The Efficacy of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Approaches in Chronic Migraine: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The effectiveness of instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization on pain and function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization (IASTM) is popular in the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. However, the current literature has produced varying results. The purpose of this study was to collect the most recent studies to evaluate the effectiveness of IASTM on pain and function in patients with musculoskeletal disorders.

METHODS

The researchers searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases from inception to February 25, 2025, to identify randomized controlled trials comparing treatment groups receiving IASTM combined with other treatments to those receiving other treatments among participants with musculoskeletal disorders. The outcomes were pain intensity, pain pressure threshold and function. The Cochran Q and I² indices were used to estimate heterogeneity. The data were analyzed as the standardized mean difference (SMD). The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to rate the quality of evidence. Trial sequential analysis and sensitivity analyses were also performed.

RESULTS

Eleven trials (involving 427 participants) were included in the quantitative analysis. Six trials had a high risk of bias; three, unclear; and two, low. There was moderate-certainty evidence indicating that IASTM was effective in reducing patient-reported pain (n = 11) (n = 427, SMD = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.41 to 0.80, p < 0.01), and there was low-certainty evidence indicating that IASTM was effective in improving patient-reported function (n = 8) (n = 333, SMD = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.77, p < 0.05). Only one data point was extracted for the pain pressure threshold, and a meta-analysis was not performed. Trial sequential analysis revealed that the cumulative z score crossed the monitoring boundary for superiority for patient-reported pain in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain and cervicogenic headache at the 4-week IASTM.

CONCLUSIONS

IASTM can reduce patient-reported pain (with moderate certainty) and improve patient-reported function (with low certainty) in patients with musculoskeletal disorders. Future clinical studies do not need to explore the short-term effects of IASTM on patient-reported pain in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain and cervicogenic headache.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The PROSPERO registration ID is CRD42024534643 (April 10, 2024).

The glamor of and insights regarding hydrotherapy, from simple immersion to advanced computer-assisted exercises: A narrative review

Water-based therapy has been gaining attention in recent years and is being widely used in clinical settings. Hydrotherapy is the most important area of water-based therapy, and it has distinct advantages and characteristics compared to conventional land-based exercises. Several new techniques and pieces of equipment are currently emerging with advances in computer technologies. However, comprehensive reviews of hydrotherapy are insufficient. Hence, this study reviewed the status quo, mechanisms, adverse events and contraindications, and future prospects of the use of hydrotherapy. This study aims to comprehensively review the latest information regarding the application of hydrotherapy to musculoskeletal diseases, neurological diseases, and COVID-19. We have attempted to provide a "take-home message" regarding the clinical applications and mechanisms of hydrotherapy based on the latest evidence available.

Efficacy and safety of therapeutic exercise for primary dysmenorrhea: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

A growing number of research papers have looked at the influence of exercise on pain severity in people with primary dysmenorrhea, but the findings have been inconsistent. The purpose of this research was to thoroughly evaluate the impact of exercise on pain severity in individuals with primary dysmenorrhea and to find the best exercise regimen for these patients.

Methods

All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of exercise for patients with primary dysmenorrhea were searched in the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, EBSCO, and CINAHL databases. The search time limit was set from the establishment of each database to 28 January 2025. Control groups included those receiving usual care, only providing health education, or no intervention at all. The outcome measure was pain intensity. The effect size was aggregated using the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). The methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool. Stata 15 software was used for meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and assessment of potential publication bias. R 4.4.1 software was used for network meta-analysis, area under curve ranking (SUCRA), league plot, and meta-regression.

Results

The analysis included a total of 29 studies that satisfied the criteria. Exercise decreased the visual analog scale (VAS, WMD = -2.62, 95% CI [-3.29, -1.95], p < 0.001) score in individuals with primary dysmenorrhea. Strength training (WMD = -1.76, 95% CI [-2.03, -1.48], p < 0.001), exercise duration of ≥8 weeks (WMD = -1.77, 95% CI [-1.87, -1.66], p < 0.001), frequency of >3 times per week (WMD = -1.60, 95% CI [-1.75, -1.45], p < 0.001), session length of >30 min (WMD = -2.20, 95% CI [-2.38, -2.02], p < 0.001), and a total of ≥90 min per week (WMD = -2.04, 95% CI [-2.19, -1.89], p < 0.001) showed superior efficacy in enhancing VAS (subgroup analyses).

Conclusion

Engaging in physical activity may reduce the intensity of discomfort encountered by individuals afflicted with primary dysmenorrhea, with strength training potentially emerging as the most efficacious alternative. The meta-analysis presents evidence that supports clinicians' advice to patients with primary dysmenorrhea, recommending that they exercise for a minimum of 8 weeks, with sessions occurring more than three times weekly and lasting longer than 30 min each. The goal is to achieve a minimum weekly total of 90 min by increasing the frequency of workouts.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024581879, CRD42024581879.

Effects of Dietary Interventions in Patients With Migraine: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Migraine is a disabling neurological disorder. Diet may be a factor to consider because measures of diet quality have been linked to both frequency and severity of attacks.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effects of dietary interventions on the clinical symptoms of migraine, quality of life, and body composition of patients with migraine.

DATA SOURCES

The MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Sciences databases were searched since database inception to February 13, 2024. We included articles on randomized clinical trials that assessed the effect dietary interventions on clinical symptoms of migraines and the quality of life and body composition of individuals with migraine.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data from the included articles were independently extracted by 2 researchers; another independent reviewer further verified the extractions. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to evaluate the risk of bias of selected studies, and the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale was used to assess the methodological quality.

RESULTS

Eight articles were included in this review. Of these, 3 reported on studies that assessed the ketogenic diet (KD), 2 reported on the Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and 3 reported on studies of other dietary strategies. Strong evidence exists regarding the effectiveness of the KD and DASH in reducing the frequency of migraine attacks, whereas their efficacy in improving patients' quality of life was supported only by limited evidence. There also is strong evidence regarding the effectiveness of DASH in reducing migraine's severity and patients' body weight. Insufficient evidence was found regarding the effectiveness of the other dietary interventions on all variables.

CONCLUSIONS

The DASH and KD may help reduce migraine frequency and severity. However, more high-quality studies are needed to confirm their effectiveness.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO No. CRD42024516161.

Hallmarks of primary headache: part 1 - migraine

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Migraine is a common disabling conditions which, globally, affects 15.2% of the population. It is the second cause of health loss in terms of years lived with disability, the first among women. Despite being so common, it is poorly recognised and too often undertreated. Specialty centres and neurologists with specific expertise on headache disorders have the knowledge to provide specific care: however, those who do not regularly treat patients with migraine will benefit from a synopsis on the most relevant and updated information about this condition. This paper presents a comprehensive view on the hallmarks of migraine, from genetics and diagnostic markers, up to treatments and societal impact, and reports the elements that identify migraine specific features.

MAIN RESULTS

The most relevant hallmark of migraine is that it has common and individual features together. Besides the known clinical manifestations, migraine presentation is heterogeneous with regard to frequency of attacks, presence of aura, response to therapy, associated comorbidities or other symptoms, which likely reflect migraine heterogeneous genetic and molecular basis. The amount of therapies for acute and for prophylactic treatment is really wide, and one of the difficulties is with finding the best treatment for the single patient. In addition to this, patients carry out different daily life activities, and might show lifestyle habits which are not entirely adequate to manage migraine day by day. Education will be more and more important as a strategy of brain health promotion, because this will enable reducing the amount of subjects needing specialty care, thus leaving it to those who require it in reason of refractory condition or presence of comorbidities.

CONCLUSIONS

Recognizing the hallmarks of migraine and the features of single patients enables prescribing specific pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments. Medical research on headaches today particularly suffers from the syndrome of single-disease approach, but it is important to have a cross-sectional and joint vision with other close specialties, in order to treat our patients with a comprehensive approach that a heterogeneous condition like migraine requires.

The effect of physical therapy integrated with pharmacotherapy on tension-type headache and migraine in children and adolescents

BACKGROUND

Tension-type headache (TTH) and migraine are prevalent neurological conditions in children and adolescents that significantly impact activity of daily living (ADL) and quality of life (QOL). Although physical therapy targeting cervical myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) on TTH and migraine has been extensively studied in adults, the efficacy in pediatric patients remains unexplored. The aim of this study is to reveal the effect of physical therapy integrated with pharmacotherapy on TTH and migraine in children and adolescents.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, observational cohort study recruiting consecutive patients aged 6 to 18 years with TTH and migraine with cervical MTrPs. They were classified into 4 types of headaches: frequent episodic TTH (FRTTH), chronic TTH (CTTH), episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). The once-weekly 40-minutes physical therapy session integrated with pharmacotherapy (integrated physical therapy) was continued until the treatment goals (headache days per week less than 2 days, headache impact test-6 (HIT-6) score to below of 50, and the ability to attend school daily) was achieved. Multifaceted assessments including headache frequency (headache days per week), headache intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), pain catastrophizing score (PCS), hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) score, HIT-6 scores, and EuroQol 5 dimensions 5-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5 L) scores, were conducted to evaluate the treatment effects.

RESULTS

161 patients were enrolled in this study. 106 patients (65.8%) were diagnosed with TTH: 70 (66.8%) with FETHH, 36 (34.0%) with CTTH, and 55 patients (34.2%) were diagnosed with migraine: 43 patients (78.2%) with EM, 12 patients (21.8%) with CM. We observed significant improvements in headache frequency, headache intensity, PCS, HADS score, HIT-6 scores, and EQ-5D-5 L scores before and after the treatment in all 4 types of headaches. The average number of sessions required to achieve the treatment goals was 4 times (weeks) for patients with FETTH and EM, 5.5 for those with CTTH, and 7.5 for those with chronic migraine.

CONCLUSION

The integrated physical therapy on pediatric TTH and migraine patients with the cervical MTrPs was significantly effective in reducing headache symptoms and improving ADL and QOL.

Is physiotherapy in migraines known to sufferers? A cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Migraine, a prevalent neurological condition, often impairs daily functioning and quality of life. While medications are the primary treatment, the potential of physiotherapy as an integrative approach remains underexplored. The aim of the study was to explore the awareness and experience of migraine patients regarding physiotherapy as a complementary treatment.

METHODS

A comprehensive survey was conducted on 200 migraine patients. Data collected included demographics, diagnosis, Migraine Disability Assessment Score Questionnaire (MIDAS) scores, and perceptions and experiences related to physiotherapy.

RESULTS

The average age of participants was 47.7 ± 13.2 years, with a predominance of females, 149 out of 200 (74.5%). The mean MIDAS score was 36.7 ± 45.3, indicating a significant impact on daily life. While 39 out of 200 (19.5%) had undergone physiotherapy for their headache, 161 out of 200 (80.5%) had not. Of those who had, 22 out of 39 (56.4%) reported benefits, including reduced attack intensity and frequency. Interestingly, 145 out of 161 (90.1%) expressed interest in physiotherapy, with many expecting it to reduce attack intensity, 57 out of 200 (28.5%) and frequency, 77 out of 200 (38.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The study highlights the substantial burden of migraines and the potential of physiotherapy as an adjunctive treatment. Increasing awareness and accessibility to physiotherapy could offer migraine patients a more holistic treatment approach; however, randomized controlled trials are mandatory in order to confirm its efficacy.