Effect of piperacillin/tazobactam therapy on intestinal microflora

The use of first-generation cephalosporin antibiotics, cefalexin and cefradine, is not associated with induction of simulated Clostridioides difficile infection

OBJECTIVES

The use of broad-spectrum cephalosporins is associated with induction of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). Recent knowledge on the importance of the healthy microbiota in preventing pathogen colonization/outgrowth highlights the caution needed when prescribing broad-spectrum antibiotics. The use of historical narrow-spectrum antibiotics, such as first-generation cephalosporins, is gaining increased attention once more as they have a reduced impact on the microbiota whilst treating infections. Here, the effects of two first-generation cephalosporins, compared with a third-generation cephalosporin, on the human microbiota were investigated and their propensity to induce simulated CDI.

METHODS

Three in vitro chemostat models, which simulate the physiochemical conditions of the human colon, were seeded with a human faecal slurry and instilled with either narrow-spectrum cephalosporins, cefalexin and cefradine, or a broad-spectrum cephalosporin, ceftriaxone, at concentrations reflective of colonic levels.

RESULTS

Instillation of cefalexin was associated with reduced recoveries of Bifidobacterium and Enterobacteriaceae; however, Clostridium spp. recoveries remained unaffected. Cefradine exposure was associated with decreased recoveries of Bifidobacterium spp., Bacteroides spp. and Enterobacteriaceae. These changes were not associated with induction of CDI, as we observed a lack of C. difficile spore germination/proliferation, thus no toxin was detected. This is in contrast to a model exposed to ceftriaxone, where CDI was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

These model data suggest that the minimal impact of first-generation cephalosporins, namely cefalexin and cefradine, on the intestinal microbiota results in a low propensity to induce CDI.

Development and validation of a liquid chromatography high-resolution mass spectrometry orbitrap method for the sensitive quantification of amoxicillin, piperacillin, tazobactam and meropenem in human faeces

Beta-lactam antibiotics are of vital importance for the treatment of infections in a broad range of patients. Although most systemically administered antibiotics will be excreted renally, a fraction will reach the gastro-intestinal tract, affecting the intestinal microbiome by eradicating a wide range of bacterial species while facilitating the growth of antimicrobial-resistant species. A better understanding of the kinetics of beta-lactam antibiotics in the gastro-intestinal tract is essential to study their role in the development of antibiotic resistance in bacteria and to help develop future therapies to prevent damage to, or restore, the intestinal microbiome. Analysis of beta-lactam antibiotics in faeces is particularly challenging due to the heterogeneous nature of the matrix, rapid degradation of some beta-lactam antibiotics in faeces and very strong ion suppression when using mass spectrometry. Sample preparation was optimized using a sequential strategy of experimental designs. It resulted in lyophilization, a MOPS buffer system and the addition of the beta-lactamase inhibitor avibactam to minimize degradation of antibiotics allowing sensitive quantification. The developed liquid chromatography method with high-resolution mass spectrometric detection was successfully validated according to bioanalytical EMA guidelines and had a linear range of 1-200 μg g^-1 lyophilized faeces for amoxicillin, piperacillin and meropenem; and 0.5-100 μg g^-1 lyophilized faeces for tazobactam. Despite the highly complex and heterogeneous composition of faeces, the accuracy (0.1-15%) and precision (1.7-12.1%) were in line with those obtained for quantification methods of beta-lactam antibiotics in plasma, the golden standard matrix for therapeutic drug monitoring. The applicability of the method was illustrated by successful quantification of piperacillin and tazobactam in faeces from an intensive care unit patient receiving piperacillin/tazobactam in a continuous intravenous infusion. Both piperacillin and tazobactam were still present six days after discontinuation of the therapy.

High Heterogeneity of Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Fecal Levels in Hospitalized Patients Is Partially Driven by Intravenous β-Lactams

Multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (MRE) colonize the intestine asymptomatically from where they can breach into the bloodstream and cause life-threatening infections, especially in heavily colonized patients. Despite the clinical relevance of MRE colonization levels, we know little about how they vary in hospitalized patients and the clinical factors that determine those levels. Here, we conducted one of the largest studies of MRE fecal levels by tracking longitudinally 133 acute leukemia patients and monitoring their MRE levels over time through extensive culturing. MRE were defined as Enterobacteriaceae species that acquired nonsusceptibility to ≥1 agent in ≥3 antimicrobial categories. In addition, due to the selective media used, the MRE had to be resistant to third-generation cephalosporins. MRE were detected in 60% of the patients, but their fecal levels varied considerably among patients and within the same patient (>6 and 4 orders of magnitude, respectively). Multivariate analysis of clinical metadata revealed an impact of intravenous beta-lactams (i.e., meropenem and piperacillin-tazobactam), which significantly diminished the fecal MRE levels in hospitalized patients. Consistent with a direct action of beta-lactams, we found an effect only when the patient was colonized with strains sensitive to the administered beta-lactam (P < 0.001) but not with nonsusceptible strains. We report previously unobserved inter- and intraindividual heterogeneity in MRE fecal levels, suggesting that quantitative surveillance is more informative than qualitative surveillance of hospitalized patients. In addition, our study highlights the relevance of incorporating antibiotic treatment and susceptibility data of gut-colonizing pathogens for future clinical studies and in clinical decision-making.

Increased Susceptibility to Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus Intestinal Colonization Persists After Completion of Anti-Anaerobic Antibiotic Treatment in Mice

Background:

Antibiotic-associated disruption of the indigenous intestinal microflora may persist beyond the treatment period. Although piperacillin/tazobactam inhibits the establishment of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) stool colonization in mice during treatment, we hypothesized that this agent and other anti-anaerobic antibiotics would increase susceptibility to colonization during the period of recovery of the intestinal microflora.

Design:

Mice received 104 colony-forming units of vancomycin-resistant E. faecium by orogastric inoculation 2, 5, or 10 days after completing 5 days of subcutaneous antibiotic treatment, or both during and 2 days after the completion of treatment. Denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) was performed to assess changes in the intestinal microflora.

Results:

Anti-anaerobic antibiotics (ie, piperacillin/tazobactam, cefoxitin, and clindamycin) caused significant disruption of the indigenous microflora (mean DGGE similarity indices ≤ 27% in comparison with saline controls) and promoted the establishment of high-density colonization when VRE was inoculated 2 or 5, but not 10, days following treatment (P < .001). Piperacillin/tazobactam exhibited a biphasic effect on the establishment of colonization (ie, inhibition when exposed to VRE during treatment and promotion when exposed to VRE after discontinuation of treatment), resulting in greater overall promotion of colonization than did agents with minimal anti-anaerobic activity (ie, levofloxacin, cefepime, and aztreonam) when VRE was inoculated both during and 2 days after treatment (P< .001).

Conclusion:

Patients receiving anti-anaerobic antibiotics, including piperacillin/tazobactam, may be susceptible to the establishment of high-density VRE colonization during the period of recovery of the anaerobic microflora.

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Enterococcus strains used in clinical practice as probiotics

The aim of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial susceptibilities of probiotic strains that are suggested to be effective for preventing antibiotics-associated diarrhea (AAD). The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 17 antibiotics against probiotic strains were tested by the agar plate dilution method or broth microdilution method. In all, eight probiotic strains containing Enterococcus faecalis, Bifidobacterium spp., Clostridium butyricum, and Lactobacillus acidophilus were tested. Although the MIC range was wide, from less than 0.0625 to more than 1,024 μg/ml, the MICs of 11 beta-lactams were high for three of four enterococci, with a range of 32 to more than 1,024 μg/ml. In contrast, fluoroquinolones and vancomycin showed potent activities against all enterococci, of which MICs were 0.25-8 μg/ml. Two Bifidobacterium strains and one Lactobacillus strain showed low MICs against many of the beta-lactams, fluoroquinolones, macrolides, and vancomycin, with MICs of 8 μg/ml or less. Fosfomycin showed generally mild activity against enterococci (MIC, 8-32 μg/ml) and anaerobic strains (MIC, 32 to >1,024 μg/ml), respectively. The probiotics strains with high MIC values may survive in the intestinal tract, even if the patient was concomitantly using the antibiotics in clinical practice. Therefore, our results suggest that adequate combinations of probiotics strains and antibiotics should be important for preventing AAD. Further study is needed to determine the efficacy of probiotics in clinical practice.

Effects of treatment with antimicrobial agents on the human colonic microflora

Antimicrobial agents are the most valuable means available for treating bacterial infections. However, the administration of therapeutic doses of antimicrobial agents to patients is a leading cause of disturbance of the normal gastrointestinal microflora. This disturbance results in diminishing the natural defense mechanisms provided by the colonic microbial ecosystem, making the host vulnerable to infection by commensal microorganisms or nosocomial pathogens. In this minireview, the impacts of antimicrobials, individually and in combinations, on the human colonic microflora are discussed.

Acquisition of rectal colonization by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus among intensive care unit patients treated with piperacillin-tazobactam versus those receiving cefepime-containing antibiotic regimens

In contrast to expanded-spectrum cephalosporins, beta-lactam-beta-lactamase inhibitor combinations such as piperacillin-tazobactam have rarely been associated with vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization and infection. In mice, piperacillin-tazobactam has sufficient antienterococcal activity to inhibit the establishment of colonization during treatment, but this effect has not been confirmed in human patients. We prospectively evaluated the acquisition of rectal colonization by VRE among intensive care unit patients receiving antibiotic regimens containing piperacillin-tazobactam versus those receiving cefepime, an expanded-spectrum cephalosporin with minimal antienterococcal activity. Rectal swabs were obtained weekly and were cultured for VRE. For 146 patients with a negative rectal swab for VRE prior to therapy, there was no significant difference in the frequency of VRE acquisition between patients receiving piperacillin-tazobactam- and cefepime-containing regimens (19/72 [26.4%] and 23/74 [31.1%], respectively; P = 0.28). Of the 19 patients who acquired VRE in association with piperacillin-tazobactam, 10 (53%) developed the new detection of VRE during therapy. Patients initiated on treatment with cefepime-containing regimens were significantly more likely than those initiated on treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam-containing regimens to have received antibiotic therapy in the prior 30 days (55/74 [74.3%] and 22/72 [30.6%], respectively; P < 0.001). These findings suggest that piperacillin-tazobactam- and cefepime-containing antibiotic regimens may be associated with the frequent acquisition of VRE in real-world intensive care unit settings. Although piperacillin-tazobactam inhibits the establishment of VRE colonization in mice when exposure occurs during treatment, our data suggest that this agent may not prevent the acquisition of VRE in patients.

Antianaerobic antibiotic therapy promotes overgrowth of antibiotic-resistant, gram-negative bacilli and vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Antianaerobic antibiotic therapy promotes persistent high-density growth of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in the stool of colonized patients. We tested the hypothesis that antibiotic regimens with potent antianaerobic activity promote overgrowth of coexisting antibiotic-resistant, gram-negative bacilli in the stool of VRE-colonized patients.

DESIGN

Eight-month prospective study examining the effect of antibiotic therapy on the stool density of gram-negative bacilli resistant to ceftazidime, ciprofloxacin, or piperacillin/tazobactam.

SETTING

A Department of Veterans Affairs medical center including an acute care hospital and nursing home.

PATIENTS

All VRE-colonized patients with at least 3 stool samples available for analysis.

RESULTS

One-hundred forty stool samples were obtained from 37 study patients. Forty-nine (61%) of 80 stool samples obtained during therapy with an antianaerobic regimen were positive for an antibiotic-resistant, gram-negative bacillus, where-as only 14 (23%) of 60 samples obtained 4 or more weeks after completion of such therapy were positive (P < .001). Twenty-four (65%) of the 37 patients had one or more stool cultures positive for a gram-negative bacillus resistant to ciprofloxacin, ceftazidime, or piperacillin/tazobactam. The density of these organisms was higher during therapy with antianaerobic regimens than in the absence of such therapy for at least 2 weeks (mean +/- standard deviation, 5.6 +/- 1.4 and 3.9 +/- 0.71 log10 organisms/g; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Limiting the use of antianaerobic antibiotics in VRE-colonized patients may reduce the density of colonization with coexisting antibiotic-resistant, gram-negative bacilli.

Risk factors for development of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal bloodstream infection in patients with cancer who are colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci

Vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) is a common nosocomial isolate, especially among patients with cancer. VRE infections have substantial attributable mortality among patients with cancer. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for developing bloodstream infection with VRE in patients with cancer who are colonized with VRE. VRE colonization was prospectively identified in 197 patients with cancer during 4-year period, of whom 179 (91%) had complete records for evaluation. Of these 179 patients, 24 (13.4%) developed hospital-acquired VRE bloodstream infections. Risk factors for VRE bloodstream infection included vancomycin use (relative risk [RR], 1.98; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.25-3.14), diabetes mellitus (RR, 3.91; 95% CI, 1.20-12.77), gastrointestinal procedures (RR, 4.56; 95% CI, 1.05-19.7), and acute renal failure (RR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.07-8.93). Strategies for preventing VRE bloodstream infection in VRE-colonized patients with cancer should include limiting vancomycin use and, perhaps, gastrointestinal procedures.

Impact of combinations of antineoplastic drugs on intestinal microflora in 9 patients with leukaemia

The impact of antineoplastic drugs on the intestinal microflora was studied in 9 patients with acute leukaemia during chemotherapy and in 5 patients also during chemotherapy-induced neutropenia. Quantitative and qualitative microbiological analyses of faecal samples obtained before and during chemotherapy showed significantly increased counts of Bacteroides spp. in 3/9 patients and, during neutropenia, significantly increased counts of yeasts in 2/5 patients; however, the intestinal microflora was stable in most patients.

Recurrence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus stool colonization during antibiotic therapy

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that antibiotic therapy may promote recurrence of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) stool colonization in patients who have previously had three consecutive negative stool cultures obtained at least 1 week apart.

DESIGN

One-year prospective cohort study examining the effect of antibiotic therapy on recurrence and density of VRE stool colonization in patients who have cleared colonization. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was performed to determine whether recurrent VRE strains were the same clone as the previous colonizing strain.

SETTING

A Department of Veterans Affairs medical center including an acute care hospital and nursing home.

PATIENTS

All patients with at least one stool culture positive for VRE who subsequently had three consecutive negative stool cultures obtained at least 1 week apart.

RESULTS

Of the 16 patients who cleared VRE colonization, 13 received antibiotic therapy during the study period. Eight (62%) of the 13 patients who received antibiotics developed recurrent high-density VRE stool colonization (range, 4.9 to 9.1 log10 colony-forming units per gram) during a course of therapy. Five patients had VRE strains available for PFGE analysis; recurrent strains were unrelated to the prior strain in 3 patients, closely related in 1 patient, and indistinguishable in 1 patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic therapy may be associated with recurrent high-density VRE stool colonization in many patients who have previously had three consecutive negative stool cultures. These patients should be screened for recurrent stool colonization when antibiotic therapy is administered.

Effect of antibiotic therapy on the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in the stool of colonized patients

BACKGROUND

Colonization and infection with vancomycin-resistant enterococci have been associated with exposure to antibiotics that are active against anaerobes. In mice that have intestinal colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci, these agents promote high-density colonization, whereas antibiotics with minimal antianaerobic activity do not.

METHODS

We conducted a seven-month prospective study of 51 patients who were colonized with vancomycin-resistant enterococci, as evidenced by the presence of the bacteria in stool. We examined the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in stool during and after therapy with antibiotic regimens and compared the effect on this density of antianaerobic agents and agents with minimal antianaerobic activity. In a subgroup of 10 patients, cultures of environmental specimens (e.g., from bedding and clothing) were obtained.

RESULTS

During treatment with 40 of 42 antianaerobic-antibiotic regimens (95 percent), high-density colonization with vancomycin-resistant enterococci was maintained (mean [+/-SD] number of organisms, 7.8+/-1.5 log per gram of stool). The density of colonization decreased after these regimens were discontinued. Among patients who had not received antianaerobic antibiotics for at least one week, 10 of 13 patients who began such regimens had an increase in the number of organisms of more than 1.0 log per gram (mean increase, 2.2 log per gram), whereas among 10 patients who began regimens of antibiotics with minimal antianaerobic activity, there was a mean decrease in the number of enterococci of 0.6 log per gram (P=0.006 for the difference between groups). When the density of vancomycin-resistant enterococci in stool was at least 4 log per gram, 10 of 12 sets of cultures of environmental specimens had at least one positive sample, as compared with 1 of 9 sets from patients with a mean number of organisms in stool of less than 4 log per gram (P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with vancomycin-resistant enterococci in stool, treatment with antianaerobic antibiotics promotes high-density colonization. Limiting the use of such agents in these patients may help decrease the spread of vancomycin-resistant enterococci.

The treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections: the role of piperacillin/tazobactam

Intra-abdominal infections require treatment effective against both aerobic and anaerobic bacteria. Piperacillin/tazobactam, a beta-lactam/beta-lactamase-inhibitor combination, has a spectrum that includes Gram-positive and Gram-negative aerobic and anaerobic organisms. In one comparative study of piperacillin/tazobactam and gentamicin/clindamycin, 88% of patients treated with piperacillin/tazobactam had a favorable clinical outcome at endpoint compared to 74% of patients treated with gentamicin plus clindamycin. Bacteriological response at endpoint was 87% in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 74% in the gentamicin plus clindamycin group. In a comparative trial of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin, the clinical cure rate was 91% in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 69% in the imipenem/cilastatin group (p = 0.005). Among microbiologically evaluable patients, the infecting organism was eradicated in 93% of piperacillin/tazobactam-treated patients compared to 76% eradication among imipenem/cilastatin-treated patients (p = 0.029). Results of these clinical trials and others have shown that piperacillin/tazobactam is a safe and effective alternative to either combination or monotherapy for intra-abdominal infections.

Piperacillin/tazobactam. A review of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetic properties and therapeutic potential

Combining tazobactam, a beta-lactamase inhibitor, with the ureidopenicillin, piperacillin, successfully restores the activity of piperacillin against beta-lactamase-producing bacteria. Tazobactam has inhibitory activity, and therefore protects piperacillin against Richmond and Sykes types II, III, IV and V beta-lactamases, staphylococcal penicillinase and extended-spectrum beta-lactamases. However, tazobactam has only species-specific activity against class I chromosomally-mediated enzymes. Resistant organisms include some Citrobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Serratia spp., Xanthomonas maltophilia and Enterococcus faecium. Consistent with its in vitro activity, preliminary clinical data indicate that the fixed combination of piperacillin/tazobactam (dose ratio 8:1) is effective in the treatment of moderate to severe polymicrobial infections, including intra-abdominal, skin and soft-tissue and lower respiratory tract infections. In limited comparative trials, piperacillin/tazobactam demonstrated equivalent or better efficacy than standard comparator regimens in these infections. Piperacillin/tazobactam in combination with an aminoglycoside was effective in the empirical treatment of fever in patients with neutropenia and compared favourably with ceftazidime in combination with an aminoglycoside, although second-line therapy with a glycopeptide antibiotic may be indicated in unresponsive episodes. Data from phase III trials indicate that piperacillin/tazobactam has a tolerability profile typical of a penicillin agent. Piperacillin/tazobactam provides a broad spectrum of antibacterial activity in a convenient single formulation suitable for use in the treatment of polymicrobial infections. Possible limitations concern its restricted activity against class I beta-lactamases, enzymes that are becoming increasingly important in the nosocomial environment. Combined therapy with an aminoglycoside may be necessary in more serious infections.