Efficacy of endoscopic mucosal resections for the management of small gastric adenomas with low-grade dysplasia

Comparison of endoscopic treatments for small gastric adenomas

BACKGROUND

Gastric adenomas can be successfully treated with endoscopic resection, including endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR). The aim of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of ESD and EMR with circumferential precutting (EMR-P) in the treatment of small gastric adenomas.

METHODS

This study included 1014 gastric adenomas ≤ 15 mm in diameter treated with ESD or EMR-P from 2012 to 2019, retrospectively. Propensity score matching between the ESD and EMR-P groups (1:1 to 3:1) was performed according to age, sex, tumor size, tumor location (upper, middle, and lower thirds), morphology, and preprocedural histology. The procedure time and the rates of en bloc resection, complete resection, adverse events, and local recurrence were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 478 lesions (ESD: 295, EMR-P: 183) were analyzed. The rates of en bloc resection (94.9% vs. 93.4%, p = 0.498), complete resection (93.6% vs. 90.2%, p = 0.177), bleeding (8.1% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.063), and local recurrence (0.0% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.185) did not significantly differ between the two groups. The procedure time was significantly longer for ESD than for EMR-P (p < 0.001). In the EMR-P group, the complete resection rate was significantly lower in the upper third than in the middle and lower thirds (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EMR-P is as effective as ESD for the treatment of small gastric adenomas. However, the efficacy of EMR-P is lower for gastric adenomas in the proximal stomach.

Comparison of the procedure time differences between hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection in patients with early gastric neoplasms: a study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (Hybrid-G trial)

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is widely accepted as a local treatment for gastrointestinal tract tumors. As a simplified endoscopic procedure, hybrid ESD (H-ESD) has been performed for colorectal neoplasms in recent times. However, whether H-ESD is superior to conventional ESD (C-ESD) for patients with early gastric neoplasms (EGN) remains unclear. In this trial, we will compare the treatment outcomes of H-ESD and C-ESD. We hypothesize that the procedure time for H-ESD is shorter than that for C-ESD.

Methods

This is an investigator-initiated, multi-center, prospective, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial to be conducted beginning in August 2020 at nine institutions in Japan. We will determine if H-ESD is superior to C-ESD in terms of procedure time in patients with EGN diagnosed as macroscopically intramucosal (T1a) differentiated carcinoma ≤ 20 mm in diameter without ulcerative findings according to current Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines. A total of 82 patients will be recruited and randomly assigned to either the C-ESD or the H-ESD group. The primary outcome is ESD procedure time. Secondary outcomes include mucosal incision, time and speed of submucosal dissection, en bloc resection, complete resection, curability, adverse events related to the ESD procedure, extent of dissection before snaring, volume of injection solution, number and time of hemostasis, thickness of the submucosal layer in the resected specimen, and handover to another operator. The stated sample size was determined based on the primary outcome. According to a previous report comparing the procedure times of C-ESD and H-ESD, we hypothesized that H-ESD would provide a 0.2 reduction in logarithmically concerted procedure time (−37%). We estimated that a total of 82 participants were needed to reach a power of 80% for a t-test with a significance level of 0.05 and considering a 10% dropout.

Discussion

This trial will provide high-quality data on the benefits and risks of H-ESD for EGN patients. The results of this study could lead to improved outcomes in patients with EGN undergoing ESD. The results will be presented at national and international meetings and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Trial registration

UMIN-CTR UMIN000041244. Registered on July 29, 2020.

Reduction in the procedure time of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric neoplasms: a multi-center retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric neoplasms is still a technically difficult and time-consuming procedure. Hybrid ESD (H-ESD) involves circumferential incision with partial submucosal dissection combined with subsequent mucosal resection by snaring, wherein the newly developed device allows us to perform H-ESD using a single device. This study aimed to determine the clinical outcomes of H-ESD compared with conventional ESD (C-ESD) for early gastric neoplasms.

METHODS

In this multi-center, retrospective study, using propensity score-matched analysis, we reviewed the charts of patients with early gastric neoplasms smaller than 20 mm treated with H-ESD or C-ESD at three hospitals between January 2017 and October 2018. The primary outcome was the procedure time, and the secondary outcomes were other factors, including the en bloc resection rate, complete resection rate, curative resection rate, and rate of adverse events.

RESULTS

Among 215 patients, 29 underwent H-ESD and 186 underwent C-ESD; 29 pairs were created by propensity score matching. In the H-ESD group, 82.8% of lesions met the absolute indication [mucosal lesions limited to 20-mm diameter, dominated by differentiated adenocarcinoma without ulcer (scar)] for endoscopic resection (ER). As a result, the procedure time of H-ESD was significantly shorter than that of C-ESD [20 (interquartile range, 12-27) min versus 40 (30-50) min; p < 0.001]. There was no significant difference in the secondary outcomes between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

H-ESD contributed to reduced procedure time. Therefore, H-ESD could be an alternative endoscopic treatment for gastric neoplasms when the lesion fulfils the absolute indication for ER.

Predictive Model of Nonneoplastic Pathology after Endoscopic Resection of Gastric Epithelial Neoplasia

Background/Aims

The rate of nonneoplastic pathology (NNP) after endoscopic resection (ER) of gastric epithelial neoplasia (GEN) has been reported to be 3%–7%. However, to date, the associations of pretreatment characteristics with NNP have not been identified. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive model for NNP after ER.

Methods

Among 817 patients who underwent ER for GEN, factors associated with NNP were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. Weighted points considering the β coefficient were allocated to each variable that was significant in the multivariate analysis. The predictive score was calculated by the total points. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated for the predictive score.

Results

The rate of NNP was 8.8%. After multivariate analysis, poor demarcation from the background, no ulceration, a flat appearance, and low-grade dysplasia were significant factors predictive of NNP. One point each was allocated for no ulcer, flat appearance, and low-grade dysplasia. Two points were allocated for poor demarcation from the background. The predictive score ranged from 0 to 5 points. Patients were categorized as being at low risk (0, 1, or 2 points) or high risk (3, 4, or 5 points) for NNP. The AUROC was 0.82 (95% confidence interval, 0.77 to 0.88; p<0.01). With a cutoff value of 2.5, the sensitivity and specificity of the score for predicting NNP were 0.72 and 0.84, respectively.

Conclusions

We developed a model to predict NNP after ER. Endoscopic re-biopsy or re-evaluation by pathologists is strongly recommended for the high-risk group.

[Endoscopic Treatment of Gastric Adenoma]

Gastric adenoma (dysplasia) is a precancerous lesion. Therefore, managements of gastric adenomas are important for preventing the development of gastric cancers and for detecting gastric cancers at earlier stages. The Vienna classification divides gastric adenomas into two categories: high-grade dysplasia and low-grade dysplasia. Generally, endoscopic resection is performed for adenoma with high-grade dysplasia due to the coexistence of carcinoma and the potential of progression to carcinomas. However, the treatments of adenoma with low-grade dysplasia remain controversial. Currently two treatment strategies for the low-grade type have been suggested; First is the 'wait and see' strategy; Second is endoscopic treatment (e.g., endoscopic mucosal resection, endoscopic submucosal dissection, or argon plasma coagulation). In this review, we discuss the current optimal strategies for endoscopic management of gastric adenoma.

Risk Factors for Additional Surgery after Iatrogenic Perforations due to Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection

Objectives. Endoscopic resection (ER) is commonly performed to treat gastric epithelial neoplasms and subepithelial tumors. The aim of this study was to predict the risk factors for surgery after ER-induced perforation. Methods. We retrospectively reviewed the data on patients who received gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) between January 2010 and March 2015. Patients who were confirmed to have perforation were classified into surgery and nonsurgery groups. We aimed to determine the risk factors for surgery in patients who developed iatrogenic gastric perforations. Results. A total of 1183 patients underwent ER. Perforation occurred in 69 (5.8%) patients, and 9 patients (0.8%) required surgery to manage the perforation. In univariate analysis, anterior location of the lesion, a subepithelial lesion, two or more postprocedure pain killers within 24 hrs, and increased heart rate within 24 hrs after the procedure were the factors related to surgery. In logistic regression analysis, the location of the lesion at the anterior wall and using two or more postprocedure pain killers within 24 hrs were risk factors for surgery. Conclusion. Most cases of perforations after ER can be managed conservatively. When a patient requires two or more postprocedure pain killers within 24 hrs and the lesion is located on the anterior wall, early surgery should be considered instead of conservative management.

Endoscopic management of mucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract

With the increasing role of endoscopy in patient evaluation, more mucosal lesions, including gastric, duodenal and colonic polyps, are encountered during routine examinations. It is imperative for gastroenterologists to become familiar with the endoscopic management of these various gastrointestinal lesions. In this article, various resection techniques will be discussed, including hot/cold forceps polypectomy, hot/cold snare polypectomy, endoscopic mucosal resection, and endoscopic submucosal dissection. The article will also discuss the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of these techniques and the future direction of endoscopic management of mucosal lesions in the gastrointestinal tract.