Contingency management works, clients like it, and it is cost-effective

Should contingency management protocols and dissemination practices be modified to accommodate rising stimulant use and harm reduction frameworks?

BACKGROUND

Stimulant-related overdoses have increased dramatically, with almost 50% of overdoses in the United States now involving stimulants. Additionally, harm-reduction approaches are increasingly seen as key to reducing the negative impact of substance use. Contingency management (CM), the provision of financial incentives for abstinence, is the most effective treatment for stimulant use disorder, but historically has not been widely implemented. Many recent, large-scale implementation efforts have relied upon foundational CM protocols that may not sufficiently account for recent increases in the prevalence and lethality of stimulant use nor the growing preference for harm reduction versus abstinence-only frameworks.

ARGUMENT

We argue the need to (1) consider whether and how CM protocols might be modified to address rising stimulant use and harm reduction frameworks and (2) make CM widely accessible so that it can reduce population-level stimulant use while ensuring that it is delivered with fidelity to its basic principles. Proposed changes include changing CM reinforcement schedules to emphasize treatment engagement and reductions in use in addition to abstinence, changing guidelines on the duration of and re-engagement in CM, investing in research on virtual CM, incentivizing providers and health systems to deliver CM, making it easier to purchase and use point-of-care drug screens, using direct-to-consumer marketing to increase demand for CM and adapting CM to the community in which it is being implemented.

CONCLUSIONS

Our proposed modifications to contingency management (CM) protocols and accessibility may more effectively address rising stimulant use and align CM more closely with harm-reduction frameworks. Given the urgent need to reduce overdose deaths, developing and testing modified CM protocols may need to rely upon methods other than randomized controlled trials. Efforts to disseminate CM widely to reduce population-level stimulant use must be balanced with the need to maintain fidelity to CM's basic principles.

Prescription digital therapeutics: A new frontier for pharmacists and the future of treatment

Within digital health, digital therapeutics (DTx) are increasingly used to provide clinical treatment. DTx are evidence-based, U.S. Food and Drug Administration-authorized software to treat or manage medical conditions and are available either via prescription or as nonprescription products. DTx that require clinician initiation and oversight are called prescription DTx (PDTs). DTx and PDTs have unique mechanisms of action and are expanding treatment options beyond traditional pharmacotherapy. They may be implemented on their own or used in combination with a drug and in some cases may be the only treatment option for a particular disease state. This article explains how DTx and PDTs function and how these technologies can be incorporated by pharmacists as they attend to their patients' care.

Expanding access to treatment for stimulant use disorder in a frontier state: A qualitative study of contingency management and TRUST program implementation in Montana

BACKGROUND

The client population eligible for treatment services supported by State Opioid Response (SOR) grant funding, administered by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), was expanded to include individuals with a stimulant use disorder (stimUD) in 2020. Due to a significant need to improve services for individuals with stimUD in Montana, the Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities Division (BHDD) of the Montana Department of Public Health and Human Services used the grant opportunity to work with experts in the field of stimUD to pilot contingency management (CM) and the Treatment for Individuals who Use Stimulants (TRUST) treatment model. The CM protocol included twice weekly visits for twelve weeks, using an escalating schedule of gift card incentives contingent upon stimulant-negative urine samples. TRUST is a multi-component treatment program, incorporating exercise, group therapy, and individual therapy with content guided by cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) and clinical research associate (CRA) materials. In addition to SOR dollars, BHDD used additional funding for CM reinforcers provided by state tax dollars to meet research-supported target incentive totals.

METHODS

In this pilot project, TRUST/CM was implemented by four state-approved treatment providers and three Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), all of which had little prior experience with CM as a component of their treatment programs for stimUD. This article examines the processes of training staff, the experiences among staff with initial implementation of the treatment model, and the client characteristics of initial pilot treatment cohorts. Data for this study include primary qualitative data collected from providers, as well as client characteristics collected on the SAMHSA Government Performance and Results Act (GPRA) data collection form.

RESULTS

Seven sites were trained in TRUST/CM, and these sites enrolled a total of 70 patients in the program. Qualitative data collected through interviews with site staff revealed the following themes: the value of intensive technical assistance being integrated in the program, concerns about staff retention and loss of expertise, adjustments of target client populations, and the importance of creative strategies for the provision of evidence-informed incentive totals.

CONCLUSIONS

TRUST/CM was implemented throughout Montana, including rural and urban communities. Qualitative and quantitative data support that providers viewed the CM component as beneficial for treatment retention and improved outcomes for people with stimUD. These implementation study results provide insight into challenges and solutions for providers who are considering the implementation of CM within either a state-approved substance use treatment clinic or FQHC.

A Mixed-methods Evaluation of an Addiction/Cardiology Pilot Clinic With Contingency Management for Patients With Stimulant-associated Cardiomyopathy

OBJECTIVES

Contingency management (CM) is one of the most effective treatments for stimulant use disorder but has not been leveraged for people with stimulant-associated cardiomyopathy (SA-CMP), a chronic health condition with significant morbidity and mortality. We aimed to determine the feasibility and acceptability of a multidisciplinary addiction/cardiology clinic with CM for patients with SA-CMP and to explore barriers and facilitators to engagement and recovery.

METHODS

We recruited patients with a hospitalization in the past 6 months, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (<40%) and stimulant use disorder to participate in Heart Plus, a 12-week addiction/cardiology clinic with CM in an urban, safety-net, hospital-based cardiology clinic, which took place March 2021 through June 2021. Contingency management entailed gift card rewards for attendance and negative point-of-care urine drug screens. Our mixed-methods study used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. We obtained data from the medical record, staff surveys, and qualitative interviews with participants.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were referred, 17 scheduled an appointment, and 12 attended the intake appointment and enrolled in the study. Mean treatment duration was 8 of 12 weeks. Of the 9 participants who attended more than one visit, the median attendance was 82% of available visits for in-person visits and 83% for telephone visits, and all patients reported decreased stimulant use.

CONCLUSIONS

Delivering CM through a multidisciplinary addiction/cardiology clinic for patients with SA-CMP was feasible and engaged patients in care. Further research is needed to assess whether this program is associated with improved heart failure outcomes.

One-Year Efficacy and Incremental Cost-effectiveness of Contingency Management for Cigarette Smokers With Depression

INTRODUCTION

Contingency management (CM) is efficacious for smoking cessation. To date, the number of cost-effectiveness evaluations of behavioral and pharmacological smoking cessation treatments far outnumbers the ones on CM. This study estimated 1-year efficacy and incremental cost-effectiveness of adding CM in relation to abstinence outcomes for a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT)+behavioral activation (BA) treatment.

METHODS

The study sample comprised 120 smokers with depression (% females: 70.8%; mean age: 51.67 [SD = 9.59]) enrolled in an 8-week randomized controlled clinical trial. Clinical effectiveness variables were point-prevalence abstinence, continuous abstinence, longest duration of abstinence (LDA), and Beck-Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) scores at 1-year follow-up. Cost-effectiveness analyses were based on resource utilization, unit costs per patient, and incremental cost per additional LDA week at 1 year.

RESULTS

There was a significant effect of time by treatment group interaction, which indicated superior effects of CBT+BA+CM across time. Point-prevalence abstinence (53.3% [32/60]) was superior in participants receiving CBT+BA+CM compared with those in CBT+BA (23.3% [14/60]), but both groups were equally likely to present sustained reductions in depression. The average cost per patient was €208.85 (US$236.57) for CBT+BA and €410.64 (US$465.14) for CBT+BA+CM, p < .001. The incremental cost of using CM to enhance 1-year abstinence by one extra LDA week was €18 (US$20.39) (95% confidence interval: 17.75-18.25).

CONCLUSIONS

Behavioral treatments addressing both smoking and depression are efficacious for sustaining high quit rates at 1 year. Adding CM to CBT+BA for smoking cessation is highly cost-effective, with an estimated net benefit of €4704 (US$5344.80).

IMPLICATIONS

Informing on the cost-effectiveness of CM might expedite the translation of research findings into clinical practice. Findings suggested that CM is feasible and highly cost-effective, confirming that its implementation is worthwhile. At a CM cost per patient of €410.64 (US$465.14), the net benefit equals €4704 (US$5344.80), although even starting from a minimum investment of €20 (US$22.72) was cost-effective.

CLINICALTRIALS-GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT03163056.

Acceptability and willingness to pay for contingency management interventions among parents of young adults with problematic opioid use

BACKGROUND

There is a need for new research addressing the cost prohibitive nature of maintaining contingency management (CM) in community settings. While researchers propose managed care as an option to support costs, there is no research on self-pay models. To inform such research, it is important first to understand client willingness to pay for CM services. We examine acceptability and willingness to pay for CM services among parents with and without young adult children with problematic opioid use.

METHODS

A web-based survey was administered to a sample of parents of adult children ages 18-35 with (target sample) and without (comparison sample) a history of problematic opiate use.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty parents participated (n_target = 30; n_comparison = 100) and were predominately white, college educated, and of higher income. Findings showed a high proportion of participants had positive opinions of using incentives for substance use treatment and would consider incentive-based treatments for their child. Most participants reported they would be willing to pay for CM at levels consistent with amounts used in efficacious programs but expressed worry that incentives would be used to buy drugs. Most participants reported this worry would be eased if incentives were delivered via reloadable gift cards and if incentives were only delivered during periods of abstinence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to examine parent perceptions of incentives and acceptability and willingness to pay for CM services. Results suggest self-pay models for disseminating CM to young adults with problematic opioid use may be an option.

Translating transdermal alcohol monitoring procedures for contingency management among adults recently arrested for DWI

Recent developments in alcohol monitoring devices have made it more feasible to use contingency management (CM) procedures to reduce alcohol use. A growing body of literature is demonstrating the effectiveness of CM to reduce alcohol use among community recruited adults wearing transdermal alcohol concentration (TAC) monitoring devices. This article describes the quality improvement process aimed at adapting TAC-informed CM aimed at minimizing alcohol use and maximizing treatment completion. This extends literature to a high-risk population; adults arrested and awaiting trial (pretrial) for criminal charge of driving while intoxicated (DWI). Participants were enrolled during their orientation to pretrial supervision conditions of DWI bond release. At enrollment, participants completed a screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment; those with high risk alcohol histories were enrolled in an 8-week CM procedure to avoid TAC readings. Four Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) quality improvement cycles were conducted where the TAC cutoff for determining alcohol use, the quantity of reinforcer, and handling of tampers on the transdermal alcohol monitor were manipulated. Across four PDSA cycles, the retention for the full 8-weeks of treatment was increased. The proportion of weeks with alcohol use was not decreased across cycles, the peak TAC values observed during drinking weeks were significantly lower in Cycles 1 and 4 than 3. CM may be developed as a tool for pretrial supervision to be used to increase bond compliance of those arrested for DWI and for others as a method to identify the need for additional judicial services.