Supramaximal stimulation during intraoperative facial nerve monitoring as a simple parameter to predict early functional outcome after parotidectomy

Predicting postoperative facial nerve paralysis by using intraoperative nerve monitoring during parotid surgery

OBJECTIVES

To investigate a method for predicting postoperative facial nerve paralysis (POFNP) during parotid surgery using intraoperative nerve monitoring (IONM).

METHODS

We assessed prediction for POFNP by using IONM, comparing between stimulation in the facial nerve trunk and each branch by using facial nerve monitoring. The amplitude response ratio (ARR) was calculated for the trunk/periphery. In addition, we then examined the correlation between ARR and time to recovery of paralyzed branches.

RESULTS

372 branches of 93 patients did not develop POFNP and were classified as group A. Among 20 patients who developed POFNP, 51 branches without POFNP were classified as group B, and 29 branches with POFNP were classified as group C. The ARR was approximately 1 in group A and B. but less than 0.5 in all branches in Group C. When the cut off value of ARR was set at 0.55, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of POFNP diagnosis by ARR were 96.5%, 93.1%, and 96.8%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Using IONM during parotid surgery enables easy prediction of POFNP.

Feasibility of facial nerve monitoring using adhesive surface electrodes during parotidectomy: a comparative study with needle electrodes

PURPOSE

Electrophysiological monitoring of the facial nerve during parotidectomy has been reported as an adjunctive method to prevent facial nerve injury. Classically, a needle electrode is used to obtain electromyographic (EMG) signals from facial muscles during facial nerve monitoring (FNM) of parotid surgery, likewise adhesive surface electrodes. This study aimed to investigate the feasibility of performing FNM with surface electrodes during parotid surgery and to compare EMG values with needle electrodes.

METHODS

Thirty patients who underwent parotidectomy under FNM using adhesive surface and needle electrodes were included. Two pairs of adhesive surface electrodes and needle electrodes were used for FNM during parotid surgery. Mean amplitudes were collected after electrical facial nerve stimulation at 1 mA after specimen removal.

RESULTS

The mean amplitude of the adhesive surface electrodes was 226.50 ± 118.44 μV (orbicularis oculi muscle) and 469.6 ± 306.06 μV (orbicularis oris muscle), respectively. The mean amplitude of the needle electrodes was 449.85 ± 248.10 μV (orbicularis oculi muscle) and 654.66 ± 395.71 μV (orbicularis oris muscle), respectively. The mean amplitude of the orbicularis oris muscle was significantly greater than that of the orbicularis oculi. The amplitude values measured in the orbicularis oculi muscle showed significant differences between the needle and skin electrodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Facial nerve monitoring (FNM) using adhesive surface electrodes is feasible in parotid surgery. Although the mean amplitude value of the surface electrode was relatively lower than that of the needle electrode, the surface electrode is considered a feasible and safe EMG recording device for FNM in parotid surgery.

Proposals for Standardization of Intraoperative Facial Nerve Monitoring during Parotid Surgery

Intraoperative facial nerve monitoring (FNM) has been widely accepted as an adjunct during parotid surgery to facilitate identification of the facial nerve (FN) main trunk, dissection of FN branches, confirmation of FN function integrity, detection of FN injury and prognostication of facial expression after tumor resection. Although the use of FNM in parotidectomy is increasing, little uniformity exists in its application from the literature. Thus, not only are the results of many studies difficult to compare but the value of FNM technology is also limited. The article reviews the current literature and proposes our standardized FNM procedures during parotid surgery, such as standards in FNM setup, standards in general anesthesia, standards in FNM procedures and application of stimulus currents, interpretation of electrophysiologic signals and prediction of the facial expression outcome and pre-/post-operative assessment of facial expressions. We hope that the FNM standardized procedures will provide greater uniformity, improve the quality of applications and contribute to future research.

The potential applicability of facial nerve monitoring as a navigation tool in parotid gland surgery

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the stimulation amplitude and the distance to the facial nerve.

METHODS

This study was designed as a prospective clinical study. A total of 20 patients (12 males, 8 females) were included. Partial superficial parotidectomy was performed in all patients with intraoperative facial monitoring. Measurements were made on the main trunk and major branches. Stimulation was started at 1 mA and incrementally increased to 2 and 3 mA's. The shortest distance creating a robust response (>100 mV) was recorded.

RESULTS

At 1 mA, 2 mA and 3 mA stimulation intensity, the average distance between the tip of the stimulation probe and the main trunk was 2.20 ± 0.76 mm (range 1-3 mm), 3.80 ± 0.95 mm (range 2-5 mm), 4.80 ± 1.05 mm (range 3-7 mm) respectively. The stimulus intensity was inversely proportional in respect to the distance between the nerve and the tip of the stimulus probe (P < .00). The same relation was present in the facial nerve major branch measurements (P < .00).

CONCLUSION

The proportional stimulation amplitude and distance to the facial nerve is thought to be a reliable auxillary method to assist the surgeon by facilitating the estimation of the distance to the facial nerve during extracapsular dissection and minimally invasive cases where the facial nerve isn't routinely dissected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 3.

Correlation between Electrophysiological Change and Facial Function in Parotid Surgery Patients

This observational study investigated intraoperative electrophysiological changes and their correlation with postoperative facial expressions in parotidectomy patients with visual confirmation of facial nerve (FN) continuity. Maximal electromyography(EMG) amplitudes of the facial muscles corresponding to temporal, zygomatic, buccal and mandibular branches were compared before/after FN dissection, and facial function at four facial regions were evaluated before/after parotidectomy in 112 patients. Comparisons of 448 pairs of EMG signals revealed at least one signal decrease after FN dissection in 75 (67%) patients. Regional facial weakness was only found in 13 of 16 signals with >50% amplitude decreases. All facial dysfunctions completely recovered within 6 months. EMG amplitude decreases often occur after FN dissection. An amplitude decrease >50% in an FN branch is associated with a high incidence of dysfunction in the corresponding facial region. This study tries to establish a standard facial nerve monitoring (FNM) procedure and a proper facial function grading system for parotid surgery that will be useful for the future study of FNM in parotid surgery.

Critical Review and Consensus Statement for Neural Monitoring in Otolaryngologic Head, Neck, and Endocrine Surgery

BACKGROUND

Enhancing patient outcomes in an array of surgical procedures in the head and neck requires the maintenance of complex regional functions through the protection of cranial nerve integrity. This review and consensus statement cover the scope of cranial nerve monitoring of all cranial nerves that are of practical importance in head, neck, and endocrine surgery except for cranial nerves VII and VIII within the temporal bone. Complete and applied understanding of neurophysiologic principles facilitates the surgeon's ability to monitor the at-risk nerve.

METHODS

The American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery (AAO-HNS) identified the need for a consensus statement on cranial nerve monitoring. An AAO-HNS task force was created through soliciting experts on the subject. Relevant domains were identified, including residency education, neurophysiology, application, and various techniques for monitoring pertinent cranial nerves. A document was generated to incorporate and consolidate these domains. The panel used a modified Delphi method for consensus generation.

RESULTS

Consensus was achieved in the domains of education needs and anesthesia considerations, as well as setup, troubleshooting, and documentation. Specific cranial nerve monitoring was evaluated and reached consensus for all cranial nerves in statement 4 with the exception of the spinal accessory nerve. Although the spinal accessory nerve's value can never be marginalized, the task force did not feel that the existing literature was as robust to support a recommendation of routine monitoring of this nerve. In contrast, there is robust supporting literature cited and consensus for routine monitoring in certain procedures, such as thyroid surgery, to optimize patient outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The AAO-HNS Cranial Nerve Monitoring Task Force has provided a state-of-the-art review in neural monitoring in otolaryngologic head, neck, and endocrine surgery. The evidence-based review was complemented by consensus statements utilizing a modified Delphi method to prioritize key statements to enhance patient outcomes in an array of surgical procedures in the head and neck. A precise definition of what actually constitutes intraoperative nerve monitoring and its benefits have been provided.

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit expression in the gastrocnemius and in the orbicularis oris before and after facial nerve injury in rats

Objectives: To observe the expression of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor (AChR) subunits in normal orbicularis oris and gastrocnemius muscles and to explore the relationships between the expression of AChR subunits and the severity of facial nerve injury. Methods: Gene and protein expression of AChR subunits in the orbicularis oris and gastrocnemius muscles of male Sprague-Dawley rats was measured by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and western blotting, respectively, 1-90 days after graded facial nerve injury. Results: Expression of ε-AChR in the normal orbicularis oris was significantly higher than that in the gastrocnemius, whereas no γ subunit expression was observed. Expression of α, β, δ, ε, and γ subunits was upregulated in the orbicularis oris and was positively correlated with the degree of facial nerve injury. Discussion: We demonstrated the higher expression of the AChR subunits in the orbicularis oris, compared to gastrocnemius muscles. The differences in expression of these subunits between muscles innervated by the facial nerve and somatic nerves and the correlation of AChR subunit expression with the degree of facial nerve injury yield insights into the sensitivity to muscle relaxants during intraoperative facial nerve monitoring.

Contemporary Management of Benign and Malignant Parotid Tumors

To report the standard of care, interesting new findings and controversies about the treatment of parotid tumors. Relevant and actual studies were searched in PubMed and reviewed for diagnostics, treatment and outcome of both benign and malignant tumors. Prospective trials are lacking due to rarity of the disease and high variety of tumor subtypes. The establishment of reliable non-invasive diagnostics tools for the differentiation between benign and malignant tumors is desirable. Prospective studies clarifying the association between different surgical techniques for benign parotid tumors and morbidity are needed. The role of adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy in securing loco-regional control and improving survival in malignant disease is established. Prospective clinical trials addressing the role of chemotherapy/molecular targeted therapy for parotid cancer are needed. An international consensus on the classification of parotid surgery techniques would facilitate the comparison of different trials. Such efforts should lead into a clinical guideline.

The effect of partial superficial parotidectomy on amplitude, latency and threshold of facial nerve stimulation

The aim of this study is to assess the effect of partial superficial parotidectomy and facial nerve dissection to electrophysiologic parameters of intraoperative facial nerve monitoring such as nerve stimulation threshold, stimulus amplitude and latency. Twenty-five patients who underwent partial superficial parotidectomy for benign parotid gland mass were included in the study. After the identification of the facial nerve main trunk, minimum stimulation threshold, latencies and amplitudes of the orbicularis oculi (electrode 1) and orbicularis oris (electrode 2) electrodes at 0.50 milliamperes (mA) were recorded. All of the recordings were repeated after the completion of parotidectomy. Median nerve dissection duration was calculated and size of the tumors was measured during macroscopic pathology. The median minimum nerve stimulation threshold was 0.15 mA [interquartile range (IQR) = 0.05] before and 0.15 mA (IQR = 0.08) after the parotidectomy (p = 0.02). Median nerve dissection duration was 49 min (IQR = 38). Median amplitude and latency in electrode 1 before and after the facial nerve dissection were 322 millivolts (mV) (IQR = 330), 370 mV (IQR = 370) (p = 0.02), 3 milliseconds (ms) (IQR = 1) and 4 ms (IQR = 2) (p = 0.05), respectively. Median amplitude and latency in electrode 2 before and after the facial nerve dissection were 396 mV (IQR = 275), 365 mV (IQR = 836) (p = 0.86), 3 ms (IQR = 1.5) and 4 ms (IQR = 1.5) (p = 0.17), respectively. Minimal nerve stimulation threshold and amplitude of electrode 1 were affected by facial nerve dissection among the electrophysiologic parameters (p = 0.02 and p = 0.02). Of the electrophysiological parameters only the latency of electrode 2 was significantly correlated with tumor size (p = 0.03). Besides, none of the parameters were predictive for a possible postoperative facial nerve dysfunction regarding superficial partial parotidectomy.