Pharmacokinetics of liquiritigenin and its two glucuronides, M1 and M2, in rats with acute hepatitis induced byd-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide or CCl4

Pharmacological Activities and Phytochemical Constituents

Glycyrrhiza glabra is one of the most popular medicinal plants and it has been used in traditional herbal remedy since ancient times (Blumenthal et al. in Herbal medicine: expanded commission E monographs. Integrative Medicine Communications, Newton, 2000; Parvaiz et al. in Global J Pharmocol 8(1):8–13, 2014; Altay et al. in J Plant Res 129(6):1021–1032, 2016). Many experimental, pharmacological and clinical studies show that liquorice has antimicrobial, antibacterial, antiviral, antifungal, antihepatotoxic, antioxidant, antiulcer, anti-hemorrhoid antihyperglycemic, antidiuretic, antinephritic, anticarcinogenic, antimutagenic, anticytotoxic, anti-inflammatory, and blood stopper activity.

Bioactivity and potential health benefits of licorice

Licorice is an herbal plant named for its unique sweet flavor. It is widely used in the food and tobacco industries as a sweetener. Licorice is also used in traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and complementary medicine. Because the use of licorice has long been a part of TCM, the details of its therapeutic applications have been thoroughly established. In modern science, licorice is of interest because of its broad range of applications. Extracts of and compounds isolated from licorice have been well studied and biologically characterized. In this review, we discuss the nutraceutical and functional activities of licorice as well as those of the extracts of and the isolated compounds from licorice, including agents with anti-inflammatory activity, cell-protective abilities, and chemopreventive effects. The side effects of licorice are also enumerated. A comparison of the activities of licorice described by modern science and TCM is also presented, revealing the correspondence of certain characteristics.

Chiral analytical method development of liquiritigenin with application to a pharmacokinetic study

Pharmacometric characterization studies of liquiritigenin have historically overlooked its chiral nature. To achieve complete characterization, an analytical method enabling the detection and quantification of the individual enantiomers of racemic (±) liquiritigenin is necessary. Resolution of the enantiomers of liquiritigenin was achieved using a simple high-performance liquid chromatographic method. A Chiralpak® ADRH column was employed to perform baseline separation with UV detection at 210 nm.The standard curves were linear ranging from 0.5 to 100 µg/mL for each enantiomer. Limit of quantification was 0.5 µg/mL. The assay was applied successfully to stereoselective serum disposition of liquiritigenin enantiomers in rats. Liquiritigenin enantiomers were detected in serum as both aglycones and glucuronidated conjugates. Both unconjugated enantiomers had a serum half-life of ~15 min in rats. The volume of distribution (V(d) ) for S- and R-liquiritigenin was 1.49 and 2.21 L/kg, respectively. Total clearance (Cl(total) ) was 5.12 L/h/kg for S-liquiritigenin and 4.79 L/h/kg for R-liquiritigenin, and area under the curve (AUC(0-inf) ) was 3.95 µg h/mL for S-liquiritigenin and 4.23 µg h/mL for R-liquiritigenin. The large volume of distribution coupled with the short serum half-life suggests extensive distribution of liquiritigenin into tissues.

Effects of acute renal failure induced by uranyl nitrate on the pharmacokinetics of liquiritigenin and its two glucuronides, M1 and M2, in rats

OBJECTIVES

Liver disease and acute renal failure (ARF) are closely associated. The pharmacokinetics of liquiritigenin (LQ), a candidate therapy for inflammatory liver disease, and its metabolites M1 and M2 were evaluated in rats with ARF induced by uranyl nitrate (U-ARF rats).

METHODS

LQ was administered intravenously (20 mg/kg) or orally (50 mg/kg) in U-ARF and control rats, and uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT) activity and uridine 5'-diphosphoglucuronic acid (UDPGA) concentrations were determined in the liver and intestine.

KEY FINDINGS

After intravenous LQ administration, U-ARF rats displayed significantly slower LQ renal clearance but no significant changes in the LQ area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with controls. This was because of similar hepatic UGT activity and UDPGA levels between two groups, which resulted in comparable non-renal clearance, as well as the limited contribution of LQ renal clearance to total LQ clearance. However, the AUC and AUC(M) /AUC(LQ) ratios of M1 and M2 were significantly increased in U-ARF rats because of decreased urinary excretion of M1 and M2. Similar results were observed following oral administration because of the comparable LQ intestinal metabolism in both groups and decreased urinary excretion of M1 and M2 in U-ARF rats.

CONCLUSIONS

U-ARF rats displayed decreased urinary excretion of LQ glucuronides, resulting in significantly greater AUC and metabolite ratios of M1 and M2 following LQ administration.