Early morning glycaemia and the metabolic consequences of delaying breakfast/morning insulin. A comparison of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple injection therapy with human isophane or human ultralente insulin at bedtime in insulin-dependent diabetics

Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) versus multiple insulin injections for type 1 diabetes mellitus

BACKGROUND

Type 1 diabetes is a metabolic disorder resulting from a defect in insulin secretion. Onset of type 1 diabetes mellitus may occur at any age and it is one of the most common chronic diseases of childhood and adolescence. Since there are no interventions known to prevent onset, it is vital that effective treatment regimes are available. Glycaemic control is maintained by replacement of insulin and may be in the form of 'conventional' insulin therapy (multiple injections per day) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of CSII compared to multiple insulin injections (MI) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were obtained from electronic searches of The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were included if they were randomised controlled trials comparing CSII with three or more insulin injections per day (MI) in people with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently assessed risk of bias and extracted characteristics of included studies. Authors contacted study investigators to obtain missing information. Generic inverse variance meta-analyses using a random-effects model were performed.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty three studies randomised 976 participants with type 1 diabetes to either intervention. There was a statistically significant difference in glycosylated haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) favouring CSII (weighted mean difference -0.3% (95% confidence interval -0.1 to -0.4). There were no obvious differences between the interventions for non-severe hypoglycaemia, but severe hypoglycaemia appeared to be reduced in those using CSII. Quality of life measures suggest that CSII is preferred over MI. No significant difference was found for weight. Adverse events were not well reported, no information is available on mortality, morbidity and costs.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence to suggest that CSII may be better than MI for glycaemic control in people with type 1 diabetes. Non-severe hypoglycaemic events do not appear to be reduced with CSII. There is insufficient evidence regarding adverse events, mortality, morbidity and costs.

Blood glucose control on Sunday in IDDM patients: intensified conventional insulin therapy versus continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion

We have assessed the capacity of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) to maintain good blood glucose metabolic control on Sundays, when waking is delayed, with reference to intensified conventional insulin therapy by multiple daily injections (MDI). The study lasted 3 weeks, including 3 week-ends. A total of 20 IDDM patients were selected for metabolic control: ten were treated by CSII and ten by MDI. Blood glucose was determined at least three times a day (fasting on waking, pre-lunch and pre-dinner). The times of blood glucose determinations and their values were recorded in a memory reflectance meter. Waking, the first blood glucose measurement and the first insulin injection (MDI) or bolus (CSII) were about 1 h later on Sundays than on a weekday (44 +/- 4 min in MDI group, P < 0.04; and 59 +/- 7 min in CSII group, P < 0.02). The times of the pre-lunch and pre-dinner blood glucose determinations were not significantly different. The mean waking and pre-lunch blood glucose values of the MDI group were higher on Sundays (11.5 +/- 3.8 and 9.7 +/- 4.5 mmol/l) than on weekdays (8.7 +/- 2.3 and 7.1 +/- 2.5 mmol/1)(P < 0.01). The pre-prandial blood glucose levels of the CSII group on Sundays and weekdays were not statistically different at any time. Changes in the waking time and the subsequent delay in the first insulin bolus on Sunday may alter blood glucose control in patients on MDI, but CSII allows such changes without any glycemic side effects.

Intravenous infusion of diarginylinsulin, an insulin analogue: effects on glucose turnover and lipid levels in insulin-treated type II diabetic patients

Diarginylinsulin is an intermediate in the conversion of proinsulin to insulin and is usually present in small amounts in vivo in humans. This study was designed to evaluate the following in insulin-treated type II diabetic patients: (1) the feasibility of an overnight intravenous infusion of diarginylinsulin, as compared with an overnight intravenous infusion of short-acting insulin, and the degree of early morning glycemic control; and (2) the effects of diarginylinsulin and human insulin on hepatic glucose production (HGO) in the postabsorptive state and on the glucose turnover rate and peripheral insulin sensitivity during an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Diarginylinsulin and regular human insulin maintained a comparable degree of normoglycemia during the night, without significant glucose increases in the morning. Free-diarginylinsulin and free-insulin concentrations were not significantly different, and (HGO) was 2.1 +/- 0.5 versus 2.1 +/- 0.4 mg/kg/min with diarginylinsulin and regular human insulin, respectively (NS). During the euglycemic clamp, glucose infusion rate per unit of diarginylinsulin or human insulin infused (M/I ratio) was similar, and HGO was equally suppressed with diarginylinsulin and regular human insulin. No significant differences were seen in NEFA and triglyceride levels. In conclusion, these results indicate that diarginylinsulin is as potent as regular human insulin; it is normalizes HGO in the postabsorptive state; and its hepatic and peripheral actions on glucose and lipids are comparable to those of human insulin during an euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp.