The relationship between cerebrovascular complications and previously established use of antiplatelet therapy in left-sided infective endocarditis

Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients With Infective Endocarditis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Antithrombotic therapy (ATT) in patients with infective endocarditis (IE) is challenging.

Objectives

The authors evaluated the impact of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy on clinical endpoints in IE patients.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing IE patients with prior and/or ongoing use of ATT vs those without any ATT during IE course. Primary outcome was reported in-hospital cerebrovascular events. Secondary outcomes were in-hospital mortality, intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), systemic thromboembolism (ST), and mortality within 6 months.

Results

Twelve studies, with a total of 12,151 patients, were included. The primary endpoint was not different comparing 10,115 IE patients with or without prior anticoagulation (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.56-2.17; P = 0.77) or comparing 838 IE patients with or without prior antiplatelet (OR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.61-1.33; P = 0.61). In-hospital mortality was lower in IE patients with prior anticoagulation compared to those without (OR: 0.74; 95% CI: 0.57-0.96; P = 0.03). There was no difference in reported ICH rates between patients with or without prior anticoagulation (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.27-1.09; P = 0.09) or between patients with or without prior antiplatelet (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.11-1.10; P = 0.07). The rate of ST was lower in IE patients with prior antiplatelet therapy compared to those without (OR: 0.53; 95% CI: 0.38-0.72; P < 0.01).

Conclusions

ATT in IE patients was not associated with higher frequency of cerebrovascular events or ICH. Moreover, we found that the use of anticoagulation was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality and the use of antiplatelets was associated with decreased ST. Due to the limitations of this study, these results should be interpreted cautiously showing the necessity of a randomized setup.

The Role of Platelets in Infective Endocarditis

Over the last decade, the incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) has increased, with a change in the frequency of causative bacteria. Early evidence has substantially demonstrated the crucial role of bacterial interaction with human platelets, with no clear mechanistic characterization in the pathogenesis of IE. The pathogenesis of endocarditis is so complex and atypical that it is still unclear how and why certain bacterial species will induce the formation of vegetation. In this review, we will analyze the key role of platelets in the physiopathology of endocarditis and in the formation of vegetation, depending on the bacterial species. We provide a comprehensive outline of the involvement of platelets in the host immune response, investigate the latest developments in platelet therapy, and discuss prospective research avenues for solving the mechanistic enigma of bacteria-platelet interaction for preventive and curative medicine.

Aspirin or Ticagrelor in Staphylococcus aureus Infective Endocarditis: Where Do We Stand?

Infective endocarditis is a challenging disease with a high mortality and morbidity rate. Antibiotic prophylaxis is currently recommended in high-risk infective endocarditis patients. However, the use of antibiotics faces the challenge of a low efficacy and contributes further to the emerging infection rate by antibiotic-resistant strains, emphasizing the need for new therapeutic strategies. Platelets are essential in the initial phase of infective endocarditis, acting as first-line immune responders. During the first phase of disease, bacteria can interact with platelets and counteract platelet antimicrobial activities. Mechanistic in vitro and animal studies on the effect of aspirin on bacteria-platelet interactions and the prevention of vegetation development showed promising results. However, data from clinical studies on the outcome of infective endocarditis patients who were receiving medically indicated aspirin therapy remain controversial. Therefore, the benefit of antiplatelet agents in infective endocarditis prevention has been questioned. Besides aspirin, it has been discovered that the platelet P2Y12 receptor antagonist ticagrelor has antibacterial properties in addition to its potent antiplatelet activity. Furthermore, a recent study in mice and a case report remarkably indicated the ability of this drug to eradicate Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia. This review will focus on current knowledge on antibacterial activity of ticagrelor, compared to aspirin, pointing out main unanswered questions. The goal is to provide food for thought as to whether a prior ticagrelor therapy might be beneficial for the prevention of infective endocarditis.

Neurological complications in children with infective endocarditis: Incidence, risk factors, and outcome: A 10-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Despite improvement in medical management, infective endocarditis (IE) remains a serious disease that may affect children with and without preexisting cardiac conditions with significant morbidity and mortality. Neurological complications of IE represent the worst with guarded prognosis. The aim of this study is to describe the incidence, etiology, characteristics, risk factors, and outcome of children with neurological complications associated with IE.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2009 to 2019 where all pediatric patients who fulfilled the modified Duke criteria for IE were included. We divided the cases into 2 groups: IE with neurological complications and IE without neurological complications control group. We compared the two groups statistically and analyzed the results.

RESULTS

We identified 31 (17 male, 14 female) patients with IE. Neurological complications occurred in 7/31 (23%) patients, mainly in the form of a stroke. Gram-positive microbes were the main causative agents for IE (52%) followed by gram-negative (14%), then fungal organisms (3%). Univariate analysis identified the following risk factors for neurological complications: lower body weight, higher C- reactive protein (CRP) level, and left-sided valvular lesions with P values of (0.0003, 0.0001, and 0.04), respectively.Although mortality was higher in the neurological complications group, it was 43% in comparison to 21% in the control group and it did not reach statistical significance (P = .49). Large vegetation size (more than 10 mm) was seen in 57% of patients with neurological complications as compared to 16% in the control group (P = .052).

CONCLUSION

Neurological complications occurred in almost a quarter of children with IE. Possible risk factors include lower body weight, left-sided valvular lesion, and higher levels of inflammatory markers (CRP). Stroke was the most common neurological complication encountered with possible increased risk of mortality.

Learning From Controversy: Contemporary Surgical Management of Aortic Valve Endocarditis

Aortic valve replacement is the commonest cardiac surgical operation performed worldwide for infective endocarditis (IE). Long-term durability and avoidance of infection relapse are goals of the procedure. However, no detailed guidelines on prosthesis selection and surgical strategies guided by the comprehensive evaluation of the extension of the infection and its microbiological characteristics, clinical profile of the patient, and risk of infection recurrence are currently available. Conventional mechanical or stented xenografts are the preferred choice for localized aortic infection. However, in cases of complex IE with the involvement of the root or the aortomitral continuity, the use of homograft is suggested according to the surgeon and center experience. Homograft use should be counterbalanced against the risk of structural degeneration. Prosthetic bioroot or prosthetic valved conduit (mechanical and bioprosthetic) are also potentially suitable alternatives. Further development of preservation techniques enabling longer durability of allogenic substitutes is required. We evaluate the current evidence for the use of valve substitutes in aortic valve endocarditis and propose an evidence-based algorithm to guide the choice of therapy. We performed a systemic review to clarify the contemporary surgical management of aortic valve endocarditis.

Aspirin Effect on Staphylococcus aureus-Platelet Interactions During Infectious Endocarditis

Infectious endocarditis (IE) is a rare disease associated with high mortality and morbidity rate. The platelet-bacterial interaction presents the cornerstone of the development of endocardial vegetation. The epidemiology of IE has undergone profound changes between the last and the new decade, with Staphylococcus aureus becoming the main incriminated species. Despite improvements in antibiotic and surgical therapies, embolic disorders remain highly associated with IE that can be fatal. Antiplatelet drugs have been widely proposed to overcome embolic events associated with IE. This proposal has been supported by numerous in vitro, experimental, and clinical studies. However, other studies have yielded conflicting results. In this review, we focus on the effect of aspirin on the genesis of S. aureus endocarditic vegetation, as well as on the management of embolic and hemorrhagic events related to it, starting by its influence on the platelet-bacteria interaction.

Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis is a potentially lethal disease that has undergone major changes in both host and pathogen. The epidemiology of infective endocarditis has become more complex with today's myriad healthcare-associated factors that predispose to infection. Moreover, changes in pathogen prevalence, in particular a more common staphylococcal origin, have affected outcomes, which have not improved despite medical and surgical advances.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This statement updates the 2005 iteration, both of which were developed by the American Heart Association under the auspices of the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease of the Young. It includes an evidence-based system for diagnostic and treatment recommendations used by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association for treatment recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Infective endocarditis is a complex disease, and patients with this disease generally require management by a team of physicians and allied health providers with a variety of areas of expertise. The recommendations provided in this document are intended to assist in the management of this uncommon but potentially deadly infection. The clinical variability and complexity in infective endocarditis, however, dictate that these recommendations be used to support and not supplant decisions in individual patient management.