Pregnant Women's Experiences of the Conditions Affecting Marital Well-Being in High-Risk Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study

Care experiences and care expectations of hospitalized high-risk pregnant women: a qualitative study

Gaining insight into the prenatal care experiences and expectations of high-risk pregnant women is crucial for offering holistic care that aligns with their individualized needs. This study aimed at determining the care experiences and expectations of women with high-risk pregnancies. We adopted a descriptive qualitative approach in the research. The data were collected through in-depth interviews between March and June 2022. The participants included 27 high-risk pregnant women selected by purposive sampling. We analyzed the data using inductive content analysis. We utilized the Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ) checklist to report data. The participants' ages ranged from 22 to 40 years. The participants' gestational ages ranged from 29 to 38 weeks. We identified three themes, namely "Emotions felt in the course of pregnancy", "Care experiences; satisfaction and dissatisfaction", and "Expectations for ideal care". The findings showed that women experienced fear, stress, and anxiety while expecting supportive, attentive, and understanding care during the course of pregnancy. Our results revealed that high-risk pregnant women have some unmet care needs. Healthcare professionals should strive to provide individualized and holistic care for high-risk pregnant women.

Pregnant women's experiences of well-being in high-risk pregnancy: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Physical changes in high-risk pregnancy (HRP) can lead to changes in mood and social relationships and negative effects on women's well-being. Individuals in different sociocultural contexts have different perceptions of well-being. Yet, there is limited information about perceptions of well-being in HRP. This study aimed to explore the Iranian women's experiences of well-being in HRP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This qualitative study was conducted in 2019-2020 through directed content analysis based on the conceptual framework of well-being in HRP. Participants were 26 women with HRP purposively recruited from public and private healthcare settings in Mashhad, Iran. Face-to-face semistructured interviews were held for data collection until data saturation. Data were analyzed through directed content analysis proposed by Elo and kyngäs (2008) and were managed using the MAXQDA (v. 10) program.

RESULTS

Well-being in HRP had seven attributes in the five main dimensions of physical, mental-emotional, social, marital, and spiritual well-being. The seven attributes of well-being in HRP were controlled physical conditions, controlled mood, emotions, and affections, perceived threat, self-efficacy, and competence for multiple role performance, maintained social relationships, meaning seeking and relationship with the Creator, and positive marital relationships.

CONCLUSION

The present study provide an in-depth understanding about well-being in the Iranian women with HRP. It is a complex and multidimensional concept with physical, mental-emotional, social, marital, and spiritual dimensions. Comprehensive multicomponent interventions are needed to promote well-being among women with HRP and designed the guidelines to provide woman-centered care.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the High-Risk Pregnancy Well-Being Index in Mashhad: a methodological study

BACKGROUND

Assessment of well-being in high-risk pregnancy (HRP) is the key to achieve positive maternal and fetal outcomes. Although there are a wide range of instruments for well-being assessment, none of them is comprehensive for well-being assessment in HRP. The present study aimed at the development and psychometric evaluation of the High-Risk Pregnancy Well-Being Index (HRPWBI).

METHODS

This methodological study was conducted using the Waltz's four-step method. The dimensions of well-being in HRP were determined based on a conceptual model and the blueprint and the item pool of HRPWBI were developed. Then, the face and the content validity were assessed and item analysis was performed. Construct validity was also assessed through exploratory factor analysis with principal component analysis on the data obtained from 376 women with HRP in Mashhad, Iran. Finally, internal consistency, test-retest stability, sensitivity, and interpretability of HRPWBI were assessed.

RESULTS

The scale- content validity index (SCVI) of HRPWBI was 0.91. In factor analysis, 33 items were loaded on seven factors which explained 53.77% of the total variance. Internal consistency, relative stability, absolute stability, sensitivity, and interpretability of HRPWBI were confirmed with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.84, a test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97, a standard error of measurement of 0.92, a minimal detectable change of 8.09, and a minimal important change of 2.92, respectively.

CONCLUSION

HRPWBI is a valid and reliable instrument for well-being assessment among women with HRP. It can be used to assess well-being and the effects of well-being improvement interventions on well-being among women with HRP.

High-risk pregnant women's experiences of the receiving prenatal care in COVID-19 pandemic: a qualitative study

Background

Women with high-risk pregnancies are among the most vulnerable groups that require additional precautionary measures against the spread of COVID-19 plus receiving prenatal care. Yet, there is limited information on the status of prenatal care in women with high-risk pregnancies. The purpose of this study was to explore the experiences of women with high-risk pregnancies who were receiving prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods

The present qualitative study was conducted on mothers with high-risk pregnancies from September 2020 to March 2021. Purposeful sampling continued until achieving data saturation. Ghaem, Ommolbanin, and Imam Reza in Mashhad, Iran served as the research environment. Face-to-face and semi-structured interviews were effective data collection methods. Each interview lasted between 20 to 45 min (on average 30). The total number of participants was 31. Data analysis was carried out simultaneously with data collection using the qualitative content analysis method developed by Granheim and Landman (2004).

Results

Following the reduction and analysis of data from women in high-risk pregnancies, as well as their perceptions and experiences with health services during the COVID-19 pandemic, eight subcategories and three main categories were identified, including 1) “Negative psychology responses,” 2) “Adoption behavior,” and 3) “Adjustment of health services in mutual protection.”

Fear, anxiety, stress, feelings of loneliness, sadness, depression, guilt, doubt and conflict in receiving services were examples of negative psychological responses. The adaptive behaviors’ category reflected the behaviors of women with high-risk pregnancies in the context of the COVID COVID-19 pandemic. The Adjustment of health services in mutual protection indicated that health workers took preventive and protective measures against COVID-19, which, in addition to protecting themselves and their clients against COVID-19, gave women a sense of security.

Conclusion

Receiving prenatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic presents challenges for women with high-risk pregnancies, negatively impacting their psychological state and health-seeking behavior. Supportive and preventive care can ensure that women with high-risk pregnancies receive optimal prenatal care that focuses on COVID-19 prevention. We recommend implementing screening, psychological counseling, and education for women with high-risk pregnancies, as well as ensuring that they have access to women-centered health care services.