1
|
Hagens MJ, Luining WI, Boevé LMS, Knol RJJ, Roeleveld TA, Srbljin S, Weltings S, Koppes JCC, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG. The appropriateness of PSMA PET/CT in newly diagnosed unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients-towards a tumor volume-based risk stratification. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024:10.1038/s41391-024-00899-9. [PMID: 39313655 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-024-00899-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2024] [Revised: 09/01/2024] [Accepted: 09/17/2024] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES This study reassesses the diagnostic value of PSMA PET/CT in unfavorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa) and validates the Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands (PCNN) subclassification. SUBJECTS/METHODS Men subjected to PSMA PET/CT were analyzed, evaluating the incidence of metastatic disease and its correlation with PCNN subgroups. RESULTS Metastatic disease was identified in 12.4% of patients. Higher PCNN subgroups correlated with increased metastatic potential; odds were significantly lower in low metastatic potential cases (OR: 0.19, 95% CI 0.06-0.62; p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Our findings reaffirm PSMA PET/CT's diagnostic value in unfavorable intermediate-risk PCa and validate the PCNN subclassification, reducing scan burden by 48.1%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marinus J Hagens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Wietske I Luining
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Remco J J Knol
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Ton A Roeleveld
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Srbljin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Weltings
- Department of Urology, Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, The Netherlands
| | - Jose C C Koppes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Henk G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital (NCI-AVL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Y, Song J, Yang L, Li W, Wang W, Ji A, Wang L, Wang F. The value of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the diagnosis of intracapsular prostate cancer with a poor prognosis. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:252. [PMID: 38954151 PMCID: PMC11219597 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-01127-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic value of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for intracapsular prostate cancer with a poor prognosis (PPC) and no extracapsular invasion or distant metastasis. METHODS The PET/CT images and clinical data of 221 patients were retrospectively analyzed. These patients all had clear pathological results. The maximum standard uptake value (SUVmax) of the main lesions was measured at the postprocessing workstation and was tested for correlation with the pathological score. The diagnostic accuracy was calculated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, and the best diagnostic threshold was calculated. The correlation between SUVmax and the International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) was also analyzed. RESULTS The pathological results of the 221 patients were 48 benign lesions and 173 malignant lesions, including 81 PPC. Low-, intermediate-, and high-risk prostate cancers made up 21.97% (38/173), 54.33% (94/173), and 23.70% (41/173) of the malignant lesions, respectively. SUVmax and GG were positively correlated (r = 0.54, P < 0.01). The best SUVmax thresholds for 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for the diagnosis of intracapsular PC and PPC were 7.95 and 13.94, respectively; the specificities were 0.83 and 0.85, the negative predictive values were 0.55 and 0.87, and the areas under the ROC curves were 0.88 and 0.88, respectively. CONCLUSION 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT has high specificity and NPV in the diagnosis of intracapsular PPC, but the sensitivity for the diagnosis of intracapsular low-risk PC is low, which may cause some cases to be undetected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yajing Wang
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Jieping Song
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Lulu Yang
- Department of Pathology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Wencheng Li
- Department of Urology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Wei Wang
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Aiqing Ji
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China
| | - Liwei Wang
- Department of Radiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
| | - Feng Wang
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, 68Th Changle Road, Nanjing, 210006, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hagens MJ, Ribbert LLA, Jager A, Veerman H, Barwari K, Boodt B, de Bruijn RE, Claessen A, Leter MR, van der Noort V, Smeenge M, Roeleveld TA, Rynja SP, Schaaf M, Weltings S, Vis AN, Bekers E, van Leeuwen PJ, van der Poel HG. Histopathological concordance between prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens-implications of transrectal and transperineal biopsy approaches. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 2024; 27:312-317. [PMID: 37660218 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-023-00714-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/18/2023] [Indexed: 09/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study aimed to evaluate the histopathological concordance rates between prostate biopsies and radical prostatectomy specimens according to the applied biopsy approach (transrectal or transperineal). METHODS We studied patients who had been newly diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer and who underwent a radical prostatectomy between 2018 and 2022. Patients were included if they underwent a prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging and if they had not been previously treated for prostate cancer. Histopathological grading on prostate biopsies was compared with that on radical prostatectomy specimens. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the effect of the applied biopsy approach on histopathological concordance. Additional analyses were performed to assess the effect of the applied biopsy approach on American Urological Association risk group migration, defined as any change in risk group after radical prostatectomy. RESULTS In total, 1058 men were studied, of whom 49.3% (522/1058) and 50.7% (536/1058) underwent transrectal and transperineal prostate biopsies, respectively. Histopathological disconcordance was observed in 37.8% (400/1058) of men while American Urological Association risk group migration was observed in 30.2% (320/1058) of men. A transperineal biopsy approach was found to be independently associated with higher histopathological concordance rates (OR 1.33 [95% CI 1.01-1.75], p = 0.04) and less American Urological Association risk group migration (OR 0.70 [95% CI 0.52-0.93], p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The use of a transperineal biopsy approach improved histopathological concordance rates compared to the use of a transrectal biopsy approach. A transperineal biopsy approach may provide more accurate risk stratification for clinical decision-making. Despite recent improvements, histopathologic concordance remains suboptimal and should be considered before initiating management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Hagens
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - L L A Ribbert
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - A Jager
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H Veerman
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - K Barwari
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Andros Clinics, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B Boodt
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Flevoziekenhuis, Almere, the Netherlands
| | - R E de Bruijn
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Ziekenhuis Amstelland, Amstelveen, the Netherlands
| | - A Claessen
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Rode Kruis Ziekenhuis, Beverwijk, the Netherlands
| | - M R Leter
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn, the Netherlands
| | - V van der Noort
- Department of Statistics, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - M Smeenge
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, St Jansdal Ziekenhuis, Harderwijk, the Netherlands
| | - T A Roeleveld
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Noordwest Ziekenhuisgroep, Alkmaar, the Netherlands
| | - S P Rynja
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Spaarne Gasthuis, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands
| | - M Schaaf
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, BovenIJ Ziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - S Weltings
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Zaans Medisch Centrum, Zaandam, the Netherlands
| | - A N Vis
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E Bekers
- Department of Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - P J van Leeuwen
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - H G van der Poel
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers location Boelelaan, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luining WI, Boevé LMS, Hagens MJ, Meijer D, de Weijer T, Ettema RH, Knol RJJ, Roeleveld TA, Srbljin S, Weltings S, Koppes JCC, van Moorselaar RJA, van Leeuwen PJ, Cysouw MCF, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN. A Comparison of Globally Applied Prognostic Risk Groups and the Prevalence of Metastatic Disease on Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol Oncol 2024:S2588-9311(24)00097-X. [PMID: 38693019 DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 03/13/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Various risk classification systems (RCSs) are used globally to stratify newly diagnosed patients with prostate cancer (PCa) into prognostic groups. OBJECTIVE To compare the predictive value of different prognostic subgroups (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk disease) within the RCSs for detecting metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) for primary staging, and to assess whether further subdivision of subgroups would be beneficial. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Patients with newly diagnosed PCa, in whom PSMA-PET/CT was performed between 2017 and 2022, were studied retrospectively. Patients were stratified into risk groups based on four RCSs: European Association of Urology, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), Cambridge Prognostic Group (CPG), and Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS The prevalence of metastatic disease on PSMA-PET/CT was compared among the subgroups within the four RCSs. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS In total, 2630 men with newly diagnosed PCa were studied. Any metastatic disease was observed in 35% (931/2630) of patients. Among patients classified as having intermediate- and high-risk disease, the prevalence of metastases ranged from approximately 12% to 46%. Two RCSs further subdivided these groups. According to the NCCN, metastatic disease was observed in 5.8%, 13%, 22%, and 62% for favorable intermediate-, unfavorable intermediate-, high-, and very-high-risk PCa, respectively. Regarding the CPG, these values were 6.9%, 13%, 21%, and 60% for the corresponding risk groups. CONCLUSIONS This study underlines the importance of nuanced risk stratification, recommending the further subdivision of intermediate- and high-risk disease given the notable variation in the prevalence of metastatic disease. PSMA-PET/CT for primary staging should be reserved for patients with unfavorable intermediate- or higher-risk disease. PATIENT SUMMARY The use of various risk classification systems in patients with prostate cancer helps identify those at a higher risk of having metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for primary staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wietske I Luining
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Marinus J Hagens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa de Weijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosemarijn H Ettema
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remco J J Knol
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Ton A Roeleveld
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department Urology, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Srbljin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Weltings
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands
| | - Jose C C Koppes
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reindert J A van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J van Leeuwen
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs C F Cysouw
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Luining WI, Hagens MJ, Meijer D, Ringia JB, de Weijer T, Bektas HO, Ettema RH, Knol RJ, Roeleveld TA, Srbljin S, Weltings S, Koppes JC, van Moorselaar RJ, van Leeuwen PJ, Oprea-Lager DE, Vis AN. The Probability of Metastases Within Different Prostate-specific Antigen Ranges Using Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer. EUR UROL SUPPL 2024; 59:55-62. [PMID: 38298765 PMCID: PMC10829602 DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2023.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and objectives The association between prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and probability of metastatic disease on prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) has not yet been established in patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer (PCa). Our objective was to assess the probability of metastatic disease within different PSA ranges using PSMA PET/CT for initial staging of PCa, and to identify both the anatomical distribution and the predictors of metastases on PSMA PET/CT. Methods In total, 2193 patients with newly diagnosed PCa were retrospectively studied. PSMA PET/CT was performed for staging purposes between January 2017 and May 2022. The proportion of patients with PSMA-avid metastases, stratified by PSA level, was studied. A vast majority of patients in whom at least one high-risk prognostic factor was present underwent PSMA PET/CT. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of metastases on PSMA PET/CT using clinical, biochemical, radiological, and pathological variables. Key findings and limitations The median PSA level at PSMA PET/CT was 14.1 ng/ml. Any metastatic disease (miN1-M1a-c) was observed in 34.7% (763/2193) of all patients and distant metastases (miM1a-c) in 25.4% (557/2193) of patients. The presence of any metastatic disease increased with PSA levels, being 15.4% in men with PSA levels <10 ng/ml and 87.5% in men with PSA levels >100 ng/ml. The multivariable logistic regression analysis found significant associations between the presence of any metastatic disease and PSA subgroups, clinical tumor stage ≥T2, grade group >3, and radiological tumor stage ≥T3b. Conclusions and clinical implications This is the first large epidemiological study in patients with PCa demonstrating the association between PSA subgroups and metastatic disease on modern imaging PSMA PET/CT. Data from this study can be used to counsel patients on the probability of metastatic disease at the time of PSA screening and to provide guidance on existing guidelines. Patient summary The prostate-specific antigen level could be used to assess the risk of metastases on prostate-specific membrane antigen positron (PSMA) emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT). This knowledge is valuable for selecting patients who will benefit most from metastatic screening with PSMA PET/CT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wietske I. Luining
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marinus J. Hagens
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dennie Meijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joanneke B. Ringia
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa de Weijer
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Huseyyin O. Bektas
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rosemarijn H. Ettema
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Remco J.J. Knol
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Noordwest Hospital, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Ton A. Roeleveld
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department Urology, Noordwest Hospital, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra Srbljin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands
| | - Saskia Weltings
- Department of Urology, Zaans Medical Center, Zaandam, The Netherlands
| | - Jose C.C. Koppes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Reindert J.A. van Moorselaar
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim J. van Leeuwen
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Urology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniela E. Oprea-Lager
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - André N. Vis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Prostate Cancer Network the Netherlands, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|