Simultaneous recording of auditory evoked potentials. Relationships among the fast, middle and long latency components

Electrophysiological Examination of Ambient Speech Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants

PURPOSE

This research examined the expression of cortical auditory evoked potentials in a cohort of children who received cochlear implants (CIs) for treatment of congenital deafness (n = 28) and typically hearing controls (n = 28).

METHOD

We make use of a novel electroencephalography paradigm that permits the assessment of auditory responses to ambiently presented speech and evaluates the contributions of concurrent visual stimulation on this activity.

RESULTS

Our findings show group differences in the expression of auditory sensory and perceptual event-related potential components occurring in 80- to 200-ms and 200- to 300-ms time windows, with reductions in amplitude and a greater latency difference for CI-using children. Relative to typically hearing children, current source density analysis showed muted responses to concurrent visual stimulation in CI-using children, suggesting less cortical specialization and/or reduced responsiveness to auditory information that limits the detection of the interaction between sensory systems.

CONCLUSION

These findings indicate that even in the face of early interventions, CI-using children may exhibit disruptions in the development of auditory and multisensory processing.

A novel EEG paradigm to simultaneously and rapidly assess the functioning of auditory and visual pathways

Objective assessment of the sensory pathways is crucial for understanding their development across the life span and how they may be affected by neurodevelopmental disorders (e.g., autism spectrum) and neurological pathologies (e.g., stroke, multiple sclerosis, etc.). Quick and passive measurements, for example, using electroencephalography (EEG), are especially important when working with infants and young children and with patient populations having communication deficits (e.g., aphasia). However, many EEG paradigms are limited to measuring activity from one sensory domain at a time, may be time consuming, and target only a subset of possible responses from that particular sensory domain (e.g., only auditory brainstem responses or only auditory P1-N1-P2 evoked potentials). Thus we developed a new multisensory paradigm that enables simultaneous, robust, and rapid (6-12 min) measurements of both auditory and visual EEG activity, including auditory brainstem responses, auditory and visual evoked potentials, as well as auditory and visual steady-state responses. This novel method allows us to examine neural activity at various stations along the auditory and visual hierarchies with an ecologically valid continuous speech stimulus, while an unrelated video is playing. Both the speech stimulus and the video can be customized for any population of interest. Furthermore, by using two simultaneous visual steady-state stimulation rates, we demonstrate the ability of this paradigm to track both parafoveal and peripheral visual processing concurrently. We report results from 25 healthy young adults, which validate this new paradigm.NEW & NOTEWORTHY A novel electroencephalography paradigm enables the rapid, reliable, and noninvasive assessment of neural activity along both auditory and visual pathways concurrently. The paradigm uses an ecologically valid continuous speech stimulus for auditory evaluation and can simultaneously track visual activity to both parafoveal and peripheral visual space. This new methodology may be particularly appealing to researchers and clinicians working with infants and young children and with patient populations with limited communication abilities.

Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. V. Amplitude-variability comparisons in early, middle, and late responses

Each of two groups of adult subjects was tested under a repeated-measures design (Lauter & Loomis, 1986, 1988; Lauter & Karzon, 1990a, b) for ABRs and one other set of responses: middle-latency responses (MLRs: 10 to 50 ms post-stimulus) from Group II (four females and four males), and late responses (50 to 300 ms post-stimulus) from Group I (four females and three males). A companion paper (Lauter & Karzon, 1990b) presents data comparing and contrasting the patterns of relative variability of waveform-peak latency observed in middle-latency, late responses, and the ABR data previously reported. This paper presents amplitude results for the same data sets. Our findings indicate that, as we have reported previously, with regard to between-subject vs. within-subject variability of peak parameters of auditory EP waveforms, normal adult subjects are more consistent when compared with themselves than when compared with each other. This is true at all auditory EP levels tested, from brainstem to cortex, and is observed in both amplitude and latency data, in spite of the fact that the actual values of amplitude-stability measures are an order of magnitude smaller than for latency stability.

Individual differences in auditory electric responses: comparisons of between-subject and within-subject variability. IV. Latency-variability comparisons in early, middle, and late responses

In this series of reports to date (Lauter & Loomis, 1986, 1988; Lauter & Karzon, 1990 a & b) we have described patterns of relative variability observed in latency and amplitude of auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) collected in a repeated-measures within-subjects design testing two groups of neurologically normal adults. Each of the two groups of subjects was additionally tested for one other type of auditory evoked potential, according to the same schedule of eight weekly sessions: middle-latency responses (MLRs: 10 to 50 ms post-stimulus) were collected from Group II (four females and four males), and late responses (50 to 300 ms post-stimulus) from Group I (four females and three males). This paper presents data comparing and contrasting the patterns of relative variability of waveform-peak latency observed in middle-latency, late responses, and the ABR data previously reported. Results document a trimodal distribution of response latency variability, with ABR peak V in one category, characterized by high within-subject stability and low between-subject stability, ABR peaks II, III, and IV, together with MLR peak No in a second category, of intermediate within-subject stability, and a third category consisting of ABR peak I together with all auditory-evoked-potential (AEP) peaks subsequent to MLR peak No, in which consistency of peak latency calculated within subjects approaches the low level of consistency calculated across subjects.

Hearing assessment in developmentally impaired infants: classical conditioning as a supplement to brainstem-evoked response audiometry (BERA)

The brainstem-evoked response audiometry (BERA) is probably the most common approach to hearing assessment in high-risk and developmentally handicapped infants. It is usually suggested, however, that BERA should not be the sole assessment method. In an attempt to determine an effective supplement to BERA, the present study evaluated a classical conditioning procedure with developmentally impaired babies. Within this procedure, different tones served as conditioned stimuli while an air-puff was used as the unconditioned stimulus. Results indicate that this procedure could be successfully applied with almost all of the babies.