1
|
Moraes-Filho JPP, Domingues G, Chinzon D. BRAZILIAN CLINICAL GUIDELINE FOR THE THERAPEUTIC MANAGEMENT OF GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASE (BRAZILIAN FEDERATION OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, FBG). ARQUIVOS DE GASTROENTEROLOGIA 2024; 61:e23154. [PMID: 38511797 DOI: 10.1590/s0004-2803.24612023-154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 11/29/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) is a prevalent condition in Brazil, affecting 12% to 20% of the urban population, with significant implications for patient quality of life and potential for complications. OBJECTIVE This paper focuses on the recent update of the Brazilian guidelines for GERD, a necessary revision due to advancements in knowledge and practice since the last publication over a decade ago. The update pays particular attention to the role and safety of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), acknowledging the growing concerns about their long-term use, adverse events, and overprescription. METHODS The methodology of the guideline update involved an extensive literature review in multiple languages (English, French, Italian, Spanish, and Portuguese), drawing from major databases such as Medline, Embase, and SciELO-Lilacs. RESULTS This comprehensive approach resulted in a carefully curated selection of studies, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, specifically focusing on PPIs and other therapeutic strategies for GERD. The updated guidelines are presented in a user-friendly question-and-answer format, adhering to the PICO system (Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes) for clarity and ease of interpretation. The recommendations are supported by robust scientific evidence and expert opinions, enhancing their practical applicability in clinical settings. To ensure the reliability and clarity of the recommendations, the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) was employed. This system categorizes the strength of recommendations as strong, weak, or conditional and classifies evidence quality as high, moderate, low, or very low. These classifications provide insight into the confidence level of each recommendation and the likelihood of future research impacting these guidelines. CONCLUSION The primary aim of these updated guidelines is to offer practical, evidence-based advice for the management of GERD in Brazil, ensuring that healthcare professionals are equipped with the latest knowledge and tools to deliver optimal patient care. BACKGROUND •Gastrointestinal specialists rely heavily on guidelines to manage digestive pathologies effectively. The Brazilian clinical guideline for therapeutic management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is an invaluable tool for these specialists. BACKGROUND •It critically analyzes practical aspects of therapy through 12 questions covering a wide range of topics, from behavioral measures to surgical and endoscopic indications. BACKGROUND •The recommendations in this guideline are justified using the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation), and experienced experts provide comments and suggestions at the end of each question.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gerson Domingues
- Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil
| | - Decio Chinzon
- Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, SP, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fass R, Vaezi M, Sharma P, Yadlapati R, Hunt B, Harris T, Smith N, Leifke E, Armstrong D. Randomised clinical trial: Efficacy and safety of on-demand vonoprazan versus placebo for non-erosive reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 58:1016-1027. [PMID: 37750406 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17728] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) symptoms are often episodic, making on-demand treatment an attractive treatment approach. AIMS We compared the efficacy and safety of on-demand vonoprazan versus placebo in patients with NERD. METHODS Patients with NERD, defined as heartburn for ≥6 months and for ≥4/7 consecutive days with normal endoscopy, received once-daily vonoprazan 20 mg during a 4-week run-in period. Patients without heartburn during the last 7 days and with ≥80% study drug and diary compliance were randomised 1:1:1:1 to vonoprazan 10, 20, 40 mg or placebo on-demand for 6 weeks. The primary endpoint was the percentage of evaluable heartburn episodes completely relieved within 3 h of on-demand dosing and sustained for 24 h. RESULTS Of 458 patients in the run-in period, 207 entered the on-demand period. In the vonoprazan 10 mg group, 56.0% (201/359) of evaluable heartburn episodes met the criteria for complete and sustained relief; 60.6% (198/327) in the 20 mg group; and 70.0% (226/323) in the 40 mg group, compared with 27.3% (101/370) in the placebo group (p < 0.0001 versus placebo for each vonoprazan group). By 1 h post-dose, vonoprazan was associated with complete relief of significantly more heartburn episodes compared with placebo. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION On-demand vonoprazan may be a potential alternative to continued daily acid suppression therapy for the relief of episodic heartburn in patients with NERD. CLINICALTRIALS gov: NCT04799158.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronnie Fass
- The Esophageal and Swallowing Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, MetroHealth Medical System, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Michael Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Prateek Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansas City VA Medical Center, Kansas City, Missouri, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Rena Yadlapati
- Division of Gastroenterology, Center for Esophageal Diseases, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Barbara Hunt
- Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Research and Development, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, USA
| | - Tom Harris
- Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Research and Development, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, USA
| | - Neila Smith
- Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Research and Development, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, USA
| | - Eckhard Leifke
- Phathom Pharmaceuticals, Research and Development, Buffalo Grove, Illinois, USA
| | - David Armstrong
- Division of Gastroenterology, Farncombe Family Digestive Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jung DH, Youn YH, Jung HK, Kim SY, Huh CW, Shin CM, Oh JH, Huh KC, Park MI, Choi SC, Kim KB, Park SY, Kwon JG, Cho YK, Park JH, Shin JE, Gong EJ, Kim JH, Hong SJ, Kim HJ, Jee SR, Lee JY, Jung KW, Kim HM, Lee KJ. On-demand Versus Continuous Maintenance Treatment With a Proton Pump Inhibitor for Mild Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Study. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2023; 29:460-469. [PMID: 37814436 PMCID: PMC10577461 DOI: 10.5056/jnm23130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims It remains unclear which maintenance treatment modality is most appropriate for mild gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). We aimed to compare on-demand treatment with continuous treatment using a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) in the maintenance treatment for patients with non-erosive GERD or mild erosive esophagitis. Methods Patients whose GERD symptoms improved after 4 weeks of standard dose PPI treatment were prospectively enrolled at 25 hospitals. Subsequently, the enrolled patients were randomly assigned to either an on-demand or a continuous maintenance treatment group, and followed in an 8-week interval for up to 24 weeks. Results A total of 304 patients were randomized to maintenance treatment (continuous, n = 151 vs on-demand, n = 153). The primary outcome, the overall proportion of unwillingness to continue the assigned maintenance treatment modality, failed to confirm the non-inferiority of on-demand treatment (45.9%) compared to continuous treatment (36.1%). Compared with the on-demand group, the GERD symptom and health-related quality of life scores significantly more improved and the overall satisfaction score was significantly higher in the continuous treatment group, particularly at week 8 and week 16 of maintenance treatment. Work impairment scores were not different in the 2 groups, but the prescription cost was less in the on-demand group. Serum gastrin levels significantly elevated in the continuous treatment group, but not in the on-demand group. Conclusions Continuous treatment seems to be more appropriate for the initial maintenance treatment of non-erosive GERD or mild erosive esophagitis than on-demand treatment. Stepping down to on-demand treatment needs to be considered after a sufficient period of continuous treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Da Hyun Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Youn
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Kyung Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheal Wung Huh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yongin Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Cheol Min Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Jung-Hwan Oh
- Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyu Chan Huh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Moo In Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Suck Chei Choi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Jeollabuk-do, Korea
| | - Ki Bae Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chungbuk National University School of Medicine, Cheongju, Chungcheongbuk-do, Korea
| | - Seon-Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Joong Goo Kwon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Daegu Catholic University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Yu Kyung Cho
- Catholic Photomedicine Research Institute, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ho Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Eun Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dankook University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Chungcheongnam-do, Korea
| | - Eun Jeong Gong
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon-do, Korea
| | - Jae Hak Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Dongguk University College of Medicine, Goyang, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Su Jin Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Bucheon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Hyun Jin Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Changwon, Gyeongsangnam-do, Korea
| | - Sam Ryong Jee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Busan Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Ju Yup Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Kee Wook Jung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Man Kim
- Health Promotion, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Jae Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Matsuda S, Kato M, Sakakibara Y, Hamada H, Sasaki Y, Mori H, Hirai Y, Inoue S, Toyokawa T, Kagaya T, Kuwai T, Esaka N, Yamashita H, Watanabe N, Matsumoto M, Fujii H, Demura M, Kubo K, Mabe K, Harada N. A study for every second day administration of vonoprazan for maintenance treatment of erosive GERD (ESD von GERD): a multicenter randomized cross-over study. J Gastroenterol 2022; 57:133-143. [PMID: 35092498 DOI: 10.1007/s00535-022-01850-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vonoprazan is a potassium competitive acid blocker used to treat erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with stronger, more stable acid-suppressing effects than proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). This study clarified the usefulness and superiority of vonoprazan administered every second day over PPIs in the maintenance therapy of erosive GERD. METHODS This is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, two-period randomized cross-over study. Patients were randomized to either the vonoprazan-lansoprazole (VP-LZ) group, who were given vonoprazan 10 mg for the first 4 weeks and then lansoprazole 15 mg for the next 4 weeks both administered once every second day, or the lansoprazole-vonoprazan (LZ-VP) group, who were treated in reverse. GERD symptoms were compared using symptom diaries, the frequency scale for symptoms of GERD (FSSG), and the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale (GSRS). RESULTS We enrolled 122 patients between December 2017 and May 2019. Symptoms were well controlled in vonoprazan administration and lansoprazole administration were 93.6% and 82.1%, respectively, with a significant difference on McNemar's test (P = 0.003). During the second 4 weeks, 94.4% and 76.7% of patients in the VP-LZ and LZ-VP groups, respectively, were well controlled following for ≥ 6 consecutive days a week (P = 0.009). During the first 4 weeks, 96.7% and 80.0% of patients were well controlled with < 1 weekly in the VP-LZ and LZ-VP groups, respectively, during the first 4 weeks (P = 0.007). GERD symptoms, assessed via FSSG and GSRS, significantly decreased with vonoprazan administration once every second day. CONCLUSIONS Vonoprazan administered once every second day could be an effective alternative to PPIs in the maintenance treatment of erosive GERD (UMIN000030393).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soichiro Matsuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, 18-16, Kawahara-chou, Hakodate, Hokkaido, 041-8512, Japan
| | - Mototsugu Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, 18-16, Kawahara-chou, Hakodate, Hokkaido, 041-8512, Japan.
| | - Yuko Sakakibara
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshige Hamada
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Higashihiroshima Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideki Mori
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yuichiro Hirai
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Tokyo Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shuji Inoue
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kochi National Hospital, Kochi, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Toyokawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Fukuyama Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Takashi Kagaya
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kanazawa Medical Center, Ishikawa, Japan
| | - Toshio Kuwai
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Naoki Esaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Haruhiro Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Noriko Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Mie Chou Medical Center, Mie, Japan
| | - Mio Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hokkaido Medical Center, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Fujii
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Fukuokahigashi Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Mamiko Demura
- Department of Clinical Research, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kimitoshi Kubo
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, 18-16, Kawahara-chou, Hakodate, Hokkaido, 041-8512, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Mabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, 18-16, Kawahara-chou, Hakodate, Hokkaido, 041-8512, Japan
| | - Naohiko Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kang SJ, Jung HK, Tae CH, Kim SY, Lee KJ. On-demand Versus Continuous Maintenance Treatment of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease With Proton Pump Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Neurogastroenterol Motil 2022; 28:5-14. [PMID: 34980685 PMCID: PMC8748841 DOI: 10.5056/jnm21095] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Revised: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims Long-term maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is commonly used to prevent relapse of reflux symptoms; however, due to concerns about safety of long-term proton pump inhibitors (PPI) use, on-demand therapy is recommended as a long-term treatment modality. We compared the efficacy of on-demand and continuous PPI therapy for maintenance treatment of patients with GERD using meta-analysis. Methods Core electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing on-demand and continuous therapy in GERD patients. The primary outcome was treatment failure of maintenance therapy, and the secondary outcomes included symptomatic relief, patient satisfaction, and amount of PPI use. Results Overall, 11 studies were selected in the systematic review and meta-analysis. Compared with continuous PPI therapy, on-demand therapy showed similar outcomes for treatment failure (risk ratio, 1.26; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76-2.07), particularly in the non-erosive esophageal reflux disease and mild erosive reflux disease group (risk ratio, 1.48; 95% CI, 0.39-5.63). In studies including severe esophagitis patients, continuous PPI maintenance treatment was more effective (β, 0.127 [95% CI, 0.066-0.188]; P < 0.001). Severity of esophagitis was associated with higher efficacies of continuous maintenance therapy. The amount of daily PPI use was about half in the on-demand group compared to the continuous group (risk difference −0.52; 95% CI, −0.62-−0.42). Conclusions On-demand PPI therapy shows comparable efficacy to the continuous maintenance treatment in the non-erosive esophageal reflux disease and mild erosive reflux disease group, and can remarkably reduce the amount of PPI use. Therefore, on-demand therapy may be preferentially recommended in the maintenance treatment of GERD unaccompanied by severe esophagitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Joo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital Gangnam Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye-Kyung Jung
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chung Hyun Tae
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ewha Womans University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Young Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Korea University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang Jae Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Okanobu H, Kohno T, Mouri R, Hatsushika Y, Yamashita Y, Miyaki E, Fukuhara T, Okazaki A, Sakano A, Urabe A, Takaki S, Mori N, Tsuji K, Ochi H, Furukawa Y. Efficacy of vonoprazan 10 mg compared with 20 mg for the initial treatment in patients with erosive esophagitis: a randomized pilot study. Esophagus 2021; 18:669-675. [PMID: 33221955 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-020-00798-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 11/04/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The study aimed to investigate the efficacy of vonoprazan 10 mg compared with 20 mg in patients with erosive esophagitis. METHOD Seventy-three patients with erosive esophagitis were randomly divided into two groups either vonoprazan 20 mg (n = 37) or 10 mg (n = 36). They were administered each dose for 4 weeks as the initial treatment followed by maintenance treatment with 10 mg for 8 weeks. The primary endpoints were mucosal healing rate and symptom relief at 4 weeks. The secondary endpoint was symptom relief at 12 weeks after the maintenance treatment. Mucosal healing was assessed endoscopically, and symptom relief was assessed using the FSSG score. RESULTS At 4 weeks, the endoscopic healing rates of the 20 mg and 10 mg groups were 94.6% and 94.4%, respectively. The FSSG scores of the 20 mg and 10 mg groups were significantly decreased in both treatment groups from 13 (4-39) to 4 (0-25) and 14 (4-40) to 3 (0-29), respectively. At 12 weeks, the scores further decreased to 2 (0-13) and 2 (0-26), respectively. The vonoprazan 10 mg group showed a similar therapeutic effect to the 20 mg group in mucosal healing at 4 weeks and in symptom relief throughout the study period. When stratified by esophagitis grading, these findings were still demonstrated in grade A/B patients but not in grade C/D patients. CONCLUSION Our findings suggest that initial treatment with vonoprazan 10 mg might be useful especially in patients with mild erosive esophagitis. Large controlled studies are warranted to confirm our investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideharu Okanobu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan.
| | - Tomohiko Kohno
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Ritsuo Mouri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Yoshiki Hatsushika
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Yumiko Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Eisuke Miyaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Takayuki Fukuhara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Akihito Okazaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Ayaka Sakano
- Department of Medical Checkup Center, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Ayako Urabe
- Department of Medical Checkup Center, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Shintaro Takaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Nami Mori
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Keiji Tsuji
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Hidenori Ochi
- Department of Medical Checkup Center, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| | - Yoshinari Furukawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hiroshima Red Cross Hospital and Atomic-Bomb, Survivors Hospital, 1-9-6, Sendamachi, Naka-ku, Hiroshima, 730-8619, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hoshikawa Y, Kawami N, Hoshino S, Tanabe T, Umezawa M, Kaise M, Iwakiri K. Efficacy of on-demand therapy using 20-mg vonoprazan for non-erosive reflux disease. Esophagus 2019; 16:201-206. [PMID: 30600486 DOI: 10.1007/s10388-018-00654-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2018] [Accepted: 12/21/2018] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the efficacy of on-demand therapy using 20-mg vonoprazan for non-erosive reflux disease. METHODS On-demand therapy by taking one 20-mg tablet of vonoprazan only when reflux symptoms occurred was performed for 8 weeks by 30 patients (11 men, mean age: 67.8) with non-erosive reflux disease who responded well to maintenance therapy using proton pump inhibitor and answered "very satisfied" or "satisfied" to an overall satisfaction survey (5-grade scale). The degree of overall satisfaction with the treatment, score of symptoms, and fasting gastrin levels before breakfast was examined before and after on-demand therapy. The number of vonoprazan tablets taken and the frequency (regular, temporary, rare) of its administration were also investigated. RESULTS All patients completed 8-week on-demand therapy with 20-mg vonoprazan. Comparisons of patient satisfaction levels before and after therapy revealed no significant differences in the number of patients who were very satisfied and satisfied with the therapy. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in score of symptoms or gastrin levels before and after therapy. During 8-week on-demand therapy, patients took 11 tablets (median) (7.0-18.0 tablets: 25-75 percentiles), and 30.0% of patients (n = 9) took vonoprazan on a regular basis (at least 2 tablets a week). CONCLUSION On-demand therapy with 20-mg vonoprazan exerted equivalent effects to continuous PPI maintenance therapy for patients with non-erosive reflux disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yoshimasa Hoshikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Kawami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Shintaro Hoshino
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Tomohide Tanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Mariko Umezawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Mitsuru Kaise
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Iwakiri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Nippon Medical School, Graduate School of Medicine, 1-1-5, Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Cho JH, Koo JY, Kim KO, Lee SH, Jang BI, Kim TN. On-demand versus half-dose continuous therapy with esomeprazole for maintenance treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease: A randomized comparative study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2018; 97:e12732. [PMID: 30412065 PMCID: PMC6221682 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000012732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS No consensus has been established regarding optimal long-term maintenance therapy in symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study was to compare the efficacies of on-demand and continuous therapy with esomeprazole as maintenance treatments for GERD. METHODS Patients with upper gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy-proven GERD who received initial proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for 8 weeks were randomized to an on-demand group (esomeprazole 40 mg) or a continuous group (esomeprazole 20 mg). Intensities and frequencies of heartburn and acid regurgitation were assessed using a 6-point Likert scale (0 = no symptoms; 5 = very severe symptoms) and a 6-point frequency scale (0 = none; 5 = symptoms for > 5 days per week) at baseline (start of maintenance treatment) and after 12 weeks of treatment. Alleviation of symptoms was quantified using percentages of patients with a Likert scale or frequency scale of 0 or 1. RESULTS Of the 88 patients enrolled, 8 patients were excluded due to follow-up loss in early period of this study, and finally, 39 in the on-demand group and 41 in the continuous group were analyzed. No significant intergroup difference was found between Likert scale or frequency scale of heartburn or regurgitation at baseline. Percentages of symptom alleviations in the on-demand and continuous groups for intensity of heartburn were 56.4%/48.8% at baseline (P = .523) and 82.1%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .471), for frequency of heartburn were 61.5%/46.3% at baseline (P = .173) and 76.9%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .200), for intensity of regurgitation was 53.8%/43.9% at baseline (P = .374) and 82.1%/87.8% at 12 weeks (P = .471), and for frequency of regurgitation was 61.5%/56.1% at the baseline (P = .621) and 82.1%/82.9% at 12 weeks (P = .918), respectively. Furthermore, no significant intergroup difference was found for convenience of medication or subjective satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS Intensities and frequencies of heartburn and regurgitation responded well to maintenance treatment in patients in the on-demand and continuous groups. On-demand therapy with esomeprazole 40 mg appears to be sufficient for maintenance treatment in GERD patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joon Hyun Cho
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
On-Demand Therapy with Proton Pump Inhibitors for Maintenance Treatment of Nonerosive Reflux Disease or Mild Erosive Esophagitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2018; 2018:6417526. [PMID: 30158966 PMCID: PMC6109549 DOI: 10.1155/2018/6417526] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2018] [Revised: 06/30/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for the long-term management of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, concerns about the cost and/or inconvenience of continuous maintenance PPI treatment have led to the evaluation of various alternative approaches. Aim To assess the effectiveness of on-demand PPI therapy in the maintenance treatment of nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) or mild erosive esophagitis (EE). Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library from inception until October 2, 2017, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing on-demand PPI versus placebo or daily PPI in the management of NERD or mild EE (Savary-Miller grade 1). Discontinuation of therapy during the trial was used as a surrogate for patient dissatisfaction and failure of symptomatic control. We calculated pooled odds ratios (OR) to evaluate the efficacy of on-demand PPI treatment. Separate analyses were conducted for studies comparing on-demand PPI with daily PPI and with placebo. Subgroup analysis was done based on NERD studies alone and on studies of both NERD and mild EE. These were analyzed using a random effects model. Results We included 10 RCTs with 4574 patients. On-demand PPI was superior to daily PPI (pooled OR = 0.50; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.35, 0.72). On subgroup analysis in NERD patients only, pooled OR was 0.44 (0.29, 0.66). In studies including patients with NERD and mild EE, pooled OR was 0.76 (0.36, 1.60). For studies comparing on-demand PPI with placebo, pooled OR was 0.21 (0.15, 0.29); subgroup analyses of studies evaluating NERD only and studies conducted in NERD and mild EE showed similar results (pooled OR was 0.22 (0.13, 0.36) and 0.18 (0.11, 0.31), resp.). Conclusions On-demand PPI treatment is effective for many patients with NERD or mild EE. Although not FDA-approved, it may be adequate for those patients whose symptoms are controlled to their satisfaction.
Collapse
|
10
|
Kato M, Ito N, Demura M, Kubo K, Mabe K, Harada N. Study for every other day administration of vonoprazan in maintenance treatment of erosive GERD: study protocol for a multicentre randomised cross-over study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2018. [PMID: 29527318 PMCID: PMC5841500 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2017-000197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The first drug selected for treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and prevention of the recurrence is a proton pump inhibitor (PPI), but recently, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) was put on the market in Japan. Its onset of effect is faster than PPI, and it takes more than 2 days to recover acid secretion after the withdrawal period. Therefore, unlike PPI, the usefulness of every other day administration or discontinuous administration is expected. Methods and analysis This study is a prospective, multicentre, open-label, two-period randomised cross-over study to compare the efficacy and safety of PPI every other day administration and P-CAB every other day administration in 120 patients who receive erosive GERD maintenance therapy with PPI. Patients will be randomly allocated to receive 4 weeks P-CAB or PPI followed by 4 weeks cross over, where those on P-CAB will receive PPI and vice versa. The primary endpoint is proportion of asymptomatic patients. Secondary endpoints are suppressive effect of GERD symptoms, proportion of asymptomatic patients at each time point, safety and cost-saving effect of P-CAB every other day administration, compliance with every other day administration, and proportion of asymptomatic patients at the first month of study drug administration. Ethics and dissemination This study was approved by the National Hospital Organization Central Review Board for Clinical Trials (5 December 2017). Discussion If P-CAB every other day administration is established as one of GERD maintenance therapies, there is merit in both medical cost reduction and the safety to alleviate elevation in serum gastrin. Trial registration number UMIN000034701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mototsugu Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, Hakodate, Japan.,Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Noriko Ito
- Clinical Research Center, National Hospital Organization Nagoya Medical Center, Nagoya, Japan
| | - Mamiko Demura
- Department of Clinical Research, Hakodate National Hospital, Hakodate, Japan
| | - Kimitoshi Kubo
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, Hakodate, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Mabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Hakodate National Hospital, Hakodate, Japan
| | - Naohiko Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Kyushu Medical Center, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Are the Symptoms of an NSAID-Induced Ulcer Truly Milder Than Those of an Ordinary Ulcer? Gastroenterol Res Pract 2017; 2017:4653250. [PMID: 29129973 PMCID: PMC5654275 DOI: 10.1155/2017/4653250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 07/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The percentage of patients with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and low-dose aspirin- (LDA-) induced ulcers who complain of gastrointestinal symptoms has generally been considered to be low. The aim of this study was to examine and compare the symptoms and quality of life (QOL) at peptic ulcer onset. Methods This study involved 200 patients who were confirmed by endoscopy to be in the acute stage of gastroduodenal ulcer (A1-H1). Patients completed a self-administered questionnaire (Global Overall Symptom score and SF-8) at ulcer onset, and data were compared between NSAIDs/LDA ulcers and non-NSAIDs/LDA ulcers. Results The upper gastrointestinal symptoms score was significantly lower for patients using LDA only (20.5 ± 9.4 in the nonusing group, 19.6 ± 8.6 in the NSAIDs-only group, 16.7 ± 11.6 in the LDA-only group, and 18.5 ± 7.2 in the NSAIDs/LDA group, P < 0.05). The QOL score (physical summary) was significantly lower in the NSAID group (42.1 ± 9.9) than in the nonusing group (47.6 ± 7.6) (P < 0.05). Patients' characteristics showed no significant differences among the groups, with the exception of age. Conclusion The severity of upper abdominal symptoms at peptic ulcer onset was similar between NSAID users and nonusers.
Collapse
|
12
|
Hosseini M, Salari R, Shariatmaghani S, Birjandi B, Salari M. Gastrointestinal symptoms associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease, and their relapses after treatment with proton pump inhibitors: A systematic review. Electron Physician 2017; 9:4597-4605. [PMID: 28848636 PMCID: PMC5557141 DOI: 10.19082/4597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2016] [Accepted: 01/25/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a common functional gastrointestinal disorder with significant effects on the quality of life. The burden of GERD is soaring in Asia. Preventing symptom relapse is a therapeutic goal in GERD patients. Since proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are the first-line treatment of GERD, drug failure has become a major problem in the treatment procedure. We reviewed the literature in order to find articles related to comorbidities and symptoms affecting GERD from 1980 to 2015 via PubMed and Google Scholar using keywords such as ‘Gastroesophageal reflux disease’, ‘Gastrointestinal symptoms’ and Boolean operators (such as AND, OR, NOT). Due to the cost of PPI therapy and the high rate of GERD relapse after PPI therapy, demand for continuing this type of treatment is decreasing. Thus, we need to discover new approaches to treat the disease and also investigate the relationship between the treatment of GERD and its comorbidities and symptoms such as functional constipation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mousalreza Hosseini
- M.D., Gastroenterologist, Assistant Professor, Ghaem Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Roshanak Salari
- Ph.D. of Drug Control, Assistant Professor, Department of Traditional Persian Pharmacy, School of Persian and Complementary Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Somayeh Shariatmaghani
- M.D., Internist, Assistant Professor, Ghaem Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Batul Birjandi
- M.D., Internist, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| | - Masoumeh Salari
- M.D., Internist, Assistant Professor, Ghaem Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Boghossian TA, Rashid FJ, Thompson W, Welch V, Moayyedi P, Rojas‐Fernandez C, Pottie K, Farrell B. Deprescribing versus continuation of chronic proton pump inhibitor use in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 3:CD011969. [PMID: 28301676 PMCID: PMC6464703 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd011969.pub2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 69] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are a class of medications that reduce acid secretion and are used for treating many conditions such as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), dyspepsia, reflux esophagitis, peptic ulcer disease, and hypersecretory conditions (e.g. Zollinger-Ellison syndrome), and as part of the eradication therapy for Helicobacter pylori bacteria. However, approximately 25% to 70% of people are prescribed a PPI inappropriately. Chronic PPI use without reassessment contributes to polypharmacy and puts people at risk of experiencing drug interactions and adverse events (e.g. Clostridium difficile infection, pneumonia, hypomagnesaemia, and fractures). OBJECTIVES To determine the effects (benefits and harms) associated with deprescribing long-term PPI therapy in adults, compared to chronic daily use (28 days or greater). SEARCH METHODS We searched the following databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2016, Issue 10), MEDLINE, Embase, clinicaltrials.gov, and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP). The last date of search was November 2016. We handsearched the reference lists of relevant studies. We screened 2357 articles (2317 identified through search strategy, 40 through other resources). Of these articles, we assessed 89 for eligibility. SELECTION CRITERIA We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-randomized trials comparing at least one deprescribing modality (e.g. stopping PPI or reducing PPI) with a control consisting of no change in continuous daily PPI use in adult chronic users. Outcomes of interest were: change in gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, drug burden/PPI use, cost/resource use, negative and positive drug withdrawal events, and participant satisfaction. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Two review authors independently reviewed and extracted data and completed the risk of bias assessment. A third review author independently confirmed risk of bias assessment. We used Review Manager 5 software for data analysis. We contacted study authors if there was missing information. MAIN RESULTS The review included six trials (n = 1758). Trial participants were aged 48 to 57 years, except for one trial that had a mean age of 73 years. All participants were from the outpatient setting and had either nonerosive reflux disease or milder grades of esophagitis (LA grade A or B). Five trials investigated on-demand deprescribing and one trial examined abrupt discontinuation. There was low quality evidence that on-demand use of PPI may increase risk of 'lack of symptom control' compared with continuous PPI use (risk ratio (RR) 1.71, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.31 to 2.21), thereby favoring continuous PPI use (five trials, n = 1653). There was a clinically significant reduction in 'drug burden', measured as PPI pill use per week with on-demand therapy (mean difference (MD) -3.79, 95% CI -4.73 to -2.84), favoring deprescribing based on moderate quality evidence (four trials, n = 1152). There was also low quality evidence that on-demand PPI use may be associated with reduced participant satisfaction compared with continuous PPI use. None of the included studies reported cost/resource use or positive drug withdrawal effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS In people with mild GERD, on-demand deprescribing may lead to an increase in GI symptoms (e.g. dyspepsia, regurgitation) and probably a reduction in pill burden. There was a decline in participant satisfaction, although heterogeneity was high. There were insufficient data to make a conclusion regarding long-term benefits and harms of PPI discontinuation, although two trials (one on-demand trial and one abrupt discontinuation trial) reported endoscopic findings in their intervention groups at study end.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taline A Boghossian
- The Ottawa HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy501 Smyth RoadOttawaONCanadaK1H 8L6
| | - Farah Joy Rashid
- The Ottawa HospitalDepartment of Pharmacy501 Smyth RoadOttawaONCanadaK1H 8L6
| | - Wade Thompson
- University of OttawaBruyère Research Institute43 rue Bruyere StRoom 730DOttawaONCanadaK1N 5C8
| | - Vivian Welch
- University of OttawaBruyère Research Institute43 rue Bruyere StRoom 730DOttawaONCanadaK1N 5C8
| | - Paul Moayyedi
- McMaster UniversityDepartment of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology1200 Main Street WestRoom 4W8EHamiltonONCanadaL8N 3Z5
| | - Carlos Rojas‐Fernandez
- University of WaterlooSchool of Pharmacy10 Victoria St S.Room 7004KitchenerONCanadaN2G 1C5
| | - Kevin Pottie
- University of OttawaBruyère Research Institute43 rue Bruyere StRoom 730DOttawaONCanadaK1N 5C8
- University of OttawaFamily Medicine75 Bruyere StOttawaONCanadaK1N 5C8
| | - Barbara Farrell
- University of OttawaBruyère Research Institute43 rue Bruyere StRoom 730DOttawaONCanadaK1N 5C8
- University of WaterlooSchool of Pharmacy10 Victoria St S.Room 7004KitchenerONCanadaN2G 1C5
- University of OttawaFamily Medicine75 Bruyere StOttawaONCanadaK1N 5C8
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Saqui-Salces M, Tsao AC, Gillilland MG, Merchant JL. Weight gain in mice on a high caloric diet and chronically treated with omeprazole depends on sex and genetic background. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2017; 312:G15-G23. [PMID: 27810953 PMCID: PMC5283905 DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.00211.2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The impact of omeprazole (OM), a widely used over-the-counter proton pump inhibitor, on weight gain has not been extensively explored. We examined what factors, e.g., diet composition, microbiota, genetic strain, and sex, might affect weight gain in mice fed a high caloric diet while on OM. Inbred C57BL/6J strain, a 50:50 hybrid (B6SJLF1/J) strain, and mice on a highly mixed genetic background were fed four diets: standard chow (STD, 6% fat), STD with 200 ppm OM (STD + O), a high-energy chow (HiE, 11% fat), and HiE chow with OM (HiE + O) for 17 wk. Metabolic analysis, body composition, and fecal microbiota composition were analyzed in C57BL/6J mice. Oral glucose tolerance tests were performed using mice on the mixed background. After 8 wk, female and male C57BL/6J mice on the HiE diets ate less, whereas males on the HiE diets compared with the STD diets gained weight. All diet treatments reduced energy expenditure in females but in males only those on the HiE + O diet. Gut microbiota composition differed in the C57BL/6J females but not the males. Hybrid B6SJLF1/J mice showed similar weight gain on all test diets. In contrast, mixed strain male mice fed a HiE + O diet gained ∼40% more weight than females on the same diet. In addition to increased weight gain, mixed genetic mice on the HiE + O diet cleared glucose normally but secreted more insulin. We concluded that sex and genetic background define weight gain and metabolic responses of mice on high caloric diets and OM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amy C Tsao
- Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
| | | | - Juanita L Merchant
- Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and
- Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mizuki A, Tatemichi M, Sakakibara T, Miura Y, Zeki S, Ohata M, Matsuo K, Kawamura F, Nagata H. A Multicenter, Randomized, Open-Label Trial: Efficacy of Once-Daily Versus Twice-Daily Double-Dose Rabeprazole on Refractory Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease-Related Symptoms and Quality of Life. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 2016; 79:1-7. [PMID: 28066515 PMCID: PMC5200872 DOI: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2016.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/14/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 20% to 40% of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) are refractory to standard-dose proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) treatment. Objective We compared the efficacy and quality-of-life effects of 20 mg once daily (QD) versus 10 mg twice daily (BID) rabeprazole (RPZ) in patients with refractory GERD-related symptoms and sleep disturbances. Methods This multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label study included patients in whom PPI treatment >4 weeks was ineffective. According to the Global Overall Symptom (GOS) scale, PPI-refractory GERD was defined as ≥1 category with >3 points among 10 specific upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Seventy-eight patients were randomly assigned to 20 mg QD and 10 mg BID RPZ groups for 8 weeks. Efficacy was evaluated using self-reported questionnaires, including the GOS scale and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), whereas quality of life was assessed using the Short-Form 8 Health Survey (SF-8), at 4 and 8 weeks. Patients showing improvement at 8 weeks received follow-up every 4 to 8 weeks. Results GOS scale scores were significantly improved at 8 weeks in both groups, with no significant intergroup differences. Although SF-8 scores showed an increasing trend over 8 weeks in both groups, the physical component summaries in the 10 mg BID group significantly improved. The mental component summaries clearly improved in the 10 mg BID group. Of the 74 cases (4 missing), 51 (68.9%) had PSQI scores ≥5.5. PSQI scores remained unchanged during follow-up in both groups. The recurrence rate was not significantly different (46.1% vs 47.1% in the 20 mg QD and 10 mg BID groups, respectively) during the follow-up period at median (interquartile range) 24.0 (30.5) months. Conclusions In patients with refractory GERD, there was no significant difference in GOS scale score, PSQI, or recurrence rate between the groups. With regard to subscores of the SF-8, the 10 mg BID group might be potentially effective. This multicenter prospective randomized comparative study compares the efficacy on symptoms, QOL and sleep disturbance between two ways of double dose PPI; once-daily 20mg RPZ or twice-daily 10mg RPZ. The patients with PPI refractory GERD were suffered from severe acid reflux symptoms, sleep disturbance and general distress. For these reasons, to establish the treatments to refractory GERD was important to improve their QOL. In patients with refractory GERD, there was no significant difference in GOS, PSQI, or recurrence rate between the groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Akira Mizuki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Keiyu Hospital, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Masayuki Tatemichi
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Hiroshi Nagata
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Prospective, Randomized Ex Vivo Trial to Assess the Ideal Stapling Site for Endoscopic Fundoplication with Medigus Ultrasonic Surgical Endostapler. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2016; 2016:3161738. [PMID: 27547219 PMCID: PMC4983363 DOI: 10.1155/2016/3161738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/13/2016] [Accepted: 07/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Aims. Endoscopic fundoplication is an emerging technique for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study is to determine the ideal position of the staples in relation to gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Methods. Ten endoscopic fundoplication procedures were performed in each group using fresh ex vivo porcine stomachs: Group A: 2 staples each at 3 cm above the GEJ and 180° apart; Group B: 2 staples at 3 cm and 90° apart; Group C: 2 staples at 4 cm and 180° apart; Group D: 3 staples at 3 cm with 90° between each staple (180° total). After the procedure, the stomach was gradually filled with water. Gastric yield pressure (GYP) was determined by detection of reflux of the water in esophagus or by rupture of staples. Results. Mean increase of GYPs (±SD) after the procedure was as follows: Group A: 16.9 ± 8.7; Group B: 8.1 ± 7.9; Group C: 12.2 ± 9.4; Group D: 22.7 ± 13.3. GYP in Group A and Group D was higher than Group B (p = 0.03 and p = 0.01, resp.). Conclusions. We recommend the placement of 3 staples at 3 cm distance from the GEJ, which resulted in the highest increase of GYP.
Collapse
|
17
|
Bayerdörffer E, Bigard MA, Weiss W, Mearin F, Rodrigo L, Dominguez Muñoz JE, Grundling H, Persson T, Svedberg LE, Keeling N, Eklund S. Randomized, multicenter study: on-demand versus continuous maintenance treatment with esomeprazole in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16:48. [PMID: 27080034 PMCID: PMC4831110 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0448-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Most patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease experience symptomatic relapse after stopping acid-suppressive medication. The aim of this study was to compare willingness to continue treatment with esomeprazole on-demand versus continuous maintenance therapy for symptom control in patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) after 6 months. Methods This multicenter, open-label, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled adults with NERD who were heartburn-free after 4 weeks’ treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg daily. Patients received esomeprazole 20 mg daily continuously or on-demand for 6 months. The primary variable was discontinuation due to unsatisfactory treatment. On-demand treatment was considered non-inferior if the upper limit of the one-sided 95 % confidence interval (CI) for the difference between treatments was <10 %. Results Of 877 patients enrolled, 598 were randomized to maintenance treatment (continuous: n = 297; on-demand: n = 301). Discontinuation due to unsatisfactory treatment was 6.3 % for on-demand and 9.8 % for continuous treatment (difference −3.5 % [90 % CI: −7.1 %, 0.2 %]). In total, 82.1 and 86.2 % of patients taking on-demand and continuous therapy, respectively, were satisfied with the treatment of heartburn and regurgitation symptoms, a secondary variable (P = NS). Mean study drug consumption was 0.41 and 0.91 tablets/day, respectively. Overall, 5 % of the on-demand group developed reflux esophagitis versus none in the continuous group (P < 0.0001). The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale Reflux dimension was also improved for continuous versus on-demand treatment. Esomeprazole was well tolerated. Conclusions In terms of willingness to continue treatment, on-demand treatment with esomeprazole 20 mg was non-inferior to continuous maintenance treatment and reduced medication usage in patients with NERD who had achieved symptom control with initial esomeprazole treatment. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier (NCT number): NCT02670642; Date of registration: December 2015.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marc-Andre Bigard
- Gastroenterology Unit, University Hospital, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | - Werner Weiss
- 4th Medical Department, Hospital Rudolfstiftung, Vienna, Austria
| | - Fermín Mearin
- Gastroenterology Service, Centro Médico Teknon, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Luis Rodrigo
- Gastroenterology Service, Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain
| | | | - Hennie Grundling
- Department of Internal Medicine, Universitas Hospital, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Takeshima F, Hashiguchi K, Onitsuka Y, Tanigawa K, Minami H, Matsushima K, Akazawa Y, Shiozawa K, Yamaguchi N, Taura N, Ohnita K, Ichikawa T, Isomoto H, Nakao K. Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Refractory to Proton Pump Inhibitors and the Effects of Switching to 20 mg Esomeprazole on Reflux Symptoms and Quality of Life. Med Sci Monit 2015; 21:4111-21. [PMID: 26719012 PMCID: PMC4700865 DOI: 10.12659/msm.895346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) may deteriorate patient quality of life (QOL) despite proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Nineteen Japanese institutions were surveyed to determine the clinical characteristics and QOL of patients with refractory GERD. Those patients treated with a conventional PPI were switched to 20 mg esomeprazole for 4 weeks. Symptoms and QOL were assessed using Global Overall Symptom and Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) questionnaires at baseline and at 2 and/or 4 weeks of esomeprazole treatment. RESULTS Of 120 patients who completed the survey, 58 (48.3%) had refractory GERD. Of these, 69.0% were aged ≥ 65 years, 79.3% were prescribed a PPI at a standard or high dose, and 22.4% were prescribed a PPI together with another drug. After switching to esomeprazole, patients reported significant improvements in heartburn, acid regurgitation, and excessive belching at 2 weeks using a symptom diary, as well as the total score, reflux, abdominal pain, and indigestion, which were assessed using the GSRS at 4 weeks. CONCLUSIONS About half of Japanese patients with GERD may be refractory to conventional PPIs. Their reflux-related symptoms are often severe and may impair QOL. Switching to esomeprazole could be used to improve their symptoms and QOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fuminao Takeshima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Keiichi Hashiguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yasunori Onitsuka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Onitsuka Clinic of Internal Medicine, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Ken Tanigawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tanigawa Clinic of Radiology and Gastroenterology, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | - Kayoko Matsushima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Yuko Akazawa
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | - Naoyuki Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Naota Taura
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Ken Ohnita
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | | | - Hajime Isomoto
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Kazuhiko Nakao
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nagasaki University Hospital, Nagasaki, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Nagahara A, Asaoka D, Hojo M, Sasaki H, Shimada Y, Matsumoto K, Ueyama H, Shibuya T, Sakamoto N, Osada T, Watanabe S. Difference in efficacy of proton pump inhibitor between new-onset and recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease: Result from a study of on-demand versus continuous maintenance therapy in Japan. Hippokratia 2015; 19:53-56. [PMID: 26435648 PMCID: PMC4574588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND-OBJECTIVE No study has focused on the difference in efficacy of maintenance therapy between patients with new-onset and recurrent gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). The aim of this study is to reveal this point. METHODS Endoscopically proven GERD patients who had completed 8-week initial therapy were sequentially randomized to continuous arm (Omeprazole 20mg od) or on-demand arm (Omeprazole 20mg on-demand). Patients filled in daily symptoms and tablet usages for 24 weeks. Patients underwent upper GI endoscopy at 24 weeks. Symptom relief was defined as no symptoms for>6 days during a week. The numbers of patients who achieved symptom relief and mucosal healing were compared between the new-onset and recurrent groups in the continuous arm and in the on-demand arm, respectively. RESULTS Among new-onset GERD [n=82 (continuous: 42 patients, on-demand: 40)], continuous arm achieved significant symptom-relief than in on-demand arm at 4*,5*,6** and 17*week. Among recurrent GERD [n=36(continuous: 17 patients, on-demand: 19)], continuous arm achieved significant symptom-relief at 1**,2*,3*,4*,5**,7**,8**,17* and 18* week, respectively (*<0.05,**<0.01). The number of healed patients was significantly higher in new-onset group (60/68, 88.2%) than in recurrent group (17/30, 56.7%) (<0.01). CONCLUSION Since therapeutic response during maintenance therapy was poor in recurrent GERD, continuous therapy is recommended in order to maintain symptom-relief and mucosal healing. Hippokratia 2015, 19 (1): 53-56.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Nagahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - D Asaoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - M Hojo
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Sasaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Y Shimada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - K Matsumoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - H Ueyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Shibuya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - N Sakamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - T Osada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - S Watanabe
- Department of Gastroenterology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Song W, Zhang X, Li S, Xu W. Design, synthesis, and preliminary activity evaluation of novel pyrimidine derivatives as acid pump antagonists. Chem Biol Drug Des 2014; 85:306-14. [PMID: 24995399 DOI: 10.1111/cbdd.12390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2014] [Revised: 05/31/2014] [Accepted: 06/26/2014] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Acid-related diseases of the upper gastrointestinal tract, especially gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), remain a widespread problem worldwide. In this paper, we reported the design, synthesis, and preliminary gastric antisecretory activity evaluation of novel pyrimidine derivatives as acid pump antagonists. The gastric antisecretory activity assay results showed that all compounds displayed potent gastric antisecretory activity when gastric secretion was stimulated by histamine. The most potent compound 5g exhibited even similar gastric antisecretory activity compared with the control revaprazan, and the relative inhibition rate was 93.0%, which was worthy of further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weiguo Song
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, Shandong University, 44 West Culture Road, Ji'nan, Shandong, 250012, China; Shouguang Fukang Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., 5 xueyuan east street, Shouguang, Shandong, 262799, China
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|