Tone Decay at Threshold with Auditory Electrical Stimulation in Digisonic Cochlear Implantees:Fatiga del tono a nivel umbral al realizar estimulación eléctrica auditiva con implantes cocleares Digisonic

Tone Decay Reconsidered: Preliminary Results of a Prospective Study in Hearing-Aid Users with Moderate to Severe Hearing Loss

Among hearing aid (HA) users, there is a considerable variability in word recognition scores (WRSs). This variability is most pronounced among individuals with moderately severe to severe hearing loss. The variability cannot be adequately explained by factors such as pure-tone audiogram, audiogram type or age. This prospective study was designed to investigate the relationship between tone decay (TD) and WRS in a group of HA users with corresponding pure-tone hearing loss. The study population included 22 patients with hearing loss between 50 and 80 dB HL. Aided WRS, unaided WRS and TD were assessed for both ears. TD was found to be frequency-dependent. TD and WRS were correlated, with up to R = -0.66. The TD test was revealed to be a feasible method for explaining variability in WRS among HA users with hearing loss below 80 dB. This may contribute to improved differential diagnostics. The TD test may thus offer a better understanding of the limitations of HA use in the context of cochlear implant candidacy assessment for HA users.

Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? Part 2: On electrically evoked late auditory responses

The purpose of this study was to distinguish the effects of different parameters on latencies of wave N1, wave P2, and inter-peak interval N1-P2 of electrical late auditory responses (ELARs). ELARs were recorded from four intra-cochlear electrodes in fourteen adult HiRes90K cochlear implant users who had at least three months of experience. The relationship between latencies and stimulation sites in the cochlea was characterized to assess the influence of the auditory pathway anatomy on ELARs, i.e., whether the speed of neural propagation varies according to the place that is activated in the cochlea. Audiograms before implantation, duration of deafness, and psychophysics at first fitting were used to describe the influence of deafness characteristics on latencies. The stimulation sites were found to have no effect on ELAR latency and, while there was no influence of psychophysics on latency, a strong relationship was shown with duration of deafness and the pre-implantation audiogram. Thus, ELAR latency was longer for poorer audiograms and longer durations of deafness and this relationship appeared to be independent of stimulation parameters such as stimulation site. Comparison between these findings and those from the equivalent study on EABR waves IIIe and Ve latency [Guiraud, J., Gallego, S., Arnold, L., Boyle, P., Truy, E., Collet, L., 2007. Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses. Hear. Res. 223 (1-2), 48-60] shows that, while ELAR and EABR latencies are related with parameters that reflect the integrity of the auditory pathway, ELAR latency is less dependent on stimulation parameters than EABR latency.

Effects of auditory pathway anatomy and deafness characteristics? (1): On electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses

The purpose of this study was to distinguish the effects of different parameters on latencies of wave IIIe, wave Ve, and interpeak interval IIIe-Ve of electrical auditory brainstem responses (EABRs). EABRs were recorded from all the intra-cochlear electrodes in eight adult HiRes90K((R)) cochlear implant users. The relationship between latencies and stimulation sites in the cochlea was characterized to assess activity along the auditory pathway. Audiograms before implantation, psychophysics at first fitting and duration of deafness were used to describe the influence of deafness on latencies. A decreasing baso-apical latency gradient was found for waves IIIe and Ve, while the interpeak interval IIIe-Ve remained the same along the electrode array. Electrical stimulation enabling to stimulate various parts of the cochlea at the same time, this could indicate an anatomical way of compensating for the delay the acoustic wave takes to reach the cochlea apex in a non-implanted ear. However, psychophysical levels were also found to increase at the cochlear base showing that the latency gradient could result from an increasing gradient of neural degeneration toward the base. Correlations of EABR latencies with psychophysics, audiometric data and duration of deafness show that factors linked to deafness have indeed an influence on EABR latencies. The possible explanations for the latency shift observed, whether they are anatomical and/or pathological, are exposed.

Loudness adaptation in acoustic and electric hearing

The present study is aimed to evaluate and compare loudness adaptation between normal hearing and cochlear-implant subjects. Loudness adaptation for 367-s pure tones was measured in five normal-hearing subjects at three frequencies (125, 1,000, and 8,000 Hz) and three levels (30, 60, and 90 dB SPL). In addition, loudness adaptation for 367-s pulse trains was measured in five Clarion cochlear-implant subjects at three stimulation rates (100, 991, and 4,296 Hz), three levels (10, 50, and 90% of the electric dynamic range), three stimulation positions (apical, middle and basal), and two stimulation modes (monopolar and bipolar). The method of successive magnitude estimation was used to quantify loudness adaptation. Similar to the previous results, we found that loudness adaptation in normal-hearing subjects increases with decreasing level and increasing frequency. However, we also found a small but significant loudness enhancement at 90 dB SPL in acoustic hearing. Despite large individual variability, we found that loudness adaptation in cochlear-implant subjects increases with decreasing levels, but is not significantly affected by the rate, place and mode of stimulation. A phenomenological model was proposed to predict loudness adaptation as a function of stimulus frequency and level in acoustic hearing. The present results were not fully compatible with either the restricted excitation hypothesis or the neural adaptation hypothesis. Loudness adaptation may have a central component that is dependent on the peripheral excitation pattern.