Treatment Monitoring of Immunotherapy and Targeted Therapy Using 18F-FET PET in Patients with Melanoma and Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: Initial Experiences

Challenges, limitations, and pitfalls of PET and advanced MRI in patients with brain tumors: A report of the PET/RANO group

Brain tumor diagnostics have significantly evolved with the use of positron emission tomography (PET) and advanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques. In addition to anatomical MRI, these modalities may provide valuable information for several clinical applications such as differential diagnosis, delineation of tumor extent, prognostication, differentiation between tumor relapse and treatment-related changes, and the evaluation of response to anticancer therapy. In particular, joint recommendations of the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Group, the European Association of Neuro-oncology, and major European and American Nuclear Medicine societies highlighted that the additional clinical value of radiolabeled amino acids compared to anatomical MRI alone is outstanding and that its widespread clinical use should be supported. For advanced MRI and its steadily increasing use in clinical practice, the Standardization Subcommittee of the Jumpstarting Brain Tumor Drug Development Coalition provided more recently an updated acquisition protocol for the widely used dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MRI. Besides amino acid PET and perfusion MRI, other PET tracers and advanced MRI techniques (e.g. MR spectroscopy) are of considerable clinical interest and are increasingly integrated into everyday clinical practice. Nevertheless, these modalities have shortcomings which should be considered in clinical routine. This comprehensive review provides an overview of potential challenges, limitations, and pitfalls associated with PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques in patients with gliomas or brain metastases. Despite these issues, PET imaging and advanced MRI techniques continue to play an indispensable role in brain tumor management. Acknowledging and mitigating these challenges through interdisciplinary collaboration, standardized protocols, and continuous innovation will further enhance the utility of these modalities in guiding optimal patient care.

MRI and 18F-FET PET for Multimodal Treatment Monitoring in Patients with Brain Metastases: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

PET using the radiolabeled amino acid O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (18F-FET) has been shown to be of value for treatment monitoring in patients with brain metastases after multimodal therapy, especially in clinical situations with equivocal MRI findings. As medical procedures must be justified socioeconomically, we determined the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of 18F-FET PET for treatment monitoring of multimodal therapy, including checkpoint inhibitors, targeted therapies, radiotherapy, and combinations thereof in patients with brain metastases secondary to melanoma or non-small cell lung cancer. Methods: We analyzed already-published clinical data and calculated the associated costs from the German statutory health insurance system perspective. Two clinical scenarios were considered: decision tree model 1 determined the effectiveness of 18F-FET PET alone for identifying treatment-related changes, that is, the probability of correctly identifying patients with treatment-related changes confirmed by neuropathology or clinicoradiographically using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology criteria for immunotherapy. The resulting cost-effectiveness ratio showed the cost for each correctly identified patient with treatment-related changes in whom MRI findings remained inconclusive. Decision tree model 2 calculated the effectiveness of both 18F-FET PET and MRI, that is, the probability of correctly identifying nonresponders to treatment. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated to determine cost-effectiveness, that is, the cost for each additionally identified nonresponder by 18F-FET PET who would have remained undetected by MRI. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses tested the robustness of the results. Results: 18F-FET PET identified 94% of patients with treatment-related changes, resulting in €1,664.23 (€1.00 = $1.08 at time of writing) for each correctly identified patient. Nonresponders were correctly identified in 60% by MRI and in 80% by 18F-FET PET, resulting in €3,292.67 and €3,915.83 for each correctly identified nonresponder by MRI and 18F-FET PET, respectively. The cost to correctly identify 1 additional nonresponder by 18F-FET PET, who would have remained unidentified by MRI, was €5,785.30. Conclusion: Given the considerable annual cost of multimodal therapy, the integration of 18F-FET PET can potentially improve patient care while reducing costs.

Prediction of response to lomustine-based chemotherapy in glioma patients at recurrence using MRI and FET PET

BACKGROUND

We evaluated O-(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET) PET and MRI for early response assessment in recurrent glioma patients treated with lomustine-based chemotherapy.

METHODS

Thirty-six adult patients with WHO CNS grade 3 or 4 gliomas (glioblastoma, 69%) at recurrence (median number of recurrences, 1; range, 1-3) were retrospectively identified. Besides MRI, serial FET PET scans were performed at baseline and early after chemotherapy initiation (not later than two cycles). Tumor-to-brain ratios (TBR), metabolic tumor volumes (MTV), the occurrence of new distant hotspots with a mean TBR >1.6 at follow-up, and the dynamic parameter time-to-peak were derived from all FET PET scans. PET parameter thresholds were defined using ROC analyses to predict PFS of ≥6 months and OS of ≥12 months. MRI response assessment was based on RANO criteria. The predictive values of FET PET parameters and RANO criteria were subsequently evaluated using univariate and multivariate survival estimates.

RESULTS

After treatment initiation, the median follow-up time was 11 months (range, 3-71 months). Relative changes of TBR, MTV, and RANO criteria predicted a significantly longer PFS (all P ≤ .002) and OS (all P ≤ .045). At follow-up, the occurrence of new distant hotspots (n ≥ 1) predicted a worse outcome, with significantly shorter PFS (P = .005) and OS (P < .001). Time-to-peak changes did not predict a significantly longer survival. Multivariate survival analyses revealed that new distant hotspots at follow-up FET PET were most potent in predicting non-response (P < .001; HR, 8.578).

CONCLUSIONS

Data suggest that FET PET provides complementary information to RANO criteria for response evaluation of lomustine-based chemotherapy early after treatment initiation.

Amino Acid PET in Neurooncology

For decades, several amino acid PET tracers have been used to optimize diagnostics in patients with brain tumors. In clinical routine, the most important clinical indications for amino acid PET in brain tumor patients are differentiation of neoplasm from nonneoplastic etiologies, delineation of tumor extent for further diagnostic and treatment planning (i.e., diagnostic biopsy, resection, or radiotherapy), differentiation of treatment-related changes such as pseudoprogression or radiation necrosis after radiation or chemoradiation from tumor progression at follow-up, and assessment of response to anticancer therapy, including prediction of patient outcome. This continuing education article addresses the diagnostic value of amino acid PET for patients with either glioblastoma or metastatic brain cancer.

The radiological appearances of lung cancer treated with immunotherapy

Therapy and prognosis of several solid and hematologic malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), have been favourably impacted by the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Their mechanism of action relies on the principle that some cancers can evade immune surveillance by expressing surface inhibitor molecules, known as "immune checkpoints". ICIs aim to conceal tumoural checkpoints on the cell surface and reinvigorate the ability of the host immune system to recognize tumour cells, triggering an antitumoural immune response.In this review, we will focus on the imaging patterns of different responses occurring in patients treated by ICIs. We will also discuss imaging findings of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), along with current and future perspectives of metabolic imaging. Finally, we will explore the role of radiomics in the setting of ICI-treated patients.

Skin Cancer Pathobiology at a Glance: A Focus on Imaging Techniques and Their Potential for Improved Diagnosis and Surveillance in Clinical Cohorts

Early diagnosis is essential for completely eradicating skin cancer and maximizing patients' clinical benefits. Emerging optical imaging modalities such as reflectance confocal microscopy (RCM), optical coherence tomography (OCT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), near-infrared (NIR) bioimaging, positron emission tomography (PET), and their combinations provide non-invasive imaging data that may help in the early detection of cutaneous tumors and surgical planning. Hence, they seem appropriate for observing dynamic processes such as blood flow, immune cell activation, and tumor energy metabolism, which may be relevant for disease evolution. This review discusses the latest technological and methodological advances in imaging techniques that may be applied for skin cancer detection and monitoring. In the first instance, we will describe the principle and prospective clinical applications of the most commonly used imaging techniques, highlighting the challenges and opportunities of their implementation in the clinical setting. We will also highlight how imaging techniques may complement the molecular and histological approaches in sharpening the non-invasive skin characterization, laying the ground for more personalized approaches in skin cancer patients.

18F-FET-PET imaging in high-grade gliomas and brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To provide a summary of the diagnostic performance of ¹⁸F-FET-PET in the management of patients with high-grade brain gliomas or metastases from extracranial primary malignancies.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases were searched for studies that reported on diagnostic test parameters in radiotherapy planning, response assessment, and tumour recurrence/treatment-related changes differentiation. Radiomic studies were excluded. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool and the GRADE approach. A bivariate, random-effects model was used to produce summary estimates of sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies with a total of 1206 patients/lesions were included in the analysis. For radiotherapy planning of glioma, the pooled proportion of patients from 3 studies with ¹⁸F-FET uptake extending beyond the 20 mm margin from the gadolinium enhancement on standard MRI was 39% (95% CI, 10-73%). In 3 studies, ¹⁸F-FET-PET was also shown to be predictive of early responders to treatment, whereas MRI failed to show any prognostic value. For the differentiation of glioma recurrence from treatment-related changes, the pooled sensitivity and specificity of TBR_max 1.9-2.3 from 6 studies were 91% (95% CI, 74-97%) and 84% (95% CI, 69-93%), respectively. The respective values for brain metastases from 4 studies were 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) and 82% (95% CI, 74-88%) using TBR_max 2.15-3.11.

CONCLUSION

While ¹⁸F-FET shows promise as a complementary modality to standard-of-care MRI for the management of primary and metastatic brain malignancies, further validation with standardized image interpretation methods in well-designed prospective studies are warranted.

Advantages of FBPA PET in evaluating early response of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice: Comparison to FDG PET

Purpose

PET with L-4-borono-2-[18F] fluoro-phenylalanine (FBPA) was reported to be useful to differentiate malignant tumors and inflammation. Although immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been applied to cancer treatment recently, FDG PET may not be suitable to determine the effect of ICIs because of false-positive findings caused by treatment-related inflammation. In this study, we aimed to demonstrate that FBPA PET allowed detection of the early response of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in tumor-bearing mice, comparing the results with those of FDG PET.

Materials and methods

Mice with B16F10 melanoma tumor xenografts were prepared. Anti-mouse PD-1 antibody or PBS was administered twice intraperitoneally to the tumor-bearing mice on Day 0 (3 days after inoculation) and Day 5 (treatment or control group ). PET/CT imaging was performed twice for each mouse on Day 0 before the anti-PD-1 antibody/PBS administration and on Day 7 using a micro-PET/CT scanner. FBPA and FDG PET/CT studies were conducted separately. SUVmax and the tumor to liver ratio (T/L ratio) were used as parameters exhibiting tumor activity. Tumor uptake volume (TUV) and metabolic tumor volume (MTV) were also calculated for FBPA and FDG, respectively. Changes between pre- and posttreatment SUVmax or T/L ratio were observed using the formula as follows: [(posttreatment parameter values/pretreatment values - 1) × 100] (%).

Results

Tumors in TrG were smaller than those in CoG on Day 7. SUVmax and T/L ratio represented no differences between TrG and CoG in FBPA and FDG PET before treatment. FBPA PET on Day 7 demonstrated that SUVmax, T/L ratio, and TUV in TrG were statistically smaller than those in CoG. %T/L ratio and %SUVmax exhibited the same trend in FBPA PET. However, FDG PET on Day 7 revealed no differences in all parameters between TrG and CoG. T/L ratio and %SUVmax in TrG represented larger values than those in CoG without statistical significances.

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that FBPA PET allowed detection of the early response of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in B16F10 melanoma-bearing mice. FDG PET did not detect the response. Further studies are required to determine whether FBPA PET is useful in evaluating the treatment effect of ICIs in humans.

The value of stereotactic biopsy of primary and recurrent brain metastases in the era of precision medicine

Background

Brain metastases (BM) represent the most frequent intracranial tumors with increasing incidence. Many primary tumors are currently treated in protocols that incorporate targeted therapies either upfront or for progressive metastatic disease. Hence, molecular markers are gaining increasing importance in the diagnostic framework of BM. In cases with diagnostic uncertainty, both in newly diagnosed or recurrent BM, stereotactic biopsy serves as an alternative to microsurgical resection particularly whenever resection is not deemed to be safe or feasible. This retrospective study aimed to analyze both diagnostic yield and safety of an image-guided frame based stereotactic biopsy technique (STX).

Material and methods

Our institutional neurosurgical data base was searched for any surgical procedure for suspected brain metastases between January 2016 and March 2021. Of these, only patients with STX were included. Clinical parameters, procedural complications, and tissue histology and concomitant molecular signature were assessed.

Results

Overall, 467 patients were identified including 234 (50%) with STX. Median age at biopsy was 64 years (range 29 - 87 years). MRI was used for frame-based trajectory planning in every case with additional PET-guidance in 38 cases (16%). In total, serial tumor probes provided a definite diagnosis in 230 procedures (98%). In 4 cases (1.7%), the pathological tissue did not allow a definitive neuropathological diagnosis. 24 cases had to be excluded due to non-metastatic histology, leaving 206 cases for further analyses. 114 patients (49%) exhibited newly diagnosed BM, while 46 patients (20%) displayed progressive BM. Pseudoprogression was seen in 46 patients, a median of 12 months after prior therapy. Pseudoprogression was always confirmed by clinical course. Metastatic tissue was found most frequently from lung cancer (40%), followed by breast cancer (9%), and malignant melanoma (7%). Other entities included gastrointestinal cancer, squamous cell cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and thyroid cancer, respectively. In 9 cases (4%), the tumor origin could not be identified (cancer of unknown primary). Molecular genetic analyses were successful in 137 out of 144 analyzed cases (95%). Additional next-generation sequencing revealed conclusive results in 12/18 (67%) cases. Relevant peri-procedural complications were observed in 5 cases (2.4%), which were all transient. No permanent morbidity or mortality was noted.

Conclusion

In patients with BM, frame-based stereotactic biopsy constitutes a safe procedure with a high diagnostic yield. Importantly, this extended to discerning pseudoprogression from tumor relapse after prior therapy. Thus, comprehensive molecular characterization based on minimal-invasive stereotactic biopsies lays the foundation for precision medicine approaches in the treatment of primary and recurrent BM.

An updated review on the diagnosis and assessment of post-treatment relapse in brain metastases using PET

INTRODUCTION

Brain metastases in patients with extracranial cancer are typically associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Stereotactic radiotherapy and immunotherapy using checkpoint inhibitors currently are essential in brain metastases treatment. Since conventional contrast-enhanced MRI alone cannot reliably differentiate between treatment-induced changes and brain metastasis relapse, several studies investigated the role of PET imaging and, more recently, radiomics, based on routinely acquired PET images, to overcome this clinically relevant challenge.

AREAS COVERED

The current literature on PET imaging, including radiomics, in patients with brain metastases, focusing on the diagnosis and assessment of post-treatment relapse, is summarized.

EXPERT OPINION

Available data suggest that imaging parameters, including radiomics features, mainly derived from amino acid PET, are helpful for diagnosis and assessment of post-treatment relapse in patients with brain metastases.

Tumor response assessment on imaging following immunotherapy

In recent years, various systemic immunotherapies have been developed for cancer treatment, such as monoclonal antibodies (mABs) directed against immune checkpoints (immune checkpoint inhibitors, ICIs), oncolytic viruses, cytokines, cancer vaccines, and adoptive cell transfer. While being estimated to be eligible in 38.5% of patients with metastatic solid or hematological tumors, ICIs, in particular, demonstrate durable disease control across many oncologic diseases (e.g., in melanoma, lung, bladder, renal, head, and neck cancers) and overall survival benefits. Due to their unique mechanisms of action based on T-cell activation, response to immunotherapies is characterized by different patterns, such as progression prior to treatment response (pseudoprogression), hyperprogression, and dissociated responses following treatment. Because these features are not encountered in the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1), which is the standard for response assessment in oncology, new criteria were defined for immunotherapies. The most important changes in these new morphologic criteria are, firstly, the requirement for confirmatory imaging examinations in case of progression, and secondly, the appearance of new lesions is not necessarily considered a progressive disease. Until today, five morphologic (immune-related response criteria (irRC), immune-related RECIST (irRECIST), immune RECIST (iRECIST), immune-modified RECIST (imRECIST), and intra-tumoral RECIST (itRECIST)) criteria have been developed to accurately assess changes in target lesion sizes, taking into account the specific response patterns after immunotherapy. In addition to morphologic response criteria, 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) is a promising option for metabolic response assessment and four metabolic criteria are used (PET/CT Criteria for Early Prediction of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy (PECRIT), PET Response Evaluation Criteria for Immunotherapy (PERCIMT), immunotherapy-modified PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (imPERCIST5), and immune PERCIST (iPERCIST)). Besides, there is evidence that parameters on 18F-FDG-PET/CT, such as the standardized uptake value (SUV)max and several radiotracers, e.g., directed against PD-L1, may be potential imaging biomarkers of response. Moreover, the emerge of human intratumoral immunotherapy (HIT-IT), characterized by the direct injection of immunostimulatory agents into a tumor lesion, has given new importance to imaging assessment. This article reviews the specific imaging patterns of tumor response and progression and available imaging response criteria following immunotherapy.

Investigational PET tracers in neuro-oncology-What's on the horizon? A report of the PET/RANO group

Many studies in patients with brain tumors evaluating innovative PET tracers have been published in recent years, and the initial results are promising. Here, the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) PET working group provides an overview of the literature on novel investigational PET tracers for brain tumor patients. Furthermore, newer indications of more established PET tracers for the evaluation of glucose metabolism, amino acid transport, hypoxia, cell proliferation, and others are also discussed. Based on the preliminary findings, these novel investigational PET tracers should be further evaluated considering their promising potential. In particular, novel PET probes for imaging of translocator protein and somatostatin receptor overexpression as well as for immune system reactions appear to be of additional clinical value for tumor delineation and therapy monitoring. Progress in developing these radiotracers may contribute to improving brain tumor diagnostics and advancing clinical translational research.

PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncology: An Update and Overview of a Rapidly Growing Area

Simple Summary

Positron emission tomography (PET) is a functional imaging technique which plays an increasingly important role in the management of brain tumors. Owing different radiotracers, PET allows to image different metabolic aspects of the brain tumors. This review outlines currently available PET radiotracers and their respective indications in neuro-oncology. It specifically focuses on the investigation of gliomas, meningiomas, primary central nervous system lymphomas as well as brain metastases. Recent advances in the production of PET radiotracers, image analyses and translational applications to peptide radionuclide receptor therapy, which allow to treat brain tumors with radiotracers, are also discussed. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of PET imaging’s potential in neuro-oncology as an adjunct to brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Abstract

PET plays an increasingly important role in the management of brain tumors. This review outlines currently available PET radiotracers and their respective indications. It specifically focuses on ¹⁸F-FDG, amino acid and somatostatin receptor radiotracers, for imaging gliomas, meningiomas, primary central nervous system lymphomas as well as brain metastases. Recent advances in radiopharmaceuticals, image analyses and translational applications to therapy are also discussed. The objective of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview of PET imaging’s potential in neuro-oncology as an adjunct to brain MRI for all medical professionals implicated in brain tumor diagnosis and care.

Brain metastases: the role of clinical imaging

Imaging of brain metastases (BMs) has advanced greatly over the past decade. In this review, we discuss the main challenges that BMs pose in clinical practice and describe the role of imaging.Firstly, we describe the increased incidence of BMs of different primary tumours and the rationale for screening. A challenge lies in selecting the right patients for screening: not all cancer patients develop BMs in their disease course.Secondly, we discuss the imaging techniques to detect BMs. A three-dimensional (3D) T1W MRI sequence is the golden standard for BM detection, but additional anatomical (susceptibility weighted imaging, diffusion weighted imaging), functional (perfusion MRI) and metabolic (MR spectroscopy, positron emission tomography) information can help to differentiate BMs from other intracranial aetiologies.Thirdly, we describe the role of imaging before, during and after treatment of BMs. For surgical resection, imaging is used to select surgical patients, but also to assist intraoperatively (neuronavigation, fluorescence-guided surgery, ultrasound). For treatment planning of stereotactic radiosurgery, MRI is combined with CT. For surveillance after both local and systemic therapies, conventional MRI is used. However, advanced imaging is increasingly performed to distinguish true tumour progression from pseudoprogression.FInally, future perspectives are discussed, including radiomics, new biomarkers, new endogenous contrast agents and theranostics.

Negative 18F-FET PET/CT in brain metastasis recurrence: a teaching case report

Positron emission tomography (PET) using O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (¹⁸F-FET) PET has been shown to be a useful tool for differentiating radiation therapy outcomes, such as brain metastasis recurrence or radiation necrosis. We present the case of a female patient with brain metastases from pulmonary mucinous adenocarcinoma with suspicion of tumor recurrence on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) after radiosurgery. ¹⁸F-FET PET/computed tomography (CT) was indicative of radiation necrosis. Due to the patient's medical history and the discrepancy between the brain MRI and PET/CT results, surgical biopsies were decided, which were positive for brain metastasis recurrence. The diagnosis of metastasis recurrence may also be challenging on ¹⁸F-FET PET/CT. In case of discrepancies between MRI and PET/CT results, false-negative ¹⁸F-FET PET/CT remains a possibility and requires careful follow-up or biopsy.

The Role of the Immune Response in Brain Metastases: Novel Imaging Biomarkers for Immunotherapy

Brain metastases are a major clinical problem, and immunotherapy offers a novel treatment paradigm with the potential to synergize with existing focal therapies like surgery and radiosurgery or even replace them in future. The brain is a unique microenvironment structurally and immunologically. The immune response is likely to be crucial to the adaptation of systemic immune modulating agents against this disease. Imaging is frequently employed in the clinical diagnosis and management of brain metastasis, so it is logical that brain imaging techniques are investigated as a source of biomarkers of the immune response in these tumors. Current imaging techniques in clinical use include structural MRI (post-contrast T1W sequences, T2, and FLAIR), physiological sequences (perfusion- and diffusion-weighted imaging), and molecular imaging (MR spectroscopy and PET). These are reviewed for their application to predicting and measuring the response to immunotherapy in brain metastases.

The evolving role of neurosurgery for central nervous system metastases in the era of personalized cancer therapy

Recent therapeutic advances involving the use of systemic targeted treatments and immunotherapeutic agents in patients with advanced cancers have translated into improved survival rates. Despite the emergence of such promising pharmacological therapies and extended survival, the frequency of metastases in the central nervous system has steadily increased. Effective medical and surgical therapies are available for many patients with brain metastases and need to be incorporated into multi-disciplinary care protocols. The role of neurosurgeons is evolving within these multi-disciplinary care teams. Surgical resection of brain metastases can provide immediate relief from neurological symptoms due to large lesions and provides the histopathological diagnosis in cases of no known primary malignancy. In situations where immunotherapy is part of the oncological treatment plan, surgery may be proposed for expeditious relief of edema to remove the need for steroids. In patients with multiple brain metastases and mixed response to therapeutics or radiosurgery, tumour resampling allows tissue analysis for druggable targets or to distinguish radiation effects from progression. Ventriculo-peritoneal shunting may improve quality of life in patients with hydrocephalus associated with leptomeningeal tumour dissemination and may allow for time to administer more therapy thus prolonging overall survival. Addressing the limited efficacy of many oncological drugs for brain metastases due to insufficient blood-brain barrier penetrance, clinical trial protocols in which surgical specimens are analysed after pre-surgical administration of therapeutics offer pharmacodynamic insights. Comprehensive neurosurgical assessment remains an integral element of multi-disciplinary oncological care of patients with brain metastases and is integral to tumour biology research and therapeutic advancement.

A phase I trial of sorafenib with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) in breast cancer patients with brain metastases and a correlative study of FLT-PET brain imaging

PURPOSE

Sorafenib has demonstrated anti-tumor efficacy and radiosensitizing activity preclinically and in breast cancer. We examined sorafenib in combination with whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and explored the [18F] 3'deoxy-3'-fluorothymidine (FLT)-PET as a novel brain imaging modality in breast cancer brain metastases.

METHODS

A phase I trial of WBRT + sorafenib was conducted using a 3 + 3 design with safety-expansion cohort. Sorafenib was given daily at the start of WBRT for 21 days. The primary endpoints were to determine a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and to evaluate safety and toxicity. The secondary endpoint was CNS progression-free survival (CNS-PFS). MacDonald Criteria were used for response assessment with a correlative serial FLT-PET imaging study.

RESULTS

13 pts were evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). DLTs were grade 4 increased lipase at 200 mg (n = 1) and grade 3 rash at 400 mg (n = 3). The MTD was 200 mg. The overall response rate was 71%. Median CNS-PFS was 12.8 months (95%CI: 6.7-NR). A total of 15 pts (10 WBRT + sorafenib and 5 WBRT) were enrolled in the FLT-PET study: baseline (n = 15), 7-10 days post WBRT (FU1, n = 14), and an additional 12 week (n = 9). A decline in average SUV_max of ≥ 25% was seen in 9/10 (90%) of WBRT + sorafenib patients and 2/4 (50%) of WBRT only patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent WBRT and sorafenib appear safe at 200 mg daily dose with clinical activity. CNS response was favorable compared to historical controls. This combination should be considered for further efficacy evaluation. FLT-PET may be useful as an early response imaging tool for brain metastases.

TRIAL AND CLINICAL REGISTRY

Trial registration numbers and dates: NCT01724606 (November 12, 2012) and NCT01621906 (June 18, 2012).

Diagnosis of Pseudoprogression Following Lomustine-Temozolomide Chemoradiation in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma Patients Using FET-PET

PURPOSE

The CeTeG/NOA-09 phase III trial demonstrated a significant survival benefit of lomustine-temozolomide chemoradiation in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with methylated O⁶-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter. Following lomustine-temozolomide chemoradiation, late and prolonged pseudoprogression may occur. We here evaluated the value of amino acid PET using O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-l-tyrosine (FET) for differentiating pseudoprogression from tumor progression.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We retrospectively identified patients (i) who were treated off-study according to the CeTeG/NOA-09 protocol, (ii) had equivocal MRI findings after radiotherapy, and (iii) underwent additional FET-PET imaging for diagnostic evaluation (number of scans, 1-3). Maximum and mean tumor-to-brain ratios (TBR_max, TBR_mean) and dynamic FET uptake parameters (e.g., time-to-peak) were calculated. In patients with more than one FET-PET scan, relative changes of TBR values were evaluated, that is, an increase or decrease of >10% compared with the reference scan was considered as tumor progression or pseudoprogression. Diagnostic performances were evaluated using ROC curve analyses and Fisher exact test. Diagnoses were confirmed histologically or clinicoradiologically.

RESULTS

We identified 23 patients with 32 FET-PET scans. Within 5-25 weeks after radiotherapy (median time, 9 weeks), pseudoprogression occurred in 11 patients (48%). The parameter TBR_mean calculated from the FET-PET performed 10 ± 7 days after the equivocal MRI showed the highest accuracy (87%) to identify pseudoprogression (threshold, <1.95; P = 0.029). The integration of relative changes of TBR_mean further improved the accuracy (91%; P < 0.001). Moreover, the combination of static and dynamic parameters increased the specificity to 100% (P = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

The data suggest that FET-PET parameters are of significant clinical value to diagnose pseudoprogression related to lomustine-temozolomide chemoradiation.

Use of PET Imaging in Neuro-Oncological Surgery

Simple Summary

The use of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging in neuro-oncological surgery is an exciting field with thriving perspectives. Increasing evidence exists for amino acid-based PET to facilitate interpretation of imaging findings following therapeutic interventions in patients with glioma and brain metastases. In meningioma patients, radiolabeled somatostatin receptor ligands provide an improved tumor tissue visualization in lesions located in the vicinity of the skull base and differentiate between scar tissue and tumor recurrence. Moreover, they can be applied as an individual treatment option in recurrent atypical and anaplastic meningioma not eligible for further surgery and radiotherapy. With a focus on its clinical application, this review provides an overview of the emerging field of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery.

Abstract

This review provides an overview of current applications and perspectives of PET imaging in neuro-oncological surgery. The past and future of PET imaging in the management of patients with glioma and brain metastases are elucidated with an emphasis on amino acid tracers, such as O-(2-[¹⁸F]fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine (¹⁸F-FET). The thematic scope includes surgical resection planning, prognostication, non-invasive prediction of molecular tumor characteristics, depiction of intratumoral heterogeneity, response assessment, differentiation between tumor progression and treatment-related changes, and emerging new tracers. Furthermore, the role of PET using specific somatostatin receptor ligands for the management of patients with meningioma is discussed. Further advances in neuro-oncological imaging can be expected from promising new techniques, such as hybrid PET/MR scanners and the implementation of artificial intelligence methods, such as radiomics.

[Brain metastases-Interdisciplinary approach towards a personalized treatment]

The incidence, treatment and prognosis of patients with brain metastases have substantially changed during the last decades. While the survival time after diagnosis of cerebral metastases was on average a maximum of 3-6 months only 10 years ago, the survival time could be significantly improved due to novel surgical, radiotherapeutic and systemic treatment modalities. Only a few years ago, the occurrence of brain metastases led to a withdrawal from systemic oncological treatment and the exclusion of drug therapy studies and to a purely palliatively oriented treatment in the sense of whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) with or without surgery. The increasing availability of targeted and immunomodulatory drugs as well as adapted radio-oncological procedures enable increasingly more personalized treatment approaches. The aim of this review article is to demonstrate the progress and complexity of the treatment of brain metastases in the context of modern comprehensive interdisciplinary concepts.