The PRIMARY Score: Using intra-prostatic PSMA PET/CT patterns to optimise prostate cancer diagnosis

Discordance between prostate MRI and PSMA-PET/CT: the next big challenge for primary prostate tumor assessment?

OBJECTIVES

An increasing number of patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergo assessment with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT). This offers comprehensive multimodality staging but can lead to discrepancies. The objective was to assess the rates and types of discordance between MRI and PSMA-PET/CT for primary PCa assessment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive men diagnosed with intermediate and high-risk PCa who underwent MRI and PSMA-PET/CT in 2021-2023 were retrospectively included. MRI and PSMA-PET/CT were interpreted using PI-RADS v2.1 and PRIMARY scores. Discordances between the two imaging modalities were categorized as "minor" (larger or additional lesion seen on one modality) or "major" (positive on only one modality or different index lesions between MRI and PSMA-PET/CT) and reconciled using radical prostatectomy or biopsy specimens.

RESULTS

Three hundred and nine men (median age 69 years, interquartile range (IQR) 64-75) were included. Most had Gleason Grade Group ≥ 3 PCa (70.9% (219/309)). Median PSA was 9.0 ng/mL (IQR 5.6-13.6). MRI and PSMA-PET/CT were concordant in 157/309 (50.8%) and discordant in 152/309 (49.1%) patients; with 39/152 (25.7%) major and 113/152 (74.3%) minor discordances. Of 27 patients with lesions only seen on MRI, 85.2% (23/27) were clinically significant PCa (csPCa). Of 23 patients with lesions only seen on PSMA-PET/CT, 78.3% (18/23) were csPCa. Altogether, lesions seen on only one modality were csPCa in 80.0% (36/45).

CONCLUSION

MRI and PSMA-PET/CT were discordant in half of patients for primary PCa evaluation, with major discrepancies seen in roughly one out of eight patients.

KEY POINTS

Question While both MRI and PSMA-PET/CT can be used for primary tumor assessment, the discordances between them are not well established. Findings MRI and PSMA-PET/CT were discordant in about half of the patients. Most prostate lesions seen on only one modality were significant cancer. Clinical relevance MRI and PSMA-PET/CT are often discordant for assessing the primary prostate tumor. Using both modalities for primary prostate tumor evaluation can provide complementary information that may substantially impact treatment planning.

Comparison of mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT in the Assessment of the Primary Tumors in Predominant Low-/Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer

While multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is known to be a specific and reliable modality for the diagnosis of non-metastatic prostate cancer (PC), positron emission tomography (PET) using 68Ga labeled ligands targeting the prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is known for its reliable detection of prostate cancer, being the most sensitive modality for the assessment of the extra-prostatic extension of the disease and the establishment of a diagnosis, even before biopsy. Background/Objectives: Here, we compared these modalities in regards to the localization of intraprostatic cancer lesions prior to local HDR brachytherapy. Methods: A cohort of 27 patients received both mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT. Based on 24 intraprostatic segments, two readers each scored the risk of tumor-like alteration in each imaging modality. The detectability was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. The histopathological findings from biopsy were used as the gold standard in each segment. In addition, we applied a patient-based "congruence" concept to quantify the interobserver and intermodality agreement. Results: For the ROC analysis, we included 447 segments (19 patients), with their respective histological references. The two readers of the MRI reached an AUC of 0.770 and 0.781, respectively, with no significant difference (p = 0.75). The PET/CT readers reached an AUC of 0.684 and 0.608, respectively, with a significant difference (p < 0.001). The segment-wise intermodality comparison showed a significant superiority of MRI (AUC = 0.815) compared to PET/CT (AUC = 0.690) (p = 0.006). Via a patient-based analysis, a superiority of MRI in terms of relative agreement with the biopsy result was observed (n = 19 patients). We found congruence scores of 83% (MRI) and 76% (PET/CT, p = 0.034), respectively. Using an adjusted "near total agreement" score (adjacent segments with positive scores of 4 or 5 counted as congruent), we found an increase in the agreement, with a score of 96.5% for MRI and 92.7% for PET/CT, with significant difference (p = 0.024). Conclusions: This study suggests that in a small collective of low-/intermediate risk prostate cancer, mpMRI is superior for the detection of intraprostatic lesions as compared to PSMA-PET/CT. We also found a higher relative agreement between MRI and biopsy as compared to that for PET/CT. However, further studies including a larger number of patients and readers are necessary to draw solid conclusions.

PSMA PET Imaging in the Management of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Treated with Radioligand Therapy

Despite an evolving treatment landscape for people with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, prognosis for this patient population remains poor. Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) imaging may be used to identify patients with PSMA-positive (and no significant PSMA-negative) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who could benefit from PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy. As the PSMA PET imaging and treatment landscape expands, there is a growing need for guidance and greater utilization of PSMA-targeted tracers and radioligand therapies to improve outcomes for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. This review discusses the current clinical considerations of PSMA PET, including the various imaging agents available and how best to identify patients eligible for PSMA PET imaging and subsequent PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy. This review also examines opportunities to mitigate discordant findings, as well as considerations around the standardization of reporting of PSMA PET imaging, key gaps in the evidence base, and guidance around the use of PSMA PET in clinical and research settings.

Physiological Zonal Anatomical Variation and Distribution of PSMA Activity Within the Prostate on PSMA PET: A Study of 93 Prostatectomy Specimens Correlated to MRI and Histology

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to describe and quantify the normal physiologic zonal variation of PSMA expression within the prostate gland on 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA-PET imaging with histopathologic correlation, to aid in the accurate diagnosis of central zone (CZ) lesions. We also aim to quantify a normal range of CZ avidity and identify normal cut-off values below which CZ uptake can be safely considered physiologic.

METHOD

Prostate MR and 18F-DCFPyL-PSMA-PET imaging studies were assessed along with the review of histopathology for 93 consecutive patients who underwent radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Prostate MR and PSMA PET data sets were fused with standardised volumes of interest (VOI) placed on each zone (CZ, PZ & TZ) bilaterally based on MR T2 sequence prostate zonal anatomy. SUVmax and SUVmean values for each VOI were measured. Semi-quantitative histopathological correlation was performed for ten selected cases. The CZ, TZ and PZ in each sample were assessed for PSMA receptor density and graded by staining intensity and the percentage of cells staining with this level of intensity.

RESULTS

A higher intensity of PSMA uptake was seen with respect to both SUVmax and SUVmean in the CZ compared to both the PZ and TZ. Histological analysis also provided concordant results, providing direct cellular surface correlation to the imaging findings.

CONCLUSION

Increased physiological PSMA expression (and thus molecular PSMA intensity) on PET/CT was seen in the CZ. This knowledge will improve confidence during interpretation of intra-prostatic findings on staging or restaging PSMA PET/CT studies.

The predictive value of multiparametric MRI combined with [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for the pathological upgrade in prostate cancer: a multicenter study

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop a predictive model that integrates parameters derived from preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT for reliably predicting pathological upgrading from systematic biopsy (SB) to radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens.

METHODS

We ultimately retrospectively analyzed 163 patients with biopsy-confirmed localized prostate cancer (PCa) who underwent preoperative mpMRI and [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans between January 2019 and June 2022. Clinical and imaging characteristics were compared between patients with and without pathological upgrading. Predictive factors for pathological upgrading were evaluated through univariate and multivariable analyses. Predictive models were constructed based on the identified parameters. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were utilized to determine optimal cutoff values and to evaluate model performance. Additionally, patients from two external centers were selected as a validation cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 55 (33.7%) cases experienced pathological upgrading. Multivariate analysis revealed that ADCmean - ADCmin (P = 0.035); SUVmax (P = 0.003); highest tumor grade at SB, ISUP grade group (ISUP GG) 1 vs. 2 (P = 0.001), ISUP GG 1 vs. 3 (P < 0.001), ISUP GG 1 vs. 4 (P < 0.001); and multifocality on [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT (P = 0.007) were independent predictors for pathological upgrading. The combined model achieved an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.803 (95% CI: 0.734 to 0.861), indicating robust discriminative power. External validation confirmed the model's reliability and predictive ability.

CONCLUSION

Our predictive model, integrating mpMRI and [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT parameters, effectively forecasts pathological upgrading in PCa, allowing for more precise treatment risk stratification.

Prevalence and Medium-Term Outcomes of Patients with Biopsy-Proven Intermediate- to High-Risk Prostate Adenocarcinoma with Low Intraprostatic Uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in the proPSMA Study

The current prevalence of low intraprostatic uptake for staging prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET ranges between 4.4% and 17% in retrospective studies. We aimed to define the prevalence and describe the outcomes of patients with low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT in the prospective proPSMA study. Methods: We identified patients with an SUVmax of 4 or less on PSMA PET/CT in the proPSMA study. Patients were followed up until 42 mo after randomization. The PRIMARY score was evaluated by 3 nuclear medicine physicians, with the result determined by consensus. Treatment failure was defined as new metastatic disease, biochemical recurrence, or initiation of salvage therapy. Results: Ten of 302 (3.3%; 95% CI, 1.6%-6.0%) patients had low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT and normal findings on conventional imaging (CT and whole-body bone scanning). The median age was 66 y (interquartile range, 60.5-70.3 y). International Society of Urological Pathologists biopsy grade group was 3 in 5 patients and 5 in 5 patients, with no atypical histology identified. The median prostate-specific antigen level was 5.1 ng/nL (interquartile range, 2.3-8.3 ng/nL). The median follow-up interval was 30 mo (interquartile range, 24-39 mo). Multiparametric MRI was performed on 5 patients, with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score 5 in 2 patients, 4 in 1 patient, and 2 in 2 patients. The PRIMARY score was positive in 5 of 10 (50%) patients. Five (50%), 4 (30%), and 2 (20%) of 10 patients received radical prostatectomy, definitive radiotherapy, and androgen deprivation therapy alone, respectively. Of the 9 (90%) patients who received definitive treatment, 1 (11%) experienced treatment failure at 18 mo after radical prostatectomy and received metastasis-directed therapy. Biochemical recurrence was nonevaluable in the single patient who received androgen deprivation therapy alone. At the 42-mo follow-up after randomization, 4 of 9 (44%) patients who received definitive therapy remained on trial-none of whom had evidence of treatment failure. No other patients had new metastatic disease or initiation of salvage therapy during follow-up. Conclusion: In the proPSMA trial, there was a low prevalence (3.3%) of low intraprostatic uptake on PSMA PET/CT in patients with biopsy-confirmed prostate cancer, and treatment failure was infrequent.

Which patients with negative PSMA-PET imaging can safely avoid biopsy for prostate cancer? a novel step towards PSMA-based biopsy-free strategy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify if a subset of men can safely avoid or delay prostate biopsy based on negative results of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Among 341 consecutive cases in a prospective biopsy cohort (NCT05073653), 111 treatment-naïve men with negative PSMA-PET (PRIMARY-score 1/2) were included. All participants underwent PSMA-PET and histopathological examinations. Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2. Multivariate logistic regression was employed to identify predictors of non-csPCa. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to detect non-csPCa on prostate pathology. PSMA-postive patients were additionally reviewed to assess the imaging and pathological outcomes.

RESULTS

Younger age was identified as an independent predictor (P = 0.006) for the absence of csPCa. ROC analysis of csPCa revealed the largest areas under the curve of 0.77 (0.67-0.87) and 0.78 (0.68-0.88) for individual age in the entire PSMA-negative cohort and the MRI subset, respectively (both P < 0.001). The negative predictive value (NPV) of PSMA-PET for csPCa detection improved with a decreasing age, from 88% in all, to 98% in men aged under 65 yrs (98% vs. 88%, P = 0.021), and to 100% in men aged under 60 yrs (100% vs. 88%, P = 0.040). The NPV of PSMA-PET improved from 88 to 94% when combined with negative MRI, and to 100% in men with negative MRI and aged under 65 yrs. The prevalence was 57% for csPCa and 65% for PCa of any grade.

CONCLUSION

We preliminarily propose that omission or postponement of prostate biopsy should be considered for men under the age of 65 yrs with negative PSMA-PET scored as PRIMARY 1 or 2. Conversely, prostate biopsy might be considered in biopsy-naïve men aged 65 yrs or older with strong clinical suspicion of PCa, despite negative PSMA-PET. Further prospective and external evaluation is needed to prove the robustness of this novel strategy.

PRIMARY scoring in 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT: correlation with prostate cancer risk groups and its potential impact on active surveillance

OBJECTIVE

The PRIMARY scoring system is a scale designed to identify clinically significant intraprostatic malignancies on 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT images. Active surveillance is a management method for patients with low-risk prostate cancer. In this study, we aimed to assess the efficacy of PRIMARY scoring in identifying appropriate candidates for active surveillance based on the distribution within prostate cancer risk groups.

METHODS

The data of 134 patients diagnosed with PCa by biopsy who underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging for post-diagnostic staging purposes were retrospectively analyzed. Age, total PSA, ISUP grade, prostate lesion SUVmax values, PI-RADS scores, and PRIMARY scores were recorded. Patients were classified into low-risk and intermediate/high-risk groups.

RESULTS

In the intermediate/high-risk group, the PRIMARY score was 1-2 in 17.6% and 3-5 in 82.4% of patients. In the low-risk group, the PRIMARY score was 1-2 in 34.7% and 3-5 in 65.3% of patients. None of the patients in the low-risk group had a PRIMARY score of 5. The most frequent PRIMARY score in both groups was 4, and there was a significant difference between the average SUVmax values of the intermediate/high and low-risk groups with a PRIMARY score of 4 (p = 0.018). The sensitivity of PRIMARY scoring in detecting patients in the intermediate/high-risk group was 82.3%, the specificity was 34.6%, and the positive predictive value (PPV) was 68.6%. When a cut-off SUVmax value 5.0 was used for the PRIMARY score of 4, the sensitivity was 67.0%, the specificity was 65.3% and the PPV was 77.0%. In the ROC analysis, the area under the curve was 0.727 for PRIMARY scoring, 0.662 for PI-RADS, and 0.744 for their combined mean.

CONCLUSION

The PRIMARY scoring system can complement PI-RADS scoring in mpMRI for selecting patients suitable for active surveillance. Revising the PRIMARY score 4 with an SUVmax cut-off value may increase the specificity.

Prospective comparison of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI with histopathology as the reference standard for intraprostatic tumour detection and T-staging of high-risk prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To prospectively compare the ability of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and whole-body MRI (WBMRI) with DWI to detect prostate cancer (PCa) lesions and assess their local stage. Additionally, to evaluate the correlation between PSMA uptake on PET/CT and PSMA expression as assessed by immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

Men with newly diagnosed unfavourable intermediate or high-risk PCa underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and WBMRI with DWI before robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy. Diagnostic accuracy for intraprostatic tumour localization, seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and extraprostatic extension (EPE) was evaluated using whole-mount prostatectomy specimens as the reference standard. SUVmax was compared with immunohistochemical PSMA staining intensity quantified using QuPath software.

RESULTS

19 patients with 39 intraprostatic lesions in histopathology were included. The overall lesion detection rates for PET/CT were 84.6% and 82.1% for two independent readers, compared to 74.4% and 46.2% for MRI readers. The detection rates of index lesions were 94.7% for PET/CT and 74.0-84.0% for MRI, whereas those of non-index lesions were 70.0-75.0% for PET/CT and 20.0-65.0% for MRI. For detecting EPE, AUC values were 0.500-0.591 for PET/CT and 0.648-0.682 for MRI. For detecting SVI, AUC values ranged from 0.629 to 0.700 across both modalities. SUVmax showed a weak correlation with immunohistochemical expression of PSMA multiplied by lesion diameter (Spearman's ρ = 0.427, p = 0.013). Lesion diameters measured using 30% and 40% of SUVmax, as well as prostate SUVbackground x2, showed the closest agreement with histopathological measurements.

CONCLUSION

18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT demonstrated high sensitivity in localizing intraprostatic carcinoma lesions but seemed inferior to WBMRI in detecting EPE. PSMA uptake appears to depend on both PSMA expression and lesion size. These findings highlight the complementary roles of PET/CT and MRI in the detection and tumor staging of PCa.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov ID: NCT03537391. Registered 25 May 2018.

Development and validation of multivariable biopsy-free nomograms to predict clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with prostate-specific antigen levels ≥20 ng/mL

BACKGROUND

Elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels often lead to prostate biopsies, which can result in overdiagnosis and complications, thereby increasing preoperative anxiety. This study aimed to develop and validate a novel biopsy-free diagnostic nomogram for accurate detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with PSA levels ≥20 ng/mL.

METHODS

The cohort of this retrospective analysis included patients with PSA levels ≥20 ng/mL who underwent evaluation including clinical variables, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), prostate health index (PHI), and prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PSMA PET/CT). Nomogram performance was evaluated using the concordance index, calibration plot, decision curve analysis, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC).

RESULTS

Of 684 patients, 478 and 206 were randomly assigned to the diagnostic and validation cohorts, respectively. Multivariable predictors of csPCa included age, PSA density, PI-RADS, location of suspicious lesion, %PSA variation ratio, and acute urinary retention. The foundational nomogram achieved AUCs of 0.930 and 0.911 for the training and validation sets, respectively. By integrating both PHI and PSMA maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the diagnostic accuracy of the advanced nomogram improved significantly, with AUCs of 0.951 and 0.935 for the training and validation sets, respectively. Limitations included the lack of external validation and potential selection bias.

CONCLUSIONS

The biopsy-free nomogram presents a promising approach for accurate diagnosis of csPCa in patients with PSA levels ≥20 ng/mL. This non-invasive method can reduce unnecessary biopsies and enhance patient care by identifying those necessitating further evaluation and treatment.

PSMA-avid rib lesions in prostate cancer patients: differentiating false positives from metastatic disease

OBJECTIVES

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT has become integral to management of prostate cancer; however, PSMA-avid rib lesions pose a diagnostic challenge. This study investigated clinicopathological and imaging findings that predict metastatic etiology of PSMA-avid rib lesions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Consecutive patients with prostate cancer that underwent PET/CT with [18F]F-DCFPyL in 2021-2023 for newly diagnosed intermediate-/high-risk prostate cancer or recurrent/metastatic disease and had PSMA-avid rib lesions were included. Imaging findings assessed were: lesion number, PSMA expression (maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax), miPSMA score), CT features (sclerotic, lucent, fracture, no correlate), other sites of metastases, and primary tumor findings. A composite reference standard for rib lesion etiology (metastatic vs non-metastatic) based on histopathology, serial imaging, and clinical assessment was used.

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-five men (median 71 years, IQR 65-77) with PSMA-avid rib lesions were included; 47/175 (26.9%) had rib metastases. Only 1/47 (2.1%) of these patients had isolated rib metastasis without PSMA-avid metastases in other bones, nodes, or visceral organs; the other 46/47 (97.9%) patients with rib metastases also had other sites of PSMA-avid disease. Patients with rib metastases were older, had higher prostate-specific antigen levels, and higher-grade tumors (p < 0.01). Metastatic rib lesions had higher uptake (SUVmax, miPSMA), more commonly involved multiple ribs, and were more often sclerotic (p < 0.01); lucency/fractures were only seen in benign lesions.

CONCLUSION

Several imaging and clinicopathological factors differed between PSMA-avid metastatic and benign lesions. Isolated rib lesions without other sites of metastasis are almost always benign. Careful assessment of CT features can help diagnose benign lesions.

KEY POINTS

Question While prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-PET/CT has become integral to the management of prostate cancer, PSMA-avid rib lesions pose a diagnostic challenge. Findings Approximately a quarter of patients who had PSMA-avid rib lesions were metastatic. However, only 2.1% of them had isolated rib metastasis (without PSMA-avid metastases elsewhere). Clinical relevance Isolated PSMA-avid rib lesions are almost always benign when there is no evidence of metastatic disease elsewhere. Scrutinizing CT features can help diagnose benign PSMA-avid lesions with greater certainty.

Current insights on PSMA PET/CT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer: a literature review

The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the role of PSMA PET/CT in intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) patients, to determine whether it could help improve treatment strategy and prognostic stratification. A systematic literature search up to May 2024 was conducted in the PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases. Articles with mixed risk patient populations, review articles, editorials, letters, comments, or case reports were excluded. The quality of the papers was assessed by using the CASP criteria. The literature search returned 1111 studies; however, 1105 articles were excluded, and therefore 6 full-text papers were retrieved for the final analysis. Three out of six papers focused on the utility of SUVmax in identifying high ISUP grade in patients with intermediate-risk PCa. The latest three papers discussed the controversial role of PSMA PET/CT in predicting the lymph node involvement, mainly in the case of favorable subset. PSMA PET has completely changed the management of patients with PCa; indeed its role is still undefined in patients with intermediate-risk disease. Future perspective is to investigate larger cohorts of intermediate-risk PCa patients, to fully recognize the added value offered by PSMA PET in this category of subjects.

Is there a role of PSMA-PET in focal therapy planning and follow-up?

INTRODUCTION

Focal therapy (FT) is a promising alternative to radical treatments for localized Prostate Cancer (PCa) in selected patients. However, it is not yet considered a standard treatment option, and there is currently no consensus on managing patients after FT. In this context, Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography (PSMA-PET) may support multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) for both pre-operative planning and follow-up. The aim of this systematic review was to provide a comprehensive overview of the current applications of PSMA-PET in the field of FT and to analyze its future perspectives.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature search was performed using PubMed and Scopus databases, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement recommendations. All studies reporting data on PSMA-PET performed before and/or after FT for PCa were included. A narrative synthesis was employed to summarize the review findings. No quantitative synthesis was performed due to the heterogeneity and limitations of the studies.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Seven studies (2 case reports, 1 retrospective, and 4 prospective single-center studies) were included in this review. A moderate-severe risk of bias was assessed for the included studies. In the field of FT, PSMA-PET showed promising but yet not validated results with several possible applications: (1) pre-operative planning and staging, aiming to improve patient selection trough the identification of intraprostatic suspected lesions and more accurate local and systemic staging; (2) guidance for biopsy and Region of Interest (ROI) definition; (3) follow-up imaging tool, aiming to decrease the number of unnecessary surveillance biopsies.

CONCLUSIONS

Limited evidence exists regarding the use of PSMA-PET in the field of FT, considering pre-operative setting, treatment guidance and its use as a non-invasive tool to evaluate treatment success or failure and for follow-up. In this scenario, even if the current evidence is still limited and inconclusive, PSMA-PET showed promising results with several possible applications.

Improved Accuracy and Reliability of PRIMARY Scoring Using Delayed [68Ga] Ga-PSMA PET/CT Imaging

Objectives

Delayed [68Ga]Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) images show reduced PSMA uptake in benign lesions and increased PSMA uptake in malignant lesions. This study investigated the efficacy of PRIMARY scoring on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT images at standard versus delayed time points and assessed the potential added value of delayed imaging in PRIMARY scoring.

Methods

A total of 140 patients with biopsy results of International Society of Urological Pathology grade groups (ISUP) 1-2 who had standard (median 60 min) and delayed images (median 138 min) with [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT before radical prostatectomy were included. Results were confirmed in pathological reports. For diagnostic parameters, two experienced nuclear medicine physicians, who were blinded to clinical data, independently reviewed the images, and a third physician provided consensus in cases of disagreement. PRIMARY scoring was also conducted by four nuclear medicine physicians on both images, with a 1-month interval between assessments for intraobserver agreement analyses.

Results

The percentage of lesions scored as 1-2 in PRIMARY scoring decreased from 29% to 10% in delayed images compared with standard images, whereas lesions scored as 3-5 increased from 71% to 90%. Additionally, agreement between two experienced nuclear medicine physicians regarding scoring was 66% for standard imaging and 77% for delayed imaging. The number of patients with PRIMARY score 5 increased from 31 to 46 in delayed imaging. All patients were confirmed to have clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Furthermore, no csPCa of ISUP grade 3 or higher was detected in patients with a delayed PRIMARY score (dPRIMARY). The sensitivity of standard PRIMARY scoring was 71%, which increased to 92% with dPRIMARY scoring, with a consistent positive predictive value of 87% for both. Intraobserver agreement Cohen's kappa values for all observers were higher for delayed images than for standard images. Inter-observer agreement, assessed by Fleiss kappa, was 0.47 and 0.52 for standard images in rounds 1 and 2, respectively, and 0.61 and 0.72 for delayed images, respectively.

Conclusion

Decreased background activity and increased primary tumor uptake in delayed images improved differentiation between primary tumors and benign lesions, leading to better primary tumor identification. Enhanced reliability was also observed in both intraobserver and interobserver assessments of delayed images.

Using a novel PSMA-PET and PSA-based model to enhance the diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer and avoid unnecessary biopsy in men with PI-RADS ≤ 3 MRI

INTRODUCTION

The diagnostic evaluation of men with suspected prostate cancer (PCa) yet inconclusive MRI (PI-RADS ≤ 3) presents a common clinical challenge. [68Ga]Ga-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has shown promise in identifying clinically significant PCa (csPCa). We aim to establish a diagnostic model incorporating PSMA-PET to enhance the diagnostic process of csPCa in PI-RADS ≤ 3 men.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study retrospective included 151 men with clinical suspicion of PCa and PI-RADS ≤ 3 MRI. All men underwent [68Ga]Ga-PSMA PET/CT scans and ultrasound/MRI/PET fusion-guided biopsies. csPCa was defined as Grade Group ≥ 2. PRIMARY-scores from PSMA-PET scans were evaluated. A diagnostic model incorporating PSMA-PET and prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-derived parameters was developed. The discriminative performance and clinical utility were compared with conventional methods. Internal validation was conducted using a fivefold cross-validation with 1000 iterations.

RESULTS

In this PI-RADS ≤ 3 cohort, areas-under-the-curve (AUCs) for detecting csPCa were 0.796 (95%CI, 0.738-0.853), 0.851 (95%CI, 0.783-0.918) and 0.806 (95%CI, 0.742-0.870) for PRIMARY-score, SUVmax and routine clinical PSMA-PET assessment, respectively. The diagnostic model comprising PRIMARY-score, SUVmax and serum free PSA/total PSA (fPSA/tPSA) achieved a significantly higher AUC of 0.906 (95%CI, 0.851-0.961) compared to strategies based on PRIMARY-score or SUVmax (P < 0.05) and markedly superior to conventional strategies typically based on PSA density (P < 0.001). The average fivefold cross-validated AUC with 1000 iterations was 0.878 (95%CI, 0.820-0.954). Theoretically, using a threshold of 21.6%, the model could have prevented 78% of unnecessary biopsies while missing only 7.8% of csPCa cases in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

A novel diagnostic model incorporating PSMA-PET derived metrics-PRIMARY-score and SUVmax-along with serum fPSA/tPSA, has been developed and validated. The integrated model may assist clinical decision-making with enhanced diagnostic accuracy over the individual conventional metrics. It has great potential to reduce unnecessary biopsies for men with PI-RADS ≤ 3 MRI results and warrants further prospective and external evaluations.

Which PSMA PET/CT interpretation criteria most effectively diagnose prostate cancer? a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

PSMA PET/CT emerges as a pivotal technology in the diagnostic landscape of prostate cancer (PCa). It offers a suite of imaging interpretation criteria, notably the maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the molecular imaging prostate-specific membrane antigen score (miPSMA score), and the PSMA reporting and data system (PSMA-RADS). Identifying the most valuable criteria for diagnosing PCa and standardizing imaging interpretation across various tracers is an unresolved question. Our study endeavors to pinpoint the most optimal criteria to enhance the precision of PCa diagnosis, encompassing clinically significant PCa (csPCa), by evaluating the consistency and diagnostic accuracy of these three criteria using two [18F]-labeled PSMA tracers.

METHOD

This retrospective analysis spans a five-year period, focusing on patients with clinically suspected or newly diagnosed, treatment-naïve PCa who underwent 18F-PSMA PET/CT. The study is bifurcated into two segments: 1.A direct comparison assessing the consistency in SUVmax, miPSMA scores, and PSMA-RADS among PSMA PET/CT tracers ([18F]DCFPyL and [18F]PSMA-1007) for prostate foci in 24 patients. 2. An analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of these three criteria for both PCa and csPCa across 55 [18F]DCFPyL and 65 [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans, respectively.

RESULTS

1.Our head-to-head study reveals that SUVmax and miPSMA score exhibit near-perfect consistency, with PSMA-RADS demonstrating substantial consistency. 2. The diagnostic accuracy ranking, considering both PCa and csPCa, stands as miPSMA score ≈ SUVmax > PSMA-RADS for [18F]DCFPyL PET/CT, contrasting with miPSMA score > SUVmax ≈ PSMA-RADS for [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT.

CONCLUSION

The miPSMA score outperforms SUVmax and PSMA-RADS in terms of inter-tracer consistency and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of PCa, including csPCa, when comparing [18F]DCFPyL and [18F]PSMA-1007 PET/CT scans. This underscores the miPSMA score's potential as a robust criterion for PCa and csPCa diagnosis, holding substantial promise for refining clinical decision-making and patient management strategies.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

not applicable.

Development and validation of biopsy free nomograms for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer in men with PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions

To develop and validate biopsy-free nomograms to more accurately predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve men with prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) ≥ 4 lesions. A cohort of 931 patients with PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions, undergoing prostate biopsies or radical prostatectomy from January 2020 to August 2023, was analyzed. Various clinical variables, including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume (PV), PSA density (PSAD), prostate health index (PHI), and maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) from PSMA PET-CT imaging, were assessed for predicting csPCa. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plots, and decision-curve analyses, with internal validation. The foundational model (nomogram 1) encompassed the entire cohort, accurately predicting csPCa by incorporating variables such as age, PSAD, PV, PSA ratio variations, suspicious lesion location, and history of acute urinary retention (AUR). The AUC for csPCa prediction achieved by the foundational model was 0.918, with internal validation confirming reliability (AUC: 0.908). Advanced models (nomogram 2 and 3), incorporating PHI and PHI + PSMA SUVmax, achieved AUCs of 0.908 and 0.955 in the training set and 0.847 and 0.949 in the validation set, respectively. Decision analysis indicated enhanced biopsy outcome predictions with the advanced models. Nomogram 3 could potentially reduce biopsies by 92.41%, while missing only 1.53% of csPCa cases. In conclusion, the newly biopsy-free approaches for patients with PI-RADS ≥ 4 lesions represent a significant advancement in csPCa diagnosis in this high-risk population.

The impact of integrating PRIMARY score or SUVmax with MRI-based risk models for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

PURPOSE

An MRI-based risk calculator (RC) has been recommended for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). PSMA PET/CT can detect lesions that are not visible on MRI, and the addition of PSMA PET/CT to MRI may improve diagnostic performance. The aim of this study was to incorporate the PRIMARY score or SUVmax derived from [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT into the RC and compare these models with MRI-based RC to assess whether this can further reduce unnecessary biopsies.

METHODS

A total of 683 consecutive biopsy-naïve men who underwent both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and MRI before biopsy were temporally divided into a development cohort (n = 552) and a temporal validation cohort (n = 131). Three logistic regression RCs were developed and compared: MRI-RC, MRI-SUVmax-RC and MRI-PRIMARY-RC. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were evaluated. The primary outcome was the clinical utility of the risk calculators for detecting csPCa and reducing the number of negative biopsies.

RESULTS

The prevalence of csPCa was 47.5% (262/552) in the development cohort and 41.9% (55/131) in the temporal validation cohort. In the development cohort, the AUC of MRI-PRIMARY-RC was significantly higher than that of MRI-RC (0.924 vs. 0.868, p < 0.001) and MRI-SUVmax-RC (0.924 vs. 0.904, p = 0.002). In the temporal validation cohort, MRI-PRIMARY-RC also showed the best discriminative ability with an AUC of 0.921 (95% CI: 0.873-0.969). Bootstrapped calibration curves revealed that the model fit was acceptable. MRI-PRIMARY-RC exhibited near-perfect calibration within the range of 0-40%. DCA showed that MRI-PRIMARY-RC had the greatest net benefit for detecting csPCa compared with MRI-RC and MRI-SUVmax-RC at a risk threshold of 5-40% for csPCa in both the development and validation cohorts.

CONCLUSION

The addition of the PRIMARY score to MRI-based multivariable model improved the accuracy of risk stratification prior to biopsy. Our novel MRI-PRIMARY prediction model is a promising approach for reducing unnecessary biopsies and improving the early detection of csPCa.

PSMA PET/CT imaging and its application to prostate cancer treatment

Recognition of the importance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate cancer has steadily increased following the publication of extensive data on its diagnostic accuracy and impact on patient management over the past decade. Several recent clinical trials and investigations regarding PSMA PET/CT have been ongoing in our country, and this examination is expected to become increasingly widespread in the future. This review explains the characteristics of PSMA PET/CT, its diagnostic capabilities and superiority over other modalities, the three proposed PSMA PET/CT interpretation criteria (the European Association of Nuclear Medicine [EANM], the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation [PROMISE], and the PSMA Reporting and Data System [PSMA-RADS]), and the application of PSMA PET/CT to prostate cancer treatment (improvement of local control, irradiation of oligometastases, and salvage radiotherapy), incorporating actual clinical images and the latest findings.

Biological determinants of PSMA expression, regulation and heterogeneity in prostate cancer

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is an important cell-surface imaging biomarker and therapeutic target in prostate cancer. The PSMA-targeted theranostic 177Lu-PSMA-617 was approved in 2022 for men with PSMA-PET-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, not all patients respond to PSMA-radioligand therapy, in part owing to the heterogeneity of PSMA expression in the tumour. The PSMA regulatory network is composed of a PSMA transcription complex, an upstream enhancer that loops to the FOLH1 (PSMA) gene promoter, intergenic enhancers and differentially methylated regions. Our understanding of the PSMA regulatory network and the mechanisms underlying PSMA suppression is evolving. Clinically, molecular imaging provides a unique window into PSMA dynamics that occur on therapy and with disease progression, although challenges arise owing to the limited resolution of PET. PSMA regulation and heterogeneity - including intertumoural and inter-patient heterogeneity, temporal changes, lineage dynamics and the tumour microenvironment - affect PSMA theranostics. PSMA response and resistance to radioligand therapy are mediated by a number of potential mechanisms, and complementary biomarkers beyond PSMA are under development. Understanding the biological determinants of cell surface target regulation and heterogeneity can inform precision medicine approaches to PSMA theranostics as well as other emerging therapies.

The association of quantitative PSMA PET parameters with pathologic ISUP grade: an international multicenter analysis

PURPOSE

To assess if PSMA PET quantitative parameters are associated with pathologic ISUP grade group (GG) and upgrading/downgrading.

METHODS

PCa patients undergoing radical prostatectomy with or without pelvic lymph node dissection staged with preoperative PSMA PET at seven referral centres worldwide were evaluated. PSMA PET parameters which included SUVmax, PSMAvolume, and total PSMA accumulation (PSMAtotal) were collected. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated the association between PSMA PET quantified parameters and surgical ISUP GG. Decision-tree analysis was performed to identify discriminative thresholds for all three parameters related to the five ISUP GGs The ROC-derived AUC was used to determine whether the inclusion of PSMA quantified parameters improved the ability of multivariable models to predict ISUP GG ≥ 4.

RESULTS

A total of 605 patients were included. Overall, 2%, 37%, 37%, 10% and 13% patients had pathologic ISUP GG1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, respectively. At multivariable analyses, all three parameters SUVmax, PSMAvolume and PSMAtotal were associated with GG ≥ 4 at surgical pathology after accounting for PSA and clinical T stage based on DRE, hospital and radioligand (all p < 0.05). Addition of all three parameters significantly improved the discrimination of clinical models in predicting GG ≥ 4 from 68% (95%CI 63 - 74) to 74% (95%CI 69 - 79) for SUVmax, 72% (95%CI 67 - 76) for PSMAvolume, 74% (70 - 79) for PSMAtotal and 75% (95%CI 71 - 80) when all parameters were included (all p < 0.05). Decision-tree analysis resulted in thresholds that discriminate between GG (SUVmax 0-6.5, 6.5-15, 15-28, > 28, PSMAvol 0-2, 2-9, 9-20 and > 20 and PSMAtotal 0-12, 12-98 and > 98). PSMAvolume was significantly associated with GG upgrading (OR 1.03 95%CI 1.01 - 1.05). In patients with biopsy GG1-3, PSMAvolume ≥ 2 was significantly associated with higher odds for upgrading to ISUP GG ≥ 4, compared to PSMAvolume < 2 (OR 6.36, 95%CI 1.47 - 27.6).

CONCLUSION

Quantitative PSMA PET parameters are associated with surgical ISUP GG and upgrading. We propose clinically relevant thresholds of these parameters which can improve in PCa risk stratification in daily clinical practice.

Standardized template for clinical reporting of PSMA PET/CT scans

PURPOSE

Accurate diagnosis and staging of prostate cancer are crucial to improving patient care. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging has demonstrated superiority for initial staging and restaging in patients with prostate cancer. Referring physicians and PET/CT readers must agree on a consistent communication method and application of information derived from this imaging modality. While several guidelines have been published, a single PSMA PET/CT reporting template has yet to be widely adopted. Based on the consensus from community and academic physicians, we developed a standardized PSMA PET/CT reporting template for radiologists and nuclear medicine physicians to report and relay key imaging findings to referring physicians. The aim was to improve the quality, clarity, and utility of imaging results reporting to facilitate patient management decisions.

METHODS

Based on community and expert consensus, we developed a standardized PSMA PET/CT reporting template to deliver key imaging findings to referring clinicians.

RESULTS

Core category components proposed include a summary of any prior treatment history; presence, location, and degree of PSMA radiopharmaceutical uptake in primary and/or metastatic tumor(s), lesions with no uptake, and incidentally found lesions with positive uptake on PET/CT.

CONCLUSIONS

This article provides recommendations on best practices for standardized reporting of PSMA PET/CT imaging. The generated reporting template is a proposed supplement designed to educate and improve data communication between imaging experts and referring physicians.

Target Volume Optimization for Localized Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

To provide a comprehensive review of the means by which to optimize target volume definition for the purposes of treatment planning for patients with intact prostate cancer with a specific emphasis on focal boost volume definition.

METHODS

Here we conduct a narrative review of the available literature summarizing the current state of knowledge on optimizing target volume definition for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Historically, the treatment of prostate cancer included a uniform prescription dose administered to the entire prostate with or without coverage of all or part of the seminal vesicles. The development of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) using prostate-specific radiotracers has ushered in an era in which radiation oncologists are able to localize and focally dose-escalate high-risk volumes in the prostate gland. Recent phase 3 data has demonstrated that incorporating focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes of the prostate improves biochemical control without significantly increasing toxicity. Still, several fundamental questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this technique. Given the remaining uncertainty, a knowledge of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the anatomic patterns of tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for the definition of clinical target volumes.

CONCLUSION

Advanced imaging has the ability to improve outcomes for patients with prostate cancer in multiple ways, including by enabling focal dose escalation to high-risk subvolumes. However, many questions remain regarding the optimal target volume definition and prescription strategy to implement this practice, and key knowledge gaps remain. A detailed understanding of the pathological correlates of radiographic findings and the patterns of local tumor spread may help inform clinical judgement for target volume definition given the current state of uncertainty.

PSMA-based therapeutics for prostate cancer

INTRODUCTION

The prostate cancer (PCa) consists the most frequently diagnosed malignancy of urogenital system in males. Traditionally, treatment of localized PCa was based on surgery or radiotherapy while hormonotherapy was used in more advanced stages. However, the implementation of radiolabels has revolutionized the landscape of prostate cancer. Specifically, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been investigated in different aspects of PCa therapeutic era.

AREAS COVERED

A literature review is presented about the implications of PSMA radiolabels on prostate cancer treatment. PSMA tracers were initially used as an imaging technique. Afterwards, PSMA labeled with isotopes presenting cytotoxic abilities, such as lutetium-117 and actinium-225, while reports exist about the use of radioligand immunotherapy. Meanwhile, ongoing trials examine the development of novel radionuclides as well as the evolution of the PSMA-targeted ligands.

EXPERT OPINION

Currently, PSMA radioligand treatment of prostate cancer is approved in the metastatic stage of the disease. Meanwhile, a variety of trials exist about its possible role in less advanced stages. However, plenty of parameters should be addressed before these implementations, such as PSMA dosage, dosimetry issues, and its safety profile. A future well-designed study with proper patient selection is mandatory to further explore PSMA radioligand theranostics perspectives.

Diagnostic Performance of [18F]AlF-Thretide PET/CT in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Using Histopathology as Reference Standard

This study aimed to assess the diagnostic value of [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Methods: In total, 49 patients with biopsy-proven PCa were enrolled in this prospective study. All patients underwent [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT, and the scoring system of the PRIMARY trial was used for PET image analysis. The dosimetry evaluation of [18F]AlF-thretide was performed on 3 patients. Pathologic examination was used as the reference standard to evaluate the location, number, size, and Gleason score of tumors, for comparison with the [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT results. PSMA expression was evaluated by immunohistochemical staining. Results: All patients tolerated the [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT well. The total effective dose of [18F]AlF-thretide was 1.16E-02 mSv/MBq. For patient-based analysis of intraprostatic tumors, 46 of 49 (93.9%) patients showed pathologic uptake on [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT. For lesion-based analysis of intraprostatic tumors, the sensitivity and positive predictive value for [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT were 58.2% and 90.5%, respectively. Delayed images can detect more lesions than standard images (n = 57 vs. 49, P = 0.005), and the SUVmax and tumor-to-background ratio of the former were higher than those of the latter (SUVmax: 14.5 ± 16.7 vs. 11.4 ± 13.6, P < 0.001; tumor-to-background ratio: 37.1 ± 42.3 vs. 23.1 ± 27.4, P < 0.001). The receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis showed that the areas under the curve for PRIMARY score-predicted true-positive and false-positive lesions were significantly higher than those for the SUVmax of standard images (P = 0.015) and seemed higher than those for the SUVmax of delayed images (P = 0.257). [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT showed a higher detection rate than multiparametric MRI for all intraprostatic foci (53.5% vs. 40.8%, P = 0.012) and clinically significant PCa (75.0% vs. 61.4%, P = 0.031). Conclusion: [18F]AlF-thretide PET/CT showed high diagnostic value for patients with primary PCa and can be used as an excellent imaging modality for preoperative evaluation of PCa patients.

Avoiding unnecessary biopsy: the combination of PRIMARY score with prostate-specific antigen density for prostate biopsy decision

BACKGROUND

Avoiding unnecessary biopsies for men with suspected prostate cancer remains a clinical priority. The recently proposed PRIMARY score improves diagnostic accuracy in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). The aim of this study was to determine the best strategy combining PRIMARY score or MRI reporting scores (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS]) with prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) for prostate biopsy decision making.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 343 patients who underwent both 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and MRI before prostate biopsy was performed. PSA was restricted to <20 ng/ml. Different biopsy strategies were developed and compared based on PRIMARY score or PI-RADS with PSAD thresholds. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was plotted to define the optimal biopsy strategy.

RESULTS

The prevalence of csPCa was 41.1% (141/343). According to DCA, the strategies of PRIMARY score +PSAD (strategy #1, strategy #2, strategy #6) had a higher net benefit than the strategies of PI-RADS + PSAD at the risk threshold of 8-20%. The best diagnostic strategy was strategy #1 (PRIMARY score 4-5 or PSAD ≥ 0.20), which avoided 38.2% biopsy procedures while missed 9.2% of csPCa cases. From a clinical perspective, strategies with a lower risk of missing csPCa were strategy #2 (PRIMARY score ≥4 or PSAD ≥ 0.15), which avoided 28.6% biopsies while missed 5.7% of csPCa cases, or strategy #6 (PRIMARY score≥3 or PSAD ≥ 0.15), which avoided 20.7% biopsies while missed only 3.5% of csPCa cases. The limitations of the study were the retrospective single-center nature.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of PRIMARY score +PSAD allows individualized decisions to avoid unnecessary biopsy, outperforming the strategies of PI-RADS + PSAD. Further prospective trials are needed to validate these findings.

The Value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI for Classifying Patients with PI-RADS 3 Lesions on Multiparametric MRI: A Prospective Single-Center Study

Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) category 3 lesions remain a diagnostic challenge for detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). This article evaluates the added value of 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen-11 (68Ga-PSMA) PET/MRI in classifying PI-RADS 3 lesions to avoid unnecessary biopsies. Methods: Sixty biopsy-naïve men with PI-RADS 3 lesions on multiparametric MRI were prospectively enrolled between February 2020 and October 2022. In all, 56 participants underwent 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI and prostate systematic biopsy. 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI was independently evaluated and reported by the 5-level PRIMARY score developed within the PRIMARY trial. Receiver-operating-characteristic curve analysis was used to estimate the diagnostic performance. Results: csPCa was detected in 8 of 56 patients (14.3%). The proportion of patients with csPCa and a PRIMARY score of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 was 0% (0/12), 0% (0/13), 6.3% (1/16), 38.5% (5/13), and 100% (2/2), respectively. The estimated area under the curve of the PRIMARY score was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.817-0.999). For a PRIMARY score of 4-5 versus a PRIMARY score of 1-3, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 87.5%, 83.3%, 46.7%, and 97.5%, respectively. With a PRIMARY score of at least 4 to make a biopsy decision in men with PI-RADS 3 lesions, 40 of 48 patients (83.3%) could avoid unnecessary biopsies, at the expense of missing 1 of 8 (12.5%) csPCa cases. Conclusion: 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI has great potential to classify patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions and help avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer by [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT: a potential tool for selecting patients for active surveillance

PURPOSE

In our study, our aim was to investigate the role of [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET /CT imaging in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (ISUP GG 2 and higher) in patients initially diagnosed with ISUP GG 1 and 2 after prostate biopsy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 147 patient records in whom [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging was performed preoperatively. All patients were initially diagnosed with ISUP GG 1 and 2 PCa by biopsy. Final pathology reports were obtained after radical prostatectomy. The [68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT images were evaluated to determine the PRIMARY score. Patients' mpMRI-PIRADS scores were also recorded when available and analyzed in correlation with the pathology results.

RESULTS

For the 114 patients scored using PRIMARY, 19 out of 37 patients with scores of 1 and 2 (51%) were diagnosed with csPCa. Of the 77 patients with PRIMARY scores between 3 and 5, 64 (83%) had csPCa. Notably, every patient with a PRIMARY score of 5 had csPCa. PRIMARY scoring had a sensitivity of 77% and specificity of 58%, with a positive predictive value of 83%. A moderate correlation was observed between PRIMARY scores and ISUP GG (Rho = 0.54, p < 0.001). In contrast, the PIRADS score displayed a sensitivity and specificity of 86% and 25% respectively, with a positive predictive value of 68%. No substantial correlation was found between PIRADS and ISUP GG. Statistical analysis revealed a significant correlation between PRIMARY and ISUP GG (p < 0.001), but not between PIRADS and ISUP GG (p = 0.281). Comparatively, PRIMARY scoring was significantly more reliable than PIRADS scoring in identifying csPCa.

CONCLUSION

[68 Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT imaging is promising for distinguishing high-risk prostate cancer patients from those apt for active surveillance, potentially aiding in the identification of csPCa.

Novel non-MRI imaging techniques for primary diagnosis of prostate cancer: micro-ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound, elastography, multiparametric ultrasound, and PSMA PET/CT

BACKGROUND

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) provides enhanced diagnostic accuracy in the detection of prostate cancer, but is not devoid of limitations. Given the recent evolution of non-MRI imaging techniques, this critical review of the literature aimed at summarizing the available evidence on ultrasound-based and nuclear medicine imaging technologies in the initial diagnosis of PCa.

METHODS

Three databases (PubMed®, Web of Science™, and Scopus®) were queried for studies examining their diagnostic performance in the primary diagnosis of PCa, weighted against a histological confirmation of PCa diagnosis, using a free-text protocol. Retrospective and prospective studies, both comparative and non-comparative, systematic reviews (SR) and meta-analysis (MA) were included. Based on authors' expert opinion, studies were selected, data extracted, and results qualitatively described.

RESULTS

Micro-ultrasound (micro-US) appears as an appealing diagnostic strategy given its high accuracy in detection of PCa, apparently non-inferior to mpMRI. The use of multiparametric US (mpUS) likely gives an advantage in terms of effectiveness coming from the combination of different modalities, especially when certain modalities are combined. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT may represent a whole-body, one-step approach for appropriate diagnosis and staging of PCa. The direct relationship between lesions avidity of radiotracers and histopathologic and prognostic features, and its valid diagnostic performance represents appealing characteristics. However, intrinsic limits of each of these techniques exist and further research is needed before definitively considering them reliable tools for accurate PCa diagnosis. Other novel technologies, such as elastography and multiparametric US, currently relies on a limited number of studies, and therefore evidence about them remains preliminary.

CONCLUSION

Evidence on the role of non-MRI imaging options in the primary diagnosis of PCa is steadily building up. This testifies a growing interest towards novel technologies that might allow overcoming some of the limitations of current gold standard MRI imaging.

Diagnostic Performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT Versus Multiparametric MRI for Detection of Intraprostatic Radiorecurrent Prostate Cancer

For men with prostate cancer who develop biochemical failure after radiotherapy, European guidelines recommend reimaging with 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). However, the accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT for detecting intraprostatic recurrences is unclear, both with and without mpMRI. Methods: A single-center retrospective study of a series of patients investigated for radiorecurrence between 2016 and 2022 is described. All patients underwent 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, mpMRI, and prostate biopsy. PET/CT images were interpreted independently by 2 expert readers masked to other imaging and clinical data. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of PET/CT versus mpMRI and of PET/CT with mpMRI together versus mpMRI alone. The secondary outcome was the proportion of cancers missed by mpMRI but detected by PET/CT. Diagnostic accuracy analysis was performed at the prostate hemigland level using cluster bootstrapping. Results: Thirty-five men (70 hemiglands) were included. Cancer was confirmed by biopsy in 43 of 70 hemiglands (61%). PET/CT sensitivity and negative predictive values (NPVs) were 0.89 (95% CI, 0.78-0.98) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.62-0.95), respectively, which were not significantly different from results by MRI (sensitivity of 0.72; 95% CI, 0.61-0.83; P = 0.1) (NPV of 0.59; 95% CI, 0.41-0.75; P = 0.07). Specificity and positive predictive values were not significantly different. When PET/CT and MRI were used together, the sensitivity was 0.98 (95% CI, 0.92-1.00) and NPV was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.75-1.00), both significantly higher than MRI alone (P = 0.003 and P < 0.001, respectively). Specificity and positive predictive values remained not significantly different. MRI missed 12 of 43 cancers (28%; 95% CI, 17%-43%), of which 11 of 12 (92%; 95% CI, 62%-100%) were detected by PET/CT. Conclusion: For detecting intraprostatic radiorecurrence, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT has high sensitivity that is not significantly different from mpMRI. When 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI were used together, the results conferred a significantly greater sensitivity and NPV than with mpMRI alone. 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT may therefore be a useful tool in the diagnosis of localized radiorecurrence.

Reliability and practicability of PSMA-RADS 1.0 for structured reporting of PSMA-PET/CT scans in prostate cancer patients

OBJECTIVES

As structured reporting is increasingly used in the evaluation of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) for prostate cancer, there is a need to assess the reliability of these frameworks. This study aimed to evaluate the intra- and interreader agreement among readers with varying levels of experience using PSMA-RADS 1.0 for interpreting PSMA-PET/CT scans, even when blinded to clinical data, and therefore to determine the feasibility of implementing this reporting system in clinical practice.

METHODS

PSMA-PET/CT scans of 103 patients were independently evaluated by 4 readers with different levels of experience according to the reporting and data system (RADS) for PSMA-PET/CT imaging PSMA-RADS 1.0 at 2 time points within 6 weeks. For each scan, a maximum of five target lesions were freely chosen and stratified according to PSMA-RADS 1.0. Overall scan score and compartment-based scores were assessed. Intra- and interreader agreement was determined using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

PSMA-RADS 1.0 demonstrated excellent interreader agreement for both overall scan scores (ICC ≥ 0.91) and compartment-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.93) across all four readers. The framework showed excellent intrareader agreement for overall scan scores (ICC ≥ 0.86) and compartment-based scores (ICC ≥ 0.95), even among readers with varying levels of experience.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a reliable method for assessing PSMA-PET/CT with strong consistency and agreement among readers. It shows great potential for establishing a standard approach to diagnosing and planning treatment for prostate cancer patients, and can be used confidently even by readers with less experience.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

This study underlines that PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a valuable and highly reliable scoring system for PSMA-PET/CT scans of prostate cancer patients and can be used confidently by radiologists with different levels of experience in routine clinical practice.

KEY POINTS

PSMA-RADS version 1.0 is a scoring system for PSMA-PET/CT scans. Its reproducibility needs to be analyzed in order to make it applicable to clinical practice. Excellent interreader and intrareader agreement for overall scan scores and compartment-based scores using PSMA-RADS 1.0 were seen in readers with varying levels of experience. PSMA-RADS 1.0 is a reliable tool for accurately diagnosing and planning treatment for prostate cancer patients, and can be used confidently in clinical routine.

A single-center, multi-factor, retrospective study to improve the diagnostic accuracy of primary prostate cancer using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 total-body PET/CT imaging

PURPOSE

To improve the diagnostic accuracy of initial detection in patients with suspected primary prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

Eighty-four patients who underwent Gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen ([68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11) total-body positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging before treatment in our department were enrolled. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the prostate (SUVmax-PSMA), liver (SUVmax-PSMA-L), and mediastinal blood pool (SUVmax-PSMA-M) was measured using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 total-body PET/CT imaging. The [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 derived metabolic tumor volume (MTV), the total lesion (TLP), and the cross-sectional areas of focal concentration in the prostate (CAP) were also determined. Besides, the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and the above imaging characteristics were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curves to identify the cutoff value to improve the diagnostic accuracy of suspected PCa. Finally, a multivariate regression analysis was conducted to discover the independent predictor to improve the diagnostic accuracy on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 total-body imaging.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the PCa and Non-PCa groups in age, height, weight, injected dose, except for the PSA levels, the SUVmax-PSMA, TLP, MTV, and CAP. Besides, the SUVmax-PSMA-T/L and SUVmax-PSMA-T/M derived from SUVmax-PSMA were both significantly different. In addition, the areas under the curve of PSA levels, SUVmax-PSMA, SUVmax-PSMA-T/L, SUVmax-PSMA-T/M, TLP, MTV, and CAP to predict PCa on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 imaging were 0.620 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.485-0.755), 0.864 (95% CI 0.757-0.972), 0.819 (95% CI 0.704-0.935), 0.876 (95% CI 0.771-0.980), 0.845 (95% CI 0.741-0.949), 0.820 (95% CI 0.702-0.938), 0.627 (95% CI 0.499-0.754), respectively. However, a multivariate regression analysis showed that SUVmax-PSMA was an independent predictor, with a cutoff value of 11.5 and an odds ratio of 1.221.

CONCLUSION

The SUVmax-PSMA with a cutoff value of 11.5 was an independent predictor to improve the diagnostic accuracy of PCa on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 total-body imaging.

Reproducibility and Accuracy of the PRIMARY Score on PSMA PET and of PI-RADS on Multiparametric MRI for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Within a Real-World Database

The PRIMARY score is a 5-category scale developed to identify clinically significant intraprostate malignancy (csPCa) on 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-11 PET/CT (68Ga-PSMA PET) using a combination of anatomic site, pattern, and intensity. Developed within the PRIMARY trial, the score requires evaluation in external datasets. This study aimed to assess the reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy of the PRIMARY score in a cohort of patients who underwent multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and 68Ga-PSMA PET before prostate biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods: In total, data from 242 men who had undergone 68Ga-PSMA PET and mpMRI before transperineal prostate biopsy were available for this ethics-approved retrospective study. 68Ga-PSMA PET and mpMRI data were centrally collated in a cloud-based deidentified image database. Six experienced prostate-focused nuclear medicine specialists were trained (1 h) in applying the PRIMARY score with 30 sample images. Six radiologists experienced in prostate mpMRI read images as per the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), version 2.1. All images were read (with masking of clinical information) at least twice, with discordant findings sent to a masked third (or fourth) reader as necessary. Cohen κ was determined for both imaging scales as 5 categories and then collapsed to binary (negative and positive) categories (score 1 or 2 vs. 3, 4, or 5). Diagnostic performance parameters were calculated, with an International Society of Urological Pathology grade group of at least 2 (csPCa) on biopsy defined as the gold standard. Combined-imaging-positive results were defined as any PI-RADS score of 4 or 5 or as a PI-RADS score of 1-3 with a PRIMARY score of 3-5. Results: In total, 227 patients with histopathology, 68Ga-PSMA PET, and mpMRI imaging before prostate biopsy were included; 33% had no csPCa, and 67% had csPCa. Overall interrater reliability was higher for the PRIMARY scale (κ = 0.70) than for PI-RADS (κ = 0.58) when assessed as a binary category (benign vs. malignant). This was similar for all 5 categories (κ = 0.65 vs. 0.48). Diagnostic performance to detect csPCa was comparable between PSMA PET and mpMRI (sensitivity, 86% vs. 89%; specificity, 76% vs. 74%; positive predictive value, 88% vs. 88%; negative predictive value, 72% vs. 76%). Using combined imaging, sensitivity was 94%, specificity was 68%, positive predictive value was 86%, and negative predictive value was 85%. Conclusion: The PRIMARY score applied by first-user nuclear medicine specialists showed substantial interrater reproducibility, exceeding that of PI-RADS applied by mpMRI-experienced radiologists. Diagnostic performance was similar between the 2 modalities. The PRIMARY score should be considered when interpreting intraprostatic PSMA PET images.

Modified PROMISE criteria for standardized interpretation of gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR)-targeted PET

PURPOSE

There are image interpretation criteria to standardize reporting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-targeted positron emission tomography (PET). As up to 10% of prostate cancer (PC) do not express PSMA, other targets such as gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) are evaluated. Research on GRPR-targeted imaging has been slowly increasing in usage at staging and biochemical recurrence (BCR) of PC. We therefore propose a modification of the Prostate Cancer Molecular Imaging Standardized Evaluation (PROMISE) criteria (mPROMISE) for GRPR-targeted PET.

METHODS

[68 Ga]Ga-RM2 PET data from initially prospective studies performed at our institution were retrospectively reviewed: 44 patients were imaged for staging and 100 patients for BCR PC. Two nuclear medicine physicians independently evaluated PET according to the mPROMISE criteria. A third expert reader served as standard reference. Interreader reliability was computed for GRPR expression, prostate bed (T), lymph node (N), skeleton (Mb), organ (Mc) metastases, and final judgment of the scan.

RESULTS

The interrater reliability for GRPR PET at staging was moderate for GRPR expression (0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.40, 0.78), substantial for T-stage (0.78; 95% CI 0.63, 0.94), and almost perfect for N-stage (0.97; 95% CI 0.92, 1.00) and final judgment (0.92; 95% CI 0.82, 1.00). The interreader agreement at BCR showed substantial agreement for GRPR expression (0.70; 95% CI 0.59, 0.81) and final judgment (0.65; 95% CI 0.53, 0.78), while almost perfect agreement was seen across the major categories (T, N, Mb, Mc). Acceptable performance of the mPROMISE criteria was found for all subsets when compared to the standard reference.

CONCLUSION

Interpreting GRPR-targeted PET using the mPROMISE criteria showed its reliability with substantial or almost perfect interrater agreement across all major categories. The proposed modification of the PROMISE criteria will aid clinicians in decreasing the level of uncertainty, and clinical trials to achieve uniform evaluation, reporting, and comparability of GRPR-targeted PET.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03113617 and NCT02624518.

A Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET-Based Approach for Improved Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Gleason Grade Group 1: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

The preoperative Gleason grade group (GG) from transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy is crucial for treatment decisions but may underestimate the postoperative GG and miss clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), particularly in patients with biopsy GG1. In such patients, an SUVmax of at least 12 has 100% specificity for detecting csPCa. In patients with an SUVmax of less than 12, we aimed to develop a model to improve the diagnostic accuracy of csPCa. Methods: The study retrospectively included 56 prostate cancer patients with transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy GG1 and an SUVmax of less than 12 from 2 tertiary hospitals. All [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC PET scans were centrally reviewed in Xijing Hospital. A deep learning model was used to evaluate the overlap of SUVmax (size scale, 3 cm) and the level of Gleason pattern (size scale, 500 μm). A diagnostic model was developed using the PRIMARY score and SUVmax, and its discriminative performance and clinical utility were compared with other methods. The 5-fold cross-validation (repeated 1,000 times) was used for internal validation. Results: In patients with GG1 and an SUVmax of less than 12, significant prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) histochemical score (H-score) H-score overlap occurred among benign gland, Gleason pattern 3, and Gleason pattern 4 lesions, causing SUVmax overlap between csPCa and non-csPCa. The model of 10 × PRIMARY score + 2 × SUVmax exhibited a higher area under the curve (AUC, 0.8359; 95% CI, 0.7233-0.9484) than that found using only the SUVmax (AUC, 0.7353; P = 0.048) or PRIMARY score (AUC, 0.7257; P = 0.009) for the cohort and a higher AUC (0.8364; 95% CI, 0.7114-0.9614) than that found using only the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 5-4 versus 3-1 (AUC, 0.7036; P = 0.149) and the PI-RADS score of 5-3 versus 2-1 (AUC, 0.6373; P = 0.014) for a subgroup. The model reduced the misdiagnosis of the PI-RADS score of 5-4 versus 3-1 by 78.57% (11/14) and the PI-RADS score of 5-3 versus 2-1 by 77.78% (14/18). The internal validation showed that the mean 5-fold cross-validated AUC was 0.8357 (95% CI, 0.8357-0.8358). Conclusion: We preliminarily suggest that the model of 10 × PRIMARY score + 2 × SUVmax may enhance the diagnostic accuracy of csPCa in patients with biopsy GG1 and an SUVmax of less than 12 by maximizing PSMA information use, reducing the misdiagnosis of the PI-RADS score, and thereby aiding in making appropriate treatment decisions.

PI-RADS-Based Segmented Threshold of PSMA-PET SUVmax Is Better than Traditional Fixed Threshold for Diagnosing Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Especially for PI-RADS 3 Lesions

OBJECTIVES

Our purpose was to compare the performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-positron emission tomography (PET) traditional fixed threshold (FT) and newly established Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS)-based segmented threshold (ST) for diagnosing clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa).

METHODS

The study retrospectively included 218 patients who underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and PSMA-PET examination for suspected prostate cancer (PCa) from January 2018 to November 2021. Lesions with Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 were diagnosed as csPCa. In PSMA-PET maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), the FT for all the lesions and STs for lesions with different PI-RADS score for diagnosing csPCa were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves analysis and compared with Z test. The McNemar test was used to compare sensitivity and specificity.

RESULTS

Among the 218 patients, there were 113 csPCa and 105 non-csPCa. The PSMA-PET FT was SUVmax > 5.3 (area under the curve, AUC = 0.842) and STs for PI-RADS 3/4/5 were SUVmax > 4.2/5.7/6.0 (AUCs = 0.870/0.867/0.882), respectively. The AUC of PSMA-PET ST was higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.872 vs. 0.842), especially for PI-RADS 3 (0.870 vs. 0.653). Multimodality diagnostic criteria combining PSMA-PET ST and PI-RADS scores of mpMRI was established and its AUC was higher than that of PSMA-PET ST (0.893 vs. 0.872) and significantly higher than that of PSMA-PET FT (0.893 vs. 0.842) with an improvement in sensitivity (93% vs. 78%, p < 0.05) without significantly sacrificing specificity (86% vs. 91%, p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

For diagnosing csPCa, PI-RADS-based PSMA-PET segmented threshold achieved better performance than traditional fixed threshold, especially for PI-RADS 3 lesions. Multimodality diagnostic criteria demonstrated higher diagnostic performance than segmented threshold and significantly better than PSMA-PET fixed threshold for detecting csPCa.

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT-based multivariate model for highly accurate and noninvasive diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in the PSA gray zone

BACKGROUND

The prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been widely used in screening and early diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). However, in the PSA grey zone of 4-10 ng/ml, the sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing PCa are limited, resulting in considerable number of unnecessary and invasive prostate biopsies, which may lead to potential overdiagnosis and overtreatment. We aimed to predict clinically significant PCa (CSPCa) by combining the maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) based on 68Ga‑PSMA PET/CT and clinical indicators in men with gray zone PSA levels.

METHODS

81 patients with suspected PCa based on increased serum total PSA (TPSA) levels of 4 - 10 ng/mL who underwent transrectal ultrasound/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/PET fusion-guided biopsy were enrolled. Among them, patients confirmed by histopathology were divided into the CSPCa group and the non-CSPCa group, and data on PSA concentration, prostate volume (PV), PSA density (PSAD), free PSA (FPSA)/TPSA, Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2.1 (PI-RADS v2.1) score, 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT imaging evaluation results and SUVmax were compared. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the independent predictors for CSPCa, thereby establishing a predictive model based on SUVmax that was evaluated by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analysis.

RESULTS

Compared to non-CSPCa, CSPCa patients had smaller PVs (median, 31.40 mL), lower FPSA/TPSA (median, 0.12), larger PSADs (median, 0.21 ng/mL2) and higher PI-RADS scores (P < 0.05). The prediction model comprising 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT maximal standardized uptake value, PV and FPSA/TPSA had the highest AUC of 0.927 compared with that of other predictors alone (AUCs of 0.585 for PSA, 0.652 for mpMRI and 0.850 for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT). The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the prediction model were 86.21% and 86.54%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Given the low diagnostic accuracy of regular PSA tests, a new prediction model based on the 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT SUVmax, PV and FPSA/TPSA was developed and validated, and this model could provide a more satisfactory predictive accuracy for CSPCa. This study provides a noninvasive prediction model with high accuracy for the diagnosis of CSPCa in the PSA gray zone, thus may be better avoiding unnecessary biopsy procedures.

Focal therapy of prostate cancer: Assessment with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) imaging

Focal therapy of prostate cancer (PCa) is currently of great interest, but a metric of success. other than biopsy, is not yet available. In a patient with a repeatedly negative MRI and negative systematic biopsies, a scan employing the radioisotope ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT identified a PSMA-avid hotspot in the prostate. PSMA-guided biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of a clinically-significant PCa. Following ablation of the lesion with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), the PSMA-avid lesion disappeared and targeted biopsy confirmed a fibrotic scar with no residual cancer. PSMA imaging may have a role in guiding diagnosis, focal ablation, and follow-up of men with PCa.

A Novel Risk Calculator Incorporating Clinical Parameters, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, and Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification Before Transperineal Prostate Biopsy

Background

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) can detect multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)-invisible prostate tumours and improve the sensitivity of detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in comparison to mpMRI alone. Numerous risk calculators have been validated as tools for stratification of men at risk of being diagnosed with clinically significant (cs)PCa.

Objective

To develop a novel risk calculator using clinical parameters and imaging parameters from mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT in a cohort of patients undergoing mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT before biopsy.

Design setting and participants

A total of 291 men from the PRIMARY prospective trial underwent mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT before transperineal prostate biopsy with sampling of systematic and targeted cores.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

Novel risk calculators were developed using multivariable logistic regression analysis to predict detection of overall PCa (International Society of Urological Pathology grade group [GG] ≥1) and csPCa (GG ≥2). The risk calculators were then compared with the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer risk calculator incorporating mpMRI (ERSPC-MRI). Resampling methods were used to evaluate the discrimination and calibration of the risk calculators and to perform decision curve analysis.

Results and limitations

Age, prostate-specific antigen, prostate volume, and mpMRI Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System scores were included in the MRI risk calculator, resulting in area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.791 for overall PCa (GG ≥1) and 0.812 for csPCa (GG ≥2). Addition of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) on PSMA PET/CT for the prostate lesion, and of SUVmax for the mpMRI lesions for the MRI-PSMA risk calculator resulted in AUCs of 0.831 for overall PCa and 0.876 for csPCa (≥ISUP2).The ERSPC-MRI risk calculator had AUCs of 0.758 (p = 0.02) for overall PCa and 0.805 (p = 0.001) for csPCa. Both the MRI and MRI-PSMA risk calculators were superior to the ERSPC-MRI for both overall PCa and csPCa.

Conclusions

These novel risk calculators incorporate clinical and radiological parameters for stratification of men at risk of csPCa. The risk calculator including PSMA PET/CT data is superior to a calculator incorporating mpMRI data alone.

Patient summary

We evaluated a new risk calculator that uses clinical information and results from two types of scan to predict the risk of clinically significant prostate cancer on prostate biopsy. This risk model can guide patients and clinicians in shared decision-making and may help in avoiding unnecessary prostate biopsies.

PSMA PET/CT: joint EANM procedure guideline/SNMMI procedure standard for prostate cancer imaging 2.0

Here we aim to provide updated guidance and standards for the indication, acquisition, and interpretation of PSMA PET/CT for prostate cancer imaging. Procedures and characteristics are reported for a variety of available PSMA small radioligands. Different scenarios for the clinical use of PSMA-ligand PET/CT are discussed. This document provides clinicians and technicians with the best available evidence, to support the implementation of PSMA PET/CT imaging in research and routine practice.

Three-dimensional ultrasound integrating nomogram and the blood flow image for prostate cancer diagnosis and biopsy: A retrospective study

Backgrounds

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the second most common male cancer in the world and based on its high prevalence and overwhelming effect on patients, more precise diagnostic and therapeutic methods are essential research topics. As such, this study aims to evaluate the value of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound (3D-TRUS) in the detection, diagnosis and biopsy of PCa, and to provide a basis for clinical practice of PCa.

Methods

Retrospective analysis and comparison of a total of 401 male patients who underwent prostate TRUS in our hospital from 2019 to 2020 were conducted, with all patients having prostate biopsy. Nomogram was used to estimate the probability of different ultrasound signs in diagnosing prostate cancer. The ROC curve was used to estimate the screening and diagnosis rates of 3D-TRUS, MRI and TRUS for prostate cancer.

Results

A total of 401 patients were randomly divided into two groups according to different methods of prostate ultrasonography, namely the TRUS group (251 patients) and the 3D-TRUS group (150 patients). Of these cases, 111 patients in 3D-TRUS group underwent MRI scan. The nomogram further determined the value of 3D-TRUS for prostate cancer. The ROC AUC of prostate cancer detected by TRUS, MRI and 3D-TRUS was 0.5580, 0.6216 and 0.6267 respectively. Biopsy complications were lower in 3D-TRUS group than TRUS group, which was statistically significant (P&lt;0.005).

Conclusions

The accuracy of 3D-TRUS was higher in diagnosis and biopsy of prostate cancer. Meanwhile, the positive rate of biopsy could be improved under direct visualization of 3D-TRUS, and the complications could be decreased markedly. Therefore, 3D-TRUS was of high clinical value in diagnosis and biopsy of prostate cancer.

Modern paradigms for prostate cancer detection and management

Early detection and management of prostate cancer has evolved over the past decade, with a focus now on harm minimisation and reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment, given the proven improvements in survival from randomised controlled trials. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is now an important aspect of the diagnostic pathway in prostate cancer, improving the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, enabling accurate localisation of appropriate sites to biopsy, and reducing unnecessary biopsies in most patients with normal magnetic resonance imaging scans. Biopsies are now performed transperineally, substantially reducing the risk of post-procedure sepsis. Australian-led research has shown that prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has superior accuracy in the staging of prostate cancer than conventional imaging (CT and whole-body bone scan). Localised prostate cancer that is low risk (International Society for Urological Pathology [ISUP] grade 1, Gleason score 3 + 3 = 6; and ISUP grade group 2, Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 with less than 10% pattern 4) can be offered active surveillance, reducing harms from overtreatment. Prostatectomy and definitive radiation remain the gold standard for localised intermediate and high risk disease. However, focal therapy is an emerging experimental treatment modality in Australia in carefully selected patients. The management of advanced prostate cancer treatment has evolved to now include several novel agents both in the metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration-resistant disease settings. Multimodal therapy with androgen deprivation therapy, additional systemic therapy and radiotherapy are often recommended. PSMA-based radioligand therapy has emerged as a treatment option for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and is currently being evaluated in earlier disease states.

Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Diagnosis Without Histological Proof: A Possibility in the Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Era?

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has resulted in a reduction in the number of patients indicated for prostate biopsy. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has recently shown additional value in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Combining these imaging modalities allows such specific prediction of the presence of csPCa that the need for histological confirmation may be obsolete. We retrospectively analyzed PSMA PET/CT scans performed in the primary staging of PCa in the past 2 yr in our center (n = 451). All 74 patients with a PSMA ligand maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of ≥16 had csPCa (grade group ≥2). Of the 185 patients with a combination of a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System score ≥4 and SUVmax ≥8, 98% had csPCa. A nomogram combining predictive factors should be developed to identify patients in whom biopsy could theoretically be avoided. Nevertheless, biopsy will remain indispensable in patients with indefinite risk of csPCa and can provide important additional information.

Patient summary

Using patient data from our center, we found that addition of a special type of scan based on prostate-specific membrane antigen could help in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer without the need for prostate biopsy. Direct therapy without biopsy confirmation of cancer might be possible for a highly select group of patients.