1
|
Bennett JH, Beeley JA, Anderson P, Belfield L, Brand HS, Didilescu AC, Dymock D, Guven Y, Hector MP, Holbrook P, Jayasinghe JAP, O'Sullivan J, Riggio M, Roger-Leroi V, Scheven B, Sloan AJ, Vandamme K, Manzanares MC. A core curriculum in the biological and biomedical sciences for dentistry. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF DENTAL EDUCATION : OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION FOR DENTAL EDUCATION IN EUROPE 2020; 24:433-441. [PMID: 32078216 DOI: 10.1111/eje.12518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2019] [Revised: 01/24/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2020] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The biomedical sciences (BMS) are a central part of the dental curriculum that underpins teaching and clinical practice in all areas of dentistry. Although some specialist groups have proposed curricula in their particular topic areas, there is currently no overarching view of what should be included in a BMS curriculum for undergraduate dental programmes. To address this, the Association for Dental Education in Europe (ADEE) convened a Special Interest Group (SIG) with representatives from across Europe to develop a consensus BMS curriculum for dental programmes. CURRICULUM This paper summarises the outcome of the deliberations of this SIG and details a consensus view from the SIG of what a BMS curriculum should include. CONCLUSIONS Given the broad nature of BMS applied to dentistry, this curriculum framework is advisory and seeks to provide programme planners with an indicative list of topics which can be mapped to specific learning objectives within their own curricula. As dentistry becomes increasingly specialised, these will change, or some elements of the undergraduate curriculum may move to the post-graduate setting. So, this document should be seen as a beginning and it will need regular review as BMS curricula in dentistry evolve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jon H Bennett
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | | | - Paul Anderson
- Queen Mary and Westfield University of London (QMUL), London, UK
| | - Louise Belfield
- Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth University, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schofield KA. Anatomy education in occupational therapy curricula: Perspectives of practitioners in the United States. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION 2018; 11:243-253. [PMID: 28857454 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2016] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 08/05/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
The study of human anatomy is an integral component in the education of future occupational therapists, yet there is a paucity of research that explores the anatomy needs of students and new practitioners. As a follow up from a pilot study that surveyed a small cohort of practicing therapists, this article aimed to determine occupational therapy (OT) practitioners' views on anatomy course structure and content deemed important to include in OT curricula, entry level practitioners' anatomy knowledge, and application of anatomy in current practice. A Likert scale and free text questionnaire was distributed to practicing occupational therapists across the United States. Fifty-four percent of the participants in this cohort favored a standalone course, as compared to 94% in the pilot study group. Anatomy course content areas were comparable across groups. Systems identified as essential to cover in an OT anatomy course included skeletal, muscular, and nervous. Regions included the upper limb, thorax/trunk, head and neck, and lower limb. Seventy percent of participants in both groups felt that entry-level practitioners had adequate anatomy knowledge; 30% did not. Practice areas requiring anatomy knowledge included assessment of joint movement, muscle strength, pain, and functional mobility. Qualitative analysis of free text response data revealed the importance of anatomy knowledge in OT assessment and intervention strategies, determining the impact of injury or disease on occupational performance, client safety, and communication with other health care professionals and families. Anat Sci Educ 11: 243-253. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Schofield
- Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Health Sciences, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bleakley A. Seven Types of Ambiguity in Evaluating the Impact of Humanities Provision in Undergraduate Medicine Curricula. THE JOURNAL OF MEDICAL HUMANITIES 2015; 36:337-357. [PMID: 25843724 DOI: 10.1007/s10912-015-9337-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
Inclusion of the humanities in undergraduate medicine curricula remains controversial. Skeptics have placed the burden of proof of effectiveness upon the shoulders of advocates, but this may lead to pursuing measurement of the immeasurable, deflecting attention away from the more pressing task of defining what we mean by the humanities in medicine. While humanities input can offer a fundamental critical counterweight to a potentially reductive biomedical science education, a new wave of thinking suggests that the kinds of arts and humanities currently used in medical education are neither radical nor critical enough to have a deep effect on students' learning and may need to be reformulated. The humanities can certainly educate for tolerance of ambiguity as a basis to learning democratic habits for contemporary team-based clinical work. William Empson's 'seven types of ambiguity' model for analyzing poetry is transposed to medical education to: (a) formulate seven values proffered by the humanities for improving medical education; (b) offer seven ways of measuring impact of medical humanities provision, thereby reducing ambiguity; and
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alan Bleakley
- Graduate School, Academy for Innovation and Research (AIR), Falmouth University, Penryn Campus, Treliever Road, Penryn, Cornwall, TR10 9FE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Orsbon CP, Kaiser RS, Ross CF. Physician opinions about an anatomy core curriculum: a case for medical imaging and vertical integration. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION 2014; 7:251-61. [PMID: 24022941 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2013] [Revised: 08/03/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2013] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Pre-clinical anatomy curricula must provide medical students with the knowledge needed in a variety of medical and surgical specialties. But do physicians within specialties agree about what anatomical knowledge is most important in their practices? And, what is the common core of anatomical knowledge deemed essential by physicians in different specialties? Answers to these questions would be useful in designing pre-clinical anatomy courses. The primary aim of this study was to assess the importance of a human gross anatomy course by soliciting the opinions of physicians from a range of specialties. We surveyed 93 physicians to determine the importance of specific anatomical topics in their own practices. Their responses were analyzed to assess variation in intra- and inter-departmental attitudes toward the importance of anatomy. Nearly all of the topics taught in the course were deemed important by the clinicians as a group, but respondents showed little agreement on the rank order of importance of anatomical topics. Overall, only medical imaging received high importance by nearly all respondents, and lower importance was attached to embryology and lymphatic anatomy. Our survey data, however, also suggested distinct hierarchies in the importance assigned to anatomical topics within specialties. Given that physicians view the importance of anatomy differently, we suggest that students revisit anatomy through a vertically integrated curriculum tailored to provide specialty-specific anatomical training to advanced students based on their areas of clinical interest. Integration of medical imaging into pre-clinical anatomy courses, already underway in many medical schools, is of high clinical relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Courtney P Orsbon
- The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Division of Biological Sciences, Chicago, llinois; Department of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lisk K, Flannery JF, Loh EY, Richardson D, Agur AMR, Woods NN. Determination of clinically relevant content for a musculoskeletal anatomy curriculum for physical medicine and rehabilitation residents. ANATOMICAL SCIENCES EDUCATION 2014; 7:135-43. [PMID: 23922307 DOI: 10.1002/ase.1393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2013] [Revised: 06/07/2013] [Accepted: 06/30/2013] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
To address the need for more clinical anatomy training in residency education, many postgraduate programs have implemented structured anatomy courses into their curriculum. Consensus often does not exist on specific content and level of detail of the content that should be included in such curricula. This article describes the use of the Delphi method to identify clinically relevant content to incorporate in a musculoskeletal anatomy curriculum for Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (PM&R) residents. A two round modified Delphi involving PM&R experts was used to establish the curricular content. The anatomical structures and clinical conditions presented to the expert group were compiled using multiple sources: clinical musculoskeletal anatomy cases from the PM&R residency program at the University of Toronto; consultation with PM&R experts; and textbooks. In each round, experts rated the importance of each curricular item to PM&R residency education using a five-point Likert scale. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was used to determine consensus at the end of each round and agreement scores were used as an outcome measure to determine the content to include in the curriculum. The overall internal consistency in both rounds was 0.99. A total of 37 physiatrists from across Canada participated and the overall response rate over two rounds was 97%. The initial curricular list consisted of 361 items. After the second iteration, the list was reduced by 44%. By using a national consensus method we were able to objectively determine the relevant anatomical structures and clinical musculoskeletal conditions important in daily PM&R practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Lisk
- Graduate Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cohen R, Eva KW. How might mathematics education be used to improve diagnostic reasoning? Diagnosis (Berl) 2014. [DOI: 10.1515/dx-2013-0022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
7
|
Lloyd H, Hinton T, Bullock S, Babey AM, Davis E, Fernandes L, Hart J, Musgrave I, Ziogas J. An evaluation of pharmacology curricula in Australian science and health-related degree programs. BMC MEDICAL EDUCATION 2013; 13:153. [PMID: 24252183 PMCID: PMC3842843 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6920-13-153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2013] [Accepted: 11/12/2013] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacology is a biomedical discipline taught in basic science and professional degree programs. In order to provide information that would facilitate pharmacology curricula to be refined and developed, and approaches to teaching to be updated, a national survey was undertaken in Australia that investigated pharmacology course content, teaching and summative assessment methods. METHODS Twenty-two institutions participated in a purpose-built online questionnaire, which enabled an evaluation of 147 courses taught in 10 different degrees. To enable comparison, degrees were grouped into four major degree programs, namely science, pharmacy, medicine and nursing. The pharmacology content was then classified into 16 lecture themes, with 2-21 lecture topics identified per theme. The resultant data were analysed for similarities and differences in pharmacology curricula across the degree programs. RESULTS While all lecture themes were taught across degree programs, curriculum content differed with respect to the breadth and hours of coverage. Overall, lecture themes were taught most broadly in medicine and with greatest coverage in pharmacy. Reflecting a more traditional approach, lectures were a dominant teaching method (at least 90% of courses). Sixty-three percent of science courses provided practical classes but such sessions occurred much less frequently in other degree programs, while tutorials were much more common in pharmacy degree programs (70%). Notably, problem-based learning was common across medical programs. Considerable diversity was found in the types of summative assessment tasks employed. In science courses the most common form of in-semester assessment was practical reports, whereas in other programs pen-and-paper quizzes predominated. End-of-semester assessment contributed 50-80% to overall assessment across degree programs. CONCLUSION The similarity in lecture themes taught across the four different degree programs shows that common knowledge- and competency-based learning outcomes can be defined for pharmacology. The authors contend that it is the differences in breadth and coverage of material for each lecture theme, and the differing teaching modes and assessment that characterise particular degree programs. Adoption of pharmacology knowledge-based learning outcomes that could be tailored to suit individual degree programs would better facilitate the sharing of expertise and teaching practice than the current model where pharmacology curricula are degree-specific.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary Lloyd
- The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Tina Hinton
- School of Medical Sciences (Pharmacology), The University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia
| | - Shane Bullock
- Gippsland Medical School, Monash University, Northways Road, Churchill VIC 3842, Australia
| | - Anna-Marie Babey
- School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale NSW 2351, Australia
| | - Elizabeth Davis
- Department of Pharmacology, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Lynette Fernandes
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, The University of Western Australia, Crawley WA 6009, Australia
| | - Joanne Hart
- School of Medical Sciences, RMIT University, Bundoora VIC 3083, Australia
| | - Ian Musgrave
- Discipline of Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
| | - James Ziogas
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Melbourne, Parkville VIC 3010, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Inuwa IM, Taranikanti V, Al-Rawahy M, Roychoudhry S, Habbal O. "Between a Rock and a Hard Place": The discordant views among medical teachers about anatomy content in the undergraduate medical curriculum. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J 2012; 12:19-24. [PMID: 22375254 DOI: 10.12816/0003083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2011] [Revised: 09/07/2011] [Accepted: 10/30/2011] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The last two decades of medical education have been marked by a persistent push towards curricular reform. Anatomy as a discipline, the unshakable foundation of medical teaching for hundreds of years, has been at the centre of this development. Although it is widely agreed that for doctors to be competent, they need an adequate knowledge of anatomy underpinning medicine, there is much less agreement over the quantity required, and who should decide and define it. Many clinicians feel medical students are being under-trained in this basic medical science before reaching the clinical stages. Professional accreditation boards advocate the reduction of factual information in undergraduate medical courses. Anatomists complain of a progressive erosion of the time allocated to the subject. Caught in the midst of this controversy is the student of anatomy who is left bewildered and confused about what is required from him to become a safe and competent health professional. The way forward might, first, be for medical schools to facilitate discussions between students, anatomy professors, and clinicians to bring these divergent perspectives into alignment. Second, the anatomists need to re-invent themselves in two principal frameworks: first, to present the subject in the context within which it will be utilised by the student, and second to employ the overwhelming learning tool of today, i.e. technology, in their teaching and assessment of the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ibrahim M Inuwa
- Department of Human & Clinical Anatomy, College of Medicine & Health Sciences, Sultan Qaboos University, Muscat, Oman
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Determining the content of an educational ENT website using the Delphi technique. The Journal of Laryngology & Otology 2012; 126:402-6. [PMID: 22289190 DOI: 10.1017/s0022215111003422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to develop an educational website (www.enttheatre.com) that showed common ENT operations and emergencies, in order to help improve the basic surgical ENT knowledge of medical students and junior doctors. A two-round Delphi survey was conducted to establish the contents of the website. 'Experts' who participated in the Delphi process included otolaryngology consultants and trainees, junior doctors, general practitioners, and medical students. First- and second-round Delphi response rates were 49 per cent (61/125) and 92 per cent (56/61), respectively. Our paper presents a consensus opinion on what basic surgical knowledge a medical student or junior doctor should be familiar with in otolaryngology.
Collapse
|