Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region: Ultrastructural Study of a Case

Papillary Tumor of the Pineal Region: Systematic Review and Analysis of Prognostic Factors

BACKGROUND

Clinical outcomes and biological behavior of papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPR) are still under investigation. The best therapeutic strategy has not been defined.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comprehensive patient-level analysis of all PTPR cases and identify their clinical features, treatment options, and prognostic factors.

METHODS

A search of the medical databases for case series and reports on PTPRs from January 2003 to June 2017 was performed. Data addressing PTPR's clinical presentation, imaging, treatment, and histological features were. Variables associated with the primary outcome of 36-mo survival were identified through Cox regression models.

RESULTS

The initial search yielded 1164 studies, of which 71 were included (60 case reports and 11 case series), containing 177 patients (mean age 33.0 ± 15.3 yr and 53.2% male). Intracranial hypertension and hydrocephalus prevailed as the clinical picture. Surgery was performed on 82.0% and gross total resection (GTR) was achieved on 71.4%. A total of 56.8% recurred after a median 29 mo (quartiles 10.5-45.5). The 36-mo survival rate was 83.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.2-89.2%). Good functional outcomes (Glasgow Outcome Scale 4/5) were observed in 60.0%. The variables of interest were inconsistently reported and the multivariable analysis final sample was 133 patients. After adjustment for age, tumor size (each additional centimeter, hazard ratio [HR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.12-3.53, P = .019) and surgical treatment (HR 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.45, P = .001) were associated with 36-mo survival.

CONCLUSION

Tumor size and surgery are associated with improvement in 36-mo survival. We did not observe any significant benefits from GTR or adjuvant treatments.

Recurrent Pineocytomalike Papillary Tumor of The Pineal Region: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPRs) are malignant World Health Organization grade II/III tumors; however, they may perfectly mimic benign tumors (e.g., pineocytomas [World Health Organization grade I]).

CASE DESCRIPTION

We present a case of a 28-year-old man with a 35-mm tumor of the pineal region. Considering the typical radiological and pathologic presentation, the tumor was first diagnosed as pineocytoma. However, despite first total resection, the tumor recurred after 7 years. The recurrent neoplasm was composed mainly of papillary structures with low-grade atypical cells positive for CKAE1/AE3 and CK18. This categorization led to the final diagnosis of PTPR. The patient underwent adjuvant radiotherapy, which vastly improved his neurologic condition and resulted in significant tumor regression.

CONCLUSIONS

This case exemplifies that PTPRs can perfectly mimic pineocytomas and simple staining for cytokeratins may warrant correct diagnosis and better treatment.

The Continuing Value of Ultrastructural Observation in Central Nervous System Neoplasms in Children

Central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms are the second most common childhood malignancy after leukemia and the most common solid organ neoplasm in children. Diagnostic dilemmas with small specimens from CNS neoplasms are often the result of multifactorial etiologies such as frozen or fixation artifact, biopsy size, or lack of knowledge about rare or unfamiliar entities. Since the late 1950s, ultrastructural examination has been used in the diagnosis of CNS neoplasms, though it has largely been replaced by immunohistochemical and molecular cytogenetic studies. Nowadays, pathologic diagnosis of CNS neoplasms is achieved through intraoperative cytology, light microscopy, immunohistochemistry, and molecular cytogenetic results. However, the utility of electron microscopy (EM) in the final diagnosis of CNS neoplasms and investigation of its pathogenetic origin remains critical. Here, we reviewed the distinguishing ultrastructural features of pediatric CNS neoplasms and emphasize the continuing value of EM in the diagnosis of CNS neoplasms.

Papillary tumor of the pineal region: Histopathological characterization and review of the literature

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The papillary tumor of the pineal region (PTPR) was described as a distinct new entity for the first time in 2003 by our team and has been included in the last 2007 WHO classification of tumors of the Central Nervous System. We describe the histopathological characterization of PTPR and present a review of the literature.

METHODS

The description of the histological and immunological features of PTPR is based on the 2007 WHO classification.

RESULTS

PTPR affects both children and adults, and mostly young adults in the third decade. PTPR is a neuroepithelial tumor occurring in the vicinity of the pineal gland, and characterized by its papillary architecture. The papillae are lined by multi-layered cuboidal to columnar epithelioid tumoral cells arranged in perivascular pseudorosettes. Immunohistochemistry shows strong reactivity for cytokeratins, particularly for cytokeratin 18. On electron microscopy, PTPR reveals ultrastructural features indicative of ependymal differentiation, including abundant microvilli at the apical cell pole. The differential diagnosis includes a variety of other papillary tumors, most notably papillary ependymoma, choroid plexus papilloma, papillary meningioma, and metastatic papillary carcinoma in adults. On the basis of ultrastructural and immunohistochemical features, it has been suggested that a PTPR arises from specialized cytokeratin-positive and nestin-positive ependymal cells that are derived from the subcommissural organ. Although the precise histological grading criteria of PTPR remain to be defined, its biological behavior may correspond to WHO grade II or III.

Pediatric papillary tumors of the pineal region: to observe or to treat following gross total resection?

INTRODUCTION

Papillary tumors of the pineal region (PTPR) are rare brain tumors characterized by frequent local recurrences. Standardized treatment strategies are not yet defined.

CASE REPORT

We present the case of a 3-year-old girl diagnosed with PTPR. Due to her young age, adjuvant radiotherapy was omitted after gross total tumor resection. Thirty-six months later, local tumor recurrence occurred. Considering the possible risks of secondary surgery, the recurrent tumor was irradiated with proton radiotherapy. Three months later, the tumor showed near-complete remission.

DISCUSSION

Based on this experience and other pediatric case reports from the literature, local radiotherapy might be suggested also after complete tumor resection.