerging radiopharmaceuticals, approaches to dosimetry calculations, imaging of different radionuclide therapies, expanded indications for currently used theranostic agents to treat a broader array of cancers, and emerging ideas in the field. Keywords: Molecular Imaging, Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Molecular Imaging-Clinical Translation, Molecular Imaging-Target Development, PET/CT, SPECT/CT, Radionuclide Therapy, Dosimetry, Oncology, Radiobiology © RSNA, 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian J. Burkett
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - David J. Bartlett
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Patrick W. McGarrah
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Akeem R. Lewis
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Derek R. Johnson
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Kezban Berberoğlu
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Mukesh K. Pandey
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Annie T. Packard
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Thorvardur R. Halfdanarson
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Carrie B. Hruska
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - Geoffrey B. Johnson
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| | - A. Tuba Kendi
- From the Department of Radiology (B.J.B., D.J.B., D.R.J., M.K.P.,
A.T.P., C.B.H., G.B.J., A.T.K.) and Division of Medical Oncology (P.W.M.,
A.R.L., T.R.H.), Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905; and
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Anadolu Medical Center, Gebze/Kocaeli, Turkey
(K.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ladrière T, Faudemer J, Levigoureux E, Peyronnet D, Desmonts C, Vigne J. Safety and Therapeutic Optimization of Lutetium-177 Based Radiopharmaceuticals. Pharmaceutics 2023; 15:pharmaceutics15041240. [PMID: 37111725 PMCID: PMC10145759 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 03/24/2023] [Accepted: 04/07/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) using Lutetium-177 (177Lu) based radiopharmaceuticals has emerged as a therapeutic area in the field of nuclear medicine and oncology, allowing for personalized medicine. Since the first market authorization in 2018 of [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-DOTATATE (Lutathera®) targeting somatostatin receptor type 2 in the treatment of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, intensive research has led to transfer innovative 177Lu containing pharmaceuticals to the clinic. Recently, a second market authorization in the field was obtained for [¹⁷⁷Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 (Pluvicto®) in the treatment of prostate cancer. The efficacy of 177Lu radiopharmaceuticals are now quite well-reported and data on the safety and management of patients are needed. This review will focus on several clinically tested and reported tailored approaches to enhance the risk-benefit trade-off of radioligand therapy. The aim is to help clinicians and nuclear medicine staff set up safe and optimized procedures using the approved 177Lu based radiopharmaceuticals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Typhanie Ladrière
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Department of Pharmacy, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Julie Faudemer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Elise Levigoureux
- Hospices Civils de Lyon, Groupement Hospitalier Est, 69677 Bron, France
- Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, CNRS UMR5292, INSERM U1028, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69677 Bron, France
| | - Damien Peyronnet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Department of Pharmacy, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Cédric Desmonts
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- INSERM U1086, ANTICIPE, Normandy University, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Jonathan Vigne
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- Department of Pharmacy, CHU de Caen Normandie, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
- PhIND, Centre Cyceron, Institut Blood and Brain @ Caen-Normandie, INSERM U1237, Normandie Université, UNICAEN, 14000 Caen, France
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Zoberi JE, Garcia‐Ramirez J, Luechtefeld D, Maughan NM, Amurao M, Oyama R, Baumann BC, Gay HA, Michalski JM. Logistical, technical, and radiation safety aspects of establishing a radiopharmaceutical therapy program: A case in Lutetium-177 prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) therapy. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2023; 24:e13899. [PMID: 36637862 PMCID: PMC10113704 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.13899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a cell surface protein highly expressed in nearly all prostate cancers, with restricted expression in some normal tissues. The differential expression of PSMA from tumor to non-tumor tissue has resulted in the investigation of numerous targeting strategies for therapy of patients with metastatic prostate cancer. In March of 2022, the FDA granted approval for the use of lutetium-177 PSMA-617 (Lu-177-PSMA-617) for patients with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have been treated with androgen receptor pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy. Therefore, the use of Lu-177-PSMA-617 is expected to increase and become more widespread. Herein, we describe logistical, technical, and radiation safety considerations for implementing a radiopharmaceutical therapy program, with particular focus on the development of operating procedures for therapeutic administrations. Major steps for a center in the U.S. to implement a new radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) program are listed below, and then demonstrated in greater detail via examples for Lu-177-PSMA-617 therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacqueline E. Zoberi
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Jose Garcia‐Ramirez
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - David Luechtefeld
- Environmental Health and SafetyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Nichole M. Maughan
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Maxwell Amurao
- Environmental Health and SafetyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Reiko Oyama
- MIR Cyclotron Facility and Nuclear PharmacyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Brian C. Baumann
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Hiram A. Gay
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| | - Jeff M. Michalski
- Department of Radiation OncologyWashington University School of MedicineSaint LouisMissouriUSA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Schwarz JL, Williams JK, Keutgen XM, Liao CY. Light It Up! The Use of DOTATATE in Diagnosis and Treatment of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms. Surg Pathol Clin 2023; 16:151-161. [PMID: 36739162 DOI: 10.1016/j.path.2022.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Radiolabeled somatostatin analogs are increasingly used in the diagnosis and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors. Diagnostic imaging with 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT has demonstrated the improved sensitivity in detecting primary and metastatic neuroendocrine lesions compared with conventional imaging and prior generation somatostatin receptor imaging. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy with 177Lu-DOTATATE is now frequently included in the management of neuroendocrine neoplasms, with prospective randomized control studies demonstrating its beneficial impact on survival and quality of life. Nonetheless, peptide rector radionuclide therapy is still considered palliative rather than curative and may be accompanied by adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason L Schwarz
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 6040, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Jelani K Williams
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 6040, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Xavier M Keutgen
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC 4052, Chicago, IL 60637, USA
| | - Chih-Yi Liao
- Department of Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, University of Chicago Medicine, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, MC2115, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
D'Souza JC, O'Brien SR, Yang Z, El Jack AK, Pantel AR. Widespread micronodular hepatic metastases of neuroendocrine tumor detected by [68Ga]DOTATATE PET/CT. Radiol Case Rep 2023; 18:481-485. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2022.10.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 10/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
34
|
Shah HJ, Ruppell E, Bokhari R, Aland P, Lele VR, Ge C, McIntosh LJ. Current and upcoming radionuclide therapies in the direction of precision oncology: A narrative review. Eur J Radiol Open 2023; 10:100477. [PMID: 36785643 PMCID: PMC9918751 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejro.2023.100477] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/13/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
As new molecular tracers are identified to target specific receptors, tissue, and tumor types, opportunities arise for the development of both diagnostic tracers and their therapeutic counterparts, termed "theranostics." While diagnostic tracers utilize positron emitters or gamma-emitting radionuclides, their theranostic counterparts are typically bound to beta and alpha emitters, which can deliver specific and localized radiation to targets with minimal collateral damage to uninvolved surrounding structures. This is an exciting time in molecular imaging and therapy and a step towards personalized and precise medicine in which patients who were either without treatment options or not candidates for other therapies now have expanded options, with tangible data showing improved outcomes. This manuscript explores the current state of theranostics, providing background, treatment specifics, and toxicities, and discusses future potential trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hina J. Shah
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA,Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA 02115, USA,Corresponding author at: Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| | - Evan Ruppell
- Department of Radiology, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
| | - Rozan Bokhari
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Lahey Health, Burlington, MA 01803, USA
| | - Parag Aland
- In-charge Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Infinity Medical Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400015, India
| | - Vikram R. Lele
- Chief, Department of Nuclear Medicine and PET/CT, Jaslok Hospital and Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra 400026, India
| | - Connie Ge
- University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School, Worcester, MA 01655, USA
| | - Lacey J. McIntosh
- Division of Oncologic and Molecular Imaging, University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School / Memorial Health Care, Worcester, MA 0165, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Aboagye EO, Barwick TD, Haberkorn U. Radiotheranostics in oncology: Making precision medicine possible. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:255-274. [PMID: 36622841 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21768] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
A quintessential setting for precision medicine, theranostics refers to a rapidly evolving field of medicine in which disease is diagnosed followed by treatment of disease-positive patients using tools for the therapy identical or similar to those used for the diagnosis. Against the backdrop of only-treat-when-visualized, the goal is a high therapeutic index with efficacy markedly surpassing toxicity. Oncology leads the way in theranostics innovation, where the approach has become possible with the identification of unique proteins and other factors selectively expressed in cancer versus healthy tissue, advances in imaging technology able to report these tissue factors, and major understanding of targeting chemicals and nanodevices together with methods to attach labels or warheads for imaging and therapy. Radiotheranostics-using radiopharmaceuticals-is becoming routine in patients with prostate cancer and neuroendocrine tumors who express the proteins PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) and SSTR2 (somatostatin receptor 2), respectively, on their cancer. The palpable excitement in the field stems from the finding that a proportion of patients with large metastatic burden show complete and partial responses, and this outcome is catalyzing the search for more radiotheranostics approaches. Not every patient will benefit from radiotheranostics; but, for those who cross the target-detected line, the likelihood of response is very high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric O Aboagye
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Tara D Barwick
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
- Department of Imaging, Imperial College Healthcare National Health Service Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Uwe Haberkorn
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Clinical Cooperation Unit Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
- Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg, German Center for Lung Research, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Elhelf IAS, Clemenshaw M. Interventional Radiology in the Era of Radiotheranostics: An Update for Interventional Radiologists! Semin Intervent Radiol 2022; 39:587-590. [PMID: 36561794 PMCID: PMC9767766 DOI: 10.1055/s-0042-1759703] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Islam A. S. Elhelf
- Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| | - Michael Clemenshaw
- Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Galgano SJ, Morani AC, Gopireddy DR, Sharbidre K, Bates DDB, Goenka AH, Arif-Tiwari H, Itani M, Iravani A, Javadi S, Faria S, Lall C, Bergsland E, Verma S, Francis IR, Halperin DM, Chatterjee D, Bhosale P, Yano M. Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: a 2022 update for radiologists. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2022; 47:3962-3970. [PMID: 35244755 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03466-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PaNENs) are a unique group of pancreatic neoplasms with a wide range of clinical presentations and behaviors. Given their heterogeneous appearance and increasing detection on cross-sectional imaging, it is essential that radiologists understand the variable presentation and distinctions PaNENs display compared to other pancreatic neoplasms. Additionally, some of these neoplasms may be hormonally functional, and it is imperative that radiologists be aware of the common clinical presentations of hormonally active PaNENs. Knowledge of PaNEN pathology and treatments may influence which imaging modality is optimal for each patient. Each imaging modality used for PaNENs has distinct advantages and disadvantages, particularly in different treatment settings. Thus, the focus of this manuscript is to provide an update for the radiologist on PaNEN pathology, imaging, and treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel J Galgano
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
| | | | - Dheeraj R Gopireddy
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kedar Sharbidre
- Department of Radiology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA
| | - David D B Bates
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ajit H Goenka
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Hina Arif-Tiwari
- Department of Radiology, University of Arizona-Tuscon, Tuscon, AZ, USA
| | - Malak Itani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Amir Iravani
- Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Sanaz Javadi
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Silvana Faria
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chandana Lall
- Department of Radiology, University of Florida-Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Emily Bergsland
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sadhna Verma
- Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Isaac R Francis
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Daniel M Halperin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Deyali Chatterjee
- Department of Pathology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Bhosale
- Department of Radiology, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Motoyo Yano
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Daube-Witherspoon ME, Pantel AR, Pryma DA, Karp JS. Total-body PET: a new paradigm for molecular imaging. Br J Radiol 2022; 95:20220357. [PMID: 35993615 PMCID: PMC9733603 DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20220357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2022] [Revised: 06/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Total body (TB) positron emission tomography (PET) instruments have dramatically changed the paradigm of PET clinical and research studies due to their very high sensitivity and capability to image dynamic radiopharmaceutical distributions in the major organs of the body simultaneously. In this manuscript, we review the design of these systems and discuss general challenges and trade-offs to maximize the performance gains of current TB-PET systems. We then describe new concepts and technology that may impact future TB-PET systems. The manuscript summarizes what has been learned from the initial sites with TB-PET and explores potential research and clinical applications of TB-PET. The current generation of TB-PET systems range in axial field-of-view (AFOV) from 1 to 2 m and serve to illustrate the benefits and opportunities of a longer AFOV for various applications in PET. In only a few years of use these new TB-PET systems have shown that they will play an important role in expanding the field of molecular imaging and benefiting clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Austin R Pantel
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Daniel A Pryma
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| | - Joel S Karp
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, United States
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
The Logistics of Starting a Radiotheranostics Center in An Academic Institution: Practical Lessons From Real-life Experience. Am J Clin Oncol 2022; 45:491-492. [PMID: 36413678 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
40
|
Hofland J, Brabander T, Verburg FA, Feelders RA, de Herder WW. Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2022; 107:3199-3208. [PMID: 36198028 PMCID: PMC9693835 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgac574] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The concept of using a targeting molecule labeled with a diagnostic radionuclide for using positron emission tomography or single photon emission computed tomography imaging with the potential to demonstrate that tumoricidal radiation can be delivered to tumoral sites by administration of the same or a similar targeting molecule labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide termed "theranostics." Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin analogs (SSAs) is a well-established second/third-line theranostic treatment for somatostatin receptor-positive well-differentiated (neuro-)endocrine neoplasms (NENs). PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE was approved by the regulatory authorities in 2017 and 2018 for selected patients with low-grade well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NENs. It improves progression-free survival as well as quality of life of GEP NEN patients. Favorable symptomatic and biochemical responses using PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE have also been reported in patients with functioning metastatic GEP NENs like metastatic insulinomas, Verner Morrison syndromes (VIPomas), glucagonomas, and gastrinomas and patients with carcinoid syndrome. This therapy might also become a valuable therapeutic option for inoperable low-grade bronchopulmonary NENs, inoperable or progressive pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas, and medullary thyroid carcinomas. First-line PRRT with 177Lu-DOTATATE and combinations of this therapy with cytotoxic drugs are currently under investigation. New radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands include SSAs coupled with alpha radiation emitting radionuclides and somatostatin receptor antagonists coupled with radionuclides.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Hofland
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa Brabander
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Frederik A Verburg
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Richard A Feelders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter W de Herder
- Correspondence: Wouter W. de Herder, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, ENETS Center of Excellence, Erasmus MC and Erasmus Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Cieslik P, Kubeil M, Zarschler K, Ullrich M, Brandt F, Anger K, Wadepohl H, Kopka K, Bachmann M, Pietzsch J, Stephan H, Comba P. Toward Personalized Medicine: One Chelator for Imaging and Therapy with Lutetium-177 and Actinium-225. J Am Chem Soc 2022; 144:21555-21567. [DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c08438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Cieslik
- Universität Heidelberg, Anorganisch-Chemisches Institut, INF 270, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Manja Kubeil
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Kristof Zarschler
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Martin Ullrich
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Florian Brandt
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
| | - Karl Anger
- Hochschule für Technik und Wirtschaft Dresden, Friedrich-List-Platz 1, 01069 Dresden, Germany
| | - Hubert Wadepohl
- Universität Heidelberg, Anorganisch-Chemisches Institut, INF 270, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Klaus Kopka
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Michael Bachmann
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) Dresden, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Jens Pietzsch
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
- Faculty of Chemistry and Food Chemistry, School of Science, Technische Universität Dresden, 01069 Dresden, Germany
| | - Holger Stephan
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiopharmaceutical Cancer Research, Bautzner Landstraße 400, 01328 Dresden, Germany
| | - Peter Comba
- Universität Heidelberg, Anorganisch-Chemisches Institut, INF 270, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Universität Heidelberg, Interdisciplinary Center for Scientific Computing, INF 205, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Quo Vadis, Teragnosis? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022; 41:341-344. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remnie.2022.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
43
|
Vercher-Conejero JL. Quo Vadis, Teragnosis? Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2022.10.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
|
44
|
Recca K, Muneeb A, Helstern C, Lemieux B, Das S, Jessop A. Evaluation of Patient Transmission Factor Following the Administration of 177Lu-DOTATATE. HEALTH PHYSICS 2022; 123:00004032-990000000-00038. [PMID: 36099424 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001611] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT 177Lu-DOTATATE is a radionuclide therapy that is FDA approved for the treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Treatment facilities are required to determine the maximum radiation dose from such subjects to the maximally exposed member of the public, ensuring that the total effective dose equivalent (TEDE) does not exceed regulatory limits. If the calculated TEDE meets the regulatory limits, the patient is eligible for release and provided instructions with radiation precautions. This study aims to determine a mean transmission factor to the patient to improve accuracy and individualize the estimation of the TEDE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Aeman Muneeb
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Office of Clinical and Research Safety, A-0201 MCN, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 27232
| | - Christopher Helstern
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Office of Clinical and Research Safety, A-0201 MCN, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 27232
| | - Bryan Lemieux
- University of Kentucky HealthCare, Department of Radiology, 800 Rose St., HX 307, Lexington, KY 40536
| | - Satya Das
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Office of Clinical and Research Safety, A-0201 MCN, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 27232
| | - Aaron Jessop
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center; Office of Clinical and Research Safety, A-0201 MCN, 1161 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 27232
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
A Treatment Paradigm Shift: Targeted Radionuclide Therapies for Metastatic Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174276. [PMID: 36077820 PMCID: PMC9454920 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2022] [Revised: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 08/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Metastatic prostate cancer has traditionally been treated with a combination of hormonal and chemotherapy regimens. With the recent FDA approval of targeted radionuclide therapeutics, there is now a new class of therapy that is routinely available to patients and clinicians. This review explores the most commonly studied therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals and their appropriate use and contraindications. Additionally, we detail how these therapeutic radiopharmaceuticals can fit into the common medical oncology practice and future directions of this field of medicine. Abstract The recent approval of 177Lu PSMA-617 (Pluvicto®) by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is the culmination of decades of work in advancing the field of targeted radionuclide therapy for metastatic prostate cancer. 177Lu PSMA-617, along with the bone specific radiotherapeutic agent, 223RaCl2 (Xofigo®), are now commonly used in routine clinical care as a tertiary line of therapy for men with metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer and for osseus metastatic disease respectively. While these radiopharmaceuticals are changing how metastatic prostate cancer is classified and treated, there is relatively little guidance to the practitioner and patient as to how best utilize these therapies, especially in conjunction with other more well-established regimens including hormonal, immunologic, and chemotherapeutic agents. This review article will go into detail about the mechanism and effectiveness of these radiopharmaceuticals and less well-known classes of targeted radionuclide radiopharmaceuticals including alpha emitting prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-, gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-, and somatostatin targeted radionuclide therapeutics. Additionally, a thorough discussion of the clinical approach of these agents is included and required futures studies.
Collapse
|
46
|
Lau J, Lee H, Rousseau J, Bénard F, Lin KS. Application of Cleavable Linkers to Improve Therapeutic Index of Radioligand Therapies. Molecules 2022; 27:molecules27154959. [PMID: 35956909 PMCID: PMC9370263 DOI: 10.3390/molecules27154959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Radioligand therapy (RLT) is an emergent drug class for cancer treatment. The dose administered to cancer patients is constrained by the radiation exposure to normal tissues to maintain an appropriate therapeutic index. When a radiopharmaceutical or its radiometabolite is retained in the kidneys, radiation dose deposition in the kidneys can become a dose-limiting factor. A good exemplar is [177Lu]Lu-DOTATATE, where patients receive a co-infusion of basic amino acids for nephroprotection. Besides peptides, there are other classes of targeting vectors like antibody fragments, antibody mimetics, peptidomimetics, and small molecules that clear through the renal pathway. In this review, we will review established and emerging strategies that can be used to mitigate radiation-induced nephrotoxicity, with a focus on the development and incorporation of cleavable linkers for radiopharmaceutical designs. Finally, we offer our perspectives on cleavable linkers for RLT, highlighting future areas of research that will help advance the technology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph Lau
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - Hwan Lee
- Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Julie Rousseau
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
| | - François Bénard
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Kuo-Shyan Lin
- Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1L3, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +1-604-675-8208
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Wong KK, Frey KA, Niedbala J, Kaza RK, Worden FP, Fitzpatrick KJ, Dewaraja YK. Differences in tumor-to-normal organ SUV ratios measured with 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET compared with 177 Lu-DOTATATE SPECT in patients with neuroendocrine tumors. Nucl Med Commun 2022; 43:892-900. [PMID: 35703269 PMCID: PMC9288505 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Our goal is to quantitatively compare radiotracer biodistributions within tumors and major normal organs on pretherapy 68 Ga-DOTATATE PET to post-therapy 177 Lu-DOTATATE single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients receiving peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT). METHODS PET/CT at ~ 60 min postinjection of Ga-68 DOTATATE and research 177 Lu-SPECT/CT imaging ~ at 4 h (SPECT1) and ~ 24 h (SPECT2) post-cycle#1 were available. Manual contours of lesions on baseline CT or MRI were applied to co-registered SPECT/CT and PET/CT followed by deep learning-based CT auto-segmentation of organs. Tumor-to-normal organ ratios (TNR) were calculated from standardized uptake values (SUV) mean and SUV peak for tumor, and SUV mean for non-tumoral liver (nliver), spleen and kidney. RESULTS There were 90 lesons in 24 patients with progressive metastatic neuroendocrine tumor. The correlation between PET and SPECT SUV TNRs were poor/moderate: PET versus SPECT1 R 2 = 0.19, 0.21, 0.29; PET versus SPECT2 R 2 = 0.06, 0.16, 0.33 for TNR nliver ,TNR spleen ,TNR kidney , respectively. Across all patients, the average value of the TNR measured on PET was significantly lower than on SPECT at both time points ( P < 0.001). Using SUV mean for tumor, average TNR values and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were PET: TNR nliver = 3.5 [CI: 3.0-3.9], TNR spleen = 1.3 [CI, 1.2-1.5], TNR kidney = 1.7 [CI: 1.6-1.9]; SPECT1: TNR nliver = 10 [CI: 8.2-11.7], TNR spleen = 2.9 [CI: 2.5-3.4], TNR kidney = 2.8 [CI: 2.3-3.3]; SPECT2: TNR nliver = 16.9 [CI: 14-19.9], TNR spleen = 3.6 [CI: 3-4.2], TNR kidney = 3.6 [CI: 3.0-4.2]. Comparison of PET and SPECT results in a sphere phantom study demonstrated that these differences are not attributed to imaging modality. CONCLUSIONS Differences in TNR exist for the theranostic pair, with significantly higher SUV TNR on 177 Lu SPECT compared with 68 Ga PET. We postulate this phenomenon is due to temporal differences in DOTATATE uptake and internalization in tumor as compared to normal organs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ka Kit Wong
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Kirk A. Frey
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Jeremy Niedbala
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Ravi K. Kaza
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Francis P. Worden
- Department of Endocrine Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Kellen J. Fitzpatrick
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| | - Yuni K. Dewaraja
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Parent EE, Savir-Baruch B, Gayed IW, Almaguel F, Chin B, Pantel AR, Armstrong E, Morley A, Ippisch RC, Flavell RR. JNMT continuing education: 177Lu PSMA therapy. J Nucl Med Technol 2022; 50:205-212. [PMID: 36215646 DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.122.263814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiopharmaceutical therapy utilizing 177Lu-PSMA is an effective treatment for prostate cancer which has recently been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration. This method leverages the success of PSMA targeted PET imaging, enabling the delivery of targeted radiopharmaceutical therapy, This agent has demonstrated a clear benefit in large prospective clinical trials, and promises to become part of the standard armamentarium of treatment for patients with prostate cancer. In this review, the evidence supporting the use of this agent is highlighted, along with important areas now under investigation. Practical information on technology aspects, dose administration, nursing, and the role of the treating physician is highlighted. Overall, 177Lu-PSMA treatment requires close collaboration between referring physicians, nuclear medicine, technologists, radiopharmacy, and nursing, to enable streamlined patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Amanda Morley
- University of California, San Francisco, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
49
|
Lutetium-177 DOTATATE: A Practical Review. Pract Radiat Oncol 2022; 12:305-311. [PMID: 35717045 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2022.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that originate in endocrine tissues throughout the body. Though most are indolent, clinical outcomes vary greatly based on histologic differentiation and grade. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic disease refractory to standard of care treatment. The phase III NETTER-1 trial found that [177Lu] Lu-DOTA-[Tyr3]-octreotate improved disease-free survival versus octreotide alone for somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic NETs and had a favorable toxicity profile, leading to Food and Drug Administration approval. [177Lu] Lu-DOTA-[Tyr3]-octreotate is an important new treatment that expands the role of radiation in the treatment of NETs. Several important trials are ongoing to better elucidate the role of this treatment.
Collapse
|
50
|
Soulek DK, Mastascusa NJ, Martin ME, Graves SA. Practical Considerations for Implementation of 177Lu-DOTATATE Neuroendocrine Tumor Treatment Programs. J Nucl Med Technol 2022; 50:jnmt.122.263813. [PMID: 35701215 DOI: 10.2967/jnmt.122.263813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The 2018 FDA approval of 177Lu-DOTATATE for the treatment of somatostatin receptor-positive (SSTR) neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) represents a paradigm shifting approach to cancer treatments around the globe. Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs overexpress the somatostatin subtype receptor 2, which is now exploited for receptor-based imaging and therapy, thus generating significant progress in the diagnosis and treatment of this orphan disease. The recent FDA approval of receptor-based PET radiopharmaceuticals and a new peptide receptor radiopharmaceutical therapy (PRRT), 177Lu-DOTATATE, has dramatically impacted NET patient management. The focus of this paper is to review clinical considerations associated with implementing a 177Lu-DOTATATE program. We review receptor-based NET radiopharmaceuticals, 177Lu-DOTATATE patient selection criteria, administration methods, clinical, regulatory, and radiation safety considerations, technical factors, tissue dosimetry, and reimbursement guidelines.
Collapse
|